Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-13T05:24:06.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Institutional Legacies: Understanding Multiparty Politics in Historical Perspective

from Part I - Institutional Foundations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2018

Rachel Beatty Riedl
Affiliation:
Northwestern University
Nic Cheeseman
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

The institutions of multiparty politics in Africa today have important causal implications for a variety of critical outcomes, such as the ability to build cross-ethnic coalitions; the stability or volatility, accountability and representativeness of elections; the extent and distribution of public services; the likelihood of authoritarian successor parties’ return to power; the durability of democracy itself; and even the very existence and salience of particular social cleavages. These contemporary formal institutions have, in some cases, been crafted de nouveau from upheaval and transition moments, but in other cases have evolved gradually out of pre-existing authoritarian-era institutions. However, even where new institutions have been crafted in the recent past from scratch, this has not occurred in a vacuum. The legacies of past struggles – modes of organisation and distribution of power and resources – have a significant influence on the possibilities for the future.

This chapter demonstrates the significance of past institutional configurations – harking back to the era of supposed ‘institutionless’ politics in Africa, or the reign of the informal – in shaping contemporary multiparty politics. In doing so, it makes two corrections to existing interpretations of the political landscape. First, it is common to assert that African political parties are weak, with the assumption that parties do not structure the electoral playing field. This is an error that has serious consequences for understanding contemporary politics. Political parties across the continent vary dramatically not only in their strength, but also in the forms of territorial organisation, resources and strategies of mobilisation, internal rotation mechanisms and abilities to thrive beyond a single candidate or term in power. This variation is a global phenomenon, and understanding how parties structure the political playing field (and to what extent) is an empirical question relevant in Africa just as it is in Europe, Latin America, Asia and beyond.

First, it is important to highlight the many robust political parties in Africa – including the Chama Cha Mapinduzi (CCM) in Tanzania, the African National Congress (ANC) in South Africa, the National Democratic Congress (NDC) and New Patriotic Party (NPP) in Ghana, and the Mozambique Liberation Front (Frelimo) in Mozambique. They have historically distinct roots – from nationalist parties fighting for independence to revolutionary, military or multiparty opposition parties. These divergent origins offer particular opportunities for citizen-linkage strategies and power contestation, and also constrain other opportunities for adaptation and regeneration in a changing environment.

Type
Chapter
Information
Institutions and Democracy in Africa
How the Rules of the Game Shape Political Developments
, pp. 41 - 60
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbink, Jan. 2010. ‘Political culture in Ethiopia: A balance sheet of post-1991 ethnically-based federalism’, Infosheet, Africa Studies Centre University of Leiden.
Arriola, Leonardo R. 2012. Multi-ethnic coalitions in Africa: Business financing of opposition election campaigns, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Linda J. 2008. Brokering democracy in Africa: The rise of clientelist democracy in Senegal, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogaards, Matthijs. 2008. ‘Dominant party systems and electoral volatility in Africa: A comment on Mozaffar and Scarritt’, Party Politics 14, 1: 113–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, Charles. 2007. ‘The emergence of parties and party systems’ in The Oxford handbook of comparative politics, Oxford University Press, 499–521.Google Scholar
Brownlee, Jason. 2007. Authoritarianism in an age of democratisation, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. 2004. Ethnicity without groups, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carbone, Giovanni. 2007. ‘Political parties and party systems in Africa: Themes and research perspectives’, World Political Science Review 3, 3: 1–29.Google Scholar
Chatham House Report. 2012. ‘Population Growth and Demographic Trends: Implications for African States and Regions’.
Cheeseman, Nic, Lynch, Gabrielle and Willis, Justin. 2015. ‘In Uganda many find it difficult to believe that Museveni could ever be defeated in an election’, The Washington Post, www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2015/11/03/can-anyone-defeat-president-yoweri-museveni-in-uganda/.
Chege, Michael, Nordlund, Per, and Rukambe, Jorame. 2007. Political parties in East Africa: Diversity in political party systems, Stockholm, Sweden: International IDEA.Google Scholar
Converse, Phillip E. 1969. ‘Of time and partisan stability’, Comparative Political Studies 2, 2: 139–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul and Powell, Walter W.. 1983. ‘The iron cage revisited: Collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organisational fields’, American Sociological Review 48, 2: 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elischer, Sebastian. 2013. Political parties in Africa: Ethnicity and party formation, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gyimah-Boadi, Emmanuel. 2008. ‘Modeling success, governance and institution-building in Africa: The case of Ghana's electoral commission’, Accra: Center for Democratic Development.
Huntington, Samuel. 1968. Political order in changing societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hyden, Goran. 2006. African politics in comparative perspective, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert and Kselman, Daniel M.. 2013. ‘Economic development, democratic experience, and political parties’ linkage strategies’, Comparative Political Studies 46, 11: 1453–1484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koter, Dominika. 2013. ‘King makers: Local leaders and ethnic politics in Africa’, World Politics 65, 2: 187–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laitin, David D. 1986. Hegemony and culture: Politics and change among the Yoruba, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
LeBas, Adrienne. 2011. From protest to parties: party-building and democratisation in Africa, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven R., and Way, Lucan A.. 2012. ‘Beyond patronage: Violent struggle, ruling party cohesion, and authoritarian durability’, Perspectives on Politics 10, 04: 869–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven R., and Way, Lucan A.. 2015. ‘Not just what, but when (and how): Comparative-historical approaches to authoritarian durability’ in Mahoney, J. and Thelen, K. (eds.), Advances in comparative-historical analysis, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lindberg, Staffan I., and Morrison, Minion K. C.. 2005. ‘Exploring voter alignments in Africa: Core and swing voters in Ghana’, The Journal of Modern African Studies 43, 4: 565–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLean, Lauren M. 2010. Informal institutions and citizenship in Rural Africa: Risk and reciprocity in Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz. 2006. Voting for autocracy: Hegemonic party survival and its demise in Mexico, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, James, and Thelen, Kathleen A. (eds.). 2010. Explaining institutional change: ambiguity, agency, and power, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James, and Thelen, Kathleen A. (eds.). 2015. Advances in Comparative-Historical Analysis, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Scully, Timothy (eds.). 1995. Building democratic institutions: Party systems in Latin America, Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
McCauley, J. F. 2013. ‘Africa's new big man rule? Pentecostalism and patronage in Ghana’, African Affairs 112, 446: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClendon, Gwenyth H., and Riedl, Rachel Beatty. 2015. ‘Individualism and empowerment in pentecostal sermons: New evidence from Nairobi, Kenya’, African Affairs 115, 458: 119–144.Google Scholar
Mengisteab, Kidane. 2001. ‘Ethiopia's ethnic-based federalism: 10 years after’, African Issues 29, ½: 20–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mozaffar, Shaheen, Scarritt, James R., and Galaich, Glen. 2003. ‘Electoral institutions, ethnopolitical cleavages, and party systems in Africa's emerging democracies’, American Political Science Review 97, 3: 379–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nohlen, D. 1984. ‘Changes and choices in electoral systems’, in Lijphart, A. and Grofman, B. (eds.) Choosing an electoral system: Issues and alternatives, New York: Praeger, 217–224.Google Scholar
NPP Report. 1993. The stolen verdict: Ghana, November 1992 presidential election: Report of the New Patriotic Party.
Pitcher, M. Anne. 2012. Party politics and economic reform in Africa's democracies, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, Daniel N. 2005. Institutions and ethnic politics in Africa, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randall, Vicky, and Svåsand, Lars. 2002. ‘Party institutionalization in new democracies’, Party Politics 8, 1: 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Resnick, Danielle. 2012. ‘Opposition parties and the urban poor in African democracies’, Comparative Political Studies 45, 11: 1351–1378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riedl, Rachel B. 2014. Authoritarian origins of democratic party systems in Africa, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riedl, Rachel B. 2016. ‘Strong Parties, Weak Parties: Divergent Pathways to Democracy in Sub-Saharan Africa’, In Bermeo, Nancy and Yashar, Deborah J., eds. Parties, Movements, and Democracy in the Developing World, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Salih, M. A. Mohamed. 2003. African political parties: Evolution, institutionalism and governance, Ann Arbor, MI: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Schickler, Eric. 2001. Disjointed pluralism: Institutional innovation and the development of the US Congress, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Slater, Dan. 2010. Ordering power: Contentious politics and authoritarian leviathans in Southeast Asia, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen. 2003. ‘How institutions evolve: Insights from comparative historical analysis’, in Mahoney, James and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich (eds.), Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences, Cambridge University Press, 208–240.Google Scholar
Van de Walle, Nicholas. 2003. ‘Presidentialism and clientelism in Africa's emerging party systems’, The Journal of Modern African Studies 41, 2: 297–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villalón, Leonardo A. 2006. Islamic society and state power in Senegal: Disciples and citizens in Fatick, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wahman, Michael. 2015. ‘Nationalized incumbents and regional challengers: Opposition- and incumbent-party nationalization in Africa’, Party Politics, 1–14.
Waldner, David. 2004. ‘Democracy and dictatorship in the post-colonial world’, Prepared for delivery at the 2004 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.
Weghorst, Keith R., and Bernhard, Michael. 2014. ‘From formlessness to structure? The institutionalization of competitive party systems in Africa’, Comparative Political Studies 47, 12: 1707–1737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×