Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T14:46:04.221Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 24 - The Use of Sperm in Medically Assisted Reproduction

from Section 4 - Treatment of Male Infertility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 July 2023

By
Susan Talamini  and
Gail S. Prins
Edited by
Larry I. Lipshultz ,
Stuart S. Howards ,
Craig S. Niederberger  and
Dolores J. Lamb
Larry I. Lipshultz
Affiliation:
Baylor College of Medicine, Texas
Stuart S. Howards
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Craig S. Niederberger
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Chicago
Dolores J. Lamb
Affiliation:
Weill Cornell Medical College, New York
Get access

Summary

Medically assisted reproduction (MAR) procedures require the processing of semen and sperm samples. There are several variables which can affect the quality of spermatozoa during the processing of sperm cells, which can, in turn, influence the outcomes of embryo development, pregnancy, and live births [1]. The objective of this chapter is to describe the various techniques utilized for processing human sperm in order to enrich for the best and most competent sperm used for MAR, including intrauterine insemination (IUI), in vitro fertilization (IVF), and intracytoplasmic sperm insemination (ICSI) [2, 3].

Type
Chapter
Information
Infertility in the Male , pp. 446 - 460
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Weidel, L, Prins, GS. Cryosurvival of human spermatozoa frozen in eight different buffer systems. J Androl 1987;8:41–7.Google Scholar
Centola, G, Jeyendran, RS. Sperm processing techniques. In: Lipshultz, LI, Howards, SS, Niederberger, CS, eds. Infertility in the Male, 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009; pp. 582–92.Google Scholar
Jeyendran, RS, Caroppo, E, Rouen, A, Anderson, A, Puscheck, E. Selecting the most competent sperm for assisted reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril 2019;111:851–63.Google Scholar
Schlegel, PN. What are the assisted reproductive technologies for male infertility? In: Robaire, B, Chan, P, eds. Handbook of Andrology, 2nd ed. East Dundee, IL: American Society of Andrology, 2008; pp. 62–6. Available from: www.andrologysociety.com/.Google Scholar
Byrd, W. Processing human semen for insemination comparison of methods. In: Centola, G, Ginsberg, KA, eds. Evaluation and Treatment of the Infertile Male. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996; pp. 89–107.Google Scholar
European Society for Human Reproduction. Revised guidelines for good practice in IVF laboratories. 2015 . Available from: www.eshre.eu/Guidelines-and-Legal/Guidelines/Revised-guidelines-for-good-practice-in-IVF-laboratories-(2015).aspx.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen, 5th ed. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2010.Google Scholar
Wald, M, Prins, G. Sperm banking: indications and techniques. In: Lipshultz, LI, Howards, SS, Niederberger, CS, eds. Infertility in the Male, 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009; pp. 593–602.Google Scholar
De Los Santos, MJ, Apter, S, Coticchio, G, et al. Revised guidelines for good practice in IVF laboratories (2015). Hum Reprod 2016;31:685–6.Google Scholar
Niederberger, CS. Male infertility. In: Wein, AJ, Kavoussi, LR, Partin, AW, Peters, CA, eds. Campbell-Walsh Urology. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier, 2016; pp. 556–79.Google Scholar
Jefferys, A, Siassakos, D, Wardle, P. The management of retrograde ejaculation: a systematic review and update. Fertil Steril 2012;97:306–12.e6.Google Scholar
Mullin, C, Stelling, J, Schoor, R. Intrauterine insemination from the urologist’s perspective. In: Lipshultz, LI, Howards, SS, Niederberger, CS, eds. Infertility in the Male, 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009; pp. 493–9.Google Scholar
Phipps, W. Assisted reproductive technology for male factor infertility. In: Centola, G, Ginsburg, KA, eds. Evaluation and Treatment of the Infertile Male. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996; pp. 130–55.Google Scholar
Morin, SJ, Scott, RT. Knowledge gaps in male infertility: a reproductive endocrinology and infertility perspective. Transl Androl Urol 2018;7(Suppl 3):S283–91.Google Scholar
Pagani, RL, Serafini, PC, Srougi, M. In-vitro fertilization and micromanipulation for male infertility. In: Lipshultz, LI, Howards, SS, Niederberger, CS, eds. Infertility in the Male, 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009; pp. 500–15.Google Scholar
Moolenaar, LM, Cissen, M, De Bruin, JP, et al. Cost-effectiveness of assisted conception for male subfertility. Reprod Biomed Online 2015;30:659–66.Google Scholar
Van Voorhis, BJ, Barnett, M, Sparks, AET, Syrop, CH, Rosenthal, G, Dawson, J. Effect of the total motile sperm count on the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of intrauterine insemination and in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2001;75:661–8.Google Scholar
Prins, GS, Dolgina, R, Studney, P, Kaplan, B, Ross, L, Niederberger, C. Quality of cryopreserved testicular sperm in patients with obstructive and nonobstructive azoospermia. J Urol 1999;161:1504–8.Google Scholar
Rothmann, S. What is sperm banking? When and how is it (or should it be) used in humans? Animals? In: Robaire, B, Chan, P, eds. Handbook of Andrology, 2nd ed. East Dundee, IL: American Society of Andrology, 2008; pp. 41–4. Available from: www.andrologysociety.com/.Google Scholar
Gliedt, D, Reed, M. Preparation of gametes for assisted reproductive technologies. In: Andrology and Embryology Review Course Manual. St Louis, MO: American Association of Bioanalysists, 2003; pp. 8.1–8.58.Google Scholar
Ruiz, A, Jeyendran, RS. Sperm processing procedure for intrauterine insemination. In: Yeyendran, RS, ed. Sperm Collection and Processing Methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003; pp. 123–40.Google Scholar
Centola, G. Sperm preparation for insemination. In: Patton, PE, Battaglia, DE, eds. Office Andrology. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 2005; pp. 39–52.Google Scholar
Said, TM, Grunewald, S, Paasch, U, et al. Advantage of combining magnetic cell separation with sperm preparation techniques. Reprod Biomed Online 2005;10:740–6.Google Scholar
Malvezzi, H, Sharma, R, Agarwal, A, Abuzenadah, AM, Abu-Elmagd, M. Sperm quality after density gradient centrifugation with three commercially available media: a controlled trial. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2014;12:1–7.Google Scholar
Allamaneni, SSR, Agrawal, A, Rama, S, Ranganathan, P, Sharma, RK. Comparative study on density gradients and swim-up preparation techniques utilizing neat and cryopreserved spermatozoa. Asian J Androl 2005;7:86–92.Google Scholar
Henkel, RR, Schill, WB. Sperm preparation for ART. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2003;1:1–22.Google Scholar
Oshio, S, Kaneko, S, Lizuka, R, Mohri, H. Effects of gradient centrifugation on human sperm. Arch Androl 1987;19:85–93.Google Scholar
Enciso, M, Iglesias, M, Galán, I, Sarasa, J, Gosálvez, A, Gosálvez, J. The ability of sperm selection techniques to remove single- or double-strand DNA damage. Asian J Androl 2011;13:764–8.Google Scholar
Zorn, B, Vidmar, G, Meden-Vrtovec, H. Seminal reactive oxygen species as predictors of fertilization, embryo quality and pregnancy rates after conventional in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Int J Androl 2003;26:279–85.Google Scholar
Takeshima, T, Yumura, Y, Kuroda, S, Kawahara, T, Uemura, H, Iwasaki, A. Effect of density gradient centrifugation on reactive oxygen species in human semen. Syst Biol Reprod Med 2017;63:192–8.Google Scholar
Ahelik, A, Mändar, R, Korrovits, P, et al. Systemic oxidative stress could predict assisted reproductive technique outcome. J Assist Reprod Genet 2015;32:699–704.Google Scholar
Yumura, Y, Iwasaki, A, Saito, K, Ogawa, T, Hirokawa, M. Effect of reactive oxygen species in semen on the pregnancy of infertile couples. Int J Urol 2009;16:202–7.Google Scholar
Boomsma, CM, Heineman, MJ, Cohlen, BJ, Farquhar, C. Semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;4:CD004507.Google Scholar
Jeyendran, RS, Perez-Pelaez, M, Crabo, BG. Concentration of viable spermatozoa for artificial insemination. Fertil Steril 1986;45:132–4Google Scholar
Henkel, RR, Franken, DR, Lombard, CJ, Schill, WB. Selective capacity of glass-wool filtration for the separation of human spermatozoa with condensed chromatin: a possible therapeutic modality for male-factor cases? J Assist Reprod Genet 1994;11:395–400.Google Scholar
Sterzik, K, De Santo, M, Uhlich, S, Gagsteiger, F, Strehler, E. Glass wool filtration leads to a higher percentage of spermatozoa with intact acrosomes: an ultrastructural analysis. Hum Reprod 1998;13:2506–11.Google Scholar
Larson, KL, Brannian, JD, Timm, BK, Jost, LK, Evenson, DP. Density gradient centrifugation and glass wool filtration of semen remove spermatozoa with damaged chromatin structure. Hum Reprod 1999;14:2015–19.Google Scholar
Johnson, DE, Confino, E, Jeyendran, RS. Glass wool column filtration versus mini-Percoll gradient for processing poor quality semen samples. Fertil Steril 1996;66:459–62.Google Scholar
Van Der Ven, HH, Jeyendran, RS, Al-hasani, S, et al. Glass wool column filtration of human semen: relation to swim-up procedure and outcome of IVF. Hum Reprod 1988;3:85–8.Google Scholar
Tanphaichitr, N, Randall, M, Fitzgerald, L, Lee, G, Seibel, M, Taymor, M. An increase in in vitro fertilization ability of low-density human sperm capacitated by multiple-tube swim-up. Fertil Steril 1987;48:821–7.Google Scholar
Andolz, P, Bielsa, M, Genesca, A, Benet, J, Egozcue, J. Improvement of sperm quality in abnormal semen samples using a modified swim-up procedure. Hum Reprod 1987;2:99–101.Google Scholar
Calamera, J, Brugo, S, Quiros, M, Nicholson, R. Computer assisted measurement in normal and pathological human semen, fresh and post swim-up technique. Andrologia 1989;21:340–5.Google Scholar
Yetkinel, S, Kilicdag, EB, Aytac, PC, Haydardedeoglu, B, Simsek, E, Cok, T. Effects of the microfluidic chip technique in sperm selection for intracytoplasmic sperm injection for unexplained infertility: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. J Assist Reprod Genet 2019;36:403–9.Google Scholar
Bower, L, Serafini, P, Wikland, M, Moyer, D. The use of hyaluronic acid for sperm selection – evaluation of sperm head ultrastructure. Int J Fertil 1989;34:420–4.Google Scholar
Barak, Y, Amit, A, Lessing, J, Paz, G, Homonnai, T, Yogey, L. Improved fertilization rate in an in-vitro fertilization program by egg yolk treated sperm. Fertil Steril 1992;58:197–8.Google Scholar
Holmgren, WJ, Jeyendran, RS, Neff, MR, Perez-Pelaez, M, Zaneveld, LJD. Preincubation of human spermatozoa in test-yolk medium: effect on penetration of zona-free hamster oocytes and correlation with other semen characteristics. J Vitr Fertil Embryo Transf 1989;6:207–12.Google Scholar
Jeyendran, RS, Gunawardana, VK, Barisic, D, Wentz, AC. TEST-yolk media and sperm quality. Hum Reprod Update 1995;1:73–9.Google Scholar
Bielfeld, P, Jeyendran, RS, Holmgren, WJ, Zaneveld, LJD. Effect of egg yolk medium on the acrosome reaction of human spermatozoa. J Androl 1990;11:260–9.Google Scholar
Yang, YS, Rojas, FJ, Stone, SC. Acrosome reaction of human spermatozoa in zona-free hamster egg penetration test. Fertil Steril 1988;50:954–9.Google Scholar
Ericsson, R, Langevin, C, Nishino, M. Isolation of fractions rich in human Y sperm. Nature 1973;246:421.Google Scholar
Janson, J-C. On the history of the development of Sephadex. Chromatographia 1987;23:361–5.Google Scholar
Byrd, W, Drobnis, E, Kutteh, W, Marshburn, P, Carr, B. Intrauterine insemination with frozen donor sperm: a prospective randomized trial comparing three different sperm preparation techniques. Fertil Steril 1994;62:850–6.Google Scholar
Amer, M, Metawae, B, Hosny, H, Raef, A. Beneficial effect of adding pentoxifylline to processed semen samples on ICSI outcome in infertile males with mild and moderate asthenozoospermia: a randomized controlled prospective crossover study. Int J Reprod Biomed 2013;11:939–44.Google Scholar
Negri, P, Grechi, E, Tomasi, A, Fabbri, E, Capuzzo, A. Effectiveness of pentoxifylline in semen preparation for intrauterine insemination. Hum Reprod 1996;11:1236–9.Google Scholar
Imoedemhe, DAG, Sigue, AB, Pacpaco, ELA, Olazo, AB. The effect of caffeine on the ability of spermatozoa to fertilize mature human oocytes. J Assist Reprod Genet 1992;9:155–60.Google Scholar
Moghadam, KK, Nett, R, Robins, JC, et al. The motility of epididymal or testicular spermatozoa does not directly affect IVF/ICSI pregnancy outcomes. J Androl 2005;26:619–23.Google Scholar
Zhang, W, Li, F, Cao, H, Li, C. Protective effects of l-carnitine on astheno- and normozoospermic human semen samples during cryopreservation. Zygote 2016;24:293–300.Google Scholar
Yang, C, Xu, L, Cui, Y, Wu, B, Liao, Z. Potent humanin analogue (HNG) protects human sperm from freeze-thaw-induced damage. Cryobiology 2019;88:47–53.Google Scholar
Saeednia, S, Shabani Nashtaei, M, Bahadoran, H, Aleyasin, A, Amidi, F. Effect of nerve growth factor on sperm quality in asthenozoospermic men during cryopreservation. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2016;14:1–8.Google Scholar
Zhang, X, Lu, X, Li, J, Xia, Q, Gao, J, Wu, B. Mito-Tempo alleviates cryodamage by regulating intracellular oxidative metabolism in spermatozoa from asthenozoospermic patients. Cryobiology 2019;91:18–22.Google Scholar
Bartoov, B, Berkovitz, A, Eltes, F, Kogosowski, A, Menezo, Y, Barak, Y. Real-time fine morphology of motile human sperm cells is associated with IVF-ICSI outcome. J Androl 2001;23:1–8.Google Scholar
Rappa, KL, Rodriguez, HF, Hakkarainen, GC, Anchan, RM, Mutter, GL, Asghar, W. Sperm processing for advanced reproductive technologies: where are we today? Biotechnol Adv 2016;34:578–87.Google Scholar
Bartoov, B, Berkovitz, A, Eltes, F, et al. Pregnancy rates are higher with intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection than with conventional intracytoplasmic injection. Fertil Steril 2003;80:1413–19.Google Scholar
Teixeira, DM, Barbosa, MAP, Ferriani, RA, et al. Regular (ICSI) versus ultra-high magnification (IMSI) sperm selection for assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;7:CD010167.Google Scholar
Huszar, G, Jakab, A, Sakkas, D, et al. Fertility testing and ICSI sperm selection by hyaluronic acid binding: clinical and genetic aspects. Reprod Biomed Online 2007;14:650–63.Google Scholar
Parmegiani, L, Cognigni, GE, Bernardi, S, Troilo, E, Ciampaglia, W, Filicori, M. “Physiologic ICSI”: Hyaluronic acid (HA) favors selection of spermatozoa without DNA fragmentation and with normal nucleus, resulting in improvement of embryo quality. Fertil Steril 2010;93:598–604.Google Scholar
Miller, D, Pavitt, S, Sharma, V, et al. Physiological, hyaluronan-selected intracytoplasmic sperm injection for infertility treatment (HABSelect): a parallel, two-group, randomised trial. Lancet 2019;393:416–22.Google Scholar
Liu, Y, Feenan, K, Chapple, V, Roberts, P. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection using hyaluronic acid or polyvinylpyrrolidone: a time-lapse sibling oocyte study. Hum Fertil 2017;22:39–45.Google Scholar
Smith, GD, Takayama, S. Application of microfluidic technologies to human assisted reproduction. Mol Hum Reprod 2017;23:257–68.Google Scholar
Yetkinel, S, Kilicdag, EB, Aytac, PC, Haydardedeoglu, B, Simsek, E, Cok, T. Effects of the microfluidic chip technique in sperm selection for intracytoplasmic sperm injection for unexplained infertility: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. J Assist Reprod Genet 2019;36:403–9.Google Scholar
Stanger, JD, Vo, L, Yovich, JL, Almahbobi, G. Hypo-osmotic swelling test identifies individual spermatozoa with minimal DNA fragmentation. Reprod Biomed Online 2010;21:474–84.Google Scholar
Pang, MG, You, YA, Park, YJ, Oh, SA, Kim, DS, Kim, YJ. Numerical chromosome abnormalities are associated with sperm tail swelling patterns. Fertil Steril 2010;94:1012–20.Google Scholar
Rouen, A, Carlier, L, Heide, S, et al. Potential selection of genetically balanced spermatozoa based on the hypo-osmotic swelling test in chromosomal rearrangement carriers. Reprod Biomed Online 2017;35:372–8.Google Scholar
Tsai, YL, Liu, J, Garcia, JE, Katz, E, Compton, G, Baramki, TA. Establishment of an optimal hypo-osmotic swelling test by examining single spermatozoa in four different hypo-osmotic solutions. Hum Reprod 1997;12:1111–13.Google Scholar
Jeyendran, RS, Van der Ven, HH, Zaneveld, LJD. The hypoosmotic swelling test: an update. Syst Biol Reprod Med 1992;29:105–16.Google Scholar
Coetzee, K, Kruger, TF, Menkveld, R, Lombard, CJ, Swanson, RJ. Hypoosmotic swelling test in the prediction of male fertility. Syst Biol Reprod Med 1989;23:131–8.Google Scholar
Nordhoff, V. How to select immotile but viable spermatozoa on the day of intracytoplasmic sperm injection? An embryologist’s view. Andrology 2015;3:156–62.Google Scholar
Mulhall, JP, Burgess, CM, Cunningham, D, Carson, R, Harris, D, Oates, RD. Presence of mature sperm in testicular parenchyma of men with nonobstructive azoospermia: prevalence and predictive factors. Urology 1997;49:91–5.Google Scholar
Oates, RD, Mulhall, J, Burgess, C, Cunningham, D, Carson, R. Fertilization and pregnancy using intentionally cryopreserved testicular tissue as the sperm source for intracytoplasmic sperm injection in 10 men with nonobstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod 1997;12:734–9.Google Scholar
Wald, M, Ross, LS, Prins, GS, Cieslak-Janzen, J, Wolf, G, Niederberger, CS. Analysis of outcomes of cryopreserved surgically retrieved sperm for IVF/ICSI. J Androl 2006;27:60–5.Google Scholar
Habermann, H, Seo, R, Cieslak, J, Niederberger, C, Prins, GS, Ross, L. In vitro fertilization outcomes after intracytoplasmic sperm injection with fresh or frozen-thawed testicular spermatozoa. Fertil Steril 2000;73:955–60.Google Scholar
Prins, GS, Weidel, L. A comparative study of buffer systems as cryoprotectants for human spermatozoa. Fertil Steril 1986;46:147–9.Google Scholar
Sawetawan, C, Bruns, ES, Prins, GS. Improvement of post-thaw sperm motility in poor quality human semen. Fertil Steril 1993;60:706–10.Google Scholar
Fiser, P, Fairfull, RW. The effects of rapid cooling (cold shock) of ram semen, photoperiod, and egg yolk in diluents on the survival of spermatozoa before and after freezing. Cryobiology 1986;23:518–24.Google Scholar
Hotaling, J, Wen, J, Belmonte, J, Niederberger, C, Prins, GS. 2034 polymerized alginic acid bead and sperm injection through micro-manipulation as a vehicle for cryopreservation and recovery of small numbers of human sperm. J Urol 2013;189(Suppl 4S):e835.Google Scholar
Coetzee, K, Ozgur, K, Berkkanoglu, M, Bulut, H, Isikli, A. Reliable single sperm cryopreservation in Cell Sleepers for azoospermia management. Andrologia 2016;48:203–10.Google Scholar
Kathrins, M, Abhyankar, N, Shoshany, O, et al. Post-thaw recovery of rare or very low concentrations of cryopreserved human sperm. Fertil Steril 2017;107:1300–4.Google Scholar
Kramer, RY, Garner, DL, Bruns, ES, Ericsson, SA, Prins, GS. Comparison of motility and flow cytometric assessments of seminal quality in fresh, 24‐hour extended and cryopreserved human spermatozoa. J Androl 1993;14:374–84.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×