Ainsworth, P. M. (2009). “Newman’s objection,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60: 1–37.
Anderson, C. A. (1989). “Russell on order in time,” in Savage and Anderson (1989: 249–63).
Beck, L. W. (1950). “Constructions and inferred entities,” Philosophy of Science 17: 74–86.
Bell, D. (1990). “How ‘Russellian’ was Frege?,” Mind 99: 267–77.
Bell, J. L. (1995). “Type-reducing correspondences and well-orderings: Frege’s and Zermelo’s constructions re-examined,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 60: 209–21.
Bell, J. L. (1999a). “Frege’s theorem in a constructive setting,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 64: 486–8.
Bell, J. L. (1999b). “Finite sets and Frege structures,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 64: 1552–6.
Benacerraf, P. (1981). “Frege: the last logicist,” in P. Frenchet al. (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy, vol. vi (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press): 17–35, reprinted in Demopoulos (1995: 41–67).
Bernays, P. (1935). “Sur le platonisme dans les mathématiques,” L’Enseignement Mathématique 34: 52–69, trans. C. Parsons as “On Platonism in mathematics,” reprinted in Putnam and Benacerraf (1983: 258–71).
Boolos, G. (1985). “Reading the Begriffsschrift,” Mind 94: 331–44, reprinted in Demopoulos (1995: 163–81) and in Boolos (1998: 155–70).
Boolos, G. (1987). “The consistency of Frege’s Foundations of Arithmetic,” reprinted in Demopoulos (1995: 211–33) and in Boolos (1998: 183–201).
Boolos, G. (1990). “The standard of equality of numbers,” reprinted in Demopoulos (1995: 234–56) and in Boolos (1998: 202–19).
Boolos, G. (1994). “The advantages of honest toil over theft,” reprinted in Boolos (1998: 255–74).
Boolos, G. (1998). Logic, Logic, and Logic (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
Bottazzini, U. (1986). The Higher Calculus: A History of Real and Complex Analysis from Euler to Weierstrass (Berlin and New York: Springer-Verlag).
Braithwaite, R. B. (1953). Scientific Explanation: A Study of the Function of Theory, Probability and Law in Science (Cambridge University Press).
Braithwaite, R. B. (ed.) (1931). The Foundations of Mathematics and other Logical Essays by Frank Plumpton Ramsey (Paterson, NJ: Littlefield and Adams).
Burge, T. (2005). “Frege on apriority (2000),” in T. Burge, Truth, Thought, Reason: Essays on Frege (Oxford University Press): 356–89.
Burgess, J. P. (1993). “Hintikka et Sandu versus Frege in re arbitrary functions,” Philosophia Mathematica series iii, 1: 50–65.
Burgess, J. P. (2005). Fixing Frege (Princeton University Press).
Carnap, R. (1928). Der logisches Aufbau der Welt, trans. R. A. George as The Logical Structure of the World (University of California Press, 1967).
Carnap, R. (1931). “The logicist foundations of mathematics,” trans. E. Putnam and G. Massey, reprinted in Putnam and Benacerraf (1983: 41–51).
Carnap, R. (1934). Logical Syntax of Language, trans. A. Smeaton (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1937).
Carnap, R. (1939). Foundations of Logic and Mathematics, in International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, vol. i, part 1 (University of Chicago Press): 139–213.
Carnap, R. (1942). Introduction to Semantics (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
Carnap, R. (1950). “Empiricism, semantics and ontology,” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 4: 20–40, revised and reprinted in R. Carnap, Meaning and Necessity: A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic (University of Chicago Press, 1956, enlarged edn): 204–21. Page references are to the 1956 reprinting.
Carnap, R. (1963a). “Intellectual autobiography,” in Schilpp (1963: 3–84).
Carnap, R. (1963b). “Replies and systematic expositions,” in Schilpp (1963: 859–1013).
Carnap, R. (1966). Philosophical Foundations of Physics: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science, ed. Martin Gardner (New York: Basic Books).
Carnap, R. (1995). An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science, ed. M. Gardner (New York: Dover), reprint of the second (1974) edn of Carnap (1966).
Cartwright, R. (1987). “On the origin of Russell’s theory of descriptions,” in R. Cartwright, Philosophical Papers (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press): 95–134.
Carus, A. (2007). Carnap and Twentieth-Century Thought: Explication as Enlightenment (Cambridge University Press).
Chalmers, A. (2011). “Drawing philosophical lessons from Perrin’s experiments on Brownian motion: a response to van Fraassen,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62: 711–32.
Chambers, T. (2000). “A quick reply to Putnam’s paradox,” Mind 109: 195–7.
Church, A. (1984). “Russell’s theory of identity of propositions,” Philosophia Naturalis 21: 513–22.
Coffa, A. (1982). “Kant, Bolzano and the emergence of logicism,” Journal of Philosophy 74: 679–89, reprinted in Demopoulos (1995: 29–40).
Craig, W. and R. L. Vaught (1958). “Finite axiomatizability using additional predicates,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 23: 289–308.
Dedekind, R. (1872). “Continuity and irrational numbers,” in Dedekind (1963: 1–27).
Dedekind, R. (1888). “The nature and meaning of numbers,” in Dedekind (1963: 31–115).
Dedekind, R. (1890). “Letter to Keferstein,” trans. S. Bauer-Mengelberg and H. Wang, reprinted in van Heijenoort (1967: 98–103).
Dedekind, R. (1963). Essays on the Theory of Numbers, trans. W. W. Beman (New York: Dover).
Demopoulos, W. (1994). “Frege and the rigorization of analysis,” Journal of Philosophical Logic 23: 225–45, reprinted in Demopoulos (1995: 68–88).
Demopoulos, W. (1999). “On the theory of meaning of ‘On denoting,’” Noûs 33: 439–58.
Demopoulos, W. (2003a). “On the rational reconstruction of our theoretical knowledge,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54: 371–403.
Demopoulos, W. (2003b). “Russell’s structuralism and the absolute description of the world,” in N. Griffin (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Russell (Cambridge University Press): 392–419.
Demopoulos, W. (2007). “Carnap on the rational reconstruction of scientific theories,” in Friedman and Creath (2007: 248–72).
Demopoulos, W. (2011). “On logicist conceptions of functions and classes,” in D. DeVidi, M. Hallett, and P. J. Clark (eds.), Vintage Enthusiasms: Essays in Honour of John L. Bell (Dordrecht: Springer): 3–18.
Demopoulos, W. (2011). “Three views of theoretical knowledge,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62: 177–205.
Demopoulos, W. (2011). “On extending ‘Empiricism, semantics and ontology’ to the realism-instrumentalism controversy,” Journal of Philosophy 108: 647–69.
Demopoulos, W. (ed.) (1995). Frege’s Philosophy of Mathematics (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
Demopoulos, W. and J. L. Bell (1993). “Frege’s theory of concepts and objects and the interpretation of second-order logic,” Philosophia Mathematica series iii, 1: 139–56.
Demopoulos, W. and P. J. Clark (2005). “The logicism of Frege, Dedekind, and Russell,” in S. Shapiro (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mathematics and Logic (Oxford University Press): 129–65.
Demopoulos, W., M. Frappier, and J. Bub (2012). “Poincaré’s ‘Les conceptions nouvelle de la matière’,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 43: 221–5.
Demopoulos, W. and M. Friedman (1985). “Bertrand Russell’s The Analysis of Matter: its historical context and contemporary interest,” Philosophy of Science 52: 621–39.
DePierris, G. (2012). “Hume on space, geometry, and diagrammatic reasoning,” Synthese 186: 169–90.
DeVidi, D. and G. Solomon (1994). “Geometric conventionalism and Carnap’s principle of tolerance,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 25: 773–83.
DeVidi, D. and G. Solomon (1995). “Tolerance and metalanguages in Carnap’s Logical Syntax of Language,” Synthese 103: 123–39.
DeVidi, D. and G. Solomon (1999). “Tarski on ‘essentially richer’ metalanguages,” Journal of Philosophical Logic 28: 1–28.
DeVidi, R. (1996). “Frege on Indexicals: Sense and Context Sensitivity,” doctoral dissertation, University of Western Ontario.
DiSalle, R. (2002). “Conventionalism and modern physics: a re-assessment,” Noûs 36: 169–200.
DeVidi, R. (2006). Understanding Space-time: The Philosophical Development of Physics from Newton to Einstein (Cambridge University Press).
Dummett, M. (1981). Frege: Philosophy of Language (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, second edn).
Dummett, M. (1982). “Frege and Kant on geometry,” Inquiry 25: 233–54, reprinted in Dummett (1991c): 126–57.
Dummett, M. (1991a). Frege: Philosophy of Mathematics (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
Dummett, M. (1991b). The Logical Basis of Metaphysics: The William James Lectures, 1976 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
Dummett, M. (1991c). Frege and Other Philosophers (Oxford University Press).
Dummett, M. (1998). “Neo-Fregeans: in bad company?,” in Schirn (1998: 369–88).
Dummett, M. (2007). “Reply to Jan Dejnozka,” in R. E. Auxier and L. E. Hahn (eds.), The Philosophy of Michael Dummett (Chicago and La Salle, IL: Open Court): 114–26.
Einstein, A. (1905). “On the electrodynamics of moving bodies,” trans. W. Perrett and G. B. Jeffrey, reprinted in A. Einsteinet al. (eds.), The Principle of Relativity (New York: Dover, 1952): 37–65.
Einstein, A. (1921). “Address to the Prussian Academy,” trans. S. Bargmann as “Geometry and experience,” reprinted in A. Einstein, Sidelights on Relativity (New York: E. P. Dutton and Co., 1923): 27–45.
Enderton, H. (1972). A Mathematical Introduction to Logic (New York: Academic Press).
English, J. (1973). “Underdetermination: Craig and Ramsey,” Journal of Philosophy 70: 453–61.
Feferman, S. (1986). “Introductory note to 1931c,” in Feferman et al. (1986: 208–13).
Feferman, S.et al. (eds.) (1986). Kurt Gödel: Collected Works, vol. i (Oxford University Press).
Feferman, S. (eds.) (1990). Kurt Gödel: Collected Works, vol. ii (Oxford University Press).
Feigl, H. (1950). “Existential hypotheses,” Philosophy of Science 17: 192–223.
Feynman, R. (1963). Lectures on Physics, vol. i (New York: Addison-Wesley).
Frapolli, M. J. (ed.) (2005). F. P. Ramsey: Critical Reassessments (London: Continuum Studies in British Philosophy).
Frege, G. (1874). Dissertation for the venia docendi in the Philosophical Faculty of Jena, trans. H. Kaal, as “Methods of calculation based on an extension of the concept of quantity,” reprinted in McGuinness (1984: 56–92).
Frege, G. (1879). Begriffsschrift: eine der arithmetischen nachgebildete Formelsprache des reinen Denkens, trans. S. Bauer-Mengelberg as Begriffsschrift: A Formula Language, Modeled upon that of Arithmetic, for Pure Thought, reprinted in van Heijenoort (1967: 5–82).
Frege, G. (1880/1). “Booles rechnende Logik und die Begriffsschrift,” in H. Hermeset al. (eds.), Gottlob Frege: Nachgelassene Schriften (Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1983): 9–52, trans. P. White and R. Hargreaves as “Boole’s logical calculus and the concept-script,” in H. Hermeset al. (eds.), Gottlob Frege: Posthumous Writings (University of Chicago Press, 1980): 9–46.
Frege, G. (1884). Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik, trans. J. L. Austin as The Foundations of Arithmetic: A Logico-Mathematical Enquiry into the Concept of Number (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1980).
Frege, G. (1891). Function and Concept, trans. P. Geach, in McGuinness (1984: 137–56).
Frege, G. (1893–1903). Grundgesetze der Arithmetik, partially trans. M. Furth as The Basic Laws of Arithmetic: Exposition of the System (University of California Press, 1964).
Frege, G. (1897). “Logic,” in H. Hermeset al. (eds.), Gottlob Frege: Posthumous Writings (University of Chicago Press, 1980): 126–51.
Frege, G. (1904). “What is a function?,” trans. P. Geach, in McGuinness (1984: 285–91).
Freudenthal, H. (1962). “The main trends in the foundations of geometry in the 19th Century,” in E. Nagelet al. (eds.), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science: Proceedings of the 1960 International Congress (Stanford University Press): 613–21.
Friedman, M. (2001). Dynamics of Reason (Stanford: CSLI).
Friedman, M. (2006). “Carnap and Quine: twentieth century echoes of Kant and Hume,” Philosophical Topics 34: 35–58.
Friedman, M. (2012). “Carnap’s philosophical neutrality between realism and instrumentalism,” in M. Frappier, D. Brown, and R. DiSalle (eds.), Analysis and Interpretation in the Exact Sciences: Essays in Honour of William Demopoulos (Dordrecht: Springer): 95–114.
Friedman, M. and R. Creath (eds.) (2007). The Cambridge Companion to Carnap (Cambridge University Press).
GardnerM. (1979). “Realism and instrumentalism in 19th century atomism,” Philosophy of Science 46: 1–34.
Geach, P. (1976). “Critical notice of Michael Dummett, Frege: Philosophy of Language,” Mind 85: 436–49.
Gödel, K. (1944). “Russell’s mathematical logic,” reprinted in Feferman et al. (1990: 119–41).
Goldfarb, W. (1979). “Logic in the twenties: the nature of the quantifier,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 44: 351–68.
Goldfarb, W. (1989). “Russell’s reasons for ramification,” in Savage and Anderson (1989: 24–40).
Goldfarb, W. (1997). “Semantics in Carnap: a rejoinder to Alberto Coffa,” Philosophical Topics 25: 51–66.
Goldfarb, W. and T. Ricketts (1992). “Carnap and the philosophy of mathematics,” in D. Bell and W. Vossenkuhl (eds.), Science and Subjectivity (Berlin: Akademie Verlag): 61–78.
Grabiner, Judith (1981). The Origins of Cauchy’s Rigorous Calculus (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
Gupta, A. (2006). Empiricism and Experience (Oxford University Press).
Gupta, A. and N. Belnap (1993). The Revision Theory of Truth (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
Hale, B. (1994). “Dummett’s critique of Wright’s attempt to resuscitate Frege,” Philosophia Mathematica series iii, 2: 122–47.
Hallett, M. (1984). Cantorian Set Theory and Limitation of Size (Oxford University Press).
Hallett, M. (1990). “Physicalism, reduction and Hilbert,” in A. D. Irvine (ed.), Physicalism in Mathematics (Dordrecht: Kluwer): 183–258.
Heck, R. (1995). “Definition by induction in Frege’s Grundgesetze der Arithmetik,” in Demopoulos (1995: 295–333).
Heck, R. and J. Stanley (1993). “Reply to Hintikka and Sandu: Frege and second-order logic,” Journal of Philosophy 90: 416–24.
Hempel, C. G. (1958/1965). “The theoretician’s dilemma: a study in the logic of theory construction,” in H. Feigl and G. Maxwell (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. ii (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1958): 37–98, reprinted with minor alterations in C. G. Hempel, Aspects of Scientific Explanation (New York: The Free Press, 1965): 173–226. Page references are to the 1965 reprinting.
Hempel, C. G. (1963). “Implications of Carnap’s work for the philosophy of science,” in Schilpp (1963: 685–710).
Hilbert, D. (1904). “On the foundations of mathematics,” trans. S. Bauer-Mengelberg, reprinted in van Heijenoort (1967: 129–38).
Hilbert, D. (1925). “On the infinite,” trans. S. Bauer-Mengelberg, reprinted in van Heijenoort (1967: 367–92).
Hintikka, J. and G. Sandu (1992). “The skeleton in Frege’s cupboard: the standard versus nonstandard distinction,” Journal of Philosophy 89: 290–315.
Hume, D. (1739). Treatise of Human Nature, ed. L. A. Selby-Bigge (Oxford University Press, 1888).
Isaacson, D. (1992). “Some considerations on arithmetical truth and the ω-rule,” in M. Detlefsen (ed.) Proof, Logic and Formalization (London and New York: Routledge): 94–138.
Jeshion, R. (2001). “Frege’s notions of self-evidence,” Mind 110: 937–76.
Kant, I. (1787). Kritik der reinen Vernunft, trans. N. K. Smith as Immanuel Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason (London: Macmillan, 1956).
Keenan, E. (2001). “Logical objects,” in C. A. Anderson and M. Zeleny (eds.), Logic, Meaning and Computation: Essays in Memory of Alonzo Church (Dordrecht: Kluwer): 149–80.
Ketland, J. (2004). “Empirical adequacy and ramsification,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55: 287–300.
Kitcher, P. (1979). “Frege’s epistemology,” Philosophical Review 88: 235–63.
Klement, K. C. (2001). “Russell’s paradox in Appendix B of The Principles of Mathematics: was Frege’s response adequate?” History and Philosophy of Logic 22: 13–28.
Klement, K. C. (2002). Frege and the Logic of Sense and Reference (London: Routledge).
Lewis, D. (1970). “How to define theoretical terms,” Journal of Philosophy 67: 427–45.
Lillehammer, H. and H. Mellor (eds.) (2005). Ramsey’s Legacy (Oxford University Press).
Linsky, B. (1999). Russell’s Metaphysical Logic (Stanford: CSLI).
Linsky, L. (1987). “Russell’s no-classes theory of classes,” in J. J. Thompson (ed.), Being and Saying: Essays in Honor of Richard Cartwright (Cambridge, MA: MIT): 21–40.
Maddy, P. (2001). “Naturalism: friends and foes,” Philosophical Perspectives 15: 37–67.
Maddy, P. (2008). Second Philosophy: A Naturalistic Method (Oxford University Press).
Maxwell, G. (1968). “Scientific methodology and the causal theory of perception,” in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.), Problems in the Philosophy of Science (Amsterdam: North-Holland): 148–60.
Maxwell, G. (1970). “Structural realism and the meaning of theoretical terms,” in M. Radner and S. Winokur (eds.), Analyses of Theories and Methods of Physics and Psychology, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. iv (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press): 181–92.
McGuinness, B. (ed.) (1980). Gottlob Frege: Philosophical and Mathematical Correspondence, trans. H. Kaal (University of Chicago Press).
McGuinness, B., (ed.) (1984). Gottlob Frege: Collected Papers in Mathematics, Logic and Philosophy (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).
Mellor, D. H. (ed.) (1990). F. P. Ramsey: Philosophical Papers (Cambridge University Press).
Mulder, H. L. and B. F. B. van de Velde-Schlick (eds.) (1979). Moritz Schlick: Philosophical Papers, vol. ii (Dordrecht: Kluwer).
Myhill, J. (1958). “Problems arising in the formalization of intensional logic,” Logique et Analyse 1: 78–83.
Myhill, J. (1974). “The undefinability of the set of natural numbers in the ramified Principia,” in G. Nakhnikian (ed.), Bertrand Russell’s Philosophy (London: Duckworth): 19–27.
Nagel, E. (1961). Structure of Science (New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, Inc.).
Newman, M. H. A. (1928). “Mr Russell’s causal theory of perception,” Mind 37: 137–48.
Newman, W. (2006). “Max Newman: mathematician, codebreaker and computer pioneer,” in B. J. Copeland (ed.), Colossus: The Secrets of Bletchley Park’s Codebreaking Computers (Oxford University Press): 176–88.
Nye, M. J. (1972). Molecular Reality: A Perspective on the Scientific Work of Jean Perrin (New York: American Elsevier Inc.).
Parsons, C. (1964). “Frege’s theory of number,” reprinted with a postscript in C. Parsons, Mathematics in Philosophy: Selected Essays (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1984): 150–75, and in Demopoulos (1995: 182–210).
Parsons, C. (1990). “Introductory note to 1944,” in Feferman et al. (1990: 102–18).
Parsons, C. (2002). “Realism and the debate on impredicativity: 1917–1944,” in W. Sieget al. (eds.), Reflections on the Foundations of Mathematics: Essays in Honor of Solomon Feferman (London: A. K. Peters/CRC Press): 378–95.
Perrin, J. (1916). Atoms, authorized trans. D. L. Hammock (New York: Van Nostrand).
Poincaré, H. (1900). “Hypotheses in physics,” in The Foundations of Science (Lancaster, PA: The Science Press, 1913): 127–39, authorized trans. by G. B. Halsted of “Les relations entre la physique expérimentale et la physique mathématique,” Revue Générale des Sciences Pures et Appliquées 11: 1163–75.
Poincaré, H. (1912a). “Les conceptions nouvelles de la matière,” Foi et Vie 15: 185–91. A translation of this essay by M. Frappier and J. Bub, together with an introduction by W. Demopoulos, M. Frappier, and J. Bub, appears in W. Demopoulos et al. (2012).
Poincaré, H. (1912b). “The relations between matter and ether,” in H. Poincaré, Mathematics and Science: Last Essays, trans. John W. Bolduc (New York: Dover, 1963): 89–101.
Potter, M. (2000). Reason’s Nearest Kin: Philosophies of Arithmetic from Kant to Carnap (Oxford University Press).
Potter, M. (2005). “Ramsey’s transcendental argument,” in Lillehammer and Mellor (2005: 71–82).
Psillos, S. (1999). Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth (London: Routledge).
Psillos, S. (2000). “Rudolf Carnap’s ‘Theoretical concepts in science,’” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 31: 151–72.
Putnam, H. (1965). “Craig’s theorem,” Journal of Philosophy 62: 251–60.
Putnam, H. (1977). “Realism and reason,” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 50: 483–98.
Putnam, H. (1978). Meaning and the Moral Sciences (Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul).
Putnam, H. (1981). Reason, Truth and History (Cambridge University Press).
Putnam, H. (2012). “A theorem of Craig’s about Ramsey sentences,” in M. DeCaro and D. Macarthur (eds.), Philosophy in an Age of Science (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press): 277–9.
Putnam, H. and P. Benacerraf (eds.) (1983). Philosophy of Mathematics: Selected Readings (Cambridge University Press, second edn).
Quine, W. V. O. (1951a). “Two dogmas of empiricism,” reprinted with abridgements and expansions in Quine (1980: 20–46).
Quine, W. V. O. (1951b). “On Carnap’s views on ontology,” Philosophical Studies 2: 65–72.
Quine, W. V. O. (1963). “Carnap and logical truth,” in Schilpp (1963: 385–406).
Quine, W. V. O. (1964). “Implicit definition sustained,” Journal of Philosophy 61: 71–4.
Quine, W. V. O. (1969). “Ontological relativity,” in Ontological Relativity and Other Essays (New York: Columbia University Press): 26–68.
Quine, W. V. O. (1980). From a Logical Point of View: Logico-Philosophical Essays (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, second edn).
Ramsey, F. P. (1925a). “Epilogue,” in Braithwaite (1931: 287–92).
Ramsey, F. P. (1925b).The Foundations of Mathematics, reprinted in Braithwaite (1931: 1–61) and in Mellor (1990: 164–224).
Ramsey, F. P. (1929). “Theories,” in Braithwaite (1931: 212–36) and in Mellor (1990: 112–36).
Reck, E. (2004). “From Frege and Russell to Carnap: logic and logicism in the 1920s,” in S. Awodey and G. Klein (eds.), Carnap Brought Home (La Salle, IL: Open Court): 151–80.
Reck, E. (2007). “Carnap and modern logic,” in Friedman and Creath (2007: 176–99).
Ricketts, T. (1997). “Truth values and courses of values in Frege’s Grundgesetze,” in W. W. Tait (ed.), Early Analytic Philosophy: Frege, Russell and Wittgenstein (Chicago: Open Court): 187–211.
Ricketts, T. (2007). “Tolerance and logicism: logical syntax and the philosophy of mathematics,” in Friedman and Creath (2007: 200–25).
Robinson, A. (1966). Non-Standard Analysis (Amsterdam: North-Holland).
Russ, S. B. (1980). “A translation of Bolzano’s paper on the intermediate value theorem,” Historia Mathematica 7: 152–85.
Russell, B. (1903). The Principles of Mathematics (New York: W.W. Norton, 1938 edn).
Russell, B. (1905). “On denoting,” reprinted in Russell (1956: 41–56) and Russell (1994: 414–27).
Russell, B. (1908). “Mathematical logic as based on the theory of types,” reprinted in Russell (1956: 59–102).
Russell, B. (1912). The Problems of Philosophy (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, a reprint of the 1912 Home University Library edn).
Russell, B. (1914a). Our Knowledge of the External World as a Field for Scientific Method in Philosophy (London: Allen and Unwin).
Russell, B. (1914b). “The relation of sense-data to physics,” reprinted in Russell (1929: 145–79).
Russell, B. (1919). Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy (London: Allen and Unwin).
Russell, B. (1924). Logical Atomism, reprinted in Russell (1956: 321–44).
Russell, B. (1927). The Analysis of Matter (New York: Dover, 1954 reprint).
Russell, B. (1929). Mysticism and Logic (New York: Norton).
Russell, B. (1948). Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits (London: Allen and Unwin).
Russell, B. (1956). Logic and Knowledge: Essays 1901–1950, ed. R. C. Marsh (London: Allen and Unwin).
Russell, B. (1959). My Philosophical Development (New York: Simon and Schuster).
Russell, B. (1968). The Autobiography of Bertrand Russell, vol. ii (London: Allen and Unwin).
Russell, B. (1994). The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, vol. iv: Foundations of Logic 1903–05, the McMaster University edn, ed. A. Urquhart and A. C. Lewis (London and New York: Routledge).
Sandu, G. (2005). “Ramsey on the notion of arbitrary function,” in Frapolli (2005: 237–56).
Savage, C. W. and C. A. Anderson (eds.) (1989). Rereading Russell: Critical Essays on Bertrand Russell’s Metaphysics and Epistemology, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. xii (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).
Schilpp, P. A. (ed.) (1963). The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap (La Salle, IL: Open Court).
Schirn, M. (ed.) (1998). Philosophy of Mathematics Today (Oxford University Press).
Schlick, M. (1918/1925). General Theory of Knowledge, trans. A. E. Blumberg (La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1985).
Schlick, M. (1926). “Experience, cognition and metaphysics,” trans. P. Heath, reprinted in Mulder and van de Velde-Schlick (1979: 99–111).
Schlick, M. (1932). Three Lectures on Form and Content, reprinted in Mulder and van de Velde-Schlick (1979: 285–369).
Simons, P. (1988). “Functional operations in Frege’s Begriffsschrift,” History and Philosophy of Logic 9: 35–42.
Stein, H. (1967). “Newtonian space-time,” Texas Quarterly 10: 174–200.
Stein, H. (1989). “Yes, but . . . Some skeptical remarks on realism and anti-realism,” Dialectica 43: 47–65.
Sullivan, P. and M. Potter (1997). “Hale on Caesar,” Philosophia Mathematica series iii, 5: 135–52.
Swijtink, Z. G. (1976). “Eliminability in a cardinal,” Studia Logica 35: 71–89.
Uebel, T. (2007). Empiricism at the Crossroads: The Vienna Circle’s Protocol-Sentence Debate (Chicago and La Salle, IL: Open Court).
van Benthem, J. (1978). “Ramsey eliminability,” Studia Logica 37: 321–36.
van FraassenB. C. (1980). The Scientific Image (Oxford University Press).
van FraassenB. C. (1989). Laws and Symmetry (Oxford University Press).
van FraassenB. C. (1997). “Putnam’s paradox: metaphysical realism revamped and evaded,” Philosophical Perspectives: Mind Causation and World 11: 17–42.
van FraassenB. C. (2008). Scientific Representation: Paradoxes of Perspective (Oxford University Press).
van FraassenB. C. (2009). “The perils of Perrin, in the hands of philosophers,” Philosophical Studies 143: 5–24.
van Heijenoort, J. (ed.) (1967). From Frege to Gödel: A Sourcebook in Mathematical Logic, 1879–1931 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
Wang, H. (1957). “The axiomatization of arithmetic,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 22: 145–57.
Wehmeier, K. F. (2008). “Wittgensteinian tableaux, identity, and co-denotation,” Erkenntnis 69: 363–76.
Wehmeier, K. F. (2009). “On Ramsey’s ‘silly delusion’ regarding Tractatus 5.53,” in G. Primiero and S. Rahman (eds.), Knowledge and Judgement: Essays in Honor of G. Sundholm (London: College Publications): 353–68.
Whitehead, A. N. and B. Russell (1910). Principia Mathematica, vol. i (Cambridge University Press).
Whitehead, A. N., and B. Russell (1912). Principia Mathematica, vol. ii (Cambridge University Press).
Wilson, M. (1992). “Frege: the royal road from geometry,” reprinted with a postscript in Demopoulos (1995: 108–59).
Wilson, M. (1993). “Honorable intensions,” in S. Wagner and R. Warner (eds.), Naturalism (South Bend, IN: Notre Dame University Press): 53–94.
Winnie, J. (1967). “The implicit definition of theoretical terms,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 18: 223–9.
Winnie, J. (1970). “Theoretical analyticity,” in R. Cohen and M. Wartofsky (eds.), Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. viii (Dordrecht: Reidel): 289–305.
Winnie, J. (1977). “The causal theory of space-time,” in J. Earmanet al. (eds.), Foundations of Space-Time Theories, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. viii (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press): 134–205.
Wittgenstein, L. (1922). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, trans. D. Pears and B. McGuinness (New York: Routledge Classics, 2001 edn).
Wright, C. (1983). Frege’s Conception of Numbers as Objects (Aberdeen University Press).
Wright, C. (1990). “Field and Fregean Platonism,” in A. Irvine (ed.), Physicalism in Mathematics (Dordrecht: Kluwer): 73–94.
Wright, C. (1997). “On the philosophical significance of Frege’s theorem,” in R. Heck (ed.), Language, Thought, and Logic: Essays in Honour of Michael Dummett (Oxford University Press): 201–44.
Wright, C. (1998a). “On the harmless impredicativity of N= (‘Hume’s principle’),” in Schirn (1998: 339–68).
Wright, C. (1998b). “Response to Dummett,” in Schirn (1998: 389–406).
Youschkevitch, A. P. (1976). “The concept of function up to the middle of the 19th century,” Archive for the History of Exact Science 16: 37–85.
