Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-03T06:40:48.969Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Citizenship and Women's Election to Political Office: The Power of Gendered Public Policies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2012

Linda C. McClain
Affiliation:
Boston University
Joanna L. Grossman
Affiliation:
Hofstra University, New York
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The United States lags far behind most comparable democracies when it comes to women's election to national political office. This research explains that deficiency as resulting from the failure of the American state to adopt public policies representing maternal traits voters associate with women, in contrast to most other democracies that do. Such policies teach voters that the maternal characteristics associated with women signify a location not only in the home, but also in the public sphere of political governance. When such policies are in place, public attitudes about the suitability of women as political leaders improve, and women's election to political office increases.

Defining Citizenship

Citizenship

One of the most fundamental precepts of democratic theory and practice is citizenship. An enduring definition of citizenship dates back to the work of British sociologist T. H. Marshall. In his view, “citizenship is a status bestowed on those who are full members of a community. All who possess the status are equal with respect to the rights and duties with which the status is endowed.” Thus, the idea behind citizenship is inclusion. Marshall is noted for developing a typology based on three principles of inclusion: civil citizenship, political citizenship, and social citizenship.

By civil citizenship, Marshall meant that individuals are included in the community by virtue of having the legal rights necessary to exercise “individual freedom – liberty of the person, freedom of speech, thought and faith, the right to own property and to conclude valid contracts and the right to justice…[which] is the right to defend and assert one's rights on terms of equality with others and by due process of law.

Type
Chapter
Information
Gender Equality
Dimensions of Women's Equal Citizenship
, pp. 201 - 230
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Marshall, T. H., Citizenship and Social Class (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1950), at 24Google Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L. and Fox, Richard L., It Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don't Run for Office (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa, ed., Passages to Power: Legislative Recruitment in Advanced Democracies (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997)
Matland, Richard E. and Taylor, Michelle M., “Electoral System Effects on Women's Representation: Theoretical Arguments and Evidence From Costa Rica,” 30 Comp. Pol. Stud.186 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, Susan and Studlar, Donley T., “Multi-member Districts and the Representation of Women: Evidence From Britain and the United States,” 52 J. Pol.391 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonagh, Eileen, The Motherless State: Women's Political Leadership and American Democracy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenner, Johanna and Laslett, Barbara, “Gender, Social Reproduction and Women's Political Self-Organization,” 5 Gender and Soc'y314 (1991)Google Scholar
Herrnson, Paul S. et al., “Women Running ‘as Women’: Candidate Gender, Campaign Issues, and Voter-Targeting Strategies,” 65 J. Pol.244, 245 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude, “Gender Quotas: Controversial but Trendy,” 10:3 Int'l Feminist J. Pol.322 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krook, Mona, “Candidate Gender Quotas: A Framework for Analysis,” 46:3 Eur. J. Pol. Res.367 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paxton, Pamela et al., “Gender in Politics,” 33 Annu. Rev. Sociol. 263 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caul, Miki, “Political Parties and the Adoption of Candidate Gender Quotas: A Cross-National Analysis,” 63 J. Pol.1214 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Htun, Mala, “Is Gender Like Ethnicity? The Political Representation of Identity Groups,” 2 Persps. Pol.439 (2004)Google Scholar
Bogdanor, Vernon, The Monarchy and the Constitution (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995)Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catherine, Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988)Google Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy J., “Freedom, Recognition, and Obligation: A Feminist Approach to Political Theory,” 83 Am. Pol. Sci. Rev.1227, 1229 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClain, Linda, The Place of Families: Fostering Capacity, Equality, and Responsibility (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006)Google Scholar
Schuck, Peter H. and Smith, Rogers M., Citizenship Without Consent: Illegal Aliens in the American Polity (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1985)Google Scholar
O'Brien, Ruth, Bodies in Revolt: Gender, Disability and a Workplace Ethic of Care (New York: Routledge, 2005)Google Scholar
Duerst-Lahti, Georgia and Kelly, Rita Mae, eds., Gender, Power, Leadership and Governance (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1996)CrossRef
Tolleson-Rinehart, Sue and Josephson, Jyl J., eds., Gender and American Politics: Women, Men, and the Political Process (Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 2000)
Burns, Nancy et al., The Private Roots of Public Action: Gender, Equality, and Political Participation (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Phillips, Ann, Democracy and Difference (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1993), at 106Google Scholar
Rosenbluth, Frances et al., “Welfare Works: Explaining Female Legislative Representation,” 2 Pol. and Gender165 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witt, Linda et al., Running as a Woman: Gender and Power in American Politics (New York, NY: The Free Press, 1995)Google Scholar
Clark, Janet, “Getting There: Women in Political Office,” in Githens, Marianne et al., (eds), Different Roles, Different Voices (New York: Harper Collins, 1994), at 105–6Google Scholar
Phillips, Anne, “Dealing With Difference: A Politics of Ideas, or a Politics of Difference?,” in Benhabib, Seyla, ed., Democracy and Difference (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993)Google Scholar
Hedlund, Ronald D. et al., “The Electability of Women Candidates: The Effects of Sex Role Stereotypes,” 41 J. Pol.513 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolbrecht, Christina, The Politics of Women's Rights: Parties, Positions, and Change (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, Kira, “Political Parties and the Recruitment of Women to State Legislatures,” 64 J. Pol.791 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Susan J., Women as Candidates in American Politics (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1985)Google Scholar
Burrell, Barbara C., A Woman's Place Is in the House (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1994)Google Scholar
Darcy, R. et al., Women, Elections and Representation (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1996), at 92–93Google Scholar
Richter, Linda K., “Exploring Theories of Female Leadership in South and Southeast Asia,” 63 Pac. Aff.524, 532–33 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weldon, Laurel, “Beyond Bodies: Institutional Sources of Representation for Women in Democratic Policymaking,” 64 J. Pol.1153 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vengroff, Richard et al., “Electoral System and Gender Representation in Sub-national Legislatures: Is There a National Gender Gap?,” 56 Pol. Res. Q.163 (2003)Google Scholar
Bih-Er, Chou et al., Women in Taiwan Politics: Overcoming Barriers to Women's Participation in a Modernizing Society (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1990), at 96, 153Google Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena, “Reforming Representation: The Diffusion of Candidate Gender Quotas Worldwide,” 2 Pol. and Gender303 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni, Women and European Politics (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1986)Google Scholar
Paxton, Pamela, “Women in National Legislatures: A Cross-National Analysis,” 26 Soc. Sci. Res.442 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×