Allcott, H. 2015. ‘Site selection bias in program evaluation’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 130(3): 1117–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, D. M. and Edwards, B. C. 2014. ‘Unfulfilled promise: laboratory experiments in public management research’, Public Management Review doi: 10.1080/14719037.2014.943272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arceneaux, K. and Butler, D. M. 2015. ‘How not to increase participation in local government: the advantages of experiments when testing policy interventions’, Public Administration Review Early view.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Avellaneda, C. N. 2013. ‘Mayoral decision-making: issue salience, decision context, and choice constraint? An experimental study with 120 Latin American mayors’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 23: 631–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bækgaard, M. Baethge, C. Blom-Hansen, J., Dunlop, C., Esteve, M., Jakobsen, M., Kisida, B., Marvel, J., Moseley, A., Serritzlew, S., Stewart, P., Kjaergaard Thomsen, M. and Wolf, P. 2015. ‘Conducting experiments in public management research: a practical guide’, International Public Management Journal 18(2): 323–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Banerjee, A. V. and Duflo, E. 2014. ‘The experimental approach to development economics’, in Field Experiments and Their Critics: Essays on the Uses and Abuses of Experimentation in the Social Sciences, edited by Teele, Dawn Langan, 78–114. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Barnow, B. S. 2010. ‘Setting up social experiments: the good, the bad, and the ugly’, Zeitschrift für Arbeitsmarkt Forschung 43: 91–105.Google Scholar

Barrett, C. B. and Carter, M. R. 2014. ‘Retreat from radical skepticism: rebalancing theory, observational data, and randomization in development economics’, in Field Experiments and Their Critics: Essays on the Uses and Abuses of Experimentation in the Social Sciences, edited by Teele, Dawn Langan, 58–77. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Beath, A., Fontina, C. and Enikolopov, R. 2013. ‘Empowering women through development aid: evidence from a field experiment in Afghanistan’, American Political Science Review 107: 540–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Belle, N. 2015. ‘Performance-related pay and the crowding out of motivation in the public sector: a randomized field experiment’, Public Administration Review 75 (2): 230–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonetti, S. 1998. ‘Experimental economics and deception’, Journal of Economic Psychology 19: 377–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyne, G. A., James, O., John, P. and Petrovsky, N. 2009. ‘Democracy and government performance: holding incumbents accountable in English local governments’, Journal of Politics 71(4): 1273–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bozeman, B and Scott, P. 1992. ‘Laboratory experiments in public management and management’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 2(4): 293–313.Google Scholar

Brewer, G. A. and Brewer, G. A. Jr. 2011. ‘Parsing public/private differences in work motivation and performance: an experimental study’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21(suppl 3): i347–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butler, D. M. 2010. ‘Monitoring bureaucratic compliance: using field experiments to improve governance’, Public Sector Digest 2010 (winter): 41–4.Google Scholar

Butler, D. M. and Brockman, D. E. 2011. ‘Do politicians racially discriminate against constituents? A field experiment on state legislators’, American Journal of Political Science 55: 463–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Card, D., DellaVigna, S. and Malmendier, U. 2011. ‘The role of theory in field experiments’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 25(3): 39–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colson, G. Corrigan, J. R., Grebitus, G., Loureiro, M. L. and Rousu, M. C. 2015. ‘Which deceptive practices, if any, should be allowed in experimental economics research? Results from surveys of applied experimental economists and students’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Early View 1–12. doi: 10.1093/ajae/aav067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coppock, A. and Green, D. P. 2015. ‘Assessing the correspondence between experimental results obtained in the lab and field: a review of recent social science research’, Political Science Research and Methods 3: 113–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cotterill, S. and Richardson, R. 2010. ‘Expanding the use of experiments on civic behavior: experiments with local governments as research partners’, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 628: 148–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Druckman, J. N. and Kam, C. D. 2011. ‘Students as experimental participants: a defense of the “narrow database”’, in Handbook of Experimental Political Science, edited by Druckman, James, Green, Donald P., Kuklinski, James H. and Lupia, Arthur, 41–57. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duflo, E., Glennerster, R. and Kremer, M. 2006. Using Randomization in Development Economics Research: A Toolkit. Cambridge, National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunning, T. 2012. Natural Experiments in the Social Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Falk, A. and Heckman, J. J. 2009. ‘Lab experiments are a major source of knowledge in the social sciences’, Science 326(5952): 535–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fisher, R. A. 1926. ‘The arrangement of field experiments’, Journal of the Ministry of Agriculture of Great Britain 33: 503–13.Google Scholar

Fisher, R. A. 1935. Design of Experiments. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar

Gerber, A. S. and Green, D. P. 2012. Field Experiments: Design, Analysis and Interpretation. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Green, D. P. and Thorley, D. 2014. ‘Field experimentation and the study of law and policy’, Annual Review of Law and Social Science 10: 53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guala, F. 2005. The Methodology of Experimental Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrison, G., Lau, M. and Williams, M. 2002. ‘Estimating individual discount rates in Denmark: a field experiment’, American Economic Review 92(5): 1606–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrison, G. W. and List, J. A. 2004. ‘Field experiments’, Journal of Economic Literature 42(4): 1009–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henrich, J., Heine, S. J. and Norenzayan, A. 2010. ‘Beyond WEIRD: towards a broadbased behavioural science’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33(2–3): 111–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hertwig, R. and Ortmann, R. 2008. ‘Deception in experiments: revisiting the arguments in its defense’, Ethics and Behavior 18 (1): 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hess, D. R., Hanmer, M. J. and Nickerson, D. M. 2015. ‘Encouraging local bureaucratic compliance with federal civil rights laws: field experiments with agencies implementing the national voter registration act’, unpublished paper. www.douglasrhess.com/uploads/4/3/7/8/43789009/hess_hanmer_nickerson_may_2015_nvra_compliance.pdf. Accessed 8 August 2015.Google Scholar

Jakobsen, M. 2013. ‘Can government initiatives increase citizen coproduction? Results of a randomized field experiment’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 23(1): 27–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jakobsen, M. and Andersen, S. 2013. ‘Coproduction and equity in public service delivery’, Public Administration Review 73(5): 704–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

James, O. 2011. ‘Performance measures and democracy: information effects on citizens in field and laboratory experiments’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21: 399–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

James, O. and Moseley, A. 2014. ‘Does performance information about public services affect citizens’ perceptions, satisfaction, and voice behaviour? Field experiments with absolute and relative performance information’. Public Administration 92(2): 493–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

John, P. (2016) Experimentation in Political Science and Public Policy The Challenge and Promise of Field Trials. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

John, P., Cotterill, S., Moseley, A., Richardson, L., Smith, G., Stoker, G. and Wales, C. 2011. Nudge, Nudge, Think, Think: Experimenting with Ways to Change Civic Behaviour. London: Bloomsbury Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levitt, S. D. and List, J. A. 2009. ‘Field experiments in economics: the past, the present, and the future’, European Economic Review 53: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

List, J. 2011. ’Why economists should conduct field experiments and 14 tips for pulling one off’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 25(3): 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

List, J. and Metcalfe, R. 2014. ‘Field experiments in the developed world: an introduction’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 30(4): 585–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manzi, J. 2012. Uncontrolled: The Surprising Payoff of Trial-and-Error for Business, Politics, and Society. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Margetts, H. Z. 2011. ‘Experiments for public management research’, Public Management Review 13(2): 189–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McClendon, G. H. 2012. ‘Ethics of using public officials as field experiment subjects’, Newsletter of the APSA Experimental Section 3: 13–20.Google Scholar

Medical Research Council 1948. ‘Streptomycin treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis’, British Medical Journal 2(4582): 769–82.Google Scholar

Moher, D., Hopewell, S., Schulz, K. F., Montori, V., Gøtzsche, P. C., Devereaux, P. J., Elbourne, D., Egger, M., Altman, D. G. 2010. ‘CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials’, British Medical Journal 340: c869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moseley, A., James, O., John, P. Richardson, L. Ryan, M. and Stoker, G. 2015. ‘Can approaches shown to increase monetary donations to charity also increase voluntary donations of time? Evidence from field experiments using social information’, Unpublished working paper.Google Scholar

Moseley, A. and Stoker, G. 2015. ‘Putting public policy defaults to the test: the case of organ donor registration’, International Public Management Journal 18(2): 246–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mutz, D. C. 2011. Population-Based Survey Experiments. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Olken, B. 2007. ‘Monitoring corruption: evidence from a field experiment in Indonesia’, Journal of Political Economy 115: 200–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orr, L. L. 1999. Social Experiments: Evaluating Public Programs with Experimental Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Pawson, R. and Tilley, N. 1997. Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Riccio, J. and Bloom, H. S. 2002. ‘Extending the reach of randomized social experiments: new directions in evaluations of American welfare-to-work and employment initiatives’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 165: 13–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rothwell, P. M. 2015. ‘External validity of randomized controlled trials: to whom do the results of this trial apply?’ The Lancet 365: 82–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rousu, M. C., Colson, G., Corrigan, J. R., Grebitus, C. and Loureiro, M. L. 2015. ‘Deception in experiments: towards guidelines on use in applied economics research’, Applied Economic Perspectives and Psychology 37(3): 524–36.Google Scholar

Salovey, P. and Williams-Piehota, P. 2004. ‘Field experiments in social psychology message framing and the promotion of health protective behaviors’, American Behavioral Scientist 47(5): 488–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Salsburg, D. 2001. The Lady Tasting Tea: How Statistics Revolutionized Science in the Twentieth Century. New York WH Freeman.Google Scholar

Shadish, William R., Cook, T. D. Thomas D., and Campbell, Donald T. 2002. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar

Shafir, E. (ed.) 2013. The Behavioral Foundations of Public Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sherman, L. W. and Rogan, D. P. 1995. ‘Deterrent effects of police raids on crack houses: a randomized, controlled experiment’, Justice Quarterly 12: 755–81.Google Scholar

Sherman, L., Rogan, D., Edwards, T., Whipple, R., Shreve, D., Witcher, D., Trimble, W., The Street Narcotics Unit, Velke, R., Blumberg, M., Beatty, A. and Bridgeforth, C. 1995. ‘Deterrent effects of police raids on crack houses: a randomized, controlled experiment’, Justice Quarterly 12: 755–81.Google Scholar

Sherman, L. W. and Weisburd, D. 1995. ‘General deterrent effects of police patrol in crime hot spots: a randomized, controlled trial’, Justice Quarterly 12(4): 635–48.Google Scholar

Soloman, P., Cavanaugh, M. M. and Draine, J. 2009. Randomized Controlled Trials: Design and Implementation for Community Based Psychosocial Interventions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Teele, D. L. 2015. ‘Reflections on the ethics of field experiments’, in Field Experiments and Their Critics: Essays on the Uses and Abuses of Experimentation in the Social Sciences, edited by Teele, Dawn Langan, 115–40. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Torgerson, D. J. and Torgerson, C. J. 2008. Designing Randomized Trials in Health, Education and the Social Sciences. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vivalt, E. 2015. ‘Heterogeneous treatment effects in impact evaluation’, American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings 105: 467–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Worthy, B., John, P. and Vannoni, M. 2015. ‘Information requests and local accountability: an experimental analysis of local parish responses to an informational campaign’, Unpublished paper.Google Scholar

Yates, F. 1964. ‘Sir Ronald Fisher and the design of experiments’, Biometrics 20: 307–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar