Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T14:48:20.955Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Hysteroscopy

from Section 2 - Gynecologic Surgery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2018

Lisa Keder
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Martin E. Olsen
Affiliation:
East Tennessee State University
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Gynecologic Care , pp. 67 - 78
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

van Dongen, H, de Kroon, C, Jacobi, C et al. Diagnostic hysteroscopy in abnormal uterine bleeding: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Br J Obstet Gynecol 2007;114:664–75.Google Scholar
Valle, RF. Development of hysteroscopy: from a dream to a reality and its linkage to the present and future. J Min Invasive Gynecol 2007:14:407–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, TJ, Voit, D, Gupta, JK et al. Accuracy of hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of endometrial cancer and hyperplasia, a systematic quantitative review. J Am Med Assoc 2002;288:1610–21.Google Scholar
Brooks, PG. In the management of abnormal uterine bleeding, is office hysteroscopy preferable to sonography? The case for hysteroscopy. J Min Invasive Gynecol 2007;14:12–4.Google Scholar
Kim, A, Kim, H, Oh, S et al. A prospective comparison of the biopsy results from curettage and hysteroscopy in postmenopausal uterine bleeding. J Min Invasive Gynecol 2014;21:S143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fried, W, Bernstein, R, Krim, E et al. Comprehensive Pocket Atlas of Hysteroscopy. Canada: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2011, p. 34.Google Scholar
Corson, SL, Hoffman, JJ, Jackowski, J, Chapman, GA. Cardiopulmonary effects of direct venous CO2 insufflation in ewes: a model for CO2 hysteroscopy. J Reprod Med 1988;33: 440–4.Google Scholar
Corson, SL, Brooks, PG, Soderstrom, RM. Gynecologic endoscopic gas embolism. Fertil Steril 1996;65:529–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pellicano, M, Guida, M, Zullo, F et al. Carbon dioxide versus normal saline as a uterine distention medium for diagnostic vaginoscopic hysteroscopy in infertile patients: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Fertil Steril 2003;79:418–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garry, R, Hasham, F, Manmohan, SK, Mooney, P. The effect of pressure on fluid absorption during endometrial ablation. J Gynecol Surg 1992;8:110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emanuel, MH, Hart, A, Wamsteker, K, Lammes, F. An analysis of fluid loss during transcervical resection of submucous myomas. Fertil Steril 1997;68:881–6.Google Scholar
Boyd, HR, Stanley, C. Sources of error when tracking irrigation fluids during hysteroscopic procedures. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2000;7:472–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nezhat, CH, Fisher, DT, Datta, S. Investigation of often reported ten percent hysteroscopy fluid overfill: Is this accurate? J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2007;14:489–93.Google Scholar
Nagele, F, Bournas, N, O’Connor, H et al. Comparison of carbon dioxide and normal saline for uterine distention in outpatient hysteroscopy. Fertil Steril 1996;65:305–9.Google Scholar
Groenman, FA, Peters, LW, Rademaker, BM, Bakkum, EA. Embolism of air and gas in hysteroscopic procedures: pathophysiology and implication for daily practice. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2008;15:241–7.Google Scholar
Federico, H, Enrique, CF, Ramon, C. Diagnostic and Operative Hysteroscopy. United Kingdom: Anshan; 2007, pp. 167–78.Google Scholar
Jansen, FW, Vredevoogd, CB, Ulzen, KV et al. Complications of hysteroscopy: a prospective, multicenter study. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:266–70.Google Scholar
Ayus, JC, Wheeler, JM, Arieff, AI. Postoperative hyponatremic encephalopathy in menstruant women. Ann Intern Med 1992;117:891–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumar, A, Kumar, A. A simple technique to reduce fluid intravsation during endometrial resection. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2004;11:83–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AAGL Practice Report. Practice guidelines for the management of hysteroscopic distending media. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2013;20:137–48.Google Scholar
Kerkvoorde, TC, Veersema, S, Timmermans, A. Long-term complication of office hysteroscopy: analysis of 1028 cases. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2012;19:494–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Cooper, NA, smith, P, Khan, KS, Clark, TJ. Vaginoscopic approach to outpatient hysteroscopy: a systemic review of the effect on pain. Br J Obstet Gynecol 2010;117:532–9.Google Scholar
Deffieux, X, Gauthier, T, Menager, N et al. Hysteroscopy: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians. Europ J Obst Gynecol and Reprod Biol 2014;178:114–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Angioli, R, De Cicco Nardone, C, Plotti, F et al. Use of music to reduce anxiety during office hysteroscopy: prospective randomized trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2014;21:454–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shveiky, D, Rojansky, N, Revel, A et al. Complications of hysteroscopic surgery: “Beyond the learning curve”. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2007;14:218–22.Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Hysteroscopy, technology assessment in obstetrics and gynecology no. 7. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:1486–91.Google Scholar
Phillips, DR, Nathanson, HG, Milim, SJ, Haselkorn, JS. The effect of dilute vasopressin solution on the force needed for cervical dilation: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 1997 Apr;89:507–11.Google Scholar
Munro, MG. Mechanisms of thermal injury to the lower genital tract with radiofrequency resectosopic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2006;13:3642.Google Scholar
Agostini, A, Cravello, L, Shojai, R et al. Postoperative infection and surgical hysteroscopy. Fertil Steril 2002;77:766–8.Google Scholar
Kasius, JC, Broekmans, FJ, Fauser, BC et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis for hysteroscopy evaluation of the uterine cavity. Fertil Steril 2011;95:792–4.Google Scholar
Yazbeck, C, Dahinaut, C, Batallan, A et al. Diagnostic hysteroscopy and risk of peritoneal dissemination of tumor cell. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 2005;33:247–52.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×