Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-01T07:02:37.765Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 16 - Transitions in Energy Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2012

Global Energy Assessment Writing Team
By
Anand Patwardhan ,
Ines Azevedo ,
Tira Foran ,
Mahesh Patankar ,
Anand Rao ,
Rob Raven ,
Constantine Samaras ,
Adrian Smith ,
Geert Verbong  and
Rahul Walawalkar
...Show all authors
Anand Patwardhan
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Technology
Ines Azevedo
Affiliation:
Carnegie Mellon University
Tira Foran
Affiliation:
Commonwealth Scientific Industrial Research Organisation
Mahesh Patankar
Affiliation:
Independent Energy Sector Consultant
Anand Rao
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Technology
Rob Raven
Affiliation:
Eindhoven University of Technology
Constantine Samaras
Affiliation:
Rand Corporation
Adrian Smith
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
Geert Verbong
Affiliation:
Eindhoven University of Technology
Rahul Walawalkar
Affiliation:
Customized Energy Solutions
Riddhi Panse
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Technology
Saumya Ranjan
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Technology
Neha Umarji
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Technology
John Weyant
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Get access

Summary

Executive Summary

This chapter examines the theme of transitions in energy systems. It assesses the literature that explores the genesis, growth, and management of transitions. This literature provides a multi-level framework for large-scale, transformative change in technology systems, involving a hierarchy of changes from experiments to niches to technology regimes.

The chapter also covers specific innovation systems and experiments in the energy sector that may have the potential for larger impact and could lead to new niches or technology regimes. These experiments include technology-driven innovations in generation and end-use; system-level innovations that could reconfigure existing systems; and business model innovations centered on energy service delivery. Experiments in generation include hybrid systems, where multiple primary energy sources help address issues such as intermittency. Experiments in end-use include technology options for the simultaneous delivery of multiple energy services, or energy and non-energy services. System-level experiments include innovations in storage, distributed generation, and the facilitation of energy efficiency by effectively monetizing savings in energy use.

In some of these experiments, technology can lead to changing relationships between actors or changing roles for actors; for example, the process of consumers becoming producers is seen in small-scale biogas projects. These changing relationships present both challenges and opportunities for influencing the transition process. The chapter also discusses policy and institutional issues that affect transitions. Finally, it is seen that although technological research, development, and innovation are important, a wide-scale, equitable, and accessible transformation to energy systems for sustainable development needs to be tackled as a socio-political issue.

Type
Chapter
Information
Global Energy Assessment
Toward a Sustainable Future
 , pp. 1173 - 1202
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agnolucci, P. and P., Ekins, 2007: Technological transitions and strategic niche management: The case of the hydrogen economy. International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, 7 (5/6): 644–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, S. R., G. P., Hammond and M. C., McManus, 2008: Prospects for and barriers to domestic micro-generation: A United Kingdom perspective. Applied Energy, 85: 528–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,AREED, 2009: Examples of AREED Enterprises. African Rural Energy Enterprise Development (AREED). www.areed.org/projects/index _projects.htm (accessed September 5, 2009).Google Scholar
Azevedo, I. M. L., 2009: Energy Efficiency in the U.S. Residential Sector: An Engineering and Economic Assessment of Opportunities for Large Energy Savings and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions. Diss., Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
Azevedo, I. L., G., Morgan and F., Morgan, 2009: The transition to solid state lighting. The Proceedings of the IEEE, 97 (3): 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, J., 2008: New technology and possible advances in energy storage. Energy Policy, 36 (12): 4368–4373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bastakoti, B. P., 2003: Rural electrification and efforts to create enterprises for the effective use of power. Applied Energy, 76 (1–3): 145–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayod-Rújula, A. A., 2009: Future development of the electricity systems with distributed generation. Energy, 34: 377–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birnie, D. P., 2009: Solar-to-vehicle (S2V) systems for powering commuters of the future. Journal of Power Sources, 186: 539–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, T. H. and A. A., Frank, 2009: Design, demonstrations and sustainability impact assessments for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13 (1): 115–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J., Hendry, C.N., Harborne, P., 2007: An emerging market in fuel cells? Residential combined heat and power in four countries. Energy Policy, 35: 2173–2186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, H. S. and P. J., Vergragt, 2008: Bounded socio-technical experiments as agents of systemic change: The case of a zero-energy residential building. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 75: 107–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunse, K., M., VodickaP., Schönsleben, M., Brülhart and F. O., Ernst, 2010: Integrating energy efficiency performance in production management: Gap analysis between industrial needs and scientific literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19 (6–7): 667–679.Google Scholar
Caputo, A. C. and P. M., Pelagagge, 2002a: RDF production plants I: Design and costs. Applied Thermal Engineering, 22: 423–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caputo, A. C. and P. M., Pelagagge, 2002b: RDF production plants II: Economics and profitability. Applied Thermal Engineering, 22: 439–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chacartegui, R., D., Sánchez, N., di Gregorio, F. J., Jiménez-Espadafor, A., Muñoz and T., Sánchez, 2009: Feasibility analysis of a MED desalination plant in a combined cycle based cogeneration facility. Applied Thermal Engineering, 29 (2–3): 412–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clery, D., 2011: Greenhouse-power plant hybrid set to make Jordan's desert bloom. Science Magazine, 331 (6014): 136.Google ScholarPubMed
Cossent, R., T., Gómez and P., Frías, 2009: Towards a future with large penetration of distributed generation: Is the current regulation of electricity distribution ready? Regulatory recommendations under a European perspective. Energy Policy, 37 (3): 1145–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, P., Turner, K., Paton, C. (2004): Potential of the seawater greenhouse in middle eastern climates. In the Proceedings of International Engineering Conference, Jordan: 523–540.Google Scholar
Deshmukh, M. K. and S. S., Deshmukh, 2008: Modeling of hybrid renewable energy systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 12: 235–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dufo-López, R., J. L., Bernal-Agustín and F., Mendoza, 2009: Design and economical analysis of hybrid PV-wind systems connected to the grid for the intermittent production of hydrogen. Energy Policy, 37 (8): 3082–3095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elzen, B., B., Enserink and W. A., Smit, 1996: Socio-technical networks: How a technology studies approach may help to solve problems related to technical change. Social Studies of Science, 26 (1): 95–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,EPRI, 2003: Handbook of Energy Storage for Transmission and Distribution Applications. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), Paolo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
,EPRI, 2004: Handbook of Energy Storage for Grid-Connected Wind Generation Applications. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), Paolo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
,EPRI, 2007: Environmental Assessment of Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles, Volume 1: Nationwide Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and Volume 2: United States Air Quality Analysis Based on AEO-2006 Assumptions for 2030. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), Paolo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
,ETT, 2011: Electric Transmission Texas Brings Largest Utility-scale Battery in the United States to One of Oldest Cities in Texas. Electronic Transmission Texas (ETT), Austin, TX. www.ettexas.com/projects/presnas.asp (accessed October 9, 2010).Google Scholar
,Finnish Energy Industries, 2004: Energy – A Key for Competitiveness in Finland. Report by the Finnish Energy Sector for Government Analysis: Finland in the Global Economy, Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
Fouquet, R., 2010: The slow search for solutions: Lessons from historical energy transitions by sector and service. Energy Policy, 38: 6586–6596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, and Sullivan, , 2006: Today's rechargeable battery industry: Current state and recent innovations. Battery Power Online Magazine, April 2006.Google Scholar
GalvinPower, , 2010: What are some examples of smart microgrids?Galvin Electricity Initiative. www.galvinpower.org/smart-microgrids/smart-microgrid-examples (accessed October 9, 2010).Google Scholar
Geels, F. W., 2002: Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multilevel perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31: 1257–1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geels, F. W. and J. W., Schot, 2007: Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36: 399–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geels, F. W., M., Eames, F., Steward and A., Monaghan, 2008: The Feasibility of Systems Thinking in Sustainable Consumption and Production Policy. Report prepared for the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), Brunel University, London.Google Scholar
Genus, A. and A.-M., Coles, 2008: Rethinking the multi-level perspective of technological transitions. Research Policy, 39 (7): 1426–1445.Google Scholar
Goldman, C. A., N. C., Hopper and J. G., Osborn, 2005: Review of US ESCO industry market trends: An empirical analysis of project data. Energy Policy, 33 (3): 387–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grubler, A., N., Nakicenovik and D., Victor, 1999: Dynamics of energy technologies and global change. Energy Policy, 27: 247–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gyuk, I., P., Kulkarni, J. H., Sayer, J. D., Boyes, G. P., Corey and G. H., Peek, 2005: The United States of storage – electric energy storage. IEEE Power & Energy Magazine, 3 (2): 31–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamidi, V., K. S., Smith and R. C., Wilson, 2010: Smart Grid Technology Review within the Distribution and Transmission Sector. In Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference Europe (IGST Europe), IEEE, Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Han, W., J., Hongguang and W., Xu, 2007: A novel combined cycle with synthetic utilization of coal and natural gas. Energy, 32: 1334–1342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healey, G. P., 2008: Fostering Technologies for Sustainability: Improving Strategic Niche Management as a Guide for Action Using a Case Study of Wind Power in Australia. Diss., MRIT University, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
Hegger, D. L. T., J., van Vliet and B. J. M., van Vliet, 2007: Niche management and its contribution to regime change: The case of innovation in sanitation. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 19 (6): 729–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helm, D., 2005: The assessment: The new energy paradigm. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 21 (1): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinnells, M., 2008: Technologies to achieve demand reduction and microgeneration in buildings. Energy Policy, 36: 4427–4433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoogma, R., R., Kemp, J., Schot and B., Truffer, 2002: Experimenting for Sustainable Transport: The Approach of Strategic Niche Management. Routledge, London and New York.Google Scholar
Hu, L., J., Hongguang, G., Lin and H., Wei, 2011: Techno-economic evaluation of coalbased polygeneration systems of synthetic fuel and power with CO2 recovery. Energy Conservation and Management, 52: 274–283.Google Scholar
,IEA, 2005: World Energy Outlook 2005. International Energy Agency (IEA) of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Paris, France. www.iea.org/weo/2005.asp (accessed September 10, 2010).Google Scholar
,IEA, 2006: Light's Labour's Lost: Policies for Energy-efficient Lighting, in Support of the G8 Plan of Action. International Energy Agency (IEA) of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Paris, France.Google Scholar
Ieromonachou, P., S., Potter and M., Enoch, 2004: Adapting strategic niche management for evaluating radical transport policies – The case of the Durham Road access charging scheme. International Journal of Transport Management, 2 (2): 75–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalogirou, S. A. and Y., Tripanagnostopoulos, 2006: Hybrid PV/T solar systems for domestic hot water and electricity production. Energy Conversion and Management, 47: 3368–3382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalra, P. K. and R., Shekhar, 2006: Urban Energy Management: India Infrastructure Report. 3iNetwork, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
Kannan, R. and W., Boie, 2003: Energy management practices in SME-case study of a bakery in Germany. Energy Conversion and Management, 44: 945–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kathuria, V., 1998: Technology transfer and spillovers for Indian manufacturing firms. Development Policy Review, 16 (1): 73–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, R., A., Rip and J. W., Schot, 2001: Constructing transition paths through the management of niches. In Path Dependence and Creation, R., Garud and P., Karnoe (eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey, NJ.Google Scholar
Kemp, R., D., Loorbach and J., Rotmans, 2007: Transition management as a model for managing processes of co-evolution towards sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 14 (1): 78–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempton, W. and J., Tomic, 2005: Vehicle-to-grid power implementation: From stabilizing the grid to supporting large-scale renewable energy. Journal of Power Sources, 144 (1): 280–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, D. E., 2006: Electric Power Micro-grids: Opportunities and Challenges for an Emerging Distributed Energy Architecture. Diss., Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburg, PA.Google Scholar
Lantz, M., Svensson, M., Björnsson, L., Börjesson, P., 2007: The prospects for an expansion of biogas systems in Sweden: Incentives, barriers and potentials. In Energy Policy, 35 (3): 1830–1843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, H., Petersen, L. S., 2005: The Future Energy System: Distributed Production and Use. Ris Energy Report 4, Ris National Laboratory. Ris, Denmark.Google Scholar
Laughton, M., 1996: Combined heat and power: Executive summary. Applied Energy, 53: 227–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, G. and M., Gowen, 1987: Household Energy Handbook. World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Lindhqvist, T., 2001: Cleaner production: government policies and strategies. In Journal of Cleaner Production, 24 (1–2): 41–45.Google Scholar
Liu, L. and Z., Wang, 2009: The development and application practice of wind-solar energy hybrid generation systems in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13: 1504–1512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loorbach, D., 2007: Transition Management: New Mode of Governance for Sustainable Development. International Books, Utrecht, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Lovell, H., 2007: The governance of innovation in socio-technical systems: The difficulties of strategicniche management in practice. Science and Public Policy, 34 (1): 35–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahmoudi, H., S. A., Abdul-WahabM. F. A., Goosen, S. S., SablaniJ., Perret, A., Ouagued and N., Spahis, 2008: Weather data and analysis of hybrid photovoltaic-wind power generation systems adapted to a seawater greenhouse desalination unit designed for arid coastal countries. Desalination, 222: 119–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marbe, Å., S., Harvey and T., Berntsson, 2004: Biofuel gasification combined heat and power – new implementation opportunities resulting from combined supply of process steam and district heating. Energy, 29 (8): 1117–1137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marinova, D. and A., Balaguer, 2009: Transformation in the photovoltaics industry in Australia, Germany and Japan: Comparison of actors, knowledge, institutions and markets. Renewable Energy, 34: 461–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markard, J. and B., Truffer, 2008: Technological innovation systems and the multilevel perspective: Towards an integrated framework. Research Policy, 37: 596–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohamed, E. S. and G., Papadakis, 2004: Design, simulation and economic analysis of a stand-alone reverse osmosis desalination unit powered by wind turbines and photovoltaics. Desalination, 164 (1): 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monaghan, A., 2009: Conceptual niche management of grassroots innovation for sustainability: The case of body disposal practices in the UK. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76: 1026–1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mor, S., K., Ravindra, A., De Visscher, R. P., Dahiya and A., Chandra, 2006: Municipal solid waste characterization and its assessment for potential methane generation: A case study. Science of the Total Environment, 371 (1–3): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nfah, E. M. and J. M., Ngundam, 2009: Feasibility of pico-hydro and photovoltaic hybrid power systems for remote villages in Cameroon. Renewable Energy, 34 (6): 1445–1450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nouni, M. R., S. C., Mullick and T. C., Kandpal, 2008: Providing electricity access to remote areas in India: Niche areas for decentralized electricity supply. Renewable Energy, 34 (2): 430–434.Google Scholar
Nykvist, B. and L., Whitmarsh, 2008: A multi-level analysis of sustainable mobility transitions: Niche development in the UK and Sweden. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75: 1373–1387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pachauri, S. and L., Jiang, 2008: The household energy transition in India and China. Energy Policy, 36: 4022–4035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Painuly, J. P., H., Park, M.-K., Lee and J., Noh, 2003: Promoting energy efficiency financing and ESCOs in developing countries: mechanisms and barriers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 11 (6): 659–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paska, J., P., Biczel and M., Klos, 2009: Hybrid power systems – An effective way of utilizing primary energy sources. Renewable Energy, 34: 2414–2421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patankar, M. and A., Patwardhan, 2006: The switch to CNG in two urban areas in India: How was this achieved? In The Business of Sustainable Mobility: From Vision to Reality. P., Nieuwenhuis, P., Vergragt and P. E., Wells (eds.), Greenleaf Publishing Ltd., pp.171–186.Google Scholar
Patankar, M., A., Patwardhan and G., Verbong, 2010: A promising niche: waste to energy project in Indian dairy sector. Environmental Science and Policy, 13: 282–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patel, M. H., P., Pal and A., Nath, 2009: Savings from Divided Blast Cupola: A Case- Study of Successful Implementation at a Foundry Unit at Rajkot (Gujarat).
Perrin, M., Saint-Drenan, Y.M., Mattera, F., Malbranche, P., 2005: Lead-acid batteries in stationary applications: competitors and new markets for large penetration of renewable energies. In Journal of Power Sources, 144 (2): 402–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purohit, P., 2007: Financial evaluation of renewable energy technologies for irrigation water pumping in India. Energy Policy, 35: 3134–3144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahman, S., 2009: Smart grid expectations [in my view]. IEEE Energy and Power Magazine, 7 (5): 88, 84. ieeexplore.ieee.ord/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=520843009 (accessed January 10, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rane, M. V. and A., Dasgupta, 2003: International Patent PCT/IN2003/000408, for Multiutility Vapor Compression System. Raven, R. P. J. M., 2005: Strategic Niche Management for Biomass: A Comparative Study on the Experimental Introduction of Bioenergy Technologies in the Netherlands and Denmark. Eindhoven University Press, Eindhoven, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Rehman, I. H., K., Abhishek, R., Raven, D., Singh, J., Tiwari, R., Jha, P. K., Sinha and A., Mizra, 2010: Rural energy transitions in developing countries: A case of the Uttam Urja initiative in India. Environmental Science and Policy, 13: 303–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rip, A. and R., Kemp, 1998: Technological change. In Human Choice and Climate Change, vol. 2. S., Rayner and E. L., Malone (eds.), Battelle Press, Columbus, OH, pp.327–399.Google Scholar
Roberts, B., 2009: Performance, purpose and promise of different storage technologies. IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, (July-August 2009): 33–41.Google Scholar
Samaras, C. and K., Meisterling, 2008: Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from plug-in hybrid vehicles: Implications for policy. Environmental Science and Technology, 42 (9): 3170–3176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sauter, R. and J., Watson, 2007: Micro-generation: a disruptive innovation for the UK energy system? In Governing Technology for Sustainability. J., Murphy (ed.), Earthscan, London.Google Scholar
Schot, J. W. and F. W., Geels, 2008: Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda, and policy. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 20 (5): 537–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seyfang, G. and A., Smith, 2007: Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: Towards a new research and policy agenda. Environmental Politics, 16 (4): 584–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaahid, S. M. and I., El-Amin, 2009: Techno-economic evaluation of off-grid hybrid photovoltaic-diesel-battery power systems for rural electrification in Saudi Arabia – A way forward for sustainable development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13 (3): 625–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shafiei, E., Y., Saboohi and M. B., Ghofrani, 2009: Impact of innovation programs on development of energy system: Case of Iranian electricity-supply system. Energy Policy, 37 (6): 2221–2230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiau, C.-S. N., C., Samaras, R., Hauffe and J. J., Michalek, 2009: Impact of battery weight and charging patterns on the economic and environmental benefits of plug-in hybrid vehicles. Energy Policy, 37 (7): 2653–2663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, A., 2006: Cost-benefit Analysis of Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle Technology. Conference Paper NREL/CP-540–40485.Google Scholar
Smith, A., 2005: The alternative technology movement: An analysis of its framing and negotiation of technology development. Human Ecology Review, Special Issue on Nature, Science and Social Movements, 12 (2): 106–119.Google Scholar
Smith, A., 2006: Green niches in sustainable development: The case of organic food. Environment and Planning, Government and Policy, 24: 439–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A., 2007: Translating sustainabilities between green niches and socio-tech-nical regimes. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 19 (4): 427–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A., 2009: Energy governance: The challenges of sustainability. In Energy for the Future: A New Agenda. J. I., Scrase and G., Mackerron (eds.), Palgrave, London, pp.54–75.Google Scholar
Smith, A. and A., Stirling, 2010: The politics of social-ecological resilience and sustainable socio-technical transitions. Ecology and Society, 15 (1): 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A., A., Stirling and F., Berkhout, 2005: The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Research Policy, 34 (10): 1491–1510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stadler, M., C., Marnay, I. L., Azevedo, R., Komiyama and J., Lai, 2009: The open source stochastic building simulation tool SLBM and its capabilities to capture uncertainty of policymaking in the U.S. building sector. Presented at the 32nd IAEE International Conference on Energy, Economy, Environment: The Global View, San Francisco, CA, US on June 21–24, 2009. www.osti.gov/bridge/purl.cover.jsp;jsessionid =40A18DAB 655DE10339ADDED847495A71?purl=/957409-hMtopY/ (accessed April 9, 2009).Google Scholar
Stier, J. C., 1983: Technological substitution in the united states pulp and paper industry: The sulfate pulping process. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 23: 237–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suppes, G. J., 2006: Roles of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles in the transition to hydrogen economy. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 31: 353–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suurs, R. A.A., 2009: Motors of sustainable innovation-Towards a theory on the dynamics of technological innovation systems. Ph D Thesis, Utrecht University, Netherlands TERI, 2009: The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI), TERI Energy Data Directory and Year Book, New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
Thiruchelvam, M., S., Kumar and C., Visvanathan, 2003: Policy options to promote energy efficient and environmentally sound technologies in small and mediumscale industries. Energy Policy, 31 (2003): 977–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,US EIA, 2005: Electric Power Annual Report with Data for 2005: Existing Capacity by Energy. United States Energy Information Administration (US EIA).Google Scholar
van der Laak, W. W. M., R. P. J. M., Raven and G. P. J., Verbong, 2007: Strategic niche management for biofuels: Analyzing past experiments for developing new biofuels policies. Energy Policy, 35 (6): 3213–3225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Vleuten, E. and R. P. J. M., Raven, 2006: Lock-in and change: Distributed generation in Denmark in a long-term perspective. Energy Policy, 34 (18): 3739–3748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, M., 2000: Technological regimes and industrial dynamics: The evidence from Dutch manufacturing. Industrial and Corporate Change, 9: 173–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Eijck, J. and H., Romijn, 2007: Prospects for Jatropha Biofuels in Tanzania: An analysis with strategic niche management. Energy Policy, 36 (1): 311–325.Google Scholar
van Mierlo, B., 2002: Kiem van Maatschappelijke verandering. Diss. (in Dutch), Aksant, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Verheul, H., and Ph. J., Vergragt, 1995: Social experiments in the development of environmental technology: a bottom-up perspective. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 7 (3): 315–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vine, E., 2005: An international survey of the energy service company (ESCO) industry. Energy Policy, 33: 691–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walawalkar, R., 2008: Emerging Electrical Energy Storage Applications for Public Power Utilities in Competitive Electricity markets. Report presented to American Public Power Association under the Demonstration of Energy Efficiency Developments Scholarship.Google Scholar
Wallmark, C. and P., Alvfors, 2003: Technical design and economic evaluation of a stand-alone PEFC system for buildings in Sweden. Journal of Power Sources, 118 (1–2): 358–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Water Technology, 2009: Shoaiba Desalinization Plant at Saudi Arabia. www.water-technology.net/projects/shuaiba/ (accessed April 18, 2009).
Wiskerke, J. S. C., 2003: On promising niches and constraining socio-technical regimes: The case of Dutch wheat and bread. Environment and Planning, 35: 429–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witkamp, M. J., L. M. M., Royakkers and R. P. M., Raven, 2011: From cowboys to diplomats: challenges for social entrepreneurship in The Netherlands. Voluntas: international journal of voluntary and nonprofit organizations, 22 (2): 283–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, P., 2008: The implications of an increasingly decentralized energy system. Energy Policy, 36: 4509–4513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamashita, K. and L., Barreto, 2005: Energyplexes for the 21st century: Coal gasification for co-producing hydrogen, electricity and liquid fuels. Energy, 30: 2453–2473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×