Sekhar, LN, Natarajan, SK, Ellenbogen, RG, Ghodke, B. Cerebral revascularization for ischemia, aneurysms, and cranial base tumors. Neurosurgery. 2008;62(6 Suppl 3):1373–408; discussion 408–10.Google Scholar

Walker, M, Acharya, J, Bird, CR, Partovi, S. Evaluation of EC-IC bypass grafts using CT angiography. Barrow Quarterly. 2001;17(3).Google Scholar

Mohit, AA, Sekhar, LN, Natarajan, SK, Britz, GW, Ghodke, B. High-flow bypass grafts in the management of complex intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2007;60(2 Suppl 1):ONS105–22; discussion ONS22–3.Google Scholar

Wessels, L, Hecht, N, Vajkoczy, P. Bypass in neurosurgery-indications and techniques. Neurosurg Rev. 2019;42(2):389–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tayebi Meybodi, A, Huang, W, Benet, A, Kola, O, Lawton, MT. Bypass surgery for complex middle cerebral artery aneurysms: an algorithmic approach to revascularization. J Neurosurg. 2017;127(3):463–79.Google Scholar

Ramanathan, D, Temkin, N, Kim, LJ, Ghodke, B, Sekhar, LN. Cerebral bypasses for complex aneurysms and tumors: long-term results and graft management strategies. Neurosurgery. 2012;70(6):1442–57; discussion 57.Google Scholar

Group EIBS. Failure of extracranial-intracranial arterial bypass to reduce the risk of ischemic stroke. Results of an international randomized trial.New England Journal of Medicine. 1985;313(19):1191–200.Google Scholar

Grubb, RL Jr., Powers, WJ, Clarke, WR, Videen, TO, Adams, HP Jr., Derdeyn, CP, et al. Surgical results of the Carotid Occlusion Surgery Study. J Neurosurg. 2013;118(1):25–33.Google Scholar

Miyamoto, S, Yoshimoto, T, Hashimoto, N, Okada, Y, Tsuji, I, Tominaga, T, et al. Effects of extracranial-intracranial bypass for patients with hemorrhagic moyamoya disease: results of the Japan Adult Moyamoya Trial. Stroke. 2014;45(5):1415–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Esposito, G, Amin-Hanjani, S, Regli, L. Role of and Indications for Bypass Surgery After Carotid Occlusion Surgery Study (COSS)? Stroke. 2016;47(1):282–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ginat, DT, Smith, ER, Robertson, RL, Scott, RM, Schaefer, PW. Imaging after direct and indirect extracranial-intracranial bypass surgery. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201(1):W124–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Langner, S, Fleck, S, Seipel, R, Schroeder, HW, Hosten, N, Perfusion, Kirsch M. CT scanning and CT angiography in the evaluation of extracranial-intracranial bypass grafts. J Neurosurg. 2011;114(4):978–83.Google Scholar

Teng, MM, Jen, SL, Chiu, FY, Kao, YH, Lin, CJ, Chang, FC. Change in brain perfusion after extracranial-intracranial bypass surgery detected using the mean transit time of computed tomography perfusion. J Chin Med Assoc. 2012;75(12):649–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Low, SW, Teo, K, Lwin, S, Yeo, LL, Paliwal, PR, Ahmad, A, et al. Improvement in cerebral hemodynamic parameters and outcomes after superficial temporal artery-middle cerebral artery bypass in patients with severe stenoocclusive disease of the intracranial internal carotid or middle cerebral arteries. J Neurosurg. 2015;123(3):662–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Serrone, JC, Jimenez, L, Hanseman, DJ, Carroll, CP, Grossman, AW, Wang, L, et al. Changes in computed tomography perfusion parameters after superficial temporal artery to middle cerebral artery bypass: an analysis of 29 cases. Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B, Skull Base. 2014;75(6):371–7.Google ScholarPubMed

Kwon, WK, Kwon, TH, Park, DH, Kim, JH, Ha, SK. Efficacy of superficial temporal artery-middle cerebral artery bypass in cerebrovascular steno-occlusive diseases: Hemodynamics assessed by perfusion computed tomography. Asian Journal of Neurosurgery. 2017;12(3):519–24.Google Scholar

Vos, PC, Riordan, AJ, Smit, EJ, de Jong, HW, van der Zwan, A, Velthuis, BK, et al. Computed tomography perfusion evaluation after extracranial-intracranial bypass surgery. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery. 2015;136:139–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kotapka, MJ, Kalia, KK, Martinez, AJ, Sekhar, LN. Infiltration of the carotid artery by cavernous sinus meningioma. J Neurosurg. 1994;81(2):252–5.Google Scholar

Sekhar, LN, Bucur, SD, Bank, WO, Wright, DC. Venous and arterial bypass grafts for difficult tumors, aneurysms, and occlusive vascular lesions: evolution of surgical treatment and improved graft results. Neurosurgery. 1999;44(6):1207–23; discussion 23–4.Google ScholarPubMed

Natarajan, SK, Sekhar, LN, Schessel, D, Morita, A. Petroclival meningiomas: multimodality treatment and outcomes at long-term follow-up. Neurosurgery. 2007;60(6):965–79; discussion 79–81.Google Scholar

Sekhar, LN, Kalavakonda, C. Cerebral revascularization for aneurysms and tumors. Neurosurgery. 2002;50(2):321–31.Google Scholar

Sekhar, LN, Tzortzidis, FN, Bejjani, GK, Schessel, DA. Saphenous vein graft bypass of the sigmoid sinus and jugular bulb during the removal of glomus jugulare tumors. Report of two cases. J Neurosurg. 1997;86(6):1036–41.Google Scholar

Tzortzidis, F, Elahi, F, Wright, D, Natarajan, SK, Sekhar, LN. Patient outcome at long-term follow-up after aggressive microsurgical resection of cranial base chordomas. Neurosurgery. 2006;59(2):230–7; discussion 207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tzortzidis, F, Elahi, F, Wright, DC, Temkin, N, Natarajan, SK, Sekhar, LN. Patient outcome at long-term follow-up after aggressive microsurgical resection of cranial base chondrosarcomas. Neurosurgery. 2006;58(6):1090–8; discussion 1098.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kalavakonda, C, Sekhar, LN. Cerebral revascularization in cranial base tumors. Neurosurgery clinics of North America. 2001;12(3):557–74, viii–ix.Google Scholar

Akbarian-Tefaghi, H, Kalakoti, P, Sun, H, Sharma, K, Thakur, JD, Patra, DP, et al. Impact of hospital caseload and elective admission on outcomes after extracranial-intracranial bypass surgery. World Neurosurgery. 2017;108:716–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Yang, T, Tariq, F, Chabot, J, Madhok, R, Sekhar, LN. Cerebral revascularization for difficult skull base tumors: a contemporary series of 18 patients. World Neurosurgery. 2014;82(5):660–71.Google Scholar

McCracken, DJ, Higginbotham, RA, Boulter, JH, Liu, Y, Wells, JA, Halani, SH, et al. Degree of vascular encasement in sphenoid wing meningiomas predicts postoperative ischemic complications. Neurosurgery. 2017;80(6):957–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wolfe, SQ, Tummala, RP, Morcos, JJ. Cerebral revascularization in skull base tumors. Skull Base. 2005;15(1):71–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wolfswinkel, EM, Landau, MJ, Ravina, K, Kokot, NC, Russin, JJ, Carey, JN. EC-IC bypass for cerebral revascularization following skull base tumor resection: current practices and innovations. J Surg Oncol. 2018;118(5):815–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Di Maio, S, Ramanathan, D, Garcia-Lopez, R, Rocha, MH, Guerrero, FP, Ferreira, M Jr., et al. Evolution and future of skull base surgery: the paradigm of skull base meningiomas. World Neurosurgery. 2012;78(3–4):260–75.Google Scholar

Farsad, K, Hayek, RA, Mamourian, AC, Friedman, JA. Computerized tomographic angiography for preoperative assessment of the superficial temporal artery for external carotid artery to internal carotid artery bypass: Case illustration. Cases J. 2008;1(1):119.Google Scholar

Kramer, M, Vairaktaris, E, Nkenke, E, Schlegel, KA, Neukam, FW, Lell, M. Vascular mapping of head and neck: computed tomography angiography versus digital subtraction angiography. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2008;66(2):302–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bi, WL, Brown, PA, Abolfotoh, M, Al-Mefty, O, Mukundan, S Jr., Dunn, IF. Utility of dynamic computed tomography angiography in the preoperative evaluation of skull base tumors. J Neurosurg. 2015;123(1):1–8.Google Scholar

Matsumoto, M, Kodama, N, Endo, Y, Sakuma, J, Suzuki, K, Sasaki, T, et al. Dynamic 3D-CT Angiography. 2007;28(2):299–304.Google Scholar

Gupta, S, Bi, WL, Mukundan, S, Al-Mefty, O, Dunn, IF. Clinical applications of dynamic CT angiography for intracranial lesions. Acta Neurochirurgica. 2018;160(4):675–80.Google Scholar

Ramina, R, de Aguiar, PHP, Tatagiba, M. Samii’s Essentials in Neurosurgery. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sia, SF, Morgan, MK. High flow extracranial-to-intracranial brain bypass surgery. J Clin Neurosci. 2013;20(1):1–5.Google Scholar

Leech, PJ, Miller, JD, Fitch, W, Barker, J. Cerebral blood flow, internal carotid artery pressure, and the EEG as a guide to the safety of carotid ligation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1974;37(7):854–62.Google Scholar

Sorteberg, A, Bakke, SJ, Boysen, M, Sorteberg, W. Angiographic balloon test occlusion and therapeutic sacrifice of major arteries to the brain. Neurosurgery. 2008;63(4):651–60; discussion 60–1.Google Scholar

Barr, JD, Lemley, TJ, McCann, RM. Carotid artery balloon test occlusion: combined clinical evaluation and xenon-enhanced computed tomographic cerebral blood flow evaluation without patient transfer or balloon reinflation: technical note. Neurosurgery. 1998;43(3):634–7; discussion 7–8.Google Scholar

Sorteberg, A. Balloon occlusion tests and therapeutic vessel occlusions revisited: when, when not, and how. AJNR American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2014;35(5):862–5.Google Scholar

Sorteberg, A, Sorteberg, W, Bakke, SJ, Lindegaard, KF, Boysen, M, Nornes, H. Varying impact of common carotid artery digital compression and internal carotid artery balloon test occlusion on cerebral hemodynamics. Head & Neck. 1998;20(8):687–94.Google Scholar

Origitano, TC, al-Mefty, O, Leonetti, JP, DeMonte, F, Reichman, OH. Vascular considerations and complications in cranial base surgery. Neurosurgery. 1994;35(3):351–62; discussion 62–3.Google Scholar

Lawton, MT, Hamilton, MG, Morcos, JJ, Spetzler, RF. Revascularization and aneurysm surgery: current techniques, indications, and outcome. Neurosurgery. 1996;38(1):83–92; discussion 94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lougheed, WM, Marshall, BM, Hunter, M, Michel, ER, Sandwith-Smyth, H. Common carotid to intracranial internal carotid bypass venous graft. Technical note. J Neurosurg. 1971;34(1):114–18.Google Scholar

Kawashima, M, Rhoton, AL Jr., Tanriover, N, Ulm, AJ, Yasuda, A, Fujii, K. Microsurgical anatomy of cerebral revascularization. Part I: Anterior circulation. J Neurosurg. 2005;102(1):116–31.Google Scholar

Ausman, JI, Nicoloff, DM, Chou, SN. Posterior fossa revascularization: anastomosis of vertebral artery to PICA with interposed radial artery graft. Surgical Neurology. 1978;9(5):281–6.Google Scholar

Evans, JJ, Sekhar, LN, Rak, R, Stimac, D. Bypass grafting and revascularization in the management of posterior circulation aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2004;55(5):1036–49.Google Scholar

Strickland, BA, Rennert, RC, Bakhsheshian, J, Bulic, S, Correa, AJ, Amar, A, et al. Botulinum toxin to improve vessel graft patency in cerebral revascularization surgery: report of 3 cases. J Neurosurg. 2018;130:1–7.Google Scholar

Sia, SF, Davidson, AS, Assaad, NN, Stoodley, M, Morgan, MK. Comparative patency between intracranial arterial pedicle and vein bypass surgery. Neurosurgery. 2011;69(2):308–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Regli, L, Piepgras, DG, Hansen, KK. Late patency of long saphenous vein bypass grafts to the anterior and posterior cerebral circulation. J Neurosurg. 1995;83(5):806–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bulsara, KR, Patel, T, Fukushima, T. Cerebral bypass surgery for skull base lesions: technical notes incorporating lessons learned over two decades. Neurosurgical Focus. 2008;24(2):E11.Google Scholar

Nwasokwa, ON. Coronary artery bypass graft disease. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1995;123(7):528–45.Google Scholar

Shuhaiber, JH, Evans, AN, Massad, MG, Geha, AS. Mechanisms and future directions for prevention of vein graft failure in coronary bypass surgery. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2002;22(3):387–96.Google Scholar

Streefkerk, HJ, Bremmer, JP, Tulleken, CA. The ELANA technique: high flow revascularization of the brain. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplement. 2005;94:143–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Streefkerk, HJ, Bremmer, JP, van Weelden, M, van Dijk, RR, de Winter, E, Beck, RJ, et al. The excimer laser-assisted nonocclusive anastomosis practice model: development and application of a tool for practicing microvascular anastomosis techniques. Neurosurgery. 2006;58(1 Suppl):ONS148–56; discussion ONS56.Google Scholar

Streefkerk, HJ, Wolfs, JF, Sorteberg, W, Sorteberg, AG, Tulleken, CA. The ELANA technique: constructing a high flow bypass using a non-occlusive anastomosis on the ICA and a conventional anastomosis on the SCA in the treatment of a fusiform giant basilar trunk aneurysm. Acta Neurochirurgica. 2004;146(9):1009–19; discussion 1019.Google Scholar

Kalani, MY, Kalb, S, Martirosyan, NL, Lettieri, SC, Spetzler, RF, Porter, RW, et al. Cerebral revascularization and carotid artery resection at the skull base for treatment of advanced head and neck malignancies. J Neurosurg. 2013;118(3):637–42.Google Scholar

Terasaka, S, Asaoka, K, Kobayashi, H, Yamaguchi, S, Sawamura, Y. Natural history and surgical results of petroclival meningiomas. No Shinkei Geka. Neurological Surgery. 2010;38(9):817–24.Google Scholar

Van Havenbergh, T, Carvalho, G, Tatagiba, M, Plets, C, Samii, M. Natural history of petroclival meningiomas. Neurosurgery. 2003;52(1):55–62; discussion 64.Google Scholar

Pearson, BE, Markert, JM, Fisher, WS, Guthrie, BL, Fiveash, JB, Palmer, CA, et al. Hitting a moving target: evolution of a treatment paradigm for atypical meningiomas amid changing diagnostic criteria. Neurosurgical Focus. 2008;24(5):E3.Google Scholar

Kshettry, VR, Ostrom, QT, Kruchko, C, Al-Mefty, O, Barnett, GH, Barnholtz-Sloan, JS. Descriptive epidemiology of World Health Organization grades II and III intracranial meningiomas in the United States. Neuro-oncology. 2015;17(8):1166–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McGovern, SL, Aldape, KD, Munsell, MF, Mahajan, A, DeMonte, F, Woo, SY. A comparison of World Health Organization tumor grades at recurrence in patients with non-skull base and skull base meningiomas. J Neurosurg. 2010;112(5):925–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Litre, CF, Colin, P, Noudel, R, Peruzzi, P, Bazin, A, Sherpereel, B, et al. Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy treatment of cavernous sinus meningiomas: a study of 100 cases. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. 2009;74(4):1012–17.Google Scholar

Skeie, BS, Enger, PO, Skeie, GO, Thorsen, F, Pedersen, PH. Gamma knife surgery of meningiomas involving the cavernous sinus: long-term follow-up of 100 patients. Neurosurgery. 2010;66(4):661–8; discussion 8–9.Google Scholar

Aghi, MK, Carter, BS, Cosgrove, GR, Ojemann, RG, Amin-Hanjani, S, Martuza, RL, et al. Long-term recurrence rates of atypical meningiomas after gross total resection with or without postoperative adjuvant radiation. Neurosurgery. 2009;64(1):56–60.Google Scholar

Durand, A, Labrousse, F, Jouvet, A, Bauchet, L, Kalamarides, M, Menei, P, et al. WHO grade II and III meningiomas: a study of prognostic factors. Journal of Neuro-oncology. 2009;95(3):367–75.Google Scholar

Wanibuchi, M, Akiyama, Y, Mikami, T, Iihoshi, S, Miyata, K, Horita, Y, et al. Radical removal of recurrent malignant meningeal tumors of the cavernous sinus in combination with high-flow bypass. World Neurosurgery. 2015;83(4):424–30.Google Scholar

Di Maio, S, Rostomily, R, Sekhar, LN. Current surgical outcomes for cranial base chordomas: cohort study of 95 patients. Neurosurgery. 2011;70(6):1355–60.Google Scholar

Tzortzidis, F, Elahi, F, Wright, DC, Temkin, N, Natarajan, SK, Sekhar, LN. Patient outcome at long-term follow-up after aggressive microsurgical resection of cranial base chondrosarcomas. Neurosurgery. 2006;58(6):1090–8.Google Scholar

Sekhar, LN, Pranatartiharan, R, Chanda, A, Wright, DC. Chordomas and chondrosarcomas of the skull base: results and complications of surgical management. Neurosurgical Focus. 2001;10(3):1–4.Google Scholar

Gil, Z, Patel, SG, Singh, B, Cantu, G, Fliss, DM, Kowalski, LP, et al. Analysis of prognostic factors in 146 patients with anterior skull base sarcoma: an international collaborative study. Cancer. 2007;110(5):1033–41.Google Scholar

Ganly, I, Patel, SG, Singh, B, Kraus, DH, Bridger, PG, Cantu, G, et al. Complications of craniofacial resection for malignant tumors of the skull base: report of an International Collaborative Study. Head & Neck. 2005;27(6):445–51.Google Scholar

Feiz-Erfan, I, Han, PP, Spetzler, RF, Lanzino, G, Ferreira, MA, Gonzalez, LF, et al. Salvage of advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck: internal carotid artery sacrifice and extracranial-intracranial revascularization. Neurosurgical Focus. 2003;14(3):e6.Google Scholar

Chazono, H, Okamoto, Y, Matsuzaki, Z, Ogino, J, Endo, S, Matsuoka, T, et al. Extracranial-intracranial bypass for reconstruction of internal carotid artery in the management of head and neck cancer. Annals of Vascular Surgery. 2003;17(3):260–5.Google Scholar

Gormley, WB, Sekhar, LN, Wright, DC, Olding, M, Janecka, IP, Snyderman, CH, et al. Management and long-term outcome of adenoid cystic carcinoma with intracranial extension: a neurosurgical perspective. Neurosurgery. 1996;38(6):1105–12; discussion 12–13.Google Scholar

Lawton, MT, Lang, MJ. The future of open vascular neurosurgery: perspectives on cavernous malformations, AVMs, and bypasses for complex aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 2019;130(5):1409–25.Google Scholar

Abdulrauf, SI. Awake craniotomies for aneurysms, arteriovenous malformations, skull base tumors, high flow bypass, and brain stem lesions. Journal of Craniovertebral Junction & Spine. 2015;6(1):8–9.Google Scholar

Chen, C, Yang, Y, Ling, C, He, H, Luo, L, Wang, H. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for radial artery graft stenosis after high-flow superficial temporal artery trunk to middle cerebral artery interposition bypass. British Journal of Neurosurgery. 2019:1–4.Google Scholar

Aydin, E, Gok, M, Esenkaya, A, Cinar, C, Oran, I. Endovascular management of iatrogenic vascular injury in the craniocervical region. Turk Neurosurg. 2018;28(1):72–8.Google ScholarPubMed

Dlamini, N, Shah-Basak, P, Leung, J, Kirkham, F, Shroff, M, Kassner, A, et al. Breath-hold blood oxygen level–dependent MRI: a tool for the assessment of cerebrovascular reserve in children with Moyamoya disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018;39(9):1717–23.Google Scholar

Ge, X, Zhao, H, Zhou, Z, Li, X, Sun, B, Wu, H, et al. Association of fractional flow on 3D-TOF-MRA with cerebral perfusion in patients with MCA stenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019;40(7):1124–31.Google Scholar

Samii, M, Gerganov, V, Samii, A. Improved preservation of hearing and facial nerve function in vestibular schwannoma surgery via the retrosigmoid approach in a series of 200 patients. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2006 Oct 1;105(4):527–35.Google Scholar

Raftopoulos, C, Serieh, BA, Duprez, T, Docquier, MA, Guerit, JM. Microsurgical results with large vestibular schwannomas with preservation of facial and cochlear nerve function as the primary aim. Acta Neurochirurgica. 2005 Jul 1;147(7):697–706.Google Scholar

Sughrue, ME, Kaur, R, Rutkowski, MJ, Kane, AJ, Kaur, G, Yang, I, Pitts, LH, Parsa, AT. Extent of resection and the long-term durability of vestibular schwannoma surgery. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2011 May 1;114(5):1218–23.Google Scholar

Haque, R, Wojtasiewicz, TJ, Gigante, PR, Attiah, MA, Huang, B, Isaacson, SR, Sisti, MB. Efficacy of facial nerve-sparing approach in patients with vestibular schwannomas. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2011 Nov 1;115(5):917–23.Google Scholar

Falcioni, M, Fois, P, Taibah, A, Sanna, M. Facial nerve function after vestibular schwannoma surgery. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2011 Oct 1;115(4):820–6.Google Scholar

El Bakkouri, W, Kania, RE, Guichard, JP, Lot, G, Herman, P, Huy, PT. Conservative management of 386 cases of unilateral vestibular schwannoma: tumor growth and consequences for treatment. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2009 Apr 1;110(4):662–9.Google Scholar

Stangerup, SE, Caye-Thomasen, P, Tos, M, Thomsen, J. The natural history of vestibular schwannoma. Otology & Neurotology. 2006 Jun 1;27(4):547–52.Google Scholar

Pollock, BE, Driscoll, CL, Foote, RL, Link, MJ, Gorman, DA, Bauch, CD, Mandrekar, JN, Krecke, KN, Johnson, CH. Patient outcomes after vestibular schwannoma management: a prospective comparison of microsurgical resection and stereotactic radiosurgery. Neurosurgery. 2006 Jul 1;59(1):77–85.Google ScholarPubMed

Raftopoulos, C, Serieh, BA, Duprez, T, Docquier, MA, Guerit, JM. Microsurgical results with large vestibular schwannomas with preservation of facial and cochlear nerve function as the primary aim. Acta Neurochirurgica. 2005 Jul 1;147(7):697–706.Google Scholar

Monfared, A, Corrales, CE, Theodosopoulos, PV, Blevins, NH, Oghalai, JS, Selesnick, SH, Lee, H, Gurgel, RK, Hansen, MR, Nelson, RF, Gantz, BJ. Facial nerve outcome and tumor control rate as a function of degree of resection in treatment of large acoustic neuromas: preliminary report of the Acoustic Neuroma Subtotal Resection Study (ANSRS). Neurosurgery. 2016 Aug 1;79(2):194–203.Google Scholar

Anaizi, AN, Gantwerker, E, Pensak, M, Theodosopoulos, PV. Facial nerve preservation surgery for Koos stage 3 and 4 vestibular schwannomas. Journal of Neurological Surgery, Part B: Skull Base. 2014 Feb;75(S 01):A131.Google Scholar

van de Langenberg, R, Hanssens, PE, van Overbeeke, JJ, Verheul, JB, Nelemans, PJ, de Bondt, BJ, Stokroos, RJ. Management of large vestibular schwannoma. Part I. Planned subtotal resection followed by Gamma Knife surgery: radiological and clinical aspects. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2011A Nov 1;115(5):875–84.Google Scholar

Theodosopoulos, PV, Pensak, ML. Contemporary management of acoustic neuromas. The Laryngoscope. 2011 Jun;121(6):1133–7.Google Scholar

Gurgel, RK, Theodosopoulos, PV, Jackler, RK. Subtotal/near-total treatment of vestibular schwannomas. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery. 2012 Oct 1;20(5):380–4.Google Scholar

Breshears, JD, Osorio, JA, Cheung, SW, Barani, IJ, Theodosopoulos, PV. Surgery after primary radiation treatment for sporadic vestibular schwannomas: case series. Operative Neurosurgery. 2017 Aug 1;13(4):441–7.Google Scholar

Roche, PH, Khalil, M, Thomassin, JM, Delsanti, C, Régis, J. Surgical removal of vestibular schwannoma after failed gamma knife radiosurgery. In Modern Management of Acoustic Neuroma 2008 (Vol. 21, pp. 152–7). Karger Publishers.Google Scholar

Wise, SC, Carlson, ML, Tveiten, ØV, Driscoll, CL, Myrseth, E, Lund‐Johansen, M, Link, MJ. Surgical salvage of recurrent vestibular schwannoma following prior stereotactic radiosurgery. The Laryngoscope. 2016 Nov;126(11):2580–6.Google Scholar

Flickinger, JC, Kondziolka, D, Niranjan, A, Maitz, A, Voynov, G, Lunsford, LD. Acoustic neuroma radiosurgery with marginal tumor doses of 12 to 13 Gy. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. 2004 Sep 1;60(1):225–30.Google Scholar

Lunsford, LD, Niranjan, A, Kano, H, Kondziolka, D. The technical evolution of gamma knife radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations. In Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Brain Vascular Malformations 2013 (Vol. 27, pp. 22–34). Karger Publishers.Google Scholar

Foote, RL, Coffey, RJ, Swanson, JW, Harner, SG, Beatty, CW, Kline, RW, Stevens, LN, Hu, TC. Stereotactic radiosurgery using the gamma knife for acoustic neuromas. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. 1995 Jul 15;32(4):1153–60.Google Scholar

Yang, I, Aranda, D, Han, SJ, Chennupati, S, Sughrue, ME, Cheung, SW, Pitts, LH, Parsa, AT. Hearing preservation after stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma: a systematic review. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 2009 Jun 1;16(6):742–7.Google Scholar

Murphy, ES, Suh, JH. Radiotherapy for vestibular schwannomas: a critical review. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. 2011A Mar 15;79(4):985–97.Google Scholar

Murphy, ES, Barnett, GH, Vogelbaum, MA, Neyman, G, Stevens, GH, Cohen, BH, Elson, P, Vassil, AD, Suh, JH. Long-term outcomes of Gamma Knife radiosurgery in patients with vestibular schwannomas. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2011B Feb 1;114(2):432–40.Google Scholar

Yang, HC, Kano, H, Awan, NR, Lunsford, LD, Niranjan, A, Flickinger, JC, Novotny, J, Bhatnagar, JP, Kondziolka, D. Gamma Knife radiosurgery for larger-volume vestibular schwannomas. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2011 Mar 1;114(3):801–7.Google Scholar

Kim, HJ, Roh, KJ, Oh, HS, Chang, WS, Moon, IS. Quality of life in patients with vestibular schwannomas according to management strategy. Otology & Neurotology. 2015 Dec 1;36(10):1725–9.Google Scholar

Lo, WL, Yang, KY, Huang, YJ, Chen, WF, Liao, CC, Huang, YH. Experience with Novalis stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery. 2014 Jun 1;121:30–4.Google Scholar

van de Langenberg, R, de Bondt, BJ, Nelemans, PJ, Dohmen, AJ, Baumert, BG, Stokroos, RJ. Predictors of volumetric growth and auditory deterioration in vestibular schwannomas followed in a wait and scan policy. Otology & Neurotology. 2011B Feb 1;32(2):338–44.Google Scholar

Bozorg Grayeli, A, Kalamarides, M, Fraysse, B, Deguine, O, Favre, G, Martin, C, Mom, T, Sterkers, O. Comparison between intraoperative observations and electromyographic monitoring data for facial nerve outcome after vestibular schwannoma surgery. Acta oto-laryngologica. 2005 Jan 1;125(10):1069–74.Google Scholar

Brokinkel, B, Sauerland, C, Holling, M, Ewelt, C, Horstmann, G, van Eck, AT, Stummer, W. Gamma Knife radiosurgery following subtotal resection of vestibular schwannoma. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 2014 Dec 1;21(12):2077–82.Google Scholar

Huang, MJ, Kano, H, Mousavi, SH, Niranjan, A, Monaco, EA, Arai, Y, Flickinger, JC, Lunsford, LD. Stereotactic radiosurgery for recurrent vestibular schwannoma after previous resection. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2017 May 1;126(5):1506–13.Google Scholar

Iwai, Y, Ishibashi, K, Watanabe, Y, Uemura, G, Yamanaka, K. Functional preservation after planned partial resection followed by gamma knife radiosurgery for large vestibular schwannomas. World Neurosurgery. 2015 Aug 1;84(2):292–300.Google Scholar

Pollock, BE, Link, MJ, Foote, RL. Failure rate of contemporary low-dose radiosurgical technique for vestibular schwannoma clinical article. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2009 Oct 1;111(4):840–4.Google Scholar

Pollock, BE, Lunsford, LD, Flickinger, JC, Clyde, BL, Kondziolka, D. Vestibular schwannoma management: Part I. Failed microsurgery and the role of delayed stereotactic radiosurgery. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1998 Dec 1;89(6):944–8.Google Scholar

Breshears, JD, Chang, J, Molinaro, A, Sneed, P, Mcdermott, MW, Tward, A, Theodosopoulos, PV. Duration and timing of transient tumor enlargement after gamma knife radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas. Journal of Neurological Surgery, Part B: Skull Base. 2018 Feb;79(S 01):A086.Google Scholar

Andrews, DW, Suarez, O, Goldman, HW, Downes, MB, Bednarz, G, Corn, BW, Werner-Wasik, M, Rosenstock, J, Curran, WJ. Jr Stereotactic radiosurgery and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for the treatment of acoustic schwannomas: comparative observations of 125 patients treated at one institution. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. 2001 Aug 1;50(5):1265–78.Google Scholar

Combs, SE, Welzel, T, Schulz-Ertner, D, Huber, PE, Debus, J. Differences in clinical results after LINAC-based single-dose radiosurgery versus fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for patients with vestibular schwannomas. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. 2010 Jan 1;76(1):193–200.Google Scholar

Friedman, RA, Brackmann, DE, Hitselberger, WE, Schwartz, MS, Iqbal, Z, Berliner, KI. Surgical salvage after failed irradiation for vestibular schwannoma. The Laryngoscope. 2005 Oct;115(10):1827–32.Google Scholar

Iwai, Y, Yamanaka, K, Yamagata, K, Yasui, T. Surgery after radiosurgery for acoustic neuromas: surgical strategy and histological findings. Operative Neurosurgery. 2007 Feb 1;60(suppl 2):ONS-75.Google Scholar

Plotkin, SR, Stemmer-Rachamimov, AO, Barker, FG, Halpin, C, Padera, TP, Tyrrell, A, Sorensen, AG, Jain, RK, di Tomaso, E. Hearing improvement after bevacizumab in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2. New England Journal of Medicine. 2009 Jul 23;361(4):358–67.Google Scholar

Nakatomi, H, Jacob, JT, Carlson, ML, Tanaka, S, Tanaka, M, Saito, N, Lohse, CM, Driscoll, CL, Link, MJ. Long-term risk of recurrence and regrowth after gross-total and subtotal resection of sporadic vestibular schwannoma. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2017 May 1;1(aop):1–7.Google Scholar

Horwitz, NH. Walter Edward Dandy (1886–1946). Neurosurgery. 1997 Jan 1;40(1):211–15.Google Scholar

Yamamoto, I, Jr AL, Rhoton, Peace, DA. Microsurgery of the third ventricle, Part 1: Microsurgical anatomy. Neurosurgery. 1981 Mar 1;8(3):334–56.Google Scholar

Wen, HT, Rhoton, AL, de Oliveira E Jr. Transchoroidal approach to the third ventricle: an anatomic study of the choroidal fissure and its clinical application. Neurosurgery. 1998 Jun 1;42(6):1205–17.Google Scholar

Carota, A, Rizzo, E, Broways, P, Calabrese, P. Pure anterograde memory deficit due to secondary lymphoma of the fornix. European Neurology. 2013;70(3–4):242.Google Scholar

Pendl, G, Öztürk, E, Haselsberger, K. Surgery of tumours of the lateral ventricle. Acta Neurochirurgica. 1992 Jun 1;116(2–4):128–36.Google Scholar

Kasowski, HJ, Nahed, BV, Piepmeier, JM. Transcallosal transchoroidal approach to tumors of the third ventricle. Operative Neurosurgery. 2005 Oct 1;57(suppl 4):ONS-361.Google Scholar

Fonseca, RB, Black, PM, Azevedo Filho, H. Approaches to the third ventricle. Arquivos Brasileiros de Neurocirurgia: Brazilian Neurosurgery. 2012 Mar;31(01):3–9.Google Scholar

Fujii, K, Lenkey, C, Rhoton, Jr AL. Microsurgical anatomy of the choroidal arteries: Lateral and third ventricles. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1980 Feb;52(2):165–88.Google Scholar

Villani, RM, Tomei, G. Approach to tumors of the third ventricle. In Schmidek, HH, Roberts, DW, eds., Schmidek and Sweet’s Operative Neurosurgical Techniques: Indications, Methods, and Results, 5th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2006:772–85.Google Scholar

Hirsch, JF, Zouaoui, A, Renier, D, Pierre-Kahn, A. A new surgical approach to the third ventricle with interruption of the striothalamic vein. Acta Neurochirurgica. 1979 Sep 1;47(3–4):135–47.Google Scholar

Rhoton, AL Jr. The lateral and third ventricles. Neurosurgery. 2002;51(4 Suppl): S207–71.Google Scholar

Viale, GL, Turtas, S. The sub choroid approach to the third ventricle. Surgical Neurology. 1980 Jul;14(1):71–4.Google Scholar

Cikla, U, Swanson, KI, Tumturk, A, Keser, N, Uluc, K, Cohen-Gadol, A, Baskaya, MK. Microsurgical resection of tumors of the lateral and third ventricles: operative corridors for difficult-to-reach lesions. Journal of Neuro-oncology. 2016 Nov 1;130(2):331–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ito, Y, Inoue, T, Tamura, A, Tsutsumi, K. Interhemispheric transchoroidal approach to resect third ventricular teratoma. Neurosurgical focus. 2016 Jan;40(Video Suppl 1):1.Google Scholar

Ding, D, Furneaux, CE. Combined transchoroidal and subchoroidal approach for resection of a large hemorrhagic epithelial cyst: Expanding the operative corridor to the third ventricle. Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice. 2017 Jan;8(1):145.Google Scholar

Anderson, RC, Ghatan, S, Feldstein, NA. Surgical approaches to tumors of the lateral ventricle. Neurosurgery Clinics. 2003 Oct 1;14(4):509–25.Google Scholar

Yasargil, MG, Abdulrauf, SI. Surgery of intraventricular tumors. Neurosurgery. 2008;62(6 Suppl 3):1029–40.Google Scholar

Finch, NW, Ding, D, Oldfield, EH, Druzgal, J. Agenesis of anterior falx cerebri in patient with planned interhemispheric approach to third ventricle mass. World Neurosurgery. 2018 Jan 1;109:162–4.Google Scholar

Petridis, Athanasios K. Commentary. Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice 2017; 8(1):147.Google Scholar

Türe, U, Yaşargil, MG, Al-Mefty, O. The transcallosal–transforaminal approach to the third ventricle with regard to the venous variations in this region. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1997 Nov;87(5):706–15.Google Scholar

Lang, J. Topographic anatomy of preformed intracranial spaces. In Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery I. Vienna: Springer; 1992: 1–10.Google Scholar

Tubbs, RS, Oakes, P, Maran, IS, Salib, C, Loukas, M. The foramen of Monro: a review of its anatomy, history, pathology, and surgery. Child’s Nervous System. 2014 Oct 1;30(10):1645–9.Google Scholar

Cai, Q, Wang, J, Wang, L, Deng, G, Chen, Q, Chen, Z. A classification of lesions around interventricular foramen and its clinical value. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology. 2015;8(9):9950.Google Scholar

Taghva, A, Liu, CY, Apuzzo, ML. Transcallosal surgery of lesions affecting the third ventricle: basic principles. In Schmidek and Sweet Operative Neurosurgical Techniques. 6th ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2012: 339–50.Google Scholar

Patel, P, Cohen-Gadol, AA, Boop, F, Klimo, Jr P. Technical strategies for the transcallosal transforaminal approach to third ventricle tumors: expanding the operative corridor. Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics. 2014 Oct;14(4):365–71.Google Scholar

Jane, JA, Park, TS, Pobereskin, LH, Winn, HR, Butler, AB. The supraorbital approach: technical note. Neurosurgery. 1982;11(4):537–42.Google Scholar

Delashaw, JB, Jane, JA, Kassell, NF, Luce, C. Supraorbital craniotomy by fracture of the anterior orbital roof. J Neurosurg. 1993;79(4):615–18.Google Scholar

Shanno, G, Maus, M, Bilyk, J, et al. Image-guided transorbital roof craniotomy via a suprabrow approach: a surgical series of 72 patients. Neurosurgery. 2001;48(3):559–68.Google Scholar

Paluzzi, A, Gardner, PA, Fernandez-Miranda, JC, et al. Round-the-clock surgical access to the orbit. J Neurol Surgery, Part B: Skull Base. 2015;76(1):12–24.Google Scholar

Wang, Y, Tooley, AA, Mehta, VJ, Garrity, JA, Harrison, AR, Thyroid Orbitopathy, Mettu P.. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2018;58(2):137–79.Google Scholar

Srinivasan, A, Bilyk, JR. Transcranial approaches to the orbit. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2018;58(2):101–10.Google Scholar

Bejjani, GK, Cockerham, KP, Kennerdel, JS, Maroon, JC. A reappraisal of surgery for orbital tumors. Part I: extraorbital approaches. Neurosurg Focus. 2001;10(5):1–6.Google Scholar

Abuzayed, B, Kucukyuruk, B, Tanriover, N, et al. Transcranial superior orbitotomy for the treatment of intraorbital intraconal tumors: surgical technique and long-term results in single institute. Neurosurg Rev. 2012;35(4):573–82.Google Scholar

Bradley, EA, Bartley, GB, Garrity, JA. Surgical management of Graves’ ophthalmopathy. In Bahn, RS, ed. Thyroid Eye Disease. Boston: Springer; 2001: 219–33.Google Scholar

Naffziger, HC. The surgical treatment of progressive exophthalmos following thyroidectomy. J Am Med Assoc. 1932;99(8):638.Google Scholar

Stranc, M, West, M. A four-wall orbital decompression for dysthyroid orbitopathy. J Neurosurg. 1988;68(5):671–7.Google Scholar

Linnet, J, Hegedus, L, Bjerre, P. Results of a neurosurgical two-wall orbital decompression in the treatment of severe thyroid associated ophthalmopathy. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2001;79(1):49–52.Google Scholar

Garrity, JA, Fatourechi, V, Bergstralh, EJ, et al. Results of transantral orbital decompression in 428 patients with severe Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;116(5):533–47.Google Scholar

Fatourechi, V, Bartley, GB, Garrity, JA, Bergstralh, EJ, Ebersold, MJ, Gorman, CA. Transfrontal orbital decompression after failure of transantral decompression in optic neuropathy of Graves’ disease. Mayo Clin Proc. 1993;68(6):552–5.Google Scholar

Maroon, JC, Kennerdell, JS. Surgical approaches to the orbit: indications and techniques. J Neurosurg. 1984;60(6):1226–35.Google Scholar

Cockerham, KP, Bejjani, GK, Kennerdell, JS, Maroon, JC. Surgery for orbital tumors. Part II: transorbital approaches. Neurosurg Focus. 2001;10(5):E3.Google Scholar

Ditzel Filho, LFS, McLaughlin, N, Bresson, D, Solari, D, Kassam, AB, Kelly, DF. Supraorbital eyebrow craniotomy for removal of intraaxial frontal brain tumors: a technical note. World Neurosurg. 2014;81(2):348–56.Google Scholar

Owusu Boahene, KD, Lim, M, Chu, E, Quinones-Hinojosa, A. Transpalpebral orbitofrontal craniotomy: a minimally invasive approach to anterior cranial vault lesions. Skull Base. 2010;20(4):237–44.Google Scholar

Jordan, DR, Mawn, LA, Anderson, RL. Surgical Anatomy of the Ocular Adnexa, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.Google Scholar

Greenfield, L, Mulholland, M, Doherty, G, eds. Greenfield’s Surgery: Scientific Principles and Practice. 4th ed. New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.Google Scholar

Rolston, JD, Han, SJ, Lau, CY, Berger, MS, Parsa, AT. Frequency and predictors of complications in neurological surgery: national trends from 2006 to 2011. J Neurosurg. 2014;120(3):736–45.Google Scholar

Ling, JD, Mehta, V, Fathy, C, et al. Racial disparities in corneal transplantation rates, complications, and outcomes. Semin Ophthalmol. 2016;31(4):337–44.Google Scholar

Sosa, JA, Mehta, PJ, Wang, TS, Yeo, HL, Roman, SA. Racial disparities in clinical and economic outcomes from thyroidectomy. Ann Surg. 2007;246(6):1083–91.Google Scholar

Latz, B, Mordhorst, C, Kerz, T, et al. Post-operative nausea and vomiting in patients after craniotomy: incidence and risk factors. J Neurosurg. 2011;114(2):491–6.Google Scholar

Gan, TJ, Meyer, T, Apfel, CC, et al. Consensus guidelines for managing post-operative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg. 2003;97(1):62–71.Google Scholar

Patel, SG, Singh, B, Polluri, A, et al. Craniofacial surgery for malignant skull base tumors. Cancer. 2003;98(6):1179–87.Google Scholar

Feiz-Erfan, I, Spetzler, RF, Horn, EM, et al. Proposed classification for the transbasal approach and its modifications. Skull Base. 2008;18(1):29–47.Google Scholar

Jittapiromsak, P, Wu, A, Deshmukh, P, et al. Comparative analysis of extensions of transbasal approaches: effect on access to midline and paramedian structures. Skull Base. 2009;19(6):387–99.Google Scholar

Kim, SR, Lee, JW, Han, YS, Kim, HK. Transfacial surgical approaches to secure wide exposure of the skull base, transfacial surgical approaches to secure wide exposure of the skull base. Arch Craniofac Surg. 2015;16(1):17–23.Google Scholar

Spetzler, RF, Herman, JM, Beals, S, Joganic, E, Milligan, J. Preservation of olfaction in anterior craniofacial approaches. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1993;79(1):48–52.Google Scholar

Sanna, M, Fois, P, Russo, A, Falcioni, M. Management of meningoencephalic herniation of the temporal bone: personal experience and literature review. Laryngoscope 2009;119:1579–85.Google Scholar

Egilmez, OK, Hanege, FM, Kalcioglu, MT, Kaner, T, Kokten, N. Tegmen tympani defect and brain herniation secondary to mastoid surgery: case presentation. Case Rep Otolaryngol 2014;2014:756280.Google Scholar

Alonso, RC, de la Pena, MJ, Caicoya, AG, Rodriguez, MR, Moreno, EA, de Vega Fernandez VM: Spontaneous skull base meningoencephaloceles and cerebrospinal fluid fistulas. Radiographics 2013;33:553–70.Google Scholar

Marchioni, D, Bonali, M, Alicandri-Ciufelli, M, Rubini, A, Pavesi, G, Presutti, L. Combined approach for tegmen defects repair in patients with cerebrospinal fluid otorrhea or herniations: our experience. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2014;75:279–87.Google Scholar

Jeevan, DS, Ormond, DR, Kim, AH, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid leaks and encephaloceles of temporal bone origin: nuances to diagnosis and management. World Neurosurg 2015;83:560–6.Google Scholar

Schuknecht, B, Simmen, D, Briner, HR, Holzmann, D. Nontraumatic skull base defects with spontaneous CSF rhinorrhea and arachnoid herniation: imaging findings and correlation with endoscopic sinus surgery in 27 patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:542–9.Google Scholar

Souliere, CR, Jr., Langman, AW. Combined mastoid/middle cranial fossa repair of temporal bone encephalocele. Skull Base Surg 1998;8:185–9.Google Scholar

Byrne, RW, Smith, AP, Roh, D, Kanner, A. Occult middle fossa encephaloceles in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. World Neurosurg 2010;73:541–6.Google Scholar

Gacek, RR, Gacek, MR, Tart, R. Adult spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid otorrhea: diagnosis and management. Am J Otol 1999;20:770–6.Google Scholar

Stucken, EZ, Selesnick, SH, Brown, KD. The role of obesity in spontaneous temporal bone encephaloceles and CSF leak. Otol Neurotol 2012;33:1412–17.Google Scholar

Sugerman, HJ, DeMaria, EJ, Felton, WL, 3rd, Nakatsuka, M, Sismanis, A. Increased intra-abdominal pressure and cardiac filling pressures in obesity-associated pseudotumor cerebri. Neurology 1997;49:507–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bakhsheshian, J, Hwang, MS, Friedman, M. Association between obstructive sleep apnea and spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid leaks: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015;141:733–8.Google Scholar

Woodworth, BA, Prince, A, Chiu, AG, et al. Spontaneous CSF leaks: a paradigm for definitive repair and management of intracranial hypertension. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;138:715–20.Google Scholar

Braca, JA, 3rd, Marzo, S, Prabhu, VC. Cerebrospinal fluid leakage from tegmen tympani defects repaired via the middle cranial fossa approach. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2013;74:103–7.Google Scholar

Parisier, SC. The middle cranial fossa approach to the internal auditory canal – an anatomical study stressing critical distances between surgical landmarks. Laryngoscope 1977;87:1–20.Google Scholar

Toth, M, Helling, K, Baksa, G, Mann, W. Localization of congenital tegmen tympani defects. Otol Neurotol 2007;28:1120–3.Google Scholar

Semaan, MT, Gilpin, DA, Hsu, DP, Wasman, JK, Megerian, CA. Transmastoid extradural-intracranial approach for repair of transtemporal meningoencephalocele: a review of 31 consecutive cases. Laryngoscope 2011;121:1765–72.Google Scholar

Rao, AK, Merenda, DM, Wetmore, SJ. Diagnosis and management of spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid otorrhea. Otol Neurotol 2005;26:1171–5.Google Scholar

Dutt, SN, Mirza, S, Irving, RM. Middle cranial fossa approach for the repair of spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid otorrhoea using autologous bone pate. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2001;26:117–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Perez, E, Carlton, D, Alfarano, M, Smouha, E. Transmastoid repair of spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid leaks. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2018;79:451–7.Google Scholar

Mayeno, JK, Korol, HW, Nutik, SL. Spontaneous meningoencephalic herniation of the temporal bone: case series with recommended treatment. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130:486–9.Google Scholar

Gioacchini, FM, Cassandro, E, Alicandri-Ciufelli, M, et al. Surgical outcomes in the treatment of temporal bone cerebrospinal fluid leak: A systematic review. Auris Nasus Larynx 2018;45:903–10.Google Scholar

Kutz, JW, Jr., Husain, IA, Isaacson, B, Roland, PS. Management of spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid otorrhea. Laryngoscope 2008;118:2195–9.Google Scholar

Carlson, ML, Copeland, WR III, Driscoll, CL, et al. Temporal bone encephalocele and cerebrospinal fluid fistula repair utilizing the middle cranial fossa or combined mastoid-middle cranial fossa approach. J Neurosurg 2013;119:1314–22.Google Scholar

Brown, NE, Grundfast, KM, Jabre, A, Megerian, CA, O’Malley, BW Jr., Rosenberg, SI. Diagnosis and management of spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid-middle ear effusion and otorrhea. Laryngoscope 2004;114:800–805.Google Scholar

Hoang, S, Ortiz Torres, MJ, Rivera, AL, Litofsky, NS. Middle cranial fossa approach to repair tegmen defects with autologous or alloplastic graft. World Neurosurg 2018;118:e10–e17.Google Scholar

Sanna, M, Dispenza, F, Flanagan, S, De Stefano, A, Falcioni, M. Management of chronic otitis by middle ear obliteration with blind sac closure of the external auditory canal. Otol Neurotol 2008;29:19–22.Google Scholar

Leonetti, JP, Marzo, S, Anderson, D, Origitano, T, Vukas, DD. Spontaneous transtemporal CSF leakage: a study of 51 cases. Ear Nose Throat J 2005;84:700,2–4, 6.Google Scholar

Wootten, CT, Kaylie, DM, Warren, FM, Jackson, CG. Management of brain herniation and cerebrospinal fluid leak in revision chronic ear surgery. Laryngoscope 2005;115:1256–61.Google Scholar

Lloyd, KM, DelGaudio, JM, Hudgins, PA. Imaging of skull base cerebrospinal fluid leaks in adults. Radiology 2008;248:725–36.Google Scholar

Gubbels, SP, Selden, NR, Delashaw, JB Jr., McMenomey, SO. Spontaneous middle fossa encephalocele and cerebrospinal fluid leakage: diagnosis and management. Otol Neurotol 2007;28:1131–9.Google Scholar

Bovo, R, Ceruti, S, Padovani, R, Martini, A. Temporal bone brain herniation. Otol Neurotol 2006;27:576–7.Google Scholar

De Foer, B, Vercruysse, JP, Bernaerts, A, et al. Detection of postoperative residual cholesteatoma with non-echo-planar diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Otol Neurotol 2008;29:513–7.Google Scholar

Gonen, L, Handzel, O, Shimony, N, Fliss, DM, Margalit, N. Surgical management of spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid leakage through temporal bone defects–case series and review of the literature. Neurosurg Rev 2016;39:141–50; discussion 50.Google Scholar

Zanetti, DG, Werner, G, Gaini, L. Transmastoid repair of temporal meningoencephaloceles and cerebrospinal fluid otorrhea. Otorhinolaryngology Clinics: An International Journal 2011;3:31–41.Google Scholar

Jackson, CG, Pappas, DG Jr., Manolidis, S, et al. Brain herniation into the middle ear and mastoid: concepts in diagnosis and surgical management. Am J Otol 1997;18:198–205; discussion 206.Google Scholar

Zanoletti, E, Mazzoni, A, Martini, A, et al. Surgery of the lateral skull base: a 50-year endeavour. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2019;39:S1–S146.Google Scholar

Sergi, B, Passali, GC, Picciotti, PM, De Corso, E, Paludetti, G. Transmastoid approach to repair meningoencephalic herniation in the middle ear. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2013;33:97–101.Google Scholar

Scheich, M, Ginzkey, C, Ehrmann Muller, D, Shehata Dieler, W, Hagen, R. Complications of the Middle Cranial Fossa Approach for Acoustic Neuroma Removal. J Int Adv Otol 2017;13:186–90.Google Scholar

Scheich, M, Ginzkey, C, Ehrmann-Muller, D, Shehata-Dieler, W, Hagen, R. Management of CSF leakage after microsurgery for vestibular schwannoma via the middle cranial fossa approach. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016;273:2975–81.Google Scholar

Teachey, W, Grayson, J, Cho, DY, Riley, KO, Woodworth, BA. Intervention for elevated intracranial pressure improves success rate after repair of spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid leaks. Laryngoscope 2017;127:2011–16.Google Scholar

Governale, LS, Fein, N, Logsdon, J, Black, PM. Techniques and complications of external lumbar drainage for normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 2008;63:379–84; discussion 384.Google Scholar

Kim, L, Wisely, CE, Dodson, EE. Transmastoid approach to spontaneous temporal bone cerebrospinal fluid leaks: hearing improvement and success of repair. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014;150:472–8.Google Scholar

Oghalai, J.S., and Driscoll, C.L.W., Atlas of Neurotologic and Lateral Skull Base Surgery. 1st ed. 2016: Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar

Sanna, M., et al., Atlas of Microsurgery of the Lateral Skull Base. 2nd ed. 2007: New York: Thieme.Google Scholar

Roberson, J.B., Jr., Brackmann, D.E., and Fayad, J.N., Complications of venous insufficiency after neurotologic-skull base surgery. Am J Otol, 2000. 21(5): pp. 701–5.Google ScholarPubMed

House, W.F., and Hitselberger, W.E., The transcochlear approach to the skull base. Arch Otolaryngol, 1976. 102(6): pp. 334–42.Google Scholar

Goddard, J.C., and McRackan, T.R., Transcochlear approach to cerebellopontine angle lesions, in Otologic Surgery, Brackmann, D.E., Shelton, C., and Arriaga, M.A., eds. 2016: Amsterdam: Elsevier; pp. 557–66.Google Scholar

Chawla, S, and Bowman, J.B., The transotic and transcochlear approaches. Operative Techniques in Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, 2013. 24(3): pp. 157–62.Google Scholar

Angeli, S.I., De la Cruz, A., and Hitselberger, W., The transcochlear approach revisited. Otology & Neurotology, 2001. 22(5): pp. 690–5.Google Scholar

Sanna, M., et al., Surgical management of jugular foramen schwannomas with hearing and facial nerve function preservation: a series of 23 cases and review of the literature. Laryngoscope, 2006. 116(12): pp. 2191–204.Google Scholar

Fisch, U., Infratemporal fossa approach to tumors of the temporal bone and base of the skull. Journal of Laryngology & Otology, 1978. 92(11): pp. 949–67.Google Scholar

Chan, J., et al., Anterior and subtemporal approaches to the infratemporal fossa, in Otologic Surgery, Brackmann, D.E., Shelton, C., and Arriaga, M.A., eds. 2016: Amsterdam: Elsevier; pp. 557–66.Google Scholar

Anderson, S.B., and Panizza, B.M., Petro-occipital transsigmoid approach. Operative Techniques in Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, 2013. 24(3): pp. 163–8.Google Scholar

Mazzoni, A., et al., Lower cranial nerve schwannomas involving the jugular foramen. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 1997. 106(5): pp. 370–9.Google Scholar

Mazzoni, A., and Sanna, M., A posterolateral approach to the skull base: the petro-occipital transsigmoid approach. Skull Base Surg, 1995. 5(3): pp. 157–67.Google Scholar

Mann, W.J., et al., Transsigmoid approach for tumors of the jugular foramen. Skull Base Surg, 1991. 1(3): pp. 137–41.Google Scholar

Tucci, D.L., Kaylie, D.M., and Fukushima, T., Extreme lateral infrajugular transcondylar approach for resection of skull base tumors, in Otologic Surgery, Brackmann, D.E., Shelton, C., and Arriaga, M.A., eds. 2016: Amsterdam: Elsevier; pp. 634–45.Google Scholar

Lazard, D.S., et al., Early complications and symptoms of cerebellopontine angle tumor surgery: a prospective analysis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2011. 268(11): pp. 1575–82.Google Scholar

Darrouzet, V., et al., Vestibular schwannoma surgery outcomes: our multidisciplinary experience in 400 cases over 17 years. Laryngoscope, 2004. 114(4): pp. 681–8.Google Scholar

Samii, M., and Matthies, C., Management of 1000 vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas): the facial nerve–preservation and restitution of function. Neurosurgery, 1997. 40(4): pp. 684–94; discussion 694–5.Google Scholar

Schick, B., and Dlugaiczyk, J., Surgery of the ear and the lateral skull base: pitfalls and complications. GMS Current Topics in Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, 2013. 12: p. Doc05.Google Scholar

Russel, A., et al., Can the risks of cerebrospinal fluid leak after vestibular schwannoma surgery be predicted? Otol Neurotol, 2017. 38(2): pp. 248–52.Google Scholar

Fishman, A.J., et al., Prevention and management of cerebrospinal fluid leak following vestibular schwannoma surgery. The Laryngoscope, 2009. 114(3): pp. 501–5.Google Scholar

Heman-Ackah, S.E., J.G. Golfinos, and J.T. Roland, Management of surgical complications and failures in acoustic neuroma surgery. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, 2012. 45(2): pp. 455–70.Google Scholar

Teachey, W., et al., Intervention for elevated intracranial pressure improves success rate after repair of spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid leaks. The Laryngoscope, 2017. 127(9): pp. 2011–16.Google Scholar

Chaaban, M.R., et al., Acetazolamide for high intracranial pressure cerebrospinal fluid leaks. International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology, 2013. 3(9): pp. 718–21.Google Scholar

Rubin, R.C., et al., The production of cerebrospinal fluid in man and its modification by acetazolamide. J Neurosurg, 1966. 25(4): pp. 430–6.Google Scholar

Wilkinson, E.P., Brackmann, D.E., and Lupo, J.E., Management of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak, in Otologic Surgery, Brackmann, D.E., Shelton, C., and Arriaga, M.A., eds. 2016: Amsterdam: Elsevier; pp. 646–52.Google Scholar

Allen, K.P., et al., Lumbar subarachnoid drainage in cerebrospinal fluid leaks after lateral skull base surgery. Otol Neurotol, 2011. 32(9): pp. 1522–4.Google Scholar

Crowson, M.G., et al., Preoperative lumbar drain use during acoustic neuroma surgery and effect on CSF leak incidence. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 2016. 125(1): pp. 63–8.Google Scholar

Poe, D.S., et al., Long-term results after lateral cranial base surgery. Laryngoscope, 1991. 101(4 Pt 1): pp. 372–8.Google Scholar

Brackman, D., Kinney, S., and Fu, K., Glomus tumor: diagnosis and management. Head Neck Surg, 1987. 9(5): pp. 306–11.Google Scholar

Sanna, M., et al., Petrous bone cholesteatoma: classification, management and review of the literature. Audiol Neurootol, 2011. 16(2): pp. 124–36.Google Scholar

Russo, A., et al., Anterior and posterior facial nerve rerouting: a comparative study. Skull Base, 2003. 13(3): pp. 123–30.Google Scholar

Bambakidis, NC, Kakarla, UK, Kim, LJ, Nakaji, P, Porter, RW, Daspit, CP, et al. Evolution of surgical approaches in the treatment of petroclival meningiomas: a retrospective review. Neurosurgery. 2008;62(6 Suppl 3):1182–91.Google Scholar

Bernardo, A, Evins, AI, Visca, A, Stieg, PE. The intracranial facial nerve as seen through different surgical windows: an extensive anatomosurgical study. Neurosurgery. 2013;72(2 Suppl Operative):ons194–207.Google Scholar

Chanda, A, Nanda, A. Partial labyrinthectomy petrous apicectomy approach to the petroclival region: an anatomic and technical study. Neurosurgery. 2002;51(1):147–59; discussion 59–60.Google Scholar

Wu, CY, Lan, Q. Quantification of the presigmoid transpetrosal keyhole approach to petroclival region. Chin Med J (Engl). 2008;121(8):740–4.Google Scholar

Cho, CW, Al-Mefty, O. Combined petrosal approach to petroclival meningiomas. Neurosurgery. 2002;51(3):708–16; discussion 16–18.Google Scholar

Horgan, MA, Anderson, GJ, Kellogg, JX, Schwartz, MS, Spektor, S, McMenomey, SO, et al. Classification and quantification of the petrosal approach to the petroclival region. J Neurosurg. 2000;93(1):108–12.Google Scholar

Janjua, MB, Caruso, JP, Greenfield, JP, Souweidane, MM, Schwartz, TH. The combined transpetrosal approach: anatomic study and literature review. J Clin Neurosci. 2017;41:36–40.Google Scholar

Miller, CG, van Loveren, HR, Keller, JT, Pensak, M, el-Kalliny, M, Tew, JM Jr. Transpetrosal approach: surgical anatomy and technique. Neurosurgery. 1993;33(3):461–9; discussion 9.Google Scholar

Miller, ME, Mastrodimos, B, Cueva, RA. Facial nerve function after the extended translabyrinthine approach. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2015;76(1):1–6.Google Scholar

Yang, J, Zhang, F, Xu, A, Li, H, Ding, Z. Comparison of surgical exposure and maneuverability associated with microscopy and endoscopy in the retrolabyrinthine and transcrusal approaches to the retrochiasmatic region: a cadaveric study. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016;158(4):703–10.Google Scholar

Chang, SW, Wu, A, Gore, P, Beres, E, Porter, RW, Preul, MC, et al. Quantitative comparison of Kawase’s approach versus the retrosigmoid approach: implications for tumors involving both middle and posterior fossae. Neurosurgery. 2009;64(3 Suppl):ons44-51.Google Scholar

Mason, E, Rompaey, JV, Solares, CA, Figueroa, R, Prevedello, D. Subtemporal retrolabyrinthine (posterior petrosal) versus endoscopic endonasal approach to the petroclival region: an anatomical and computed tomography study. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2016;77(3):231–7.Google Scholar

Xu, F, Karampelas, I, Megerian, CA, Selman, WR, Bambakidis, NC. Petroclival meningiomas: an update on surgical approaches, decision making, and treatment results. Neurosurg Focus. 2013;35(6):E11.Google Scholar

House, WF, Hitselberger, WE. The transcochlear approach to the skull base. Arch Otolaryngol. 1976;102(6):334–42.Google Scholar

House, WF, De la Cruz, A, Hitselberger, WE. Surgery of the skull base: transcochlear approach to the petrous apex and clivus. Otolaryngology. 1978;86(5):ORL-770–9.Google Scholar

Little, AS, Jittapiromsak, P, Crawford, NR, Deshmukh, P, Preul, MC, Spetzler, RF, et al. Quantitative analysis of exposure of staged orbitozygomatic and retrosigmoid craniotomies for lesions of the clivus with supratentorial extension. Neurosurgery. 2008;62(5 Suppl 2):ons318–23; discussion ons23–4.Google Scholar

Siwanuwatn, R, Deshmukh, P, Figueiredo, EG, Crawford, NR, Spetzler, RF, Preul, MC. Quantitative analysis of the working area and angle of attack for the retrosigmoid, combined petrosal, and transcochlear approaches to the petroclival region. J Neurosurg. 2006;104(1):137–42.Google Scholar

Lemole, GM, Jr., Henn, JS, Zabramski, JM, Spetzler, RF. Modifications to the orbitozygomatic approach. Technical note. J Neurosurg. 2003;99(5):924–30.Google Scholar

Bambakidis, NC, Kakarla, UK, Kim, LJ, Nakaji, P, Porter, RW, Daspit, CP, et al. Evolution of surgical approaches in the treatment of petroclival meningiomas: a retrospective review. Neurosurgery. 2008;62(6 Suppl 3):1182–91.Google Scholar

Bernardo, A, Evins, AI, Visca, A, Stieg, PE. The intracranial facial nerve as seen through different surgical windows: an extensive anatomosurgical study. Neurosurgery. 2013;72(2 Suppl Operative):ons194–207.Google Scholar

Chanda, A, Nanda, A. Partial labyrinthectomy petrous apicectomy approach to the petroclival region: an anatomic and technical study. Neurosurgery. 2002;51(1):147–59; discussion 59–60.Google Scholar

Wu, CY, Lan, Q. Quantification of the presigmoid transpetrosal keyhole approach to petroclival region. Chin Med J (Engl). 2008;121(8):740–4.Google Scholar

Cho, CW, Al-Mefty, O. Combined petrosal approach to petroclival meningiomas. Neurosurgery. 2002;51(3):708–16; discussion 16–18.Google Scholar

Horgan, MA, Anderson, GJ, Kellogg, JX, Schwartz, MS, Spektor, S, McMenomey, SO, et al. Classification and quantification of the petrosal approach to the petroclival region. J Neurosurg. 2000;93(1):108–12.Google Scholar

Janjua, MB, Caruso, JP, Greenfield, JP, Souweidane, MM, Schwartz, TH. The combined transpetrosal approach: anatomic study and literature review. J Clin Neurosci. 2017;41:36–40.Google Scholar

Miller, CG, van Loveren, HR, Keller, JT, Pensak, M, el-Kalliny, M, Tew, JM Jr. Transpetrosal approach: surgical anatomy and technique. Neurosurgery. 1993;33(3):461–9; discussion 9.Google Scholar

Miller, ME, Mastrodimos, B, Cueva, RA. Facial nerve function after the extended translabyrinthine approach. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2015;76(1):1–6.Google Scholar

Yang, J, Zhang, F, Xu, A, Li, H, Ding, Z. Comparison of surgical exposure and maneuverability associated with microscopy and endoscopy in the retrolabyrinthine and transcrusal approaches to the retrochiasmatic region: a cadaveric study. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016;158(4):703–10.Google Scholar

Chang, SW, Wu, A, Gore, P, Beres, E, Porter, RW, Preul, MC, et al. Quantitative comparison of Kawase’s approach versus the retrosigmoid approach: implications for tumors involving both middle and posterior fossae. Neurosurgery. 2009;64(3 Suppl):ons44-51.Google Scholar

Mason, E, Rompaey, JV, Solares, CA, Figueroa, R, Prevedello, D. Subtemporal retrolabyrinthine (posterior petrosal) versus endoscopic endonasal approach to the petroclival region: an anatomical and computed tomography study. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2016;77(3):231–7.Google Scholar

Xu, F, Karampelas, I, Megerian, CA, Selman, WR, Bambakidis, NC. Petroclival meningiomas: an update on surgical approaches, decision making, and treatment results. Neurosurg Focus. 2013;35(6):E11.Google Scholar

House, WF, Hitselberger, WE. The transcochlear approach to the skull base. Arch Otolaryngol. 1976;102(6):334–42.Google Scholar

House, WF, De la Cruz, A, Hitselberger, WE. Surgery of the skull base: transcochlear approach to the petrous apex and clivus. Otolaryngology. 1978;86(5):ORL-770–9.Google Scholar

Little, AS, Jittapiromsak, P, Crawford, NR, Deshmukh, P, Preul, MC, Spetzler, RF, et al. Quantitative analysis of exposure of staged orbitozygomatic and retrosigmoid craniotomies for lesions of the clivus with supratentorial extension. Neurosurgery. 2008;62(5 Suppl 2):ons318–23; discussion ons23–4.Google Scholar

Siwanuwatn, R, Deshmukh, P, Figueiredo, EG, Crawford, NR, Spetzler, RF, Preul, MC. Quantitative analysis of the working area and angle of attack for the retrosigmoid, combined petrosal, and transcochlear approaches to the petroclival region. J Neurosurg. 2006;104(1):137–42.Google Scholar

Lemole, GM, Jr., Henn, JS, Zabramski, JM, Spetzler, RF. Modifications to the orbitozygomatic approach. Technical note. J Neurosurg. 2003;99(5):924–30.Google Scholar

Bambakidis, NC, Kakarla, UK, Kim, LJ, Nakaji, P, Porter, RW, Daspit, CP, et al. Evolution of surgical approaches in the treatment of petroclival meningiomas: a retrospective review. Neurosurgery. 2008;62(6 Suppl 3):1182–91.Google Scholar

Bernardo, A, Evins, AI, Visca, A, Stieg, PE. The intracranial facial nerve as seen through different surgical windows: an extensive anatomosurgical study. Neurosurgery. 2013;72(2 Suppl Operative):ons194–207.Google Scholar

Chanda, A, Nanda, A. Partial labyrinthectomy petrous apicectomy approach to the petroclival region: an anatomic and technical study. Neurosurgery. 2002;51(1):147–59; discussion 59–60.Google Scholar

Wu, CY, Lan, Q. Quantification of the presigmoid transpetrosal keyhole approach to petroclival region. Chin Med J (Engl). 2008;121(8):740–4.Google Scholar

Cho, CW, Al-Mefty, O. Combined petrosal approach to petroclival meningiomas. Neurosurgery. 2002;51(3):708–16; discussion 16–18.Google Scholar

Horgan, MA, Anderson, GJ, Kellogg, JX, Schwartz, MS, Spektor, S, McMenomey, SO, et al. Classification and quantification of the petrosal approach to the petroclival region. J Neurosurg. 2000;93(1):108–12.Google Scholar

Janjua, MB, Caruso, JP, Greenfield, JP, Souweidane, MM, Schwartz, TH. The combined transpetrosal approach: anatomic study and literature review. J Clin Neurosci. 2017;41:36–40.Google Scholar

Miller, CG, van Loveren, HR, Keller, JT, Pensak, M, el-Kalliny, M, Tew, JM Jr. Transpetrosal approach: surgical anatomy and technique. Neurosurgery. 1993;33(3):461–9; discussion 9.Google Scholar

Miller, ME, Mastrodimos, B, Cueva, RA. Facial nerve function after the extended translabyrinthine approach. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2015;76(1):1–6.Google Scholar

Yang, J, Zhang, F, Xu, A, Li, H, Ding, Z. Comparison of surgical exposure and maneuverability associated with microscopy and endoscopy in the retrolabyrinthine and transcrusal approaches to the retrochiasmatic region: a cadaveric study. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016;158(4):703–10.Google Scholar

Chang, SW, Wu, A, Gore, P, Beres, E, Porter, RW, Preul, MC, et al. Quantitative comparison of Kawase’s approach versus the retrosigmoid approach: implications for tumors involving both middle and posterior fossae. Neurosurgery. 2009;64(3 Suppl):ons44-51.Google Scholar

Mason, E, Rompaey, JV, Solares, CA, Figueroa, R, Prevedello, D. Subtemporal retrolabyrinthine (posterior petrosal) versus endoscopic endonasal approach to the petroclival region: an anatomical and computed tomography study. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2016;77(3):231–7.Google Scholar

Xu, F, Karampelas, I, Megerian, CA, Selman, WR, Bambakidis, NC. Petroclival meningiomas: an update on surgical approaches, decision making, and treatment results. Neurosurg Focus. 2013;35(6):E11.Google Scholar

House, WF, Hitselberger, WE. The transcochlear approach to the skull base. Arch Otolaryngol. 1976;102(6):334–42.Google Scholar

House, WF, De la Cruz, A, Hitselberger, WE. Surgery of the skull base: transcochlear approach to the petrous apex and clivus. Otolaryngology. 1978;86(5):ORL-770–9.Google Scholar

Little, AS, Jittapiromsak, P, Crawford, NR, Deshmukh, P, Preul, MC, Spetzler, RF, et al. Quantitative analysis of exposure of staged orbitozygomatic and retrosigmoid craniotomies for lesions of the clivus with supratentorial extension. Neurosurgery. 2008;62(5 Suppl 2):ons318–23; discussion ons23–4.Google Scholar

Siwanuwatn, R, Deshmukh, P, Figueiredo, EG, Crawford, NR, Spetzler, RF, Preul, MC. Quantitative analysis of the working area and angle of attack for the retrosigmoid, combined petrosal, and transcochlear approaches to the petroclival region. J Neurosurg. 2006;104(1):137–42.Google Scholar

Lemole, GM, Jr., Henn, JS, Zabramski, JM, Spetzler, RF. Modifications to the orbitozygomatic approach. Technical note. J Neurosurg. 2003;99(5):924–30.Google Scholar

Fujitsu, K, Kitsuta, Y, Takemoto, Y, Matsunaga, S, Tateishi, K. Combined pre- and retrosigmoid approach for petroclival meningiomas with the aid of a rotatable head frame: peri-auricular three-quarter twist-rotation approach: technical note. Skull Base. 2004;14(4):209–15.Google Scholar

Rehder, R, Cohen, AR. Endoscope-assisted microsurgical subtemporal keyhole approach to the posterolateral suprasellar region and basal cisterns. World Neurosurgery. 2017 Jul 1;103:114–21.Google Scholar

Felbaum, D, Syed, HR, Ryan, JE, Jean, WC, Anaizi, A. Endoscope-assisted combined supracerebellar infratentorial and endoscopic transventricular approach to the pineal region: a technical note. Cureus. 2016 Mar;8(3).Google Scholar

Taniguchi, M, Takimoto, H, Yoshimine, T, Shimada, N, Miyao, Y, Hirata, M, Maruno, M, Kato, A, Kohmura, E, Hayakawa, T. Application of a rigid endoscope to the microsurgical management of 54 cerebral aneurysms: results in 48 patients. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1999 Aug 1;91(2):231–7.Google Scholar

Russell, SM, JT Jr., Roland, Golfinos, JG. Retrolabyrinthine craniectomy: the unsung hero of skull base surgery. Skull Base. 2004 Feb;14(1):63.Google Scholar

Chotai, S, Liu, Y, Qi, S. Review of surgical anatomy of the tumors involving cavernous sinus. Asian Journal of Neurosurgery. 2018 Jan;13(1):1.Google Scholar

Yoon, N, Shah, A, Couldwell, WT, Kalani, MY, Park, MS. Preoperative embolization of skull base meningiomas: current indications, techniques, and pearls for complication avoidance. Neurosurgical Focus. 2018 Apr 1;44(4):E5.Google Scholar

Truong, HQ, Sun, X, Celtikci, E, Borghei-Razavi, H, Wang, EW, Snyderman, CH, Gardner, PA, Fernandez-Miranda, JC. Endoscopic anterior transmaxillary “transalisphenoid” approach to Meckel’s cave and the middle cranial fossa: an anatomical study and clinical application. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2018 Feb 2;130(1):227–37.Google Scholar

Terasaka, S, Asaoka, K, Kobayashi, H, Sugiyama, T, Yamaguchi, S. Dural opening/removal for combined petrosal approach. Skull Base. 2011 Mar;21(2):123.Google Scholar

Van Gompel, JJ, Alikhani, P, Youssef, AS, Van Loveren, HR, Boyev, KP, Agazzi, S. Anterior petrosectomy: consecutive series of 46 patients with attention to approach-related complications. Journal of Neurological Surgery. Part B, Skull Base. 2015 Sep;76(5):379.Google Scholar

Fernández-de Thomas, RJ, De Jesus, O. Craniotomy. InStatPearls, Jul 11, 2020. StatPearls Publishing.Google Scholar