Gardiner, R, Treaty Interpretation (Oxford University Press 2008) 202–04Google Scholar

Institut de Droit International, ‘Resolution on the Interpretation of Treaties’ (Granada Session 1956) 46-II Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit International364, article 1: ‘the terms of the provisions of the treaty should be interpreted…in the light of the principles of international law’)Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M, ‘Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law: Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission’ (4 April 2006), UN Doc. A/CN.4/L.682, 183–96

Jennings, R and Watts, A, Oppenheim’s International Law, 9th edn (Longman, Harlow 1992) 1275Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, H, The Development of International Law by the International Court (Praeger 1958) 26–31Google Scholar

Akehurst, M, ‘The Hierarchy of the Sources of International Law’ (1974–1975) 47 British Ybk Int’l L273, 275–76Google Scholar

Sullivan, R, Sullivan and Driedger on the Construction of Statutes, 4th edn (Butterworths 2002) 354Google Scholar

Villiger, M, Customary International Law and Treaties (Martinus Nijhoff 1985) 268–69Google Scholar

Schabas, W, ‘Customary Law or “Judge-Made” Law: Judicial Creativity at the UN Criminal Tribunals’ in Doria, J, Gasser, H-P and Bassiouni, M (eds.), The Legal Regime of the International Criminal Court: Essays in Honour of Professor Igor Blishchenko (Brill 2009) 77–78Google Scholar

Schachter, O, International Law in Theory and Practice (Martinus Nijhoff 1991) 71–72Google Scholar

Jacobs, D, ‘Positivism and International Criminal Law: The Principle of Legality as a Rule of Conflict of Theories’ in d’Aspremont, J and Kammerhofer, J (eds.), International Legal Positivism in a Post-Modern World (Cambridge University Press, forthcoming October 2014)Google Scholar

Thirlway, HWA, International Customary Law and Codification (Sijthoff 1972) 28Google Scholar

Rescher, N, Presumption and the Practices of Tentative Cognition (Cambridge University Press 2006) 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schachter, O, ‘Entangled Treaty and Custom’ in Dinstein, Y (ed.), International Law at a Time of Perplexity: Essays in Honour of Shabtai Rosenne (Martinus Nijhoff 1989) 717Google Scholar

Gallant, K, The Principle of Legality in International and Comparative Criminal Law (Cambridge University Press 2009) 3Google Scholar

Cassese, A, International Criminal Law, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press 2008) 17Google Scholar

Werle, G, Principles of International Criminal Law (TMC Asser 2005) 108–09Google Scholar

Seibert-Fohr, A, ‘Modern Concepts of Customary International Law as a Manifestation of a Value-Based International Order’ in Zimmermann, A and Hofmann, R (eds.), Unity and Diversity in International Law (Duncker & Humblot 2006) 257Google Scholar

Orakhelashvili, A, The Interpretation of Acts and Rules of Public International Law (Oxford University Press 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schabas, W, The International Criminal Court: A Commentary on the Rome Statute (Oxford University Press 2010) 271CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pauwelyn, J, Conflict of Norms in Public International Law: How WTO Law Relates to Other Rules of International Law (Cambridge University Press 2003) 257–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Institut de Droit International, ‘Problems Arising from a Succession of Codification Conventions on a Particular Subject’ (Lisbon Session 1995) 66-I Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit International39, conclusion 14Google Scholar

Bitti, G, ‘Article 21 of the Statute of the ICC and the Treatment of Sources of Law in the Jurisprudence of the ICC’ in Stahn, C and Sluiter, G (eds.), The Emerging Practice of the International Criminal Court (Martinus Nijhoff 2009) 281Google Scholar

Kittichaisaree, K, International Criminal Law (Oxford University Press 2001) 50Google Scholar

von Hebel, H and Robinson, D, ‘Crimes within the Jurisdiction of the Court’ in Lee, R (ed.), The International Criminal Court: The Making of the Rome Statute (Transnational 1999) 79Google Scholar

McCormack, TH and Robertson, D, ‘Jurisdictional Aspects of the Rome Statute for the New International Criminal Court’ (1999) 23 Melbourne Univ LR25Google Scholar

Danilenko, GM, ‘The ICC Statute and Third States’ in Cassese, A and Others (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, vol. II (Oxford University Press 2002) 1871Google Scholar

Boot, M, Dixon, R and Hall, CK (revised by Hall, CK), ‘Article 7’ in Triffterer, O (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 2nd edn (CH Beck/Hart/Nomos 2008) 159Google Scholar

Robinson, D, ‘The Elements for Crimes Against Humanity’ in Lee, RS and Others (eds.), The International Criminal Court: Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence (Transnational 2001) 57Google Scholar

Cassese, A, ‘The Statute of the International Criminal Court: Some Preliminary Reflections’ (1999) 10 EJIL144, 152CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaeta, P, ‘The Defence of Superior Orders: The Statute of the International Criminal Court versus Customary International Law’ (1999) 10 EJIL172, 190CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kreß, C, ‘War Crimes Committed in Non-International Armed Conflict and the Emerging System of International Criminal Justice’ (2000) 30 Israel Ybk Human Rights103Google Scholar

Kreß, C, ‘The Crime of Genocide and Contextual Elements’ (2009) 7 J Int’l Crim Justice297CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirsch, P, ‘Foreword’ in Dörmann, K, Elements of War Crimes under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (Cambridge University Press 2003) xiii, xiii–xivCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Triffterer, O, ‘Can the “Elements of Crimes” Narrow or Broaden Responsibility for Criminal Behaviour Defined in the Rome Statute?’ in Stahn, C and Sluiter, G (eds.), The Emerging Practice of the International Criminal Court (Brill 2009) 381Google Scholar

von Hebel, H, ‘The Making of the Elements of Crimes’ in Lee, R and Others (eds.), The International Criminal Court: Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence (Transnational 2001) 3Google Scholar

Kreß, C, Barriga, S, Grover, L and von Holtzendorff, L, ‘Negotiating the Understandings on the Crime of Aggression’ in Barriga, S and Kreß, Claus (eds.), Travaux Préparatoires of the Crime of Aggression (Cambridge University Press 2011) 81CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heller, KJ, ‘The Uncertain Legal Status of the Aggression Understandings’ (2012) 10 J Int’l Crim Justice229CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nolte, G, Special Rapporteur to the International Law Commission in Nolte, G (ed.), Treaties and Subsequent Practice (Oxford University Press 2013) 169, 210, 307Google Scholar

Dörr, O, ‘General Rule of Interpretation’ in Dörr, O and Schmalenbach, K (eds.), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (Springer 2012) 521, 553CrossRefGoogle Scholar

ILC, ‘Reports of the International Law Commission on the Second Part of its Seventeenth Session and on its Eighteenth Session’ (1966) II Ybk of the ILC169, 219–20Google Scholar

Villiger, ME, Commentary on the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2009) 435–36Google Scholar

Waldock, H, ‘Sixth Report on the Law of Treaties’ (1966) II Ybk of the ILC51, 95, para. 6Google Scholar

Waldock, H, ‘Sixth Report on the Law of Treaties’ (1966) II Ybk of the ILC51, 98, para. 16Google Scholar

Clark, R, ‘Treaty and Custom’ in de Chazournes, L Boisson and Sands, P (eds.), International Law, the International Court of Justice and Nuclear Weapons (Cambridge University Press 1999) 171Google Scholar

Pellet, A, ‘Applicable Law’ in Cassese, A and Others (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, vol. II (Oxford University Press 2002) 1051Google Scholar

Rousseau, C, Principes généraux de droit international public, vol. I (Pédone 1944) 498Google Scholar

Higgins, R, ‘Some Observations on the Inter-Temporal Rule in International Law’ in Makarczyk, J (ed.), Theory of International Law at the Threshold of the 21st Century: Essays in Honour of Krzysztof Skubiszewski (Kluwer Law International 1996) 173Google Scholar

Waldock, H, ‘Third Report on the Law of Treaties’ (1964) II Ybk of the ILC5, 8ffGoogle Scholar

Waldock, H, ‘872nd Meeting: The Law of Treaties’ (1966) I (Part Two) Ybk of the ILC198, 199Google Scholar

D’Amato, A, ‘International Law, Intertemporal Problems’ (1992) Encyclopedia of Public Int’l L 1234

Institut de Droit International, ‘The Intertemporal Problem in Public International Law’ (Wiesbaden Session 1975) 56:I Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit International536, para. 4Google Scholar

ILC ‘Conclusions of the Work of the Study Group on the Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law’ (2006) II (Part Two) Ybk of the ILC, para. 22Google Scholar

Kontou, N, The Termination and Revision of Treaties in the Light of New Customary International Law (Oxford University Press 1994) 18–19Google Scholar

Elias, TO, The International Court of Justice and Some Contemporary Problems (Brill 1983) 127–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schabas, WA, An Introduction to the International Criminal Court, 2nd edn (Cambridge University Press 2004) 93CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bassiouni, MC, The Legitimacy of the International Criminal Court, vol. I (Transnational 2005) 163–64Google Scholar

Raz, J, The Authority of Law (Oxford University Press 1979) 214–15Google Scholar

Lamb, S, ‘Nullum Crimen, Nulla Poena Sine Lege in International Criminal Law’ in Cassese, A and Others (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, vol. I (Oxford University Press 2002) 733Google Scholar

Oosterveld, V, ‘The Elements of Genocide’ in Lee, RS and Others (eds.), The International Criminal Court: Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence (Transnational 2001) 41Google Scholar

Ashworth, A and Horder, J, Principles of Criminal Law, 7th edn (Oxford University Press 2013) 80CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bjorge, E, The Evolutionary Interpretation of Treaties (Oxford University Press 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arato, J, ‘Subsequent Practice and Evolutive Interpretation: Techniques of Treaty Interpretation over Time and their Diverse Consequences’ (2010) 9:3 The Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals443CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nolte, G, ‘Jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice and Arbitral Tribunals of Ad Hoc Jurisdiction Relating to Subsequent Agreements and Subsequent Practice: Introductory Report for the ILC Study Group on Treaties over Time’ in Nolte, G (ed.), Treaties and Subsequent Practice (Oxford University Press 2013) 169Google Scholar

Sinclair, I, The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 2nd edn (Manchester University Press 1984) 137–38Google Scholar

Nolte, G, ‘Second Report for the ILC Study Group on Treaties over Time: Jurisprudence under Special Regimes relating to Subsequent Agreements and Subsequent Practice’ in Nolte, G (ed.), Treaties and Subsequent Practice (Oxford University Press 2013) 210Google Scholar

ILC, ‘Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of its Eighteenth Session’ (1966) II Ybk of the ILC163, 172, 182, 163–69, 220–22 and 266–67Google Scholar

Byers, M, Custom, Power and the Power of Rules (Cambridge University Press 1999) 172–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McNair, AD, The Law of Treaties, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press 1961) 412Google Scholar

Akande, D, ‘The Sources of International Criminal Law’ in Cassese, A (ed.), The Oxford Companion to International Criminal Justice (Oxford University Press 2009) 41Google Scholar

Jacobs, D, ‘Positivism and International Criminal Law: The Principle of Legality as a Rule of Conflict of Theories’ in d’Aspremont, J and Kammerhofer, J (eds.), International Legal Positivism in a Post-Modern World (Cambridge University Press, forthcoming October 2014), 1Google Scholar

Barriga, S, Danspeckgruber, W and Wenaweser, C (eds.), The Princeton Process on the Crime of Aggression: Materials of the Special Working Group on the Crime of Aggression, 2003 –2009 (Liechtenstein Institute on Self-Determination 2009)