Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T16:40:39.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

19 - Joining Society in Europe: Convergence or Sustainability of National Specificities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2010

Annie Fouquet
Affiliation:
Direction de l'Animation, de la Recherche, des Études et des Statistiques (DARES), Paris, France
Anne-Nelly Perret-Clermont
Affiliation:
Université de Neuchâtel, Switzerland
Clotilde Pontecorvo
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi di Roma 'La Sapienza', Italy
Lauren B. Resnick
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Tania Zittoun
Affiliation:
Université de Neuchâtel, Switzerland
Barbara Burge
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Get access

Summary

Each country in Europe has its own understanding of what youth is. To be young is not the same in the United Kingdom or in Italy, as their transition policies indicate. In the United Kingdom, policies address youngsters between 16 and 18 years old; meanwhile, in Italy and Spain, they concern young people from 18 to 30 and even 32 years of age. In European research meetings devoted to integration policies, British colleagues are often surprised to hear a Spanish colleague speaking about the transition for 30-year-old youngsters. They consider it improper. Mutual knowledge of these societal pecularities is still in the early stages, and European policies proposed by the European Union have not taken all of them into account.

Several factors explain this different understanding of what youth is. They have their roots in family traditions, school and training systems, modes of access to employment and of management of professionnal mobility, or labor market segmentation. Thus, the following contrasting situations have to be considered: Northern countries with nuclear families versus Southern countries with extended families; countries with general and undifferentiated compulsory schooling versus countries with differentiated tracks; countries with a tradition of apprenticeship managed by enterprises versus countries where vocational training is managed mainly by the school system; countries with a professional labor market versus internal markets or an informal labor market in local networks.

These elements are linked in national combinations that have their own balance, according to a long tradition.

Type
Chapter
Information
Joining Society
Social Interaction and Learning in Adolescence and Youth
, pp. 267 - 285
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beret, P. (1997, June). Formation et marché du travail en France et en Allemagne [Education, training and labor market in France and in Germany]. Communication of the Séminaire du Lasmas-IdL. Paris: IRESCO
Blossfeld, H. P. (1993). Changes in educational opportunities in the Federal Republic of Germany: A longitudinal study of cohorts born between 1916 and 1965. In Y. Shavit & H. P. Blossfeld (Eds.), Persistent inequality: Changing educational attainment in thirteen countries (pp. 51–74). New York: Westview Press
Blossfeld, H. P.CEDEFOP. (1994). The determinants of transitions in youth: Papers from the 1993 conference organized by the ESF Network on transitions in Youth. CEDEFOP (European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training) and GRET (Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona). Berlin: Panorama
Comte, A., & Helsper, W. (1991). Hermeneustische Jugendforschung. Theoretische Konzepte und methodologische Ansätze [Research on young people. Theoretical concepts and methodological issues]. Opladen, Germany: Verlag
Duru-Bellat, M., Kieffer, A., & Mearelli-Fournier, I. (1997). Le diplôme, l'âge et le niveau: Sens et usages dans les comparaisons des systèmes éducatifs [Diploma, age and attainment level: Meaning and use when comparing education systems]. Sociétés Contemporaines, 26, 42–72. Paris: IRESCOCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eurostat. (1995). Bildung in der europäischen union. Daten und kennzahlen/Education across the European Union: Statistics and indicators/Education dans l'union européenne: Statistiques et indicateurs. Luxembourg: Author
Eurostat. (1997). Enquête Forces de travail. Résultats 1995 [Labor Force Survey, 1995 outcomes]. Luxembourg: Author
Eyraud, F., Marsden, D., & Sylvestre, J. J. (1990). Marché professionnel et marché interne en Grande-Bretagne et en France [Professional labor market and internal labor market in Great Britain and in France]. Revue Internationale du Travail, 129, 551–571Google Scholar
Hamilton, S., & Hurrelman, K. (1993). Auf der Suche nach dem besten Modell für den Ubergang von der Schule in den Beruf: ein amerikanisch–deutscher Vergleich [Toward the best model for the pathway from school to work: A German–American comparison]. Zeitschrift für Socialisationforschung und Erziehungsoziologie, 13, 326–340Google Scholar
Hantrais, L., & Letablier, M. T. (1996a). Families and family policies in Europe. London: Longman
Hantrais, L., & Letablier, M. T. (1996b). Familles, travail et politiques familiales en Europe [Families, work and family policies in Europe] (Cahier 36). Noisy-le-Grand, France: Centre d'Etudes de l'Emploi
Heinz, W. R. (1994). Transition behaviour and career outcomes in England and Germany. In CEDEFOP, The determinants of transitions in youth: Papers from the 1993 conference organized by the ESF Network on transitions in Youth (pp. 159–167). CEDEFOP (European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training) and GRET (Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona). Berlin: Panorama
Heinz, W. R., & Nagel, H. (1995). Changements et modernisation des transitions école-travail [Changes and modernization in transitions from school to work]. In A. Jobert, C. Marry, & L. Tanguy (Eds.), Education et Travail en Grande-Bretagne, Allemagne et Italie [Education and work in Great Britain, Germany and Italy] (pp. 84–100). Paris: Armand Colin (Bibliothèque Européenne des Sciences de l'Education)
Hitmayer, W., & Olk, T. (Eds.). (1990). Individualisierung von Jugend [Individualization of young people]. Weinsheim/Munich: Juventa
Jobert, A., Marry, C., & Tanguy, L. (Eds.) (1995). Education et Travail en Grande-Bretagne, Allemagne et Italie [Education and work in Great Britain, Germany and Italy]. Paris: Armand Colin (Bibliothèque Européenne des Sciences de l'Education)
Kieffer, A., & Marry, C. (1994). French women entering the labour process and setting up household in the 1980s. In CEDEFOP, The determinants of transitions in youth: Papers from the 1993 conference organized by the ESF Network on transitions in youth (pp. 168–179). CEDEFOP (European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training) and GRET (Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona). Berlin: Panorama
Lefresne, F. (1995). Comparaison européenne des dispositifs d'insertion professionnelle des jeunes [European comparison of professional integration schemes for youth people]. Revue de l'IRES, 17, 97–133. Noisy-le-Grand, France: IRESGoogle Scholar
Marsden, D. W. (1989). Marché du travail, limites sociales des nouvelles théories [Labor market, social limits of new theories]. Paris: Economica
Marsden, D. W., & Ryan, P. (1991). The structuring of youth pay and employment in six European countries. In P. Ryan, P. Garonna, & R. C. Edwards (Eds.), The problem of youth (pp. 82–112). London: Macmillan
Maurice, M., Sellier, F., & Sylvestre, J. J. (1982). Politique d'éducation et organization industrielle en France et en Allemagne [Education policies and industrial organization in France and Germany]. Paris: PUF
Mayer, K. U. (1994). Perspectives on systems, institutions and changes. In CEDEFOP, The determinants of transitions in youth: Papers from the 1993 conference organized by the ESF Network on transitions in Youth (pp. 1–11). CEDEFOP (European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training) and GRET (Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona). Berlin: Panorama
Mayer, K. U., & Konietzka, D. (1998). Le modèle dual est-il en crise? [Occupational training and early careers: Models of Germany in crisis?]. Revue Française de Sociologie, 39(2), 269–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merle, V. (1994). Commentaires autour de l'article d'Hilary Steedman et Julia Hawkins [About Hilary Steedman and Julia Hawkins's paper]. Formation et Emploi, 46, 23–25. Paris: La Documentation FrançaiseCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Méron, M. (1997). Les trajectoires des jeunes: distances et dépendances entre générations [Youth trajectories: Length and dependancy between generations]. In M. Méron (Ed.) [special issue], Economie et Statistique, 304–305 (pp. 20–23). Paris: INSEE
Muller, W. (1994). The process and consequences of education differenciation. In CEDEFOP, The determinants of transitions in youth: Papers from the 1993 conference organized by the ESF Network on transitions in Youth (pp. 207–213). CEDEFOP (European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training) and GRET (Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona). Berlin: Panorama
Rindfuss, R. C., Swicegood, C. G., & Rosenfeld, R. A. (1987). Disorder in the life course: How common and does it matter?American Sociological Review, 52, 785–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steedman, H., & Hawkins, J. (1994). Réforme de la formation professionnelle des jeunes britanniques. Une première évaluation [Youth training reform in Great Britain: A first evaluation]. Formation et Emploi, 46, 9–21. Paris: La Documentation FrançaiseCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanguy, L. (1995). Construction de la catégorie de formation dans un contexte de chômage en Grande-Bretagne [Building a training concept in the British unemployment context]. Sociologie du Travail, 4, 715–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villeneuve-Gokalp, C. (1997). Le départ de chez ses parents: définitions d'un processus complexe [Departing from home: Definitions of a complex process]. In M. Méron (Ed.) [special issue], Economie et Statistique, 304–305 (pp. 149–162). Paris: INSEE
Werquin, P., Breen, R., & Planas, J. (Eds.). (1997). Youth transitions in Europe: Theories and evidence. Third ESF Workshop of the Network on Transitions in Youth (Document 120). Marseille: CEREQ

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×