Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-94d59 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-19T10:02:06.465Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Creative Genius, Knowledge, and Reason: The Lives and Works of Eminent Creators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2010

Dean Keith Simonton
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of California at Davis, Davis, California
James C. Kaufman
Affiliation:
California State University, San Bernardino
John Baer
Affiliation:
Rider University, New Jersey
Get access

Summary

Many creative geniuses attain reputations of almost mythical proportions. Apparently gifted with a special insight or intuitive power, creative ideas are supposed to pop into their heads in flashes of inspiration. In earlier times, this almost mystical process would be attributed to divine intervention, as is evident in the Greek doctrine of the Muses. Even during the Renaissance the greatest artist of the period would be called the “divine Michelangelo,” an artistic genius who, according to his biographer Vasari, was sent to earth by God to bless the world with his talent. Centuries later, when such religious attributions were no longer fashionable, creative genius would become linked with madness. This linkage became especially prominent during the Romantic Era of 19th-century Europe. A well-known illustration is to be found in the Preface to Kublai Khan in which the poet Coleridge claimed to have conceived his poem in an opium-induced stupor. Eventually psychiatrists, psychoanalysts, and even psychologists were joining the chorus, associating creative genius with insanity and even criminality. The consensus seemed to be that creative geniuses were not like normal human beings. They had thought processes and personalities that set them apart from other members of the species.

Yet at the beginning of the 20th century a shift was taking place. Creative genius was not so special after all. This change first was apparent in attitudes toward scientific creativity.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boden, M. A. (1991). The creative mind: Myths & mechanisms. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, G. F., Langley, P. W., & Simon, H. A. (1983). Studying scientific discovery by computer simulation. Science, 222, 971–975.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cattell, J. M. (1903). A statistical study of eminent men. Popular Science Monthly, 62, 359–377.Google Scholar
Davis, R. A. (1987). Creativity in neurological publications. Neurosurgery, 20, 652–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennis, W. (1966). Creative productivity between the ages of 20 and 80 years. Journal of Gerontology, 21, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ericsson, K. A. (1996). The acquisition of expert performance: An introduction to some of the issues. In Ericsson, K. A. (Ed.), The road to expert performance: Empirical evidence from the arts and sciences, sports, and games (pp. 1–50). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Goertzel, M. G., Goertzel, V., & Goertzel, T. G. (1978). 300 eminent personalities: A psychosocial analysis of the famous. San Francisco: Jossey–Bass.Google Scholar
Gruber, H. E. (1989). Networks of enterprise in creative scientific work. In Gholson, B., Shadish, W. R. Jr., Neimeyer, R. A., & Houts, A. C. (Eds.), The psychology of science: Contributions to metascience (pp. 246–265). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadamard, J. (1945). The psychology of invention in the mathematical field. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hayes, J. R. (1989). The complete problem solver (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, D. (2002). Staring Emmy straight in the eye – and doing my best not to flinch. In Dartnall, T. (Ed.), Creativity, cognition, and knowledge: An interaction (pp. 67–104). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Holland, J. H. (1992). Genetic algorithms. Scientific American, 267(1), 66–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holton, G. (1971–1972). On trying to understand the scientific genius. American Scholar, 41, 95–110.Google Scholar
James, W. (1880). Great men, great thoughts, and the environment. Atlantic Monthly, 46, 441–459.Google Scholar
Klahr, D. (2000). Exploring science: The cognition and development of discovery processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Koza, J. R. (1992). Genetic programming: On the programming of computers by means of natural selection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kulkarni, D., & Simon, H. A. (1988). The process of scientific discovery: The strategy of experimentation. Cognitive Science, 12, 139–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langley, P., Simon, H. A., Bradshaw, G. L., & Zythow, J. M. (1987). Scientific discovery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lehman, H. C. (1953). Age and achievement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lindauer, M. S. (2003). Aging, creativity, and art: A positive perspective on late-life development. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Ortega y Gasset, J. (1957). The revolt of the masses (M. Adams, Trans.). New York: Norton. (Original work published 1932)Google Scholar
Planck, M. (1949). Scientific autobiography and other papers (F. Gaynor, Trans.). New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
Platz, A. (1965). Psychology of the scientist: Ⅺ. Lotka's law and research visibility. Psychological Reports, 16, 566–568.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Platz, A., & Blakelock, E. (1960). Productivity of American psychologists: Quantity versus quality. American Psychologist, 15, 310–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poincaré, H. (1921). The foundations of science: Science and hypothesis, the value of science, science and method (G. B. Halstead, Trans.). New York: Science Press.Google Scholar
Quételet, A. (1968). A treatise on man and the development of his faculties. New York: Franklin. (Reprint of 1842 Edinburgh translation of 1835 French original)Google Scholar
Raskin, E. A. (1936). Comparison of scientific and literary ability: A biographical study of eminent scientists and men of letters of the nineteenth century. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 31, 20–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Root-Bernstein, R. S., Bernstein, M., & Garnier, H. (1993). Identification of scientists making long-term, high-impact contributions, with notes on their methods of working. Creativity Research Journal, 6, 329–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrager, J., & Langley, P. (Eds.). (1990). Computational models of scientific discovery and theory formation. San Mateo, CA: Kaufmann.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1973). Does scientific discovery have a logic? Philosophy of Science, 40, 471–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1986). What we know about the creative process. In Kuhn, R. L. (Ed.), Frontiers in creative and innovative management (pp. 3–20). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1976). Biographical determinants of achieved eminence: A multivariate approach to the Cox data. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 218–226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simonton, D. K. (1977a). Creative productivity, age, and stress: A biographical time-series analysis of 10 classical composers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 791–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1977b). Eminence, creativity, and geographic marginality: A recursive structural equation model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 805–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1980a). Thematic fame and melodic originality in classical music: A multivariate computer-content analysis. Journal of Personality, 48, 206–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1980b). Thematic fame, melodic originality, and musical zeitgeist: A biographical and transhistorical content analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 972–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1983). Formal education, eminence, and dogmatism: The curvilinear relationship. Journal of Creative Behavior, 17, 149–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1984a). Artistic creativity and interpersonal relationships across and within generations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1273–1286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1984b). Creative productivity and age: A mathematical model based on a two-step cognitive process. Developmental Review, 4, 77–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1984c). Genius, creativity, and leadership: Historiometric inquiries. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1985). Quality, quantity, and age: The careers of 10 distinguished psychologists. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 21, 241–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1986). Biographical typicality, eminence, and achievement style. Journal of Creative Behavior, 20, 14–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1988). Age and outstanding achievement: What do we know after a century of research? Psychological Bulletin, 104, 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1989). Age and creative productivity: Nonlinear estimation of an information-processing model. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 29, 23–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simonton, D. K. (1991a). Career landmarks in science: Individual differences and interdisciplinary contrasts. Developmental Psychology, 27, 119–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1991b). Emergence and realization of genius: The lives and works of 120 classical composers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 829–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1992). Leaders of American psychology, 1879–1967: Career development, creative output, and professional achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1996). Creative expertise: A life-span developmental perspective. In Ericsson, K. A. (Ed.), The road to expert performance: Empirical evidence from the arts and sciences, sports, and games (pp. 227–253). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1997). Creative productivity: A predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks. Psychological Review, 104, 66–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1999a). Origins of genius: Darwinian perspectives on creativity. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1999b). Significant samples: The psychological study of eminent individuals. Psychological Methods, 4, 425–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2000). Creative development as acquired expertise: Theoretical issues and an empirical test. Developmental Review, 20, 283–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2002). Creativity. In Ekerdt, D. J. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of aging (pp. 290–293). New York: Macmillan Reference.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2003a). Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: The integration of product, process, and person perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 475–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2003b). Qualitative and quantitative analyses of historical data. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 617–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2004). Creativity in science: Chance, logic, genius, and zeitgeist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walberg, H. J., Rasher, S. P., & Parkerson, J. (1980). Childhood and eminence. Journal of Creative Behavior, 13, 225–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisberg, R. W. (1992). Creativity: Beyond the myth of genius. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
Weisberg, R. W. (1994). Genius and madness? A quasi-experimental test of the hypothesis that manic-depression increases creativity. Psychological Science, 5, 361–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, K. G., & White, M. J. (1978). On the relation between productivity and impact. Australian Psychologist, 13, 369–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zusne, L. (1976). Age and achievement in psychology: The harmonic mean as a model. American Psychologist, 31, 805–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×