Accattino, P., 1994. ‘Galeno e la reproduzione animale: Analisi del De semine’, in Haase, and Temporini, II.37.2: 1865–86.

Agrifoglio, L., 1961. Galeno e il problema del metodo. Bergamo.Google Scholar

Alexander, L., 1993. The Preface to Luke's Gospel: Literary Convention and Social Context in Luke 1.1–4 and Acts 1.1. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allen, J., 1994. ‘Failure and Expertise in the Ancient Conception of an Art’, in Horowitz, T. and Janis, A. I. (eds.), Scientific Failure. Lanham, MA: 81–108.Google Scholar

Allen, J., 2001. Inference from Signs: Ancient Debates about the Nature of Evidence. Oxford.Google Scholar

Anastassiou, A. and Irmer, D., 1997–2006. Testimonien zum Corpus Hippocraticum (3 vols.). Göttingen.Google Scholar

Arnim, H., 1903–5. Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta. 3 vols. Indices (vol. 4) M. Adler.Leipzig 1924. Reprint (4 vols.) 2004. Munich.Google Scholar

Asper, M., 2007. Griechische Wissenschaftstexte: Formen, Funktionen, Differenzierungsgeschichten, Philosophie der Antike vol. XXV. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Babut, D., 1969. Plutarque et le stoïcisme. Paris.Google Scholar

Babut, D., 1994a. Parerga: Choix d'articles de Daniel Babut (1974–1994). Lyon.Google Scholar

Babut, D., 1994b. ‘Du scepticisme au dépassement de la raison: philosophie et foi religieuse chez Plutarque’, in Babut 1994a: 549–81.

Baltes, M., 1976. Die Weltenstehung des platonischen Timaios nach den antiken Interpreten. (vol. I). Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barigazzi, A., 1991. Galeni De optimo docendi genere, Exhortatio ad medicinam (Protrepticus), edited with a translation. CMG V.1.1. Berlin.Google Scholar

Barnes, J., 1979. The Presocratic Philosophers. (2 vols.). London.Google Scholar

Barnes, J., 1980. ‘Proof Destroyed’, in Barnes et al. 1980: 161–81.

Barnes, J., 1983. ‘Ancient Skepticism and Causation’, in Burnyeat, M. F. (ed.), The Skeptical Tradition. Berkeley: 149–203.Google Scholar

Barnes, J., 1990. The Toils of Scepticism. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Barnes, J., 1991. ‘Galen on Logic and Therapy’, in Kudlien and Durling: 50–102.

Barnes, J., 1993a. ‘“A Third Sort of Syllogism”: Galen and the Logic of Relations’, in Sharples, R. W. (ed.), Modern Thinkers and Ancient Thinkers. London: 172–94.Google Scholar

Barnes, J., 1993b. ‘Galen on the Utility of Logic’, in Kollesch and Nickel: 33–52.

Barnes, J., 1994. Aristotle: Posterior Analytics, with translation and commentary. Clarendon Aristotle Series. Oxford.Google Scholar

Barnes, J., 1997a. Logic and the Imperial Stoa. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnes, J., 1997b. ‘Logique et pharmacologie: à propos de quelques remarques d'ordre linguistique dans le De simplicium medicamentorum temperamentis ac facultatibus de Galien’, in Debru 1997: 3–33.

Barnes, J., 2003. ‘Proofs and Syllogisms in Galen’, in Barnes and Jouanna: 1–24. (‘Discussion’: 25–9).

Barnes, J., Burnyeat, M. F. and Schofield, M. (eds.), 1980. Doubt and Dogmatism. Oxford.

Barnes, J. and Jouanna, J. (eds.), 2003. Galien et la philosophie, Fondation Hardt Entretiens sur l'Antiquité Classique vol. XLIX. Vandoeuvres-Geneva.

Barton, T. S., 1994. Power and Knowledge: Astrology, Physiognomics and Medicine under the Roman Empire. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar

Bartsch, S., 1997. Ideology in Cold Blood: A Reading of Lucan's Civil War. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Berthier, J., 1972. Mnésithée et Dieuchès. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berthier, J., (ed.), 1978. Nicomaque de Gérase: Introduction arithmétique. Paris.

Blanck, H., 1992. Das Buch in der Antike. Munich.Google Scholar

Bliquez, L., 1984. ‘Two Lists of Greek Surgical Instruments and the State of Surgery in Byzantine Times’, Symposium on Byzantine Medicine, Dumbarton Oaks Papers 38: 187–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bobzien, S., 1998. Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy. Oxford.Google Scholar

Bobzien, S. and Mignucci, M., 1999. ‘Logic: The Stoics’, in Algra, K., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J. and Schofield, M. (eds.), Cambridge History of Hellenic Philosophy. Cambridge: 92–176.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M., 2000. ‘Review of Opsomer 1998’, Elenchos 21: 437–44.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M., 2003. Academici e Platonici: Il dibattito antico sullo scetticismo di Platone. Milan.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M., 2004. ‘Contro la rappresentazione sensibile: Plutarco tra l'Academia e il Platonismo’, Elenchos 25: 41–71.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. and Celluprica, V. (eds.), 2005. L'eredità platonica: Studi sul platonismo da Arcesilao a Proclo. Naples.

Boudon-Millot, V., 1993. ‘Médecine et enseignement dans l'Art Médical de Galien’, Revue des Études Grecques 103: 120–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boudon-Millot, V., 1994–5. ‘L'apport des sources arabes à la biographie de Galien’, in Brunet, P. and Noël, M.-P. (eds.), Vies anciennes d'auteurs grecs: Mythe et biographie, Archipel égéen, n.s. l: 61–79.

Boudon-Millot, V., (ed.), 2000a. Galien: Exhortation à l'étude de la médecine, Art médical, texte établi et traduit. Paris.

Boudon-Millot, V., 2000b. ‘Galien de Pergame’, in Goulet, R. (ed.), Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques III. Paris: 440–66.Google Scholar

Boudon-Millot, V., 2002. ‘Galen's On My Own Books: New Material from Meshed, Rida, tibb. 5223’, in Nutton 2002: 9–18.

Boudon-Millot, V., 2003a. ‘Aux marges de la médecine rationnelle: médecins et charlatans à Rome au temps de Galien’, Revue des Études Grecques 116: 109–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boudon-Millot, V., 2003b. ‘Art, science et conjecture chez Galien’, in Barnes and Jouanna: 269–98 (‘Discussion’ 299–305).

Boudon-Millot, V., 2004. ‘Oral et écrit chez Galien’, in Jouanna, J. and Lechaut, J. (eds.), La Médecine grecque antique: Cahiers de la Villa ‘Kérylos’. Académie des Inscriptions et Belles Lettres. Paris: 199–218.Google Scholar

Boudon-Millot, V., (ed.), 2007a. Galien, tome I: Introduction génerale, Sur l'ordre de ses propres livres, Sur ses propres livres, Que l'excellent médecin est aussi philosophe, texte établi et traduit. Paris.

Boudon-Millot, V., 2007b. ‘Un traité miraculeusement retrouvé, Sur l'inutilité de se chagriner: texte grec et traduction française’, in Boudon-Millot, Guardasole and Magdelaine: 73–124.

Boudon-Millot, V., Guardasole, A. and Magdelaine, C. (eds.), 2007. La Science médicale antique: nouveaux regards: études réunies en l'honneur de Jacques Jouanna. Paris.

Boudon-Millot, V. and Pietrobelli, A., 2005. ‘Galien ressuscité: Édition princeps du texte grec du De propriis placitis’, Revue des Etudies Grecques 118: 168–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bouchier, A. D., Ellis, H. and Fleming, P. R., 1996. French's Index of Differential Diagnosis (1st edn. H. French, 1912, An Index of Differential Diagnosis and Main Symptoms) 13th edn. Oxford.Google Scholar

Bowersock, G. W., 1969. Greek Sophists in the Roman Empire. Oxford.Google Scholar

Boylan, M., 1984. ‘The Galenic and Hippocratic Challenges to Aristotle's Conception Theory’, Journal of the History of Biology 17: 83–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Boys-Stones, G., 2005. ‘Alcinous, Didaskalikos 4: In Defence of Dogmatism’, in Bonazzi and Celluprica: 201–34.Google Scholar

Brain, P., 1986. Galen on Bloodletting: A Study of the Origins, Development and Validity of his Opinions, with a Translation of the Three Works. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braund, D. and Wilkins, J. (eds.), 2000. Athenaeus and his World: Reading Greek Culture in the Roman Empire. Exeter.

Brittain, C., 2001. Philo of Larissa: The Last of the Academic Sceptics. Oxford.Google Scholar

Brittain, C., 2005. ‘Common Sense: Concepts, Definition and Meaning in and out the Stoa’, in Frede, D. and Inwood, B. (eds.), Language and Learning: Philosophy of Language in the Hellenistic Age. Cambridge: 164–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brock, A. J., 1916. Galen: On the Natural Faculties. Text, translation and notes. (Loeb Classical Library). Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Bröcker, L. O., 1885. ‘Die Methoden Galens in der literarischen Kritik’, Rheinisches Museum 40: 415–38.Google Scholar

Brunschwig, J., 1980. ‘Proof Defined’, in Barnes, Burnyeat and Schofield: 125–60.

Brunt, P. A., 1994. ‘The Bubble of the Second Sophistic’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 38: 25–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burnyeat, M. F., 1982. ‘The Origins of Non-Deductive Inference’, in Barnes, J., Brunschwig, J., Burnyeat, M. and Schofield, M. (eds.), Science and Speculation. Cambridge: 193–238.Google Scholar

Cambiano, G., 2000. ‘Galeno, Erasistrato e la teleologia di Aristotele’, in Manetti, D. (ed.) Studi su Galeno. Florence: 45–57.Google Scholar

Carey, S., 2003. Pliny's Catalogue of Culture. Art and Empire in the Natural History. Oxford.Google Scholar

Carriker, A., 2003. The Library of Eusebius of Caesarea. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cassio, A. C., 1991. ‘Parlate locali, dialetti delle stirpi e fonti letterarie nei grammatici greci’, in Dialectologia graeca, Actas del II Coloquio Internacional de Dialectologia griega. Madrid: 73–90.Google Scholar

Cassio, A. C., 1996. ‘La prose ionienne postclassique et la culture de l'Asie Mineure à l’époque Hellénistique', in Brixhe, C. (ed.), La Koiné grecque antique, II. Nancy: 147–70.Google Scholar

Casson, L., 2001. Libraries in the Ancient World. New Haven, CT.Google Scholar

Cavallo, G. (ed.), 1988. Le Biblioteche nel mondo antico e medievale. Bari.

Cellucci, C., 2005. ‘Mathematical Discourse vs. Mathematical Intuition’, in Cellucci, C. and Gillies, D. (eds.), Mathematical Reasoning and Heuristics. London: 137–65.Google Scholar

Charlesworth, M., 1936. ‘Providentia and Aeternitas’, Harvard Theological Review 29: 107–132.Google Scholar

Chiaradonna, R., 2003. ‘Il tempo misura del movimento? Plotino e Aristotele (Enn. III 7 [45])’, in Bonazzi, M. and Trabattoni, F. (eds.), Platone e la tradizione platonica: Studi di filosofia antica. Milan: 221–50.Google Scholar

Chiaradonna, R., 2005. ‘Plotino e la corrente antiaristotelica del platonismo imperiale: analogie e differenze’, in Bonazzi and Celluprica: 235–74.

Chiaradonna, R., 2009. ‘Le traité de Galien Sur la Démonstration et sa postérité, tardo-antique’, in Chiaradonna, R. and Trabattoni, F. (eds.), Physics and Philosophy of Nature in Greek Neoplatonism. Leiden: 43–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, D. M., 1982. Descartes' Philosophy of Science. University Park, PA.Google Scholar

Cobet, C. G., 1885. ‘Ad Galenum’, Mnemosyne, n.s.13: 248.Google Scholar

Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R. and Murdoch, D. (eds.), 1985. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes (vol. I.). Cambridge.

Croissant, J., 1986. ‘Autour de la quatrième formule d'implication dans Sextus Empiricus, Hyp.pyrrh. 112: essai de mise au point’, in Croissant, J., Études de philosophie ancienne. Brussels: 297–345.Google Scholar

Cuomo, S., 2001. Ancient Mathematics. London.Google Scholar

Boer, W. (ed.), 1937. Galeni de animi affectuum et peccatorum dignotione et curatione, de atra bile. CMG V.4.1.1. Berlin.

Debru, A., 1991. ‘Expérience, plausibilité et certitude chez Galien’, in López Férez (1991b): 31–40.

Debru, A., 1994. ‘L'expérimentation chez Galien’, in Haase, and Temporini, II.37.2: 1718–56.

Debru, A., 1995. ‘Les demonstrations médicales à Rome au temps de Galien’, in Eijk, P. J., Horstmanshoff, H. F. J. and Schrijivers, P. H. (eds.), Ancient Medicine in its Socio-Cultural Context. Leiden: 69–82.Google Scholar

Debru, A., (ed.), 1997. Galen on Pharmacology: Philosophy, History and Medicine. Leiden.

Deichgräber, K., 1933. ‘Review of J. Raeder's edition of Oribasius’, Gnomon 9, 600–7.Google Scholar

Deichgräber, K., 1956. ‘Parabasenverse aus Thesmophoriazusen II des Aristophanes bei Galen’, Sitzungsberichte der Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin.Google Scholar

Deichgräber, K., 1965. Die griechische Empirikerschule: Sammlung der Fragmente und Darstellung der Lehre, 2nd edn. Berlin.Google Scholar

Deichgräber, K., (ed.), 1972. Hippokrates' ‘De humoribus’ in der Geschichte der griechischen Medizin, Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur, Mainz, Abhandlungen der geistes- und sozialwissenschaftlichen Klasse XIV.

Lacy, P. H., 1966. ‘Galen and the Greek Poets’, Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 7: 259–66.Google Scholar

Lacy, P. H., 1972. ‘Galen's Platonism’, American Journal of Philology 93: 27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lacy, P. H., (ed.), 1978–84. Galeni de placitis Hippocratis et Platonis (3 vols.). CMG V.4.1.2. Berlin.

Lacy, P. H., 1991. ‘Galen's Response to Scepticism”, Ilinois Classical Studies 16: 283–306.Google Scholar

Lacy, P. H., (ed.), 1992. Galeni de semine. CMG V.3.1. Berlin.

Lacy, P. H., (ed.) 1996. Galeni de elementis ex Hippocrate. CMG V.1.2. Berlin.

Desideri, P., 2000. ‘Galeno come intellettuale’, in Manetti 2000b: 13–29.

des Places, E., 1977. Atticus: Fragments. Paris.Google Scholar

Diels, H. and Heeg, J. (eds.), 1915. Galeni in Hippocratis prognosticum, In Hippocratis de praedictionibus. CMG V.9.2. Berlin.

Dillon, J., 1993. Alcinous: The Handbook of Platonism, with translation and commentary. Clarendon Later Ancient Philosophers. Oxford.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. M. and Long, A. A. (eds.), 1998. The Question of ‘Eclecticism’: Studies in Later Greek Philosophy. Berkeley, CA.

Dionisotti, A. C., 1982. ‘From Ausonius’ Schooldays? A Schoolbook and its Relations', Journal of Roman Studies 2: 83–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donini, P. L., 1970–1. ‘L'anima e gli elementi del de anima di Alessandro di Afrodisia’, Atti dell' Accademie delle Scienze di Torino, Classe di scienze morali, storiche e filologiche 105: 61–107.Google Scholar

Donini, P. L., 1974. Tre studi sull'aristotelismo nel secondo secolo D.C. Turin.Google Scholar

Donini, P. L., 1979. ‘L'eclettismo impossibile: Seneca e il platonismo medio’, in Donini, P. L. and Gianotti, F. (eds.), Modelli filosofici e letterari. Lucrezio, Orazio, Seneca. Bologna: 149–300.Google Scholar

Donini, P. L., 1980. ‘Motivi filosofici in Galeno’, La Parola del Passato 35: 333–70.Google Scholar

Donini, P. L., 1982. Le scuole, l'anima, l'impero: la filosofia antica da Antioco a Plotino. Turin.Google Scholar

Donini, P. L., 1986. ‘Lo scetticismo accademico, Aristotele e l'unità della tradizione platonica secondo Plutarco’, in Cambiano, G. (ed.), Storiografia e dossografia nella filosofia antica. Turin: 203–26.Google Scholar

Donini, P. L., 1988a. ‘Tipologia degli errori e loro correzione in Galeno’, in Manuli and Vegetti 1988: 65–116.

Donini, P. L., 1988b. ‘Science and Metaphysics: Platonism, Aristotelianism, and Stoicism in Plutarch's On the Face in the Moon’, in Dillon and Long: 126–44.

Donini, P. L., 1990. ‘Medioplatonismo e filosofi medioplatonici: una raccolta di studi’, Elenchos 11: 79–93.Google Scholar

Donini, P. L., 1992. ‘Galeno e la filosofia’, in Haase, and Temporini, II.36.5: 3484–504.

Donini, P. L., 1994. ‘Testi e commenti, manuali e insegnamento: la forma sistematica e i metodi della filosofia in età postellenistica’, in Haase, and Temporini, II.36.7: 5027–100.

Donini, P. L., 2002a. ‘L'eredità academica e i fondamenti del platonismo in Plutarco’, in Barbauti, M., Gardinea, G. R. and Manganaso, P. (eds.), ΕΝΩΣΙΣ ΚΑΙ ΦΙΛΙΑ: Unione e amicizia. Omaggio a Francesco Romano. Catania: 247–73.Google Scholar

Donini, P. L., 2002b. ‘Review of Opsomer 1998’, Gnomon 74: 670–2.Google Scholar

Donini, P. L., 2008. ‘Psychology’ in Hankinson 2008b: 184–209.

d'Ooge, M. (ed.), 1926. Nicomachus of Gerasa, Introduction to Arithmetic, translated with studies in Greek arithmetic by Robbins, F. E. and Karpinski, L. C.. New York.

Dorandi, T., 2000. Le stylet et la tablette: dans le secret des auteurs antiques. Paris.Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. and Baltes, M. (eds.), 1996. Der Platonismus in der Antike vol. IV. Stuttgart.

Dörrie, H. and Baltes, M. (eds.), 1998 Der Platonismus in der Antike vol. V. Stuttgart.

Dörrie, H. and Baltes, M. (eds.), 2002. Der Platonismus in der Antike vol. VI.1–2. Stuttgart.

Dubuisson, M., 1976. Οἱ ἀμϕί τινα οἱ περί τινα: L'Évolution des sens et des emplois (diss. Liège).Google Scholar

Duckworth, W. H. L., 1962. Galen on Anatomical Procedures: The Later Books, translated, Lyons, M. C. and Towers, B. (eds.). Cambridge.Google Scholar

Durling, R. J., 1991. ‘Endeixis as a scientific term: (B) Endeixis in authors other than Galen and its Medieval Latin equivalents’, in Kudlien and Durling: 112–13.

Ebert, T., 2005. ‘La théorie de la signe entre la medicine et la philosophie’, in Kany-Turpin: 51–63.

Edelstein, L. and Kidd, I. G. (eds.), 1972. Posidonius, vol. I: The Fragments. Cambridge.

Eijk, P., 1997. ‘Galen's use of the concept of “qualified experience” in his dietetic and pharmacological works’, in Debru 1997: 35–57.

Eijk, P. 1999a. ‘Historical Awareness, Historiography and Doxography in Greek and Roman Medicine’, in van der Eijk (1999b): 1–31.

Eijk, P. (ed.), 1999b. Ancient Histories of Medicine: Essays in Medical Doxography and Historiography in Classical Antiquity. Leiden.

Eijk, P. 2000–1. Diocles of Carystus: A Collection of the Fragments with Translation and Commentary, 2 vols. Leiden.Google Scholar

Eijk, P. 2005a. ‘Introduction’, in van der Eijk 2005b: 1–42.

Eijk, P. 2005b. Medicine and Philosophy in Classical Antiquity. Doctors and Philosophers on Nature, Soul, Health and Disease. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eijk, P. 2005c. Philoponus: On Aristotle On the Soul 1.1–2, with translation and commentary. London.Google Scholar

Eijk, P. 2006. Philoponus: On Aristotle On the Soul 1.3–5, with translation and commentary. London.Google Scholar

Eijk, P. 2008. ‘On Therapeutics’, in Hankinson 2008b: 283–303.

Eijk, P. and Hulskamp, M. A. A., 2009. ‘Stages in the reception of Aristotle's work on sleep and dreams in Hellenistic and Imperial philosophy and medicine’, in Morel, P. (ed.) La réception des Parva Naturalia d'Aristote. Louvain: In press.Google Scholar

Elsner, J., 1992. ‘Pausanias: A Greek Pilgrim in the Roman World’, Past and Present 135: 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elsner, J., 1994. ‘From the Pyramids to Pausanias and Piglet: Monuments, Travel and Writing’, in Goldhill, S. and Osborne, R. (eds.), Art and Text in Ancient Greek Culture. Cambridge: 224–54.Google Scholar

Fabricius, C., 1972. Galens Exzerpte aus älteren Pharmakologen, Ars Medica II.2. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fantham, E., 1982. ‘Quintilian on Performance. Traditional and Personal Elements in Institutio 11.3’, Phoenix 36: 243–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferrari, F., 1998. ‘Galeno Interprete del Timeo’, Museum Helveticum 55: 14–34.Google Scholar

Ferrari, F., (ed.), 2002. Plutarco: La generazione dell'anima nel Timeo, with translation and commentary. Naples.

Festugière, A. J., 1952. ‘Le Compendium Timaei de Galien’, Revue des Études Grecques 65: 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flemming, R., 2000. Medicine and the Making of Roman Women. Oxford.Google Scholar

Flemming, R., 2002. ‘The Pathology of Pregnancy in Galen's Commentaries on the Epidemics’, in Nutton 2002: 101–12.

Flemming, R., 2003. ‘Empires of Knowledge: Medicine and Health in the Hellenistic World’, in Erskine, A. (ed.), A Companion to the Hellenistic World. Oxford: 449–63.Google Scholar

Flemming, R., 2007. ‘Galen's Imperial Order of Knowledge’, in König and Whitmarsh 2007b: 241–77.

Flemming, R., 2008. ‘Commentary’, in Hankinson 2008b: 323–54.

Fögen, T., 2003. ‘Metasprachliche Reflexionen antiker Autoren zu den Charakteristika von Fachtexten und Fachsprachen’, in Horster, M. and Reitz, C. (eds.) Antike Fachschriftsteller: Literarischer Diskurs und sozialer Kontext. Stuttgart: 31–60.Google Scholar

Formisano, M., 2001. Tecnica e scrittura: Le letterature tecnico-scientifiche nello spazio letterario tardolatino. Rome.Google Scholar

Fortuna, S., ed., 1997. Galeni de constitutione artis medicae ad Patrophilum. CMG V.1.3. Berlin.

Fowler, H. N., 1936. Plutarch: Moralia (vol. X, translated with introduction and notes). Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Frede, M., 1974. Die stoische Logik. Abhandlungen der Akademie des wissenschaften in Göttingen. Philol.-hist. Kl. Folge 3, Nr. 88. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Frede, M. 1981. ‘On Galen's Epistemology’, in Nutton 1981: 65–86 = Frede (1987c).

Frede, M. 1982. ‘On the Method of the So-called Methodical School of Medicine’, in Barnes, J., Burnyeat, M. and Schofield, M. (eds.), Science and Speculation. Cambridge: 1–23. Reprinted in Frede 1987a: 261–78.Google Scholar

Frede, M. 1985. ‘Introduction’, in Walzer and Frede 1985: ix–xxxvi.

Frede, M. 1986. ‘Philosophy and Medicine in Antiquity’, in Donagan, A., Perovich, A. N. and Wedin, M. V. (eds.), Human Nature and Natural Knowledge: Essays presented to Marjorie Grene. Dordrecht: 211–32. Reprinted in Frede 1987a: 201–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frede, M. 1987a. Essays in Ancient Philosophy. Oxford.Google Scholar

Frede, M. 1987b. ‘Numenius’, in Haase, and Temporini, II.36.2: 1034–75.

Frede, M. 1987c. ‘On Galen's Epistemology’, in Frede 1987a: 279–98.

Frede, M. 1987d. ‘The Ancient Empiricists’, in Frede 1987a: 243–60.

Frede, M. 1988. ‘The Empiricist Attitude towards Reason and Theory’, in Hankinson, R. J. (ed.), Method, Medicine and Metaphysics: Apeiron (supp. vol. 21): 79–97.

Frede, M. 1990. ‘An Empiricist View of Knowledge: Memorism’, in Everson, S. (ed.) Epistemology, Companions to Ancient Thought (vol. I). Cambridge: 225–50.Google Scholar

Frede, M. 2003. ‘Galen's Theology’, in Barnes and Jouanna: 73–126. (‘Discussion’: 126–9).

French, R., 1994. Ancient Natural History: Histories of Nature. London.Google Scholar

Fried, M., 1987. Realism, Writing, Disfiguration: On Thomas Eakins and Stephen Crane. Chicago, IL.Google Scholar

Furley, D. J. and Wilkie, J. S., 1984. Galen on Respiration and the Arteries. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Garber, D., 1993. ‘Descartes and Experiment in the Discourse and Essays’, in Voss, S. (ed.), Essays on the Philosophy and Science of Descartes. Oxford: 288–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

García Ballester, L., 1971. ‘La utilizacion de Platon y Aristoteles en los escritos tardios de Galeno’, Episteme 5: 112–20.Google Scholar

Garnsey, P., 1970. Social Status and Legal Privilege in the Roman Empire. Oxford.Google Scholar

Garofalo, I. (ed.), 1986, 2000. Galenus: Anatomicarum administrationem libri qui supersunt novem. Earundem interpretatio Arabica Hunaino Isaaci filio ascripta (2 vols.). Naples.

Garofalo, I. 1991. Galeno: Procedimenti Anatomici (3 vols.). Milan.

Garofalo, I. 1994. ‘Note filologiche sull’ anatomia di Galeno', in Haase, and Temporini, . II.37.2: 1790–833.

Garofalo, I. and Vegetti, M. (eds.), 1978. Galeno: Opere Scelte. Turin.

Gibson, R., 2003. ‘Pliny and the Art of Inoffensive Self-praise’, Arethusa 36: 235–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gigon, O. (ed.), 1983. Aristoteles: Fragmenta. Berlin.

Gill, C., 2000. ‘The Body's Fault? Plato's Timaeus on Psychic Illness’, in Wright, M. R. (ed.), Reason and Necessity: Essays on Plato's Timaeus. London: 59–84.Google Scholar

Gill, C., 2003. ‘The School in the Roman Imperial Period’, in Inwood, B. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics. Cambridge: 33–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gill, C., 2006. The Structured Self in Hellenistic and Roman Thought. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gill, C., 2007. ‘Galen and the Stoics: Mortal Enemies or Blood Brothers?’, Phronesis 52: 88–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gleason, M., 1995. Making Men: Sophists and Self-Presentation in Ancient Rome. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Gleason, M., 1999. ‘Truth-contests and Talking Corpses’, Porter, J. I. (ed.), in Constructions of the Classical Body. Ann Arbor, MI: 287–313.Google Scholar

Gottschalk, H., 1987. ‘Aristotelian Philosophy in the Roman World from the Time of Cicero to the End of the Second Century AD’, in Haase, and Temporini, II.36.2: 1079–174.

Gowers, E., 1993. The Loaded Table: Representations of Food in Roman Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Grant, M., 2000. Galen on Food and Diet. London, New York.Google Scholar

Griffin, J., 1984. ‘Augustus and the Poets: “Caesar qui cogere potest”’, in Millar, F. and Segal, E. (eds.), Caesar Augustus: Seven Aspects. 189–219.

Griffin, M. T., 1976, 2nd edn. 1992. Seneca: A Philosopher in Politics. Oxford.Google Scholar

Grmek, M. D., 1996. Il calderone de Medea: La sperimentazione sul vivente nell'Antichità. Rome.Google Scholar

Grmek, M. D. and Gourevitch, D., 1994. ‘Aux sources de la doctrine médicale de Galien: l'enseignement de Marinus, Quintus et Numisianus’, in Haase, and Temporini, II.37.2: 1491–528.

Grodzynski, D., 1984. Le châtiment dans la cité. Collection de l'école française de Rome 79. Rome.Google Scholar

Guardasole, A. (ed.), 1997. Eraclide di Taranto: Frammenti, testo critico, introduzione e commentario. Naples.

Gunderson, E., 2003. Declamation, Paternity, and Roman Identity. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haase, W., 1982. Untersuchungen zu Nikomachos von Gerasa. Frankfurt.Google Scholar

Haase, W. and Temporini, H. (eds.), 1972–. Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt (multi-volume series). Berlin.

Hadot, P., 1995. Philosophy as a Way of Life, trans. Chase, M., edited with introduction by Davidson, A. I.. Oxford.Google Scholar

Halkin, A. S., 1944. ‘Classical and Arabic Material in Ibn ‘Aknin'sHygiene of the Soul’, Proceedings of the American Academy for Jewish Research 14: 25–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hankinson, R. J., 1987a. ‘Causes and Empiricism’, Phronesis 32.3: 329–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hankinson, R. J., 1987b. ‘Evidence, Externality and Antecedence’, Phronesis 32.1: 80–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hankinson, R. J., 1988. ‘Galen explains the Elephant’, in Matthen, M. and Linsky, B. (eds.), Philosophy and Biology (Canadian Journal of Philosophy supp. vol. XIV): 135–57.Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J., 1989. ‘Galen and the Best of all Possible Worlds’, Classical Quarterly 39: 206–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hankinson, R. J., 1991a. ‘Galen on the Foundations of Science’, in López Férez 1991b: 15–29.

Hankinson, R. J., (ed.), 1991b. Galen: On the Therapeutic Method: Books I and II, with translation and commentary. Oxford.

Hankinson, R. J., 1991c. ‘Galen's Anatomy of the Soul’, Phronesis 36.3: 197–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hankinson, R. J., 1992a. ‘A Purely Verbal Dispute? Galen on Stoic and Academic Epistemology’, in Voelke, A.-J. (ed.), Le Stoïcisme: Revue internationale de philosophie 45.3: 267–300.Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J., 1992b. ‘Galen's Philosophical Eclecticism’, in Haase, and Temporini, II.36.5: 3505–22.

Hankinson, R. J., 1993. ‘Actions and Passions: Affection, Emotion and Moral Self-Management in Galen's Philosophical Psychology’, in Brunschwig, J. and Nussbaum, M. C. (eds.), Passions and Perceptions: Studies in Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: 184–222.Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J., 1994a. ‘Galen's Anatomical Procedures: A Second-Century Debate in Medical Epistemology’, in Haase, and Temporini, II.37.2: 1834–55.

Hankinson, R. J., 1994b. ‘Galen's Theory of Causation’, in Haase, and Temporini, II.37.2: 1757–74.

Hankinson, R. J., 1994. ‘Usage and Abusage: Galen on Language’, in Everson, S. (ed.), Language, Companions to Ancient Thought vol. III. Cambridge: 166–87.Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J., 1995a. ‘Philosophy of Science’, in Barnes, J. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle. Cambridge: 109–39.Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J., 1995b. The Sceptics. London.Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J., 1997. ‘Natural Criteria and the Transparency of Judgement: Philo, Antiochus and Galen on Epistemological Justification’, in Inwood, B. and Mansfeld, J. (eds.), Assent and Argument: Studies in Cicero's Academic Books. Leiden: 161–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hankinson, R. J., (ed.), 1998. Galen: On Antecedent Causes, with translation and commentary. Cambridge.

Hankinson, R. J., 2006. ‘Body and Soul in Galen’, in King, R. A. H. (ed.), Common to Body and Soul: Philosophical Approaches to Explaining Living Behaviour in Greco-Roman Antiquity. Berlin: 231–58.Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J., 2008a. ‘Philosophy of Nature’, in Hankinson 2008b: 210–41.

Hankinson, R. J., (ed.), 2008b. The Cambridge Companion to Galen. Cambridge.CrossRef

Hankinson, R. J., (2009) ‘Medicine and the Science of the Soul’, in Wallis, F.. (ed.), Medicine and the Soul of Science. Canadian Bulletin of Medical History 26.1. Montreal.Google Scholar

Harig, G., 1974. Bestimmung der Intensität im medizinischen System Galens. Berlin.Google Scholar

Harig, G., 1983. ‘Zur Charakterisierung der wissenschaftstheoretischen Aspekte in der Aristotelischen Biologie und Medizin’, in Irmscher, J. and Müller, R. (eds.), Aristoteles als Wissenschaftstheoretiker. Berlin: 159–70.Google Scholar

Hawkins, J. N., 2003. ‘Cries and Cutting.’ Unpublished essay.

Heath, T. L., 1913. Aristarchus of Samos: The Ancient Copernicus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Heiberg, I. L. (ed.), 1927. Hippocratis Opera vol. 1. CMG 1.1. Leipzig/Berlin.

Helmreich, G. (ed.), 1893. Galeni Scripta Minora III. Leipzig.

Helmreich, G. (ed.), 1904. Galenus: de Temperamentis Libri III. Leipzig.

Helmreich, G. (ed.), 1907–9. Galeni de Usu Partium. (2 vols.). Leipzig.

Henderson, J., 2002. Pliny's Statue: The Letters, Self-Portraiture and Classical Art. Exeter.Google Scholar

Herbst, W., 1911. Galeni de Atticissantium Studiis Testimonia, (Diss. Marburg). Leipzig.Google Scholar

Herzog, R., 1934. ‘Ein Asklepios-Hymnus des Aristeides von Smyrna’, Sitzungsberichte der preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, philosophische-historische Klasse: 735–69.Google Scholar

Himmelmann, N., 1971. Archäologisches zum Problem der griechischen Sklaverei, Abhandlungen der Akademie Wissenschaften Mainz XIII.

Hintikka, K. J. J. and Remes, U. (eds.), 1974. The Method of Analysis. Dordrecht.CrossRef

Hsu, E., 2002. The Telling Touch (Habilitationschrift, Sinology, University of Heidelberg).Google Scholar

Ierodiakonou, K., 1999. ‘Galen's Criticism of the Aristotelian Theory of Colour Vision’, in Natali, C. and Maso, S. (eds.), Antiaristotelismo. Amsterdam: 123–41.Google Scholar

Ihm, S., 2002. Clavis Commentariorum der antiken medizinischen Texte. Clavis Commentariorum Antiquitatis et Medii Aevi vol. I. Leiden.Google Scholar

Ilberg, J., 1892. ‘Über die Schriftstellerei des Klaudios Galenos’, Rheinisches Museum 47: 489–514.Google Scholar

Ilberg, J., 1895. ‘De Hippocratis Epidemiorum Libri Tertii Characteribus’, Philologus 54 (N.F. 8): 396–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ilberg, J., 1905. ‘Aus Galens Praxis: Ein Kulturbild aus der römischen Kaiserzeit’, Neue Jahrbuch für die klassische Altertum, Geschichte und deutsche Literatur und für Pädagogik 15: 276–312.Google Scholar

Ioppolo, A. M., 1993. ‘The Academic Position of Favorinus of Arelate’, Phronesis 38: 183–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ioppolo, A. M., 2002. ‘Gli Accademici “νεώτεροι” nel secondo secolo d.C.’, Methexis 15: 45–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Irmer, D., 2007. ‘Das Hippokratesglossar Erotians und die Identifizierung der erklärten Stellen im Corpus Hippocraticum’, Galenos 1: 61–72.Google Scholar

Iskandar, A. Z. (ed.), 1988. Galeni: De optimo medico cognoscendo. CMG Suppl. Or. IV. Berlin.

Jacob, C., 2000. ‘Athenaeus the Librarian’, in Braund and Wilkins: 87–102.

Jaeger, W., 1914. Nemesios von Emesa: Quellenforschungen zum Neuplatonismus und seinen Anfängen bei Poseidonios. Berlin.Google Scholar

Janson, T., 1964. Latin Prose Prefaces: Studies in Literary Conventions. Stockholm.Google Scholar

Johansen, T. K., 2004. Plato's Natural Philosophy: A Study of the Timaeus-Critias. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joly, R. (ed.), 1977. Corpus Hippocraticum: Actes du Colloque hippocratique de Mons. Mons.

Jones, C. P., 1987. ‘Stigma: Tattooing and Branding in Greco-Roman Antiquity’ Journal of Roman Studies 77: 139–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, W. H. S., 1923–95. Hippocrates, (edited with translation (Loeb Classical Library), 8 vols.), Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Jouanna, J., 1991. ‘Remarques sur la tradition arabe du commentaire de Galien aux traités hippocratiques des Airs, Eaux, Lieux et du Serment’, in López Férez 1991: 235–51.

Jouanna, J., 1997. ‘Remarques sur les titres dans la collection hippocratique’, in Fredouille, J.-C., Goulet-Cazé, M.-O., Hoffmann, P. and Petitmengin, P. (eds.), Titres et articulations du texte dans les oeuvres antiques. Actes du colloque international de Chantilly, 13–15 Décembre 1994. Paris: 55–73.Google Scholar

Jouanna, J., 2000. ‘La lecture du traité hippocratique de la Nature de l'homme par Galien’, in Goulet-Cazé, M.-O. (ed.), Le commentaire entre tradition et innovation. Paris: 273–92.Google Scholar

Jouanna, J., (ed.), 2002. Hippocratis De natura hominis. CMG I.1.3. (2nd edn.). Berlin.

Jouanna, J., 2003. ‘La notion de la nature chez Galien’, in Barnes and Jouanna: 229–68.

Kany-Turpin, J. (ed.), 2005. Signe et Prédiction dans l'Antiquité. St. Etienne.

Karamanolis, G., 2004. ‘Porphyry: The first Platonist commentator on Aristotle’, in Adamson, P., Baltussen, H. and Stone, M. W. F. (eds.), Philosophy, Science and Exegesis in Greek, Arabic and Latin Commentaries vol. I. London: 97–120.Google Scholar

Karamanolis, G., 2006. Plato and Aristotle in Agreement? Platonists on Aristotle from Antiochus to Porphyry. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keil, J., 1905. ‘Ärzteinschriften aus Ephesos’, Jahreshefte der Österreichischen Archäologischen Institutes in Wien 8: 128–38.Google Scholar

Kennedy, G., 1969. Quintilian. New York.Google Scholar

Kind, F. E., 1920. ‘Review of Wenkebach (1920)’, Berliner philologische Wochenschrift, Jg. 40, 1920.51: 1201–9.Google Scholar

Kirk, G. S., Raven, J. E. and Schofield, M., 1983. The Presocratic Philosophers, 2nd edn. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Knibbe, D., 1981–2. ‘Neue Inschriften aus Ephesos’, Jahreshefte der Österreichischen Archäologischen Institutes in Wien (Hauptblatt) 53: 87–150.Google Scholar

Koch, K., Helmreich, G., Kalbfleisch, K. and Hartlich, O. (eds.), 1923. Galeni De Sanitate Tuenda, De Alimentorum Facultatibus, De Bonis Malisque Sucis, De Victu Attenuante, De Ptisana. CMG V.4.2. Berlin.

Kollesch, J., 1964. De Instrumento Odoratus, edited with translation and commentary. CMG Supplement V. Berlin.Google Scholar

Kollesch, J. 1981a. ‘Galen und die zweite Sophistik’, in Nutton 1981: 1–11.

Kollesch, J. 1981b. ‘Galen als Vertreter der Zweiten Sophistik’, Commentationes de Historia Artis Medicinae 27: 47–54.Google Scholar

Kollesch, J. 1987. ‘Galens Auseinandersetzung mit der aristotelischen Samenlehre’, in Wiesner, J. (ed.), Aristoteles: Werk und Wirkung, vol. II. Berlin: 17–26.Google Scholar

Kollesch, J. 1988. ‘Anschauungen von den Arkhai in der Ars Medica und die Seelenlehre Galens’, in Manuli and Vegetti 1988: 215–29.

Kollesch, J. 1997. ‘Die anatomischen Untersuchungen des Aristoteles und ihr Stellenwert als Forschungsmethode in der aristotelischen Biologie’, in Kullman and Föllinger: 367–74.

Kollesch, J. and Nickel, D. (eds.), 1993. Galen und das hellenistische Erbe: Verhandlungen des IV. Internationalen Galen-Symposiums, Sudhoffs Archiv, Beiheft XXXII. Stuttgart.

Kollesch, J. and Nickel, D. 1994. ‘Bibliographia Galeniana: Die Beiträge des 20. Jahrhunderts zur Galen-forschung’, in Haase and Temporini II.37.2: 1351–1420.

König, A., 2007. ‘Knowledge and Power in Frontinus’ On Aqueducts', in König and Whitmarsh (2007b): 177–205.Google Scholar

König, J., 2005. Athletics and Literature in the Roman Empire. Cambridge.Google Scholar

König, J., 2007. ‘Fragmentation and Coherence in Plutarch's Sympotic Questions’, in König and Whitmarsh (2007b): 43–68.

König, J. and Whitmarsh, T., 2007a. ‘Ordering Knowledge’, in König and Whitmarsh (2007b): 3–39.

König, J. and Whitmarsh, T. (eds.), 2007b. Ordering Knowledge in the Roman Empire. Cambridge.CrossRef

Kotzia-Panteli, P., 2000. ‘ΕΝΝΟΗΜΑΤΙΚΟΣ und ΟΥΣΙΩΔΗΣ ΛΟΓΟΣ als exegetisches Begriffspaar’, Philologus 144: 45–61.Google Scholar

Kovačić, F., 2001. Der Begriff der Physis bei Galen vor dem Hintergrund seiner Vorgänger. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Kraus, P. and Walzer, R. (eds.), 1951. Galeni Compendium Timaei Platonis. London.

Kudlien, F., 1971. ‘Galens Urteil über die Thukydideische Pestbeschreibung’, Episteme 5: 132–3.Google Scholar

Kudlien, F., 1989. ‘Hippokrates-Rezeption im Hellenismus’, in Baader, G. and Winau, R. (eds.), Die hippokratischen Epidemien: Theorie-Praxis-Tradition: Verhandlungen des Ve Colloque international hippocratique, Berlin. Sudhoffs Archiv, Beiheft 27: 355–76.Google Scholar

Kudlien, F., 1991. ‘Endeixis as scientific term: (A) Galen's use of the word (in medicine and logic’, in Kudlien and Durling: 103–11.

Kudlien, F. and Durling, R. J. (eds.), 1991. Galen's Method of Healing. Leiden.PubMed

Kühn, C.G. (ed.), 1821–33, Galeni Opera Omnia (20 vols.) Leipzig, repr. 1965, Hildesheim.

Kühn, J.-H. and Fleischer, U., 1986. Index Hippocraticus, revised K. Alpers, A. Anastassiou, D. Irmer, V. Schmidt. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Kullman, W. and Föllinger, S. (eds.), 1997. Aristotelische Biologie. Stuttgart.

Lamoureux, J. and Aujoulat, N. (eds.), 2004. Synesius of Cyrene: Dio or the Way of Life True to its Model. Paris.

Langholf, V., 1977. Syntaktische Untersuchungen zu Hippokrates-Texten, Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur Mainz, Abhandlungen der geistes- und sozialwissenschaftliche Klasse, Einzelveröffentlichung.

Latte, K., 1915. ‘Zur Zeitbestimmung des Antiatticista’, Hermes 50: 373–94. Reprinted in Latte (1968): 612–30.Google Scholar

Latte, K., 1925. ‘Glossographika’, Philologus 80: 136–74. Reprinted in Latte (1968): 631–66.Google Scholar

Latte, K., 1968. Kleine Schriften, Gigon, O., Buchwald, W. and Kunkel, W. (eds.), Munich.Google Scholar

Lesky, E. A., 1951. Die Zeugungs- und Vererbungslehren der Antike und ihr Nachleben. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Levin, F. R., 1967. Nicomachus of Gerasa, Manual of Harmonics (Diss. Columbia University) New York, NY.Google Scholar

Lieberman, S., 1944–5. ‘Roman Legal Institutions in early Rabbinics and in the Acta Martyrum’, Jewish Quarterly Review 35: 1–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lim, R., 1995. Public Disputation, Power, and Social Order in Late Antiquity. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar

Lipsius, R. A. (ed.), 1891. Acta apostolorum apocrypha, vol. I. Leipzig.

Littré, É. (ed.), 1839–61. Oeuvres complètes d'Hippocrate (10 vols.). Paris.

Lloyd, G. E. R., 1979. Magic, Reason and Experience. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R., 1987. The Revolutions of Wisdom. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R., 1988. ‘Scholarship, Authority and Argument in Galen's Quod animi mores’, in Manuli and Vegetti 1988: 11–42.

Lloyd, G. E. R., 1990. Demystifying Mentalities. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R., 1991a. ‘Galen on Hellenistics and Hippocrateans: Contemporary Battles and Past Authorities’, in Lloyd 1991b: 398–416. Reprinted in Kollesch and Nickel 1993: 125–43.

Lloyd, G. E. R., 1991b. Methods and Problems in Greek Science. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R., 1996. ‘Theories and Practices of Demonstration in Galen’, in Frede, M. and Striker, G. (eds.), Rationality in Greek Thought. Oxford: 255–78.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R., 2005. ‘Mathematics as a Model of Method in Galen’, in Sharples, R. W. (ed.), Philosophy and the Sciences in Antiquity. Aldershot: 110–30.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R., 2008. ‘Galen and His Contemporaries’, in Hankinson 2005: 34–48.

Long, A. A., 1998. ‘Ptolemy On the Criterion: An Epistemology for the Practising Scientist’, in Dillon and Long: 176–207.

Long, L., 2001. Openness, Secrecy, Authorship: Technical Arts and the Culture of Knowledge from Antiquity to the Renaissance. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar

Lonie, I. M., 1964. ‘Erasistratus, the Erasistrateans and Aristotle’, Bulletin of the History of Medicine 38: 426–43.Google ScholarPubMed

López Férez, J. A., 1991a. ‘Acerca del comentario di Galeno a los Aforismos hippocráticos’, in López Férez 1991b: 161–203.

López Férez, J. A., ed., 1991b. Galeno: obra, pensamiento e influencía: Coloquio internacional, Madrid, 1988. Madrid.

López Férez, J. A., 2005. ‘El helenismo de Galieno’, in Boudon, V., Garzya, A., Jouanna, J., Roselli, A. (eds.) Ecdotica e trasmissione dei testi medici greci. Naples: 137–65.Google Scholar

Lyons, M. (ed.), 1963. Galeni in Hippocratis De officina medici commentariorum versionem Arabicam, quoad exstat, ex codice Scorialensi et Excerpta, quae Ali ibn Ridwan ex eis sumpsit, ex codice Cantabrigensi edidit et in linguam Anglicam vertit, CMG, Supplementum Orientale, vol. I. Berlin.

Magnaldi, G. (ed.), 1999. Galeni de proprium animi cuiuslibet affectuum dignotione et curatione. Rome.

Manetti, D., 1985. ‘Tematica filosofica e scientifica nel Papiro Fiorentino 115: Un probabile frammento di Galeno In Hippocratis de alimento’, in Cavini, W., Macciò, M. C. Donini, Funghi, M. S., Manetti, D. (eds.), Studi su papiri greci di logica e medicina, Accademia Toscana di Scienze e Lettere ‘La Colombaria’, Studi 74. Florence, 173–213.Google Scholar

Manetti, D., 1995. ‘Commentarium in Hippocratis “De alimento”’, Corpus dei Papiri Filosofici greci e latini III. Florence: 39–51.Google Scholar

Manetti, D., 1999. ‘“Aristotle” and the Role of Doxography in the Anonymus Londiniensis (PBRLibr Inv. 137)’, in van der Eijk 1999b: 95–141.

Manetti, D., 2000a. ‘Galeno tra autodefinizione e ricezione’, in Manetti, D. (ed.), Studi su Galeno, Studi e Testi XVII. Florence: 8–12.Google Scholar

Manetti, D., (ed.), 2000b. Studi su Galeno: Scienza, filosofia, retorica e filologia. Florence.

Manetti, D., 2002. ‘La Grecia e il Greco: la fuga dei filologi (Herodic. SH 494)’, Eikasmos 13: 183–97.Google Scholar

Manetti, D., 2003. ‘Galeno, la lingua di Ippocrate e il tempo’, in Barnes and Jouanna: 171–228.

Manetti, D. and Roselli, A., 1994. ‘Galeno commentatore di Ippocrate’, in Haase, and Temporini, II.37.2: 1529–635, 2071–80.

Manetti, D. and Roselli, A., 1996. ‘Note per una nuova edizione dei commenti di Galeno ai trattati chirurgici di Ippocrate’, in Vegetti, M. and Gastaldi, S. (eds.), Studi di storia della medicina antica e medievale: in memoriam di Paola Manuli. Florence: 77–87.Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J., 1992. Heresiography in Context: Hippolytus' Elenchos as a Source for Greek Philosophy. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mansfeld, J., 1994. Prolegomena: Questions to be Settled Before the Study of an Author, or a Text, Philosophia Antiqua LXI. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manuli, P., 1983. ‘Lo stile del commento: Galeno e la tradizione ippocratica’, in Lasserre, F. and Mudry, P. (eds.), Formes de pensée dans la Collection hippocratique. Actes du IVe Colloque international hippocratique. Lausanne: 471–82.Google Scholar

Manuli, P., 1993. ‘Galen and Stoicism’, in Kollesch and Nickel 1993: 53–61.

Manuli, P. and Vegetti, M., 1977. Cuore, sangue e cervello: biologica e antropologica nel pensiero antico. Milan.Google Scholar

Manuli, P. and Vegetti, M., (eds.), 1988. Le opere psicologiche di Galeno. Naples.

Maraval, P., 1990. La passion inédite de S. Athénogène de Pedachthoé en Cappadoce (BHG 197b). Subsidia Hagiographica LXXV. Brussels.Google Scholar

Marganne, M.–H., 1997. ‘Les médicaments estampillés dans le Corpus galénique’, in Debru 1997: 153–74.

Marganne, M.–H., 2004. Le Livre médical dans le Monde gréco-romain. Liège.Google Scholar

Marquardt, J. (ed.), 1884. Galeni Pergameni Scripta Minora vol. I. Leipzig.

Marquardt, J., Muller, I., Helmreich, G. (eds.), 1967. Claudii Galeni Pergameni Scripta Minora (3 vols.). Leipzig: Teubner, 1884–93, repr. Amsterdam 1967.

Mattern, S. P., 2008. Galen and the Rhetoric of Healing. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Mattock, J. N., 1972. ‘A Translation of the Arabic Epitome of Galen's Book Peri ēthōn’, in Stern, S. M., Hourani, A. and Brown, V. (eds.), Islamic Philosophy and the Classical Tradition: Essays Presented by his Friends and Pupils to Richard Walzer on his Seventieth Birthday. Oxford: 235–60.Google Scholar

May, M. T., 1968. Galen: On the Usefulness of the Parts of the Body, translated with introduction and notes (2 vols.). Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

McCann, A. M., 1978. Roman Sarcophagi in the Metropolitan Museum of New York. New York.Google Scholar

McEwen, I., 2003. Vitruvius: Writing the Body of Architecture. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Meissner, B., 1999. Die technologische Fachliterature der Antike: Struktur, Überlieferung und Wirkung in der Antike (ca. 400 v. Chr. – ca 500 n. Chr.). Berlin.Google Scholar

Menn, S., 2003. Review of Opsomer 1998, Bryn Mawr Classical Review. (http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/bmcr/2003/2003-08-19.html).

Mewaldt, J., 1909. ‘Galen über echte und unechte Hippocratica’, Hermes 44: 111–34.Google Scholar

Mewaldt, J., Helmreich, G. and Westenberger, J. (eds.), 1914. Galeni: In Hippocratis de natura hominis; In Hippocratis de victu acutorum; De diaeta Hippocratis in morbis acutis. CMG V. 9.1. Berlin.

Meyerhof, M., 1929. ‘Autobiographische Buchstücke Galens aus arabischen Quellen’, Sudhoffs Archiv für Geschichte der Medizin 22: 72–86.Google Scholar

Meyerhof, M. and Schacht, J. (eds.), 1931. Galen iiber die Medizinischen Namen. Berlin.

Moatti, C., 1991. ‘La crise de la tradition à la fin de la république romaine à travers la literature juridique et la science des antiquaires’, in Pani, M. (ed.), Continuità e trasformazione fra repubblica e principato. Bari: 30–45.Google Scholar

Moatti, C., 1997. La raison de Rome. Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montanari, F., 1988. I frammenti dei grammatici Agathokles, Hellanikos, Ptolemaios Epithetes. Sammlung der Griechischen und Lateinischen Grammatiker VII. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montanari, F., (ed.), 1994. La philologie grecque à l'époque hellénistique et romaine. Fondation Hardt Entretiens sur l'Antiquité classique, vol. XL. Vandoeuvres-Geneva.

Moraux, P., 1976. ‘Galien et Aristote’, in Bossier, F., Maertens, G., Vanhamel, W., Verhelst, D., Welkenhuysen, A. and Laga, C. (eds.), Images of Man in Ancient and Medieval Thought. Leuven: 127–46.Google Scholar

Moraux, P., 1978. ‘Le De anima dans la tradition grecque’, in Lloyd, G. E. R. and Owen, G. E. L. (eds.), Aristotle on Mind and the Senses. Cambridge: 281–324.Google Scholar

Moraux, P., 1981. ‘Galien comme philosophe: la philosophie de la nature’, in Nutton 1981: 87–116.

Moraux, P., 1984. Der Aristotelismus bei den Griechen von Andronikos bis Alexander von Aphrodisias, Band II: Der Aristotelismus im 1. und 2. Jh. n. Chr. Berlin.Google Scholar

Moraux, P., 1985a. ‘Galen and Aristotle's De partibus animalium’, in Gotthelf, A. (ed.), Aristotle on Nature and Living Things. Bristol: 327–44.Google Scholar

Moraux, P., 1985b. Galien de Pergame: Souvenirs d'un médecin. Paris.Google Scholar

Moraux, P., 1987. ‘Homère chez Galien’, in Servais, J., Hackens, T. and Servais-Soyez, B. (eds.), Stemmata: Mélanges de Philologie, d'Histoire et d'Archéologie grecques offerts à J. Labarbe, L'Antiquité Classique, supplement. Liège: 25–37.Google Scholar

Morgan, T., 1998. Literate Education in the Hellenistic and Roman Worlds. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Morrison, D., 1997. ‘Philoponus and Simplicius on Tekmeriodic Proof’, in Liscia, D. A. Di, Kessler, E. and Methuen, C. (eds.), Method and Order in Renaissance Philosophy of Nature: The Aristotle Commentary Tradition. Aldershot: 1–22.Google Scholar

Most, G., 1992. ‘Disiecti membra poetae: The Rhetoric of Dismemberment in Neronian Poetry’, in Hexter, R. and Selden, D. (eds.), Innovations of Antiquity. New York: 391–419.Google Scholar

Most, G., (ed.), 1999. Commentaries–Kommentare, Aporemata IV. Göttingen.

Müller, I. von. (ed.), 1891. Galeni Pergameni Scripta Minora vol. 2. Leipzig.

Müller, I. von. 1895/7. ‘Über Galens Werk vom wissenschaftlichen Beweis’, Abhandlungen der Akademie der Wissenschaften München, 20: 403–78.

Murphy, T., 2004. Pliny the Elder's Natural History: The Empire in the Encyclopedia. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mynors, R. (ed.), 1990. Virgil: Georgics. Oxford.

Nachmanson, E., 1917. Erotianstudien. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Nachmanson, E., (ed.), 1918. Erotiani vocum Hippocraticarum collectio cum fragmentis. Uppsala.

Netz, R., 1999. The Shaping of Deduction in Greek Mathematics: A Study in Cognitive Development. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nickel, D., 1993. ‘Stoa und Stoiker in Galens Schrift De foetuum formatione’, in Kollesch and Nickel 1993: 79–86.

Nickel, D., (ed.), 2001. Galeni de Foetuum Formatione. CMG V.3.3. Berlin.CrossRef

Nicolet, C. (ed.), 1995. Les littératures techniques dans l'antiquité romaine: statut, public et destination, tradition. Vandoeuvres-Geneva.

Noja, S., 1984. ‘Un nuovo anello nella trasmissione della cultura classica attraverso l'Islam: il manoscritto arabo del commentario di Galeno ai libri περὶ τόπων καὶ ἀέρων καὶ ὑδάτων di Ippocrate’, Schede Medievali6–7: 42–51.Google Scholar

Noreña, C., 2001. ‘The Communication of the Emperor's Virtues’, Journal of Roman Studies 91: 146–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nutton, V., 1972. ‘Galen and Medical Autobiography’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, n.s. 18: 50–62.Google Scholar

Nutton, V., 1973. ‘The Chronology of Galen's Early Career’, Classical Quarterly 23: 158–71. Reprinted in From Democedes to Harvey: Studies in the History of Medicine. London 1988: II, pp. 158–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nutton, V., (ed.), 1979. Galen, On Prognosis. CMG V.8.1. Berlin.

Nutton, V., (ed.), 1981. Galen: Problems and Prospects. London.

Nutton, V., 1984. ‘Galen in the Eyes of his Contemporaries’, Bulletin of the History of Medicine 58: 315–24.Google ScholarPubMed

Nutton, V., 1990. ‘The Patient's Choice: A New Treatise by Galen’, Classical Quarterly 40: 235–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nutton, V., 1991. ‘Style and Context in the “Method of Healing”’, in Kudlien and Durling: 1–25.

Nutton, V., 1993. ‘Galen and Egypt’, in Kollesch and Nickel 1993: 11–32.

Nutton, V., 1995. ‘The Medical Meeting Place’, Clio Medica 28: 3–25.Google Scholar

Nutton, V., (ed.), 1999. Galen: On My Own Opinions. CMG V 3.2. Berlin.

Nutton, V., (ed.), 2002. The Unknown Galen. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies supplement 77. London.

Nutton, V., 2004. Ancient Medicine. London.Google Scholar

Oliver, J. and Palmer, R., 1955. ‘Minutes of an Act of the Roman Senate’, Hesperia 24: 320–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Opsomer, J., 1998. In Search of the Truth: Academic Tendencies in Middle Platonism. Brussels.Google Scholar

Opsomer, J., 2005a. ‘Demiurges in Early Imperial Platonism’, in Hirsch-Luipold, R. (ed.), Gott und die Götter bei Plutarch. Berlin: 51–99.Google Scholar

Opsomer, J., 2005b. ‘Plutarch's Platonism Revisited’, in Bonazzi and Celluprica: 161–200.

Pearcy, L. T., 1993. ‘Medicine and Rhetoric in the Period of the Second Sophistic’, in Haase, and Temporini, II.37.1. Berlin: 445–56.

Pellegrin, P., 2005. ‘Scepticisme et sémiologie médicale’, in Kany-Turpin: 65–82.

Pfaff, F., 1931. ‘Die nur arabisch erhaltenen Teile der Epidemien-Kommentare des Galen und die Überlieferung des Corpus Hippocraticum’, Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Berlin: 558–81.Google Scholar

Pfaff, F., 1932. ‘Rufus aus Samaria, Hippokrateskommentator und Quelle Galens’, Hermes 67: 356–9.Google Scholar

Pfeiffer, R., 1968. History of Classical Scholarship: From the Beginning to the End of the Hellenistic Age. Oxford.Google Scholar

Pigeaud, J., 1981. La Maladie de l'âme: Étude sur la relation de l'âme et du corps dans la tradition médico-philosophique antique. Paris.Google Scholar

Pigeaud, A. and Pigeaud, J. (eds.), 2002. Les textes medicaux latins comme litérature. Nantes.

Pormann, P. E., 2005. ‘The Physician and the Other: Images of the Charlatan in Medieval Islam’, Bulletin of the History of Medicine 19: 189–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Potter, D., 1996. ‘Performance, Power and Justice in the High Empire’, in Slater, W. J. (ed.), Roman Theater and Society: E. Togo Salmon Papers I. Ann Arbor, MI: 129–59.Google Scholar

Potter, D., 1999. ‘Entertainers in the Roman Empire’, in Potter, D. and Mattingly, D. (eds.), Life, Death, and Entertainment in the Roman Empire. Ann Arbor, MI: 256–325.Google Scholar

Powell, O., 2003. Galen: On the Property of Foodstuffs. Introduction, translation and commentary. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Preus, A. M., 1977. ‘Galen's Criticism of Aristotle's Conception Theory’, Journal of the History of Biology 10: 65–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rashed, M., 1995. ‘Alexandre d'Aphrodise et la “Magna Quaestio”: role et indépendance des scholies dans la tradition byzantine du corpus aristotélicien’, Les Études classiques 63: 295–351.Google Scholar

Reardon, B. P., 1971. Courants littéraires grecs des IIe et IIIe siècles après J-C. Paris.Google Scholar

Reinhardt, T., 2003. Marcus Tullius Cicero: Topica, with translation and commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar

Robinson, R., 1969. ‘Analysis in Greek Geometry’, in Robinson, R.Essays in Greek Philosophy. Oxford: 1–16.Google Scholar

Rocca, J., 2003. Galen on the Brain. Leiden.Google Scholar

Rocca, J., 2008. ‘Anatomy’, in Hankinson 2008b: 242–62.

Rose, V. (ed.), 1863. Aristoteles Pseudepigraphus. Leipzig.

Roselli, A., 1988. ‘Citazioni ippocratiche in Demetrio Lacone (PHerc. 1012)’, Bolletino del Centro Internazionale per lo Studio dei Papyri Ercolanesi (Cronache Ercolanesi) 18: 53–7.Google Scholar

Roselli, A., 1991. ‘I commenti di Galeno ai trattati chirurgici (Fratture/Articolazioni ed Officina del medico): problemi di tradizione ippocratica e galenica’, Studi Classica et Orientali 41, 467–75.Google Scholar

Roselli, A., 1996. ‘Note sulla tradizione dei commenti di Galeno ai trattati chirurgici di Ippocrate: L'apporto degli scolî ad Oribasio’, Storia e ecdotica dei testi medici greci: Atti del II Convegno Internazionale, Parigi 1994. Naples: 375–88.Google Scholar

Roselli, A., 2000. ‘Il commento di Galeno a Sulle Fratture’, in Manetti 2000b: 93–110.

Rosenthal, F., 1950. ‘Al-Asturlabi and As-Samaw'al on Scientific Progress’, Osiris 9: 555–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenthal, F., 1956. ‘An Ancient Commentary on the Hippocratic Oath’, Bulletin of the History of Medicine 30: 52–87.Google ScholarPubMed

Rosenthal, F., 1961. ‘Al-Mubashshir ibn Fatik. Prolegomena to an Abortive Edition’, Oriens13–14: 132–58.Google Scholar

Rosenthal, F., 1975. The Classical Heritage in Islam. London.Google Scholar

Ross, R. C., 1971. ‘ἄμβων/ἄμβη and Latin Umbo’, Glotta 49: 244–59.Google Scholar

Runia, D., 1989. ‘Festugière revisited: Aristotle in the Greek Patres’, Vigiliae Christianae 43: 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Runia, D. 1999. ‘What is Doxography’, in van der Eijk 1999b: 33–55.

Santini, C. (ed.), 2002. Letterature scientifica e tecnica di Grecia e Roma. Rome.

Santini, C. and Scivoletto, N. (eds.), 1990–2. Prefazioni, prologhi, proemi di opere tecnico-scientifiche latine (2 vols.). Rome.

Sartre, M., 1991. L'Orient romain: Provinces et societés provinciales en Méditerranée orientale d'Auguste aux Sévères (31 avant J.-C.-235 après J.-C.). Paris.Google Scholar

Scarborough, J., 1971. ‘Galen and the Gladiators’, Episteme 5: 98–111.Google Scholar

Scarborough, J., 1981. ‘The Galenic Question’, Sudhoffs Archiv 65: 1–31.Google ScholarPubMed

Scarborough, J., 2006. ‘Mandrake in Ancient Surgery’, Paper delivered at the Society for Ancient Medicine meeting at the annual meeting of the American Philological Meeting in Montréal, Québec 7 January 2006.

Schied, J., 1995. ‘Graeco Ritu: A Typically Roman Way of Honoring the Gods’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 97: 15–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schlange-Schöningen, H., 2003 Die römische Gesellschaft bei Galen: Biographie und Sozialgeschichte. Untersuchungen Zur antiken Literatur und Geschichte LXV. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmitz, T., 1997. Bildung und Macht: zur sozialen und politische Funktion der zweiten Sophistik in der griechischen Welt der Kaiserzeit. Zetemata XCVII Munich.Google Scholar

Schneemelcher, W., 1965. Edgar Hennecke New Testament Apocrypha II. Philadelphia.Google Scholar

Schrenk, L. P., 1993. ‘The Middle Platonic Reception of Aristotelian Science’, Rheinisches Museum 136: 342–59.Google Scholar

Schrenk, L. P., 1994. ‘Proof and Discovery in Aristotle and the Later Greek Tradition: A Prolegomenon to a Study on Analysis and Synthesis’, in Schrenk, L. P. (ed.), Aristotle in Late Antiquity. Washington DC: 92–108.Google Scholar

Sharples, R. W., 1987. ‘Alexander of Aphrodisias: Scholasticism and Innovation’, in Haase, and Temporini, II.36.2, Berlin: 1176–243.

Sharples, R. W., (ed.), 2001. Whose Aristotle? Whose Aristotelianism?Aldershot.

Sharples, R. W., 2002. ‘Aristotelian Theology after Aristotle’, in Frede, D. and Laks, A. (eds.), Traditions of Theology: Studies in Hellenistic Theology, Its Background and Aftermath. Leiden: 1–40.Google Scholar

Sideras, A., 1994. ‘Rufus von Ephesos und sein Werk im Rahmen der antiken Medizin’, in Haase, and Temporini, II.37.2: 1077–253, 2036–62.

Siegel, R. E., 1968. Galen's System of Physiology and Medicine. Basel.Google Scholar

Silk, M. S., 1983. ‘LSJ and the Problem of Poetic Archaisms: from Meanings to Iconyms’, Classical Quarterly n.s. 33: 303–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simon, M., 1906. Sieben Bücher Anatomie des Galen. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Singer, C. 1959 trans. Galen on Anatomical Procedures. Oxford.

Singer, P. N., 1991. ‘Aspects of Galen's Platonism’, in López Férez 1991b: 41–56.

Singer, P. N., 1997. Galen: Selected Works, translated with introduction and notes. Oxford.Google Scholar

Skoda, F., 2001. ‘Galien lexicologue’, in Woronoff, M., Follet, S. and Jouanna, J. (eds.), Dieux héros et médecins grecs (Hommage à F. Robert). Besançon: 177–95.Google Scholar

Slater, W. J. (ed.), 1986. Aristophanis Byzantii fragmenta. Sammlung griechischer and lateinischer Grammatiker 6. Berlin.

Smith, W. D., 1979. The Hippocratic Tradition. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Sorabji, R. (ed.), 1997. Aristotle and After, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, Supplement LXVIII. London.

Sorabji, R. 2005. The Philosophy of the Commentators (200–600 AD): A Sourcebook, vol. I. Ithaca, NY.

Staden, H., 1989. Herophilus. The Art of Medicine in Early Alexandria. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Staden, H., 1992a. ‘Lexicography in the Early Third Century B.C.: Bacchius of Tanagra, Erotian, and Hippocrates’, in Férez, J. A. López (ed.), Tratados Hipocràticos. Actas del VIIe Colloque International Hippocratique. Madrid: 549–69.Google Scholar

Staden, H., 1992b. ‘The Discovery of the Body: Human Dissection and its Cultural Contexts in Ancient Greece’, Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine 65: 223–41.Google Scholar

Staden, H., 1994. ‘Anatomy as Rhetoric: Galen on Dissection and Persuasion’, Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 50: 48–67.Google Scholar

Staden, H., 1995. ‘Science as Text, Science as History. Galen on Metaphor’, in Eijk, P. J., Horstmanshoff, H. F. J., and Schrijvers, P. H. (eds.), Ancient Medicine in its Socio-cultural Contexts (2 vols.). Amsterdam: vol. 2, 499–518.Google Scholar

Staden, H., 1997a. ‘Character and Competence: Personal and Professional Conduct in Greek Medicine’, in Flashar, H. and Jouanna, J. (eds.), Médecine et morale dans l'Antiquité, Fondation Hardt Entretiens sur l'Antiquité Classique, vol. XLIII. Vandoeuvres-Geneva: 157–210.Google Scholar

Staden, H., 1997b. ‘Galen and the “Second Sophistic”’, in Sorabji 1997: 33–54.

Staden, H., 1997c. ‘Teleology and Mechanism: Aristotelian Biology and Early Hellenistic Medicine’, in Kullmann and Föllinger: 183–208.

Staden, H., 1998. ‘Gattung und Gedächtnis: Galen über Wahrheit und Lehrdichtung’, in Kullmann, W., Althoff, J., Asper, M. (eds.), Gattungen wissenschaftlicher Literatur in der Antike (ScriptOralia XCV). Tübingen: 65–94.Google Scholar

Staden, H., 2002a. ‘“A Woman does not become Ambidextrous”: Galen and the Culture of Scientific Commentary’, in Gibson, R. and Kraus, C. (eds.), The Classical Commentary: Histories, Practices, Theory. Leiden: 109–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Staden, H., 2002b. ‘Division, Dissection, and Specialization: Galen's On the Parts of the Medical Techne’, in Nutton 2002: 19–45.

Staden, H., 2004. ‘Galen's Alexandria’, in Harris, W. V. and Ruffini, G. (eds.), Ancient Alexandria between Egypt and Greece, Columbia Studies in the Classical Tradition XXVI. Leiden: 179–215.Google Scholar

Staden, H., 2006. ‘Interpreting “Hippokrates” in the 3rd and 2nd centuries BC’, in Müller, C. W., Brockmann, C. and Brunschön, C. W. (eds.), Ärzte und ihre Interpreten: Medizinische Fachtexte der Antike als Forschungsgegenstand der Klassischen Philologie. Fachkonferenz zu Ehren von Diethard Nickel. Munich and Leipzig: 15–47.Google Scholar

Stafford, E., 2005. ‘“Without You No one is Happy”: The Cult of Health in Ancient Greece’, in King, H. (ed.), Health in Antiquity. London: 136–59.Google Scholar

Steckerl, F., 1958. The Fragments of Praxagoras of Cos and his School. Leiden.Google Scholar

Steinby, E. M. (ed.), 1993–9. Lexicon Topographicum Urbis Romae. Leiden.

Stephan, H., 1889. De Herodiani technici dialectologia, (Diss. Argent.). Argentorati.Google Scholar

Strocka, V. M., 1981. ‘Die römischen Bibliotheken’, Gymnasium 88: 298–329.Google Scholar

Strohmaier, G., 1970. Galen Über die Verschiedenheit der homoiomeren Körperteile. CMG Suppl. Or III. Berlin.Google Scholar

Strohmaier, G., 1976. ‘Übersehenes zur Biographie Lukians’, Philologus 120: 117–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strohmaier, G., 1993. ‘Hellenistiche Wissenschaft im neugefundenen Galenkommentar zur hippokratischen Schrift “Über die Umwelt”’, in Kollesch and Nickel 1993: 157–64.

Strohmaier, G., 1998. ‘Bekannte und unbekannte Zitate in den Zweifeln an Galen des Rhazes’, in Fischer, K. D., Nickel, D. and Potter, P. (eds.), Text and Tradition. Leiden: 263–87.Google Scholar

Strohmaier, G., 2003. ‘Die Ethik Galens und ihre Rezeption in der Welt des Islams’, in Barnes and Jouanna 2003: 307–26. (‘Discussion’: 327–9).

Strohmaier, G., 2007. ‘La longevité de Galien et les deux places de son tombeau’, in Boudon-Millot, Guardasole and Magdaleine 2007: 393–403.

Swain, S., 1996. Hellenism and Empire: Language, Classicism and Power in the Greek World AD 50–250. Oxford.Google Scholar

Swain, S., 2006. ‘Beyond the Limits of Greek Biography: Galen from Alexandria to the Arabs’, in McGing, Brian and Mossman, Judith (eds.), The Limits of Ancient Biography. Swansea: 404–29.Google Scholar

Tecusan, M., 2004. The Fragments of the Methodists: Methodism outside Soranus, vol. 1: Text and Translation. Leiden.Google Scholar

Thillet, P. (ed.), 1984. Alexandre d'Aphrodise:Traité du Destin. Paris.

Tieleman, T., 1991. Diogenes of Babylon and Stoic Embryology: ps.Plut., Plac. V 15.4 Reconsidered', Mnemosyne 44: 106–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tieleman, T., 1996a. Galen and Chrysippus on the Soul: Argument and Refutation in the De Placitis Books I and III. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tieleman, T., 1996b. ‘Galen's Concept of Dialectic and the Middle Platonist Background: The Argument of PHP Book II’, in Vegetti, M. and Gastaldi, S. (eds.), Studi di storia della medicina antica e medievale in memoria di Paola Manuli. Florence: 49–65.Google Scholar

Tieleman, T., 1996c. ‘The Hunt for Galen's Shadow: Alexander of Aphrodisias, De an. pp. 94.7–100.17 Bruns Reconsidered’, in Algra, K., Runia, D. T., Horst, P. W. (eds.), Polyhistor: Studies in the History and Historiography of Greek Philosophy presented to Jaap Mansfeld on his 60th Birthday. Leiden: 265–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tieleman, T., 1998. ‘Plotinus on the Seat of the Soul: Reverberations of Galen and Alexander in Enn. IV3[27], 23’, Phronesis 43: 306–25.Google Scholar

Tieleman, T., 1999. ‘Chrysippus' Therapeutikon and the Corpus Hippocraticum: Some Preliminary Observations’, in Garofalo, I., Manetti, D. and Roselli, A. (eds.), Aspetti della terapia nel Corpus Hippocraticum. Actes du IXe Colloque Hippocratique. Florence: 405–18.Google Scholar

Tieleman, T., 2003a. Chrysippus' On Affections: Reconstruction and Interpretation. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tieleman, T., 2003b. ‘Galen's Psychology’, in Barnes and Jouanna: 131–69.

Tieleman, T., 2005. ‘Galen and Genesis’, in Kooten, G. H. (ed.), The Creation of Heaven and Earth. Leiden: 125–45.Google Scholar

Tieleman, T., 2006. ‘Les Stoiciens sur les tempéraments du corps et de l’âme' in Barras, V., Maire, B., Morand, A.-F. (eds.), Mélanges, crases, tempéraments: La chimie du vivant dans la médecine et la biologie anciennes. Actes du colloque international organisé aux Universités de Lausanne et de Genève. Bibliothèque d'Histoire de la Médecine et de la Santé. Geneva.Google Scholar

Todd, R. B., 1976. Alexander of Aphrodisias on Stoic Physics. Leiden.Google Scholar

Todd, R. B., 1977. ‘Galenic Medical Ideas in the Greek Aristotelian Commentators’, Symbolae Osloenses 52: 117–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Todd, R. B., (ed.), 2003. Themistius. On Aristotle's Physics 4. Ithaca, NY.

Toomer, G. J., 1985. ‘Galen on the Astronomers and Astrologers’, Archive for the History of Exact Science 32: 193–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tosi, R., 1994. ‘La lessicografia e la paremiografia in età alessandrina e il loro sviluppo successivo’, in Montanari 1994: 144–209.

Ullmann, M., 1977. ‘Galens Kommentar zu der Schrift De aere aquis locis’, in Joly: 53–65.

Ullmann, M., 1994. ‘Die arabische Überlieferung der Schriften des Rufus von Ephesos’, in Haase, and Temporini, II.37.2: Berlin: 1293–349.

Vallance, J. T., 1993. ‘The Medical System of Asclepiades of Bithynia’, in Haase, and Temporini, II.37.1: 693–727.

Vallance, J. T., 1999. ‘Galen, Proclus and the Non-submissive Commentary’, in Most 1999: 94–110.

Vander Waerdt, P. A., 1985a. ‘The Peripatetic Interpretation of Plato's Tripartite Psychology’, Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 26: 283–302.Google Scholar

Vander Waerdt, P. A., 1985b. ‘Peripatetic Soul-division, Posidonius, and Middle-Platonic Moral Psychology’, Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 26: 373–94.Google Scholar

Vegetti, M., 1981. ‘Modelli di Medicina in Galeno’ in Nutton 1981: 47–63.

Vegetti, M., 1986. ‘Tradizione e verità: Forme della storiografia filosofico-scientifica nel De placitis di Galeno’, in Cambiano, G. (ed.), Storiografia e dossografia nella filosofia antica. Turin: 227–44.Google Scholar

Vegetti, M., 1993. ‘I nervi dell’ anima', in Kollesch and Nickel 1993: 63–77.

Vegetti, M., 1994. ‘Enciclopedia ed antienciclopedia: Galeno e Sesto Empirico’, in Cambiano, G., Canfora, L. and Lanza, D. (eds.), Lo spazio letterario della Grecia antica vol. I.III. Rome: 333–59.Google Scholar

Vegetti, M., 1996. Il Coltello e lo Stilo: le origini della scienza occidentale. Milan.Google Scholar

Vegetti, M., 1999a. ‘Historiographical Strategies in Galen's Physiology (De usu partium, De naturalibus facultatibus)’, in van der Eijk 1999b: 383–95.

Vegetti, M., 1999b. ‘Tradition and Truth: Forms of Philosophical-Scientific Historiography in Galen's De placitis’, in van der Eijk 1999b: 333–58.

Vegetti, M., 2000. ‘De caelo in terram. Il Timeo in Galeno (De placitis, Quod animi)’, in Brancacci, A. (ed.), La filosofia in età imperiale. Naples: 69–84.Google Scholar

Vegetti, M., 2001. ‘Il confronto degli antichi e dei moderni in Galeno’, in Cajani, G. and Lanza, D. (eds.), L'antico degli antichi. Palermo: 87–100.Google Scholar

Versteegh, K., 1987. ‘Latinitas, Hellenismos, Arabiyya’, in Taylor, D. J. (ed.), The History of Linguistics in the Classical Period. Amsterdam: 251–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vogt, S., 1910. De Galeni in libellum κατ᾽ ἰητρεῖον commentariis (Diss. phil. Marburg).Google Scholar

Wallace-Hadrill, A., 1981. ‘The Emperor and his Virtues’, Historia 30: 298–323.Google Scholar

Wallace-Hadrill, A., 1997. ‘Mutatio morum: The Idea of a Cultural Revolution’, in Habinek, T. and Schiesaro, A. (eds.), The Roman Cultural Revolution. Cambridge: 3–22.Google Scholar

Walzer, R., 1944. Galen on Medical Experience. Oxford.Google Scholar

Walzer, R. and Frede, M., 1985. Galen: Three Treatises on the Nature of Science, translated with introduction by M. Frede. Indianapolis, IN.Google Scholar

Wasserstein, A., 1982. Galen's Commentary on the Hippocratic Treatise Airs, Waters, Places in the Hebrew Translation of Solomon ha-Me'ati. Proceedings of the Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities IV.3. Jerusalem.

Wellmann, M., 1895. Die pneumatische Schule bis auf Archigenes. Berlin.Google Scholar

Wellmann, M., 1898. ‘Die Pflanzennamen des Dioskurides’, Hermes 33 (1898): 360–422.Google Scholar

Wellmann, M., 1912. ‘Zur Geschichte der Medizin im Altertum’, Hermes 47, 1–17.Google Scholar

Wellmann, M., 1931. Hippokratesglossare: Quellen und Studien zur Geschichte der Naturwissenschaften und der Medizin II. Berlin.Google Scholar

Wenkebach, E., 1920. ‘Eine alexandrinische Buchfehde um einen Buchstaben in den hippokratischen Krankengeschichten’, Sitzungsberichte der preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Berlin: 241–53.Google Scholar

Wenkebach, E., 1925. Untersuchungen über Galens Kommentare zu den Epidemien des Hippokrates, Abhandlungen der preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, phil.-hist. Klasse: 1925.I.Google Scholar

Wenkebach, E., 1928. ‘Dichterzitate in Galens Erklärung einer hippokratischen Fieberbezeichnung. Eine textkritische Untersuchung’, Abhandlungen der sächsischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, philosophische-historische Klasse XXXIX: I.Google Scholar

Wenkebach, E. and Pfaff, F. (eds.), 1934. Galeni in Hippocratis Epidemiarum Libros I et II. CMG V.10.1. Berlin.

Wenkebach, E. and Pfaff, F. (eds.), 1956. Galeni in Hippocratis Epidemiarum Librum VI Commentaria I-VIII. CMG V.10.2.2. Berlin.

Wheeler, A. and Jack, W. R., 1963. The Handbook of Medicine (1st edn. 1894 Edinburgh) 12th edn. Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Whitmarsh, T., 2005. The Second Sophistic. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Whittaker, J., 1990. Alcinoos: Enseignement des doctrines de Platon. Paris.Google Scholar

Wiedemann, T., 1992. Emperors and Gladiators. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilkins, J., 2003. ‘Foreword’, in Powell, 2003: 9–21.

Wilkins, J., 2005. ‘The Social and Intellectual Context of Regimen II’, in van der Eijk 2005b: 121–33.

Wilkins, J., 2007. ‘Galen and Athenaeus in the Hellenistic Library’, in König and Whitmarsh 2007b: 69–87.

Winterbottom, M. (ed.), 1984. The Minor Declamations ascribed to Quintilian. Berlin.

Zambon, M., 2002. Porphyre et le Moyen-Platonisme. Paris.Google Scholar

Ziegler, K., 1951. ‘Plutarchos von Chaironeia’, in Pauly, A. F., Wissowa, G., Kroll, W. (eds.), Real-enzyklopaedie der klassichen. RE41. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Zonta, M., 1995. ‘Un interprete ebreo della filosofia di Galeno: gli scritti filosofici di Galeno nell'opera di Shem Tob ibn Falaquera’. Eurasiatica 39: 113–23.Google Scholar