CasesArgentinaCamara Nacional de Apelaciones en lo Comercial [Second Instance Court of Appeal], Division E, 45.626, Oct. 14, 1993, (Art. 19)
Inta S.A. v. MCS Officina Meccanica S.p.A, Camara Nacional en lo Comercial, Sala E, 45626, 14.10.1993 (Art. 18)
Quilmes Combustibles v. Vigan S.A., Juzgado Nacional de Primera Instancia en lo Comercial No. 18, Oct. 20, 1989, (Art. 11)
AustriaInternationales Schiedsgericht der Bundeskammer der gewerblichen Wirtschaft [Austrian Int'l chamber of Commerce Arbitral Body, Vienna] SCH-4318, Jun. 15, 1994, (Art. 14)
Oberster Gerichtshof, 6 Ob 311/99z, Mar. 9, 2000, (Art. 19)
Oberster, Gerichtshof, 1 Ob 74/99 K, Jun. 29, 1999, (Art. 29)
Oberster Gerichtshof, 2 Ob 58/97m, Mar. 20, 1997, (Arts. 14, 19)
Oberster Gerichtshof, 3 Ob 512/96, Jun. 18, 1997, (Art. 14, 18)
Oberster Gerichtshof, 10 Ob 518/95 (1996) (Art. 11)
Oberster Gerichtshof, 10 Ob 518/95, Feb. 6, 1996, (Arts. 14, 18)
Oberster Gerichtshof [Supreme Court][OGH], 10 Ob 518/95 (1996) (Art. 12)
Oberster Gerichtshof, Ob 547/93, Nov. 10, 1994, (Art. 14)
Oberster Gerichtshof, 1 Ob 525–93, Jul. 2, 1993, (Art. 13)
AustraliaRoder Zelt- und Hallenkonstruktionen GmbH v. Rosedown Park Pty Ltd. and Another, Federal Court (South Australia District Adelaide), 57 FCR 216, Apr. 28, 1995, (Art. 23)
BelgiumM v. N.V.M., Rechtbank van Koophandel, Hasselt, Dec. 2, 1998, (Art. 18)
Rechtbank van Koophandel (Commercial Court), Mechelen, Jan. 18, 2002, (Art. 18)
S.A. Gantry v. Research Consulting Marketing, Tribunal Commercial de Nivelles, R.G. 1707/93, Sept. 19 1995, (Art. 19)
Vital Berry Marketing NV v. Dira-Frost NV, Rechtbank van Koophandel, Hasselt, AR 1849/94 (1995) (Arts. 12, 29)
FinlandHelsingin Hoviokeus [Helsinki Court of Appeals][HO] S00/82 (2000) (Art. 11)
FranceCour d'Appel de Colmar, Jun. 12, 2001, (Art. 14)
Cour d'Appel de Grenoble, 93/1613, Apr. 26, 1995, (Art. 14)
Cour d'Appel de Grenoble- Chambre Comercial, Nov. 28, 2002, (Art. 11)
Cour d'Appel de Paris, 2002/02304, Sept. 10, 2003, (Arts. 14, 18)
Fauba v. Fujitisu Microelectronik, Cour d'Appel de Paris, 92-16.993, Apr. 22, 1992, (Art. 19)
Fauba v. Fujitisu Microelectronik, Cour de Cassation, Paris, 92-16.993, Apr. 22, 1992, (Art. 14)
Hughes v. Societe Technocontact, Cour de Cassation [Supreme Court] [CASS.], B 95-19.448, 180 P, Jan. 27, 1998, (Art. 18)
ISEA Industrie S.p.A and Compagnie d' assurances GENERALI v. LU S.A. and Beil S.A., Cour d' Appel de Paris, 95-018179, Dec. 13, 1995, (Art. 18)
Les Verreries de Saint-Gobain SA v. Martinswerk GmbH, Cour de Cassation, 1309 P, Jul. 16, 1998, (Art. 19)
Ste Calzados Magnanni v. Sarl Shoes General Int'l, CA 96J/00101, Oct. 21, 1999, (Art. 18)
Societe Camara Agraria Provincial de Guipuzcoa v. Andre Margaron, Cour d' Appel de Grenoble, 93/2821, Mar. 29, 1995, (Art. 29)
Ste Fauba France FIDIS GC Electronique v. Ste Fujitisu Mikroeletronik GmbH, Cour de Cassation, Jan. 4, 1995, (Arts. 14, 19)
GermanyAmtsgericht Kehl, 3 C 925/93, Oct. 6, 1995, (Art. 19)
Amtsgericht Kehl, 3 C 925/93, Oct. 6, 1995, (Art. 24)
Bundesgerichtshof, VIII ZR 60/01, Oct. 31, 2001, (Art. 18)
Bundesgerichtshof, VIII ZR 304/00, Jan. 9, 2002, (Art. 19)
Landergericht Bochum, Jan. 24, 1996, (Art. 24)
Landergericht Frankfurt am Main, 2/1 O 7/94, Jul. 6, 1994, (Art. 18)
Landgericht Baden-Baden, 4 O 113/90, Aug. 14, 1991, (Art. 19)
Landgericht Hamburg, 5 O 543/88, Sept. 26, 1990, (Art. 23)
Landgericht Heilbronn, 3 KFH O 653/93, Sept. 15, 1997, (Art. 24)
Landgericht Memmingen, 2 H O 1434/92 (1993) (Art. 11)
Landgericht Munchen, 8 HKO 24667/93, Feb. 8, 1995, (Art. 14)
Landgericht Oldenburg 12 O 2943/94, Feb. 28, 1996, (Art. 14)
Oberlandesgericht Dusseldorf, 17 U 136/92, Mar. 12, 1993, (Art. 29)
Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt 9 U 13/00, Aug. 30, 2000, (Art. 14)
Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt am Main, 10 U 80/93, Mar. 4, 1994, (Art. 19)
Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt am Main, 25 U 185/94, Mar. 31, 1995, (Art. 19)
Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt am Main, 5 U 209/94, May 23, 1995, (Art. 18)
Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt am Main, 5 U 209/94, May 23, 1995, (Art. 19)
Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt am Main, 9 U 81/94, Jul. 5, 1995, (Art. 18)
Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt/M 10 U 80/93, Mar. 4, 1994, (Art. 14)
Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt, 9 U 13/00, Aug. 30, 2000, (Art. 18)
Oberlandesgericht Hamburg, 1 U 143/95 and 410 O 21/95, July 4, 1997, (Art. 14)
Oberlandesgericht Hamm, 11 U 206/93, Feb. 8, 1995, (Art. 24)
Oberlandesgericht Hamm, 19 U 97/91, Sept. 22, 1992, (Art. 19)
Oberlandesgericht Koln, 22 U 202/93 Feb. 22, 1994, (Art. 29)
Oberlandesgericht Koln, Provincial Court of Appeal, 22 U 202/93, Feb. 22, 1994, (Art. 18)
Oberlandesgericht Naumburg, 9 U 146/98, Apr. 27, 1999, (Art. 19)
Oberlandesgericht Saarbrucken, 1 U 69/92, Jan. 13, 1993, (Art. 18)
Oberlandesgericht Stuttgart, 5. Zivilsenat, 5 U 118/99, Feb. 28, 2000, (Art. 14)
Oberlandesgericht Stuttgart, 5. Zivilsenat, 5 U 118/99, Feb. 28, 2000, (Art. 18)
Oberlandesgericht, Provincial Court of Appeal, 7 U 5460/94 (1995) (Art. 11)
R. Motor s.n.c. v. M. Auto Vertriebs GmbH, Oberlandesgericht Munchen, 7 U 1720/94, Feb. 8, 1995, (Art. 19)
R. Motor s.n.c. v. M. Auto Vertriebs GmbH, Oberlandesgericht Munchen, 7 U 1720/94, Feb. 8, 1995, (Art. 29)
V. Russian German joint venture v. Fa. Va. Gesellschaft fur Wirtschaftskooperation mbH, Oberlandesgericht Munchen, 7 U 5460/94 (1995) (Art. 11)
V. Russian German joint venture v. Fa. Va. Gesellschaft fur Wirtschaftskooperation mbH, Oberlandesgericht Munchen, 7 U 5460/94, Mar. 8, 1995, (Art. 23)
HungaryFovarosi Birosag, Metropolitan Court, 12.G.41.471/1991/21 (1992) (Art. 12)
Legfelsobb Birosag, Gf.I. 31 349/1992/9, Jan. 10, 1992, (Art. 14)
MALEV Hungarian Airlines v. United Technologies International Inc. Pratt & Whitney Commercial Engine Business, Supreme Court of the Republic of Hungary, Gf.I.31 349/1992/9, Sept. 25, 1992, (Arts. 14, 19)
Metropolitan Court of Budapest, AZ 12.G.41.471/1991 (1992) (Art. 11)
Metropolitan Court of Budapest, AZ 12.G.41.471/1999, Mar. 24, 1992, (Art. 14)
International Chamber of CommerceICC Court of Arbitration- Paris 8324/1995 (1995) (Art. 14)
ICC Court of Arbitration- Paris, Case No. 7844/1994 (Art. 18)
ICC Court of Arbitration- Milan, Case No. 8908, Dec., 1998 (Art. 19)
ICC Court of Arbitration- Paris, Case No. 7844/1994 (Art. 21)
International Court of Arbitration, Case No. 7331 (1994) (Art. 29)
International Court of Arbitration, Case No. 9474, Feb., 1999 (Art. 29)
International Court of Arbitration- Zurich Arbitral Awards, Case No. 9117, Mar., 1998 (Art. 29)
MexicoConservas, Costena, S.A. (Jul. 16, 1996) (Mex.) translated in 17 J.L. & Com.427 (1998) (Art. 12)
Conservas la Costena S.A. de C.V. v. Lanis S.A. & Agro-industrial Santa Adela S.A., COMPROMEX, Comision para la Proteccion del Comercio Exterior de Mexico, M/21/95, Apr. 29, 1996, (Art. 23)
Jose Luis Morales y/o Son Export, S.A. de C.V., de Hermosillo Sonora, Mexico v. Nez Marketing de Los Angeles California, E.U.A., COMPROMEX, Comision para le Proteccion del Comercio Exterior de Mexico, M/66/92, May 4, 1993, (Art. 11)
NetherlandsHandelskwekerij G. Aartsen BV v. G. Suykens, Arrondissementsrechtbank Zutphen, 1242 HAZA 95-934, May 29, 1997, (Art. 19)
Hof' S-Hertogenbosch, Oct. 16, 2002, (Art. 18)
Hoge Raad, Supreme Court, 16.436, Nov. 7, 1997, (Art. 12)
ICT GmbH v. Princen Automatisiering Oss BV, Gerechtshof's Hertogenbosch, 770/95/HE, Nov. 19, 1996, (Art. 19)
J. T. Schuermans v. Boomsma Distilleerderij / Wijnkoperi BV, Hoge Raad, 16.436, (1997) (Art. 11)
Rechtbank Rotterdam, HA ZA 98-1405, Oct. 14, 1999, (Art. 18)
Tuzzi Trend Tex Fashion GmbH v. W. J. M. Keijzer-Somers, Arrondissementsrechtbank Amsterdam, H 93.2900, Oct. 5, 1994, (Art. 24)
People's Republic of ChinaChina International Economic Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC), 75, Apr. 1, 1993, (Art. 19)
Russian FederationHigh Court of Arbitration of the Russian Federation, 29, Feb. 16, 1998, (Art. 11)
High Court of Arbitration of the Russian Federation, 29, Feb. 16, 1998, (Art. 12)
Tribunal of Int'l Commercial Arbitration at the Russian Federation of Chamber of Commerce 309/1993, Mar. 3, 1995, (Art. 14)
Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda RF, Highest Court of Arbitration, Information Letter 29, Feb. 16, 1998, (Art. 29)
Vestn. Vyssh. Arb. Suda RF, Res. No. 4670/96, Mar. 25, 1997, (Art. 29)
SpainNordgemuse Wilhelm Krogmann, OHG v. Javier Virto, S.A., Tribunal Supremo, Jun. 26, 1998, (Art. 18)
Sociedad Cooperativa Epis-Centre v. La Palentina, S.A., Tribunal Supremo, Feb. 17, 1998, (Art. 11)
Sociedad Cooperativa Epis-Centre v. La Palentina, S.A., Tribunal Supremo, 2977/1996, Feb. 17, 1998, (Arts. 18, 19)
SwitzerlandBerzirkgerict St. Gallen, District Court, 3PZ 97/18 Jul. 3, 1997, (Art. 14)
Berzirkgerict St. Gallen, SZ 84–5, Jul. 3, 1997, (Art. 14)
Handelsgericht Aargau, OR.960-0013, Sept. 26, 1997, (Art. 14)
Handelsgericht des Kantons Zurich, HG 940513, July 10, 1996, (Art. 18)
Handelsgericht des Kantons Zurich, HG 940513, Jul. 10, 1996, (Art. 19)
Handelsgericht St. Gallen, HG 45/1994, Dec. 5, 1994, (Art. 14)
Handelsgericht Zurich, HG 930634, Nov. 30, 1998, (Art. 29)
HG St. Gallen, HG 45/1994 (1995) (Art. 11)
Obergericht des Kantons Thurgau, ZB 95.22, Dec. 19, 1995, (Art. 14)
Schweizerisches Bundesgericht, 4C.105/2000 (2000) (Art. 11)
W.T. GmbH v. P, Zivilgericht, Basel Civil Court, ZG, P4 1998/238, Dec. 21, 1992, (Art. 18)
United StatesAlta-Medine v. Crompton Corp., 00 CIV. 5901 (HB), 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18107, at *15 & n. 6 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 7, 2001) (Art. 11)
Beijing Metals & Minerals Import/Export Corp. v. Am. Bus. Ctr., Inc., 993 F.2d 1178 (5th Cir. 1993) (Art. 11)
Chateau des Charmes Wines Ltd. v. Sabate USA Inc., 328 F.3d 528. (9th Cir. 2003) (Arts. 11, 14, 18, 19, 29)
Claudia v. Olivieri Footwear Ltd., No. 96 CIV. 8052 (HB) (THK) 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4586, at *18 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 6, 1998) (Art. 11)
Fercus v. Palazzo, No. 98 CIV. 77228 (NRB), 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11086, at *11–12 (S.D.N. Y. Aug. 8, 2000) (Art. 11)
Filanto v. Chilewich Int'l Corp., 789 F. Supp. 1229 (S.D.N.Y. 1992) (Art. 11, 18, 19)
Geneva Pharm. Tech. Corp v. Barr Lab., Inc. 201 F. Supp. 2d 236 (S.D.N.Y. 2002) (Art. 11, 14, 16, 18, 29)
GPL Treatment v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp., 894 P.2d 470 (Ct. App. 1995) (Art. 11)
Graves Import Co. v. Chilewich Int'l Corp., 92 CIV. 3655 (JFK), 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13393, at *13 n.2 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 22, 1994) (Art. 29)
Helen Kaminski Pty. Ltd. v. Marketing Australian Prods., 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10630, at *2–3 (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 23, 1997) (Art. 14)
Magellan International Corporation v. Salzgitter Handel GMBH, No. 99 Civ. 5153, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19386 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 7, 1999) (Art. 14, 18, 19)
MCC Marble Ceramic Center, Inc. v. Ceramica Nuova D'Agostino, S.p.A., 144 F.3d 1384 (11th Cir. 1998) (Arts. 11, 29)
Mitchell Aircraft Spares, Inc. v. European Aircraft Service AB, 23 F. Supp 2d. 915 (N.D. Ill. 1998) (Art. 11)
Prime Wood Inc. v. Roxan GmbH & Co. Veredelungen, No. A3-97-28, 1998 U.S. Dist. WL 1777501, at *3 (D.N.D. Feb. 19, 1998) (Art. 19)
Shuttle Packaging Sys. v. Jacob Tsonkais, INA, S.A., No. 1:01-CV-691, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21630, at *22 (W. D. Mich. Dec. 17, 2001) (Art. 11, 29)
Viva Vano Import Corp. v. Farnese Vini S.r.l., No. 99-CIV.-6384, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12347 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 29, 2000) (Art. 14)
VietnamCong ty Ng Nam Bee v. cong ty Thuong mai Tay Ninh, People's Supreme Court, Appeal Division in Ho Chi Minh City, 74/VPPT, Apr. 5, 1996, (Art. 29)