Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T16:59:45.863Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2016

Anthony J. McGann
Affiliation:
University of Strathclyde, Glasgow
Charles Anthony Smith
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Michael Latner
Affiliation:
California Polytechnic State University
Alex Keena
Affiliation:
University of California-Irvine
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Gerrymandering in America
The House of Representatives, the Supreme Court, and the Future of Popular Sovereignty
, pp. 237 - 246
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams v. Johnson, 521 US 74 (1997).
Alabama Democratic Conference v. Alabama, No. 2:12-cv-1081-WKW-MHT-WHP (2014a).
Alabama Legislative Black Caucus v. Alabama, No. 2:12-cv-00691 (M.D. Ala.), No. 13–395, No. 13–895 & No. 13–1138 (S. Ct.) (2014b).
Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission, No. 2:12-cv-01211 (D. Ariz.) & No. 13–1314 (S. Ct.) (2015a).
Baker v. Carr, 369 US 186 (1962).
Bush v. Vera, 517 US 952 (1996a).
Cantor v. Personhuballah No. 3:13-cv-00678 (E.D. Va.), No. 14–518, & No. 14–1504 (S. Ct.) (2015b).
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 US 310 (2010).
Colegrove v. Green, 328 US 549 (1946).
Committee for a Fair and Balanced Map v. Illinois State Board of Elections, No. 1:11-cv-05065 (N.D. Ill.) (2011a).
Davis v. Bandemer, 478 US 109 (1986a).
Dickson v. Rucho, No. 11-CVS-16896 (N.C. Super Ct., Wake County), No. 201PA12, No. 201PA12-2, & No. 201PA12-3 (N.C. Sup. Ct.), No. 14–839 (Sup. Ct.) (2014c).
Easley v. Cromartie, 532 US 234 (2001).
Evenwel et al. v. Abbott et al., USSC (Docket No. 14–940) (lower court USDC W. Distr. TX). (2015c).
Gaffney v. Cummings, 412 US 735 (1973a).
Georgia v. Ashcroft, 539 US 461 (2003).
Gomillion v. Lightfoot, 364 US 339 (1960).
Gray v. Sanders, 372 US 368 (1963).
Hunt v. Cromartie, 526 US 541 (1999).
Johnson v. DeGrandy, 512 US 997 (1994).
Karcher v. Daggett, 462 US 725 (1983).
Kirkpatrick v. Preisler, 394 US 526 (1969).
League of Women Voters of Florida v. Detzner, No. 2012-CA-002842 (Fla. Cir. Ct., Leon County) & No. SC13-252 (Fla. Sup. Ct.) (2015d).
LULAC v. Perry, 548 US 399 (2006).
Miller v. Johnson, 515 US 900 (1995).
Mississippi Republican Executive Committee v. Brooks, 469 US 1002 (1984).
Mobile v. Bolden, 446 US 55 (1980).
Radogno v. Illinois State Board of Elections, No. 1:11-cv-04884 (N.D. Ill.) & No. 11–1127 (Sup. Ct.) (2011b).
Reynolds v. Sims, 377 US 533 (1964b).
Romo v. Detzner, consolidated case nos. 2012-CA-412 & 2012-CA-490 (2014d).
Shaw v. Hunt, 517 US 899 (1996b).
Shaw v. Reno, 509 US 630 (1993).
Shelby County v. Holder, 570 US (2013).
Smiley v. Holm, 285 US 355 (1932a).
South v. Peters, 339 US 276 (1950).
Thornburg v. Gingles, 478 US 30 (1986b).
Vieth v. Jubelirer, 541 US 267 (2004).
Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 US 1 (1964a).
White v. Regester, 412 US 755 (1973c).
White v. Weiser, 412 US 783 (1973b).
Wood v. Broom, 287 US 1 (1932b).
Abramowitz, Alan I., and Saunders, Kyle L.. 2008. Is Polarization a Myth? Journal of Politics 70 (2):542–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrams, Samuel J., and Fiorina, Morris P.. 2012. “The Big Sort” That Wasn't: A Skeptical Reexamination. PS: Political Science and Politics 45 (2):203–210.Google Scholar
Altman, Micah, MacDonald, Karin, and McDonald, Michael. 2005. From Crayons to Computers – the Evolution of Computer Use in Redistricting. Social Science Computer Review 23 (3):334–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altman, Micah, and McDonald, Michael P.. 2010. The Promise and Perils of Computers in Redistricting. Duke Journal of Constitutional Law and Public Policy 5:69–159.Google Scholar
Altman, Micah, and McDonald, Michael P.. 2011a. BARD: Better Automated Redistricting. Journal of Statistical Software 42 (4):1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altman, Micah, and McDonald, Michael P.. 2011b. Redistricting Principles for the Twenty-First Century. Case Western Reserve Law Review 62:1179.Google Scholar
Altman, Micah, and McDonald, Michael P.. 2013. A Half-Century of Virginia Redistricting Battles: Shifting from Rural Malapportionment to Voting Rights to Public Participation. University of Richmond Law Review 47:771–831.Google Scholar
Altman, Micah, and McDonald, Michael P.. 2014. Redistricting by Formula: An Ohio Reform Experiment. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2450645.
Altman, Micah, and McDonald, Michael P.. 2015. Paradoxes of Political Reform: Congressional Redistricting in Florida. In Jigsaw Puzzle Politics in the Sunshine State, edited by Gainesville, S. C. McKee.: University of Florida Press.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, S., Rodden, J., and Snyder, J. M.. 2008. The Strength of Issues: Using Multiple Measures to Gauge Preference Stability, Ideological Constraint, and Issue Voting. American Political Science Review 102 (2):215–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Snyder, James M.. 2008. The End of Inequality: One Person, One Vote and the Transformation of American Politics. 1st ed., Issues in American Democracy. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Ballotpedia. 2015. Ballotpedia: An Interactive Almanac of American. Politics 2015 [cited July 21, 2015]. Available from http://www.ballotpedia.org.
Barry, Brian. 1979. Is Democracy Special? In Philosophy, Politics and Society, 5th Series, edited by Laslett, P. and Fishkin, J.. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Peter, and Wasserman, David. 2012. Minority Districts Multiply: The Number of Congressional Districts with a Majority of Nonwhite Residents Has Tripled Since 1982. National Journal, April 13, 2012. News.yahoo.com/since-1982-minority-congressional-districts-tripled-graphic-083421594.html.Google Scholar
Bhaskar, Roy. 1989. The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences, 2nd ed. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Bishop, Bill, and Cushing, Robert G.. 2008. The Big Sort: Why the Clustering of Like-Minded America Is Tearing Us Apart. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
Borisyuk, Galina, Johnson, Ron, Rallings, Colin, and Thrasher, Michael. 2010. Parliamentary Constituency Boundary Reviews and Electoral Bias: How Important Are Variations in Constituency Size. Parliamentary Affairs 63 (1):4–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borisyuk, Galina, Johnson, Ron, Thrasher, Michael, and Rallings, Colin. 2010. A Method for Measuring and Decomposing Electoral Bias for the Three-Party Case, Illustrated by the British Case. Electoral Studies 29 (4):733–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyce, John R., and Bischak, Diane P.. 2002. The Role of Political Parties in the Organization of Congress. Journal of Law Economics & Organization 18 (1):1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brace, Kimball. 2004. Technology and Redistricting: A Personal Prospective on the Use of Technology in Redistricting over the past Thirty Years. In The Brookings Institute Conference on Congressional Redistricting. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Bradlee, Dave. 2014. Dave's Redistricting App. Available from http://gardow.com/davebradlee/redistricting/launchapp.html.
Brady, David W., and Grofman, Bernard. 1991. Sectional Differences in Partisan Bias and Electoral Responsiveness in United-States House Elections, 1850–1980. British Journal of Political Science 21:247–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, David, and Cain, Bruce E.. 1992. Congressional Redistricting: Comparative and Theoretical Perspectives, New Topics in Politics. New York, Toronto: Macmillan Pub. Co.; Maxwell Macmillan Canada.Google Scholar
Caliper, . 2014. Maptitude. Available from http://www.caliper.com/mtredist.htm.
Cameron, Charles, Epstein, David, and O'Halloran, Sharyn. 1996. Do Majority-Minority Districts Maximize Substantive Black Representation in Congress? American Political Science Review 90:794–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campagna, Janet, and Grofman, Bernard. 1990. Party Control and Partisan Bias in 1980s Congressional Redistricting. Journal of Politics 52 (4):1242–1257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Jowei, and Rodden, Jonathan. 2013a. Report on Computer Simulations of Florida Congressional Districting Plans. www.redistricting.lls.edu/files/FL%20romo%2020130215%20chen.pdf, unpublished working paper.
Chen, Jowei, and Rodden, Jonathan. 2013b. Unintentional Gerrymandering: Political Geography and Electoral Bias in Legislatures. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 8:239–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chubb, John E. 1988. Institutions, the Economy, and the Dynamics of State Elections. American Political Science Review 82 (1):133–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Citrin, Jack, Schickler, Eric, and Sides, John. 2003. What if Everyone Voted? Simulating the Impact of Increased Turnout in Senate Elections. American Journal of Political Science 47 (1):75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colomer, Josep. 2004. It's Parties that Choose Electoral Systems (or Duverger's Laws Upside Down). In Annual Meeting of the Public Choice Society. Baltimore, MD: Public Choice Society.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and Katz, Jonathan N.. 2002. Elbridge Gerry's Salamander: The Electoral Consequences of the Reapportionment Revolution, Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House, California Series on Social Choice and Political Economy. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crocker, Royce. 2012. Congressional Redistricting: An Overview. In CRS Report for Congress. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
Curtice, John. 2010. So What Went Wrong with the Electoral System? The 2010 Election Result and the Debate About Electoral Reform. Parliamentary Affairs 63 (4):632–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 1956. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kos, Daily. 2015. Redistricting California with 47 reasonably compact strong Dem seats (and only 6 GOP seats). Daily Kos 2015 [cited July 21, 2015]. Available from http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/07/03/1397966/-Redistricting-California-with-47-reasonably-compact-strong-Dem-seats-and-only-6-GOP-seats.
Dunleavy, Patrick. 2005. Facing Up to Multi-Party Politics: How Partisan Dealignment and PR Voting Have Fundamentally Changed Britain's Party System. Parliamentary Affairs 58 (3):503–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Economist. 2002. How to Rig an Election. The Economist, April 25, 2002, www.economist.com/node/1099030.
Electoral Reform Society. 2010. The UK General Election 2010 in Depth: Report and Analysis. London: ERS.
Engstrom, Richard N. 1995. Voting Rights Districts: Debunking the Myths. Campaigns and Elections 16:24–46.Google Scholar
Epstein, David, Herron, Michael C., O'Halloran, Sharyn, and Park, David. 2007. Estimating the Effect of Redistricting on Minority Substantive Representation. Journal of Law Economics & Organization 23 (2):499–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, David, and O'Halloran, Sharyn. 1999. Measuring the Electoral and Policy Impact of Majority-Minority Voting Districts: Candidates of Choice, Equal Opportunity, and Representation. American Journal of Political Science 43:367–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, Robert S. 1972. Malapportionment, Gerrymandering, and Party Fortunes in Congressional Elections. American Political Science Review 66 (4):1234–1245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, Robert S., MacKuen, Michael, and Stimson, James A.. 2002. The Macro Polity, Cambridge Studies in Political Psychology and Public Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P., Abrams, Samuel J., and Pope, Jeremy C.. 2006. Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America. New York: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P., Abrams, Samuel J., and Pope, Jeremy C.. 2008. Polarization in the American Public: Misconceptions and Misreadings. Journal of Politics 70 (2):556–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, Stephen D., and Curtice, John. 2006. Tactical Unwind? Changes in Party Preference Structure and Tactical Voting in Britain between 2001 and 2005. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 16 (1):55–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forest, Benjamin. 2005. The Changing Demographic, Legal, and Technological Contexts of Political Representation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102 (43):15331–15336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gardner, James. 2004. A Post-Vieth Strategy for Litigating Partisan Gerrymandering Claims. Election Law Journal 3 (4):643–652.Google Scholar
Gelman, Andrew, and King, Gary. 1990. Estimating the Electoral Consequences of Legislative Redistricting. Journal of the American Statistical Association 85 (410):274–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, Andrew, and King, Gary. 1994a. Enhancing Democracy through Legislative Redistricting. American Political Science Review 88 (3):541–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, Andrew, and King, Gary. 1994b. A Unified Method of Evaluating Electoral Systems and Redistricting Plans. American Journal of Political Science 38 (2):514–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goedert, Nicholas. 2014. Gerrymandering or Geography? How Democrats Won the Popular Vote but Lost the Congress in 2012. Research and Politics 1:1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grigg, Delia, and Katz, Jonathan N.. 2005. The Impact of Majority-Minority Districts on Congressional Elections presented at Midwest Political Science Association Meeting 2005, Chicago: MPSA.Google Scholar
Grofman, Bernard. 1990. Towards a Coherent Theory of Gerrymandering: Bandemer and Thornburg. In Political Gerrymandering and the Courts, edited by Grofman, B.. New York: Agathon Press.Google Scholar
Grofman, Bernard. 2006. Operationalizing the Section 5 Retrogression Standard of the Voting Rights Act in the Light of Georgia v. Ashcroft: Social Science Perspectives on Minority Influence, Opportunity and Control. Election Law Journal 5 (3):250–282.Google Scholar
Grofman, Bernard, and Handley, Lisa. 1991. The Impact of the Voting Rights Act on Black Representation in Southern State Legislatures. Legislative Studies Quarterly 16:111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grofman, Bernard, and King, Gary. 2007. The Future of Partisan Symmetry as a Judicial Test for Partisan Gerrymandering after LULAC v. Perry. Election Law Journal 6 (1):2–35.Google Scholar
Grofman, Bernard, Owen, Guillermo, and Collet, Christian. 1999. Rethinking the Partisan Effects of Higher Turnout: So What's the Question? Public Choice 99 (3–4):357–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansford, Thomas G., and Gomez, Brad T.. 2010. Estimating the Electoral Effects of Voter Turnout. American Political Science Review 104 (2):268–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasen, Richard L. 2004. Looking for Standards (in All the Wrong Places): Partisan Gerrymandering Claims after Vieth v. Jubelirer. Election Law Journal 3 (4):626–642.Google Scholar
Hasen, Richard L. 2011. The Supreme Court's Shrinking Election Law Docket, 2001–2010: A Legacy of Bush v. Gore or Fear of the Roberts Court? Election Law Journal 10 (4):325–333.Google Scholar
Hastie, Reid. 2011. The Challenge to Produce Useful “Legal Numbers.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 8 (S1):6–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, Sam. 2003. The United States House of Unrepresentatives: What Went Wrong in the Latest Round of Congressional Redistricting. Election Law Journal 2 (2):179–216.Google Scholar
Hout, Eliora van der, and McGann, Anthony J.. 2009a. Liberal Political Equality Implies Proportional Representation. Social Choice & Welfare 33 (4):617–620.Google Scholar
Hout, Eliora van der, and McGann, Anthony J.. 2009b. Proportional Representation within the Limits of Liberalism Alone. British Journal of Political Science 39:735–754.Google Scholar
Hout, Eliora van der, Swart, Harrie de, and Veer, Annemarie ter. 2006. Axioms Characterizing the Plurality Ranking Rule. Social Choice & Welfare 27 (3).Google Scholar
Ingraham, Christopher. 2014. America's Most Gerrymandered Congressional Districts. The Washington Post, May 15, 2014.
Issacharoff, Samuel, Karlan, Pamela S., and Pildes, Richard H.. 2012. The Law of Democracy. 4th ed. Eagan, MN: Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 1990. The Electoral Origins of Divided Government: Competition in US House Elections, 1946–1988. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 2013. Partisan Polarization in American Politics: A Background Paper. Presidential Studies Quarterly 43 (4):688–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jillson, Calvin C. 1988. Constitution Making: Conflict and Consensus in the Federal Convention of 1787. New York: Agathon Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Kevin R. 2003. Mixed Race America and the Law: A Reader: New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Ron, Pattie, Charles J., Rossiter, David, Dorling, Danny, MacAllister, Iain, and Tunstall, Helena. 2007. New Labour's Landslide and Electoral Bias: An Exploration of Differences between the 1997 UK Election Result and the Previous Thirteen. British Elections and Party Review 9 (1):20–45.Google Scholar
Johnson, Ron, Rossiter, David, and Pattie, Charles J.. 2006. Disproportionality and Bias in the Results of the 2005 General Election in Great Britain: Evaluating the Electoral System's Impact. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 16 (1):37–54.Google Scholar
King, Gary. 1989. Representation through Legislative Redistricting: A Stochastic Model. American Journal of Political Science 33 (4):787–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary, and Browning, Robert X.. 1987. Democratic Representation and Partisan Bias in Congressional Elections. American Political Science Review 81 (4):1251–1273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary, and Gelman, Andrew. 1991. Systemic Consequences of Incumbency Advantage in United-States House Elections. American Journal of Political Science 35 (1):110–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary, Grofman, Bernard, Gelman, Andrew, and Katz, Jonathon. 2006. Brief of Amici Curiae Professors Gary King, Bernard Grofman, Andrew Gelman, and Jonathan N. Katz, in Support of Neither Party. For the case of LULAC v. Perry.
Ladewig, Jeffrey W., and Jasinski, Matthew P.. 2008. On the Causes and Consequences of and Remedies for Interstate Malapportionment of the US House of Representatives. Perspectives on Politics 6 (1):89–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layman, Geoffrey C., Carsey, Thomas M., and Horowitz, Juliana Menasce. 2006. Party Polarization in American Politics: Characteristics, Causes, and Consequences. Annual Review of Political Science 9:83–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levendusky, Matthew S. 2009. The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Republicans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitt, Justin. 2014. Color by Numbers: The New Misreading of the Voting Rights Act. Rochester, NY: Loyola-LA Legal Studies Paper.Google Scholar
Lowenstein, Daniel. 1990. Bandemer's Gap Gerrymandering and Equal Protection. In Political Gerrymandering and the Courts, edited by Grofman, B.. New York: Agathon Press.Google Scholar
Lowenstein, Daniel, and Steinberg, Jonathan. 1985. The Quest for Legislative Districting in the Public Interest: Elusive or Illusory. UCLA Law Review 33 (1):1–75.Google Scholar
Lublin, David. 1997. The Paradox of Representation: Racial Gerrymandering and Minority Interests in Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Madison, James. 1966. Notes of Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787 Reported by James Madison. Athens: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
Martinez, Michael D., and Gill, Jeff. 2005. The Effects of Turnout on Partisan Outcomes in US Presidential Elections 1960–2000. Journal of Politics 67 (4):1248–1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, Kenneth. 1951. A Set of Independent Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Simple Majority Decision. Econometrica 20:680–684.Google Scholar
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith, and Rosenthal, Howard. 2006. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McDonald, Michael P. 2004. A Comparative Analysis of U.S. State Redistricting Institutions. State Politics and Policy Quarterly 4 (4):371–396.Google Scholar
McDonald, Michael P. 2006. Seats to Votes Ratios in the United States. In Plurality and Multi-Round Electoral Systems. Center for the Study of Democracy. Irvine:University of California Press.Google Scholar
McDonald, Michael P. 2011. The 2010 Midterm Elections: Signs and Portents for the Decennial Redistricting. PS-Political Science & Politics 44 (2):311–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, Michael P. 2013. Geography Does Not Necessarily Lead to Pro-Republican Gerrymandering. In Huffington Post, July 1, 2013. www.huffingotn.com/Michael-p-mcdonald/geography-does-not-necess_b_3530099.html.
McKee, Seth C., and Teigen, Jeremy M.. 2009. Probing the Reds and Blues: Sectionalism and Voter Location in the 2000 and 2004 U. S. Presidential elections. Political Geography 28 (8):484–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
New York Times. 2004. Elections with No Meaning. The New York Times, February 21, 2004 www.nytimes.com/2004/02/21/opinoin/elections-with-no-meaning.html?_r=0.
Niemi, Richard G., Grofman, Bernard, Carlucci, Carl, and Hofeller, Thomas. 1990. Measuring Compactness and the Role of a Compactness Standard in a Test for Partisan and Racial Gerrymandering. Journal of Politics 52 (4):1155–1181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nir, David. 2008. Presidential Results by Congressional District, 2000–2008. Swing State Project 2008 [cited July 21, 2015]. Available from http://www.swingstateproject.com/diary/4161/presidential-results-by-congressional-district-20002008.
Nir, David. 2012. Daily Kos Elections' presidential results by congressional district for the 2012 and 2008 elections. Daily Kos 2012 [cited July 21, 2015]. Available from http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/11/19/1163009/-Daily-Kos-Elections-presidential-results-by-congressional-district-for-the-2012--2008-elections.
Percival, Garrick L., Currin-Percival, Mary, Bowler, Shaun, and Kolk, Henk van der. 2007. Taxing, Spending, and Voting: Voter Turnout Rates in Statewide Elections in Comparative Perspective. State and Local Government Review 39 (3):131–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkins, Alec. 2014. FairDistrict.US 2014 [cited November 6, 2014]. Available from fairdistrict.us.
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2007. Ideology and Congress. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
The Public Mapping Project, Michael, Altman, McDonald, Michael P., and Azavea, . 2014. District Builder. www.publicmapping.org.
Puppe, Clemens, and Tasnadi, Attila. 2009. Optimal Redistricting under Geographical Constraints: Why “Pack and Crack” Does Not Work. Economics Letters 105 (1):93–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rae, Douglas. 1967. The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Reif, Karlheinz, and Schmitt, Hermann. 1980. 9 2nd-Order National Elections – a Conceptual-Framework for the Analysis of European Election Results. European Journal of Political Research 8 (1):3–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shotts, Kenneth W. 2001. The Effect of Majority-Minority Mandates on Partisan Gerrymandering. American Journal of Political Science 45 (1):120–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soroka, Stuart Neil, and Wlezien, Christopher. 2010. Degrees of Democracy: Politics, Public Opinion, and Policy. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stephanopoulos, Nicholas O., and McGee, Eric M.. 2015. Partisan Gerrymandering and the Efficiency Gap. University of Chicago Law Review 82:831. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2457468.Google Scholar
Taagepera, Rein, Selb, Peter, and Grofman, Bernard. 2013. How Turnout Depends on the Number of Parties: A Logical Model. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties (forthcoming):1–21.Google Scholar
Taagepera, Rein, and Shugart, Matthew. 1989. Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tam Cho, Wendy K., Gimpel, James G., and Hui, Iris S.. 2012. Voter Migration and the Geographic Sorting of the American Electorate. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 103 (4):856–870.Google Scholar
Theriault, Sean M. 2008. Party Polarization in Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thrasher, Michael, Borisyuk, Galina, Rallings, Colin, and Johnson, Ron. 2011. Electoral Bias at the 2010 General Election: Evaluating Its Extent in a Three-Party System. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 21 (2):279–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tufte, Edward. 1973. The Relationship between Seats and Votes in Two-Party Systems. American Political Science Review 67 (2):540–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weissberg, Robert. 1978. Collective vs. Dyadic Representation in Congress. American Political Science Review 72 (2):535–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, Stephen. 2012. What if We Had Non-Gerrymandered Redistricting Nationwide? The Daily Kos, August 6, 2012 [cited July 21, 2015]. Available from http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/08/06/1115538/-What-if-We-Had-Non-Partisan-Redistricting-Nationwide.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×