Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T20:00:10.883Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

19 - Value Transmission and Zeitgeist Revisited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
Klaus Boehnke ,
Andreas Hadjar  and
Dirk Baier
Edited by
Ute Schönpflug
Ute Schönpflug
Affiliation:
Freie Universität Berlin
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION: ZEITGEIST AND INTRAFAMILIAL TRANSMISSION PROCESSES

In a family, similarity between parent and offspring values can originate from three sources: (1) direct and mediated value-transmission effects of parents' values on the values of their children; (2) processes of adaptation of the parents to values and attitudes of their children; and (3) parents and children being affected similarly by the context within which they live (Boehnke, 2001; Knafo, 2003; Kohn, 1983; Urban & Singelmann, 1998). Intrafamilial processes of value transmission do not take place in an isolated family-only environment but rather in a specific societal context. All members of the family are in permanent contact with this context through peers, mass media, schooling, or work groups. As such, context effects can proceed from the educational system, the socioeconomic situation, or the societal value climate.

There are a growing number of studies dealing with context effects on intergenerational transmission. Urban and Singelmann (1998) define the context implicitly as the amount of variance of the child's values that is not explained by the father's and the mother's values. Other studies deal with context more explicitly. Knafo (2003) analyzes how parents' attitudes – in interplay with the school environment – influence children's values. His findings suggest that a stronger value transmission pertains in high-fit contexts – that is, when parents share the values of the children's school environment. Knafo explains this as follows: A high fit between the educational ideology of parents and the school environment leads to less value conflict within the family.

Type
Chapter
Information
Cultural Transmission
Psychological, Developmental, Social, and Methodological Aspects
 , pp. 441 - 459
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Science Editions.Google Scholar
,Akademie der pädagogischen Wissenschaften, Abt. Bildungssoziologie (1989). Berufslaufbahnen, Lebenspläne und Wertorientierungen [Professional careers, life plans, and value orientations]. Berlin: Akademie der Pädagogischen Wissenschaften der DDR, Research Report.Google Scholar
Baier, D., & Hadjar, A. (2004). Wie wird Leistungsorientierung von den Eltern auf die Kinder übertragen? Ergebnisse einer Längsschnittstudie [How is achievement orientation transmitted from parents to children? Results of a panel study]. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung, 15, 156–177.Google Scholar
Boehnke, K. (1988). Prosoziale Motivation, Selbstkonzept und politische Orientierung: Entwicklungsbedingungen und Veränderungen im Jugendalter [Prosocial motivation, self-concept, and political orientation: Development and change in adolescence]. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Google Scholar
Boehnke, K. (2001). Parent–offspring value transmission in a societal context: Suggestions for a utopian research design – with empirical underpinnings. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 241–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehnke, K. (2004). Do our children become as we are? Intergenerational value transmission and societal value change – two unlinked concepts in social research. In Hardt, F. (Ed.), Mapping the world (pp. 99–118). Tübingen: Francke.Google Scholar
Boehnke, K., & Hadjar, A. (2004). Authoritarianism. In Spielberger, C. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Applied Psychology (pp. 251–255). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehnke, K., Ittel, A., & Baier, D. (2002). Value transmission and zeitgeist: An under-researched relationship. Sociale Wetenschappen, 45, 28–43.Google Scholar
Boehnke, K., Merkens, H., & Claßen, G. (1998). Dominanzideologie, Geschlechtsrollen und Delinquenz bei Jugendlichen in Toronto und Berlin [Dominance ideologies, gender roles, and delinquency among adolescents in Toronto and Berlin]. Chemnitz/Berlin: Proposal to the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.Google Scholar
Christie, R., & Geis, F. L. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodnow, J. J. (1997). Parenting and the “transmission” and “internalization” of values: From social-cultural perspectives to within-family analyses. In Grusec, J. E. & Kuczynski, L. (Eds.), Handbook of parenting and the transmission of values (pp. 333–361). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Grusec, J. E., & Goodnow, J. J. (1994). Impact of parental discipline methods on the child's internalization of values: A reconceptualization of current points of view. Developmental Psychology, 30, 4–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadjar, A. (2004). Ellenbogenmentalität und Fremdenfeindlichkeit bei Jugendlichen: Die Rolle des Hierarchischen Selbstinteresses [Elbow mentality and xenophobia among adolescents: The role of hierarchic self-interest]. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadjar, A., & Baier, D. (2003). Familiale Vererbung von Dominanzideologien in verschiedenen sozio-ökonomischen Kontexten [Familial heredity of dominance ideologies in different socioeconomic contexts]. Zeitschrift für Politische Psychologie, 10, 303–320.Google Scholar
Hadjar, A., Baier, D., & Boehnke, K. (2003). Geschlechtsspezifische Jugenddelinquenz: Eine Beurteilung der Power-Control Theory [Gender-specific juvenile delinquency: An evaluation of power-control theory]. In Mansel, J., Griese, H., & Scherr, A. (Eds.), Theoriedefizite der Jugendforschung (pp. 174–193). Weinheim: Juventa.Google Scholar
Hagan, J., Gillis, A. R., & Simpson, J. (1979). The sexual stratification of social control: A gender-based perspective on crime and delinquency. British Journal of Sociology, 30, 25–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hagan, J., Hefler, G., Claßen, G., Boehnke, K., & Merkens, H. (1998). Subterranean sources of subcultural delinquency beyond the American dream. Criminology, 36, 309–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagan, J., Rippl, S., Boehnke, K., & Merkens, H. (1999). Interest in evil: Hierarchic self-interest and right-wing extremism among East and West German youth. Social Science Research, 28, 162–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henning, H. J., & Six, B. (1977). Konstruktion einer Machiavellismus-Skala [Construction of a Machiavellism scale]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 8, 185–198.Google Scholar
Hirsch, F. (1977). Social limits to growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. (1977). The silent revolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jerusalem, M. (1984). Selbstbezogene Kognitionen in schulischen Bezugsgruppen [Self-related cognitions in school-based peer groups]. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin.Google Scholar
Kagitcibasi, C. (1967). Social norms and authoritarianism: A comparison of Turkish and American adolescents. Berkeley: University of California, doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Knafo, A. (2003). Contexts, relationship quality, and family value socialization: The case of parent–school ideological fit in Israel. Personal Relationships, 10, 371–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohn, M. L. (1983). On the transmission of values in the family: A preliminary formulation. Research in Sociology of Education and Socialization, 4, 3–12.Google Scholar
Kohn, M. L., Slomczynski, K. M., & Schoenbach, C. (1986). Social stratification and the transmission of values in the family: A cross-national assessment. Sociological Forum, 1, 73–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Küpper, B., & Heitmeyer, W. (2004). Feindselige Frauen: Zwischen Angst, Zugehörigkeit und Durchsetzungsideologie [Hostile women: Between anxiety, affiliation, and dominance ideology]. In Heitmeyer, W. (Ed.), Deutsche Zustände, Folge 3 (pp. 108–128). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Lederer, G. (1983). Jugend und Autorität [Youth and authority]. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, N. (1984/1532). The prince (Il principe). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
MacPherson, C. B. (1962). The political theory of possessive individualism: From Hobbes to Locke. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sagy, S., & Antonovsky, A. (1992). The family sense of coherence and the retirement transition. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 983–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmel, G. (1978/1900). The Philosophy of Money. London/Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. London: W. Strahan and T. Cadell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Troll, L., & Bengtson, V. (1979). Generations and the family. In Burr, W. R., Hill, R., Nye, F. I., & Reiss, I. L. (Eds.), Contemporary theories about the family, Vol. 1 (pp. 127–161). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Urban, D., & Singelmann, J. (1998). Eltern-Kind-Transmissionen von ausländer-ablehnenden Einstellungen: Eine regionale Längsschnitt-Studie zur intra- und intergenerativen Herausbildung eines sozialen Orientierungsmusters [Parent–child transmission of xenophobic attitudes: A regional panel study on genesis of social orientation patterns within and across generations]. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 27, 276–296.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1930). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. London: Unwin/Hyman.Google Scholar
Wegener, B. (1988). Kritik des Prestiges [Critique of prestige]. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zetterberg, H. L. (1992). The sociology of values: The Swedish value space. Paper presented at the 87th Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, August 20–24, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
Zetterberg, H. L. (1997). The study of values. In Swedberg, R. & Uddhammar, E. (Eds.), Sociological endeavor: Selected writings (pp. 191–219). Stockholm: City University Press.Google Scholar
Zetterberg, H. L. (1998). Cultural values in market and opinion research. In Mc-Donald, C. & Vangelder, P. (Eds.), Handbook of marketing and opinion research (pp. 995–1013). Amsterdam: ESOMAR.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×