Armed humanitarian intervention and  the problem of abuse after Libya

doi:10.1017/CBO9781139567589.013

9 - Armed humanitarian intervention and the problem of abuse after Libya

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2014

Luke Glanville

Edited by

Don E. Scheid

Show author details

Luke Glanville: Affiliation:
Australian National University
Don E. Scheid: Affiliation:
Winona State University, Minnesota

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Antient and modern History indeed informs us, that Avarice and Ambition do frequently lay hold on such Excuses; but the Use that wicked Men make of a Thing, does not always hinder it from being just in itself.

(Hugo Grotius, The Rights of War and Peace, 1625)

We are aware that any altruistic concept may be abused by the powerful. We know this from experience. Although they might seek to legitimize interventions that have little or nothing to do with – in this case – the four major crimes, the misuse of a concept does not invalidate it.

(Heraldo Muñoz, Chilean Ambassador to the United Nations, 2009)

Introduction

The idea of armed humanitarian intervention has long been attended with warnings that it will be abused by powerful states seeking to justify wars fought not for humanitarian purposes but for self-interest. This problem of abuse has received renewed attention in the wake of NATO’s recent intervention in Libya. Critics charge that NATO misappropriated a UN Security Council resolution authorizing limited use of force to protect civilians and that it instead waged an expansive military campaign in pursuit of self-interested objectives of regime change and the establishment of favorable diplomatic and trade relations. As it has in the past, such apparent abuse has led some critics to reject the idea of a right of humanitarian military intervention in any form.

Keywords

society of states problem of abuse armed humanitarian intervention Libya NATO

Type: Chapter
Information: The Ethics of Armed Humanitarian Intervention , pp. 148 - 165

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139567589.013 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Grotius, Hugo, The Rights of War and Peace, 3 vols., edited by Tuck, Richard (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2005)Google Scholar

Waley, Arthur, Three Ways of Thought in Ancient China (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1939), 137–43Google Scholar

Pufendorf, Samuel, The Law of Nature and Nations, translated by Kennett, Basil (London: 1729), Bk. VIII, chap. VI, sec. 14Google Scholar

de Vattel, Emer, The Law of Nations, edited by Kapossy, Béla and Whatmore, Richard (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2008)Google Scholar

Weiss, Thomas G., “The Sunset of Humanitarian Intervention? The Responsibility to Protect in a Unipolar Era,” Security Dialogue 35, no. 2 (2004), 135–53CrossRef Google Scholar

International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (ICISS), The Responsibility to Protect: Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (Ottawa: International Development Research Centre, 2001), XII–XIIIGoogle Scholar

Bellamy, Alex J., “The Responsibility to Protect–Five Years On,” Ethics & International Affairs 24, no. 2 (2010), 150–53CrossRef Google Scholar

Wheeler, Nicholas J., Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society (Oxford University Press, 2000), 39Google Scholar

Daalder, Ivo H. and Stavridis, James G., “NATO’s Victory in Libya: The Right Way to Run an Intervention,” Foreign Affairs 91, no. 2 (2012), 3Google Scholar

Hopkins, Nick and Norton-Taylor, Richard, “NATO Winds Down Libyan War Effort after 26,000 Air Missions,” The Guardian (October 20, 2011)Google Scholar

Chivers, C.J. and Schmitt, Eric, “In Strikes on Libya by NATO, an Unspoken Civilian Toll,” New York Times (December 17, 2011)Google Scholar

Wheeler, Nicholas J. and Morris, Justin, “Justifying the Iraq War as a Humanitarian Intervention: The Cure is Worse Than the Disease,” in Thakur, Ramesh and Sidhu, Waheguru Pal Singh (eds.), The Iraq Crisis and World Order: Structural, Institutional and Normative Challenges (Tokyo: United Nations University Press, 2006), 444–63Google Scholar

Bellamy, Alex J., “Responsibility to Protect or Trojan Horse? The Crisis in Darfur and Humanitarian Intervention after Iraq,” Ethics & International Affairs 19, no. 2 (2005), 31–54CrossRef Google Scholar

Mueller, John, “War Has Almost Ceased to Exist: An Assessment,” Political Science Quarterly 124, no. 2 (2009), 297–321CrossRef Google Scholar

Goodman, Ryan, “Humanitarian Intervention and Pretexts for War,” American Journal of International Law 100 (2006), 110CrossRef Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel, “Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch,” in Political Writings, edited by Reiss, Hans (Cambridge University Press, 1970), 103Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, Hersch, “Kelsen’s Pure Science of Law,” in Lauterpacht, Elihu (ed.), International Law: Being the Collected Papers of Hersch Lauterpacht (Cambridge University Press, 1975), vol. 5, part 1, 428Google Scholar

Franceschet, Antonio, “Kant, International Law, and the Problem of Humanitarian Intervention,” Journal of International Political Theory 6, no. 1 (2010), 1–22CrossRef Google Scholar

Bellamy, Alex J., “The Responsibility to Protect and the Problem of Military Intervention,” International Affairs 84, no. 4 (2008), 625–30CrossRef Google Scholar

Book contents

9 - Armed humanitarian intervention and the problem of abuse after Libya

Summary

Keywords

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive