Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface
- Part I Theory
- Part II Observations
- 5 Foundations of supernova cosmology
- 6 Dark energy and supernovae
- 7 The future of supernova cosmology
- 8 The space advantage for measuring dark energy with Type Ia supernovae
- 9 Baryon acoustic oscillations
- 10 Weak gravitational lensing, dark energy and modified gravity
- Index
- References
5 - Foundations of supernova cosmology
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2014
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface
- Part I Theory
- Part II Observations
- 5 Foundations of supernova cosmology
- 6 Dark energy and supernovae
- 7 The future of supernova cosmology
- 8 The space advantage for measuring dark energy with Type Ia supernovae
- 9 Baryon acoustic oscillations
- 10 Weak gravitational lensing, dark energy and modified gravity
- Index
- References
Summary
Supernovae and the discovery of the expanding universe
Supernovae have been firmly woven into the fabric of cosmology from the very beginning of modern understanding of the expanding, and now accelerating universe. Today's evidence for cosmic acceleration is just the perfection of a long quest that goes right back to the foundations of cosmology. In the legendary Curtis-Shapley debate on the nature of the nebulae, the bright novae that had been observed in nebulae suggested to Shapley (1921) (see Trimble, 1995) that the systems containing them must be nearby. Otherwise, he reasoned, they would have unheard-of luminosities, corresponding to M = −16 or brighter. Curtis (1921) countered, concluding, “the dispersion of the novae in spirals and in our galaxy may reach ten magnitudes … a division into two classes is not impossible.” Curtis missed the opportunity to name the supernovae, but he saw that they must exist if the galaxies are distant. Once the distances to the nearby galaxies were firmly established by the observation of Cepheid variables (Hubble, 1925), the separation of ordinary novae and their extraordinary, and much more luminous super cousins, became clear.
A physical explanation for the supernovae was attempted by Baade and Zwicky (1934). Their speculation that supernova energy comes from the collapse to a neutron star is often cited, and it is a prescient suggestion for the fate of massive stars, but not the correct explanation for the supernovae that Zwicky and Baade studied systematically in the 1930s.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Dark EnergyObservational and Theoretical Approaches, pp. 151 - 176Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2010
References
- 3
- Cited by