Book contents
- Language Regard
- Language Regard
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Notes on Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Language Regard: Varied Methods
- 2 A Variationist Approach to Studies of Language Regard
- 3 The Emic and the Etic in Perceptual Dialectology
- 4 Variation in Language Regard: Sociolinguistic Receptivity and Acceptability of Linguistic Features
- 5 Social Meanings of the North–South Divide in the Netherlands and Their Linkage to Standard Dutch and Various Dialects
- 6 Language Subordination on a National Scale: Examining the Linguistic Discrimination of Hungarians by Hungarians
- 7 Regional Identity and Listener Perception
- Part II Language Regard and Language Variation
- Part III Language Regard and Language Change
- Index
- References
6 - Language Subordination on a National Scale: Examining the Linguistic Discrimination of Hungarians by Hungarians
from Part I - Language Regard: Varied Methods
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 January 2018
Book contents
- Language Regard
- Language Regard
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Notes on Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Language Regard: Varied Methods
- 2 A Variationist Approach to Studies of Language Regard
- 3 The Emic and the Etic in Perceptual Dialectology
- 4 Variation in Language Regard: Sociolinguistic Receptivity and Acceptability of Linguistic Features
- 5 Social Meanings of the North–South Divide in the Netherlands and Their Linkage to Standard Dutch and Various Dialects
- 6 Language Subordination on a National Scale: Examining the Linguistic Discrimination of Hungarians by Hungarians
- 7 Regional Identity and Listener Perception
- Part II Language Regard and Language Variation
- Part III Language Regard and Language Change
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Language RegardMethods, Variation and Change, pp. 118 - 131Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Beregszászi, Anikó. 2012. A lehetetlent lehetni: Tantárgy-pedagógiai útmutató és feladatgyűjtemény az anyanyelv oktatásához a kárpátaljai magyar iskolák 5–9. osztályában. Budapest: Tinta Könyvkiadó.Google Scholar
Dornbach, F. Mária & Kontra, Miklós. 2013. Falusi történet. In Benő, Attila, Fazakas, Emese & Kádár, Edit (eds.), “... hogy legyen a víznek lefolyása...”: Köszöntő kötet Szilágyi N. Sándor tiszteletére, 99–119. Kolozsvár: Erdélyi Múzeum-Egyesület.Google Scholar
Fenyvesi, Anna (ed.). 2005. Hungarian Language Contact Outside Hungary. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gal, Susan. 1995. Linguistic theories and national images in 19th century Hungary. Pragmatics 5(2). 155–166.Google Scholar
Hudson, Richard. 2004. Why education needs linguistics (and vice versa). Journal of Linguistics 40. 105–130.Google Scholar
Hudson, Richard & Walmsley, John. 2005. The English patient: English grammar and teaching in the twentieth century. Journal of Linguistics 41. 593–622.Google Scholar
Kontra, Miklós. 2002. Where is the “most beautiful” and the “ugliest” Hungarian spoken? In Long, Daniel & Preston, Dennis R. (eds.), Handbook of Perceptual Dialectology, Vol. 2, 205–218. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. (ed.). 2003. Nyelv és társadalom a rendszerváltáskori Magyarországon. Budapest: Osiris Kiadó.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 2006. Sustainable linguicism. In Hinskens, Frans (ed.), Language Variation – European Perspectives, 97–126. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 2009. Mivel korrelálnak a nyelvi előítéletek Budapesten? In Borbély, Anna, Kremmer, Ildikó Vančoné, & Hattyár, Helga (eds.), Nyelvideológiák, attitűdök és sztereotípiák, 37–51. Budapest: Tinta Könyvkiadó.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 2016. Hungary: A sham fightback against the domination of English. In Bunce, Pauline, Phillipson, Robert, Rapatahana, Vaughan, & Tupas, Ruanni (eds.), Why English? Confronting the Hydra, 234–241. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Kontra, Miklós, Péntek, János, & Szilágyi, Sándor N.. 2011. A Kárpát-medencei szociolingvisztikai vizsgálat 1996. évi romániai kérdőíve és kereszttáblái (II.). Nyelv- és Irodalomtudományi Közlemények LV(1). 67–84.Google Scholar
Kontra, Miklós & Vargha, Fruzsina S.. 2014. Are there speakers of the /ɛ/ vs. /e/ dialect in Budapest? In Barysevich, Alena, D’Arcy, Alexandra & Heap, David (eds.), Proceedings of Methods XIV, 14–24. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Margócsy, István. 1996. Magyar nyelv és/vagy irodalom: Egy tantárgy kialakulása és változásai. Budapesti Könyvszemle 1996/1. 42–52.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 2006a. “Istennőm, végzetem, mindenem, magyar nyelv!”: A magyar nyelv kultikus megközelítései – 1. rész. Beszélő 2006/10. 95–109.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 2006b. “Istennőm, végzetem, mindenem, magyar nyelv!”: A magyar nyelv kultikus megközelítései – 2. rész. Beszélő 2006/11. 90–98.Google Scholar
Milroy, James. 1999. The consequences of standardisation in descriptive linguistics, in Bex, Tony & Watts, Richard J. (eds.), Standard English: The Widening Debate, 16–39. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ngũgĩ, wa Thiong’o. 1987. Decolonising the Mind: The Politics of Language in African Literature. London: James Currey.Google Scholar
Pléh, Csaba & Bodor, Péter. 2000. Linguistic superego in a normative language community and the stigmatization – hypercorrection dimension. Multilingua 19(1–2). 123–139.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 2011. The power of language regard – discrimination, classification, comprehension, and production. Dialectologia. Special issue II. 9–33.Google Scholar
Szabó, Tamás Péter. 2012. “Kirakunk táblákat, hogy csúnyán beszélni tilos”: A javítás mint gyakorlat és mint téma diákok és tanáraik metanyelvében. Dunaszerdahely: Gramma.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 2013. A corpus-based analysis of language ideologies in Hungarian school metalanguage. Research in Corpus Linguistics 1. 65–79.Google Scholar
Szilágyi, N. Sándor. 2001. A többség nyelvi jogai. In Andor, József, Szűcs, Tibor, & Terts, István (eds.), Színes eszmék nem alszanak...: Szépe György 70. születésnapjára, 1209–1218. Pécs: Lingua Franca Csoport.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. 2016. Making Waves: The Story of Variationist Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
The Fundamental Law of Hungary (April 25, 2011). http://www.kormany.hu/download/e/02/00000/The%20New%20Fundamental%20Law%20of%20Hungary.pdf (March 30, 2016).Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt, Reaser, Jeffrey, & Vaughn, Charlotte. 2008. Operationalizing linguistic gratuity: From principle to practice. Language and Linguistics Compass 2(16). 1109–1134.Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by