Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T13:09:18.597Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction

Between Words and Walls: Material and Textual Approaches to Housing in the Graeco-Roman World

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 July 2022

By
Richard Alston ,
J. A. Baird  and
April Pudsey
Edited by
J. A. Baird  and
April Pudsey
J. A. Baird
Affiliation:
Birkbeck College, University of London
April Pudsey
Affiliation:
Manchester Metropolitan University
Get access

Summary

This introduction probes the relationship between textual and material approaches to houses of the ancient Mediterranean. Drawing on the contributions to the volume, it traces some of the ways in which documentary and archaeological sources, and the relationships between these, have shaped our knowledge of the housing and households of the Graeco-Roman world.

Keywords

Classical archaeologyhousehold archaeologyGraeco-Roman housingcultural biographymicrohistory
Type
Chapter
Information
Housing in the Ancient Mediterranean World
Material and Textual Approaches
 , pp. 1 - 26
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, P. M. (1999a). Labels for ladles: interpreting the material culture of Roman households. In Allison, P. M., ed., The Archaeology of Household Activities. London and New York: Routledge, 57–77.Google Scholar
Allison, P. M. (1999b). Introduction. In Allison, P. M., ed., The Archaeology of Household Activities. London and New York: Routledge, 1–18.Google Scholar
Allison, P. M. (2001). Using the material and written sources: turn of the millennium approaches to Roman domestic space. American Journal of Archaeology 105, 181–208.Google Scholar
Allison, P. M. (2004). Pompeian Households: An Analysis of the Material Culture. Los Angeles: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology.Google Scholar
Allison, P. M. (2007). Domestic spaces and activities. In Dobbins, J. J. and Foss, P. W., eds., The World of Pompeii. London and New York: Routledge, 269–78.Google Scholar
Alston, R. (1997). Houses and households in Roman Egypt. In. Laurence, R. and Wallace-Hadrill, A., eds., Domestic Space in the Roman World: Pompeii and Beyond. Portsmouth, RI: Journal of Roman Archaeology, 25–39.Google Scholar
Alston, R. (2001). The population of Late Roman Egypt and the end of the Ancient world. In Scheidel, W., ed., Debating Roman Demography. Leiden, Boston and Köln: Brill, 161–204.Google Scholar
Alston, R. (forthcoming). Modes of production and reproduction in Egyptian villages. In Barrett, C. and Carrington, J. C., eds., Households in Context: Dwelling in Ptolemaic and Roman Egypt. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, B. (2006). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Andrén, A. (1998). Between Artifacts and Texts: Historical Archaeology in Global Perspective. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Ardener, S. (ed.) (1993). Women and Space: Ground Rules and Social Maps, 2nd ed. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Ault, B. A. and Nevett, L. C. (eds.) (2005). Ancient Greek Houses and Households: Chronological, Regional, and Social Diversity. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Bagnall, R. (1992). Landholding in Late Roman Egypt: the distribution of wealth. Journal of Roman Studies 82, 128–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagnall, R. (1995). Reading Papyri, Writing Ancient History. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Baird, J. A. (2007). The bizarre bazaar: early excavations in the Roman East and problems of nomenclature. In Croxford, B., Ray, N., Roth, R. and White, N., eds., TRAC’06: Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference Proceedings, Oxford: Oxbow, 34–42.Google Scholar
Baird, J. A. (2014). The Inner Lives of Ancient Houses: An Archaeology of Dura-Europos. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, H. D. (2010). The social dimensions of Babylonian domestic architecture in the Neo-Babylonian and Achaemenid periods. In Curtis, J. and Simpson, S. J., eds., The World of Achaemenid Persia. History, Art and Society in Iran and the Ancient Near East. London: I.B. Tauris, 179–94.Google Scholar
Banaji, J. (2001). Agrarian Change in Late Antiquity: Gold, Labour, and Aristocratic Dominance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bassi, K. (2011). Seeing the past/reading the past. Image & Narrative 12, 29–50.Google Scholar
Berry, J. (1997). The conditions of domestic life in Pompeii in AD 79: a case-study of Houses 11 and 12, Insula 9, Region I. Papers of the British School at Rome 65, 103–25.Google Scholar
Bintliff, J. (1991). The contribution of an Annaliste/structural history approach to archaeology. In Bintliff, J., ed., The Annales School and Archaeology. Leicester: University of Leicester Press, 1–33.Google Scholar
Bloch, M. (1939). La société féodale: La formation des liens de dépendance. Paris: Albin Michel.Google Scholar
Blok, A. (1974). The Mafia of a Sicilian Village, 1860–1960: A Study of Violent Peasant Entrepreneurs. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Blok, A. (2001). Honour and Violence. Malden, MA: Polity.Google Scholar
Boozer, A. L. (2010). Memory and microhistory of an Empire: domestic contexts in Roman Amheida, Egypt. In Borić, D., ed., Archaeology and Memory. Oxford: Oxbow, 138–57.Google Scholar
Boozer, A. L. (2011). Forgetting to remember in the Dakleh Oasis, Egypt. In Bommas, M., ed., Cultural Memory and Identity in Ancient Societies. London: Continuum, 109–26.Google Scholar
Boozer, A. L. (2012). Globalizing Mediterranean identities: the overlapping spheres of Egyptian, Greek and Roman worlds at Trimithis. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology 25.2, 219–42Google Scholar
Boozer, A. L. (2014). Amheida II: A Late Romano-Egyptian House in the Dakhla Oasis: Amheida House B2. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Bowman, A. (1985). Landholding in the Hermopolite Nome in the fourth century A.D. Journal of Roman Studies 75, 137–63.Google Scholar
Braudel, F. (1966). La Méditerranée et le monde méditerranéen à l’époque de Philippe II, 2nd ed. Paris: Librairie Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Burke, P. (1990). The French Historical Revolution: The Annales School, 1929–89. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Cairns, D. (2011). Honour and shame: modern controversies and ancient values. Critical Quarterly 53, 23–41.Google Scholar
Carandini, A. (1986). Domus e insulae sulla pendice settentrionale del Palatino. Bullettino della Commissione Archeologica comunale di Roma 91, 263–78.Google Scholar
Carucci, M. (2012). The construction/deconstruction of the cubiculum: an example from the villa of maternus at Carranque (Spain). Oxford Journal of Archaeology 31, 213–24.Google Scholar
Castrén, P. (1975). Ordo populusque Pompeianus: Polity and Society in Roman Pompeii. Rome: Bardi.Google Scholar
Chakrabarty, D. (1997). The difference – deferral of a colonial modernity: public debates on domesticity in British Bengal. In Cooper, F. and Stoler, A. L., eds., Tensions of Empire. Colonial Cultures in a Bourgeois World, Berkeley: University of California Press, 373–405.Google Scholar
Clark, S. (1985). The Annales Historians. In Skinner, Q. ed., The Return of Grand Theory in the Human Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 177–98.Google Scholar
Cohen, D. (1989). Seclusion, separation, and the status of women in Classical Athens. Greece & Rome 36, 3–15.Google Scholar
Cooper, F. (2005). Postcolonial studies and the study of History. In Loomba, A., ed., Postcolonial Studies and Beyond. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 401–22.Google Scholar
Cowell, F. R. (1961). Everyday Life in Ancient Rome. London: B.T. Batsford.Google Scholar
Cristofani, M. (ed.). 1990. La grande Roma dei Tarquini, Rome: “L’Erma” di Bretschneider.Google Scholar
Cuomo, S. and Formisano, M., eds., 2016. Vitruvius: Text, Architecture, Reception. Arethusa 49.2. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 121–391.Google Scholar
Davidoff, L. and Hall, C. (2002). Family Fortunes: Men and Women of the English Middle Class, 1780–1850. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Davidson, J., (2011). Bodymaps: sexing space and zoning gender in Ancient Athens. Gender & History 23, 597–614.Google Scholar
de Certeau, M. (1984). The Practice of Everyday Life, trans. Rendall, Steven. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Dyson, S. L. (1995). Is there a text in this site? In Hall, D. B., ed., Methods in the Mediterranean: Historical and Archaeological Views on Texts and Archaeology. Leiden: Brill, 25–44.Google Scholar
Dyson, S. L. (2006). In Pursuit of Ancient Pasts: A History of Classical Archaeology in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, S. P. (2000). Roman Housing. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Fay, M. A. (2012). Unveiling the Harem: Elite Women and the Paradox of Seclusion in Eighteenth-Century Cairo. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. and Spentzou, E. (2018). The Production of Space in Latin Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gellner, E. (2008). Nations and Nationalism, 2nd ed. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gilmore, D. (ed.) (1986). Honor and Shame and the Unity of the Mediterranean. Washington, DC: American Anthropological Association.Google Scholar
Goldberg, M. Y. (1999). Spatial and behavioural negotiation in Classical Athenian city houses. In Allison, P. M., ed., The Archaeology of Household Activities. London and New York: Routledge, 142–61.Google Scholar
Goody, J. (1983). The Development of the Family and Marriage in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gosden, C., and Marshall, Y. (1999). The cultural biography of objects. World Archaeology 31, 169–78.Google Scholar
Gunn, S. (2007). The Public Culture of the Victorian Middle Class: Ritual and Authority in the English Industrial City 1840–1914. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1991). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society (translated by Thomas Burger with the assistance of Frederick Lawrence). Cambridge, MA: Polity.Google Scholar
Hales, S. (2003). The Roman House and Social Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, C. (2007). Of gender and empire: reflections on the nineteenth century. In Levine, P., ed., Gender and Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 46–75.Google Scholar
Hall, C. and Rose, S. O. (2006). Introduction: being at home with the empire. In Hall, C. and Rose, S. O., eds., At Home with the Empire: Metropolitan Culture and the Imperial World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–31.Google Scholar
Harsgor, M. (1978). Total History: the Annales school. Journal of Contemporary History 13: 1–13.Google Scholar
Helly, D. O. and Reverby, S. (eds.) (1992). Gendered Domains: Rethinking Public and Private in Women’s History. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Herzfeld, M. (1987). Anthropology through the Looking-Glass: Critical Ethnography in the Margins of Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Highmore, B. (2002). The Everyday Life Reader. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hoepfner, W. and Schwander, E.-L. (1994). Haus und Stadt im klassischen Griechenland. Munich: Deutscher Kunstverlag.Google Scholar
Horden, P. and Purcell, N. (1999). The Corrupting Sea: A Study of Mediterranean History. Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
Husson, G. (1983). Oikia: Le vocabulaire de la maison privée en Égypte d’après les papyrus grecs. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne.Google Scholar
Jameson, M. H. (1990a). Domestic space in the Greek city state. In Kent, S., ed., Domestic Architecture and the Use of Space: An Interdisciplinary Cross-cultural Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 92–113.Google Scholar
Jameson, M. H. (1990b). Private space and the Greek city. In Murray, O. and Price, S., eds., The Greek City from Homer to Alexander. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 171–95.Google Scholar
Jusdanis, G. (1991). Belated Modernity and Aesthetic Culture: Inventing National Tradition: Inventing National Literature. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Jusdanis, G. (2001). The Necessary Nation. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kopytoff, I. (1986). The cultural biographies of objects: commoditization as process. In Appadurai, A., ed., The Social Life of Things. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 64–91.Google Scholar
Leach, E. W. (1997). Oecus on Ibycus: investigating the vocabulary of the Roman house. In Bon, S. E. and Jones, R., eds., Sequence and Space in Pompeii. Oxford: Oxbow, 50–72.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, H. (1991). Critique of Everyday Life, Volume 1: Introduction. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, H. (2004). Rhythmanalysis: Space, Time, and Everyday Life. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Lewis, R. (2004). Rethinking Orientalism: Women, Travel and the Ottoman Harem. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Lucas, G. (2008) Time and archaeological event. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 18, 59–65.Google Scholar
Maiuri, A. (1929). Pompeii. Rome: Istituto geografico de Agostini.Google Scholar
Maiuri, A. (1942). L’ultima fase edilizia di Pompei. Rome: Istituto di studi romani.Google Scholar
Mímisson, K. and Magnússon, S. G. (2014) Singularizing the past: the history and archaeology of the small and ordinary. Journal of Social Archaeology 14, 131–56.Google Scholar
Mitchell, T. (1991). Colonising Egypt. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. (2010). The Classical Greek House. Exeter: Bristol Phoenix Press.Google Scholar
Mouritsen, H. (1988). Elections, Magistrates and Municipal Élite: Studies in Pompeian Epigraphy. Rome: Analecta Romani Instituti Danici Suppl. 15.Google Scholar
Mouritsen, H. (1997). Mobility and social change in Italian towns during the Principate. In Parkin, H., ed., Roman Urbanism: Beyond the Consumer City. London and New York: Routledge, 59–82.Google Scholar
Nevett, L. C. (1995). Gender relations in the Classical Greek household: the archaeological evidence. Annual of the British School at Athens 90, 363–81.Google Scholar
Nevett, L. C. (1999). House and Society in the Ancient Greek World. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nevett, L. C. (2010). Domestic Space in Classical Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nevett, L. C. (2011). Towards a female topography of the Ancient Greek city: case studies from Late Archaic and Early Classical Athens (c.520–400 bce). Gender & History 23, 576–96.Google Scholar
Noorani, Y. (2010). Normative notions of public and private in early Islamic culture. In Booth, M., ed., Harem Histories: Envisioning Places and Living Spaces. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 49–68.Google Scholar
Nora, P. (1997). Les lieux de mémoire. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Quennell, M. and Quennell, C. H. B. (1952). Everyday Life in Roman Britain. London: B.T. Batsford.Google Scholar
Richardson, L. (1988). Pompeii: An Architectural History. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Riggsby, A. M. (1997). ‘Public’ and ‘private’ in Roman culture: the case of the cubiculum. Journal of Roman Archaeology 10, 36–56.Google Scholar
Roberts, P. (2013). Life and Death in Pompeii and Herculaneum. London: British Museum Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, D. M. (1930). Excavations at Olynthus II: Architecture and Sculpture: Houses and Other Buildings. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, D. M. (1946). Excavations at Olynthus XII: Domestic and Public Architecture. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, D. M. and Graham, J. W. (1938). Excavations at Olynthus VIII: The Hellenic House. A Study of the Houses Found at Olynthus with a Detailed Account of Those Excavated in 1931 and 1934. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Sauer, E. W. (2004). The disunited subject. Human History’s split into ‘history’ and ‘archaeology’. In Sauer, E., ed., Archaeology and Ancient History, Breaking Down the Boundaries. London: Routledge, 17–45.Google Scholar
Smith, A. D. (2004). The Antiquity of Nations. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Smith, J. T. (1997). Roman Villas: A Study in Social Structures. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Speksnijder, S.A. (2015). Beyond ‘public’ and ‘private’: accessibility and visibility during salutations. In Tuori, K. and Nissin, L., eds., Public and Private in the Roman House and Society. Portsmouth, RI: Journal of Roman Archaeology, 87–99.Google Scholar
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (1999). The world their household: changing meanings of the domestic sphere in the nineteenth century. In Allison, P.M., ed., The Archaeology of Household Activities. London: Routledge, 162–89.Google Scholar
Stoler, A. L. (1995). Race and the Education of Desire: Foucault’s History of Sexuality and the Colonial Order of Things. Durham, NC, and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Stoler, A. L. and Cooper, F. (1997). Between metropole and colony: rethinking a research agenda. In Cooper, F. and Stoler, A. L., eds., Tensions of Empire: Colonial Cultures in a Bourgeois World. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1–56.Google Scholar
Thébert, Y. (1987). Private life and domestic architecture in Roman Africa. In A History of Private Life, Volume I: From Pagan Rome to Byzantium. London: Harvard University Press, 313–409.Google Scholar
Tosh, J. (1999). A Man’s Place: Masculinity and the Middle Class Home in Victorian England. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Trümper, M. (1998). Wohnen in Delos: eine baugeschichtliche Untersuchung zum Wandel der Wohnkultur in hellenistischer Zeit. Rahden: Leidorf.Google Scholar
Walker, S. (1983). Women and housing in Classical Greece: the archaeological evidence. In Cameron, A. and Kuhrt, A., eds., Images of Women in Antiquity, London: Routledge, 81–91.Google Scholar
Walkowitz, Judith R. (1992). City of Dreadful Delight: Narratives of Sexual Danger in Late-Victorian London. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. (1988). The social structure of the Roman house. Papers of the British School at Rome 56, 43–97.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. (1997). Mutatio Morum: the idea of a cultural revolution. In Habinek, T. and Schiesaro, A., eds., The Roman Cultural Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–22.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. (2007). The development of the Campanian House. In Dobbins, J. J. and Foss, P. W., eds., The World of Pompeii. London and New York: Routledge, 279–91.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. (2008). Rome’s Cultural Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. (2015). What makes a Roman house a ‘Roman house’? In Tuori, K. and Nissin, L., eds., Public and Private in the Roman House and Society. Portsmouth, RI: Journal of Roman Archaeology, 177–86.Google Scholar
Webster, T. B. L. (1969). Everyday Life in Classical Athens. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Wiegand, T. and Schrader, H. (1904). Priene: Ergebnisse der Ausgrabungen und Untersuchungen in den Jahren 1895–1898. Berlin: Georg Reimer.Google Scholar
Zanker, P. (1998). Pompeii: Public and Private Life, trans. D. L. Schneider. Cambridge, MA, and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×