Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T13:35:14.927Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

3 - Existence of EU external competence

Bart Van Vooren  and
Ramses A. Wessel
Bart Van Vooren
Affiliation:
ALTIUS, Brussels
Ramses A. Wessel
Affiliation:
University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
Get access

Summary

Central issues

  • The EU possesses legal personality and capacity to act as a legal subject in international relations. However, the EU cannot undertake whatever international action it wishes. Its capacity is governed by the principle of conferral laid down in Article 5 TFEU, which states that the Union shall act within the powers conferred on it by the Member States. As regards external competence of the Union, we distinguish between the existence, nature and scope of that power.

  • In this chapter we examine the conditions under which competence to act externally will exist for the Union. First, this is the case when the Treaty expressly confers such external competence on the Union. Second, such competence may also be implied when, pursuant to the ERTA principle, the EU has adopted internal rules on the basis of expressly conferred internal powers; or when, pursuant to the complementarity principle, in the absence of internal rules, it is necessary to attain an EU Treaty objective for which the Treaty confers upon the Union an internal power. Third, when none of the above-mentioned sources are available, recourse to Article 352 TFEU is possible if this is necessary to attain objectives set for the Union in the EU Treaties.

  • Political battles between the institutions and Member States over international presence and representation have regularly translated into litigation concerning the question of whether the EU actually has competence at all. In resolving these conflicts, the CJEU has shown itself sensitive to the legal–political context of European integration in which the legal proceedings took place. At times borderline activist, at other times protective of Member States’ sovereignty, the role of the CJEU in this area of law, and consequently in the development of the EU as an international actor, cannot be understated.

    • Type
    Chapter
    Information
    EU External Relations Law
    Text, Cases and Materials
     , pp. 74 - 98
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press
    Print publication year: 2014

    Access options

    Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

    References

    Collinson, D. S., ‘The Foreign Relations Powers of the European Communities: A Comment on Commission v. Council’ (1971) 23 Stanford Law Review 956–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Cremona, M., ‘Defining Competence in EU External Relations: Lessons from the Treaty Reform Process’, in Dashwood, A. and Maresceau, M. (eds.), Law and Practice of EU External Relations – Salient Features of a Changing Landscape (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
    Cremona, M., ‘External Relations and External Competence: The Emergence of an Integrated Policy’, in Craig, P. and de Búrca, G. (eds.), The Evolution of EU Law, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
    Cremona, M., ‘The Draft Constitutional Treaty: External Relations and External Action’ (2003) 40 Common Market Law Review 1347–1366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Dashwood, A., ‘The Attribution of External Relations Competence’, in Dashwood, A. and Hillion, C. (eds.), The General Law of EC External Relations (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 2000).Google Scholar
    Dashwood, A., ‘The Limits of European Community Powers’ (1996) 21 European Law Review 113–128.Google Scholar
    Dashwood, A. and Heliskoski, J., ‘The Classic Authorities Revisited’, in Dashwood, A. and Hillion, C. (eds.), The General Law of EC External Relations (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 2000).Google Scholar
    De Baere, G., Constitutional Principles of EU External Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Eeckhout, P., ‘Bold Constitutionalism and Beyond’, in Poiares Maduro, M. and Azoulai, L. (eds.), The Past and Future of EU Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2010).Google Scholar
    Eeckhout, P., EU External Relations Law, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Gaja, G., ‘Annotation: Opinion 2/94 (EC Accession to the ECHR)’ (1996) 33 Common Market Law Review 975–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Ganshof Van der Meersch, W. J., ‘Les Relations Extérieures de la CEE dans le Domaine des Politiques Communes et l’Arrêt de la Cour de Justice du 31 mars 1971’ (1972) Cahiers de Droit Européen 127–158.Google Scholar
    Hillion, C., ‘ERTA, ECHR and Open Skies: Laying the Grounds of the EU System of External Relations’, in Poiares Maduro, M. and Azoulai, L. (eds.), The Past and Future of EU Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2010).Google Scholar
    Holdgaard, R., External Relations Law of the European Community: Legal Reasoning and Legal Discourses (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2008).Google Scholar
    Klamert, M., New Conferral or Old Confusion? – The Perils of Making Implied Competences Explicit and the Example of the External Competence for Environmental Policy (The Hague: CLEER Working Paper, 2011/6).Google Scholar
    Koutrakos, P., EU International Relations Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2006).Google Scholar
    Kuijper, P. J., De Eerste Zaak ooit tussen de Commissie en de Raad. Het Recht van de Europese Unie in 50 Klassieke Arresten (The Hague: Boom Juridische Uitgevers, 2010).Google Scholar
    Post, R., ‘Constructing the European Polity: ERTA and the Open Skies Judgments’, in Poiares Maduro, M. and Azoulai, L. (eds.), The Past and Future of EU Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2010).Google Scholar
    Temple Lang, J., ‘The ERTA Judgment and the Court’s Case-Law on Competence and Conflict’ (1986) 6 Yearbook of European Law 183–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Tridimas, T. and Eeckhout, P., ‘The External Competence of the Community and the Case-Law of the Court of Justice: Principle versus Pragmatism’ (1994) 14 Yearbook of European Law 143–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Van Vooren, B., EU External Relations Law and the European Neighbourhood Policy: A Paradigm for Coherence (Abingdon/New York: Routledge, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Waelbroeck, M., ‘L’Arrêt AETR et les Compétences Externes de la Communauté Économique Européenne’ (1971) Integration 79–89.Google Scholar
    Weiler, J. H. H., ‘The Transformation of Europe’ (1991) 100 Yale Law Journal 2403–2483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Weiler, J. H. H. and Fries, S., ‘A Human Rights Policy for the European Community and Union: The Question of Competences’, in Alston, P. (ed.), The EU and Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
    Wessel, R. A., ‘Revisiting the International Legal Status of the EU’ (2000) 5 European Foreign Affairs Review 507–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Winter, J. A., ‘Casenote Case C-22/70’ (1971) 8 Common Market Law Review 550–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Dashwood, A., ‘The Attribution of External Relations Competence’, in Dashwood, A. and Hillion, C. (eds.), The General Law of EC External Relations (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 2000), p. 116.Google Scholar
    Holdgaard, R., External Relations Law of the European Community: Legal Reasoning and Legal Discourses (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2008), p. 22.Google Scholar
    Cremona, M., ‘The Draft Constitutional Treaty: External Relations and External Action’ (2003) 40 Common Market Law Review 1347–1366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Koutrakos, P., EU International Relations Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2006), p. 10.Google Scholar
    Klamert, M., New Conferral or Old Confusion? – The Perils of Making Implied Competences Explicit and the Example of the External Competence for Environmental Policy (The Hague: CLEER Working Paper, 2011/6).Google Scholar
    Eeckhout, P., EU External Relations Law, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), p. 71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Temple Lang, J., ‘The ERTA Judgment and the Court’s Case-Law on Competence and Conflict’ (1986) 6 Yearbook of European Law 183–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    de Baere, G., Constitutional Principles of EU External Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 34–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Tridimas, T. and Eeckhout, , ‘The External Competence of the Community and the Case-Law of the Court of Justice: Principle versus Pragmatism’ (1994) 14 Yearbook of European Law 143–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Eeckhout, , ‘Bold Constitutionalism and Beyond’, in Poiares Maduro, M. and Azoulai, L. (eds.), The Past and Future of EU Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2010), p. 218.Google Scholar
    Gaja, G., ‘Annotation: Opinion 2/94 (EC Accession to the ECHR)’ (1996) 33 Common Market Law Review 984–985Google Scholar
    Weiler, J. H. H. and Fries, S., ‘A Human Rights Policy for the European Community and Union: The Question of Competences’, in Alston, P. (ed.), The EU and Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
    Weiler, , ‘The Transformation of Europe’ (1991) 100 Yale Law Journal 2416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

    Save book to Kindle

    To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Available formats
    ×

    Save book to Dropbox

    To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

    Available formats
    ×

    Save book to Google Drive

    To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

    Available formats
    ×