Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T15:14:33.267Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Imaging in experimental neurology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 November 2009

By
Marc Fisher ,
Eng H. Lo  and
Michael Lev
Edited by
Turgut Tatlisumak  and
Marc Fisher
Marc Fisher
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology University of Massachusetts Medical School UMASS/Memorial Health Care 119 Belmont Street Worcester, MA 01605 USA
Eng H. Lo
Affiliation:
Departments of Neurology and Radiology Harvard Medical School Boston, MA 02115 USA
Michael Lev
Affiliation:
Department of Radiology Harvard Medical School Boston, MA 02115 USA
Turgut Tatlisumak
Affiliation:
Helsinki University Central Hospital
Marc Fisher
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts Medical School
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The availability of advanced imaging techniques has revolutionized the evaluation of many clinical neurological disorders. Similarly, the availability of advanced imaging techniques has enhanced the utility of animal models related to the study of these disorders. Currently, the most available and useful imaging techniques in animal models of neurological disorders are those related to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) applications, computerized tomography (CT), and positron emission tomography (PET). This chapter will introduce the basic concepts related to these various imaging modalities and then discuss their application to neurological disorders with a focus on acute ischemic brain injury.

Magnetic resonance imaging

A wide variety of MRI techniques are currently available for use in animals and patients. The range of MRI modalities and their main uses are provided in Table 9.1. The initial MRI modalities employed were T1- and T2-weighted imaging that evaluated the density of water proton spins. Water protons in relatively unrestricted fluid spaces have higher T1 and T2 values, while these protons in more restricted environments such as brain edema, hemorrhages, or tumors have lower values. These two MRI modalities are associated with an increase in interstitial water content of the brain, as seen with the development of vasogenic edema. Conventional T1 and T2 MRI have been used widely in clinical imaging for two decades and have also been used extensively in animal models of brain ischemia, tumors, traumatic injury, and multiple sclerosis (MS).

Type
Chapter
Information
Handbook of Experimental Neurology
Methods and Techniques in Animal Research
 , pp. 132 - 146
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beaulieu C, Moseley ME. Diffusion-weighted and perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in clinical stroke. In Fisher, M, Bogousslavsky, J (eds.) Current Review of Cerebrovascular Disease, 4th edn. Philadelphia, PA: Current Medicine, 2001, pp. 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruggen, N, Roberts, TP, Cremer, JE. The application of magnetic resonance imaging to the study of experimental cerebral ischemia. Cerebrovasc. Brain Metab. Rev. 1994, 6: 180–210.Google Scholar
Runge, VM, Price, AC, Wehr, CJ, Atkinson, JB. Contrast enhanced MRI: evaluation of a canine model of osmotic blood–brain barrier disruption. Invest. Radiol. 1985, 20: 830–844.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmiedl, UP, Kenney, J, Maravilla, KR. Kinetics of pathologic blood–brain-barrier permeability in an astrocytic glioma using contrast-enhanced MR. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 1992, 13: 5–14.Google Scholar
Knight, RA, Barker, PB, Fagan, SC, et al. Prediction of impending hemorrhagic transformation in ischemic stroke using magnetic resonance imaging in rats. Stroke 1998, 29: 144–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silver, NC, Good, CD, Barker, GJ, et al. Sensitivity of contrast enhanced MRI in multiple sclerosis: effects of gadolinium dose, magnetization transfer contrast and delayed imaging. Brain 1997, 120: 1149–1161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neumann-Haefelin, T, Moseley, ME, Albers, GW. New magnetic resonance imaging methods for cerebrovascular disease: emerging clinical applications. Ann. Neurol. 2000, 31: 559–570.3.0.CO;2-S>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, M, Albers, GW. Application of diffusion-perfusion magnetic resonance imaging in acute ischemic stroke. Neurology 1999, 52: 1750–1756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toorn, A, Skyova, E, Dijkhuizen, RM, et al. Dynamic changes in water ADC, energy metabolism, extracellular space volume and tortuosity in neonatal rat brain during global ischemia. Mag. Res. Med. 1996, 36: 52–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dijkhuizen, RM, Nicolay, K. Magnetic resonance imaging in experimental models of brain disorders. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2003, 23: 1383–1402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reith, W, Hasegawa, Y, Latour, LL, et al. Multislice diffusion mapping for 3-D evolution of cerebral ischemia in a rat stroke model. Neurology 1995, 45: 172–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, F, Carano, RAD, Irie, K, et al. Neuroprotective effects of a novel broad spectrum cation channel blocker LOE 908MS on experimental focal ischemia. J. Magn. Res. Imaging 1999, 10: 138–145.3.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chenevert, TL, Mckeever, PE, Ross, BD. Monitoring early response of experiemental brain tumors to therapy using diffusion magnetic resonance imaging. Clin. Cancer Res. 1997, 3: 1457–1466.Google Scholar
Fiehler, J, Foth, M, Kucinski, T, et al. Severe ADC decreases do not predict irreversible tissue damage in humans. Stroke 2002, 33: 79–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, F, Liu, KF, Silva, A, et al. Secondary decline in apparent diffusion coefficient and neurological outcome after a short period of focal brain ischemia in rats. Ann. Neurol. 2000, 48: 236–244.3.0.CO;2-7>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringer, TM, Neumann-Haefelin, T, Sobel, RA, Moseley, ME, Yenari, MA. Reversal of early diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance abnormalities does not necessarily reflect tissue salvage in experimental cerebral ischemia. Stroke 2001, 32: 2362–2369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidwell, CS, Saver, JL, Mattiello, J, et al. Thrombolytic reversal of acute human cerebral ischemic injury shown by diffusion/perfusion magnetic resonance imaging. Ann. Neurol. 2000, 47: 462–469.3.0.CO;2-Y>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calamante, F, Thomas, DL, Pell, GS, Wiersma, J, Turner, R. Measuring cerebral blood flow using magnetic resonance imaging techniques. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1999, 19: 701–735.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, DS, Detre, JA, Leigh, JS, Koretsky, AP. Magnetic resonance imaging of perfusion using spin inversion of arterial water. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 1992, 89: 212–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meng, X, Shen, Q, Fisher, M, Sotak, CH, Duong, TQ. Characterizing the diffusion/perfusion mismatch evolution in permanent and temporary experimental ischemic stroke models. Ann. Neurol. 2004, 55: 207–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, Q, Meng, X, Fisher, M, Sotak, CH, Duong, TQ. Pixel-by-pixel spatiotemporal progression of focal ischemia derived using quantitative perfusion and diffusion imaging. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2003, 23: 1479–1488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shen, Q, Fisher, M, Sotak, CH, Duong, TQ. Effect of reperfusion on ADC and CBF pixel-by-pixel dynamics in stroke: characterizing tissue fates using quantitative diffusion and perfusion imaging. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2004, 24: 280–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidwell, CS, Alger, JR, Saver, JL. Beyond mismatch: evolving paradigms in imaging the ischemic penumbra with multimodal magnetic resonance imaging. Stroke 2003, 34: 2729–2735.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiebach, JB, Schellinger, PD, Gass, A, et al. Stroke magnetic resonance imaging is accurate in hyperacute intracerebral hemorrhage: a multicenter study on the validity of stroke imaging. Stroke 2004, 35: 502–506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gustafsson, O, Rossitti, S, Ericsson, A, Raininko, R. MR imaging of experimentally induced intracranial hemorrhage. Acta Radiol. 1999, 40: 360–368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ogawa, S, Tank, DW, Menon, R, et al. Intrinsic signal changes accompanying sensory stimulation: functional brain mapping with magnetic resonance imaging. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 1992, 89: 5951–5955.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ono, Y, Morikawa, S, Inubishi, T, Shimizu, H, Yoshimoto, T. T2∗-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of cerebrovascular reactivity in rat reversible cerebral ischemia. Brain Res. 1997, 744: 207–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelled, G, Bergman, H, Goelman, G. Bilateral overactivation of the sensorimotor cortex in the unilateral rodent model of Parkinson's disease: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2002, 15: 389–394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cramer, SC, Nelles, G, Benson, RR, et al. A functional MRI study of subjects recovered from hemispheric stroke. Stroke 1997, 28: 2518–2527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Opdam, HI, Federico, P, Jackson, GD, et al. A sheep model for the study of focal epilepsy with concurrent intracranial EEG and functional MRI. Epilepsia 2002, 43: 779–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazurchuk, R, Zhou, R, Straubinger, RM, Chau, RI, Grossman, Z. Functional magnetic resonance (fMR) imaging of rat brain tumor model: implications for evaluation of tumor microvasculature and therapeutic response. Magn. Res. Imaging 1999, 17: 537–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber J, Forsting M. Magnetic resonance angiography. In Fisher, M, Bogousslavsky, J (eds.) Current Review of Cerebrovascular Disease, 4th edn. Philadelphia, PA: Current Medicine, 2001, pp. 85–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilger, T, Niessen, F, Diedenhofen, M, Hossmann, K, Hoehn-Berlage, M. Magnetic resonance angiography of thromboembolic stroke in rats. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2002, 22: 652–662.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blasberg, R. Imaging gene expression and endogenous molecular processes: molecular imaging. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2002, 22: 1157–1164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sipkins, DA, Giijbels, K, Tropper, FD, et al. ICAM-1 expression in autoimmune encephalitis visualized using magnetic resonance imaging. J. Neuroimmun. 2001, 104: 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoehn-Berlage, M, Kustermann, E, Blunk, J, et al. Monitoring of implanted stem cell migration in vivo. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99: 16267–16272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pevsner, PH. Computed tomography in a primate stroke model using selective balloon catheter arterial occlusion. J. Comput. Asst. Tomogr. 1997, 3: 105–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Del Zoppo, GJ, Copeland, BR, Waltz, TP, et al. The beneficial effect of intracarotid urokinase on acute stroke in a baboon model. Stroke 1986, 17: 638–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuroiwa, T, Seida, M, Tomida, S, et al. Discrepancies among CT, histological and BBB findings in early cerebral ischemia. J. Neurosurg. 1986, 65: 517–524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lev, MH, Farkas, J, Rodriguez, VR, et al. CT angiography in the rapid triage of patients with hyperacute stroke: accuracy in the detection of large vessel thrombus. J. Comput. Asst. Tomogr. 2001, 25: 520–528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lo, EH, Pan, Y, Matsumoto, K, Kowall, NW. Blood–brain barrier disruption in experimental focal ischemia: comparison between in vivo MRI and immunocytochemistry. Magn. Res. Imaging 1994, 12: 403–411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gur, D, Yonas, H, Herbert, D, et al. Xenon enhanced dynamic computed tomography: multilevel cerebral blood flow studies. J. Comput. Asst. Tomogr. 1981, 5: 334–340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yonas, H, Gur, D, Claassen, D, Wolfson, SK Jr, Moossy, J. Stable xenon enhanced computed tomography in the study of clinical and pathologic correlates of focal ischemia in baboons. Stroke 1988, 19: 228–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yonas, H, Gur, D, Classen, D, Wolfson, SK, Moossy, J. Stable xenon enhanced CT measurement of cerebral blood flow in reversible focal ischemia in baboons. J. Neurosurg. 1990, 73: 266–273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolfson, SK, Safar, P, Reich, H, et al. Dynamic heterogeneity of cerebral perfusion after prolonged cardiac arrest in dogs measured by stable xenon CT technique. Resuscitation 1992, 23: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lo, EH, Rogowska, J, Batchelder, KF, Wolf, GL. Hemodynamic alterations in focal cerebral ischemia: temporal correlation analysis for functional imaging. Neurol. Res. 1996, 18: 150–156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lo, EH, Rogowska, J, Bogorodzki, P, et al. Temporal correlation analysis of penumbral dynamics in focal cerebral ischemia. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1996, 16: 60–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shimizu-Sasamata, M, Kano, T, Rogowska, J, et al. YM872, a highly water-soluble AMPA antagonist, reduces brain damage in the hemodynamic penumbra after permanent focal ischemia in rats. Stroke 1998, 29: 2141–2148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lo, EH, Hara, H, Rogowska, J, et al. Temporal correlation mapping analysis of the hemodynamic penumbra in mutant mice deficient in endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene expression. Stroke 1994, 27: 1381–1386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamberg, LM, Hunter, GJ, Kierstead, D, et al. Measurement of quantitative cerebral blood volume with subtraction 3D-fCT. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 1996, 17: 1861–1869.Google Scholar
Hamberg, LM, Hunter, GJ, Maynard, KI, et al. Functional CT perfusion imaging in predicting the extent of cerebral infarction from a 3 hr middle cerebral artery occlusion in a primate model of stroke. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2002, 23: 1013–1021.Google Scholar
Hunter, GJ, Hamberg, LM, Ponzo, JA, et al. Assessment of cerebral perfusion and arterial anatomy in hyperacute stroke with three-dimensional functional CT: early clinical results. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 1998, 19: 29–37.Google ScholarPubMed
Lev, MH, Segal, AZ, Farkas, J, et al. Utility of perfusion-weighted CT imaging in acute middle cerebral artery stroke treated with intra-arterial thrombolysis: prediction of final infarct volume and clinical outcome. Stroke 2001, 32: 2021–2028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wintermark, M, Reichhart, M, Thiran, JP, et al. Prognostic accuracy of cerebral blood flow measurement by perfusion computed tomography, at the time of emergency room admission, in acute stroke patients. Ann. Neurol. 2002, 51: 417–432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eastwood, JD, Lev, MH, Provenzale, JM. Perfusion CT with iodinated contrast material. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2003, 180: 3–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baron, JC. Clinical use of positron emission computed tomography in cerebrovascular disease. Neurosurg. Clin America. 1996, 7: 653–664.Google Scholar
Baron, JC, Frackowiak, RSJ, Herholz, K, et al. Use of positron emission tomography in the investigation of cerebral hemodynamics and energy metabolism in cerebrovascular disease. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1989, 9: 723–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, CS, Samii, A, Sossi, V, et al. In vivo positron emission tomographic evidence for compensatory changes in post synaptic dopaminergic nerve terminals in Parkinson's disease. Ann. Neurol. 2000, 47: 493–500.3.0.CO;2-4>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchal, G, Serrati, C, Rioux, P, et al. PET imaging of cerebral perfusion and oxygen consumption in acute ischaemic stroke, relationship to outcome. Lancet 1993, 341: 925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yong, AR, Sette, G, Touzani, O, et al. Relationship between high oxygen extraction fraction in the acute stage and final infarction in reversible middle cerebral artery occlusion. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1996, 16: 1176–1188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, AR, Touzani, O, Derlon, JM, et al. Early reperfusion in the anesthetized baboon reduces brain damage following middle cerebral artery occlusion. Stroke 1997, 28: 632–638.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giffard, C, Young, AR, Kerouche, N, Derlon, JM, Baron, JC. Outcome of acutely ischemic brain tissue in prolonged middle cerebral artery occlusion. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2004, 24: 495–508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wantanbe, N, Young, AR, Garcia, JH, et al. Focal cerebral ischemia and chronic stage reduced flumazeril uptake in anesthetized baboons. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1999, 19: S16.Google Scholar
Heiss, WD, Graff, R, Lottgen, J, et al. Repeat positron emission tomographic studies in transient middle cerebral artery occlusion in cats: residual perfusion and efficacy of postischemic reperfusion. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1997, 17: 388–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pate, BD, Kawamata, T, Yamada, T, et al. Correlation of striatal fluorodopa uptake in the MPTP monkey with dopaminergic indices. Ann. Neurol. 1993, 34: 331–338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poyot, T, Couda, F, Gregoire, M–C, et al. Anatomic and biochemical correlates of the dopamine transporter ligand11 C-PE21 in normal and parkinsonian primates. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2001, 21: 782–792.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Imaging in experimental neurology
    • By Marc Fisher, Department of Neurology University of Massachusetts Medical School UMASS/Memorial Health Care 119 Belmont Street Worcester, MA 01605 USA, Eng H. Lo, Departments of Neurology and Radiology Harvard Medical School Boston, MA 02115 USA, Michael Lev, Department of Radiology Harvard Medical School Boston, MA 02115 USA
  • Edited by Turgut Tatlisumak, Marc Fisher
  • Book: Handbook of Experimental Neurology
  • Online publication: 04 November 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511541742.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Imaging in experimental neurology
    • By Marc Fisher, Department of Neurology University of Massachusetts Medical School UMASS/Memorial Health Care 119 Belmont Street Worcester, MA 01605 USA, Eng H. Lo, Departments of Neurology and Radiology Harvard Medical School Boston, MA 02115 USA, Michael Lev, Department of Radiology Harvard Medical School Boston, MA 02115 USA
  • Edited by Turgut Tatlisumak, Marc Fisher
  • Book: Handbook of Experimental Neurology
  • Online publication: 04 November 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511541742.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Imaging in experimental neurology
    • By Marc Fisher, Department of Neurology University of Massachusetts Medical School UMASS/Memorial Health Care 119 Belmont Street Worcester, MA 01605 USA, Eng H. Lo, Departments of Neurology and Radiology Harvard Medical School Boston, MA 02115 USA, Michael Lev, Department of Radiology Harvard Medical School Boston, MA 02115 USA
  • Edited by Turgut Tatlisumak, Marc Fisher
  • Book: Handbook of Experimental Neurology
  • Online publication: 04 November 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511541742.009
Available formats
×