Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:16:34.033Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - History of Efforts to Codify Crimes Against Humanity

From the Charter of Nuremberg to the Statute of Rome

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2011

By
Roger S. Clark
Edited by
Leila Nadya Sadat
Roger S. Clark
Affiliation:
Rutgers School of Law, Camden
Leila Nadya Sadat
Affiliation:
Washington University, St Louis
Get access

Summary

THE NUREMBERG CHARTER

The modern usage of the words “crimes against humanity” dates from the Nuremberg Charter, article 6(c) of which reads as follows:

CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY: namely, murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation or other inhumane acts committed against any civilian population, before or during the war, or persecutions on political, racial or religious grounds in execution of or in connection with any crime within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal, whether or not in violation of the domestic law of the country where perpetrated.

I doubt very much that the drafters of the Nuremberg Charter who gathered in London from June 26 to August 8, 1945 saw themselves as engaged in a codification exercise. In retrospect, the characterization is perhaps not inappropriate, although the term “crimes against humanity,” which provided a catchy title in the Charter to go along with “crime against peace” and “war crimes,” did not make an appearance in the drafting until the very last moment. Until then, the talk had been of “atrocities,” “persecutions,” and sometimes “deportations” (it apparently being understood that these were for the purpose of slave labor).

Probably the closest example of usage hinting at what would be “codified” in London was in the declaration of May 28, 1915 by the Governments of France, Great Britain, and Russia concerning the massacres of the Armenian population in Turkey, killings to which the term “genocide” has also since been applied.

Type
Chapter
Information
Forging a Convention for Crimes against Humanity , pp. 8 - 27
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Clark, Roger S., Crimes against Humanity at Nuremberg, inThe Nuremberg Trial and International Law 177 (George Ginsburgs & V. N. Kudriavtsev eds., 1990)Google Scholar
Clark, Roger S., Crimes against Humanity and the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, inInternational and National Law in Russia and Eastern Europe: Essays in Honor of George Ginsburgs 139 (Roger Clark, Ferdinand Feldbrugge & Stanislaw Pomorski eds., 2001)Google Scholar
Hall, Christopher K. et al., Article 7, Crimes against HumanityinCommentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observers' Notes, Article by Article 159 (2d ed. 2008)Google Scholar
deGuzman, Margaret McAuliffe, The Road from Rome: The Developing Law of Crimes against Humanity, 22 Hum. Rts. Q. 335 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Jacob, The International Military Tribunal and the Holocaust: Some Legal Reflections, 7 Isr. L. Rev. 1, 3 (1972)Google Scholar
Schwelb, Egon, Crimes Against Humanity, 23 Brit.Y.B. Int'l L. 181 (1946)Google Scholar
Doria, José, Whether Crimes against Humanity Are Backdoor War Crimes, inThe Legal Regime of the International Criminal Court: Essays in Honour of Professor Igor Blishchenko 645 (José Doria, Hans-Peter Gasser & M. Cherif Bassiouni eds., 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lansing, Robert, Notes on World Sovereignty, 1 Am. J. Int'l L. 13, 25 (1921)Google Scholar
Paust, Jordan J., Threats to Accountability after Nuremberg: Crimes against Humanity, Leader Responsibility and National Fora, 12 N.Y.L. Sch. J. Hum. Rts. 545, 549 (1996)Google Scholar
Dautricourt, Joseph Y., Crime against Humanity: European Views on its Conception and its Future, 40 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 170 (1949)Google ScholarPubMed
Dyilo, LubangaConfirmation Proceedings, 19 Crim. L.F. 519, 542–50 (2008)Google Scholar
McCormack, Timothy L. H. & Simpson, Gerry J., The International Law Commission's Draft Code of Crimes against the Peace and Security of Mankind: An Appraisal of the Substantive Provisions, 5 Crim. L.F. 1 (1994)Google Scholar
Rayfuse, Rosemary, The Draft Code of Crimes against the Peace and Security of Mankind: Eating Disorders at the International Law Commission, 5 Crim. L.F. 43 (1997) (discussing 1996 draft)Google Scholar
Oosterveld, Valerie, The Special Court for Sierra Leone's Consideration of Gender-based Violence: Contributing to Transnational Justice?, 10 Hum. Rts. Rev. 73, 89 (2009)Google Scholar
Oosterveld, Valerie, The Definition of “Gender” in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Step Forward or Back for International Criminal Justice?, 18 Harv. Hum. Rts. J. 55 (2005)Google Scholar
Askin, Kelly D., Women and International Humanitarian Law, in 1 Women and International Human Rights Law 51–54 (Kelly D. Askin & Dorean M. Koenig eds., 1999)Google Scholar
Berman, Maureen R. & Clark, Roger S., State Terrorism: Disappearances, 13 Rutgers L.J. 531 (1982)Google Scholar
Robinson, Darryl, Defining Crimes against Humanity at the Rome Conference, 93 Am. J. Int'l L. 43, 58 n.76 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Roger S., The Mental Element in International Criminal Law: The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and the Elements of Offences, 12 Crim. L.F. 291 (2001)Google Scholar
Dyilo, LubangaConfirmation Proceedings, 19 Crim. L.F. 519, 521–23 (2008)Google Scholar
Clark, Roger S., Elements of Crimes in Early Confirmation Decisions of Pre-Trial Chambers of the International Criminal Court, 6 N.Z.Y.B. Int'l L. (2008)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×