Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of illustrations
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Note on transliteration
- Glossary
- 1 Writing tribal history
- PART I The Safavid state and the origins of the Shahsevan
- PART II The rise of the Shahsevan confederacy
- PART III The Shahsevan tribes in the Great Game
- PART IV The end of the tribal confederacy
- Appendices
- Bibliography
- Index of topics
- Index of places, peoples, persons, dynasties, parties, companies
- Index of authors quoted or discussed
- Index of tribal names
- Plate section
PART III - The Shahsevan tribes in the Great Game
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 March 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of illustrations
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Note on transliteration
- Glossary
- 1 Writing tribal history
- PART I The Safavid state and the origins of the Shahsevan
- PART II The rise of the Shahsevan confederacy
- PART III The Shahsevan tribes in the Great Game
- PART IV The end of the tribal confederacy
- Appendices
- Bibliography
- Index of topics
- Index of places, peoples, persons, dynasties, parties, companies
- Index of authors quoted or discussed
- Index of tribal names
- Plate section
Summary
‘Shahsevan’ is a Turkish word, which means ‘lover of the Shah’; the measure of their Shah-love in the past was that, whenever the central state was strong enough, they were obedient servants of the state and the Shah, otherwise they brought ceaseless unrest by their plundering …’
Baba Safari, Ardabil dar Gozargah-e Tarikh, p. 160.Russia's Caucasian frontier with Iran was in many ways as crucial an arena of the nineteenth-century Great Game as British India's frontier with Afghanistan. Both were of considerable strategic importance, and were crossed by major Asian trade routes. The main differences were in the nature of the terrain and the population. While the mountain ranges of the North-West Frontier of India were of marginal agricultural value, rugged, remote and defensible, Transcaucasia included some of the most fertile agricultural lands of the area and for this reason, as well as its comparative accessibility, could not provide so remote and defensible a refuge where tribal populations could flaunt their political autonomy in the face of the competing states and empires.
The two Russo–Iranian wars of the early nineteenth century raged across Shahsevan territory and resulted in the conquest of the best part of their winter quarters in Moghan by Russia. Chapter Eight narrates the main events leading to this turning point in Shahsevan history, laying stress on the role which the tribes and chiefs of Moghan are known to have played during the campaigns, and on the movements of tribes southwards at the end.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Frontier Nomads of IranA Political and Social History of the Shahsevan, pp. 147 - 148Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1997