Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T13:09:18.249Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Ontogeny of dispositional learning and the reward-schedule effects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 March 2010

Abram Amsel
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
Get access

Summary

In D. O. Hebb's last book, Essays on Mind (1980), there is the following passage:

The argument [can be made] that the behavioral signs of mind and consciousness are evident only in the mammals, with the possible exception of some of the larger-brained birds; that relatively small-brained mammals like the rat or the hamster may have very small minds (like the penguins of Anatole France's Penguin Island, to whom the Lord gave souls but of a smaller size) – but still minds, whereas fish and reptiles, and most birds, seem to be reflexively programmed and give little evidence of that inner control to which the term mind refers. The best evidence of continuity, in the development from lower to higher mammals, is to be found not only in their intellectual attainments, their capacities for learning and solving problems, but also in their motivations and emotions. Man is evidently the most intelligent animal but also, it seems, the most emotional.

(p. 47)

This statement, in Hebb's colorful prose, is an example, in phylogenetic terms, of a kind of thinking that, in its ontogenetic counterpart as well as in levels of functioning in the adult mammal, is seen increasingly in our field (e.g., Amsel & Stanton, 1980; Bitterman, 1960, 1975; Livesey, 1986; Schneirla, 1959; Wickelgren, 1979). My own point (Amsel, 1972b) was (and is) that there is a level of classical conditioning that is purely dispositional, involves implicit memory, and is less dependent on mediation than what is usually called Pavlovian conditioning, and that both levels involve a lesser degree of mediation than instrumental learning.

Type
Chapter
Information
Frustration Theory
An Analysis of Dispositional Learning and Memory
, pp. 137 - 173
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×