Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ph5wq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-19T07:19:14.272Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Flexible Physical Layer Design

from Part II - Physical Layer Communication Techniques

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2017

Maximilian Matthé
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
Martin Danneberg
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
Dan Zhang
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
Gerhard Fettweis
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
Vincent W. S. Wong
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Vancouver
Robert Schober
Affiliation:
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany
Derrick Wing Kwan Ng
Affiliation:
University of New South Wales, Sydney
Li-Chun Wang
Affiliation:
National Chiao Tung University, Taiwan
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The role of software in mobile communication systems has increased over time. For the upcoming fifth generation (5G) mobile networks, the concept of software-defined networking (SDN) can ease network management by enabling anything as a service. Software-defined radio (SDR) enables radio virtualization, where several radio components are implemented in software. Cognitive radio (CR) goes one step further by using a software-based decision cycle to self-adapt the SDR parameters and consequently optimize the use of communication resources. This proposal leads to the possibility of having real-time communication functionalities at virtual machines in cloud computing data centers, instead of deploying specialized hardware. Network functions virtualization (NFV) claims to provide cloud-based virtualization of network functionalities. The perspective is that all these software-based concepts should converge while 5G networks are being designed. A new breakthrough will be achieved when all these software paradigms are applied to the physical layer (PHY), where its functionalities are defined and controlled by software as well.

A flexible PHY design is particularly beneficial considering the diverse applications proposed for 5G [1]. In fact, these applications typically have conflicting design objectives and face extreme requirements. Broadband communication will play an important role in, for instance, offering video streaming services with high resolution for TV and supporting high-density multimedia such as 4K and 3D videos in smartphones. Data rates up to 10 gigabits per second (Gbps) are therefore being targeted in 5G. The Tactile Internet [2] enables one to control virtual or real objects via wireless links with haptic feedback. This implies that the end-to-end latency constraint in 5G must be dropped by at least one order of magnitude compared with current fourth generation (4G) technologies. The Internet of Things (IoT) is aimed at connecting a massive amount of devices. Wireless sensor networks need to provide in-service monitoring at low cost and with a long battery life. Smart vehicles improve safety and actively avoid accidents by exchanging their driving status, such as position, breaking, acceleration, and speed, with surrounding vehicles and infrastructure via challenging doubly dispersive channels. Overall, this demands asynchronous multiple access, ultra-low latency, and ultra-high reliability.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] G., Wunder, P., Jung, M., Kasparick, T., Wild, F., Schaich, Y., Chen, S., Brink, I., Gaspar, N., Michailow, A., Festag, L., Mendes, N., Cassiau, D., Ktenas, M., Dryjanski, S., Pietrzyk, B., Eged, P., Vago, and F., Wiedmann, “5GNOW: Non-orthogonal, asynchronous waveforms for future mobile applications,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 97–105, Feb. 2014.Google Scholar
[2] G., Fettweis, “The Tactile Internet: Applications and challenges,” IEEE Veh. Technol. Mag., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 64–70, Mar. 2014.Google Scholar
[3] N., Tadayon and S., Aissa, “Modeling and analysis of cognitive radio based IEEE 802.22 wireless regional area networks,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 4363–4375, Sep. 2013.Google Scholar
[4] B., Hirosaki, “An orthogonally multiplexed QAM system using the discrete Fourier transform,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 982–989, Jul. 1981.Google Scholar
[5] G., Cariolaro and F. C., Vagliani, “An OFDM scheme with a half complexity,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 1586–1599, Dec. 1995.Google Scholar
[6] E., Dahlman, S., Parkvall, and J., Skold, 4G: LTE/LTE-Advanced for Mobile Broadband, Elsevier Academic, 2011.
[7] X., Zhang, M., Jia, L., Chen, J., Ma, and J., Qiu, “Filtered-OFDM-enabler for flexible waveform in the 5th generation cellular networks,” in Proc. of IEEE Global Communnications Conf. (GLOBECOM), Dec. 2015.
[8] T., Wild, F., Schaich, and Y., Chen, “5G air interface design based on universal filtered (UF-)OFDM,” in Proc. of IEEE International Conf. on Digital Signal Processing (DSP), Aug. 2014.
[9] M., Bellanger et al., “FBMC physical layer: A primer,” PHYDYAS project, Jan. 2010. Available at www.ict-phydyas.org/teamspace/internal-folder/FBMC-Primer_ 06-2010.pdf.
[10] N., Michailow, M., Matthé, I., Gaspar, A., Caldevilla, L., Mendes, A., Festag, and G., Fettweis, “Generalized frequency division multiplexing for 5th generation cellular networks,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 62, no. 9, pp. 3045–3061, Sep. 2014.Google Scholar
[11] I., Gaspar, L., Mendes, M., Matthé, N., Michailow, A., Festag, and G., Fettweis, “LTE-compatible 5G PHY based on generalized frequency division multiplexing,” in Proc. of IEEE International Symposium on Wireless Communications Systems (ISWCS), Aug. 2014.
[12] D., Panaitopol, R., Datta, and G., Fettweis, “Cyclostationary detection of cognitive radio systems using GFDM modulation,” in Proc. of IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conf. (WCNC), Apr. 2012.
[13] R., Datta, D., Panaitopol, and G., Fettweis, “Cyclostationary detection of 5G GFDM waveform in cognitive radio transmission,” in Proc. of IEEE International Conf. on Ultra-Wide Band (ICUWB), Sep. 2014.
[14] T., Kadur, I., Gaspar, N., Michailow, and G., Fettweis, “Non-data aided frequency synchronization exploiting ICI in non-orthogonal systems,” in Proc. of IEEE Vehicular Technology Conf. (VTC-Fall), Sep. 2014.
[15] I., Gaspar, M., Matthé, N., Michailow, L. L., Mendes, D., Zhang, and G., Fettweis, “Frequency-shift offset-QAM for GFDM,” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 1454–1457, Aug. 2015.Google Scholar
[16] M., Matthé and G., Fettweis, “Conjugate root offset-QAM for orthogonal multicarrier transmission,” EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process., vol. 2016, no. 1, pp. 1–8, Apr. 2016.Google Scholar
[17] J. B., Anderson, F., Rusek, and V., Wall, “Faster-than-Nyquist signaling,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 101, no. 8, pp. 1817–1830, Aug. 2013.Google Scholar
[18] I., Kanaras, A., Chorti, M. R. D., Rodrigues, and I., Darwazeh, “Spectrally efficient FDM signals: Bandwidth gain at the expense of receiver complexity,” in Proc. of IEEE International Conf. on Communications (ICC), Jun. 2009.
[19] I., Gaspar, N., Michailow, A., Navarro, E., Ohlmer, S., Krone, and G., Fettweis, “Low complexity GFDM receiver based on sparse frequency domain processing,” in Proc. of IEEE Vehicular Technology Conf. (VTC-Spring), Jun. 2013.
[20] M., Danneberg, N., Michailow, I., Gaspar, D., Zhang, and G., Fettweis, “Flexible GFDM implementation in FPGA with support to run-time reconfiguration,” in Proc. of IEEE Vehicular Technology Conf. (VTC-Fall), Sep. 2015.
[21] H., Meyr, M., Moeneclaey, and S., Fechtel, Digital Communication Receivers: Synchronization, Channel Estimation, and Signal Processing, John Wiley, 1997.
[22] T. D., Chiueh and P. Y., Tsai, OFDM Baseband Receiver Design for Wireless Communications, Wiley, 2008.
[23] J. J., van de Beek, M., Sandell, and P. O., Borjesson, “ML estimation of time and frequency offset in OFDM systems,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 1800–1805, Jul. 1997.Google Scholar
[24] T. M., Schmidl and D. C., Cox, “Robust frequency and timing synchronization for OFDM,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 45, no. 12, pp. 1613–1621, Dec. 1997.Google Scholar
[25] H., Minn, V. K., Bhargava, and K. B., Letaief, “A robust timing and frequency synchronization for OFDM systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 822–839, Jul. 2003.Google Scholar
[26] A. B., Awoseyila, C., Kasparis, and B. G., Evans, “Improved preamble-aided timing estimation for OFDM systems,” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 825–827, Nov. 2008.Google Scholar
[27] I. S., Gaspar, L. L., Mendes, N., Michailow, and G., Fettweis, “A synchronization technique for generalized frequency division multiplexing,” EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process., vol. 2014, no. 1, pp. 1–10, Dec. 2014.Google Scholar
[28] I., Gaspar and G., Fettweis, “An embedded midamble synchronization approach for generalized frequency division multiplexing,” in Proc. of IEEE Global Communications Conf. (GLOBECOM), Dec. 2015.
[29] M. C., Necker and G. L., Stuber, “Totally blind channel estimation for OFDM on fast varying mobile radio channels,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 1514–1525, Sep. 2004.Google Scholar
[30] M., Danneberg, N., Michailow, I., Gaspar, M., Matthé, D., Zhang, L. L., Mendes, and G., Fettweis, “Implementation of a 2 by 2 MIMO-GFDM transceiver for robust 5G networks,” in Proc. of IEEE International Symposium on Wireless Communications Systems (ISWCS), Aug. 2015.
[31] A., Aghamohammadi, H., Meyr, and G., Ascheid, “Adaptive synchronization and channel parameter estimation using an extended Kalman filter,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 37, no. 11, pp. 1212–1219, Nov. 1989.Google Scholar
[32] D., Kong, D., Qu, and T., Jiang, “Time domain channel estimation for OQAM-OFDM systems: Algorithms and performance bounds,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 322–330, Jan. 2014.Google Scholar
[33] U., Vilaipornsawai and M., Jia, “Scattered-pilot channel estimation for GFDM,” in Proc. of IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conf. (WCNC), Apr. 2014.
[34] S., Ehsanfar, M., Matthé, D., Zhang, and G., Fettweis, “A study of pilot-aided channel estimation in MIMO-GFDM systems,” in Proc. of IEEE Workshop on Smart Antennas (WSA), Mar. 2016.
[35] S., Yang and L., Hanzo, “Fifty years of MIMO detection: The road to large-scale MIMOs,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 1941–1988, Fourth Quarter 2015.Google Scholar
[36] L., Lu, G. Y., Li, A. L., Swindlehurst, A., Ashikhmin, and R., Zhang, “An overview of massive MIMO: Benefits and challenges,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Signal Process., vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 742–758, Oct. 2014.Google Scholar
[37] M., Matthé, L. L., Mendes, N., Michailow, D., Zhang, and G., Fettweis, “Widely linear estimation for space-time-coded GFDM in low-latency applications,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 63, no. 11, pp. 4501–4509, Nov. 2015.Google Scholar
[38] M., Matthé, I., Gaspar, D., Zhang, and G., Fettweis, “Short paper: Near-ML detection for MIMO-GFDM,” in Proc. of IEEE Vehicular Technology Conf. (VTC-Fall), Sep. 2015.
[39] D., Zhang, M., Matthé, L. L., Mendes, and G., Fettweis, “A Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm for near-optimum detection of MIMO-GFDM signals,” in Proc. of IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), Aug. 2015.
[40] D., Zhang, L. L., Mendes, M., Matthé, I. S., Gaspar, N., Michailow, and G. P., Fettweis, “Expectation propagation for near-optimum detection of MIMO-GFDM signals,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 1045–1062, Feb. 2016.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×