Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T05:40:18.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Women's Civic Inclusion and the Bill of Rights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2012

By
Gretchen Ritter
Edited by
Linda C. McClain  and
Joanna L. Grossman
Linda C. McClain
Affiliation:
Boston University
Joanna L. Grossman
Affiliation:
Hofstra University, New York
Get access

Summary

The Bill of Rights is often treated as the foundation of America's rights-conscious culture. Prior to the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment, it was the Bill that most clearly delineated the relationship between “the People” of the Constitution and the federal government. Before the terms of citizenship were defined by the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments, it was the Bill that provided a vision of democratic community and liberty for those governed by the American constitutional order. Since the conclusion of the Civil War, the terms of U.S. citizenship have been anchored in both the Bill and the Reconstruction Amendments. The Bill continues to play a vital role in shaping the terms of American citizenship today.

Given this account and this history, it seems odd that women's rights advocates have largely avoided the Bill in their efforts to advance rights and civic inclusion for women. Civic inclusion here refers to democratic engagement and the political recognition of the rights and interests of citizens as individuals and members of groups under the Constitution. Instead, women's rights advocates have turned primarily to the Fourteenth Amendment in their efforts to bolster women's individual rights and civic standing under the American constitution. This chapter reconsiders the problematic relationship of women's rights advocates to the Bill and contends that the Bill has historically served as both an instrument for preserving gender hierarchy and as a foundation for claims of public voice for women.

Type
Chapter
Information
Gender Equality
Dimensions of Women's Equal Citizenship
 , pp. 60 - 82
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brennan, Jr. William J., “Why Have a Bill of Rights?,” 9 Oxford J. Legal Stud.425, 425–40 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritter, Gretchen, The Constitution as Social Design: Gender and Civic Membership in the American Constitutional Order (Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 2006)Google Scholar
Becker, Mary, “The Politics of Women's Wrongs and the Bill of ‘Rights’: A Bicentennial Perspective,” 59 U. Chi. L. Rev.453 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foner, Eric, The Story of American Freedom (New York: W. W. Norton, 1998)Google Scholar
Amar, Akhil Reed, “The Bill of Rights as a Constitution,” 100 Yale L. J.1131 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treanor, William Michael, “Taking Text Too Seriously: Modern Textualism, Original Meaning, and the Case for Amar's Bill of Rights,” 106 Mich. L. Rev.487 (2007)Google Scholar
Morgan, Edmund, Inventing the People: The Rise of Popular Sovereignty in England and America (New York: W. W. Norton, 1988)Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen, The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry Into a Category of Bourgeois Society (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1989)Google Scholar
Anderson, Benedict, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (London: Verso, 1983)Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert, A Democratic Critique of the American Constitution (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2001), at 135Google Scholar
Shachar, Ayelet, “Religion, State, and the Problem of Gender: New Modes of Citizenship and Governance in Diverse Societies,” 50 McGill L. J.49 (2005)Google Scholar
Barry, Brian, Culture and Equality (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001)Google Scholar
McDonagh, Eileen, “Political Citizenship and Democratization: The Gender Paradox,” 96 Am. Pol. Sci. Rev.535 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartog, Hendrik, “The Constitution of Aspiration and the Rights That Belong to Us All,” 74 J. Am. Hist.1013, 1017 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amar, Akhil Reed, The Bill of Rights: Creation and Reconstruction (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
Skrentny, John, The Minority Rights Revolution (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002)Google Scholar
Kryder, Daniel, Divided Arsenal: Race and the American State During World War II (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Dudziak, Mary, Cold War Civil Rights: Race and the Image of American Democracy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Hart, Jane Sherron, “Containment at Home: Gender, Sexuality, and National Identity in Cold War America,” in Kuznick, Peter and Gilbert, James, eds., Rethinking Cold War Culture (Washington, DC: Smithsonian, 2001)Google Scholar
MacLean, Nancy, Freedom Is Not Enough (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006)Google ScholarPubMed
Witte, John, “The Essential Rights and Liberties of Religion in the American Constitutional Experiment,” 71 Notre Dame L. Rev.371, 384 (1996)Google Scholar
Amar, Akhil Reed, “Some Notes on the Establishment Clause,” 2 Roger Williams U. L. Rev.1 (1996)Google Scholar
Withington, Ann and Schwartz, Jack, “The Political Trial of Anne Hutchinson,” 51 New Eng. Q.226, 227 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Edmund, “The Case Against Anne Hutchinson,” 10 New Eng. Q.635, 636 (1937)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cott, Nancy, “Young Women in the Second Great Awakening in New England,” 3 Fem. Stud.15, 21 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanton, Elizabeth Cady et al., eds., 2 History of Woman Suffrage (Rochester, NY: 1881–1922)
Pateman, Carole, The Sexual Contract (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1988)Google Scholar
Ezer, Tamar, “A Positive Right to Protection for Children,” 7 Yale Hum. Rts. and Dev. L. J., 1 (2004)Google Scholar
Dailey, Anne, “Developing Citizens,” 91 Iowa L. Rev.431 (2006)Google Scholar
Chafetz, Josh, “Social Reproduction and Religious Reproduction: A Democratic-Communitarian Analysis of the Yoder Problem,” 15 Wm. and Mary Bill Rts. J.263 (2006)Google Scholar
Biedrzycki, Lisa, “‘Conformed to the World’: A Challenge to the Continued Justification of the Wisconsin v. Yoder Education Exception in a Changed Old Order Amish Society,” 79 Temple L. Rev.249 (2006)Google Scholar
Morone, James, Hellfire Nation: The Politics of Sin in American History (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Constable, Marianne, The Law of the Other: The Mixed Jury and Changing Conceptions of Citizenship, Law and Knowledge (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994)Google Scholar
Rossiter, Clinton, ed., The Federalist Papers (New York: Penguin, 1961), at 499
Tocqueville, Alexis, Democracy in America (New York: Knopf, 1945), at 283Google Scholar
Alschuler, Albert and Deiss, Andrew, “A Brief History of the Criminal Jury in the United States,” 61 U. Chi. L. Rev., 867, 877 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisbrod, Carol, “Images of the Woman Juror,” 9 Harv. Women's L. J.59, 60 (1986)Google Scholar
Ritter, Gretchen, “Jury Service and Women's Citizenship Before and After the Nineteenth Amendment,” 20 L. and Hist. Rev.479 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Jennifer K., “The Nineteenth Amendment and Women's Equality,” 102 Yale L. J.2175 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babcock, Barbara Allen, “A Place in the Palladium: Women's Rights and Jury Service,” 61 U. Cin. L. Rev.1139 (1993)Google Scholar
Grossman, Joanna L., “Women's Jury Service: Right of Citizenship or Privilege of Difference?,” 46 Stan. L. Rev.1115, 1138–39 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerber, Linda, No Constitutional Right to Be Ladies: Women and the Obligations of Citizenship (New York: Hill and Wang, 1998)Google Scholar
Amar, Vikram David, “Jury Service as Political Participation Akin to Voting,” 801 Cornell L. Rev.203 (1995)Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy, States of Injury (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×