Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 56
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
September 2011
Print publication year:
2011
Online ISBN:
9780511975288

Book description

Many languages include constructions which are sensitive to the expression of polarity: that is, negative polarity items, which cannot occur in affirmative clauses, and positive polarity items, which cannot occur in negatives. The phenomenon of polarity sensitivity has been an important source of evidence for theories about the mental architecture of grammar over the last fifty years, and to many the oddly dysfunctional sensitivities of polarity items have seemed to support a view of grammar as an encapsulated mental module fundamentally unrelated to other aspects of human cognition or communicative behavior. This book draws on insights from cognitive/functional linguistics and formal semantics to argue that, on the contrary, the grammar of sensitivity is grounded in a very general human cognitive ability to form categories and draw inferences based on scalar alternatives, and in the ways this ability is deployed for rhetorical effects in ordinary interpersonal communication.

Reviews

'Michael Israel's magisterial study of the scalar foundations of polarity confirms beyond the slightest shadow of a doubt that little things do mean a lot. With clarity, elegance and wit, Israel pries open the black box of polarity licensing (no mean feat!) to demonstrate the role of scalar models at the heart of emphasis, attenuation, and rhetorical effects. This book is essential - and delightful - reading for all linguists, philosophers, and cognitive scientists with an interest in meaning and understanding.'

Laurence Horn - Yale University

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents

References
Anscombre, J.-C. & Ducrot, O.. 1983. L'Argumentation dans la langue. Bruxelles: Mardaga.
Aranovich, R. 1996. “Negation, polarity, and indefiniteness: a comparative study of negative constructions in Spanish and English.” Ph.D. dissertation, UC San Diego.
Atlas, J. D. 1984. “Comparative adjectives and adverbials of degree: an introduction to radically radical pragmatics.” Linguistics and Philosophy 7: 347–77.
Atlas, J. D. 1996. “‘Only’ noun phrases, pseudo-negative generalized quantifiers, negative polarity items, and monotonicity.” Journal of Semantics 13: 265–330.
Atlas, J. D.Atlas, J. D.& Levinson, S. C.. 1981. “It-clefts, informativeness, and logical form: radical pragmatics (revised standard version).” In Cole, P. (ed.), Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 1–61.
Austin, J. L. [1956] 1970. “Ifs and cans.” In Urmson, J. O. & G. J. Warnock, (eds.), Philosophical Papers. Clarendon: Oxford University Press, 205–32.
Baker, C. L. 1970. “Double negatives.” Linguistic Inquiry 1: 169–86.
Barker, C. 1995. Possessive Description. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Barlow, M. & Kemmer, S.. 2000. Usage-Based Models of Grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Barwise, J. & Cooper, R.. 1981. “Generalized quantifiers and natural language.” Linguistics and Philosophy 4.2: 150–219.
Beaver, D. I. & Clark, B. Z.. 2003. “Always and only: why not all focus sensitive operators are alike.” Natural Language Semantics 11: 323–62.
Beaver, D. I. 2007. Sense and Sensitivity: How Focus Determines Meaning. Malden, MA / Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Bender, E. & Kathol, A.. 2001. “Constructional effects of just because … doesn't mean.” In BLS 27, Berkeley: University of California, 13–25.
Benveniste, E. 1966. Problèmes de linguistique générale. Paris: Editions Gallimard.
Bergen, B. & Chang, N.. 2005. “Embodied construction grammar.” In Östman, J.-O. & Fried, M. (eds.), Construction Grammars: Cognitive Grounding and Theoretical Extensions. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 147–90.
Bergen, A. & Bergen, K.. 1993. Negative Polarität im Englischen. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
Bernini, G. 1987. “Attempting the reconstruction of negation patterns in PIE.” In Ramat, A. G., Carruba, O. & Bernini, G. (eds.), Papers from the 7th International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 57–69.
Birner, B. & Ward, G. (eds.) 2006. Drawing the Boundaries of Meaning: Neo-Gricean Studies in Pragmatics and Semantics in Honor of Laurence R. Horn. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Bolinger, D. 1960. “Linguistic science and linguistic engineering.” Word 16: 374–91.
Bolinger, D. 1972. Degree Words. The Hague: Mouton.
Borkin, A. 1971. “Polarity items in questions.” In CLS 7. Chicago: CLS, 53–62.
Bosque, I. 1980. Sobre la negación. Madrid: Cátedra.
Bouvier, Y.-F. 2002. “A featural account of polarity phenomena.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Geneva.
Bowerman, M. 1988. “The ‘no negative evidence’ problem: how do children avoid constructing an overly general grammar?” In Hawkins, J. A. (ed.), Explaining Language Universals. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 73–101.
Braine, M. 1971. “On two types of models of the internalization of grammars.” In Slobin, D. I. (ed.), The Ontogenesis of Grammar: A Theoretical Symposium. New York: Academic Press, 153–86.
Bréal, M. [1900] 1964. Semantics: Studies in the Science of Meaning. Trans. Mrs. Cust, H.. New York: Dover Publications.
Brown, P. & Levinson, S.. 1978. “Universals in language usage: politeness phenomena.” In Goody, E. (ed.), Questions and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 56–289. Reissued as a monograph: Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
Buyssens, E. 1959. “Negative contexts.” English Studies 40: 163–69.
Bybee, J. 1985. Morphology: A Study of the Relation Between Meaning and Form. Amsterdam/Philadelphia; John Benjamins.
Bybee, J. 2001. Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bybee, J., Perkins, R. & Pagliuca, W.. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Caffi, C. & Janney, R. W.. 1994. “Toward a pragmatics of emotive communication.” Journal of Pragmatics 22: 325–73.
Carlson, G. 1980. “Polarity any is existential.” Linguistic Inquiry 11: 799–804.
Carnap, R. 1942. Introduction to Semantics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Carston, R. 1995. “Quantity maxims and generalized implicature.” Lingua 96: 213–44.
Carston, R. 1996. “Metalinguistic negation and echoic use.” Journal of Pragmatics 25: 309–30.
Carston, R. 1998. “Informativeness, relevance, and scalar implicature.” In Carston, R. & Uchida, S. (eds.), Relevance Theory: Applications and Implications. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 179–236.
Carston, R. 2002. “Linguistic meaning, communicated meaning and cognitive pragmatics.” Mind and Language. Special Issue on Pragmatics & Cognitive Science 17.1–2: 127–48.
Carlson, G. 1981. “Distribution of free-choice any.” In CLS 17. Chicago: CLS, 8–23.
Chierchia, G. 2004. “Scalar implicatures, polarity phenomena, and the syntax/pragmatics interface.” In Belleti, A. (ed.), Structures and Beyond. New York: Oxford University Press, 39–103.
Chomsky, N. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.
Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of a Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Clark, H. H. 1996. Using Language. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cormack, A. & Smith, N.. 2002. “Modals and negation in English.” In Barbiers, S., Beukema, F. & Wurff, W. (eds.), Modality and Its Interaction with the Verbal System. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 133–64.
Coulson, S. 2001. Semantic Leaps: Frame-Shifting and Conceptual Blending in Meaning Construction. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Crain, S. & Pietroski, P.. 2002. “Why language acquistion is a ‘snap’.” The Linguistic Review 19: 163–183.
Croft, W. 1991. “The evolution of negation.” Journal of Linguistics 27: 1–27.
Croft, W. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Croft, W. & Cruse, D. A.. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cutrer, M. 1994. “Time and tense in narrative and in everyday language.” Ph.D. dissertation, UC San Diego.
Davison, A. 1980. “Any as universal or existential.” In J. Auwera, (ed.), The Semantics of Determiners. London: Croom Helm, 11–40.
Davidson, D. 1967. “Truth and meaning.” Synthese 17: 304–23.
Dayal, V. 1998. “Any as inherent modal.” Linguistics and Philosophy 21: 433–76.
Dayal, V. 2004. “The universal force of free choice any.” Linguistic Variation Yearbook 4: 5–40.
Boer, A., Jong, J. & Landeweerd, R. (eds.) 1993. Language and Cognition 3: Yearbook 1993 of the Research Group for Theoretical and Experimental Linguistics. Groningen: TENK.
Declerck, R. 1995. “The problem of not … until.” Linguistics 33: 51–98.
Dikken, M. 2002. “Direct and indirect polarity item licensing.” Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 5: 35–66.
Dowty, D. 1991. “Thematic proto-roles and argument selection.” Language 67.3: 547–619.
Dowty, D. 1994. “The role of negative polarity and concord marking in natural language reasoning.” In M. Harrey & L. Santelmann (eds.), SALT IV. Ithaca: Dept. of Modern Languages and Liguistics, Cornell University, 114–44.
Ducrot, O. 1972. Dire et ne pas dire. Paris: Hermann.
Ducrot, O. 1973. La Preuve et le dire. Paris: Maison Mame.
Ducrot, O. 1980. Les Échelles argumentatives. Paris: Minuit.
Duffley, P. J. 1994. “Need and dare: the black sheep of the modal family.” Lingua 94: 213–43.
Duffley, P. J. & Larrivee, P.. 2010. “Anyone for non-scalarity?English Language and Linguistics 14.1: 1–17.
Edmondson, J. A. 1981. “Affectivity and gradient scope.” In CLS 17. Chicago: CLS, 38–44.
Edmondson, J. A. 1983. “Polarized auxiliaries.” In Heny, F. and Richards, B. (eds.), Linguistic Categories: Auxiliaries and Related Puzzles, Vol. I. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 49–68.
Emanatian, M. 1983. “Everything you always wanted to no.” Unpublished ms., UC Berkeley.
Falkenberg, G. 2001. “Lexical sensitivity in negative polarity verbs.” In Hoeksema et al. (eds.), 79–97.
Farkas, D. 2002. “Extreme non-specificity in Romanian.” In Beyssade, C.Bok-Bennema, R., Drijkoningen, F. & Monachesi, P. (eds.), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2000. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 127–51.
Fauconnier, G. 1975a. “Polarity and the scale principle.” In Grossman, R. E., San, L. J. & Vance, T.J. (eds.), CLS 11. Chicago: CLS, 188–199.
Fauconnier, G. 1975b. “Pragmatic scales and logical structures.” Linguistic Inquiry 6: 353–75.
Fauconnier, G. [1976] 1980. Etude de certains aspects logiques et grammaticaux de la quantification et de l'anaphore en français et en anglais. Lille: Atelier Reproduction des Thèses.
Fauconnier, G. 1978. “Implication reversal in a natural language.” In Guenther, F. & Schmidt, S. J. (eds.), Formal Semantics and Pragmatics for Natural Languages. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 289–301.
Fauconnier, G. 1980. “Pragmatic entailment and questions.” In Searle, J. R., Kiefer, F. & Bierwisch, M. (eds.), Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 57–71.
Fauconnier, G. 1985. Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press. Republished, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
Fauconnier, G. 1997. Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M.. 2002. The Way We Think. New York: Basic Books.
Fillmore, C. J. 1982. “Frame semantics.” In The Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm. Seoul: Hanshin, 111–37.
Fillmore, C. J. 1985. “Frames and the semantics of understanding.” Quaderni di Semantica 6: 222–54.
Fillmore, C. J., Kay, P. & O'Connor, M. C.. 1988. “Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: the case of let alone.” Language 64: 501–38.
Fintel, K. von. 1999. “NPI-licensing, strawson-entailment, and context dependency.” Journal of Semantics 16: 97–148.
Fintel, K. von. 2006. “Modality and Language.” In Borchert, D. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2nd edn. Detroit: MacMillan Reference USA.
Forget, D., Hirschbühler, P., Martineau, F. & Rivero, M. L. (eds.) 1997. Negation and Polarity: Syntax and Semantics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Francescotti, R. M. 1995. “Even: the conventional implicature approach reconsidered.” Linguistics and Philosophy 18: 153–73.
Gaatone, D. 1971. Etude descriptive du système de la négation en français contemporain. Geneva: Librairie Droz.
Garrido, J. 1992. “Expectations in Spanish and German adverbs of change.” Folia Linguistica 26: 357–402.
Gazdar, G. 1979. Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition, and Logical Form. New York: Academic Press.
Geis, M. 1995. Speech Acts and Conversational Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Geis, M. & Lycan, W. G.. 1993. “Nonconditional conditionals.” Philosophical Topics 21: 35–55.
Giannakidou, A. 1998. Polarity Sensitivity as (Non)Veridical Dependency. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Giannakidou, Anastasia 1999. “Affective dependencies.” Linguistics and Philosophy 22: 367–421.
Giannakidou, Anastasia 2001. “The meaning of free choice.” Linguistics and Philosophy 24: 659–735.
Giannakidou, Anastasia 2006. “Only, emotive factive verbs, and the dual nature of polarity dependency.” Language 82.3: 575–603.
Gill, D. 1994. “Conjunctive operators in South-Asian languages.” In Davison, A. & Smith, F. M. (eds.), Papers from the Fifteenth South Asian Language Analysis Roundtable Conference, Iowa City: South Asian Studies Program, University of Iowa, 82–105.
Giannakidou, Anastasia 2005. “Conjunctions and universal quantifiers.” In Haspelmath, M., Dryer, M., Gil, D. & Comrie, B. (eds.), World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 230–3.
Givón, T. 1995. Functionalism and Grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Goldberg, A. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, Adele 2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford/ New York: Oxford University Press.
Goffman, E. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
Gordon, D. & Lakoff, G.. 1971. “Conversational postulates.” In CLS 7: 63–84.
Grady, J. 2005. “Primary metaphors as inputs to conceptual integration.” Journal of Pragmatics 37: 1595–614.
Green, L. J. 2002. African American English: A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grice, H. P. 1975. “Logic and conversation.” In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. (eds.), Syntax and Semantics. Vol.III: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, 41–58.
Guerzoni, E. 2004. “Even-NPIs in yes/no questions.” Natural Language Semantics 12: 319–34.
Haan, F. 1997. The Interaction of Modality and Negation: A Typological Study. New York/London: Garland.
Hamilton, Sir W. 1858. Discussions on Philosophy and Literature. New York: Harper and Brothers.
Hankamer, J. 1973. “Why there are two than's in English.” In CLS 9. Chicago: CLS, 179–91.
Haspelmath, M. 1997. Indefinite Pronouns. Oxford / New York: Oxford University Press.
Heim, I. 1984. “A note on negative polarity and downward entailingness.” In Jones, C. & Sells, P. (eds.), NELS 14. University of Massachusetts, Amherst: GLSA, 98–107.
Heinämäki, O. 1974. Semantics of English Temporal Connectives. Reproduced by Indiana University Linguistics Club, 1978.
Herburger, E. 2000. What Counts: Focus and Quantification. Lingusitic Inquiry, Monograph 36. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hinds, M. 1974. “Doubleplusgood polarity items.” In CLS 10. Chicago: CLS, 259–68.
Hirschberg, J. B. 1985. “A theory of scalar implicature.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Hoeksema, J. 1983. “Negative polarity and the comparative.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1: 403–34.
Hoeksema, J. 1986. “Monotonicity phenomena in natural language.” Linguistic Analysis 16: 25–40.
Hoeksema, J. 1994. “On the grammaticalization of negative polarity items.” In Gahl, S., Dalbey, A. & Johnson, C. (eds.), BLS 20. Berkeley: University of California, 273–82.
Hoeksema, J. 1996. “Review of Progovac,” 1994 Studies in Language: 196–207.
Hoeksema, J. 1997. “In days, weeks, months, years, ages: a class of temporal negative polarity items.” ms., Groningen University.
Hoeksema, J. 1998. “Corpus studies of negative polarity items.” In Turell, M. T. & Vallduvi, E. (eds.), IV-V Jornades de corpus lingüístics 1996–1997. Barcelona: Institut Universitari Lingüística Aplicada, 67–86.
Hoeksema, J. 2000. “Negative polarity items: triggering, scope and c-command.” In Horn & Kato (eds.), 115–46.
Hoeksema, J. 2007. “Parasitic licensing of negative polarity items.” Journal of Comparative German Linguistics 10: 163–82.
Hoeksema, J. & Rullmann, H.. 2001. “Scalarity and polarity: a study of scalar adverbs as polarity items.” In Hoeksema et al. (eds.), 129–71.
Hoeksema, J., Rullmann, H., Valencia, V. Sánchez & Wouden, T. (eds.) 2001. Perspectives on Negation and Polarity Items. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Horn, L. R. 1969. “A presuppositional analysis of only and even.” In Binnick, R. I, Davison, A., Green, G. M. & Morgan, J. L. (eds.), CLS 5. Chicago: CLS, 98–107.
Horn, L. R. 1970. “Ain't it hard anymore.” In CLS 6. Chicago: CLS, 318–27.
Horn, L. R. 1971. “Negative transportation: unsafe at any speed?” In CLS 7. Chicago: CLS, 120–33.
Horn, L. R. 1972. “On the semantic properties of logical operators in English”. Ph.D. dissertation, UC Los Angeles, distributed by IULC, 1976.
Horn, L. R. 1978. “Some aspects of negation.” In Greenberg, J., Ferguson, C. & Moravcsik, E. (eds.), Universals of Human Language, Vol IV: Syntax. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 127–210.
Horn, L. R. 1984. “Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature.” In Schiffrin (ed.), 11–42.
Horn, L. R. 1985. “Metalinguistic negation and pragmatic ambiguity.” Language 61: 121–74.
Horn, L. R. 1989. A Natural History of Negation. Chicago / London: University of Chicago Press.
Horn, L. R. 1991. “Duplex negatio affirmat …: the economy of double negation.” In Dobrin, Lise M., Nichols, Lynn & Rodriguez, Rosa M. (eds.), CLS: Papers from the Parasession on Negation, 27, 2. Chicago: CLS, 80–106.
Horn, L. R. 1996. “Exclusive company: only and the dynamics of vertical inference.” Journal of Semantics 13: 1–40.
Horn, L. R. 1997. “All John's children are as bald as the King of France: existential import and the geometry of opposition.” In Singer, K., Eggert, R. & Anderson, G. (eds.), CLS 33. Chicago: CLS, 155–80.
Horn, L. R. 2000a. “Pick a theory (not just any theory): indiscriminatives and the free choice indefinite.” In Horn & Kato (eds.), 147–92.
Horn, L. R. 2000b. “Any and (-)ever: free choice and free relatives.” In Wyner, A. (ed.), Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the Israeli Association for Theoretical Linguistics (IATL), 71–111.
Horn, L. R. 2000c. “From if to iff: conditional perfection as pragmatic strengthening.” Journal of Pragmatics 32: 289–326.
Horn, L. R. 2001. “Flaubert triggers, squatitive negation, and other quirks of grammar.” In Hoeksema et al. (eds.), 173–200.
Horn, L. R. 2002. “Assertoric inertia and scalar inference.” In Andronis, M., Deberport, E., Pycha, A. & Yeshimura, K. (eds.), Proceedings of the Panels of the CLS 38, 2. Chicago: CLS, 55–82.
Horn, L. R. 2005. “Airport '86 revisited: toward a unified indefinite any.” In Carlson, G. & Pelletier, F. J. (eds.), The Partee Effect. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 179–205.
Horn, L. R. forthcoming. “ONLY connect: how to unpack an exclusive proposition.” In Hackl, M. & Thornton, R. (eds.), A Festschrift for Jay Atlas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Horn, L. R. & Kato, Y.. (eds.) 2000. Negation and Polarity: Syntactic and Semantic Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Horn, L. R. & Lee, Young-Suk. 1995. “Progovac on polarity.” Journal of Linguistics 31: 401–24.
Horn, L. R. & Ward, G. (eds.) 2004. The Handbook of Pragmatics. Basil: Blackwell Publishers.
Hübler, A. 1983. Understatements and Hedges in English. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Huddleston, R. & Pullum, G. K.. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Israel, M. 1995a. “Negative polarity and phantom reference.” In BLS 21. Berkeley: University of California, 162–73.
Israel, M. 1995b. “Review of Negative Contexts by Ton van der Wouden.” Glot International 1.5: 10–12.
Israel, M. 1996. “Polarity sensitivity as lexical semantics.” Linguistics and Philosophy 19: 619–666.
Israel, M. 1997. “The scalar model of polarity sensitivity: the case of the aspectual operators.” In Forget, et al. (eds.), 209–29.
Israel, M. 1998a. “The rhetoric of grammar: scalar reasoning and polarity sensitivity.” Ph.D. dissertation, UC San Diego.
Israel, M. 1998b. “Ever: polysemy and polarity sensitivity.” Linguistic Notes from La Jolla 19: 29–45.
Israel, M. 1999. “Some and the pragmatics of indefinite construal.” In BLS 25. Berkeley: University of California, 169–82.
Israel, M. 2001. “Minimizers, maximizers, and the rhetoric of scalar reasoning.” Journal of Semantics 18.4: 297–331.
Israel, M. 2002. “Literally speaking.” Journal of Pragmatics 34: 423–32.
Israel, M. 2004. “The pragmatics of polarity.” In Horn, & Ward, (eds.), 701–23.
Israel, M. 2006. “Saying less and meaning less.” In Birner & Ward (eds.), 143–62.
Jackson, E. 1994. “Negative polarity, definites under quantification and general statements.” Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.
Jacobson, P. 2006. “I can't seem to figure this out.” In Birner & Ward (eds.), 157–76.
Jayez, J. & Tovena, L. M.. 2005. “Free choiceness and non-individuation.” Linguistics and Philosophy 28.1: 1–71.
Jennings, R. E. 1994. The Geneology of Disjunction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Jespersen, O. 1917. Negation in English and Other Languages. Copenhagen: A. F. Host.
Jespersen, O. 1924. The Philosophy of Grammar. London: George Allen & Unwin, Ltd.
Johannessen, J. B. 2003. “Negative polarity verbs in Norwegian.” Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 71: 33–73.
Johnson, M. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Kadmon, N. & Landman, F.. 1993. “Any.” Linguistics and Philosophy 16: 353–422.
Karttunen, L. 1974. “Until.” CLS 10: 284–97.
Karttunen, L.& Peters, S.. 1979. “Conventional implicature.” In Oh, C.-K. & Dineen, D. A. (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol II: Presupposition. New York: Academic Press, 1–56.
Kas, M. 1993. Essays on Boolean Functions and Negative Polarity. Groningen Dissertations in Linguistics 11. Groningen: Center for Language and Cognition Groningen.
Katz, J. J. 1977. Propositional Structure and Illocutionary Force. New York: Crowell.
Kay, P. 1983. “Linguistic competence and folk theories of language: two English hedges.” In BLS 9. Berkeley: University of California, 128–37.
Kay, P. 1989. “Contextual operators: respective, respectively, and vice versa.” In BLS 15. Berkeley: University of California, 181–93.
Kay, P. 1990. “Even.” Linguistics and Philosophy 13: 59–111.
Kay, P. 1997. Words and the Grammar of Context. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publication.
Kay, P. & Fillmore, C. J.. 1999. “Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: the what's X doing Y construction.” Language 75: 1–34.
Kirsner, R. S. 1993. “From meaning to message in two theories: cognitive and Saussurean views of the modern Dutch demonstratives.” In Geiger, R. & Rudzka-Ostyn, B. (eds.), Conceptualizations and Mental Processing in Language. Cognitive Linguistics Research 3. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 81–114.
Klein, H. 1998. Adverbs of Degree in Dutch and Related Languages. Linguistik Aktuell, vol. 21. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Klima, E. S. 1964. “Negation in English.” In Fodor, J. and Katz, J. (eds.), The Structure of Language: Readings in the Philosophy of Language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 246–323.
Koenig, J.-P. 1999. Lexical Relations. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
König, E. 1977. “Temporal and non-temporal uses of noch and schon in German.” Linguistics and Philosophy 1: 173–98.
König, E. 1991. The Meaning of Focus Particles: A Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge.
König, E. & Traugott, E. C.. 1982. “Divergence and apparent convergence in the development of yet and still.” In BLS 8. Berkeley: University of California, 170–9.
Kratzer, A. 1991. “Modality.” In Stechow, A. & Wunderlich, D. (eds.), Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. Berlin: de Gruyter, 639–50.
Krifka, M. 1992. “Some remarks on polarity items.” In Zaefferer, D. (ed.), Semantic Universals and Universal Semantics. Dordrecht: Foris, 150–89.
Krifka, M. 1994. “The semantics and pragmatics of weak and strong polarity items in assertions.” In Harvey, M. & Santelmann, L. (eds.), Proceedings of SALT IV. Ithaca: Dept. of Modern Language and Linguistics, Cornell University, 195–219.
Krifka, M. 1995. “The semantics and pragmatics of polarity items.” Linguistic Analysis 25: 209–57.
Krifka, M., Carlson, G., Pelletier, F. J., Meulen, A., Chierchia, G. & Links, G.. 1995. “Genericity: an introduction.” In Carlson, G. & Pelletier, F. J. (eds.), The Generic Book. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1–124.
Kuczaj, S. 1976. “-ing and -ed: a study of the acquisition of certain verb inflections.” ms., University of Minnesota.
Kuroda, S.-Y. 1992. Japanese Syntax and Semantics: Collected Papers. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.
Labov, W. 1975. What is a Linguistic Fact?Lisse: Peter de Ridder.
Labov, W. 1984. “Intensity.” In Schiffrin, (ed.), 43–70.
Ladusaw, W. 1979. “Polarity sensitivity as inherent scope relations.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas, Austin. Republished in the series Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics. New York & London: Garland, 1980.
Ladusaw, W. 1983. “Logical form and conditions on grammaticality.” Linguistics and Philosophy 6: 373–92.
Ladusaw, W. 1992. “Expressing negation.” In Barker, C. & Dowty, D. (eds.), Proceedings of the SALT II. Columbus: Linguistics Department, Ohio State University, 237–59.
Ladusaw, W. 1996. “Negation and polarity items.” In Lappin, S. (ed.), The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory. Oxford and Malden: Blackwell Publishers, 321–41.
Lahiri, U. 1998. “Focus and negative polarity in Hindi.” Natural Language Semantics 6: 57–123.
Laka, I. 1990. “Negation in syntax: on the nature of functional categories and projections.” Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Lakoff, G. 1972. “Hedges: a study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts.” In Perenteau, P., Levi, J. & Phares, G. (eds.), CLS 8. Chicago: CLS, 183–228.
Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M.. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh. New York: Basic Books.
Lakoff, R. 1969. “A syntactic argument for negative transportation.” In Binnick, R. I., Davison, A., Green, G. M. & Morgan, J. L. (eds.), CLS 5. Chicago: CLS, 140–147.
Lakoff, R. 1970. “Some reasons why there can't be any some-any rule.” Language 45: 608–15.
Lakoff, R. 1973. “The logic of politeness; or, minding your p's and q's.” In Colum, C.et al. (eds.), CLS 9, 149–62.
Langacker, R. W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. I: Theoretical Prerequisities. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, R. W. 1988. “A usage-based model.” In Rudzka-Ostyn, B. (ed.), Topics in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 127–61.
Langacker, R. W. 1990. “Subjectification.” Cognitive Linguistics 1: 5–38.
Langacker, R. W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. II: Descriptive Application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, R. W. 1997. “Generics and habituals.” In Athanasiadou, Angeliki & Dirven, René (eds.), On Conditionals Again, Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 143. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 191–222.
Langacker, R. W. 2000. “A dynamic usage-based model.” In Barlow, & Kemmer, (eds.), 1–64.
Langacker, R. W. 2002. “One any.” In Korean Linguistics Today and Tomorrow: Proceedings of the 2002 International Conference on Korean Linguisitcs. Seoul: Association for Korean Linguistics, 282–300.
Langendoen, D. T. 1970. “The ‘can't seem to’ construction.” Linguistic Inquiry 1: 25–35.
Larrivée, P. 1996. “A semantic definition of negative polarity items with evidence from French and English.” Unpublished ms., Université of Laval.
Lee, C. 1996. “Negative polarity items in English and Korean.” Language Sciences 18: 505–23.
Lee, Y. & Horn, L. R.. 1994. “Any as Indefinite plus even.” Unpublished ms., Yale University.
Leech, G. 1980. Explorations in Semantics and Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Leech, G. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
Lees, R. B. 1960. “Review of Bolinger, 1957, Interrogative Structures in American English.” Word 16: 119–25.
LeGrand, J. E. 1975. “Or and any: the semantics and syntax of two logical operators,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago.
Leuschner, Torsten, 1996. “Ever and universal quantifiers of time: observations from some Germanic languages.” Language Sciences 18. 1–2: 469–84.
Levinson, S. C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levinson, S. C. 2000. Presumptive Meanings. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
Lindholm, J. M. 1969. “Negative raising and sentence pronominalization.” In Binnick, R. I., Davison, A., Green, G. M. & Morgan, J. L. (eds.), CLS 5, 148–58.
Linebarger, M. 1980. “The grammar of negative polarity.” Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Linebarger, M. 1987. “Negative polarity and grammatical representation.” Linguistics and Philosophy 10: 325–87.
Linebarger, M. 1991. “Negative polarity as linguistic evidence.” In Dobrin, L. M., Nichols, L. & Rodriguez, R. M. (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Negation. 27, 2. Chicago: CLS, 165–88.
Löbner, S. 1987. “Quantification as a major module of natural language semantics.” In Groenendijk, J., d. de Jongh & Stokhof, M. (eds.), Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers. Foris: Dordrecht, 53–85.
Löbner, S. 1989. “German schon-erst-noch: an integrated analysis.” Linguistics and Philosophy 12: 167–212.
Lyons, J. 1982. “Deixis and subjectivity: loquor, ergo sum?” In J. Jarvella, R. & Klein, W. (eds.), Speech, Place and Action: Studies in Deixis and Related Topics. New York: Wiley, 101–24.
MacWhinney, B. 1995. The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Mahajan, A. 1990. “LF-conditions on negative polarity licensing.” Lingua 80: 330–48.
Mandler, J. M. 1992. “How to build a baby: II conceptual primitives.” Psychological Review 99: 587–604.
Margerie, H. 2007. “From downgrading to (over) intensifying: a pragmatic study in English and French.” In Kescskes, I. & Horn, L. R. (eds.), Explorations in Pragmatics: Linguistic, Cognitive and Intercultural Aspects. Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin, 287–312.
Margerie, H. 2008. “A historical and collexeme analysis of the development of the compromiser fairly.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 9,2: 288–314.
Matsumoto, Y. 1995. “The conversational condition on horn scales.” Linguistics and Philosophy 18: 21–60.
May, R. 1985. Logical Form: Its Structure and Derivation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mazodier, C. 1998. “‘I must have read it in some article’: instabilité qualitative de some + discontinu singulier.” Cahiers de Recherche en Grammaire Anglais, 111–26.
McGloin, N. H. 1972. “Some Aspects of Negation in Japanese.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan.
Meillet, A. 1948. Linguistique historique et linguistique générale. Paris: La Société Linguistique de Paris.
Michaelis, L. A. 1992. “Aspect and the semantics-pragmatics interface: the case of already.” Lingua 87: 321–39.
Michaelis, L. A. 1993. “‘Continuity’ within three scalar models: the polysemy of adverbial still.” Journal of Semantics 10: 193–237.
Michaelis, L. A. & Lambecht, K.. 1996. “The exclamative sentence type in English.” In Goldberg, A. E. (ed.), Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 375–89.
Milsark, G. 1977. “Toward an explanation of certain peculiarities of the existential construction in English.” Linguistic Analysis 3: 1–29.
Mittwoch, A. 1977. “Negative sentences with until.” In CLS 13. Chicago: CLS, 410–17.
Mittwoch, A. 1988. “Aspects of english aspect: on the interaction of perfect, progressive and durational phrases.” Linguistics and Philosophy 11: 203–54.
Moeschler, J. 1997. “La négation comme expression procedurale.” In Forget (eds.), 231–49.
Möhren, F. 1980. Le renforcement affectif de la négation par l'expression d'une valeur minimale en ancien français. ‘Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie,’ 175. Tubingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
Morris, C. W. [1938]1955. “Foundations of the theory of signs.” In Neurath, O., Carnap, R. & Morris, C. W. (eds.), International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, Vol. I.
Morris, C. W. [1946]1998. “The scope and import of semiotic.” In Kasher, A. (ed.), Pragmatics: Critical Concepts, Vol I. London and New York: Routledge, 7–14.
Moxey, L. M. & Sanford, A. J.. 1993. Communicating Quantities: A Psychological Perspective. Hove & Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Palmer, F. R. 1994. “Psychological studies of quantifiers.” Journal of Semantics 11.3: 153–70.
Newmeyer, F. 2003. “Grammar is grammar and usage is usage.” Language 79.4: 682–707.
Palacios Martinez, I. M. 1999. “Negative polarity idioms in Modern English.” ICAME Journal, No. 23, 65–115.
Palmer, F. R. 1990. Modality and the English Modals. London and New York: Longman.
Palmer, F. R. 1995. “Negation and the modals of possibility and necessity.” In Bybee, J. & Fleischman, S. (eds.), Modality in Grammar and Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 453–71.
Paradis, C. 1997. Degree Modifiers of Adjectives in Spoken British English. Lund Studies in English 92. Lund: Lund University Press.
Paradis, C. 2001. “Adjectives and boundedness.” Cognitive Linguistics 12.1: 47–65.
Partee, B. H., Meulen, A. G.&Wall, R.. 1990. Mathematical Methods in Linguistics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.
Pinker, S. 1989. Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
Pollard, C. & Sag, I. A.. 1994. Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press/Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Portner, P. 2009. Modality. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Pott, A. F. 1859. Etymologishce Forschungen auf dem Gebiete der Ino-Germanischen Sprachen, Vol. I. Lemgo/Detmold: Meyer.
Powell, M. J. 1992. “Folk theories of meaning and principles of conventionality: encoding literal attitude via stance adverb.” In Lehrer, A. & Kittay, E. F. (eds.), Frames, Fields and Contrasts: New Essays in Semantic and Lexical Organization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 333–54.
Progovac, L. 1992. “Negative polarity: a semantico-syntactic approach.” Lingua 86: 271–99.
Progovac, L. 1994. Negative and Positive Polarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Quine, W. V. O. 1960. Word and Object. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G.&Svartik, J.. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
Raghibdoust, S. 1994. “The semantic-pragmatic nature of the persian polarity items.” Unpublished ms., University of Ottawa.
Roberts, C. 2004. “Context in dynamic interpretation.” In Hom & Ward (eds.), 197–220.
Rooy, R. van. 2003. “Negative polarity items in questions: strength as relevance.” Journal of Semantics 20: 239–73.
Rullmann, H. 1996. “Two types of negative polarity items.” In NELS 26, University of Massachusetts, Amherst: GLSA, 335–50.
Rullmann, H. 2002. “A note on the history of either.” In Andronis, M., Debenport, E., Pycha, A. & Yoshimura, K. (eds.), Proceeedings from the Panels of the CLS 38, 2. Chicago: CLS.
Rullmann, H. 2003. “Additive particles and polarity.” Journal of Semantics 20: 329–401.
Sadock, J. 1981. “Almost.” In Cole, (ed.), Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 257–71.
Sánchez Valencia, Víctor. 1991. “Studies on natural logic and categorial grammar.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Sánchez Valencia, V., Wouden, T. & Zwarts, F.. 1993. “Polarity and the flow of time.” In Jong, Boer & Landeweerd, (eds.), 209–18.
Sapir, E. 1944. “Grading: a study in semantics.” Philosophy of Science 11: 93–116. Reprinted in D. G. Mandelbaum (ed.), Edward Sapir: Selected Writings in Language, Culture, and Personality. Berkeley, Los Angeles/London: University of California Press, 1985, 122–49.
Schiffrin, D. (ed.) 1984. Meaning, Form and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications (GURT '84). Washington: Georgetown University Press.
Schmerling, S. 1971. “A note on negative polarity.” Papers in Linguistics 4: 200–6.
Schwenter, S. 1999a. The Pragmatics of Conditional Marking: Implicature, Scalarity, and Exclusivity. New York/London: Garland Press.
Schwenter, S. 1999b. “Two types of scalar particles: evidence from Spanish.” In Gutiérrez-Rexach, J. & Martínez-Gil, F. (eds.), Advances in Hispanic Linguistics. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 546–61.
Smith, S. 1975. Meaning and Negation. The Hague: Mouton.
Spencer, N. J. 1973. “Differences between linguists and nonlinguists in intuitions of grammaticality-acceptability.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2: 83–98.
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D.. [1986]1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.
Spitzbardt, H. 1963. “Overstatement and understatement in British and American English.” Philologica Pragensia 6:45 277–86.
Strawson, P. F. [1970]1985. “Meaning and truth.” 1969 Inaugural Lecture, Oxford University. Reprinted in Martinich, A. P. (ed.), The Philosophy of Language. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 101–12.
Suppes, P. 1974. “The semantics of children's language.” American Psychologist 29: 103–14.
Swart, H. 1996. “Meaning and use of not…until.” Journal of Semantics 13.3: 221–63.
Sweetser, E. 1988. “Grammaticalization and semantic bleaching.” In Axmaker, S., Jaisser, A. & Singmaster, H. (eds.), BLS 14, University of California, 389–405.
Sweetser, E. 1990. From Etymology To Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sweetser, E. & Dancygier, B.. 2005. Mental Spaces in Grammar: Conditional Constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Szabolsci, A. 2002. “Hungarian disjunctions and positive polarity.” In Kenesei, I. & Siptar, P. (eds.), Approaches to Hungarian 8. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 217–41.
Szabolsci, A. 2004. “Positive polarity – negative polarity.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22: 409–52.
Szabolsci, A. and Haddican, B.. 2004. “Conjunction meets negation: a study in cross-linguistic variation.”Journal of Semantics 21: 219–49.
Talmy, L. 1985. “Force dynamics in language and thought.” In Eilfort, W., Kroeber, P. & Peterson, K. (eds.), CLS: Paracession on causatives and Agentivity, 21. Chicago: CLS, 293–337.
Tomasello, M. 1999. The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Tomasello, M. 2003. Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Tovena, L. 1998. The Fine Structure of Polarity Items. New York: Garland.
Tovena, L. & Jayez, J.. 1999. “Any: from scalarity to arbitrariness.” In Corblin, F., Dobrovie-Sorin, C. & Marandin, J. M. (eds.), Empirical Issues in Formal Syntax and Semantics, Vol. II. The Hague: Theseus, 39–57.
Tovena, L., Deprez, V. & Jayez, J.. 2004. “Polarity sensitive items.” In Corblin, F. & Swart, H. (eds.), Handbook of French Semantics. CSLI Lecture Notes 17. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 403–27.
Traugott, E. C. 1988. “Pragmatic strengthening and grammaticalization.” In Axmaker, S., Jaisser, A. & Singmaster, H. (eds.), BLS 14. Berkeley: University of California 406–16.
Traugott, E. C. 1989. “On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: an example of subjectification in semantic change.” Language 65.1: 31–55.
Traugott, E. C. & Dasher, R. B.. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Traugott, E. C. & König, E.. 1991. “The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited.” In Traugott, E. C. & Heine, B. (eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 1. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 189–218.
Traugott, E. C. & Waterhouse, J.. 1969. “Already and yet: a suppletive set of aspect markers?Journal of Semantics 5: 287–304.
Uribe-Etxebarria, M. 1994. “Interface licensing conditions on negative polarity items: a theory of polarity and tense interactions.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Vallduvì, E. 1994. “Polarity items, n-words, and minimizers in Catalan and Spanish.” Probus 6: 263–94
Auwera, J. 1993. “Already and still: beyond duality.” Linguistics and Philosophy 16: 613–53.
Auwera, J. 2001. “On the typology of negative modals.” In Hoesksema et al. (eds.), 23–48.
Auwera, J. & Plungian, V.. 1998. “Modality's semantic map.” Linguistic Typology 2: 79–124.
Vasishth, S. 1998a. “Monotonicity constraints on negative polarity in Hindi.” Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics 51: 147–66.
Vendler, Z. 1967. Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Verhagen, A. 2005. Constructions of Intersubjectivity; Discourse, Syntax, and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wagenaar, K. 1930. Etude sur la négation en Ancien Espagnol jusqu'au XVe siècle. Groningen/The Hague: J. B. Wolters Uitgevers-Maatschappij.
Wal, S. 1996. Negative Polarity Items and Negation: Tandem Acquisition. Groningen Dissertations in Linguistics 17. Groningen: Center for Language and Cognition, Groningon.
Warfel, S. L. 1972. “Some, reference, and description.” In Mid-America Linguistics Conference Papers. Oklahoma City: Oklahoma State University, 41–9.
Wierzbicka, A. 1980. Lingua Mentalis: The Semantics of Natural Language. Sydney: Academic Press.
Wouden, T. 1996a. “Three modal verbs.” Paper presented at the Colloquium, The Germanic Verb, Dublin.
Wouden, T. 1996b. “Negative polarity auxiliaries.” Paper presented at the PIONIER conference Perspectives on Negation, Groningen.
Wouden, T. 1997. Negative Contexts: Collocation, Polarity and Multiple Negation. London/ New York: Routledge.
Wouden, T. & Zwarts, F.. 1993. “A semantic analysis of negative concord.” In Lahiri, L. L. & Wyner, A. Z (eds.), Proceedings of Semantics Theory III. Ithaca, 202–19.
Wright, G. H. 1951. An Essay in Modal Logic. Amsterdam: North Holland.
Yoshimura, A. 1994. “A cognitive constraint on negative polarity phenomena.” In Gohl, S., Dolbey, A. & Johnson, C. (eds.), BLS 20. Berkeley: University of California, 599–610.
Zanuttini, R. 1991. “Syntactic properties of sentential negation: a comparative study of Romance languages.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Zanuttini, R. & Portner, P.. 2003. “Exclamative clauses: at the syntax-semantics interface.” Language 79.1: 39–81.
Zepter, A. 2003. “How to be universal when you are existential: negative polarity items in the comparative: entailment along a scale.” Journal of Semantics 20: 193–237.
Zwarts, F. 1996. “A hierarchy of negative expressions.” In Wansing, H. (ed.), Negation: A Notion in Focus. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter, 169–94.
Zwarts, F. 1998. “Three types of polarity.” In Hamm, F. & Hinrichs, E. (eds.), Plural Quantification. Foris: Dordrect, 177–238.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.