Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-10T03:10:49.282Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Co-Evolution of Technological Design and Pedagogy in an Online Learning Community

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Amy Bruckman
Affiliation:
Georgia Institute of Technology
Sasha Barab
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Rob Kling
Affiliation:
Indiana University
James H. Gray
Affiliation:
SRI International, Stanford, California
Get access

Summary

The design of any piece of technology intended for human use – whether for entertainment, work, or education – is ideally iterative and user-centered. Designers cannot anticipate all the needs of users, but most begin with a prototype and revise it based on user feedback. This is even more true of online learning communities, where designers must understand the needs not just of individual users, but of groups of users and their complex interrelationships as facilitated by the technology. Designers begin with theory, create a prototype, test, and then revise. However, it is not just the technology that can be revised, but also the underlying theory. Technological design and pedagogy have the potential to co-evolve in this new medium.

In this chapter, I will describe in detail one example of this co-evolution: a new perspective on motivation in constructionist learning environments, which evolved through quantitative and qualitative observations of an online learning community called MOOSE Crossing. These observations led to a significant design change to the environment (the addition of a system of “merit badges”), and this in turn led to further reflections on pedagogy.

BACKGROUND: CONSTRUCTIONISM IN A COMMUNITY CONTEXT

In Mindstorms, Seymour Papert has a vision of a “technological samba school.” At samba schools in Brazil, a community of people of all ages gather together to prepare a presentation for Carnival. “Members of the school range in age from children to grandparents and in ability from novice to professional. But they dance together and as they dance everyone is learning and teaching as well as dancing. Even the stars are there to learn their difficult parts” (Papert, 1980, p.178).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baron, J. B., & Wolf, D. P. (Eds.). (1996). Performance-Based Student Assessment: Challenges and Possibilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Bruckman, A. (1997). MOOSE Crossing: Construction, Community, and Learning in a Networked Virtual World for Kids. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT
Bruckman, A. (1998). Community Support for Constructionist Learning. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 7, 47–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruckman, A., Jensen, C., & DeBonte, A. (2002). Gender and Programming Achievement in a CSCL Environment. Paper presented at the CSCL, Boulder, CO, January 1, 2002CrossRef
Bruckman, A., & Resnick, M. (1995). The MediaMOO Project: Constructionism and Professional Community. Convergence, 1(1), 94–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chi, M. T. (1997). Quantifying Qualitative Analyses of Verbal Data: A Practical Guide. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(3), 271–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. New York: Macmillan
Falbel, A. (1989). Friskolen 70: An Ethnographically Informed Inquiry Into the Social Context of Learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1987). Learning Together & Alone. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
Kafai, Y., & Resnick, M. (Eds.). (1996). Constructionism in Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Newman, D., Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1989). The Construction Zone: Working for Cognitive Change in School. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Oldenburg, R. (1989). The Great Good Place. New York: Paragon House
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. New York: Basic Books
Papert, S. (1991). Situating Constructionism. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism (p. 518). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing
Rogoff, B. (1994). Developing Understanding of the Idea of Communities of Learners. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 1(4), 209–229Google Scholar
Spring, J. (1972). Education and the Rise of the Corporate State. Boston: Beacon Press

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×