Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction: Understanding the governance of security
- 1 Reflections on the refusal to acknowledge private governments
- 2 Transnational security governance
- 3 Two case studies of American anti-terrorism
- 4 Power struggles in the field of security: implications for democratic transformation
- 5 Policing and security as ‘club goods’: the new enclosures?
- 6 The state, the people and democratic policing: the case of South Africa
- 7 Necessary virtues: the legitimate place of the state in the production of security
- 8 From security to health
- 9 Research and innovation in the field of security: a nodal governance view
- Conclusion: The future of democracy
- References
- Index
8 - From security to health
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction: Understanding the governance of security
- 1 Reflections on the refusal to acknowledge private governments
- 2 Transnational security governance
- 3 Two case studies of American anti-terrorism
- 4 Power struggles in the field of security: implications for democratic transformation
- 5 Policing and security as ‘club goods’: the new enclosures?
- 6 The state, the people and democratic policing: the case of South Africa
- 7 Necessary virtues: the legitimate place of the state in the production of security
- 8 From security to health
- 9 Research and innovation in the field of security: a nodal governance view
- Conclusion: The future of democracy
- References
- Index
Summary
Introduction
Security matters to health. Crime victimization causes death, injury and illness. Injury or death is an occupational hazard for police. The criminal justice system causes injury and illness in the course of attempting to punish and deter crime. Policing policies and practices can have a significant impact on the ability of other public and private agencies to implement health interventions successfully. Police themselves routinely deal with people who have serious health needs, and even on occasion are the primary agents implementing health interventions. The health consequences of law enforcement are far from trivial, making it important for health to be integrated as a matter of concern into criminological research and law enforcement practice. The link between health and policing, and the significance of health outcomes, should be more fully accepted in criminology. Likewise, the governance of security is an important matter for public health research and practice.
If health outcomes are seen as an important product of security arrangements, conventional policing can be reconfigured to reduce negative health consequences and promote positive ones. There are, however, limits to the extent that state-centred policing can be expected to change. The theory of nodal governance and the programmatic work of innovators in the governance of security movement offer useful insights into the co-ordination of health and security outside the state-centred policing framework.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Democracy, Society and the Governance of Security , pp. 196 - 216Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2006
- 19
- Cited by