Badar, M. E., The Concept of Mens Rea in International Criminal Law: The Case for a Unified Approach (Oxford: Hart, 2013).Google Scholar

Boister, N. and Cryer, R., The Tokyo International Tribunal: A Reappraisal (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Fowler, H. W., A Dictionary of Modern English Language (Oxford University Press, 1950).Google Scholar

Heller, K. J., The Nuremberg Military Tribunals and the Origins of International Criminal Law (Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

McDougall, C., The Crime of Aggression under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Barriga, S., ‘Against the Odds: The Results of the Special Working Group on the Crime of Aggression’, in Barriga, S., Danspeckgruber, W. and Wenaweser, C. (eds.), The Princeton Process on the Crime of Aggression: Materials of the Special Working Group on the Crime of Aggression, 2003–2009 (Liechtenstein Institute on Self-Determination at Princeton University, 2009) 1–20.Google Scholar

Barriga, S., ‘Negotiating the Amendments on the Crime of Aggression’, in Barriga, S. and Kreß, C. (eds.), The Travaux Préparatoires of the Crime of Aggression (Cambridge University Press, 2012), 3–57.Google Scholar

Gosnell, C., ‘Damned if You Don’t: Liability for Omissions in International Criminal Law’, in Schabas, W. A., McDermott, Y. and Hayes, N. (eds.), The Ashgate Research Companion to International Criminal Law: Critical Perspectives (Farnham: Ashgate, 2013), 101–31.Google Scholar

Shukri, M. A., ‘Individual Responsibility for the Crime of Aggression’, in Bellelli, R. (ed.), International Criminal Justice: Law and Practice from the Rome Statute to its Review (Farnham: Ashgate, 2010), 519–45.Google Scholar

Clark, R. S., ‘Nuremberg and the Crime against Peace’, Washington University Global Studies Law Review, 6 (2007), 527–55.Google Scholar

Clark, R. S., ‘Drafting a General Part to a Penal Code: Some Thoughts Inspired by the Negotiations on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and by the Court’s First Substantive Law Discussion in the Lubanga Dyilo Confirmation Proceedings’, Criminal Law Forum, 19 (2008), 519–52.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Lubanga Dyilo, Judgment Pursuant to Article 74 of the Statute, ICC-01/04-01/06-2842, 14 March 2012.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Ngudjolo Chui, Judgment Pursuant to Article 74 of the Statute, ICC-01/04/12, 18 December 2012.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, on the Appeals of the Prosecutor and Mr Thomas Lubanga Dyilo Against the ‘Decision on Sentence Pursuant to Article 76 of the Statute’, No. ICC-01/04-01/06 A 4 A 6, Appeals Chamber, 1 December 2014.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, Judgment on the Appeal of Mr Thomas Lubanga Dyilo against his conviction, No. ICC-01/04-01/06 A 5, Appeals Chamber, 1 December 2014.Google Scholar

Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (adopted 9 December 1948, entered into force 12 January 1951), 78 UNTS 277.Google Scholar

ILC, ‘Draft Articles on the Draft Code of Crimes against the Peace and Security of Mankind’, Yb ILC (1988), vol. II(2), 55.Google Scholar

ILC, ‘Summary Records of the Meetings of the Forty-Eighth Session, 6 May–26 July 1996’, UN Doc. A/CN.4/SER.A/1996, Yb ILC (1996), vol. I, 1.Google Scholar

‘Report by Robert H. Jackson’, United States Representative to the International Conference on Military Trials, London 1945, available at: www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/jackson-rpt-military-trials.pdf.Google Scholar