Ad Hoc Committee, ‘Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court’ 1995 UN Doc. A/50/22.

Ajevski, P, ‘Interpretation and the Constraints on International Courts’, , accessed 20 October 2013.

Akande, D, ‘The Sources of International Criminal Law’ in Cassese, A (ed.), The Oxford Companion to International Criminal Justice (Oxford University Press 2009) 41.Google Scholar

Akande, D, ‘The Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court over Nationals of Non-Parties: Legal Basis and Limits’ (2003) 1 J Int’l Crim Justice618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Akehurst, M, ‘The Hierarchy of the Sources of International Law’ (1974–1975) 47 British Ybk Int’l L273.Google Scholar

Akhavan, P, ‘Reconciling Crimes against Humanity with the Laws of War: Human Rights, Armed Conflict, and the Limits of Progressive Jurisprudence’ (2008) 6:1 J Int’l Crim Justice21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alldridge, P, ‘Rules for Courts and Rules for Citizens’ (1990) 10:4 Oxford J Legal Stud487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allott, P, ‘The Concept of International Law’ (1999) 10 EJIL31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ambos, K, ‘Defences in International Criminal Law’ in Brown, BS (ed.), Research Handbook on International Criminal Law (Elgar 2011) 299.Google Scholar

Ambos, K, ‘Nulla Poena Sine Lege in International Criminal Law’ in Haveman, R and Olusanya, O (eds.), Sentencing and Sanctioning in Supranational Criminal Law (Intersentia 2006) 17.Google Scholar

Ambos, K, ‘Some Preliminary Reflections on the Mens Rea Requirements of the Crimes in the ICC Statute and the Elements of Crimes’ in Vohrah, LC and Others (eds.), Man’s Inhumanity to Man: Essays on International Law in Honour of Antonio Cassese (Kluwer Law International 2003) 11.Google Scholar

Amnesty International, International Criminal Court: Rome Statute Implementation Report Card, Part One (1 May 2010) Index No. IOR 53/011/2010.

Amnesty International, International Criminal Court: The Failure of States to Enact Effective Implementing Legislation (30 August 2004) Index No. IOR 40/019/2004.

Arato, J, ‘Accounting for Difference in Treaty Interpretation over Time’, Draft Paper prepared for the Cambridge Conference on Interpretation in International Law, Lauterpacht Centre for International Law (27 August 2013) (on file with author).

Arato, J, ‘Subsequent Practice and Evolutive Interpretation: Techniques of Treaty Interpretation over Time and their Diverse Consequences’ (2010) 9:3 The Law & Practice of Int’l Courts and Trib443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnold, R and Others, ‘Article 8’ in Triffterer, O (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 2nd edn (CH Beck/Hart/Nomos 2008) 275.Google Scholar

Arsanjani, MH, ‘The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court’ (1999) 93 AJIL22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ashworth, A, Principles of Criminal Law, 4th edn (Oxford University Press 2003).Google Scholar

Ashworth, A, ‘Interpreting Criminal Statutes: a Crisis of Legality?’ (1991) 107 LQR419.Google Scholar

Ashworth, A, Emmerson, B, and Macdonald, A, Human Rights and Criminal Justice, 2nd edn (Sweet & Maxwell 2007).Google Scholar

Ashworth, A, and Horder, J, Principles of Criminal Law, 7th edn (Oxford University Press 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Atiyah, PS, ‘Common Law and Statute Law’ (1985) 48 Modern L Rev1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aust, A, Modern Treaty Law and Practice (Cambridge University Press 2000).Google Scholar

Badar, ME, ‘The Mental Element in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary from a Comparative Perspective’ (2008) 19 Crim L Forum473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bankowski, Z, MacCormick, DN, Summers, RS, and Wróblewski, J, ‘On Method and Methodology’ in MacCormick, DN and Summers, RS (eds.), Interpreting Statutes: A Comparative Study (Ashgate 1991) 9.Google Scholar

Baragwanath, D, ‘The Interpretative Challenges of International Adjudication across the Common Law/Civil Law Divide’, Paper presented at the Cambridge Conference on Interpretation in International Law, Lauterpacht Centre for International Law (27 August 2013) (on file with author).

Barriga, S, Danspeckgruber, W, and Wenaweser, C (eds.), The Princeton Process on the Crime of Aggression: Materials of the Special Working Group on the Crime of Aggression, 2003–2009 (Princeton University: Liechtenstein Institute on Self-Determination 2009).

Barriga, S, and Grover, L, ‘A Historic Breakthrough on the Crime of Aggression’ (2011) 105 AJIL517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barriga, S, and Kreß, C (eds.), Travaux Préparatoires of the Crime of Aggression (Cambridge University Press 2012).

Bassiouni, MC, ‘Principles of Legality in International and Comparative Law’ in Bassiouni, MC (ed.), International Criminal Law: Sources, Subjects and Contents, vol. I, 3rd edn (Martinus Nijhoff 2008) 83.Google Scholar

Bassiouni, MC, ‘Principles of Legality in International and Comparative Criminal Law’ in Bassiouni, MC (ed.), International Criminal Law: Sources, Subjects and Contents, vol. II, 3rd edn (Martinus Nijhoff 2008) 73.Google Scholar

Bassiouni, MC, The Legislative History of the International Criminal Court: Introduction, Analysis, and Integrated Text (Transnational Publishers 2005).Google Scholar

Bassiouni, MC, The Legitimacy of the International Criminal Court, vol. I (Transnational Publishers 2005).Google Scholar

Bassiouni, MC, ‘The Philosophy and Policy of International Criminal Justice’ in Vohrah, LC and Others (eds.), Man’s Inhumanity to Man: Essays on International Law in Honour of Antonio Cassese (Kluwer Law International 2003) 65.Google Scholar

Baxter, R, ‘Treaties and Custom’ (1970–I) 129 Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International31.Google Scholar

Baxter, RR, ‘The Effects of Ill-Conceived Codification and Development of International Law’ in Recueil d’études de droit international en hommage à Paul Guggenheim (Geneva 1968) 146.Google Scholar

Baxter, RR, ‘Multilateral Treaties as Evidence of Customary International Law’ (1965–1966) 41 British Ybk Int’l L275.Google Scholar

Beccaria, C, Dei delitti e delle pene (Livorno 1764).Google Scholar

Beckett, E, ‘Comments on the Report of Sir Hersch Lauterpacht’ (1950) 43(I) Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit International435.Google Scholar

Benatar, M, ‘From Probative Value to Authentic Interpretation: The Legal Effects of Interpretative Declarations’ (2011) 44 Revue Belge de Droit International170.Google Scholar

Bentham, J, ‘Principles of International Law’ in The Works of Jeremy Bentham, vol. II (published under the superintendence of his executor J Bowring [W Tait 1838–1843]) 535.

Bernhardt, R, ‘Evolutive Treaty Interpretation, Especially of the European Convention on Human Rights’ (1999) 42 German Ybk Int’l L11.Google Scholar

Bianchi, A, ‘Textual Interpretation and (International) Law Reading: The Myth of (In)determinacy and the Genealogy of Meaning’ in Making Transnational Law Work in the Global Economy: Essays in Honour of Detlev Vagts (Cambridge University Press 2010) 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bitti, G, ‘Article 21 of the Statute of the International Criminal Court and the Treatment of Sources of Law in the Jurisprudence of the ICC’ in Stahn, C and Sluiter, G (eds.), The Emerging Practice of the International Criminal Court (Brill 2009) 281.Google Scholar

Bjorge, E, The Evolutionary Interpretation of Treaties (Oxford University Press 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blackstone, W, Commentaries on the Laws of England, vols. 1–4 (Clarendon Oxford 1765–1769).Google Scholar

Boas, G, ‘An Overview of Implementation by Australia of the Statute of the International Criminal Court’ (2004) 2 J Int’l Crim Justice179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boister, N, ‘The Exclusion of Treaty Crimes from the Jurisdiction for the Proposed International Criminal Court: Law, Pragmatism, Politics’ (1998) 3 J Conflict & Security Law27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bolton, JR, Former Under Secretary for Arms Control and International Security, ‘The United States and the International Criminal Court’, Remarks to the Federalist Society in Washington, DC, 2002, , accessed 2 November 2013.

Boot, M, Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity, War Crimes: Nullum Crimen Sine Lege and the Subject Matter Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court (Intersentia 2002).Google Scholar

Boot, M, Dixon, R, and Hall, H (revised by Hall, C), ‘Article 7’ in Triffterer, O (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 2nd edn (CH Beck/Hart/Nomos 2008) 159.Google Scholar

Bos, A, ‘From the International Law Commission to the Rome Conference (1994–1999)’ in Cassese, A and Others (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, vol. I (Oxford University Press 2002) 35.Google Scholar

Bos, A, ‘The International Criminal Court: A Perspective’ in Lee, RS and Others (eds.), The International Criminal Court: The Making of the Rome Statute (Kluwer Law International 1999) 463.Google Scholar

Bos, M, ‘Theory and Practice of Treaty Interpretation’, (1980) 27 Netherlands Int’l L Rev 3, 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bourgon, S, ‘Jurisdiction Ratione Temporis’ in Cassese, A and Others (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, vol. I (Oxford University Press 2002) 545.Google Scholar

Bowring, B, ‘Fragmentation, Lex Specialis and the Tensions in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights’ (2009) 14 J Conflict & Security L485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brierly, JL, ‘The Codification of International Law’ in Lauterpacht, H and Waldock, CHM (eds.), The Basis of Obligation in International Law and Other Papers by the Late James Leslie Brierly (Clarendon Press 1958) 338.Google Scholar

Brierly, JL, ‘The Future of Codification’ (1921) 12 British Ybk Int’l L1.Google Scholar

Broomhall, B, ‘Article 22’ in Triffterer, O (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 2nd edn (CH Beck/Hart/Nomos 2008) 713.Google Scholar

Brownlie, I, Principles of Public International Law, 6th edn (Oxford University Press 2003).Google Scholar

Byers, M, Custom, Power and the Power of Rules (Cambridge University Press 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cassese, A, International Criminal Law, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press 2008).Google Scholar

Cassese, A, ‘Balancing the Prosecution of Crimes against Humanity and Non-Retroactive Criminal Law: The Kolk and Kislyiy v. Estonia Case before the ECHR’ (2006) 4 J Int’l Crim Justice410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cassese, A, International Law, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cassese, A, ‘The Influence of the European Court of Human Rights on International Criminal Tribunals – Some Methodological Remarks’ in Bergsmo, M (ed.), Human Rights and Criminal Justice for the Downtrodden: Essays in Honour of Asbjørn Eide (Martinus Nijhoff 2003) 157.Google Scholar

Cassese, A, ‘From Nuremberg to Rome: International Military Tribunals to the International Criminal Court’ in Cassese, A and Others (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, vol. I (Oxford University Press 2002) 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cassese, A, ‘The Statute of the International Criminal Court: Some Preliminary Reflections’ (1999) 10 EJIL144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cassese, A, ‘Definition of Crimes and General Principles of Criminal Law as Reflected in the International Tribunal’s Jurisprudence’, Memo to Members of the Preparatory Committee on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court (22 March 1996), , accessed 3 July 2014.

Center for International Policy, ‘“Article 98” Agreements and the International Criminal Court’ (4 June 2007), , accessed 9 March 2011.

Chodosh, H, ‘An Interpretive Theory of International Law: The Distinction Between Treaty and Customary Law’ (1995) 28 Vanderbilt J Transnat’l L973.Google Scholar

Christoffersen, J, ‘Impact on General Principles of Treaty Interpretation’ in Kamminga, MT and Scheinin, M (eds.), The Impact of Human Rights Law on General International Law (Oxford University Press 2009) 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, R, ‘Article 9’ in Triffterer, O (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 2nd edn (CH Beck/Hart/Nomos 2008) 505.Google Scholar

Clark, R, ‘Article 106’ in Triffterer, O (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 2nd edn (CH Beck/Hart/Nomos 2008) 1663.Google Scholar

Clark, R, ‘Article 121’ in Triffterer, O (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 2nd edn (CH Beck/Hart/Nomos 2008) 1751.Google Scholar

Clark, R, ‘Elements of Crimes in Early Confirmation Decisions of Pre-Trial Chambers of the International Criminal Court’ (2008) 6 New Zealand Ybk Int’l L209.Google Scholar

Clark, R, ‘Rethinking Aggression as a Crime and Formulating its Elements: the Final Work-Product of the Preparatory Commission for the International Criminal Court’ (2002) 15 LJIL859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, R, ‘The Mental Element in International Criminal Law’ (2001) 12 Criminal Law Forum291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, R, ‘Article 119’ in Triffterer, O (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 1st edn (NVG Baden-Baden 1999) 1241.Google Scholar

Clark, R, ‘Treaty and Custom’ in de Chazournes, L Boisson and Sands, P (eds.), International Law, the International Court of Justice and Nuclear Weapons (Cambridge University Press 1999) 171.Google Scholar

Clayton, R, and Tomlinson, H, The Law of Human Rights, vol. I, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press 2009).Google Scholar

Coalition for the International Criminal Court, Report of the CICC Team on the Crime of Aggression (2005).

Corten, O, and Klein, E (eds.), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (Oxford University Press 2011).CrossRef

Cottier, M, ‘Article 8’ in Triffterer, O (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 2nd edn (CH Beck/Hart/Nomos 2008) 275.Google Scholar

Crawford, J, The International Law Commission’s Articles on State Responsibility: Introduction, Text and Commentaries (Cambridge University Press 2002).Google Scholar

Crawford, J, ‘The Work of the International Law Commission’ in Cassese, A and Others (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, vol. I (Oxford University Press 2002) 23.Google Scholar

Crawford, J, ‘The ILC’s Draft Statute for an International Criminal Tribunal’ (1984) 88 AJIL140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crema, L, ‘Disappearance and New Sightings of Restrictive Interpretation(s)’ (2010) 21:3 EJIL681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cryer, R, ‘The Interplay of Human Rights and Humanitarian Law: The Approach of the ICTY’ (2010) 14:3 J Conflict & Security L511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cryer, R, ‘Royalism and the King: Article 21 of the Rome Statute and the Politics of Sources’ (2009) 12 New Crim L Rev390.Google Scholar

Cryer, R, ‘The Doctrinal Foundations of International Criminalization’ in Bassiouni, MC (ed.), International Criminal Law, vol. I, 3rd edn (Martinus Nijhoff 2008) 107.Google Scholar

Cryer, R, ‘Of Custom, Treaties, Scholars and the Gavel: The Influence of the International Criminal Tribunals on the ICRC Customary Law Study’ (2006) 11 J Conflict & Security L239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cryer, R, Prosecuting International Crimes: Selectivity and the International Criminal Law Regime (Cambridge University Press 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

D’Amato, A, ‘International Law, Intertemporal Problems’ (1992) Encyclopedia of Public Int’l L 1234.

D’Amato, A, ‘Manifest Intent and the Generation by Treaty of Customary Rules of International Law’ (1970) 64 AJIL892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Danilenko, GM, ‘ICC Statute and Third States’ in Cassese, A and Others (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, vol. II (Oxford University Press 2002) 1871.Google Scholar

Danilenko, GM, ‘The Statute of the International Criminal Court and Third States’ (1999–2000) 21 Mich J Int’l L445.Google Scholar

Danner, AM, and Martinez, JS, ‘Guilty Associations: Joint Criminal Enterprise, Command Responsibility, and the Development of International Criminal Law’ (2005) 93 California L Rev75.Google Scholar

d’Aspremont, J, ‘Articulating International Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law: Conciliatory Interpretation under the Guise of Conflict of Norms-Resolution’ in Fitzmaurice, M and Merkouris, P (eds.), The Interpretation and Application of the European Convention on Human Rights: Legal and Practical Implications (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2013) 4.Google Scholar

de Guzman, MM, ‘Article 21’ in Triffterer, O (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 2nd edn (CH Beck/Hart/Nomos 2008) 701.Google Scholar

de Guzman, MM, ‘Gravity and the Legitimacy of the International Criminal Court’ (2008) 32 Fordham Int’l LJ1400.Google Scholar

Dennis, MJ, ‘Application of Human Rights Treaties Extraterritorially in Times of Armed Conflict and Military Occupation’ (2005) 99 AJIL119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Visscher, C, Theory and Reality in International Law, Corbett, P (trans.), rev. edn (Princeton University Press 1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Visscher, C, Problèmes d’Interpretation Judiciaire en Droit International Public (Pedone 1963).Google Scholar

de Wet, E, ‘The Security Council as a Law Maker: The Adoption of (Quasi)-Judicial Decisions’ in Wolfrum, R and Röben, V (eds.), Developments in International Law in Treaty Making (Springer 2005) 183.Google Scholar

Dinstein, Y, ‘Interaction Between Customary International Law and Treaties’ (2006) 322 Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International243.Google Scholar

Dinstein, Y, ‘Crimes against Humanity and the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court’, Paper presented at the Universality of Human Rights Conference (German Innovation Center/IDC Herzliya and the Science Center of North Rhine-Westphalia 2005).

Dörmann, K, ‘Article 8’ in Triffterer, O (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 2nd edn (CH Beck/Hart/Nomos 2008) 275.Google Scholar

Dörmann, K, International Committee of the Red Cross, Elements of War Crimes under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Sources and Commentary (Cambridge University Press 2003).Google Scholar

Dörmann, K, ‘Contributions by the Ad Hoc Tribunals for the Former Yugoslavia and Rwanda to the Ongoing Work on Elements of Crimes in the Context of the ICC’ (2000) 94 ASIL Proceedings284.Google Scholar

Dörr, O, ‘General Rule of Interpretation’ in Dörr, O and Schmalenbach, K (eds.), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (Springer 2012) 521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doherty, TA, ‘The Application of Human Rights Treaties in the Development of Domestic and International Law: A Personal Perspective’ (2009) 22:4 LJIL753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doswald-Beck, L, ‘The Right to Life in Armed Conflict: Does International Humanitarian Law Provide all the Answers?’(2006) 88:864 Int’l Rev of the Committee of the Red Cross881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Droege, C, ‘Elective Affinities? Human Rights and Humanitarian Law’ (2008) 90:871 Int’l Rev of the Committee of the Red Cross501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duffy, H, ‘Human Rights Litigation and the ‘War on Terror’’ (2008) 90:871 Int’l Rev of the Committee of the Red Cross573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eide, A, Rosas, A, and Meron, T, ‘Combating Lawlessness in Gray Zone Conflicts Through Minimum Humanitarian Standards’ (1995) 89 AJIL215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elias, TO, The International Court of Justice and Some Contemporary Problems (Brill 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elias, TO, The Modern Law of Treaties (Oceana 1974).Google Scholar

Eser, A, ‘Article 31’ in Triffterer, O (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 2nd edn (CH Beck/Hart/Nomos 2008) 863.Google Scholar

EskridgeJr., WN, ‘Dynamic Statutory Interpretation’ (1987) 135 Univ Pennsylvania LR1479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fernández de Gurmendi, SA, ‘The Process of Negotiations’ in Lee, RS (ed.), The International Criminal Court: The Making of the Rome Statute (Kluwer Law International 1999) 217.Google Scholar

Fish, S, Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities (Harvard University Press 1980).Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, GG, ‘The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice 1951–1954: Treaty Interpretation and Other Treaty Points’ (1957) 33 British Ybk Int’l L203.Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, GG, ‘The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice: Treaty Interpretation and Certain Other Treaty Points’ (1951) 28 British Ybk Int’l L1.Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, M, ‘Dynamic (Evolutive) Interpretation of Treaties’ (2008) 21 Hague Ybk Int’l L101.Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, M, ‘Third Parties and the Law of Treaties’ (2002) 6 Max Planck Ybk of UN L37.Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, M, Elias, O, and Merkouris, P, Treaty Interpretation and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: 30 Years On (Martinus Nijhoff 2010).Google Scholar

Fletcher, G, Basic Concepts of Criminal Law (Oxford University Press 1998).Google Scholar

Fletcher, G, Rethinking Criminal Law (Little, Brown 1978).Google Scholar

French, D, ‘Treaty Interpretation and the Incorporation of Extraneous Legal Rules’ (2006) 55 Int’l Comp L Quart281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frulli, M, ‘Jurisdiction Ratione Personae’ in Cassese, A and Others (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, vol. I (Oxford University Press 2002) 527.Google Scholar

Gaeta, P, ‘The Defence of Superior Orders: The Statute of the International Criminal Court versus Customary International Law’ (1999) 10 EJIL172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gallant, KS, The Principle of Legality in International and Comparative Criminal Law (Cambridge University Press 2009).Google Scholar

Gallant, KS, ‘Jurisdiction to Adjudicate and Jurisdiction to Prescribe in International Criminal Courts’ (2003) 48 Vill L Rev763.Google Scholar

Gallant, KS, ‘Individual Human Rights in a New International Organization: The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court’ in Bassiouni, MC (ed.), International Criminal Law, 2nd edn (Transnational Publishers 1999) 693.Google Scholar

Gardiner, R, Treaty Interpretation (Oxford University Press 2008).Google Scholar

Geddes, RS, ‘Purpose and Context in Statutory Interpretation’ (2005) 2 Univ of New England LJ5.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, T, ‘Bounded Discretion in International Judicial Lawmaking’ (2005) 45 Virginia J Int’l L631.Google Scholar

Glaser, S, ‘Nullum Crimen Sine Lege’ (1942) 24 J Comp Legis & Int’l L29.Google Scholar

Graditzky, T, ‘War Crimes Issues Before the Rome Diplomatic Conference on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court’ (1999) 5 UC Davis J Int’l Law and Policy199.Google Scholar

Hafner, G, ‘Article 120’ in Triffterer, O (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 2nd edn (Beck/Hart/Nomos 2008) 1737.Google Scholar

Hafner, G, and Binder, C, ‘The Interpretation of Article 21(3) ICC Statute Opinion Reviewed’ (2004) 9 Austrian Rev Int’l and Eur L163.Google Scholar

Hale, B, ‘Common Law and Convention Law: The Limits to Interpretation’ (2011) 16:5 European HR L Rev534.Google Scholar

Hall, CK, ‘Première proposition de creation d’une cour criminelle international permanente’ (1998) 80:829 Int’l Rev of the Committee of the Red Cross59.Google Scholar

Hall, J, ‘Nulla Poena Sine Lege’ (1937) 47 Yale LJ165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hall, L, ‘Strict or Liberal Construction of Penal Statutes’ (1935) 48 Harvard L Rev748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hampson, FJ, ‘The Relationship between International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law from the Perspective of a Human Rights Treaty Body’ (2009) 90:871 Int’l Rev of the Committee of the Red Cross549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hart, HLA, The Concept of Law (Oxford University Press 1961).Google Scholar

Haveman, R, ‘The Principle of Legality’ in Haveman, R, Kavran, O and Nicholls, J (eds.), Supranational Criminal Law: A System Sui Generis (Intersentia 2003) 39.Google Scholar

Hay, J, ‘Implementing the ICC Statute in New Zealand’ (2004) 2 J Int’l Crim Justice191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heintze, HJ, ‘On the Relationship between Human Rights Law Protection and International Humanitarian Law’ (2004) 86:856 Int’l Rev of the Committee of the Red Cross789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heller, KJ, ‘The Uncertain Legal Status of the Aggression Understandings’ (2012) 10 J Int’l Crim Justice229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heller, KJ, ‘Mistake of Legal Element, the Common Law, and Article 32 of the Rome Statute: A Critical Analysis’ (2008) 6 J Int’l Crim Justice419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heller, KJ, ‘Retreat from Nuremberg – the Leadership Requirement in the Crime of Aggression’ (2007) 18 EJIL477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henckaerts, J-M, ‘Assessing the Laws and Customs of War: The Publication of Customary International Humanitarian Law’ (2006) Human Rights Brief 8.

Henckaerts, J-M, ‘The ICRC Study on Customary International Humanitarian Law – An Assessment’ in Maybee, L and Chakka, B (eds.), Custom as a Source of International Humanitarian Law (International Committee of the Red Cross 2006) 43.Google Scholar

Henckearts, J-M, and Doswald-Beck, L, Customary International Humanitarian Law (Cambridge University Press 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Higgins, R, ‘The Relationship between the International Criminal Court and the International Court of Justice’ in von Hebel, H, Lammers, JG and Schukking, J (eds.), Reflections on the International Criminal Court: Essays in Honour of Adriaan Bos (TMC Asser Press 1999) 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Higgins, R, ‘Time and the Law: International Perspectives on an Old Problem’ (1997) 46:3 Int’l Comp LQ501.Google Scholar

Higgins, R, ‘Some Observations on the Inter-Temporal Rule in International Law’ in Makarczyk, J (ed.), Theory of International Law at the Threshold of the 21st Century: Essays in Honour of Krzysztof Skubiszewski (Kluwer Law International 1996) 173.Google Scholar

Hobbes, T, Leviathan (JM Dent & Sons Ltd 1970).Google Scholar

Hogg, JF, ‘The International Court: Rules of Treaty Interpretation’ (1958) 43 Minn L Rev369.Google Scholar

Hollis, H, ‘The Existential Function of Interpretation in International Law’, Paper presented at the Cambridge Conference on Interpretation in International Law, Lauterpacht Centre for International Law (27 August 2013), , accessed 18 October 2013.

Hunt, D, ‘The International Criminal Court – High Hopes, ‘Creative Ambiguity’ and an Unfortunate Mistrust in International Judges’ (2004) 2:1 J Int’l Crim Justice56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Husak, DN, and Callender, CA, ‘Wilful Ignorance, Knowledge, and the “Equal Culpability” Thesis: A Study of the Deeper Significance of the Principle of Legality’ (1994) Wis L Rev 29.

Institut de Droit International, ‘Obligations and Rights Erga Omnes in International Law’ (Krakow Session 2005) 71-II Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit International289.Google Scholar

Institut de Droit International, ‘Problems Arising from a Succession of Codification Conventions on a Particular Subject’ (Lisbon Session 1995) 66-I Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit International39.Google Scholar

Institut de Droit International, ‘The Protection of Human Rights and the Principle of Non-Intervention in Internal Affairs of States’ (Santiago de Compostela Session 1989) 63-II Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit International341.Google Scholar

Institut de Droit International, ‘The Intertemporal Problem in Public International Law’ (Wiesbaden Session 1975) 56:I Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit International536.Google Scholar

International Criminal Court, Report of the International Criminal Court to the UN General Assembly, 13 August 2013, UN Doc. A/68/314.

International Law Association, Committee on International Human Rights Law and Practice, Final Report on the Impact of the Findings of the United Nations Human Rights Treaty Bodies, Berlin Conference (2004).

International Law Commission, ‘Guide to Practice on Reservations to Treaties with Commentaries’ (2011) II (Part Two) Ybk of the ILC1.Google Scholar

International Law Commission, ‘Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of its Sixty-Third Session (26 April to 3 June and 4 July to 12 August 2011)’, UN Doc. A/66/10 and Add.1, 553.

International Law Commission, ‘Guidelines on Reservations to a Provision Reflecting a Customary Norm’ (2007) II (Part Two) Ybk of the ILC88.Google Scholar

International Law Commission, ‘Conclusions of the Work of the Study Group on the Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law’ (2006) II (Part Two) Ybk of the ILC.Google Scholar

International Law Commission, ‘Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of its Fifty-Third Session’ (2001), UN Doc. A/56/10.

International Law Commission, ‘Draft Code of Crimes against the Peace and Security of Mankind’ (1996), UN Doc. A/CN.4/L.522.

International Law Commission, ‘Report of the International Law Commission on the work of its Forty-Eighth Session (6 May–26 July 1996)’ (1996) II (Part Two) Ybk of the ILC1.Google Scholar

International Law Commission, ‘Draft Code of Crimes against the Peace and Security of Mankind’ (1994) II (Part Two) Ybk of the ILC18.Google Scholar

International Law Commission, ‘Draft Statute for an International Criminal Court’ (1994), UN Doc. A/49/10.

International Law Commission, ‘Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of its Forty-Sixth Session (2 May–22 July 1994)’, UN Doc. A/49/10.

International Law Commission, ‘Comments and Observations of Governments on the Draft Code of Crimes against the Peace and Security of Mankind adopted on First Reading by the International Law Commission at its Forty-Third Session’ (1993), UN Doc. A/CN.4/448.

International Law Commission, ‘Eleventh Report on the Draft Code of Crimes against the Peace and Security of Mankind’ (1993), UN Doc. A/CN.4/449 and Corr.1.

International Law Commission, ‘Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of its Forty-Fifth Session (3 May–23 July 1993)’, UN Doc. A/48/10.

International Law Commission, ‘Ninth Report on the Draft Code of Crimes against the Peace and Security of Mankind’ (1991), UN Doc. A/CN.4/435 & Corr.1 and Add.1 & Corr.1.

International Law Commission, ‘Topical Summary of the Discussion held in the Sixth Committee of the General Assembly during its Forty-Fifth Session’ (1991), UN Doc. A/CN.4/L.456.

International Law Commission, ‘Review of the Multilateral Treaty-Making Process’ (1979) II Ybk of the ILC183.Google Scholar

International Law Commission, ‘Reports of the International Law Commission on the Second Part of its Seventeenth Session and on its Eighteenth Session’ (1966) II Ybk of the ILC169.Google Scholar

International Law Commission, ‘Summary Records of the Sixteenth Session’ (1964) I Ybk of the ILC1.Google Scholar

International Law Commission, ‘Draft Code of Offences against the Peace and Security of Mankind’ (1954) I Ybk of the ILC123.Google Scholar

International Law Commission, ‘Draft Code of Offences Against the Peace and Security of Mankind’ (1951) II Ybk of the ILC58.Google Scholar

International Law Commission, ‘Formulation of the Nuremberg Principles’ (1950) II Ybk of the ILC181.Google Scholar

International Law Commission, ‘Report of the International Law Commission covering its Second Session’ (1950) II Ybk of the ILC364.Google Scholar

International Committee of the Red Cross, ‘Statement of 8 July 1998 Relating to the Bureau Discussion Paper in Document A/CONF.183/C.1/L.53’, UN Doc. A/CONF.183/INF/10.

Jackson, RH, The Nürnberg Case (Cooper Square 1947).Google Scholar

Jacobs, D, ‘Positivism and International Criminal Law: The Principle of Legality as a Rule of Conflict of Theories’ in Aspremont, J d and Kammerhofer, J (eds.), International Legal Positivism in a Post-Modern World (Cambridge University Press, forthcoming October 2014), , accessed 16 October 2013.Google Scholar

JeffriesJr, JC, ‘Legality, Vagueness, and the Construction of Penal Statutes’ (1985) 71 Virginia L Rev189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jenks, CW, ‘The Conflict of Law-Making Treaties’ (1953) 30 British Ybk Int’l L401.Google Scholar

Jennings, RY, Interview in Antonio Cassese, Five Masters of International Law (Hart Publishing 2011) 115.Google Scholar

Jennings, RY, ‘Amendment and Modification of Treaties’ (1967) 121 Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International544.Google Scholar

Jennings, RY, ‘The Progress of International Law’ (1958) 34 British Ybk Int’l L334.Google Scholar

Jennings, RY, ‘The Progressive Development of International Law’ (1947) 24 British Ybk Int’l L301.Google Scholar

Jennings, R, and Watts, A, Oppenheim’s International Law, 9th edn (Longman Harlow 1992).Google Scholar

Jessberger, F, ‘Bad Torture – Good Torture? What International Criminal Lawyers May Learn from the Recent Trial of Police Officers in Germany’ (2005) 3 J Int’l Crim Justice1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jessup, P, ‘The Palmas Island Arbitration’ (1928) 22 AJIL739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jia, BB, ‘The Relations between Treaties and Custom’ (2010) 9 Chinese J Int’l L81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, JRWD, ‘Composition of the Court’ in Cassese, A and Others (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, vol. I (Oxford University Press 2002) 235.Google Scholar

Juratowitch, B, ‘Retroactive Criminal Liability and International Human Rights Law’ (2004) 75:1 British Ybk Int’l L337.Google Scholar

Kälin, W, and Künzli, J, The Law of International Human Rights Protection (Oxford University Press 2009).Google Scholar

Kamminga, MT, ‘Final Report on the Impact of International Human Rights Law on General International Law’ in Kamminga, MT and Scheinin, M (eds.), The Impact of Human Rights Law on General International Law (Oxford University Press 2009) 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keller, H, and Stone Sweet, A, ‘Assessing the Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems’ in Keller, H and Stone Sweet, A (eds.), A Europe of Rights (Oxford University Press 2008) 677.Google Scholar

Kelsen, H, ‘Will the Judgment in the Nuremberg Trial Constitute a Precedent in International Law?’ (1947) 1:2 Int’l LQ153.Google Scholar

Kelsen, H, ‘The Rule Against Ex Post Facto Laws and the Prosecution of the Axis War Criminals’ (1945) II:3 The Judge Advocate J8.Google Scholar

Kelt, M and von Hebel, H, ‘The Making of the Elements of Crimes: What are Elements of Crimes?’ in Lee, R and Others (eds.), The International Criminal Court: Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence (Transnational 2001) 13.Google Scholar

Kirsch, P, ‘Customary International Humanitarian Law, its Enforcement, and the Role of the International Criminal Court’ in Maybee, L and Chakka, B (eds.), Custom as a Source of International Humanitarian Law (ICRC 2006) 79.Google Scholar

Kirsch, P, ‘Foreword’ in Dörmann, K, Elements of War Crimes under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (Cambridge University Press 2003) xiii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirsch, P, ‘The Work of the Preparatory Commission’ in Lee, RS (ed.), The International Criminal Court: Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence (Transnational 2001) xlv.Google Scholar

Kirsch, P, ‘The Development of the Rome Statute’ in Lee, RS and Others (eds.), The International Criminal Court: The Making of the Rome Statute (Kluwer Law International 1999) 451.Google Scholar

Kirsch, P, and Holmes, JT, ‘The Rome Conference on an International Criminal Court: The Negotiating Process’ (1999) 93 AJIL2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirsch, P, ‘The Birth of the International Criminal Court: The 1998 Rome Conference’ (1998) 36 Canadian Ybk Int’l L3.Google Scholar

Kirsch, P, and Oosterveld, V, ‘The Post-Rome Conference Preparatory Commission’ in Cassese, A and Others (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, vol. I (Oxford University Press 2002) 94.Google Scholar

Kirsch, P, and Robinson, D, ‘Reaching Agreement at the Rome Conference’ in Cassese, A and Others (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, vol. I (Oxford University Press 2002) 67.Google Scholar

Kitichaiseree, K, International Criminal Law (Oxford University Press 2001).Google Scholar

Koh, HH, US Department of State, ‘Remarks’, Panel Discussion at the NYU Center For Global Affairs (27 October 2010), , accessed 5 November 2013.

Kolb, R, Interprétation et Création du Droit International: Equisse d’une herméneutique juridique modern pour le droit international public (Bruylant 2006).Google Scholar

Kontou, N, The Termination and Revision of Treaties in the Light of New Customary International Law (Oxford University Press 1994).Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M, ‘Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law: Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission’ (4 April 2006), UN Doc. A/CN.4/L.682.

Koskenniemi, M, From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument (Cambridge University Press 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koskenniemi, M, ‘Study on the Function and Scope of the Lex Specialis Rule and the Question of “Self Contained Regimes”’ (2004), UN Doc. ILC(LVI)/SG/FIL/CRD.1 and Add.1.

Kreß, C, ‘Harmony and Dissonance in International Law’ (2011) 105 ASIL Proceedings160.Google Scholar

Kreß, C, ‘The Crime of Genocide and Contextual Elements’ (2009) 7 J Int’l Crim Justice297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kreß, C, ‘Time for Decision: Some Thoughts on the Immediate Future of the Crime of Aggression: A Reply to Andreas Paulus’ (2009) 20 EJIL1139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kreß, C, ‘International Criminal Law’ in Wolfrum, R (ed.), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (2008–), online edition, , accessed 15 March 2011.

Kreß, C, ‘Nullum Crimen, Nulla Poena Sine Lege’ in Wolfrum, R (ed.), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (2008–), online edition, , accessed 15 March 2011.

Kreß, C, ‘The Crime of Genocide under International Law’ (2006) 6 Int’l Comp L Rev461.Google Scholar

Kreß, C, ‘War Crimes Committed in Non-International Armed Conflict and the Emerging System of International Criminal Justice’ (2000) 30 Israel Ybk Human Rights103.Google Scholar

Kreß, C, Barriga, S, Grover, L and von Holtzendorff, L, ‘Negotiating the Understandings on the Crime of Aggression’ in Barriga, S and Kreß, C (eds.), Travaux Préparatoires of the Crime of Aggression (Cambridge University Press 2012) 81.Google Scholar

Kreß, C, and von Holtzendorff, L, ‘The Kampala Compromise on the Crime of Aggression’ (2010) 8 J Int’l Crim Justice1179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kretzmer, D, ‘Rethinking Application of IHL in Non-International Armed Conflicts’ (2009) 42 Israel L Rev32.Google Scholar

Krieger, H, ‘A Conflict of Norms: The Relationship between Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law in the ICRC Customary Law Study’ (2006) 11 J Conflict & Security265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kulovesi, K, ‘Legality or Otherwise? Nuclear Weapons and the Strategy of Non Liquet’ (1999) 10 Finnish Ybk Int’l Law55.Google Scholar

Lamb, S, ‘Nullum Crimen, Nulla Poena Sine Lege in International Criminal Law’ in Cassese, A and Others (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, vol. I (Oxford University Press 2002) 733.Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, H, The Development of International Law by the International Court (Praeger 1958).Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, H, ‘Codification and Development of International Law’ (1955) 49 AJIL16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lauterpacht, H, ‘Restrictive Interpretation and the Principle of Effectiveness in the Interpretation of Treaties’ (1949) 26 British Ybk Int’l L48.Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, H, The Function of Law in the International Community (Oxford University Press 1933).Google Scholar

Laws, Lord J, ‘The Good Constitution’, Sir David Williams Lecture, Cambridge (4 May 2012), , accessed 18 October 2013.

Lee, RS, ‘Introduction’ in Lee, RS (ed.), The International Criminal Court: Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence (Transnational 2001) Iv.Google Scholar

Lee, RS, ‘Introduction’ in Lee, RS and Others (eds.), The International Criminal Court: The Making of the Rome Statute (Kluwer Law International 1999) 1.Google Scholar

Liang, YL, ‘The Establishment of an International Criminal Jurisdiction: The Second Phase’ (1953) 47 AJIL638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lietzau, WK, ‘Checks and Balances and Elements of Proof: Structural Pillars for the International Criminal Court’ (1999) 32 Cornell Int’l LJ477.Google Scholar

Linderfalk, U, On the Interpretation of Treaties: the Modern International Law as Expressed in the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (Springer 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lindroos, A, ‘Addressing the Norm Conflicts in a Fragmented System: the Doctrine of Lex Specialis’ (2005) 74 Nordic J Int’l L27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacCormick, DN, and Summers, RS (eds.), Interpreting Statutes: A Comparative Study (Ashgate 1991).

Maxwell, PB, The Interpretation of Statutes, 7th edn (GFL Bridgman 1929).Google Scholar

McCarthy, C, ‘Legal Conclusion or Interpretive Process? Lex Specialis and the Applicability of International Human Rights Standards’ in Arnold, R and Quénivet, N (eds.), International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law (Martinus Nijhoff 2008) 101.Google Scholar

McCormack, TLH, and Robertson, S, ‘Jurisdictional Aspects of the Rome Statute for the New International Criminal Court’ (1999) 23 Melb U L Rev635.Google Scholar

McCrudden, C, ‘Human Dignity and Judicial Interpretation of Human Rights’ (2008) 19 EJIL655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McDougal, MS, ‘The International Law Commission’s Draft Articles Upon Interpretation: Textuality Redivivus’ (1967) 61 AJIL992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McLachlan, C, ‘The Principle of Systemic Integration and Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention’ (2005) 54:2 Int’l Comp LQ279.Google Scholar

McLachlin, B, ‘Judging in a Democratic State’, Speech (3 June 2004), , accessed 23 April 2014.

McNair, AD, The Law of Treaties (Oxford University Press 1961).Google Scholar

McNair, AD, ‘The Functions and Differing Legal Character of Treaties’ (1930) 11 British Ybk Int’l L100.Google Scholar

McRae, DM, ‘Approaches to the Interpretation of Treaties: the European Court of Human Rights and the WTO Appellate Body’ in Breitenmoser, S and Others (eds.), Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law: Liber amicorum Luzius Wildhaber (Nomos 2007) 1407.Google Scholar

McRae, DM, ‘The Legal Effect of Interpretative Declarations’ (1978) 49 British Ybk Int’l L155.Google Scholar

Mendelson, M, ‘Remarks: Disentangling Treaty and Customary International Law’ (1987) 81 ASIL Proceedings157.Google Scholar

Meron, T, ‘Remarks’ (2009) 103 ASIL Proceedings8.Google Scholar

Meron, T, ‘Customary Law’ in Dworkin, R, Gutman, R and Rieff, D (eds.), Crimes of War 2.0: What the Public Should Know, rev. and expanded edn (WW Norton 2008).Google Scholar

Meron, T, ‘Revival of Customary International Humanitarian Law’ (2005) 99 AJIL817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meron, T, ‘International Law in the Age of Human Rights’ (2003) 301 Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International9.Google Scholar

Meron, T, ‘The Humanization of Humanitarian Law’ (2000) 94 AJIL239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meron, T, ‘Crimes under the Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court’ in von Hebel, H, Lammers, JG and Schukking, J (eds.), Reflections on the International Criminal Court: Essays in Honour of Adriaan Bos (TMC Asser Press 1999) 47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mettraux, G, International Crimes and the Ad Hoc Tribunals (Oxford University Press 2005).Google Scholar

Meyer, RV, ‘Following Historical Precedent: An Argument for the Continued Use of Military Professionals as Triers of Fact in Some Humanitarian Law Tribunals’ (2009) 7 J Int’l Crim Justice43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milanovic, M, ‘A Norm Conflict Perspective on the Relationship Between International and Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law’ (2009) 14:3 J Conflict & Security L459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mokhtar, A, ‘Nullum Crimen, Nulla Poena Sine Lege: Aspects and Prospects’ (2005) 26 Statute L Rev41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montesquieu, C, De l’esprit des lois (Barillot 1748).Google Scholar

Møse, E, ‘Impact of Human Rights Conventions on the Two Ad Hoc Tribunals’ in Bergsmo, M (ed.), Human Rights and Criminal Justice for the Downtrodden: Essays in Honour of Asbjørn Eide (Martinus Nijhoff 2003) 179.Google Scholar

Murphy, SD, ‘Efforts to Obtain Immunity from ICC for US Peacekeepers’ (2002) 96 AJIL725.Google Scholar

Nissel, A, ‘Continuing Crimes in the Rome Statute’ (2004) 25 Michigan J Int’l L653.Google Scholar

Nolte, G, ‘Jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice and Arbitral Tribunals of Ad Hoc Jurisdiction Relating to Subsequent Agreements and Subsequent Practice: Introductory Report for the ILC Study Group on Treaties over Time’ in Nolte, G (ed.), Treaties and Subsequent Practice (Oxford University Press 2013) 169.Google Scholar

Nolte, G, ‘Second Report for the ILC Study Group on Treaties over Time: Jurisprudence under Special Regimes Relating to Subsequent Agreements and Subsequent Practice’ in Nolte, G (ed.), Treaties and Subsequent Practice (Oxford University Press 2013) 210.Google Scholar

Öberg, MD, ‘The Legal Effects of Resolutions of the Security Council and General Assembly in the Jurisprudence of the ICJ’ (2006) 16 EJIL879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oosterveld, V, ‘The Elements of Genocide’ in Lee, RS and Others (eds.), The International Criminal Court: Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence (Transnational 2001) 41.Google Scholar

Orakhelashvili, A, ‘The Interaction between Human Rights and Humanitarian Law: Fragmentation, Conflict, Parallelism, or Convergence?’ (2008) 19:1 EJIL161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orakhelashvili, A, The Interpretation of Acts and Public Rules in Public International Law (Oxford University Press 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orakhelashvili, A, ‘Restrictive Interpretation of Human Rights Treaties in the Recent Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights’ (2003) 14 EJIL529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orentlicher, D, ‘Criminalizing Hate Speech in the Crucible of Trial: Prosecutor v. Nahimana’ (2005) 12 New England J Int’l & Comp L17.Google Scholar

Pace, WR, and Schense, J, ‘The Role of Non-Governmental Organizations’ in Cassese, A and Others (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, vol. I (Oxford University Press 2002) 105.Google Scholar

Pace, WR, and Thieroff, M, ‘Participation of Non-governmental Organizations’ in Lee, RS (ed.), The International Criminal Court: The Making of the Rome Statute: Issues, Negotiations, Results (Kluwer Law International 1999) 391.Google Scholar

Packer, HL, The Limits of the Criminal Sanction (Stanford University Press 1968).Google Scholar

Pal, R, ‘Judgment’ in Röling, BVA and Rüter, CF (eds.), The Tokyo Judgment: The International Military Tribunal for the Far East (IMTFE) 29 April 1946–12 November 1948 (Amsterdam University Press 1977) 579.Google Scholar

Paust, JJ, ‘It’s No Defense: Nullum Crimen, International Crime and the Gingerbread Man’ (1997) 60 Albany L Rev657.Google Scholar

Paust, JJ, ‘Nullum Crimen and Related Claims’ (1997) 25 Denver J Int’l L & Policy321.Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, J, Conflict of Norms in Public International Law: How WTO Law Relates to Other Rules of International Law (Cambridge University Press 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pauwelyn, J, and Elsig, M, ‘The Politics of Treaty Interpretation: Variations and Explanations Across International Tribunals’ (3 October 2011), , accessed 16 October 2013.

Pellet, A, ‘Applicable Law’ in Cassese, A and Others (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, vol. II (Oxford University Press 2002) 1051.Google Scholar

Pellet, A, ‘Third Report on Reservations to Treaties’ (30 April 1998), UN Doc. A/CN.4/491/Add 4.

Perrin, B, ‘Searching for Law While Seeking Justice: The Difficulties of Enforcing International Humanitarian Law in International Criminal Trials’ (2008) 39 Ottawa L Rev367.Google Scholar

Pictet, J, Development and Principles of International Humanitarian Law (Martinus Nijhoff 1985).Google Scholar

Piragoff, DK, ‘Article 69’ in Triffterer, O (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 2nd edn (CH Beck/Hart/Nomos 2008) 1301.Google Scholar

Piragoff, DK, and Robinson, D, ‘Article 30’ in Triffterer, O (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 2nd edn (CH Beck/Hart/Nomos 2008) 849.Google Scholar

Pissillo-Mazzeschi, R, ‘Treaty and Custom: Reflections on the Codification of International Law’ (January and April 1997) Commonwealth L Bull 549.

Plato, , The Republic, 2nd edn (Penguin Books 1987).Google Scholar

Politi, M, ‘Elements of Crimes’ in Cassese, A and Others (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, vol. I (Oxford University Press 2002) 443.Google Scholar

Powderly, J, ‘Judicial Interpretation at the Ad Hoc Tribunals: Method from Chaos’ in Darcy, S and Powderly, J (eds.), Judicial Creativity at the International Criminal Tribunals (Oxford University Press 2010) 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Preparatory Commission, Working Group on the Crime of Aggression (Secretariat), ‘Historical Review of Developments relating to Aggression’, Part II (24 January 2002), UN Doc. PCNICC/2002/WGCA/L.1/Add.1.

Preparatory Commission, Working Group on the Crime of Aggression (Secretariat), ‘Historical Review of Developments relating to Aggression’, Part I (18 January 2002), UN Doc. PCNICC/2002/WGCA/L.1/Add.1.

Preparatory Committee, ‘Report of the Inter-Sessional Meeting from 19 to 30 January 1998 in Zutphen, The Netherlands’ (1998), UN Doc. A/AC.249/1998/L.13.

Preparatory Committee, ‘Report of the Preparatory Committee on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court’ (1998), UN Doc. A/CONF.183/2/Add.1.

Preparatory Committee, ‘Decisions taken by the Preparatory Committee at its Session held in New York 1 to 12 December 1997’ (1997) UN Doc. A/AC.249/1997/L.9/Rev.1.

Preparatory Committee, ‘Report of the Preparatory Committee on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court’, vols. I-II (1996) UN Doc. A/51/22.

Preuss, L, ‘Punishment by Analogy in National Socialist Penal Law’ (1936) 26 J Crim L & Criminology847.Google Scholar

Provost, R, International Human Rights and Humanitarian Law (Cambridge University Press 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prud’homme, N, ‘Lex Specialis: Oversimplifying a More Complex and Multifaceted Relationship?’(2007) 40:2 Israel L Rev355.Google Scholar

Ratner, SR, ‘The Schizophrenias of International Criminal Law’ (1998) 33 Texas Int’l LJ237.Google Scholar

Rawls, J, Justice as Fairness (Belknap 2001).Google Scholar

Rawls, J, ‘Public Reason Revisited’ (1997) 64 U Chi L Rev765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raz, J, The Authority of Law (Oxford University Press 1979).Google Scholar

Rescher, N, Presumption and the Practices of Tentative Cognition (Cambridge University Press 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Research in International Law of the Harvard Law School, ‘Harvard Draft Convention on the Law of Treaties’ (1935) 29 AJIL, Supp. 657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ribeiro, M, Limiting Arbitrary Power: The Vagueness Doctrine in Canadian Constitutional Law (University of British Columbia Press 2005).Google Scholar

Roberts, A, ‘Traditional and Modern Approaches to Customary International Law: A Reconciliation’ (2001) 95 AJIL757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robinson, D, ‘Legality and Our Contradictory Commitments: Some Thoughts About How We Think’ (2009) 103 ASIL Proceedings5.Google Scholar

Robinson, D, ‘The Identity Crisis of International Criminal Law’ (2008) 21 LJIL925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robinson, D, ‘The Elements for Crimes Against Humanity’ in Lee, RS and Others (eds.), The International Criminal Court: Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence (Transnational 2001) 57.Google Scholar

Robinson, D, ‘Defining “Crimes against Humanity” at the Rome Conference’ (1999) 93 AJIL43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robinson, D, and von Hebel, H, ‘Reflections on the Elements of Crimes’ in Lee, RS (ed.), The International Criminal Court: Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence (Transnational 2001) 219.Google Scholar

Robinson, PH, ‘Rules of Conduct and Rules of Adjudication’ (1990) 57 U Chic LR729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robinson, PH, ‘Legality and Discretion in the Distribution of Criminal Sanctions’ (1988) 25 Harv J on Legis393.Google Scholar

Roht-Arriaza, N, Letter to the Office of the Prosecutor on the meaning of Article 21(3), (14 December 2004) (on file with author).

Rosand, E, ‘The Security Council as “Global Legislator”: Ultra Vires or Ultra Innovative?’ (2004) 28:3 Fordham Int’l LJ542.Google Scholar

Roscini, M, ‘Great Expectations: The Implementation of the Rome Statute in Italy’ (2007) 5 J Int’l Crim Justice493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenne, S, ‘Codification of International Law’ (1984) 7 Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public Int’l L34.Google Scholar

Rosenne, S, ‘Relations between the International Law Commission and Governments’ (1965) Ybk of World Affairs 183.

Rousseau, C, Principes généraux de droit international public, vol. I (Pédone 1944).Google Scholar

Roxburgh, RF, International Conventions and Third States (Longmans, Green and Co. 1917).Google Scholar

Sadat, LN, ‘Custom, Codification and Some Thoughts about the Relationship Between the Two: Article 10 of the ICC Statute’ (2000) 49 DePaul L Rev909.Google Scholar

Sadat, LN, and Carden, SR, ‘The New International Criminal Court: An Uneasy Revolution’ (2000) 88 Georgetown LJ381.Google Scholar

Safferling, C, International Criminal Procedure (Oxford University Press 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saland, P, ‘International Criminal Law Principles’ in Lee, RS (ed.), The International Criminal Court: The Making of the Rome Statute – Issues, Negotiations, Results (Kluwer Law International 1999) 189.Google Scholar

Sands, P, ‘Treaty, Custom and the Cross-fertilization of International Law’ (1998) 1 Yale Human Rights & Development LJ85.Google Scholar

Sassòli, M, and Olson, LM, ‘The Relationship between International Humanitarian and Human Rights Law Where it Matters: Admissible Killing and Internment of Fighters in Non-International Armed Conflicts’ (2008) 90:871 Int’l Rev of the Committee of the Red Cross599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schabas, WA, The International Criminal Court: A Commentary on the Rome Statute (Oxford University Press 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schabas, WA, ‘Customary Law or “Judge-Made” Law: Judicial Creativity at the UN Criminal Tribunals’ in Doria, J, Gasser, H-P and Bassiouni, MC (eds.), The Legal Regime of the International Criminal Court: Essays in Honour of Professor Igor Blishchenko (Martinus Nijhoff 2009) 77.Google Scholar

Schabas, WA, ‘Lex Specialis? Belt and Suspenders? The Parallel Operation of Human Rights Law and the Law of Armed Conflict, and the Conundrum of Jus ad Bellum’ (2007) 40:2 Israel L Rev592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schabas, WA, An Introduction to the International Criminal Court, 2nd edn (Cambridge University Press 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schabas, WA, ‘Criminal Responsibility for Violations of Human Rights’ in Symonides, J (ed.), Human Rights: International Protection, Monitoring, Enforcement (UNESCO 2003) 281.Google Scholar

Schabas, WA, ‘Interpreting the Statutes of the Ad Hoc Tribunals’ in Vohrah, LC (ed.), Man’s Inhumanity to Man: Essays on International Law in Honour of Antonio Cassese (Kluwer Law International 2003) 847.Google Scholar

Schabas, WA, ‘Follow Up to Rome: Preparing for Entry into Force of the International Criminal Court Statute’ (1999) 20 Human Rights LJ157.Google Scholar

Schachter, O, International Law in Theory and Practice (Martinus Nijhoff 1991).Google Scholar

Schachter, O, ‘Entangled Treaty and Custom’ in Dinstein, Y (ed.), International Law at a Time of Perplexity: Essays in Honour of Shabtai Rosenne (Martinus Nijhoff 1989) 717.Google Scholar

Scharf, M, ‘Results of the Rome Conference for an International Criminal Court’ (August 1998) ASIL Insight l.

Scheffer, D, ‘The United States and the International Criminal Court’ (1999) 93 AJIL12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwarzenberger, G, ‘Myths and Realities of Treaty Interpretation: Articles 31–33 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties’ in Schwarzenberger, G, International Law and Order (Stevens & Sons 1971) 110.Google Scholar

Scobbie, I, ‘Principle or Pragmatics? The Relationship between Human Rights Law and the Law of Armed Conflict’ (2009) 14:3 J Conflict & Security L449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Seibert-Fohr, A, ‘Modern Concepts of Customary International Law as a Manifestation of a Value-Based International Order’ in Zimmermann, A and Hofmann, R (eds.), Unity and Diversity in International Law (Duncker & Humblot 2006) 257.Google Scholar

Shahabuddeen, M, ‘Does the Principle of Legality Stand in the Way of Progressive Development of Law?’ (2004) 2 J Int’l Crim Justice1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shelton, D, ‘Introduction’ in Shelton, D (ed.), International Law and Domestic Legal Systems: Incorporation, Transformation, and Persuasion (Oxford University Press 2011) 1.Google Scholar

Sheppard, D, ‘The International Criminal Court and “Internationally Recognized Human Rights”: Understanding Article 21(3) of the Rome Statute’ (2010) 10 Int’l Crim L Rev43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shihata, IFI, The Power of the International Court to Determine its own Jurisdiction: Compétence de la Compétence (Martinus Nijhoff 1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simma, B, ‘The General Assembly: Function and Powers’ in Simma, B and Others (eds.), The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary, vol. I, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press 2002) 257.Google Scholar

Simma, B, ‘From Bilateralism to Community Interest in International Law’ (1994) 250 Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International217.Google Scholar

Simma, B, and Alston, P, ‘The Sources of Human Rights Law: Custom, Jus Cogens, and General Principles’ (1988–1989) 12 Australian Ybk Int’l L82.Google Scholar

Sinclair, I, The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 2nd edn (Manchester University Press 1984).Google Scholar

Sluiter, G, ‘Human Rights Protection in the ICC Pre-Trial Phase’ in Stahn, C and Sluiter, G (eds.), The Emerging Practice of the International Criminal Court (Brill 2009) 459.Google Scholar

Sluiter, G, ‘Implementation of the ICC Statute in the Dutch Legal Order’ (2004) 2 J Int’l Crim Justice158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, ATH, ‘Judicial Law Making in the Criminal Law’ (1984) 100 LQ Rev46.Google Scholar

Special Working Group on the Crime of Aggression, Report (2009), ICC-ASP/7/20/Add.1, Annex II, Appendix I.

Stahn, C, ‘The Ambiguities of Security Council Resolution 1422 (2002)’ (2003) 14 EJIL85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stern, L, ‘Interpreting Legal Language at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia: Overcoming the Lack of Lexical Equivalents’ (2007) 2 J Specialised Translation63.Google Scholar

Sullivan, R, ‘The Plain Meaning Rule and Other Ways to Cheat at Statutory Interpretation’, , accessed 5 November 2013.

Sullivan, R, Sullivan and Driedger on the Construction of Statutes, 4th edn (Butterworths 2002).Google Scholar

Summers, RS, Form and Function in a Legal System: A General Study (Cambridge University Press 2006).Google Scholar

Summers, RS, ‘Statutory Interpretation in the United States’ in MacCormick, DN and Summers, RS (eds.), Interpreting Statutes: A Comparative Study (Ashgate 1991) 407.Google Scholar

Summers, RS, and Taruffo, M, ‘Interpretation and Comparative Analysis’ in MacCormick, DN and Summers, RS (eds.), Interpreting Statutes: A Comparative Study (Ashgate 1991) 461.Google Scholar

Sunga, LS, The Emerging System of International Criminal Law: Developments in Codification and Implementation (Kluwer Law International 1997).Google Scholar

Swart, B, ‘International Crimes: Present Situation and Future Development’ (2004) 19 Nouvelles études pénales201.Google Scholar

Swart, M, ‘Judicial Lawmaking at the Ad Hoc Tribunals: The Creative Use of the Sources of International Law and “Adventurous Interpretation”’ (2010) 70 ZaöRV459.Google Scholar

Szasz, C, ‘The Security Council Starts Legislating’ (2002) 96 AJIL901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Talmon, S, ‘The Security Council as World Legislator’ (2005) 99 AJIL175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Terris, D, Romano, CPR and Swigart, L, The International Judge – An Introduction to the Men and Women Who Decide the World’s Cases (Brandeis University Press 2007).Google Scholar

Thirlway, HWA, ‘Reflections on Lex Ferenda’ (2001) 32 Netherlands Ybk Int’l L3.Google Scholar

Thirlway, HWA, ‘The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice: 1960–1989 (Part Three)’ (1991) 62:1 British Ybk Int’l L1.Google Scholar

Thirlway, HWA, ‘The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice: 1960–1989 (Part Two)’ (1990) 61:1 British Ybk Int’l L1.Google Scholar

Thirlway, HWA, ‘The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice: 1960–1989 (Part One)’ (1989) 60:1 British Ybk Int’l L1.Google Scholar

Thirlway, HWA, International Customary Law and Codification (Sijthoff 1972).Google Scholar

Tobin, J, ‘Seeking to Persuade: A Constructive Approach to Human Rights Treaty Interpretation’ (2010) 23 Harvard HR J1.Google Scholar

Tomuschat, C, Human Rights: Between Idealism and Realism, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press 2008).Google Scholar

Trechsel, S, Human Rights in Criminal Proceedings (Oxford University Press 2005).Google Scholar

Triffterer, O, ‘Can the “Elements of Crimes” Narrow or Broaden Responsibility for Criminal Behaviour defined in the Rome Statute?’ in Stahn, C and Sluiter, G (eds.), The Emerging Practice of the International Criminal Court (Martinus Nijhoff 2009) 381.Google Scholar

Triffterer, O, ‘Article 10’ in Triffterer, O (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 2nd edn (CH Beck/Hart/Nomos 2008) 531.Google Scholar

Triffterer, O, ‘Command Responsibility, Article 28 Rome Statute, an Extension of Individual Criminal Responsibility for Crimes within the Jurisdiction of the Court – Compatible with Article 22, Nullum Crimen Sine Lege?’ in Triffterer, O (ed.), Gedächtnisschrift für Theo Vogler (CF Müller 2004) 213.Google Scholar

Triffterer, O, ‘The New International Criminal Law – its General Principles Establishing Individual Criminal Responsibility’ (2003) 32 Thesaurus Acroasium633.Google Scholar

Triffterer, O, ‘Article 10’ in Triffterer, O (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 1st edn (Beck/Hart/Nomos 1999) 315.Google Scholar

Tsagourias, N, ‘Security Council Legislation, Article 2(7) of the UN Charter, and the Principle of Subsidiarity’ (2004) 24:3 LJIL539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tsagourias, N, ‘Draft Statute for an International Criminal Court’ (1954) UN Doc. A/2645.

Tsagourias, N, ‘Draft Statute for an International Criminal Court’ (1950) UN Doc. A/2136.

Tsagourias, N, ‘Note on the Private Codification of Public International Law’ (1947) UN Doc. A/AC.10/25.

UNHRC, ‘General Comment No. 32’ (2007) UN Doc. CCPR/C/GC/32.

UNHRC, ‘General Comment No. 24’ (1994) UN Doc. CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.6.

UNHRC, ‘General Comment No. 20’ (1992) UN Doc. HRI/GEN/1/Rev.6, 151 (2003).

UNHRC, ‘General Comment No. 7’ (1982) UN Doc. HRI/GEN/1/Rev.6, 129 (2003).

UNSC, ‘Security Council Requests One-Year Extension of UN Peacekeeper Immunity from International Criminal Court’ (12 June 2003) Press Release SC/7789.

UNSC, ‘Report of the Secretary-General on the Establishment of a Special Court for Sierra Leone’ (2000) UN Doc. S/2000/915.

UNSC, ‘Comprehensive Report of the Secretary-General on Practical Arrangements for the Effective Functioning of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, Recommending Arusha as the Seat of the Tribunal’ (1995) UN Doc. S/1995/134.

UNSC, ‘Report of the Secretary-General Pursuant to Paragraph 5 of Security Council Resolution 955’ (1994) UN Doc. S/1995/134.

UNSC, ‘Report of the Secretary-General Pursuant to Paragraph 2 of Security Council Resolution 808’ (1993) UN Doc. S/25704.

Van Damme, I, ‘Treaty Interpretation by the WTO Appellate Body’ (2010) 21:3 EJIL605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Damme, I, Treaty Interpretation by the WTO Appellate Body (Oxford University Press 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Schaack, B, ‘Legality and International Criminal Law’ (2009) 103 ASIL Proceedings2.Google Scholar

Van Schaack, B, ‘Crimen Sine Lege: Judicial Lawmaking at the Intersection of Law and Morals’ (2008) 97 Georgetown LJ119.Google Scholar

Verhoeven, J, ‘Article 21 of the Rome Statute and the Ambiguities of Applicable Law’ (2002) 33 Netherlands Ybk Int’l L3.Google Scholar

Villalpando, S, ‘The Legal Dimension of the International Community: How Community Interests are Protected in International Law’ (2010) 21:2 EJIL387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Villiger, ME, ‘The Rules on Interpretation: Misgivings, Misunderstandings, Miscarriage? The ‘Crucible’ Intended by the International Law Commission’ in Cannizzaro, E (ed.), The Law of Treaties Beyond the Vienna Convention (Oxford University Press 2011) 105.Google Scholar

Villiger, ME, Commentary on the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (Martinus Nijhoff 2009).Google Scholar

Villiger, ME, Customary International Law and Treaties (Kluwer Law International 1997).Google Scholar

Villiger, ME, Customary International Law and Treaties (Martinus Nijhoff 1985).Google Scholar

Virally, M, ‘The Sources of International Law’ in Sørensen, M (ed.), Manual of Public International Law (MacMillan 1968) 116.Google Scholar

Vité, S, ‘The Interrelation of the Law of Occupation and Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: The Examples of Food, Health and Property’ (2008) 90:871 Int’l Rev of the Committee of the Red Cross629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vӧneky, S, ‘Analogy in International Law’ in Wolfrum, R. (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (2008-), online edition, , accessed 4 July 2014.

Voigt, C, ‘The Role of General Principles of International Law and their Relationship to Treaty Law’ (2008) 2:121 (38) Retfærd Årgang3.Google Scholar

von Bogdandy, A and Venzke, I, ‘Beyond Dispute: International Judicial Institutions as Lawmakers’ (2011) 12 German LJ979.Google Scholar

von Feuerbach, PJA Ritter, ‘The General Principles of International Criminal Law: The Foundations of Criminal Law and the Nullum Crimen Principle’ in Lehrbuch des gemeinen in Deutschland gültigen peinlichen Rechts, 11th edn (Heyer 1832) 12–19, translation by IL Fraser in (2007) 5 J Int’l Crim Justice 1005.Google Scholar

von Hebel, H, ‘The Decision to Include Elements of Crimes in the Rome Statute’ in Lee, RS and Others (eds.), The International Criminal Court: Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence (Transnational 2001) 3.Google Scholar

von Hebel, H, and Robinson, D, ‘Crimes within the Jurisdiction of the Court’ in Lee, RS and Others (eds.), The International Criminal Court: The Making of the Rome Statute (Kluwer Law International 1999) 79.Google Scholar

von Liszt, F, ‘The Rationale for the Nullum Crimen Principle’ (2007) 5 J Int’l Crim Justice1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waldock, H, ‘Sixth Report on the Law of Treaties’ (1966) II Ybk of the ILC51.Google Scholar

Waldock, H, ‘Fourth Report on the Law of Treaties’ (1965) II Ybk of the ILC49.Google Scholar

Waldock, H, ‘Third Report on the Law of Treaties’ (1964) II Ybk of the ILC5.Google Scholar

Wald, PM, Interview for The Third Branch (2002), , accessed 21 April 2010.

Waldron, J, ‘The Concept and the Rule of Law’, Paper read at the NYU Colloquium in Legal, Political and Social Theory (14 September 2006) (on file with author).

Weigend, T, ‘“In General a Principle of Justice” – The Debate on the ‘Crime against Peace’ in the Wake of the Nuremberg Judgment’ (2012) 10 J Int’l Crim Justice41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weigend, T, ‘Intent, Mistake of Law and Co-perpetration in the Lubanga Decision on Confirmation of Charges’ (2008) 6 J Int’l Crim Justice471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weil, P, ‘Towards Relative Normativity in International Law?’ (1983) 77 AJIL413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Werle, G, Principles of International Criminal Law (TMC Asser Press 2005).Google Scholar

Werle, G, and Jessberger, F, ‘Unless Otherwise Provided: Article 30 of the ICC Statute and the Mental Element of Crimes under International Criminal Law’ (2005) 3 J Int’l Crim Justice35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wessel, J, ‘Judicial Policy-Making at the International Criminal Court: An Institutional Guide to Analyzing International Adjudication’ (2006) 44 Columbia J Transnat’l L377.Google Scholar

White, N, and Cryer, R, ‘The ICC and the Security Council: An Uncomfortable Relationship’ in Doria, J, Gasser, H-P and Bassiouni, MC (eds.), The Legal Regime of the International Criminal Court: Essays in Honour of Professor Igor Blishchenko (Martinus Nijhoff 2009) 455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wise, EM, ‘General Rules of Criminal Law’ (1997) 25 Denv J Int’l L & Pol’y313.Google Scholar

Wolfke, K, ‘Can Codification of International Law be Harmful?’ in Makarczyk, J (ed.), Essays in International Law in Honour of Judge Manfred Lachs (Martinus Nijhoff 1984) 313.Google Scholar

Wouters, J and Odermatt, J, ‘Quis Custodiet Consilium Securitatis? Reflections on the Lawmaking Powers of the Security Council’, Working Paper No. 109, Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies (June 2013), , accessed 3 July 2014.

Young, R, ‘“Internationally Recognized Human Rights” before the International Criminal Court’ (January 2011) 60 Int’l Crim LQ189.Google Scholar

Zacklin, R, ‘Some Major Problems in the Drafting of the ICTY Statute’ (2004) 2 J Int’l Crim Justice361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zahar, A, and Sluiter, G, International Criminal Law (Oxford University Press 2008).Google Scholar

Zimmermann, A, ‘Article 5’ in Triffterer, O (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 2nd edn (CH Beck/Hart/Nomos 2008) 129.Google Scholar

Zimmermann, A, ‘Article 8’ in Triffterer, O (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 2nd edn (CH Beck/Hart/Nomos 2008) 275.Google Scholar

Zimmermann, A, ‘Article 124’ in Triffterer, O (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 2nd edn (CH Beck/Hart/Nomos 2008) 1767.Google Scholar

Zimmermann, A, ‘Israel and the International Criminal Court – an Outsider’s Perspective’ (2006) 36 Israel Ybk of Human Rights231.Google Scholar