Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-pwrkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-30T21:25:25.566Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2010

Alan Schwartz
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Chicago
George Bergus
Affiliation:
University of Iowa
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Medical Decision Making
A Physician's Guide
, pp. 191 - 204
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ancker, J. S., Senathirajah, Y., Kukafka, R.et al. (2006). Design features of graphs in health risk communications: A systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 13(6), 608–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Antonopoulos, S. (2002). Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. Circulation, 106, 3143–421.Google Scholar
Arkes, H. R., Christensen, C., Lai, C.et al. (1987). Two methods of reducing overconfidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39(1), 133–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arkes, H. R., Shaffer, V. A., and Medow, M. A. (in press). The influence of a physician's use of a diagnostic decision aid on the malpractice verdicts of mock jurors. Medical Decision Making.Google Scholar
Arkes, H. R., Shaffer, V. A., and Medow, M. A. (2007). Patients derogate physicians who use a computer-assisted diagnostic aid. Medical Decision Making, 27(2), 189–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Armstrong, G. L., Billah, K., Rein, D. B.et al. (2007). The economics of routine childhood hepatitis A immunization in the United States: The impact of herd immunity. Pediatrics, 119(1), e22–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Armstrong, J. S. (2001). Combining forecasts. In Principles of Forecasting: A Handbook for Researchers and Practitioners. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, pp. 417–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, R. M., and Kellum, J. (2003). Moral justifications for surrogate decision making in the intensive care unit: Implications and limitations. Critical Care Medicine, 31(5 Suppl), S347–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Asch, D. A., Baron, J., Hershey, J. C.et al. (1994). Omission bias and pertussis vaccination. Medical Decision Making, 14(2), 118–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baron, J., and Spranca, M. (1997). Protected values. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Basu, A., and Meltzer, D. (2005). Implications of spillover effects within the family for medical cost-effectiveness analysis. Journal of Health Economics, 24(4), 751–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bayoumi, A. M. (2004). The measurement of contingent valuation for health economics. PharmacoEconomics, 22(11), 691–700.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beauchamp, T. L., and Childress, J. F. (1979). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, T. L., and DeGrazia, D. (2004). Principles and principlism. In Handbook of Bioethics: Taking Stock of the Field from a Philosophical Perspective, ed. Khushf, G.. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, pp. 55–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentham, J. (1970). An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (1789): The collected work of Jeremy Bentham. London: Clarendon, p. 283.Google Scholar
Bergus, G. R., Levin, I. P., and Elstein, A. S. (2002). Presenting risks and benefits to patients: The effect of information order on decision making. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 17(8), 612–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernoulli, D. (1954). Exposition of a new theory on the measurement of risk. Econometrica, 22(1), 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bier, V. M., and Connell, B. L. (1994). Ambiguity seeking in multi-attribute decisions: Effects of optimism and message framing. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 7(3), 169–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birnbaum, M. H., Patton, J. N., and Lott, M. K. (1999). Evidence against rank-dependent utility theories: Tests of cumulative independence, interval independence, stochastic dominance, and transitivity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 77(1), 44–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blais, A., and Weber, E. (2006). A domain-specific risk-taking (DOSPERT) scale for adult populations. Judgment and Decision Making, 1(1), 33–47.Google Scholar
Bleichrodt, H., and Pinto, J. L. (2000). A parameter-free elicitation of the probability weighting function in medical decision analysis. Management Science, 46(11), 1485–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boudreaux, D. J. (2006). A free market in body organs. Pittsburgh, PA: Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, May 31, 2006. Retrieved March 3, 2007, from http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/opinion/columnists/boudreaux/s_456004.htmlGoogle Scholar
Boyle, J. (2004). Casuistry. In Handbook of Bioethics: Taking Stock of the Field from a Philosophical Perspective, ed. Khushf, G.. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, pp. 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brainerd, C., and Reyna, V. (1992). Fuzzy-trace theory: Some foundational issues. Learning and Individual Differences, 7(2), 145–62.Google Scholar
Brase, G. L. (2002). Which statistical formats facilitate what decisions? The perception and influence of different statistical information formats. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15(5), 381–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brazier, J., Roberts, J., and Deverill, M. (2002). The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. Journal of Health Economics, 21(2), 271–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brazier, J. E., and Roberts, J. (2004). The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-12. Medical Care, 42(9), 851–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brewer, N. T., and Hallman, W. K. (2006). Subjective and objective risk as predictors of influenza vaccination during the vaccine shortage of 2004–2005. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 43, 1379–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brickman, P., Coates, D., and Janoff-Bulman, R. (1978). Lottery winners and accident victims: Is happiness relative? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(8), 917–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brock, D. (2004). Ethical issues in cost effectiveness analysis. In Handbook of Bioethics: Taking Stock of the Field from a Philosophical Perspective, ed. Khushf, G.. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, pp. 353–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, B. (2004). The ethics of controlled clinical trials. In Handbook of Bioethics: Taking Stock of the Field from a Philosophical Perspective, ed. Khushf, G.. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, pp. 337–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budescu, D., Karelitz, T., and Wallsten, T. (2003). Predicting the directionality of probability words from their membership functions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16(3), 159–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burstein, H. J., Gelber, S., Guadagnoli, E.et al. (1999). Use of alternative medicine by women with early-stage breast cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 340(22), 1733–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bursztajn, H. J., Feinbloom, R. I., Hamm, R. M.et al. (1990). Medical Choices, Medical Chances: How Patients, Families, and Physicians Can Cope with Uncertainty. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butcher, S. H. (1911). Aristotle's Poetics. London: Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar
Camerer, C., and Weber, M. (1992). Recent developments in modeling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguity. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 325–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappelen, A. W., and Norheim, O. F. (2006). Responsibility, fairness and rationing in health care. Health Policy, 76(3), 312–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cardenas, V. M., Mulla, Z. D., Ortiz, M.et al. (2005). Iron deficiency and Helicobacter pylori infection in the United States. American Journal of Epidemiology, 163(2), 127–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cayley, W. (2004). I just want my pills. Wisconsin Medical Journal, 103(2), 11.Google Scholar
Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health. (2007). The Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry. Boston: ICRHPS, Tufts Medical Center. Retrieved March 18, 2008 from www.cearegistry.org.
Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. (2004). EBM calculator. University of Toronto. Retrieved March 18, 2008 from www.cebm.utoronto.ca/palm/ebmcalc/.
Chapman, G. B., Bergus, G. R., and Elstein, A. S. (1996). Order of information affects clinical judgment. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 9(3), 201–11.3.0.CO;2-J>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chou, R., Huffman, L. H., Fu, R.et al. (2005). Screening for HIV: A review of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Annals of Internal Medicine, 143(1), 55–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choudhry, N. K., Anderson, G. M., Laupacis, A.et al. (2006). Impact of adverse events on prescribing warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: Matched pair analysis. BMJ, 332(7534), 141–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christianson, T. J. H., Bryant, S. C., Weymiller, A. J.et al. (2006). A pen-and-paper coronary risk estimator for office use with patients with type 2 diabetes. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 81(5), 632–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Claxton, K., Cohen, J. T., and Neumann, P. J. (2005). When is evidence sufficient? Health Affairs, 24(1), 93–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Claxton, K., Sculpher, M., and Drummond, M. (2002). A rational framework for decision making by the National Institute For Clinical Excellence (NICE). The Lancet, 360(9334), 711–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claxton, K. P., and Sculpher, M. J. (2006). Using value of information analysis to prioritise health research: Some lessons from recent UK experience. PharmacoEconomics, 24(11), 1055–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Constantine, N. A., and Jerman, P. (2007). Acceptance of human papillomavirus vaccination among Californian parents of daughters: A representative statewide analysis. Journal of Adolescent Health, 40(2), 108–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooke, A. D. J., and Mellers, B. A. (1998). Multiattribute judgment: Attribute spacing influences single attributes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(2), 496–504.Google Scholar
Cox, A. C., Fallowfield, L. J., and Jenkins, V. A. (2006). Communication and informed consent in phase 1 trials: A review of the literature. Supportive Care in Cancer, 14(4), 303–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cram, P., Fendrick, A. M.Inadomi, J.et al. (2003). The impact of a celebrity promotional campaign on the use of colon cancer screening: The Katie Couric effect. Archives of Internal Medicine, 163(13), 1601–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Damschroder, L. J., Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., and Ubel, P. A. (2005). The impact of considering adaptation in health state valuation. Social Science & Medicine, 61(2), 267–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graves, S., and Aranda, S. (2005). When a child cannot be cured: Reflections of health professionals. European Journal of Cancer Care, 14(2), 132–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., and Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeKay, M. L., and Asch, D. A. (1998). Is the defensive use of diagnostic tests good for patients, or bad? Medical Decision Making, 18(1), 19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wit, G. A., Busschbach, J. J., and Charro, F. T. (2000). Sensitivity and perspective in the valuation of health status: Whose values count? Health Economics, 9(2), 109–26.3.0.CO;2-L>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Djulbegovic, B., Hozo, I., and Lyman, G. H. (2000). Linking evidence-based medicine therapeutic summary measures to clinical decision analysis. Medscape General Medicine, 13, E6.Google ScholarPubMed
Dolan, J. G., Isselhardt, B. J. Jr., and Cappuccio, J. D. (1989). The analytic hierarchy process in medical decision making: A tutorial. Medical Decision Making, 9(1), 40–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dolan, P. (1996). Modelling valuations for health states: The effect of duration. Health Policy, 38(3), 189–203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dolan, P. (2000). The measurement of health-related quality of life for use in resource allocation decisions in health care. Handbook of Health Economics, 1, 1723–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, P., and Stalmeier, P. (2003). The validity of time trade-off values in calculating QALYs: Constant proportional time trade-off versus the proportional heuristic. Journal of Health Economics, 3, 445–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebell, M. H., Bergus, G. R., Warbasse, L.et al. (1996). The inability of physicians to predict the outcome of in-hospital resuscitation. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 11(1), 16–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eddy, D. M. (1996). Clinical Decision Making: From Theory to Practice, A Collection of Essays from JAMA. Boston: Jones and Bartlett.Google Scholar
Edwards, W. (1954). The theory of decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 380–417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, W. (1968). Conservatism in human information processing. In Formal Representation of Human Judgment, ed. Kleinmuntz, B.. New York: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 17–52.Google Scholar
Edwards, W., and Barron, F. H. (1994). SMARTS and SMARTER: Improved simple methods for multiattribute utility measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 60, 306–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichler, K., Puhan, M. A., Steurer, J.et al. (2007). Prediction of first coronary events with the Framingham score: A systematic review. American Heart Journal, 153(5), 722–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eighth Plenary Meeting of the Fifty-Seventh World Health Assembly in Geneva. (2005). Human organ and tissue transplantation. Transplantation, 79(6), 635.CrossRef
Elstein, A. S., Chapman, G. B., Chmiel, J. S.et al. (2004). Agreement between prostate cancer patients and their clinicians about utilities and attribute importance. Health Expectations, 7(2), 115–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elstein, A. S., Shulman, L. S., and Sprafka, S. A. (1978). Medical Problem Solving: An Analysis of Clinical Reasoning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewing, J. A. (1984). Detecting alcoholism: The CAGE questionnaire. Journal of the American Medical Association, 252(14), 1905–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Expert Choice. (2004). Expert Choice 11 [Computer software]. Arlington, VA: Author.
Fagan, T. J. (1975). Letter: Nomogram for Bayes theorem. New England Journal of Medicine, 293(5), 257.Google ScholarPubMed
Fagerlin, A., and Schneider, C. E. (2004). Enough: The failure of the living will. The Hastings Center Report, 34(2), 30–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feeny, D., Furlong, W., Boyle, M.et al. (1995). Multi-attribute health status classification systems: Health Utilities Index. PharmacoEconomics, 7(6), 490–502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Felli, J. C., and Hazen, G. B. (1998). Sensitivity analysis and the expected value of perfect information. Medical Decision Making, 18(1), 95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fleurence, R. L., and Torgerson, D. J. (2004). Setting priorities for research. Health Policy, 69(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Florance, V. (1996). Clinical extracts of biomedical literature for patient-centered problem solving. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 84, 375–85.Google ScholarPubMed
Fox, C. R., and Tversky, A. (1995). Ambiguity aversion and comparative ignorance. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 585–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, M., Mealing, S., Anderson, R.et al. (2006). The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization (biventricular pacing) for heart failure: A systematic review and economic model. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.Google Scholar
Frenck, R. W. Jr., Fathy, H. M., Sherif, M.et al. (2006). Sensitivity and specificity of various tests for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori in Egyptian children. Pediatrics, 118(4), 1195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, C., Gatti, G., Elstein, A.et al.(2001). Are clinicians correct when they believe they are correct? Implications for medical decision support. Medinfo, 10(Pt 1), 454–8.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. H., Connell, K. J., Olthoff, A. J.et al. (1998). Medical student errors in making a diagnosis. Academic Medicine, 73(10), S19–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Froberg, D. G., and Kane, R. L. (1989). Methodology for measuring health-state preferences. II. Scaling methods. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 42(5), 459–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fryback, D. G., Dasbach, E. J., Klein, R.et al.(1993). The Beaver Dam Health Outcomes Study: Initial catalog of health-state quality factors. Medical Decision Making, 13(2), 89–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fryback, D. G., and Lawrence, W. F. (1997). Dollars may not buy as many QALYs as we think: A problem with defining quality-of-life adjustments. Medical Decision Making, 17(3), 276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fryback, D. G., Lawrence, W. F., Martin, P. A.et al. (1997). Predicting quality of well-being scores from the SF-36: Results from the Beaver Dam Health Outcomes Study. Medical Decision Making, 17(1), 1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gallant, M. P. (2003). The influence of social support on chronic illness self-management: A review and directions for research. Health Education & Behavior, 30(2), 170–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gandjour, A. (2006). Consumption costs and earnings during added years of life: A reply to Nyman. Health Economics, 15(3), 315–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garg, A. X., Adhikari, N. K. J., McDonald, H.et al. (2005). Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: A systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Association. 293(10), 1223–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gigerenzer, G., and Hoffrage, U. (1995). How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats. Psychological Review, 102(4), 684–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gigerenzer, G., and Selten, R. (2001). Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Toolbox. Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G., Swijtink, Z., Porter, T.et al. (1989). The Empire of Chance. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gold, M. R., Siegel, J. E., Russell, L. B.et al., eds. (1996). Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldman, D. P., Joyce, G. F., and Zheng, Y. (2007). Prescription drug cost sharing: Associations with medication and medical utilization and spending and health. Journal of the American Medical Association, 298(1), 61–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Government of Western Australia Department of Health. (2002). Consent form for radical prostatectomy. Retrieved March 3, 2008 from http://www.health.wa.gov.au/safetyandquality/programs/adult/urology/radical%20prostatectomy.pdf
Gracia, C. R., and Barnhart, K. T. (2001). Diagnosing ectopic pregnancy: Decision analysis comparing six strategies. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 97(3), 464–70.Google ScholarPubMed
Green, D. M., and Swets, J. M. (1966). Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Greene, K. L., Meng, M. V., Elkin, E. P.et al.(2004). Validation of the Kattan preoperative nomogram for prostate cancer recurrence using a community based cohort: Results from cancer of the prostate strategic urological research endeavor (CaPSURE). Journal of Urology, 171(6 Pt 1), 2255–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, D., and Brenner, L. (2004). Perspectives on probability judgment calibration. Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 177–99.Google Scholar
Groopman, J. E. (2007). How Doctors Think. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Grouzet, F. M., Kasser, T., Ahuvia, A.et al. (2005). The structure of goal contents across 15 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(5), 800–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrison, J. D., Young, J. M., Butow, P.et al. (2005). Is it worth the risk? A systematic review of instruments that measure risk propensity for use in the health setting. Social Science & Medicine, 60(6), 1385–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haynes, R. B., McKibbon, K. A., Wilczynski, N. L.et al. (2005). Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies of treatment from Medline: Analytical survey. BMJ, 330(7501), 1179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haynes, R. B., and Wilczynski, N. L. (2004). Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies of diagnosis from Medline: Analytical survey. BMJ, 328(7447), 1040.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herold, R., and Becker, M. (2002). 13C-urea breath test threshold calculation and evaluation for the detection of Helicobacter pylori infection in children. BMC Gastroenterology, 2, 12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hershberger, P. J., Part, H. M., Markert, R. J.et al. (1994). Development of a test of cognitive bias in medical decision making. Academic Medicine, 69(10), 839–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hertwig, R., Barron, G., Weber, E. U.et al. (2004). Research article decisions from experience and the effect of rare events in risky choice. Psychological Science, 15(8), 534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Highhouse, S., and Hause, E. L. (1995). Missing information in selection: An application of the Einhorn-Hogarth ambiguity model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(1), 86–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschman, K. B., Kapo, J. M., and Karlawish, J. H. T. (2006). Why doesn't a family member of a person with advanced dementia use a substituted judgment when making a decision for that person? American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 14(8), 659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hogarth, R. M. (2001). Educating Intuition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hollon, M. F. (1999). Direct-to-consumer marketing of prescription drugs: Creating consumer demand. Journal of the American Medical Association. 281(4), 382–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howard, R. A. (1966). Information value theory. IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics, 2(1), 22–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphrey, L. L., Helfand, M., Chan, B. K. S.et al. (2002). Breast cancer screening: A summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Annals of Internal Medicine, 137(5 Part 1), 347–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunink, M. G. M. (2005). Decision making in the face of uncertainty and resource constraints: Examples from trauma imaging. Radiology, 235, 375–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hux, J. E., and Naylor, C. D. (1995). Communicating the benefits of chronic preventive therapy: Does the format of efficacy data determine patients' acceptance of treatment? Medical Decision Making, 15(2), 152–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, R. J., Moleski, R. J., and Meyerhoff, A. S. (2002). Valuation of symptomatic hepatitis A in adults: Estimates based on time trade-off and willingness-to-pay measurement. PharmacoEconomics, 20(11), 739–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, C., Carrin, G., Savedoff, W.et al. (2005). Clarifying efficiency-equity tradeoffs through explicit criteria, with a focus on developing countries. Health Care Analysis, 13(1), 33–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johannesson, M. (1995). Quality-adjusted life-years versus healthy-years equivalents: A comment. Journal of Health Economics, 14(1), 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johannesson, M., Meltzer, D., and O'Conor, R. M. (1997). Incorporating future costs in medical cost-effectiveness analysis: Implications for the cost-effectiveness of the treatment of hypertension. Medical Decision Making, 17(4), 382–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, J. H. (1993). Bad Blood: The Tuskegee Experiment. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, J. P., and Delmonico, F. L. (2004). The consequences of public policy to buy and sell organs for transplantation. American Journal of Transplantation, 4(2), 178–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: A perspective on intuitive judgment and choice. In Les Prix Nobel. The Nobel Prizes 2002, ed. Frangsmyr, T.. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., Fredrickson, B. L., Schreiber, C. A.et al. (1993). When more pain is preferred to less: Adding a better end. Psychological Science, 4(6), 401–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., and Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, R. M., Bush, J. W., and Berry, C. C. (1976). Health status: Types of validity and the index of well-being. Health Services Research, 11(4), 478–507.Google ScholarPubMed
Kareev, Y. (1992). Not that bad after all: Generation of random sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(4), 1189–94.Google Scholar
Kasser, T. (1996). Aspirations and well-being in a prison setting. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26(15), 1367–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasser, T., and Ryan, R. M. (1993). A dark side of the American dream: Correlates of financial success as a central life aspiration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(2), 410–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kasser, T., and Ryan, R. M. (1996). Further examining the American dream: Differential correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(3), 280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasser, T., and Ryan, R. M. (2001). Be careful what you wish for: Optimal functioning and the relative attainment of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. In Life Goals and Well-Being: Towards a Positive Psychology of Human Striving, eds. Schmuck, P. and Sheldon, K. M.. Cambridge: Hogrefe & Huber, pp. 116–31.Google Scholar
Kattan, M. W. (2003). Better predictions for patients. Family Urology, 8(3), 11–15.Google Scholar
Kattan, M. W., Eastham, J. A., Stapleton, A. M.et al. (1998). A preoperative nomogram for disease recurrence following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 90(10), 766.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katz, S., Ford, A. B., Moskowitz, R. W.et al. (1963). Studies of illness in the aged. The index of ADL: A standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. Journal of the American Medical Association, 185, 914–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keeney, R. L., and Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value trade-offs. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Keller, S. D., Kosinski, M., and Ware, J. E. (1996). A 12-item short-form health survey (SF-12): A construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Medical Care, 32(3), 220–3.Google Scholar
Kern, L., and Doherty, M. E. (1982). “Pseudodiagnosticity” in an idealized medical problem-solving environment. Journal of Medical Education, 57(2), 100–4.Google Scholar
Khushf, G., ed. (2004). Handbook of Bioethics: Taking Stock of the Field from a Philosophical Perspective. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kind, P. (1996). The EuroQoL instrument: An index of health-related quality of life. In Quality of Life and PharmacoEconomics in Clinical Trials, 2nd edn., Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven, pp. 191–201.Google Scholar
King, J. T., Styn, M. M. A.Jr, and Tsevat, J. (2003). Perfect health versus disease free: The impact of anchor point choice on the measurement of preferences and the calculation of disease-specific disutilities. Medical Decision Making, 23(3), 212–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koehler, D. J., Brenner, L., and Griffin, D. (2002). The calibration of expert judgment: Heuristics and biases beyond the laboratory. In Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment, ed. Gilovich, T., Griffin, D. W. and Kahneman, D.. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 489–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koriat, A., Lichtenstein, S., and Fischhoff, B. (1980). Reasons for overconfidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 107–18.Google Scholar
Kramer, K. M., Bennett, C. L., Pickard, A. S.et al. (2005). Patient preferences in prostate cancer: A clinician's guide to understanding health utilities. Clinical Prostate Cancer, 4(1), 15–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuhn, K. M. (1997). Communicating uncertainty: Framing effects on responses to vague probabilities. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 71(1), 55–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawton, M. P., and Brody, E. M. (1969). Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist, 9, 179–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lench, H. C., and Levine, L. J. (2005). Effects of fear on risk and control judgements and memory: Implications for health promotion messages. Cognition & Emotion, 19(7), 1049–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenert, L. A., Sturley, A., and Watson, M. E. (2002). iMPACT3: Internet-Based Development and Administration of Utility Elicitation Protocols. Medical Decision Making, 22(6), 464–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lenton, A. P., Blair, I. V., and Hastie, R. (2006). The influence of social categories and patient responsibility on health care allocation decisions: Bias or fairness? Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 28(1), 27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, J. S., and Keltner, D. (2001). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 146–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levin, I. P., and Gaeth, G. J. (1988). How consumers are affected by the framing of attribute information before and after consuming the product. The Journal of Consumer Research, 15(3), 374–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipkus, I. M., and Hollands, J. G. (1999). The visual communication of risk. Monographs of the National Cancer Institute, 25, 149–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd-Jones, D. M., Wilson, P. W. F., Larson, M. L.et al. (2004). Framingham risk score and prediction of lifetime risk for coronary heart disease. The American Journal of Cardiology, 94(1), 20–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luce, R. D., and Fishburn, P. C. (1991). Rank-and sign-dependent linear utility models for finite first-order gambles. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 4(1), 29–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddigan, S. L., Feeny, D. H., and Johnson, J. A. (2004). Construct validity of the RAND-12 and Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and 3 in type 2 diabetes. Quality of Life Research, 13(2), 435–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maikranz, J. M., Steele, R. G., Dreyer, M. L.et al. (2006). The relationship of hope and illness-related uncertainty to emotional adjustment and adherence among pediatric renal and liver transplant recipients. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 32(5), 571–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marbella, A. M., Desbiens, N. A., Mueller-Rizner, N.et al. (1998). Surrogates' agreement with patients' resuscitation preferences: Effect of age, relationship, and SUPPORT intervention. Study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatment. Journal of Critical Care, 13(3), 140–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marvel, M. K., Doherty, W. J., and Weiner, E. (1998). Medical interviewing by exemplary family physicians. Journal of Family Practice, 47(5), 343–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Mauskopf, J., Rutten, F., and Schonfeld, W. (2003). Cost-effectiveness league tables: Valuable guidance for decision makers? PharmacoEconomics, 21(14), 991.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKie, J., and Richardson, J. (2003). The rule of rescue. Social Science & Medicine, 56(12), 2407–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNeil, B. J., Pauker, S. G., Sox, H. C.et al. (1982). On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. New England Journal of Medicine, 306(21), 1259–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mehrez, A., and Gafni, A. (1989). Quality-adjusted life years, utility theory, and healthy-years equivalents. Medical Decision Making, 9(2), 142–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mellers, B. A. (2000). Choice and the relative pleasure of consequences. Psychological Bulletin, 126(6), 910–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meltzer, D. (1997). Accounting for future costs in medical cost-effectiveness analysis. Journal of Health Economics, 16(1), 33–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meltzer, D. (2001). Addressing uncertainty in medical cost-effectiveness analysis: Implications of expected utility maximization for methods to perform sensitivity analysis and the use of cost-effectiveness analysis to set priorities for medical research. Journal of Health Economics, 20(1), 109–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meltzer, D., Basu, A., and Egleston, B. (2001). Early results from a prostate cancer decision model. Medical Decision Making, 21, 517.Google Scholar
Menzel, P., Gold, M. R., Nord, E.et al. (1999). Toward a broader view of values in cost-effectiveness analysis in health. Hastings Center Report, 29(3), 7–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintzes, B., Barer, M. L., Kravitz, R. L.et al. (2002). Influence of direct to consumer pharmaceutical advertising and patients' requests on prescribing decisions: Two site cross sectional survey. BMJ, 324(7332), 278–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miyamoto, J. (2000). Utility assessment under expected utility and rank dependent utility assumptions. In Decision Making in Health Care: Theory, Psychology, and Applications, ed. Chapman, G. B. and Sonnenberg, F.. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 65–109.Google Scholar
Miyamoto, J. M., Wakker, P. P., Bleichrodt, H.et al. (1998). The zero-condition: A simplifying assumption in QALY measurement and multiattribute utility. Management Science, 44(6), 839–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mookadam, F., and Arthur, H. M. (2004). Social support and its relationship to morbidity and mortality after acute myocardial infarction: Systematic overview. Archives of Internal Medicine, 164(14), 1514–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, A. H., and Winkler, R. L. (1982). Subjective probabilistic tornado forecasts: Some experimental results. Monthly Weather Review, 110(9), 1288–97.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, A. H., and Winkler, R. L. (1984). Probability forecasting in meterology. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79(387), 489–500.Google Scholar
Murphy, T. F. (2002). The ethics of multiple vital organ transplants. Hastings Center Report, 32(2), 47–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, T. F. (2006). Would my story get me a kidney? Hastings Center Report, 36(2), 49–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Safety Council. (2003). Odds of dying. Retrieved January 3, 2005, from http://www.nsc.org/lrs/statinfo/odds.htm.
Nease, R. F. (1997). Use of influence diagrams to structure medical decisions. Medical Decision Making, 17(3), 263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nord, E. (2005). Concerns for the worse off: Fair innings versus severity. Social Science & Medicine, 60(2), 257–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nord, E., Pinto, J. L., Richardson, J.et al. (1999). Incorporating societal concerns for fairness in numerical valuations of health programmes. Health Economics, 8(1), 25–39.3.0.CO;2-H>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nunes, T., Schliemann, A. D., and Carraher, D. W. (1993). Street Mathematics and School Mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nyman, J. A. (2004). Should the consumption of survivors be included as a cost in cost-utility analysis? Health Economics, 13(5), 417–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyman, J. A. (2006). More on survival consumption costs in cost-utility analysis. Health Economics, 15(3), 319–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Connor, A. M., Jacobsen, M. J., and Stacey, D. (2006). Ottawa Personal Decision Guide. Retrieved August 5, 2007, from http://decisionaid.ohri.ca/decguide.html.
Owens, D. K., Shachter, R. D., and Nease, R. F. (1997). Representation and analysis of medical decision problems with influence diagrams. Medical Decision Making, 17(3), 241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parducci, A. (1965). Category judgment: A range-frequency model. Psychological Review, 72(6), 407–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parducci, A., and Perrett, L. F. (1971). Category rating scales: Effects of relative spacing and frequency of stimulus values. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 427–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patrick, D. L., and Deyo, R. A. (1989). Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life. Medical Care, 27(3 Suppl), S217–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paulos, J. A. (1988). Innumeracy: Mathematical Illiteracy and Its Consequences. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Paulos, J. A. (1991). Beyond Innumeracy. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Peters, E., McCaul, K. D., Stefanek, M.et al. (2006). A heuristics approach to understanding cancer risk perception: Contributions from judgment and decision-making research. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 31(1), 45–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poses, R. M., Cebul, R. D., Collins, M.et al. (1985). The accuracy of experienced physicians' probability estimates for patients with sore throats: Implications for decision making. Journal of the American Medical Association, 254(7), 925–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Praseedom, R. K., McNeil, K. D., Watson, C. J. E.et al. (2001). Combined transplantation of the heart, lung, and liver. The Lancet, 358(9284), 812–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prosser, L. A., and Wittenberg, E. (2007). Do risk attitudes differ across domains and respondent types? Medical Decision Making, 27(3), 281–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Radcliffe-Richards, J., Daar, A. S., Guttmann, R. D.et al. (1998). The case for allowing kidney sales. The Lancet, 351(9120), 1950–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Redelmeier, D. A., and Kahneman, D. (1996). Patients'memories of painful medical treatments: Real-time and retrospective evaluations of two minimally invasive procedures. Pain, 66(1), 3–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Redelmeier, D. A., Katz, J., and Kahneman, D. (2003). Memories of colonoscopy: A randomized trial. Pain, 104(1–2), 187–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Redelmeier, D. A., Koehler, D. J., Liberman, V.et al. (1995). Probability judgment in medicine: Discounting unspecified possibilities. Medical Decision Making, 15(3), 227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rein, D. B., Hicks, K. A., Wirth, K. E.et al. (2007). Cost-effectiveness of routine childhood vaccination for hepatitis A in the United States. Pediatrics, 119(1), e12–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reyna, V. F. (2004). How people make decisions that involve risk: A dual-processes approach. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(2), 60–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reyna, V. F., and Adam, M. B. (2003). Fuzzy-trace theory, risk communication, and product labeling in sexually transmitted diseases. Risk Analysis, 23(2), 325–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reyna, V. F., and Lloyd, F. J. (2006). Physician decision making and cardiac risk: Effects of knowledge, risk perception, risk tolerance, and fuzzy processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 12(3), 179–95.Google ScholarPubMed
Rickham, P. P. (1964). Human experimentation. Code of ethics of the World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki. British Medical Journal, 5402, 177.Google Scholar
Ritov, I., and Baron, J. (1990). Reluctance to vaccinate: Omission bias and ambiguity. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 3(4), 263–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rottenstreich, Y., and Tversky, A. (1997). Unpacking, repacking, and anchoring: Advances in support theory. Psychological Review, 104(2), 406–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Saaty, T. L., and Vargas, L. G. (2001). Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Boston: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sackett, D. L. (1992). The rational clinical examination: A primer on the precision and accuracy of the clinical examination. Journal of the American Medical Association, 267(19), 2638–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sandman, P. M., Weinstein, N. D., and Miller, P. (1994). High risk or low: How location on a risk ladder affects perceived risk. Risk Analysis, 14(1), 35–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savage, L. J. (1954). The Foundations of Statistics. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Scheper-Hughes, N. (2003). Keeping an eye on the global traffic in human organs. The Lancet, 361(9369), 1645–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, D. D. (1978). The family as the unit of medical care. Journal of Family Practice, 7(2), 303–13.Google ScholarPubMed
Schorling, J. B. (2005). Review: Sensitivity of the CAGE questionnaire for the DSM diagnosis of alcohol abuse and dependence in general clinical populations was 71% at cut points>= 2. BMJ, 10(1), 26.Google Scholar
Schwappach, D. L. B. (2002). Resource allocation, social values and the QALY: A review of the debate and empirical evidence. Health Expectations, 5(3), 210–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, A. (2000). Diagnostic test calculator. Retrieved March 3, 2008, from http://araw.mede.uic.edu/cgi-bin/testcalc.pl.
Schwartz, A., and Hasnain, M. (2002). Risk perception and risk attitude in informed consent. Risk, Decision, and Policy, 7, 121–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, A., Hazen, G., Leifer, A.et al. (in press). Life goals and health decisions—What will people live (or die) for? Medical Decision Making.Google Scholar
Schwartz, J. A., and Chapman, G. B. (1999). Are more options always better?: The attraction effect in physicians' decisions about medications. Medical Decision Making, 19(3), 315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sevdalis, N., and Harvey, N. (2006). Predicting preferences: A neglected aspect of shared decision-making. Health Expectations, 9, 245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shalowitz, D. I., Garrett-Mayer, E., and Wendler, D. (2006). The accuracy of surrogate decision makers a systematic review. Archives of Internal Medicine, 166(5), 493–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shickle, D. (1997). Public preferences for health care: Prioritisation in the United Kingdom. Bioethics, 11(3–4), 277–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shuster, E. (1997). Fifty years later: The significance of the Nuremberg Code. New England Journal of Medicine, 337(20), 1436–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siddique, R., Ricci, J. A., Stewart, W. F.et al. (2002). Quality of life in a U.S. national sample of adults with diabetes and motility-related upper gastrointestinal symptoms. Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 47(4), 683–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sieck, W. R., and Arkes, H. R. (2005). The recalcitrance of overconfidence and its contribution to decision aid neglect. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18(1), 29–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slovic, P., Fischoff, B., Lichtenstein, S.et al.(1981). Perceived risk: Psychological factors and social implications (and discussion). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 376(1764), 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, D. M., Sherriff, R. L., Damschroder, L.et al. (2006). Misremembering colostomies? Former patients give lower utility ratings than do current patients. Health Psychology, 25(6), 688–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sonnenberg, F. A., and Beck, J. R. (1993). Markov models in medical decision making: A practical guide. Medical Decision Making, 13(4), 322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stalmeier, P., Chapman, G. B., Boer, A.et al. (2001). A fallacy of the multiplicative QALY model for low-quality weights in students and patients judging hypothetical health states. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 17(4), 488–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stalmeier, P. F. M. (2002). Discrepancies between chained and classic utilities induced by anchoring with occasional adjustments. Medical Decision Making, 22(1), 53–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stange, K. C. (2007). Time to ban direct-to-consumer prescription drug marketing. Annals of Family Medicine, 5(2), 101–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stewart, T. R., Roebber, P. J., and Bosart, L. F. (1997). The importance of the task in analyzing expert judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69(3), 205–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiggelbout, A. M., Elstein, A. S., Molewijk, B.et al.(2006). Clinical ethical dilemmas: Convergent and divergent views of two scholarly communities. Journal of Medical Ethics, 32(7), 381–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Straus, S. E. (2002). Individualizing treatment decisions: The likelihood of being helped or harmed. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 25(2), 210–24.Google ScholarPubMed
Straus, S. E., Richardson, S. R., Glasziou, P.et al. (2005). Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and teach EBM, 3rd edn. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
Sutherland, H. J., Llewellyn-Thomas, H. A., Boyd, N. F.et al. (1982). Attitudes towards quality of survival: The concept of maximal endurable time. Medical Decision Making, 2(3), 299–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teigen, K., and Brun, W. (1999). The directionality of verbal probability expressions: Effects on decisions, predictions, and probabilistic reasoning. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 80(2), 155–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Torrance, G. W., Thomas, W. H., and Sackett, D. L. (1972). A utility maximization method for evaluation of health care programs. Health Services Research, 7, 118–33.Google Scholar
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1983). Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological Review, 90(4), 293–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A., and Koehler, D. J. (1994). Support theory: A nonextensional representation of subjective probability. Psychological Review, 101(4), 547–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. (1979). The Belmont Report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Retrieved August 15,2007, from http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.htm.
Ubel, P. A., DeKay, M. L., Baron, J.et al. (1996). Cost-effectiveness analysis in a setting of budget constraints: Is it equitable? New England Journal of Medicine, 334(18), 1174–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryn, M., and Burke, J. (2000). The effect of patient race and socio-economic status on physicians' perceptions of patients. Social Science & Medicine, 50(6), 813–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Voltaire, (1772). La bégueule: conte moral [sn].
Neumann, J., and Morgenstern, O. (1953). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Winterfeldt, D., and Edwards, W. (1986). Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wagstaff, A. (1991). QALYs and the equity-efficiency trade-off. Journal of Health Economics, 10(1), 21–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallsten, T. S. (1981). Physician and medical student bias in evaluating diagnostic information. Medical Decision Making, 1(2), 145–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., Dewey, J. E.et al. (2001). How to score and interpret single-item health status measures: A manual for users of the SF-8 Health Survey. Lincoln, RI: Quality-Metric Incorporated.Google Scholar
Ware, J. E., Snow, K. K., Kosinski, M.et al. (1993). SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center.Google Scholar
Ware, J. E. Jr., and Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30(6), 473–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wear, S. (2004). Informed consent. In Handbook of Bioethics: Taking Stock of the Field from a Philosophical Perspective, ed. Khushf, G.. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, pp. 251–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, E. U., Blais, A. R., and Betz, N. E. (2002). A domain-specific risk-attitude scale: Measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15(4), 263–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, E. U., Böckenholt, U. L. F., Hilton, D. J.et al. (2000). Confidence judgments as expressions of experienced decision conflict. Risk, Decision and Policy, 5(01), 69–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinstein, M. C., Fineberg, H. V., and Elstein, A. S. (1980). Clinical Decision Analysis. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders.Google Scholar
Wenger, N. K., and Furberg, C. D. (1990). Cardiovascular disorders. In Quality of Life Assessments in Clinical Trials. New York: Raven Press, pp. 335–45.Google Scholar
Williams, A. (1997). Intergenerational equity: An exploration of the “fair innings” argument. Health Economics, 6(2), 117–32.3.0.CO;2-B>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, P. W. F., D'Agostino, R. B., Levy, D.et al. (1998). Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. Circulation, 97(18), 1837–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolf, F. M., Gruppen, L. D., and Billi, J. E. (1985). Differential diagnosis and the competing-hypotheses heuristic: A practical approach to judgment under uncertainty and Bayesian probability. Journal of the American Medical Association, 253(19), 2858–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yaniv, I. (2004). The benefit of additional opinions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(2), 75–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yokota, F., and Thompson, K. M. (2004). Value of information literature analysis: A review of applications in health risk management. Medical Decision Making, 24, 287–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zaner, R. (2004). Physicians and patients in relation. In Handbook of Bioethics: Taking Stock of the Field from a Philosophical Perspective, ed. Khushf, G.. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, pp. 223–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zink, S., Wertlieb, S., Catalano, J.et al. (2005). Examining the potential exploitation of UNOS policies. American Journal of Bioethics, 5(4), 6–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Alan Schwartz, University of Illinois, Chicago, George Bergus, University of Iowa
  • Book: Medical Decision Making
  • Online publication: 04 May 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511722080.017
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Alan Schwartz, University of Illinois, Chicago, George Bergus, University of Iowa
  • Book: Medical Decision Making
  • Online publication: 04 May 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511722080.017
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Alan Schwartz, University of Illinois, Chicago, George Bergus, University of Iowa
  • Book: Medical Decision Making
  • Online publication: 04 May 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511722080.017
Available formats
×