Bačić, F. and Pavlović, S., Komentar kaznenog zakona (Zagreb: Organizator, 2004).Google Scholar

Bačić, F. and Šeparović, Z., Krivično pravo. Posebni dio (Zagreb: Narodne novine, 1989).Google Scholar

Degan, V-Đ. and Pavišić, B., Međunarodno kazneno pravo (Rijeka: Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Rijeci, 2005).Google Scholar

Horvatić, Ž., Novo hrvatsko kazneno pravo (Zagreb: Organizator, 1997).Google Scholar

Munivrana Vajda, M., Univerzalno načelo kao kriterij prostornog važenja kaznenog zakona (Zagreb: Hrvatsko udruženje za kaznene znanosti i praksu, MUP RH, Policijska akademija, 2007).Google Scholar

Novoselec, P., Opći dio kaznenog prava (Zagreb: Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu, 2009).Google Scholar

Pavišić, B. et al., Komentar kaznenog zakona (Zagreb: Narodne novine, 2007).Google Scholar

Srzentić, N. (ed.), Komentar Krivičnog zakona SFRJ (Beograd: Suvremena Administracija, 1982).Google Scholar

Werle, G., Principles of International Criminal Law (The Hague: T. M. C. Asser, 2009).Google Scholar

Reisinger Coracini, A., ‘Defining the Crime of Aggression for the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court’, in Stahn, C. and van den Herik, L. (eds.), Future Perspectives on International Criminal Justice (The Hague: T. M. C. Asser, 2010), 425–49.Google Scholar

Reisinger Coracini, A., ‘Evaluating Domestic Legislation on the Customary Crime of Aggression under the Rome Statute’s Complementarity Regime’, in Stahn, C. and Sluiter, G. (eds.), The Emerging Practice of the International Criminal Court (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2009), 725–54.Google Scholar

Turković, K., ‘Kaznena djela protiv međunarodnog prava’, in Horvatić, Z. et al. (eds.), Kazneno pravo, Posebni dio (Zagreb: Masmedia, 1999), 150–86.Google Scholar

Ambos, K., ‘The Crime of Aggression after Kampala’, German Yearbook of International Law, 53 (2010), 463–509.Google Scholar

Degan, V-Đ., ‘Odgovornost za zločin agresije u svim njezinim vidovima’, Rad HAZU, 48 (2011), 233–89.Google Scholar

Heller, K. J., ‘Retreat from Nuremberg: The Leadership Requirement in the Crime of Aggression’, European Journal of International Law, 18 (2007), 477–521.Google Scholar

Kreß, C. and von Holtzendorff, L., ‘The Kampala Compromise on the Crime of Aggression’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 8 (2010), 1179–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Munivrana Vajda, M., ‘Types of Culpability and the Permanent International Criminal Court’ (in Croatian), Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu, 18 (2011), 3–29.Google Scholar

Van Schaack, B., ‘Par in Parem Imperium Non Habet. Complementarity and the Crime of Aggression’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10 (2012), 133–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Criminal Code of the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, Official Gazette SFRJ, Nos. 4/77, 13/85, 36/77, 26/86, 74/87, 57/89 i 3/90.Google Scholar

Official Gazette of the Republic of Croatia (Narodne novine), Nos. 31/93, 110/97, 27/98, 50/00, 129/00, 51/01, 111/03, 190/03, 105/04, 84/05, 71/06, 110/07, 152/08, 57/11, 125/11, 56/90, 135/97, 113/00, 28/01, 76/10, 175/03, 29/04-corr., 55/11, 102/2000 and 80/96.Google Scholar

UN General Assembly, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 16 December 1996, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 999, 171.Google Scholar

Kühl, K., Lackner/Kühl Strafgesetzbuch Kommentar, 28th edn (Munich: Beck, 2014).Google Scholar

Maurach, R., Schroeder, F. C. and Maiwald, M., Strafrecht Besonderer Teil, Teilband 2, 9th edn (Heidelberg: C. H. Müller, 2005).Google Scholar

Müller, F., Die Pönalisierung des Angriffskrieges im Grundgesetz und Strafgesetzbuch der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Berlin: Luchterhand, 1970).Google Scholar

Steinhausen, M., Der Straftatbestand des Friedensverrats (§ 80 StGB) und die Erfordernisse des Bestimmungsgrundsatzes (Artikel 103 Abs. 2 GG) (Cologne: Wasmund-Bothmann, 1969).Google Scholar

United Nations, Historical Review of Developments Relating to Aggression (New York: United Nations, 2003).Google Scholar

Ambos, K., ‘Strafrecht und Krieg: strafbare Beteiligung der Bundesregierung am Irak-Krieg?’, in Arnold, J. et al. (eds.), Menschengerechtes Strafrecht-Festschrift für Albin Eser (Munich: Beck, 2005), 671–90.Google Scholar

Classen, C. D., ‘§ 80’, in Joecks, W. and Miebach, K. (eds.), Münchener Kommentar zum StGB, vol. III (8 vols., Munich: Beck, 2012).Google Scholar

Fischer, T., ‘§ 80’, in Fischer, T. (ed.), Strafgesetzbuch und Nebengebiete, 58th edn (Munich: Beck, 2011).Google Scholar

Gallas, W., ‘Abstrakte und konkrete Gefährdung’, in Lüttger, H., Blei, H. and Hanau, P. (eds.), Festschrift für Ernst Heinitz (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1972), 171–84.Google Scholar

Geppert, K., ‘Strafrechtliche Gedanken zum Kosovo-Krieg’, in Graul, E. and Wolf, G. (eds.), Gedächtnisschrift für Meurer (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2002), 315–31.Google Scholar

Hobe, S., ‘Artikel 26’, in Friauf, K. H. and Höfling, W. (eds.), Berliner Kommentar zum Grundgesetz, vol. II (2 vols., Berlin: Schmidt, 2000).Google Scholar

Herdegen, M., ‘Artikel 26’, in Maunz, T. and Dürig, G. (eds.), Grundgesetz Kommentar, 66th edn, vol. 4 (8 vols., Munich: Beck, 2012).Google Scholar

Klug, U., ‘Der neue Straftatbestand des Friedensverrats’, in Baumann, J. (ed.), Misslingt die Strafrechtsreform? (Berlin: Luchterhand, 1969), 162–70.Google Scholar

Kühl, K., ‘§ 80’, in Lackner, K. and Kühl, K. (eds.) Strafgesetzbuch Kommentar, 28th edn (Munich: Beck, 2014).Google Scholar

Laufhütte, H. W., ‘§ 80’, in Laufhütte, H. W., Rissing-van Saan, R. and Tiedemann, K. (eds.), Strafgesetzbuch, Leipziger Kommentar, 12th edn, vol. IV (14 vols., Berlin: de Gruyter, 2007).Google Scholar

Paeffgen, H. U., ‘§ 80’, in Kindhäuser, U., Neumann, U. and Paeffgen, H. U. (eds.), Strafgesetzbuch, 3rd edn, vol. I (2 vols., Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2010).Google Scholar

Sonnen, B. R., ‘§ 80’, in Wassermann, R. (ed.), Alternativ-Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch, vol. III (3 vols., Neuwied: Luchterhand, 1986).Google Scholar

Sternberg-Lieben, D., ‘§ 80’, in Schönke, A., Schröder, H., Leckner, T. and Eser, A. (eds.), Strafgesetzbuch Kommentar, 28th edn (Munich: Beck, 2010).Google Scholar

Busse, C., ‘Der Kosovo-Krieg vor deutschen Strafgerichten’, NStZ, 20 (2000), 631–35.Google Scholar

Kreß, C., ‘Strafrecht und Angriffskrieg im Licht des “Falles Irak”’, ZStW, 115 (2003), 294–351.Google Scholar

Kreß, C., ‘The German Chief Federal Prosecutor’s Decision Not to Investigate the Alleged Crime of Preparing Aggression against Iraq’, J Int’l Crim Justice, 2 (2004), 245–64.Google Scholar

Schroeder, F. C., ‘Der Schutz des äußeren Friedens im Strafrecht’, JZ, 24 (1969), 41–48.Google Scholar

Wirth, S., ‘Germany’s New International Crimes Code: Bringing a Case to Court’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 1 (2003), 151–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zimmermann, A. and Henn, E. V., ‘Das Aggressionsverbrechen und das deutsche Strafrecht’, ZRP, 46 (2013), 240–43.Google Scholar

Bundestag-Drucksachen, V/2860, 2 (Bundestag document).Google Scholar

Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG), Judgment, No. 2 WD 12/04, 21. 6. 2005, NJW, 59 (2006), 77.Google Scholar

German Chief Federal Prosecutor, Press release No. 10 of 22 April 1999, available at: www.glasnost.de/kosovo/urteilstrafanz.html.Google Scholar

German Chief Federal Prosecutor, Statement, 26 January 2006, available at: www.koop-frieden.de/presse/generalbundesanwalt2006.html.Google Scholar

Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland (the German Constitution), Bundesgesetzblatt (BGBl.) Teil III, Gliederungsnummer 100-1, available at: www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bundesrecht/gg/gesamt.pdf.Google Scholar

Press statement of the German Chief Federal Prosecutor, JZ, 58 (2003), 908–11.Google Scholar

Regional Court of Cologne (Landgericht Köln), Judgment, No. 31-18/80, 9.7.1980, Public Prosecutor’s Office of Cologne (StA Köln), No. 120 Js 32/79, NStZ, 1 (1981), 261.Google Scholar

Strafgesetzbuch (German Criminal Code) of 13 November 1998 (BGBl. I, 3322), as last amended on 23 April 2014 (BGBl. I, 410), available at: www.gesetze-im-intnet.de/bundesrecht/stgb/gesamt.pdf.Google Scholar

Cassese, A., International Criminal Law, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Cryer, R., Friman, H., Robinson, D. and Wilmshurst, E., An Introduction to International Criminal Law and Procedure, 2nd edn (Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Francioni, F. and Ronzitti, N., War by Contract: Human Rights, Humanitarian Law, and Private Contractors (Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Mälksoo, L., Illegal Annexation and State Continuity: The Case of the Incorporation of the Baltic States by the USSR (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2003).Google Scholar

Meissner, B., Die Sowjetunion, die Baltischen Staaten und das Völkerrecht (Cologne: Verlag für Politik und Wirtschaft, 1956).Google Scholar

Stewart, J. G., Corporate War Crimes: Prosecuting Pillage of Natural Resources, 2nd edn (New York: Open Society Foundations, 2011).Google Scholar

Werle, G., Principles of International Criminal Law, 2nd edn (The Hague: T. M. C. Asser, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glaser, S., ‘Quelques remarques sur la définition de l’agression en droit International Penal’, in Hohenleitner, S. (ed.), Festschrift für Theodor Rittler (Aalen: Scientia, 1957), 388–93.Google Scholar

Merusk, K. et al., ‘§ 3’, in Madise, Ü. (ed.), Eesti Vabariigi Põhiseadus. Kommenteeritud Väljaanne, 2. Trükk (Tallinn: Juura, 2008), 54–65.Google Scholar

Tehver, J., ‘§ 91’, in Sootak, J. and Pikamäe, P. (eds.), Karistusseadustik. Kommenteeritud Väljaanne, 3. Trükk (Tallinn: Juura, 2009), 267–68.Google Scholar

Tehver, J., ‘§ 91’, in Sootak, J. and Pikamäe, P. (eds.), Karistusseadustik. Kommenteeritud Väljaanne, 4. täiendatud ja ümbertöötatud väljaanne (Tallinn: Juura, 2015), 330–32.Google Scholar

Cassese, A., ‘Balancing the Prosecution of Crimes against Humanity and Non-Retroactivity of Criminal Law: The Kolk and Kislyiy v Estonia Case before the ECHR’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 4 (2006), 410–18.Google Scholar

Heller, K. J., ‘Retreat from Nuremberg: The Leadership Requirement in the Crime of Aggression’, European Journal of International Law, 18 (2007), 477–97.Google Scholar

Kreß, C., ‘Time for Decision: Some Thoughts on the Immediate Future of the Crime of Aggression’, European Journal of International Law, 20 (2009), 1129–46.Google Scholar

Kreß, C., ‘The German Prosecutor’s Decision’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 2 (2004), 245–64.Google Scholar

Kreß, C. and von Holtzendorff, L., ‘Kampala Compromise on the Crime of Aggression’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 8 (2010), 1179–217.Google Scholar

Lehnhardt, C., ‘Individual Liability of Private Military Personnel under International Criminal Law’, European Journal of International Law, 19 (2008), 1015–34.Google Scholar

Mälksoo, L., ‘Kononov v. Latvia’, American Journal of International Law, 105 (2011), 101–8.Google Scholar

Milanovic, M., ‘Aggression and Legality Custom in Kampala’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10 (2012), 165–87.Google Scholar

Sellars, K., ‘Delegitimizing Aggression: First Steps and False Starts after the First World War’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10 (2012), 7–40.Google Scholar

Kolk and Kislyiy v. Estonia, Decision on Admissibility, ECtHR, Nos. 23052/04 and 24018/04, 17 January 2006, available at: hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001–72404, last accessed 20 October 2014.Google Scholar

Penart v. Estonia, Decision on Admissibility, ECtHR, No. 14685/04, 24 January 2006, available at: hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001–72685, last accessed 20 October 2014.Google Scholar

United States of America v. von Leeb et al. (the High Command case), in Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals Under Control Council Law No. 10, vol. XI (15 vols., Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1951).Google Scholar

United States of America v. Ernst von Weizsäcker et al. (the Ministries case), in Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals Under Control Council Law No. 10, vol. XIV (15 vols., Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office).Google Scholar

Amnesty International, ‘The Costs of Outsourcing War’, available at: www.amnestyusa.org/our-work/issues/business-and-human-rights/private-military-and-security-companies, last accessed 3 October 2015.Google Scholar

Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court of Estonia, Judgment, No. 3-1-1-140-03, 18 December 2003, RT III 2004, 2, 23.Google Scholar

Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court of Estonia, Judgment, No. 3-1-1-84-09, 18 November 2009, RT III 2009, 53, 391.Google Scholar

Constitutional Review Chamber of the Supreme Court of Estonia, Judgment, No. III-4/A-5/94, 30 September 1994, translation into English available at: www.nc.ee/?id=482, last accessed 20 October 2014.Google Scholar

Constitutional Review Chamber of the Supreme Court of Estonia, Judgment, No. III-4/A-10/94, 21 December 1994, translation into English available at: www.nc.ee/?id=477, last accessed 20 October 2014.Google Scholar

Convention Defining Aggression between Afghanistan, Estonia, Latvia, Persia, Poland, Roumania, Turkey and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (signed 3 July 1933), 147 LNTS 67.Google Scholar

Convention Defining Aggression between Roumania, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, Czechoslovakia, Turkey and Yugoslavia (signed 4 July 1933), 148 LNTS 211.Google Scholar

Convention Defining Aggression between the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and Lithuania (signed 5 July 1933), 148 LNTS 79.Google Scholar

Eelnõu SE 119. Seletuskiri karistusseadustiku eelnõu juurde (Explanatory Memorandum to the draft of the Penal Code (SE 119)).Google Scholar

Eelnõu SE 554. Seletuskiri karistusseadustiku ja sellega seonduvalt teiste seaduste muutmise seaduse eelnõu juurde (Explanatory Memorandum to the draft law amending the Penal Code and other related legal acts (SE 554)), available (only in Estonian) at: www.riigikogu.ee/tegevus/eelnoud/eelnou/78433b29-8b2f-4281-a582-0efb9631e2ad, last accessed 3 October 2015.Google Scholar

Eestis inimsusevastaseid kuritegusid või sõjakuritegusid toimepannud isikute kriminaalvastutuse seadus, RT I 1994, 83, 1447 (Act on Criminal Liability of Persons who have committed War Crimes or Crimes against Humanity in Estonia).Google Scholar

Germany, Code of Criminal Procedure in the version published on 7 April 1987 (Federal Law Gazette, Part I, 1074, 1319), as most recently amended by article 2 of the Act of 22 December 2010 (Federal Law Gazette, Part I, 2300), available at: www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_stpo/englisch_stpo.html#p1230, last accessed 20 October 2014.Google Scholar

ILC, ‘Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of its Fifty-Third Session, 23 April–1 June and 2 July–10 August 2001’, UN Doc. A/56/10, Yb ILC (2001), vol. II(2), 1.Google Scholar

Judgment of the International Military Tribunal for the Trial of German Major War Criminals, 30 September–1 October 1946, vol. I, official text in the English language. Published at Nuremberg, Germany, 1947.Google Scholar

Karistusseadustiku ja sellega seonduvalt teiste seaduste muutmise seadus. 16.07.2013 Eelnõu (Draft law for amending the Penal Code and related acts. 16.07.2013). The file of the draft law is available (only in Estonian) at: http://eelnoud.valitsus.ee, last accessed 3 October 2015.Google Scholar

Karistusseadustiku ja sellega seonduvalt teiste seaduste muutmise seadus. 20.11.2013 Eelnõu (Draft law for amending the Penal Code and related acts. 20.11.2013). The file of the draft law is available (only in Estonian) at: http://eelnoud.valitsus.ee, last accessed 3 October 2015.Google Scholar

Kooskõlastuste tabel (overview of the consultation process). The file of the overview is available (only in Estonian) at: http://eelnoud.valitsus.ee, last accessed 3 October 2015.Google Scholar

Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction, available at: lapa.princeton.edu/hosteddocs/unive_jur.pdf, last accessed 20 October 2014.Google Scholar

Treaty of Non-Aggression and Peaceful Settlement of Disputes between the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and Estonia (signed 4 May 1932), 131 LNTS 297.Google Scholar

Trial of the Major War Criminals before the International Military Tribunal. Nuremberg, 14 November 1945–1 October 1946, vol. II (42 vols., Nuremberg, 1947).Google Scholar

Gromov, N. A. (ed.), The Item-by-item Commentary to the Criminal Code of Russian Federation (Moscow: Gross-Media, 2008) (Постатейный комментарий к Уголовному кодексу Российской Федерации, под ред. Н.А. Громова (Москва: Гросс-Медиа, 2008)).Google Scholar

Inogamova-Khegai, L. V., Komissarov, V. S. and Rarog, A. I. (eds.), The Russian Criminal Law: Textbook. General Part, 3rd edn, vol. I (2 vols., Moscow: Prospekt, 2011) (Российское уголовное право: учебник: в 2-х т. Т. 1.: Общая часть / под ред. Л.В. Иногамовой-Хегай, В.С. Комиссарова, А.И. Рарога. 3-е изд., перераб. и доп. (М.: Проспект, 2011)).Google Scholar

Kibalnik, A. G., Solomonenko, I. G. and Shibkov, O. N., Principles and Norms of International Law as the Sources of Criminal Law (Stavropol: Stavropolservisshkola, 2010) (А. Г.Кибальник, И.Г.Соломоненко, О. Н. Шибков, Принципы и нормы международного права как источники уголовного права (Ставрополь: Ставропольсервисшкола, 2000)).Google Scholar

Kudryavtsev, V. N. (ed.), International Criminal Law (Moscow: Science, 1999) (В. Н. Кудрявцев (ред.) Международное уголовное право (Москва: Наука, 1999)).Google Scholar

Lebedev, V. M. (ed.), Commentary to the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, 12th edn (Moscow: Yurait, 2012) (Комментарий к Уголовному кодексу Российской Федерации, отв. ред. В.М. Лебедев, 12-е изд. (Москва: Юрайт, 2012)).Google Scholar

Naumov, A. V. (ed.), Commentary to the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, 2nd edn (Moscow: Publishing Group ‘Jurist’, 2000) (Комментарий к Уголовному кодексу Российской Федерации (Под ред. А. В. Наумова); Институт государства и права РАН, 2-е изд., перераб. и доп. (Москва: Издательская группа “Юристъ”, ИНФРА-М, 2000)).Google Scholar

Rarog, A. I. (ed.), Criminal Law of Russia, General and Special Parts. Textbook, 3rd edn (Moscow: Prospekt, 2014) (Уголовное право России. Части общая и Особенная. Учебник /под.ред. А.И.Рарога, 3-е изд., перераб. и доп. (Москва:Проспект, 2014)).Google Scholar

Razumov, S. A. (under the leadership of), Commentary to the Criminal Code, available at: www.labex.ru/page/kom_uk_353.html (Коллектив под руководством С.А.Разумова. Комментарий к Уголовному Кодексу РФ. Комментарий к статье 353 УК РФ).Google Scholar

Skuratov, Y. I. and Lebedev, V. M. (eds.), Commentary to the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, 3rd edn (Moscow: Norma, 1999) (Комментарий к Уголовному кодексу Российской Федерации, отв. ред. Ю.И. Скуратов, В. М. Лебедев, 3-е изд. (Москва: Норма, 1999)).Google Scholar

Trainin, A. N., The Defence of Peace and the Fight against Crimes against Humanity (Moscow, Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 1956) (А. Н.Трайнин, Защита мира и борьба с преступлениями против человечества (Москва: Издательство Академии наук СССР, 1956)).Google Scholar

Zhalinskiy, A. E. (ed.), Criminal Law: Textbook. General Part, vol. I (3 vols., Moscow: Publishing House ‘Gorodets’, 2011) (Уголовное право: учебник: в 3-х т. Т. 1.: Общая часть /под ред.А.В. Жалинского (Москва: Издательский Дом ‘Городец’, 2011)).Google Scholar

Konyakhin, V. P., ‘International Treaty as a Source of the Russian Criminal’, in Criminal Law in the XXI Century, Proceedings of International Scientific Conference at the Law Faculty Moscow State University, 31 May–1 June 2001 (Moscow: Prospekt, 2002), 152–59 (В.П. Коняхин Международный договор как источник российского уголовного права в: Уголовное право в XXI веке. Материалы Международной научной конференции, проходившей на юридическом факультете МГУ 31 мая – 1 июня 2001 года (Москва: Проспект 2002), c.c.152–59).Google Scholar

Opalich, E. V. and Churavleva, E. N., ‘The Problems of the Criminal Law Definition “Aggression”’, in Zvyagin, S. P. (ed.), The Problems of Law and Application of the Law. The Collection of Scientific Articles (Kemerovo: ‘KRIRPO’, 2005), 14–19 (Е. Н. Журавлева, Е. В. Опалич, ‘Проблемы уголовно-правового понятия “агрессия”’ в С. П. Звягин (Отв. ред.), Проблемы права и правоприменения. Сборник научных статей (Кемерово: ГОУ‘КРИРПО’, 2005), с.с.14–19).Google Scholar

Glotova, S. V., ‘The Russian Federation and the International Criminal Court’, Herald of the Russian University of People’s Friendship, 4 (2006) 57–63 (С. В. Глотова, ‘Российская Федерация и Международный уголовный суд’, Вестник Российского Университета дружбы народов, 4 (2006), 57–63).Google Scholar

Mavlonov, A. and Mesyaev, A., ‘The Issue of Implementation of the Norm of the International Criminal Law in the Russian Legislation’, State and Law, 4 (1998), 104–6 (А. А. Мавлонов, А. Б. Мезяев, ‘Проблемы имплементации норм международного уголовного права в российском уголовном законодательстве’, Государство и право, 4 (1998), 104–6).Google Scholar

Sayapin, S., ‘The Development of the Definition of the Crime of Aggression in International and National Criminal Law’, Almanach International Law, 2 (2010), 294–316 (C.Саяпин, ‘Развитие определения преступления агрессии в международном и национальном уголовном праве’, Альманах международного права, 2 (2010), 294–316).Google Scholar

The Constitution of the Russian Federation (adopted on 12 December 1993; with amendments made on 30 December 2008 N 6-FKZ, N 7-FKZ, on 5 February 2014 N 2-FKZ, and on 21 July 2014 N 11-FKZ) (“Конституция Российской Федерации” (Принята всенародным голосованием 12 December 1993; с учетом попрaвок, внесенных Законами РФ о попрaвкax к Kонститyции РФ от 30 December 2008 N 6-ФKЗ, от 30 December 2008 N 7-ФKЗ, от 5 February 2014 N 2- ФKЗ, от 21 July 2014 N 11-ФKЗ), available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_28399/).Google Scholar

Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, Federal Law No. 63-FZ on 13 June 1996 (with amendments on 23 June 2016) (“Уголовный кодекс Российской Федерации” No. 63-ФЗ от 13 June 1996 (ред. 3 July 2016), available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_docs_LAW_10699/.Google Scholar

Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, Federal Law No. 174-FZ on 18 December 2001 (with amendments on 13 July 2015) (УГолоВНо-ПроЦессуалЬНЫЙ ΚоДеΚс РоссИЙсΚоЙ ФеДераЦИИ No. 174-ФЗ оТ 18 December 2001; ред. от 13 July 2015), available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_docs_LAW_34481/.Google Scholar

Compilation of Legislation of the Russian Federation (2003), No. 23, Item 2238 (Поручение Президента РФ № 323 от 3 июня 2003 года. Собрание законодательства Российской Федерации (СЗ РФ (2003) №3 ст. 2238)).Google Scholar

Executive Order No. 323 of 3 June 2003 (Sobranie zakonodatel’stva Rossiiskoy Federatsii).Google Scholar

Federal Constitutional Law No. 1-FKZ on 30 January 2002 ‘On Martial Law’ (with amendments on 12 March 2014) (ФеДералЬНЫЙ КоНсТИТуЦИоННЫЙ заКоН оТ 30 ЯНВарЯ 2002 Г. No. 1-ФКЗ “О ВоеННом ПолоЖеНИИ”; ред от 12 March 2014), available at: http://base.garant.ru/184121/1/#1100).Google Scholar

Federal Defence Law No.61 FZ on 31 May 1996 (with amendments on 12 February 2015) (ФеДералЬНЫЙ заΚоН оТ 31 маЯ 1996 Г. N 61-ФЗ “Об обороНе” (с ИзмеНеНИЯмИ И ДоПолНеНИЯмИ от 12 Feburary 2015).Google Scholar

Federal Law No. 101-FZ on 15 July 1995 ‘On International Treaties of the Russian Federation’ (with amendments on 12 March 2014) (ФеДералЬНЫЙ ЗаΚоН оТ 15 ИЮлЯ 1995 Г. N 101-ФЗ “О меЖДуНароДНЫх ДоГоВорах РоссИЙсΚоЙ ФеДераЦИИ” (ред. OT 12 March 2014), available at: http://base.garant.ru/10103790/).Google Scholar

Resolution of the Plenary Meeting of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated 10 October 2003, No. 5, ‘On Application of the Generally Recognized Principles and Norms of International Law and the International Treaties of Russia by Courts of General Jurisdiction’ (amendment No. 4, 5 March 2013) (Постановление Пленума Верховного суда РФ от 10.10.2003 г. № 5 “О применении судами общей юрисдикции общепризнанных принципов и норм международного права и международных договоров Российской Федерации”(В ред. № 4 от 05.03.2013)).Google Scholar

Resolution of the Plenary Meeting of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated 22 December 2009, No. 28, ‘On Application of Rules of Criminal Procedure Legislation that Regulate Preparation of a Criminal Case to Court Proceeding’ (Постановление Пленума Верховного суда РФ от 22.12.2009 г. № 28 (О применении норм уголовно-процессуального законодательства, регулирующих подготовку уголовного дела к судебному разбирательству(ред. от 28.06.2012)).Google Scholar

Kelsen, H., Principles of International Law (New York: Rinehart, 1952).Google Scholar

Brierly, J. L., ‘International Law in England’, Law Quarterly Review, 51 (1935), 24–35.Google Scholar

O’Keefe, R., ‘Customary International Crimes in English Courts’, British Yearbook of International Law, 72 (2001), 293–335.Google Scholar

O’Keefe, R., ‘The Doctrine of Incorporation Revisited’, British Yearbook of International Law, 79 (2008), 7–85.Google Scholar

A. M. Luther & Co. v. James Sagor & Co. [1921] KB 532.Google Scholar

Buttes Gas and Oil Co. v. Hammer (No. 3) [1982] AC 888.Google Scholar

Chandler v. Director of Public Prosecutions [1964] AC 763.Google Scholar

Chung Chi Cheung v. The King [1939] AC 160.Google Scholar

Cook v. Sprigg [1899] AC 572.Google Scholar

Council of Civil Service Unions v. Minister for the Civil Service [1985] AC 374.Google Scholar

Garland v. British Railway Engineering Ltd [1983] 2 AC 751.Google Scholar

In re McKerr [2004] UKHL 12, [2004] 1 WLR 807.Google Scholar

J. H. Rayner (Mincing Lane) v. Department of Trade and Industry [1990] 2 AC 418.Google Scholar

Knuller (Publishing, Printing and Promotions) Ltd v. Director of Public Prosecutions [1973] AC 435.Google Scholar

Kuwait Airways Corporation v. Iraqi Airways Company (Nos. 4 and 5) [2002] UKHL 19, [2002] AC 883.Google Scholar

Lord Advocate’s Reference No. 1 of 2000 2001 JC 143.Google Scholar

MacCormick v. Lord Advocate 1953 SC 396.Google Scholar

R (Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament) v. Prime Minister [2002] EWHC 2777 (Admin), 126 ILR 727.Google Scholar

R (European Roma Rights Centre) v. Immigration Officer at Prague Airport [2004] UKHL 55, [2005] 2 AC 1.Google Scholar

Republic of Ecuador v. Occidental Exploration and Production Co. [2005] EWCA Civ 1116, [2006] QB 432.Google Scholar

R v. Jones (Margaret) and Others [2004] EWCA Crim 1981, [2005] QB 259.Google Scholar

R v. Jones (Margaret) and Others [2006] UKHL 16, [2007] 1 AC 136.Google Scholar

R v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Brind [1991] 1 AC 696.Google Scholar

Triquet v. Bath (1764) 3 Burr 1478.Google Scholar

Trendtex Trading Corporation v. Central Bank of Nigeria [1977] QB 529.Google Scholar

Underhill v. Hernandez, 168 US 250 (1897).Google Scholar

Convention relating to the Status of Refugees (adopted 28 July 1951, entered into force 22 April 1954), 189 UNTS 2545.Google Scholar

Foreign & Commonwealth Office’s strategy paper on the International Criminal Court, 17 July 2013, available at: www.gov.uk/government/publications/international-criminal-court-strategy-paper.Google Scholar

Foreign & Commonwealth Office, Human Rights and Democracy: The 2012 Foreign & Commonwealth Office Report, Cm 8593 (2013).Google Scholar

ILC, ‘Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of its Fifty-Third Session, 23 April–1 June and 2 July–10 August 2001’, UN Doc. A/56/10 (2001).Google Scholar

Abou-Zahara, M., Al Garimah wa Al-Ukubah fe Al-Fikh Al-Islami (Crime and Punishment in Islamic Jurisprudence) (Cairo: Dar Al-Fikr Al-Araby, 1998).Google Scholar

Ambos, K., Treaties on International Criminal Law: The Crimes and Sentencing, vol. II (3 vols., Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Atlam, C., Tagrim Intihakat Al Kanoun Al Dowaly Al Insany: Manhag Wa Mawdoa Al Taadil Al Tashriaay ‘Derasah Mokaranah’ (Criminalizing Violations of International Humanitarian Law: Method and the Subject-Matter of Legislative Amendments: A Comparative Study), 2nd edn (Geneva: ICRC, 2004).Google Scholar

Auda, A., Al-Tashria Al-Genai Al-Islami Mukaranan bel Khanoon Al-Wadai (Islamic Criminal Legislation: A Comparison with Positive Law), vol. I (Cairo: Nadi Al-Koudah, 1984).Google Scholar

Brownlie, I., Principles of Public International Law, 6th edn (Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Cassese, A., International Criminal Law (Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Dinstein, Y., War, Aggression and Self-Defence, 5th edn (Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

El Zeidy, M. M., The Principle of Complementarity in International Criminal Law (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2008).Google Scholar

Goodrich, L. M. et al., Charter of the United Nations: Commentary and Documents, 3rd rev. edn (New York: Columbia University Press, 1969).Google Scholar

Gray, C., International Law and the Use of Force, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Herzog, C. and Gazil, S., The Arab Israeli Wars and Peace in the Middle East from the 1948 War of Independence to the Present, 2nd edn (New York: Vintage, 2005).Google Scholar

Khadduri, M., The Islamic Law of Nations: Shaybānīs Siyar (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Malekian, F., Principles of Islamic International Criminal Law: A Comparative Search, 2nd edn (Boston, MA: Brill, 2011).Google Scholar

McDougall, C., The Crime of Aggression under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Ramadan, S., Islamic Law: Its Scope and Equity (London: Safron Press, 1961).Google Scholar

Schabas, W. A., The International Criminal Court: A Commentary on the Rome Statute (Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Barriga, S., ‘Against the Odds: The Results of the Special Working Group on the Crime of Aggression’, in Barriga, S. et al. (eds.), The Princeton Process on the Crime of Aggression (Princeton University Press, 2009), 1–20.Google Scholar

Clark, R. S., ‘Complementarity and the Crime of Aggression’, in Stahn, C. and El Zeidy, M. M. (eds.), The International Criminal Court and Complementarity: From Theory to Practice (Cambridge University Press, 2011), 721–44.Google Scholar

Clark, R. S., ‘The Crime of Aggression’, in Stahn, C. (ed.), The Law and Practice of the International Criminal Court (Oxford University Press, 2015), 778–800.Google Scholar

Kirsch, N., ‘Article 39’, in Simma, B. et al. (eds.), The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary, 3rd edn, vol. II (2 vols., Oxford University Press, 2012), 1272–96.Google Scholar

Kirsch, N., ‘Article 42’, in Simma, B. et al. (eds.), The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary, 3rd edn, vol. II (2 vols., Oxford University Press, 2012), 1330–50.Google Scholar

Randelzhofer, A. and Dörr, A., ‘Article 2(4)’, in Simma, B. et al. (eds.), The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary, 3rd edn, vol. I (2 vols., Oxford University Press, 2012), 200–34.Google Scholar

Reisinger Coracini, A., ‘Evaluating Domestic Legislation on the Customary Crime of Aggression under the Rome Statute’s Complementarity Regime’, in Stahn, C. and Sluiter, G. (eds.), The Emerging Practice of the International Criminal Court (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2009), 725–54.Google Scholar

Schabas, W. A., ‘Origins of the Criminalization of Aggression: How Crimes against Peace Became the “Supreme International Crime”’, in Politi, M. and Nesi, G. (eds.), The International Criminal Court and the Crime of Aggression (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004), 17–32.Google Scholar

Ambos, K., ‘The Crime of Aggression after Kampala’, German Yearbook of International Law, 53 (2010), 463–509.Google Scholar

Broms, B., ‘An Appraisal of the Definition of Aggression in Theory and Practice’, Recueil des Cours, 154 (1977), 362–84.Google Scholar

Broms, B., ‘The Definition of Aggression’, Recueil des Cours, 154 (1977), 336–61.Google Scholar

Cassese, A., ‘When May Senior State Officials be Tried for International Crimes? Some Comments on the Congo v. Belgium Case’, European Journal of International Law, 13 (2002), 853–75.Google Scholar

Elbe, J., ‘The Evolution of the Concept of the Just War in International Law’, American Journal of International Law, 33 (1939), 665–68.Google Scholar

El Zeidy, M. M., ‘The United States Dropped the Atomic Bomb of Article 16 of the ICC Statute: Security Council Power of Deferrals and Resolution 1422’, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 35 (2002), 1503–44.Google Scholar

El Zeidy, M. M., ‘Universal Jurisdiction in Absentia: Is it a Legally Valid Option for Repressing Heinous Crimes?’, Oxford University Comparative Law Forum, 4 (2003), 835–61.Google Scholar

El Zeidy, M. M., ‘Egypt and Current Efforts to Criminalize International Crimes’, International Criminal Law Review, 5 (2005), 247–66.Google Scholar

El Zeidy, M. M. and Murphy, R., ‘Islamic Law on Prisoners of War and its Relationship with International Humanitarian Law’, Italian Yearbook of International Law, 14 (2004), 53–81.Google Scholar

Ferencz, B. F., ‘Aggressive War: The Biggest Crime Against Humanity’, Studies in Transnational Legal Policy, 43 (2011), 31–57.Google Scholar

Heinsch, R., ‘The Crime of Aggression after Kampala: Success or Burden for the Future’, Goettingen Journal of International Law 2 (2010), 713–43.Google Scholar

Hossain, K., ‘The Complementary Role of the United Nations General Assembly in Peace Management’, Usak Yearbook of International Politics and Law 2(2009), 69–87.Google Scholar

Kleffner, J., ‘The Impact of Complementarity on National Implementation of Substantive International Criminal Law’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 1 (2003), 86–113.Google Scholar

Kreß, C., ‘Universal Jurisdiction over International Crimes and the Institut de Droit International’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 4 (2006), 561–85.Google Scholar

Kreß, C. and von Holtzendorff, L., ‘The Kampala Compromise on the Crime of Aggression’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 8 (2010), 1179–217.Google Scholar

Lafontaine, F., ‘The Unbearable Lightness of International Obligations: When and How to Exercise Jurisdiction Under Canada’s Crimes against Humanity and War Crimes Act’, Revue Québécoise de droit international, 23 (2010), 1–50.Google Scholar

Mokhtar, A., ‘The Fine Art of Arm-Twisting: The US Resolution 1422 and Security Council Deferral Power under the Rome Statute’, International Criminal Law Review, 3 (2003), 295–344.Google Scholar

Schabas, W. A., ‘Canadian Implementing Legislation for the Rome Statute’, Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law, 3 (2000), 337–46.Google Scholar

Scharf, M., ‘Universal Jurisdiction and the Crime of Aggression’, Harvard International Law Journal, 53 (2012), 357–90.Google Scholar

Stahn, C., ‘The Ambiguities of Security Council Resolution 1422 (2002)’, European Journal of International Law, 14 (2003), 85–104.Google Scholar

Stahn, C., ‘Syria and the Semantics of Intervention, Aggression and Punishment. On “Red Lines” and “Blurred Lines”’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 11 (2013), 955–77.Google Scholar

Wright, Q., ‘The Middle Eastern Crisis’, American Society of International Law Proceedings, 64 (1970), 71–77.Google Scholar

Case Concerning Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda), ICJ Reports (2005), 168.Google Scholar

Case Concerning the Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000 (Democratic Republic of Congo v. Belgium), ICJ Reports (2002), 3.Google Scholar

Case Concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America), Merits, ICJ Reports (1986), 14.Google Scholar

Desire Munyaneza v. The Canadian Centre for International Justice et al. [2014 QCCA 906], Judgment, 7 May 2014.Google Scholar

National Commissioner of the South African Police Service v. Southern African Human Rights Litigation Centre (485/2012) [2013] ZASCA 168, 27 November 2013.Google Scholar

National Commissioner of the South African Police Service v. Southern African Human Rights Litigation Centre and Another [2014] ZACC 30, 30 October 2014.Google Scholar

Oil Platforms case (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America), ICJ Reports (2003), 161.Google Scholar

Ould Dah v. France, Decision on Admissibility, Application No. 13113/03, ECtHR, 17 March 2009.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Muthaura et al., Judgment on the Appeal of the Republic of Kenya against the Decision of Pre-Trial Chamber II of 30 May 2011 entitled ‘Decision on the Application by the Government of Kenya Challenging the Admissibility of the Case Pursuant to Article 19(2)(b) of the Statute’, ICC-01/09-02/11-274, 30 August 2011.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Tadić, Decision, ICTY-94-1-AR72, 2 October 1995.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga, Judgment on the Appeal of Mr Thomas Lubanga Dyilo against his Conviction, ICC-01/04-01/06-3121-Red, 1 December 2014.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Zejnil Delalic et al., Judgment, ICTY-96-21-T, 16 November 1998.Google Scholar

Arab League, Doc. (0040) ج-01/(01/09) 25/03-11 ج (on file with the author).Google Scholar

Arab League, Doc. 2005/11/29-21د-598ق).Google Scholar

Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (adopted 10 December 1984, entered into force 26 June 1987), 1465 UNTS 85.Google Scholar

Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Civil Aviation (adopted 23 September 1971, entered into force 16 January 1973, as amended on 24 February 1988), 974 UNTS 178.Google Scholar

Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Seizure of Aircraft (adopted 16 December 1970, entered into force 14 October 1971), 860 UNTS 105.Google Scholar

Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Crimes against Internationally Protected Persons, including Diplomatic Agents (adopted 14 December 1973, entered into force 20 February 1977), 1035 UNTS 167.Google Scholar

Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on their Destruction (adopted 13 January 1993, entered into force 29 April 1997), 1974 UNTS 45.Google Scholar

Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field (adopted 12 August 1949, entered into force 21 October 1950), 75 UNTS 31.Google Scholar

Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded, Sick and Shipwrecked Members of Armed Forces at Sea (adopted 12 August 1949, entered into force 21 October 1950), 75 UNTS 85.Google Scholar

Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War (adopted 12 August 1948, entered into force 21 October 1950), 75 UNTS 287.Google Scholar

Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War (adopted 12 August 1949, entered into force 21 October 1950), 75 UNTS 135.Google Scholar

Global Research, ‘Secret Memo by Donald Rumsfeld Proves Iraq War Started on False Pretenses’, 20 February 2013, available at: Arab_World.doc www.globalresearch.ca/secret-memo-by-donald-rumsfeld-proves-iraq-war-started-on-false-pretenses/5323576.Google Scholar

Human Rights Watch, ‘Universal Jurisdiction in Europe: The State of Art’, vol. XVIII, No. 5 (June 2006), 46, 50, available at: www.hrw.org/reports/2006/ij0606/index.htm.Google Scholar

International Convention against the Taking of Hostages (adopted 17 December 1979, entered into force 3 June 1983), 1316 UNTS 205.Google Scholar

Kirkup, J., ‘David Cameron: world setting a “dangerous” precedent not intervening in Syria’, The Telegraph, 6 September 2013, available at: www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/10291207/David-Cameron-world-setting-a-dangerous-precedent-not-intervening-in-Syria.html.Google Scholar

Meetings of the Arab Group of Experts Participating in the Seventh Session of the Preparatory Commission concerning the International Criminal Court (New York 26 February–9 March 2001) (First Meeting, 27 February 2001), (Third Meeting, 2 March 2001), (Fourth Meeting, 6 March 2001), (Sixth Meeting, 8 March 2001) (these reports are on file with the author).Google Scholar

Meetings of the Arab Group of Experts Participating in the Second Session of the Preparatory Commission concerning the International Criminal Court (New York 26 July–13 August 1999) (First Meeting, 27 July 1999), (Eighth Meeting, 5 August 1999) (on file with the author).Google Scholar

‘Memorandum submitted by Mr. Ricardo J. Alfaro’, UN Doc. A/CN.4/L.8, 30 May 1951, Yb ILC (1951), vol. II, 33.Google Scholar

Permanent Representatives of Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates to the United Nations, ‘Letter Dated 24 August 1990 to the President of the Security Council’, UN Doc. S/21639.Google Scholar

Permanent Representatives of Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates to the United Nations, ‘Letter Dated 8 August 1990 to the President of the Security Council’, UN Doc. S/21470.Google Scholar

Permanent Representative of Kuwait to the United Nations, ‘Letter Dated 2 August 1990 to the President of the Security Council’, UN Doc. S/21423.Google Scholar

Permanent Representative of Lebanon to the United Nations, ‘Letter Dated 11 April 1973 to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council’, UN Doc. S/10911.Google Scholar

Permanent Representative of Tunisia to the United Nations, ‘Letter Dated 1 October 1985 to the President of the Security Council’, UN Doc. S/17509.Google Scholar

Permanent Representative of the United Arab Republic, ‘Letter Dated 27 May 1967 addressed to the President of the Security Council’, UN Doc. S/7909.Google Scholar

Permanent Representative of the United Arab Republic, ‘Letter Dated 7 November 1967 addressed to the President of the Security Council’, UN Doc. S/8226.Google Scholar

Radia, K., ‘Russia Compares Syria War Drums to Iraq Invasion, Warns of Consequences of Intervention’, ABC News, 25 August 2013.Google Scholar

Records of the Meeting of the Committee of Experts and Representatives of the Arab States concerning the Coordination of the Arab Position regarding International Conferences and Treaties, Cairo, 13–17 April 2003.Google Scholar

Records of the Twentieth Meeting of the Committee of Experts and Representatives of the Arab States concerning the Coordination of the Arab Position regarding International Conferences and Treaties (Revision of the Arab Draft Model Law for the Crimes falling within the Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court), Cairo, 18–19 September 2005, Arab League, Doc. (0401) ج-01/(09/05) 02/03-11 ج (on file with the author).Google Scholar

Records of the Twenty-Fifth Meeting of the Arab Group of Experts … on the Examination of the Proposals tabled during the Seventh Session of the Assembly of States Parties Concerning the definition of the Crime of Aggression, Cairo, 28–29 January 2009, Arab League, Doc. (0040) ج-01/ (01/09) 25/03-11 ج (on file with the author).Google Scholar

‘Remarks on Syria’, Remarks by Secretary of State John Kerry, Press Briefing Room, 26 August 2013, available at: www.state.gov/secretary/remarks/2013/08/213503.htm.Google Scholar

Report and Recommendations of the Arab Group of Experts at the closing of the Eighth Session of the Preparatory Commission concerning the International Criminal Court, New York, 24 September–5 October 2001.Google Scholar

Report and Recommendations of the Arab Group of Experts for their Meetings during the Ninth Session of the Preparatory Commission concerning the International Criminal Court, New York, 8–19 April 2002 (these reports are on file with the author).Google Scholar

Report and Recommendations of the Eighth Meeting of the Committee of Experts and Representatives of the Arab States concerning the International Criminal Court, Cairo, 4–6 February 2001, 19 (on file with the author).Google Scholar

Report and Recommendations of the Meeting of the Committee of Experts and Representatives of the Arab States concerning the International Criminal Court, Cairo, 8–14 November 2000.Google Scholar

Report and Recommendations of the Ninth Meeting of the Committee of Experts and Representatives of the Arab States concerning the Coordination of the Arab Position regarding International Conferences and Treaties, Cairo, 9–13 June 2002.Google Scholar

Report of the Head of the Technical Secretariat for the Arab Ministers of Justice Council concerning the Eighth Session of the Preparatory Commission of the International Criminal Court, New York, 24 September–5 October 2001 (on file with the author).Google Scholar

Report on the Meeting of the Committee of Experts and Representatives of the Arab States concerning the International Criminal Court, Cairo, 20–24 June 1999, 6 (on file with the author).Google Scholar

Report on the Meeting of the Committee of Experts and Representatives of the Arab States concerning the International Criminal Court, Cairo, 25–28 January 1999 (on file with the author).Google Scholar

Resolution of the Executive Office for the Arab Justice Ministers Council, Arab League Doc. .(ق329-ج24-4/3/2002.Google Scholar

Secretary General, ‘Report: The Scope and Application of the Principle of Universal Jurisdiction’, 26 June 2013, UN Doc. A/68/113.Google Scholar

Security Council, Official Records, 1382nd Meeting, 22 November 1967, UN Doc. S/PV.1382 (OR).Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 188 (1964) concerning a Complaint by Yemen, 9 April 1964, UN Doc. S/5650.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 573 (1985) concerning Israel and Tunisia, 4 October 1985, UN Doc. S/RES/573.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 660 (1990) concerning Iraq and Kuwait, 2 August 1990, UN Doc. S/RES/660.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 678 (1990) concerning Iraq and Kuwait, 29 November 1990, UN Doc. S/RES/678.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 2118 (2013) concerning the Middle East, 27 September 2013, UN Doc. S/RES/2118.Google Scholar

Seventh Annual Report on the Implementation of International Humanitarian Law in the Middle East and North Africa 2012–2014.Google Scholar

Sixth Annual Report on the Implementation of the International Humanitarian Law at the Level of Arab States 2010/2011.Google Scholar

Special Advisor to the Director of Central Intelligence, ‘Comprehensive Report on Iraqi’s WMD with Addendums’, vols. I–III, 30 September 2004.Google Scholar

Summary of the Arab Coordination Meetings on the sideline of the Seventh Session of the Assembly of States Parties to the Rome Statute, The Hague, 14–22 November 2008, Arab League Doc. (0040) ج-01/(01/09) 25/03-11ج.Google Scholar

US Government, ‘Assessment of the Syrian Government’s Use of Chemical Weapons on August 21, 2013’, 30 August 2013, available at: www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/08/30/government-assessment-syrian-government-s-use-chemical-weapons-august-21.Google Scholar

US Secretary of State John Kerry, ‘Statement on Syria’, Treaty Room, 30 August 2013, US Department of State, available at: www.state.gov/secretary/remarks/2013/08/213668.htm.Google Scholar

Wilmshurst, E., ‘Definition of Aggression’, United Nations Audiovisual Library of International Law, available at: www.un.org/avl.Google Scholar

Barriga, S. and Kreß, C., The Travaux Préparatoires of the Crime of Aggression (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Boister, N. and Cryer, R. (eds.), Documents on the Tokyo International Military Tribunal, Charter, Indictment and Judgments (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Bonnieu, M., Projet de nouveau code pénal, commenté et comparé (Cambodia, 2005).Google Scholar

Brownlie, I., International Law and the Use of Force by States (Oxford University Press, 1963).Google Scholar

Chan, W-C., Wright, B. and Yeo, S., Codification, Macaulay and the Indian Penal Code: The Legacies and Modern Challenges of Criminal Law Reform (Farnham: Ashgate, 2011).Google Scholar

Cryer, R., Friman, H., Robinson, D. and Wilmshurst, E., An Introduction to International Criminal Law and Procedure (Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Dinstein, Y., War, Aggression and Self-Defence, 3rd edn (Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Eser, A., Sieber, U. and Kreicker, H., Nationale Strafverfolgung völkerrechtlicher Verbrechen (National Prosecution of International Crimes) (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2005).Google Scholar

Hall, S., Foundations of International Law (Hong Kong: LexisNexis, 2012).Google Scholar

Kembayev, Z. (ed.), Introduction to the Law of Kazakhstan (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2012).Google Scholar

Reisinger Coracini, A., ‘National Legislation on Individual Responsibility for Conduct Amounting to Aggression’, in Bellelli, R. (ed.), International Criminal Justice, Law and Practice from the Rome Statute to its Review (Farnham: Ashgate, 2010), 547–78.Google Scholar

Arai, K., Mayama, A. and Yoshida, O., ‘Japan’s Accession to the ICC Statute and the ICC Cooperation Law’, Japanese Yearbook of International Law, 51 (2008), 359–83.Google Scholar

Broms, B., ‘The Definition of Aggression’, Hague Recueil, 154 (1977), 356–57.Google Scholar

Clark, R. S., ‘The “Decolonization” of East Timor and the United Nations Norms on Self-Determination and Aggression’, Yale Journal of World Public Order, 7 (1980–1981), 2–44.Google Scholar

Friedberg, A. L., ‘Ripe for Rivalry: Prospects for Peace in a Multipolar Asia’, International Security, 18 (1993–94), 5–33.Google Scholar

Heller, H. J., ‘Retreat from Nuremberg: The Leadership Requirement in the Crime of Aggression’, European Journal of International Law, 18 (2007), 477–97.Google Scholar

de Hoogh, A. J. J., ‘Australia and East Timor, Rights Erga Omnes, Complicity and Non-Recognition’, Australian International Law Journal, 6 (1999), 63–90.Google Scholar

Howard, J., ‘Invoking State Responsibility for Aiding the Commission of International Crimes: Australia, the United States and the Question of East Timor’, Melbourne Journal of International Law, 2 (2001), 1–47.Google Scholar

ICRC, ‘National Implementation of International Humanitarian Law: Biannual Update on National Legislation and Case Law, January to June 2010’, International Review of the Red Cross, 92(879) (September 2010), 809–22.Google Scholar

Linton, S., ‘Bangladesh and the Prosecution of International Crimes from the 1971 War of Independence from Pakistan’, Criminal Law Forum, 21 (2010), 187–90.Google Scholar

Linton, S., ‘Completing the Circle: Accountability for the Crimes of the 1971 Bangladesh War of Liberation’, Criminal Law Forum, 21 (2010), 191–311.Google Scholar

Masaki, Y., ‘Japan’s Entry to the International Criminal Court and the Legal Challenges it Faced’, Japanese Yearbook of International Law, 51 (2008), 409–26.Google Scholar

Meierhenrich, J. and Ko, K., ‘How do States Join the International Criminal Court? The Implementation of the Rome Statute in Japan’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 7 (2009), 233–56.Google Scholar

Niriella, J., ‘An Appraisal on Some Aspects of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court’, Sri Lanka Journal of International Law, 21 (2009), 193–214.Google Scholar

Paust, J. J. and Blaustein, A. P., ‘War Crimes Jurisdiction and Due Process: The Bangladesh Experience’, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 11 (1978), 1–38.Google Scholar

Quigley, J., ‘Viet Nam’s First Model Penal Code’, New York Law School Journal of International and Comparative Law, 9 (1988), 143–93.Google Scholar

Ramanathan, U., ‘India and the ICC’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 3 (2005), 627–34.Google Scholar

Scheffer, D., ‘States Parties Approve New Crimes for International Criminal Court’, American Society of International Law Insights, vol. 14, Issue 16, 22 June 2010.Google Scholar

Takayama, K., ‘Participation in the ICC and the National Criminal Law of Japan’, Japanese Yearbook of International Law, 51 (2008), 384–408.Google Scholar

Trahan, J., ‘The Rome Statute’s Amendment on the Crime of Aggression: Negotiations at the Kampala Review Conference’, International Criminal Law Review, 11 (2011), 49–104.Google Scholar

Tzu-Hsiu Lin, C., ‘The International Criminal Court: Taiwan’s Last Hope?’, Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal, 755 (1997), 766–68.Google Scholar

R v. Jones (Appellant) [2006] UKHL 16.Google Scholar

Request for Interpretation of the Judgment of 15 June 1962 in the Case Concerning the Temple of Preah Vihear (Cambodia v. Thailand), Request for the Indication of Provisional Measures, Order of 18 July 2011.Google Scholar

Agreement on Reconciliation, Non-Aggression, and Exchanges and Cooperation between South and North, signed 13 December 1991, effective 19 February 1992.Google Scholar

Ahamed, S., ‘The Curious Case of the 195 War Criminals’, Forum, A Monthly Publication of the Daily Star, vol. 3(5), May 2010, available at: www.thedailystar.net/forum/2010/may/curious.htm.Google Scholar

Amnesty International, Fact Sheet, Indonesia and the International Criminal Court, AI Index: ASA 21/020/2006 (Public).Google Scholar

Amnesty International, ‘Stalled Reforms: Impunity, Discrimination and Security Force Violations in Indonesia’, Amnesty International Submission to the UN Universal Periodic Review, May–June 2012, 4, available at: http://asia-pacific-solidarity.net/southeastasia/indonesia/reports/ai_stalledreforms_000512.pdf.Google Scholar

‘An Act Defining and Penalizing Crimes against International Humanitarian Law, Genocide and other Crimes against Humanity, Organizing Jurisdiction, Designating Special Courts, and for Related Purposes’, Republic Act No. 9851, 11 December 2009, available at: www.redcross.org.ph/ihl.Google Scholar

Bangladesh Penal Code, Act No. XLV of 1860, available at: http://bdlaws.minlaw.gov.bd/print_sections_all.php?id=11.Google Scholar

Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China, adopted on 4 April 1990 by the Seventh National People’s Congress of the People’s Republic of China at its Third Session, published by the Constitutional Affairs Bureau, Hong Kong, July 2006, available at: www.basiclaw.gov.hk/en/basiclawtext/index.html.Google Scholar

Brown, K., ‘Four Decades Later, Justice in Bangladesh’, available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2055336.Google Scholar

Cheung, B., Criminal Code, Khmer–English Translation (unofficial), 2011 (on file with author).Google Scholar

Constitution of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka, 7 September 1978, last amended 9 September 2012, available at: www.priu.gov.lk/Cons/1978Constitution/Introduction.htm.Google Scholar

Constitution of the People’s Republic of China, promulgated by the National People’s Congress, 14 March 2004.Google Scholar

Constitution of the Republic of Tajikistan, 6 November 1994, Text of Tajik Constitution originally published in Russian, 30 November 1994, Leninabadskaya Pravda (Khudzhand, Tajikistan) FBIS-SOV-94-243, available at: www.unodc.org/tldb/pdf/Tajikistan_const_1994.pdf.Google Scholar

Constitution of the Republic of Korea, 17 July 1948, as amended (most recently) 29 October 1987, available at: www.unodc.org/tldb/pdf/Korea_const_1987.doc.Google Scholar

Criminal Act of the Republic of Korea, Act No. 293, 18 September 1953, as amended (last amendment 29 July 2005), available at: www.moj.go.kr/HP/COM/bbs_03/BoardList.do?strOrgGbnCd=109000&strRtnURL=ENG_4030&strNbodCd=noti0317.Google Scholar

Criminal Code of the Republic of China, Ministry of Justice, amended 30 November 2011, available at: http://law.moj.gov.tw/ENG/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=C0000001.Google Scholar

Criminal Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Law No. 167 of 16 July 1997 of the Republic of Kazakhstan, as amended, unofficial translation 6 September 1999, available at: www.unodc.org/tldb/pdf/Kazakhstan/KAZ_Crim_Law_1999_ENpdf.pdf, also at www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text.jsp?file_id=200055.Google Scholar

Criminal Code of Mongolia (revised), 1 September 2002, available at: www.unodc.org/tldb/showDocument.do?documentUid=2931.Google Scholar

Criminal Code of the Republic of Tajikistan, in Russian, available at: www.unodc.org/tldb/pdf/TAJ-CriminalCode.pdf.Google Scholar

Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China, National People’s Congress, Order No. 83, effective 10 January 1997, eighth revision 25 February 2011.Google Scholar

Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China, Part II, chapter I: Crimes of Endangering National Security.Google Scholar

Foulkes, I., ‘Putting Words into Action’, The Magazine of the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement, available at: www.redcross.int/EN/mag/magazine2012_1/4-9.html.Google Scholar

Foreign Policy of the Republic of Uzbekistan, the Governmental Portal of the Government of Uzbekistan, www.gov.uz/en/business/international/1184.Google Scholar

Gao, M. and Wang, J., ‘Issues of Concern to China Regarding the International Criminal Court’, paper prepared for the Symposium on the International Criminal Court, 3–4 February 2007, Beijing, China, International Center for Criminal Law Reform and Criminal Justice Policy, Vancouver, Canada, available at: www.icclr.law.ubc.ca/site%20map/icc/IssueofConcern.pdf.Google Scholar

General Assembly, Affirmation of the Principles, 11 December 1946, UN Doc. A/RES/1/95.Google Scholar

Hong Kong Bill of Rights Ordinance, Cap 383, available at: www.legislation.gov.hk/eng/home.htm.Google Scholar

Hong Kong, National Security (Legislative Provisions) Bill, 2003, available at: www.basiclaw23.gov.hk/english/download/s3200307077.pdf.Google Scholar

Hong Kong, Societies Ordinance, cap. 151, available at: www.legislation.gov.hk/eng/home.htm.Google Scholar

Human Rights Committee, Consideration of Reports submitted by States Parties under Article 40 of the Covenant, Initial Report, Tajikistan, CCPR/C/TJK/2004/1, 11 April 2005, original in Russian, 19 July 2004.Google Scholar

Huskey, K. A., ‘The International Crimes Tribunal in Bangladesh: Will Justice Prevail?’, Crimes of War, available at: www.crimesofwar.org/commentary/the-international-crimes-tribunal-in-bangladesh-will-justice-prevail.Google Scholar

‘Incorporating the Crime of Aggression as a Leadership Crime into the Definition’, Working Group on the Crime of Aggression, Proposal submitted by Belgium, Cambodia, Sierra Leone and Thailand, PCNICC/2002/WGCA/DP.5, 8 July 2002.Google Scholar

Indian Penal Code, Act No. 45 of 1860, available at: http://indiacode.nic.in.Google Scholar

Information system of normative legal acts of the Republic of Kazakhstan, available at: http://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/T9700167_1_/t97167_1.htm (in Russian).Google Scholar

International Crimes (Tribunals) Act, 1973, Act No. XIX of 1973, available at: http://bdlaws.minlaw.gov.bd/print_sections_all.php?id=435.Google Scholar

International Crimes Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2010, Dhaka, Bangladesh, Notification, 15 July 2010, available at: http://justicebd.org/top-menu/92-the-international-crimes-tribunal-rules-of-procedure-2010 or www.internationallawbureau.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/ICT-BD-Rules-of-Procedure.pdf.Google Scholar

Japan, Act No. 117 of 2004, available at: www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?re=02&dn=1&x=0&y=0&co=1&yo=&gn=&sy=&ht=&no=&bu=&ta=&ky=armed+attack+situation+response+law&page=1.Google Scholar

Japan, Act No. 115 of 2004.Google Scholar

Japan, Act on Cooperation for the International Criminal Court, Act No. 37 of 2007.Google Scholar

Japan, Armed Attack Situation Response Law, Act No. 79 of 2003.Google Scholar

Japan Penal Code, Act No. 45 of 1907, available at: www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=1960&vm=04&re=02&new=1.Google Scholar

Japan, Subversive Activities Prevention Act, Act No. 240 of July 21, 1952, available at: www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?ft=5&re=02&dn=1&gn=99&sy=1952&ht=A&no=240&x=50&y=12&ky=&page=1.Google Scholar

Joehnk, T. F., ‘A War Crimes Court and a Travesty of Justice’, International Herald Tribune, 29 November 2011, available at: http://latitude.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/11/29/a-war-crimes-court-and-a-travesty-of-justice.Google Scholar

Khan, I., ‘Prison Term for Helping C.I.A Find Bin Laden’, New York Times, 23 May 2012, available at: www.nytimes.com/2012/05/24/world/asia/doctor-who-helped-find-bin-laden-given-jail-term-official-says.html?_r=0.Google Scholar

Keynote Address by Ichiro Komatsu, Ambassador of Japan to the Swiss Confederation, ICC Seminar at ITC Maurya Seraton Hotel, New Delhi, India, 18 March 2009, available at: www.mofa.go.jp/policy/i_crime/icc/seminar0903-a2.html.Google Scholar

Laos People’s Democratic Republic, Penal Law, National Assembly No. 12/NA, 9 November 2005, Official translation by National Assembly, available at: www.unodc.org/tldb/showDocument.do?documentUid=3973&q=aggression&edit_btn=SEARCH.Google Scholar

Law No. 226-V (entered into force on 1 January 2015), available in Russian at: http://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=31575252&sublink=4670000.Google Scholar

Law on the Republic of Uzbekistan, On Enactment of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan, No. 2012-XII, 22 September 1994, available at: www.unodc.org/tldb/pdf/Uzbekistan/UZB_Crim_Law.pdf. Also at: http://legislationline.org/download/action/download/id/1712/file/a45cbf3cc66c17f04420786aa164.htm/preview.Google Scholar

Laws of Malaysia, Act 574, Penal Code, incorporating all amendments up to 1 January 2006, published by the Commissioner of Law Revision, Malaysia, under the authority of the Revision of Laws Act 1968, in collaboration with Percetakan Nasional Malaysia BHD, 2006, available at: www.unodc.org/tldb.Google Scholar

Law of the People’s Republic of China on National Defence, Order No. 84, promulgated on 14 March 1997.Google Scholar

‘Letter of Notification of Treaties Applicable to Hong Kong after 1 July 1997, deposited by the Government of the People’s Republic of China with the Secretary-General of the United Nations on 20 June 1997’, 36 ILM 1675–91, available at the Hong Kong Treaty Project website at: www.law.hku.hk/ccpl/database/prclette.htm.Google Scholar

Lunn, J. and Thorp, A., ‘Bangladesh, The International Crimes Tribunal’, House of Commons Library Note SN06318, 3 May 2012, available at: www.parliament.uk/briefing-papers/SN06318.Google Scholar

Malaysian Constitution, available at: www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text.jsp?file_id=194852.Google Scholar

Mohd. Amin bin Mohd Razali & 18 Yang Iain Lwn. Pendakwa Raya &#8211, [2003] MYFC; 26 June 2003 - MPRJ No: 05-(02-20)-2002(W) & Rayuan Balas (26 June 2003), available at: www.commonlii.org/cgi-bin/disp.pl/my/cases/MYFC/2003/5.html?stem=0&synonyms=0&query=Waging%20war%20against.Google Scholar

Muntarbhorn, V., ‘The Future of ICC in Asia’, ANICC News Bulletin, A Publication of the Asian Network for an International Criminal Court (ANICC), vol. 1(1), December 1999.Google Scholar

Myanmar Penal Code, India Act XLV. 1860 (1 May 1861), hard copy on file with author, also available at: www.blc-burma.org/html/myanmar%20penal%20code/mpc.html.Google Scholar

New Law Reports, vol. 67, 193, available at: www.lawnet.lk/docs/case_law/nlr/common/html/NLR67V193.htm.Google Scholar

Pakistan Penal Code (Act XLV of 1860), 6 October 1860, as amended 2006.Google Scholar

Parliamentarians for Global Action, Kampala/New York, 28 May 2010, available at: www.iccnow.org/documents/PGQ_Press_Statement_6th_CAP_ICC__2_.pdf.Google Scholar

Parliament of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka, Geneva Conventions Act, No. 4 of 2006, Part I, Article 2(1), available at: www.documents.gov.lk/Acts/2006/Geneva%20Convention%20Act%20No.%204%20of%202006/Act%20No.%204%20%28E%29.pdf.Google Scholar

Penal Code of Bhutan, 2004, Royal Government of Bhutan, available at: www.unodc.org/tldb/showDocument.do?documentUid=9785.Google Scholar

Penal Code of Indonesia, Directorate General of Law and Legislation, Ministry of Justice, amended 1999, available at: www.unodc.org/tldb/showDocument.do?documentUid=6843.Google Scholar

Penal Code of the Democratic Republic of Timor Leste, Decree Law No. 19/2009, available at: www.unodc.org/tldb/showDocument.do?documentUid=10851.Google Scholar

Permanent People’s Tribunal, Tribunal on Sri Lanka, Dublin, 14–16 January 2010, Report, 19–20, available at: www.ptsrilanka.org/images/M_images/documents/peoples_tribunal_on_srilanka.pdf.Google Scholar

Philippine Act on Crimes against International Humanitarian Law, Genocide, and Other Crimes against Humanity, Republic Act No. 9851, 11 December 2009, available at: www.redcross.org.ph/ihl.Google Scholar

Reiger, C., ‘Fighting Past Impunity in Bangladesh: A National Tribunal for the Crimes of 1971’, ICTJ Briefing, July 2010.Google Scholar

Report of the Secretary General’s Panel of Experts on Accountability in Sri Lanka, 31 March 2011, available at: www.un.org/News/dh/infocus/Sri_Lanka/POE_Report_Full.pdf.Google Scholar

Republic of Korea, Act on the Punishment of Crimes within the Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court, enacted on 21 December 2007, Act No. 8719, available at: www.moj.go.kr/HP/COM/bbs_03/ListShowData.do?strNbodCd=noti0314&strWrtNo=7&strAnsNo=A&strFilePath=&strRtnURL=ENG_4030&strThisPage=1&strNbodCdGbn=&strOrgGbnCd=109000.Google Scholar

Revised Penal Code, Philippines, An Act Revising the Penal Code and other Penal Laws, 8 December 1930, available at: www.unodc.org/tldb/showDocument.do?documentUid=2268.Google Scholar

Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 1267 (1999), Note verbale dated 9 July 2003 from the Permanent Mission of Malaysia to the United Nations addressed to the Chairman of the Committee, 10 July 2003, UN Doc. S/AC.37/2003/(1455)/57.Google Scholar

Security Council Meetings Coverage, Security Council Condemns Attack on Republic of Korea Naval Ship ‘Cheonan’, Presidential Statement, 9 July 2010, UN Doc. SC/9975, available at: www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2010/sc9975.doc.htm.Google Scholar

Security Council Press Statement on Cambodia–Thailand Border Situation, 14 February 2011, UN Doc. SC/10174.Google Scholar

Security Council Resolution 82 (1950), concerning Complaint of Aggression upon the Republic of Korea, 25 June 1950, UN Doc. S/RES/82.Google Scholar

Singapore Penal Code, Revised edition 2008, 30 November 2008, latest amendment 2 January 2011, available at: http://statutes.agc.gov.sg/aol/search/display/view.w3p;page=0;query=DocId%3A%22025e7646-947b-462c-b557-60aa55dc7b42%22%20Status%3Ainforce%20Depth%3A0;rec=0;whole=yes.Google Scholar

Sino-British Joint Declaration on the question of Hong Kong, Beijing, 19 December 1984, available at: www.cmab.gov.hk/en/issues/joint2.htm#1.Google Scholar

Socialist Republic of Vietnam, Penal Code, the National Assembly, No. 15/1999/QH10, 21 December 1999, available at: http://moj.gov.vn/vbpq/en/Lists/Vn%20bn%20php%20lut/View_Detail.aspx?ItemID=610.Google Scholar

Sri Lanka Code of Criminal Procedure Act (No. 15 of 1979), available at: www.commonlii.org/lk/legis/num_act/cocpa15o1979276.Google Scholar

Sri Lanka Penal Code (An Ordinance to Provide a General Penal Code for Ceylon), No. 2 of 1883, as amended most recently by Act No. 50 of 1980, sections 114 and 121, available at: www.lawnet.lk/process.php?st=2001Y1V19C&hword=%27%27&path=5.Google Scholar

Thailand Criminal Code, Act promulgating the Criminal Code, B.E. 2499 (1956), as amended Criminal Code (No. 17), B.E. 2547 (2003), available at: www.thailandlawonline.com/Laws/criminal-law-thailand-penal-code.html.Google Scholar

Treaty of Non-Aggression, Bangkok, 12 June 1940 [1941] LNTSer 28; 203 LNTS 421.Google Scholar

Trial of German Major War Criminals, Proceedings of the IMT, pts 1–22 (1947–9), Judgment of 1 October 1946, pt. 22, 421.Google Scholar

United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, Opinion No. 26/2011 (Bangladesh), 12 September 2011, available at: www.internationallawbureau.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/UN-Working-Group-ICT-Opinion.pdf.Google Scholar

Yusufzai, A., ‘Osama’s Shadow Haunts Doctor’, Inter Press Service News Agency, available at: www.ipsnews.net/2012/06/osamas-shadow-haunts-doctor.Google Scholar

American Law Institute (ed.), The Restatement (Third) of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States (St. Paul, MN: American Law Institute Publishers, 1986).Google Scholar

Ferdinandusse, W. N., Direct Application of International Criminal Law in National Courts (The Hague: T. M. C. Asser, 2006).Google Scholar

International Centre for Criminal Law Reform and Criminal Justice Policy (ed.), International Criminal Court, Manual for the Ratification and Implementation of the Rome Statute, 3rd edn (Vancouver: ICCLR, March 2008), available at: www.iccnow.org/documents/ICC_Manual_-_March_2008_-_ICLR.pdf.Google Scholar

Sayapin, S., The Crime of Aggression in International Criminal Law (The Hague: T. M. C. Asser, 2014).Google Scholar

Bourgon, S., ‘Jurisdiction ratione loci’, in Cassese, A., Gaeta, P. and Jones, J. R. W. D. (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, vol. I (2 vols., Oxford University Press, 2002), 559–69.Google Scholar

Parmas, A. and Ploom, T., ‘Estonia’, in Eser, A., Sieber, U. and Kreicker, H. (eds.), Nationale Strafverfolgung völkerrechtlicher Verbrechen/National Prosecution of International Crimes, vol. V (7 vols., Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2005), 93–187.Google Scholar

Randelzhofer, A. and Dörr, A., ‘Article 2(4)’, in Simma, B. (ed.), The Charter of the United Nations, A Commentary, 3rd edn (Oxford University Press, 2012), 200–34.Google Scholar

Reisinger Coracini, A., ‘Defining the Crime of Aggression for the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court’, in Stahn, C. and van den Herik, L. (eds.), Future Perspectives on International Criminal Justice (The Hague: T. M. C. Asser, 2010), 425–49.Google Scholar

Reisinger Coracini, A., ‘National Legislation on Individual Responsibility for Conduct Amounting to Aggression’, in Bellelli, R. (ed.), International Criminal Justice Law and Practice from the Rome Statute to its Review (Farnham: Ashgate, 2010), 547–78.Google Scholar

Škulić, M., ‘Serbien und Montenegro’, in Eser, A. and Kreicker, H. (eds.), Nationale Strafverfolgung völkerrechtlicher Verbrechen/National Prosecution of International Crimes, vol. III (7 vols., Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2004), 217–385.Google Scholar

Tallgren, I., ‘The Finnish War-Responsibility Trial in 1945–6: The Limits of Ad Hoc Criminal Justice’, in Heller, K. J. and Simpson, G. (eds.), The Hidden Histories of War Crimes Trials (Oxford University Press, 2013), 430–54.Google Scholar

Weigend, E., ‘Polen’, in Eser, A. and Kreicker, H. (eds.), Nationale Strafverfolgung völkerrechtlicher Verbrechen (National Prosecution of International Crimes), vol. II (7 vols., Freiburg im Breisgau: Albin Eser, 2003), 82–179.Google Scholar

Adams, K. A. and Kaye, A. S., ‘Revisiting the Ambiguity of “And” and “Or” in Legal Drafting’, St. John’s Law Review, 80 (2007), 1167–98.Google Scholar

Allain, J., ‘The True Challenge to the United Nations System of the Use of Force: The Failures of Kosovo and Iraq and the Emergence of the African Union’, Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, 8 (2004), 237–89.Google Scholar

Broms, B., ‘The Definition of Aggression’, Recueil des Cours, 154 (1977), 301–99.Google Scholar

Bühler, K. G. and Reisinger Coracini, A., ‘Die Umsetzung des Römischen Statuts in Österreich’, Zeitschrift für internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik, 10 (2015), 59–67.Google Scholar

Du Plessis, M., ‘Implications of the AU Decision to give the African Court Jurisdiction over International Crimes’, Institute for Security Studies, Paper No. 235, June 2012, 1–14.Google Scholar

Kioko, B., ‘The Right of Intervention under the African Union’s Constitutive Act: From Non-Interference to Non-Intervention’, International Review of the Red Cross, 852 (2003), 807–25.Google Scholar

Kreß, C., ‘The German Chief Federal Prosecutor’s Decision Not to Investigate the Alleged Crime of Preparing Aggression against Iraq’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 2 (2004), 245–64.Google Scholar

Villarino Villa, C., ‘The Crime of Aggression before the House of Lords: Chronicle of a Death Foretold’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 4 (2006), 866–78.Google Scholar

Case Concerning Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda), Judgment, ICJ Reports (2005), 168.Google Scholar

Botschaft zur Genehmigung der Änderungen des Römer Statuts des Internationalen Strafgerichtshofs betreffend das Verbrechen der Aggression und die Kriegsverbrechen vom 19. Februar 2014, available at: www.admin.ch/opc/de/federal-gazette/2014/2045.pdf.Google Scholar

Constitutive Act of the African Union (adopted 7 November 2000, entered into force 26 May 2001), available at: http://au.int/en/treaties.Google Scholar

Convention for the Definition of Aggression of 3 July 1933, 69 LNTS 1934.Google Scholar

European Parliament, Resolution of 17 November 2011 on EU support for the ICC: Facing Challenges and Overcoming Difficulties (2011/2109(INI)), available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu.Google Scholar

European Parliament, Resolution of 17 July 2014 on the Crime of Aggression, 2014/2724(RSP), available at: www.europarl.europa.eu.Google Scholar

German Chief Federal Prosecutor, Press Release No. 10, 22 April 1999, available at: www.glasnost.de/kosovo/urteilstrafanz.html.Google Scholar

German Chief Federal Prosecutor, Press Statement, JZ 2003, 908.Google Scholar

Parliamentarians for Global Action, ‘Legislative Sample for Members of Parliaments to “Domesticate” the Crime of Aggression’, available at: http://crimeofaggression.info/documents/4/PGA_Implementing_legislation-drafting_assistance.pdf.Google Scholar

Protocol on Amendments to the Protocol on the Statute of the African Court of Justice and Human Rights, as approved and recommended to the AU Assembly for adoption by the Meeting of Government Experts and Ministers of Justice/Attorneys, Addis Ababa, 15 May 2012, Exp/Min/IV/Rev.7.Google Scholar

Protocol on Amendments to the Protocol on the Statute of the African Court of Justice and Human Rights (adopted 27 June 2014), Doc. No. EX.CL/846(XXV) Annex 5, available at: http://au.int/en/treaties.Google Scholar

Protocol on the Statute of the African Court of Justice and Human Rights (adopted 1 July 2008), available at: http://au.int/en/treaties.Google Scholar

Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights (adopted 10 June 1998, entered into force 25 January 2004), available at: http://au.int/en/treaties.Google Scholar

Resolución de la Corte Penal Internacional y Ratificación de las Enmiendas de Kampala, Res. AO/2013/07, XXIX Asamblea General Del Parlamento Latinoamericano, Ciudad de Panamá, 19 y 20 de octubre de 2013, available at: http://www.parlatino.org.Google Scholar

R v. Jones et al. [2006] UKHL 16.Google Scholar

Status of Ratification and Implementation of the Kampala Amendments on the Crime of Aggression, Update No. 18 (information as of 26 June 2015), available at: http://crimeofaggression.info/documents//1/Status_Report-ENG.pdf.Google Scholar