Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T10:38:12.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - The Delphi Syndrome: Using History in the Social Sciences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 December 2022

By
Stathis N. Kalyvas  and
Daniel Fedorowycz
Edited by
Richard Bourke  and
Quentin Skinner
Richard Bourke
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Quentin Skinner
Affiliation:
Queen Mary University of London
Get access

Summary

We discuss how three social science disciplines, economics, sociology, and political science approach history and we contrast them to history as practiced by historians. We find that the drive to identify broadly generalizable causal effects, driven by the desire to predict and shape the future (the “Delphi syndrome”), frequently prompts social scientists to use history in a way that neglects the historians’ valuable insights. At the same time, the recent methodological developments in econometric techniques that have spread through the three disciplines place enormous, often unrealistic, historical demands on social scientists. We illustrate these issues by discussing several examples and we conclude by arguing that a way ahead consists in approaching the relation between idiographic and nomothetic research principles as one that approximates a continuum rather than a dichotomy.

Keywords

Political sciencehistoryeconometrics
Type
Chapter
Information
History in the Humanities and Social Sciences , pp. 116 - 140
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abadie, A. 2021. ‘Using Synthetic Controls: Feasibility, Data Requirements, and Methodological Aspects’, Journal of Economic Literature, 59: 2, pp. 391–425.Google Scholar
Abadie, A. and Gardeazabal, J.. 2003. ‘The Economic Costs of Conflict: A Case Study of the Basque Country’, American Economic Review, 93: 1, pp. 113–32.Google Scholar
Angrist, J. D. and Pischke, J.. 2010. ‘The Credibility Revolution in Empirical Economics: How Better Research Design is Taking the Con out of Econometrics’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24: 2, pp. 3–30.Google Scholar
Asimov, I. 1951. Foundation. New York.Google Scholar
Berlin, I. 1980. ‘Alleged Relativism in Eighteenth-Century European Thought’, British Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies, 3, pp. 89–106.Google Scholar
Boix, C. 2003. Democracy and Redistribution. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burawoy, M. 1989. ‘Two Methods in Search of Science: Skocpol versus Trotsky’, Theory and Society, 18: 6, pp. 759–805.Google Scholar
Capoccia, G. and Kelemen, R. D.. 2007. ‘The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narrative, and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism’, World Politics, 59: 3, pp. 341–69.Google Scholar
Capoccia, G. and Ziblatt, D.. 2010. ‘The Historical Turn in Democratization Studies’, Comparative Political Studies, 43: 8–9, pp. 931–68.Google Scholar
Chandra, K. and García-Ponce, O.. 2019. ‘Why Ethnic Subaltern-Led Parties Crowd Out Armed Organizations: Explaining Maoist Violence in India’, World Politics, 71: 2, pp. 367–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chetty, R., Hendren, N., Kline, P. and Saez, E.. 2014. ‘Where is the Land of Opportunity? The Geography of Intergenerational Mobility in the United States’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129: 4, pp. 1553–1623.Google Scholar
Cironne, A. 2020. ‘Historical Political Economy of Parliaments’ in Handbook of Parliamentary Studies: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Legislatures, ed. Benoît, C. and Rozenberg, O.. Cheltenham.Google Scholar
Clark, G. 2014. The Son Also Rises. Princeton.Google Scholar
Clark, G., Cummins, N., Hao, Y. and Vidal, D. D.. 2015. ‘Surnames: A New Source for the History of Social Mobility’, Explorations in Economic History, 55: 1, pp. 3–24.Google Scholar
Costalli, S. and Ruggeri, A.. 2019. ‘The Study of Armed Conflict and Historical Data’, APSA-CP Newsletter, 29: 2, pp. 58–63.Google Scholar
David, P. A. 1976. Reckoning with Slavery: A Critical Study in the Quantitative History of American Negro Slavery. New York.Google Scholar
Deaton, A. 2020. ‘Randomization in the Tropics Revisited: A Theme and Eleven Variations’, NBER Working Paper 27600.Google Scholar
Dell, M. 2010. ‘The Persistent Effects of Peru’s Mining “Mita”’, Econometrica, 78: 6, pp. 1863–1903.Google Scholar
Dell, M., Lane, N. and Querubin, P.. 2018. ‘The Historical State, Local Collective Action, and Economic Development in Vietnam’, Econometrica, 86: 6, pp. 2083–2121.Google Scholar
Dell, M. and Olken, B. A.. 2020. ‘The Development Effects of the Extractive Colonial Economy: The Dutch Cultivation System in Java’, Review of Economic Studies, 87: 1, pp. 164–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, J. 2000. ‘Review: Rational Choice History: A Case of Excessive Ambition’, American Political Science Review, 94: 3, pp. 685–95.Google Scholar
Ermakoff, I. 2015. ‘The Structure of Contingency’, American Journal of Sociology, 121: 1, pp. 64–125.Google Scholar
Ermakoff, I. 2019. ‘Causality and History: Modes of Causal Investigation in Historical Social Sciences’, Annual Review of Sociology, 45: 1, pp. 581–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrie, J. P. 2005. ‘History Lessons: The End of American Exceptionalism? Mobility in the United States since 1850’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19: 3, pp. 199–215.Google Scholar
Ferwerda, J. and Miller, N. L.. 2014. ‘Political Devolution and Resistance to Foreign Rule: A Natural Experiment’, American Political Science Review, 108: 3, pp. 642–60.Google Scholar
Fogel, R. W. and Engerman, S. L.. 1974. Time on the Cross: The Economics of American Negro Slavery. Boston.Google Scholar
Gaddis, J. L. 2002. The Landscape of History. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gasparyan, O. 2019. ‘The Importance and Peculiarities of Archival Work in Political Science’, APSA-CP Newsletter, 29: 2, pp. 5–11.Google Scholar
Gingerich, D. W. and Vogler, J. P.. 2020. ‘Pandemics and Political Development: The Electoral Legacy of the Black Death in Germany’, Working Paper, University of Virginia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldthorpe, J. H. 1991. ‘The Uses of History in Sociology: Reflections on Some Recent Tendencies’, British Journal of Sociology, 42: 2, pp. 211–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutman, H. G. 1975. Slavery and the Numbers Game: A Critique of Time on the Cross. Urbana.Google Scholar
Hager, A., Krakowski, K. and Schaub, M.. 2019. ‘Ethnic Riots and Prosocial Behavior: Evidence from Kyrgyzstan’, American Political Science Review, 113: 4, pp. 1029–44.Google Scholar
Hall, A. B., Huff, C. and Kuriwaki, S.. 2019. ‘Wealth, Slaveownership, and Fighting for the Confederacy: An Empirical Study of the American Civil War’, American Political Science Review, 113: 3, pp. 658–73.Google Scholar
Hanson, S. E. and Kopstein, J. S.. 2005. ‘Regime Type and Diffusion in Comparative Politics Methodology’, Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue Canadienne de Science Politique, 38: 1, pp. 69–99.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. 1981. ‘Looking Forward: History and the Future’, New Left Review, 125: 1, pp. 3–19.Google Scholar
Kalyvas, Stathis N. 1996. The Rise of Christian Democracy in Europe. Ithaca and New York.Google Scholar
Kelly, M. 2019. ‘The Standard Errors of Persistence’, UCD Centre for Economic Policy Research, Working Paper 19/13.Google Scholar
Kelly, M. 2020. ‘Understanding Persistence’, UCD Centre for Economic Policy Research, Working Paper 20/23.Google Scholar
Key, V. O. 1949. Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York.Google Scholar
King, G., Keohane, R. O. and Verba, S.. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton.Google Scholar
Kocher, M. A. and Monteiro, N.. 2016. ‘Lines of Demarcation: Causation, Design-Based Inference, and Historical Research’, Perspectives on Politics, 14: 4, pp. 952–75.Google Scholar
Kreuzer, M. 2010. ‘Historical Knowledge and Quantitative Analysis: The Case of the Origins of Proportional Representation’, American Political Science Review, 104: 2, pp. 369–92.Google Scholar
Kreuzer, M. 2020. The Grammar of Time: Using Comparative Historical Analysis to Investigate Macro-Historical Questions. New York.Google Scholar
Kuran, T. 1995. ‘The Inevitability of Future Revolutionary Surprises’, American Journal of Sociology, 100: 6, pp. 1528–51.Google Scholar
Linz, J. J. and Stepan, A.. 1978. The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Lustick, I. S. 1996. ‘History, Historiography, and Political Science: Multiple Historical Records and the Problem of Selection Bias’, American Political Science Review, 90: 3, pp. 605–18.Google Scholar
Mahoney, J. and Rueschemeyer, D.. 2003. Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mahoney, J. and Thelen, K. A.. 2015. Advances in Comparative-Historical Analysis. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Marsh, D. and Sharman, J. C.. 2009. ‘Policy Diffusion and Policy Transfer’, Policy Studies, 30: 3, pp. 269–88.Google Scholar
McCloskey, D. N. 1976. ‘Does the Past Have Useful Economics?’, Journal of Economic Literature, 14: 2, pp. 434–61.Google Scholar
McCloskey, D. N. 2010. ‘One More Step: An Agreeable Reply to Whaples’, Historically Speaking, 11: 2, pp. 22–3.Google Scholar
Mokyr, J. 2010. ‘On the Supposed Decline and Fall of Economic History’, Historically Speaking, 11: 2, pp. 23–5.Google Scholar
Møller, J. 2019. ‘Feet of Clay? How to Review Political Science Papers that Make Use of the Work of Historians’, PS: Political Science & Politics, 53: 2, pp. 253–7.Google Scholar
Moore, B. 1966. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World. Boston.Google Scholar
Nunn, N. 2014. ‘Historical Development’ in Handbook of Economic Growth, ed. Aghion, P. and Durlauf, S., vol. II. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Paglayan, A. 2019. ‘We Have History – and How it Changed me’, APSA-CP Newsletter, 29: 2, pp. 18–25.Google Scholar
Pepinsky, T. 2019. ‘The Return of the Single-Country Study’, Annual Reviews of Political Science, 22, pp. 187–203.Google Scholar
Piketty, T. 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. A. and Acemoglu, D.. 2006. Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rokkan, S. 1970. Citizens, Elections, Parties: Approaches to the Comparative Study of the Processes of Development. Oslo.Google Scholar
Sewell, W. H. 2005. Logics of History: Social Theory and Social Transformation. Chicago.Google Scholar
Skocpol, T. 1979. States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, D. and Simmons, E.. 2010. ‘Informative Regress: Critical Antecedents in Comparative Politics’, Comparative Political Studies, 43: 7, pp. 886–917.Google Scholar
Stone, L. 1979. ‘The Revival of Narrative: Reflections on a New Old History’, Past and Present, 85: 1, pp. 3–24.Google Scholar
Tilly, C. 1964. The Vendée. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Tilly, C. 1980. ‘Historical Sociology’ in Current Perspectives in Social Theory, ed. McNall, S. G. and Howe, G. N., vol. I. Greenwich, CT.Google Scholar
Tilly, C. 2001. ‘Historical Sociology’ in International Encyclopedia of the Behavioral and Social Sciences, vol. X. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Tur-Prats, A. and Valencia Caicedo, F.. 2020. ‘The Long Shadow of the Spanish Civil War’, unpublished paper.Google Scholar
Veyne, P. 1990. Bread and Circuses: Historical Sociology and Political Pluralism. London.Google Scholar
Voigtländer, N. and Voth, H.-J.. 2012. ‘Persecution Perpetuated: The Medieval Origins of Anti-Semitic Violence in Nazi Germany’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127: 3, pp. 1339–92.Google Scholar
Whaples, R. 2010. ‘Is Economic History a Neglected Field of Study?’, Historically Speaking, 11: 2, pp. 17–20.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×