Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of abbreviations
- Table of Cases
- Introduction
- 1 International human rights law and notions of human rights: foundations, achievements and challenges
- 2 International human rights law: the normative framework
- 3 Human rights in practice
- 4 The United Nations Charter system
- 5 The UN human rights treaty system
- 6 Regional human rights treaty systems
- 7 Individual complaints procedures
- 8 Civil and political rights
- 9 Economic, social and cultural rights
- 10 Group rights: self-determination, minorities and indigenous peoples
- 11 The human rights of women
- 12 The right to development, poverty and related rights
- 13 Victims’ rights and reparation
- 14 The application of human rights in armed conflict and the international criminalisation process
- 15 Human rights and counter-terrorism
- 16 Non-state actors and human rights
- 17 Globalisation and its impact on human rights
- Index
- References
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core
13 - Victims’ rights and reparation
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of abbreviations
- Table of Cases
- Introduction
- 1 International human rights law and notions of human rights: foundations, achievements and challenges
- 2 International human rights law: the normative framework
- 3 Human rights in practice
- 4 The United Nations Charter system
- 5 The UN human rights treaty system
- 6 Regional human rights treaty systems
- 7 Individual complaints procedures
- 8 Civil and political rights
- 9 Economic, social and cultural rights
- 10 Group rights: self-determination, minorities and indigenous peoples
- 11 The human rights of women
- 12 The right to development, poverty and related rights
- 13 Victims’ rights and reparation
- 14 The application of human rights in armed conflict and the international criminalisation process
- 15 Human rights and counter-terrorism
- 16 Non-state actors and human rights
- 17 Globalisation and its impact on human rights
- Index
- References
Summary
Introduction
International human rights law has for a long time focused primarily on standard-setting and the establishment of institutions tasked with promoting human rights and monitoring states’ compliance with their obligations. Limited attention was paid to victims as rights-holders and to the availability of effective remedies for the vindication of rights. Yet, slowly, conceptual shifts and practices, beginning at the national level, changed prevailing perceptions of victims as largely passive beneficiaries, resulting in growing calls for victims to play a more active role, particularly in the criminal justice process. The exclusion of victims and their lack of opportunity to participate effectively in proceedings that affect their rights were increasingly seen as an anomaly, raising the fundamental question of whose interests a justice system is supposed to serve. This is reflected in the work of scholars and practitioners in the field of victimology and renewed interest in restorative justice.
This change in thinking gained international currency initially with the 1984 UNGA Declaration of Basic Principles of Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power (hereinafter Victims’ Declaration) and more than twenty years later culminated in the Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law (hereinafter Basic Principles). The impetus for victims’ rights owes a lot to the increasing availability of regional and international complaints procedures. The growing recourse to these procedures has enabled, if not compelled, regional and international human rights treaty bodies to develop their jurisprudence and, to varying degrees, strengthen victims’ rights in the process. More recently, the establishment of international(ised) criminal tribunals, in particular the ICC, has led to a keener appreciation of victims’ rights, including the right to protection and the right to participation.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- International Human Rights Law and Practice , pp. 522 - 566Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2013
References
, ‘An Emerging Mandate for International Courts: Victim-Centered Remedies and Restorative Justice’, Stan. J. Int’l L.
47(2) (2011), 279–332.Google Scholar
et al. (eds.), Out of the Ashes: Reparations for Gross Violations of Human Rights (Antwerp, Oxford: Intersentia, 2006).
. (ed.), The Handbook of Reparations (Oxford University Press, 2006).
, Victims’ Rights, Human Rights and Criminal Justice: Reconceiving the Role of Third Parties (Oxford: Hart, 2008).
and (eds.), Repairing the Past? International Perspectives on Reparations for Gross Human Rights Abuses (Antwerp, Oxford: Intersentia, 2007).
, The Right to Reparation in International Law for Victims of Armed Conflict (Cambridge University Press, 2012).
, and (eds.), Reparations for Victims of Genocide, War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity: Systems in Place and Systems in the Making (Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 2009).
(ed.), Reparations for Indigenous Peoples: International and Comparative Perspectives (Oxford University Press, 2009).
and (eds.), Reparation in Instances of Grave Violations of Human Rights (The Hague, Boston, London: Kluwer Law International, 1999).
, Remedies in International Human Rights Law, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 2005).
, ‘Victims’ reparations claims and international criminal courts: incompatible values’, JICJ
8(1) (2010), 79–111.Google Scholar
, Victims’ Rights, Human Rights and Criminal Justice, Reconceiving the Role of Third Parties (Oxford: Hart, 2008), 7–11
, Restorative Justice: Ideas, Values and Debates (Uffculme, Devon: Willan, 2002)
Factory at Chorzów, Claim for Indemnity, Jurisdiction (1927)
, Remedies in International Human Rights Law, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 2005), 22–30
, ‘Justice and Reparations’, in de Greiff (ed.), The Handbook of Reparations (Oxford University Press, 2006), 451–77
, and (eds.), Reparations for Victims of Genocide, War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity (Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 2009)
Judicial Guarantees in States of Emergency (Arts. 27(2), 25 and 8 American Convention on Human Rights), OC-9/87 (6 October 1981)
, Human Rights: Between Idealism and Realism, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 2008), 358–72
Nature of the General Legal Obligation Imposed on States Parties to the Covenant, UN Doc. CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.13 (26 May 2004)
, ‘Reparation by the Human Rights Chamber for Bosnia and Herzegovina’, in et al. (eds.), Out of the Ashes: Reparations for Gross Violations of Human Rights (Antwerp, Oxford: Intersentia, 2006), 245–88
Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Advisory opinion of 9 July 2004
Decision on victims’ participation (Case of the Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo) ICC 01/04–0/06–1119 (18 January 2008)
, ‘Do Victims of Torture and Other Serious Human Rights Violations have an Independent and Enforceable Right to Reparation?’, IJHR
16(5) (2012), 717–36Google Scholar
, ‘The New Programs for Payments to Victims of National Socialist Injustice’, German Yearbook of International Law (GYBIL) 44 (2001), at 307–52Google Scholar
Cyprus v. Turkey, (2002)
case concerning Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda) Judgment 2005
Nilabati Behera alias Lalita Behera v. State of Orissa and Others, (1993)
, The Right to Reparation in International Law for Victims of Armed Conflict (Cambridge University Press, 2012)
, ‘International Human Rights Tort Claims and the Experience of United States Courts: an Introduction to the US Case Law, Key Statutes and Doctrines’, in (ed.), Torture as Tort: Comparative Perspectives on the Development of Transnational Tort Litigation (Oxford: Hart, 2001), 65–107
, ‘Can Victims Sue State Officials for Torture? Reflections on Rasul v. Myers from the Perspective of International Law’, JICJ
6(2) (2008), 347–69Google Scholar
Draft General Comment on the obligation of States Parties to implement article 14, Working Document presented at its Forty-sixth session (9 May–3 June 2011)
, Distomo Massacre case, BGH-III ZR 245/98 (26 June 2003)
and , ‘Is there a Substantive Right to Compensation for Individual Victims of Armed Conflict against a State under International Law?’, GYBIL
49 (2006), 367–412Google Scholar
, ‘Remedies for Victims of Violations of International Humanitarian Law’, IRRC 851 (2003), 497–526Google Scholar
, ‘Draft Declaration of International Law Principles on Compensation for Victims of War (Substantive Issues)’, in International Law Association, Compensation for Victims of War (Rio de Janeiro Conference, 2008), 2–20
Report of the International Commission of Inquiry on Darfur to the United Nations Secretary-General pursuant to Security Council resolution 1564 of 18 September 2004 (Geneva: United Nations, 25 January 2005)
, ‘The Reparation Regime of the International Criminal Court: Practical Considerations’, LJIL
15 (2002), 667–86Google Scholar
and , ‘Reparations before the International Criminal Court: the Early Jurisprudence on Victim Participation and its Impact on Future Reparation Proceedings’, in Ferstman, above note 10, 313–50, and REDRESS, Justice for Victims: The ICC’s Reparation Mandate (London: REDRESS, 2012)
Velásquez Rodríguez v. Honduras, Merits, Judgment of 29 July 1988
, Colonial Genocide and Reparations Claims in the 21st Century: The Socio-Legal Context of Claims under International Law by the Herero against Germany for Genocide in Namibia, 1904–1908 (Westport, CT: Greenwood, 2009)
, ‘Mau Mau Veterans Launch Second Round of Legal Action’, The Guardian (16 July 2012)
and , ‘The Issue of Reparation for Slavery and Colonialism and the Durban World Conference against Racism’, HRLJ
22(9/12) (2001), 341–50Google Scholar
and (eds.), Repairing the Past? International Perspectives on Reparations for Gross Human Rights Abuses (Antwerp, Oxford: Intersentia, 2007), 147–77
, Rule-of-law Tools for Post Conflict States: Reparations Programmes (New York, Geneva: United Nations, 2008), 34–6
REDRESS, Waiting for Justice: The Politics of Delays in the Administration of Justice in Torture Cases: Practice, Standards and Responses (London: REDRESS, 2008)
Report of the Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, UN Doc. A/HRC/7/3 (15 January 2008)
, Reparation for Torture: A Survey of Law and Practice in Thirty Selected Countries (London: REDRESS, 2003), 47–8
Assanidze v. Georgia, (2004)
Submission to the Human Rights Committee on Implementation of its Views in the Philippines (London: REDRESS, December 2011)
, ‘Remedial Approaches to Human Rights Violations: the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and Beyond’, Colum. J. Transnat’l L. 46 (2008), 351–419Google Scholar
McCann v. United Kingdom, 21 (1996)
, European Convention on the Compensation of Victims of Violent Crimes, opened for signature by Member States of the Council of Europe on 24 November 1983
Plan de Sánchez Massacre v. Guatemala, Reparations and costs, Judgment of 19 November 2004
and (eds.), International Mass Claims Processes: Legal and Practical Processes (Oxford University Press, 2007)
and , ‘Reevaluating Regional Human Rights Litigation in the Twenty-First Century: the Case of the Inter-American Court’, AJIL
102 (2008), 768–827Google Scholar
Updated Set of Principles for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights through action to combat Impunity, UN Commission on Human Rights Resolution 2005/81 (21 April 2005)
The Social and Economic Rights Action Centre and the Centre for Social and Economic Rights v. Nigeria, 155/96 (2001)
, ‘NGOs and the victims industry’, Le Monde Diplomatique, English edition (November 2008)
, ‘Reparations, Decisions and Dilemmas’, Hastings Int’l & Comp. L. Rev. 27 (2004), 157–219Google Scholar
and , International Human Rights Lexicon (Oxford University Press, 2005), 404–5
, Human Rights: A Political and Cultural Critique (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2002), 27–39
Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967, John Dugard, UN Doc. A/HRC/4/17 (29 January 2007)
and , Rights-based Approach to Development: Lessons from the Right to Food Movement in India, WIDER Research Paper (January 2007)
, Torture: Stories of Survival (London: REDRESS, 2005)
, Torture Survivors’ Perceptions of Reparation: Preliminary Survey (London: REDRESS, 2001)