Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-w95db Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-19T02:58:10.736Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

20 - Spores and pollen from the Crato Formation: biostratigraphic and palaeoenvironmental implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2009

David M. Martill
Affiliation:
University of Portsmouth
Günter Bechly
Affiliation:
Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde, Stuttgart
Robert F. Loveridge
Affiliation:
University of Portsmouth
David J. Batten
Affiliation:
School of Earth, Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
Get access

Summary

Well over 150 spore and pollen taxa have been recorded in the literature from the Crato Formation and other slightly older and younger formations in the Chapada do Araripe, but detailed information on stratigraphic occurrences and relative abundances is mostly lacking. As a result, it is difficult to draw precise biostratigraphic and palaeoenvironmental conclusions, and impossible to recognize any changes in climate and depositional conditions upwards through the succession on the basis of the published record of these plant microfossils. By a process of elimination it is reasonable to suggest an age range of late Aptian to early Albian for the formation from the data presented. It may also be inferred that during the time it accumulated much of the surrounding vegetation was adapted to semi-arid conditions, although there must also have been some habitats that were able to sustain moisture-loving and aquatic plants. The latter is emphasized by the palynological composition of two samples examined specifically for consideration in this chapter, which are unequivocally from the Crato Formation. The assemblages recovered also suggest that the formation is more likely to be late Aptian than early Albian in age. In addition, evidence of reworking of Devonian deposits is apparent. A few of the spores and pollen grains recovered are illustrated (Figure 20.1 and Plate 32).

Background

The great variety and exquisite preservation of insect, fish, plant and other macrofossil remains in the Crato Formation is not obviously matched by similarly abundant and well-preserved palynomorphs (plant microfossils), despite the large number of forms that have been recorded.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Crato Fossil Beds of Brazil
Window into an Ancient World
, pp. 566 - 574
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arai, M., Coimbra, J. C. and da Silva-Telles, Jr, A. C. 2001. Síntese bioestratigráfica da Basica do Araripe (Nordeste do Brasil), pp. 109–117. InBarros, L. M., Nuvens, P. C. and Filgueira, J. B. M. (eds), I e II Simpósios sobre a Bacia do Araripe e bacias interiores do nordeste. Departamento Nacional de Produção Mineral – 10ο Distrito, Universidade Regional do Cariri, Sociedade Brasileira de Paleontologia, Crato.
Batten, D. J. 1984. Palynology, climate, and the development of Late Cretaceous floral provinces in the Northern Hemisphere; a review, pp. 127–164. InBrenchley, P. J. (ed.), Fossils and Climate. Geological Journal, Special Issue11.
Batten, D. J. and , Li W. 1987. Aspects of palynomorph distribution, floral provinces and climate during the Cretaceous. Geologisches Jahrbuch A 96: 219–237.Google Scholar
Berthou, P.-Y., Depeche, F., , Colin J. P., Filgueira, J. B. M. and Teles, M. S. L. 1994. New data on the ostracodes from the Crato lithologic units (lower member of the Santana Formation, latest Aptian–Lower Albian) of the Araripe Basin (northeastern Brazil). Acta Geológica Leopoldensia 17: 539–554.Google Scholar
Brito, I. M. and Quadros, L. P. 1995. Retrabalhamento do Devoniano no Cretáceo Inferior da Bacia do Araripe. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 67: 493–496.Google Scholar
Coimbra, J. C., Arai, M. and Carreño, A. L. 2002. Biostratigraphy of Lower Cretaceous microfossils from the Araripe Basin, northeastern Brazil. Geobios 35: 687–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, P. and Maisey, J. G. 1991. Fossil plants, pp. 414–421, 424–425. InMaisey, J. G. (ed.), Santana Fossils: an Illustrated Atlas. Neptune City, NJ:T. F. H. Publications.
Dilcher, D. L., Bernardes-De-Oliveira, M. E., Pons, D. and Lott, T. A. 2005. Welwitschiaceae from the Lower Cretaceous of northeastern Brazil. American Journal of Botany 92: 1294–1310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doyle, J. A., Jardiné, S. and Doerenkamp, A. 1982. Afropollis, a new genus of early angiosperm pollen, with notes on the Cretaceous palynostratigraphy and paleoenvironments of northern Gondwana. Bulletin des Centres de Recherches Exploration-Production, Elf-Aquitaine 6: 39–117.Google Scholar
Herngreen, G. F. W. 1975. Palynology of middle and Upper Cretaceous strata in Brazil. Mededelingen Rijks Geologische Dienst, Nieuwe Serie 26: 39–91.Google Scholar
Herngreen, G. F. W.Herngren, G. F. W. 1998. Cretaceous sporomorph provinces and events in the equatorial region. Zentralblatt für Geologie und Paläontologie, Teil 1 1996: 1313–1323.Google Scholar
Herngren, G. F. W. and Chlonova, A. F. 1981 Cretaceous microfloral provinces. Pollen et Spores 23: 441–555.Google Scholar
Lima, M. R. 1978. Palinologia da Formação Santana (Cretáceo do nordeste do Brasil). Introduçao geologica e descrição sistemática dos esporos da subturma Azonotriletes. Ameghiniana 15: 333–365.Google Scholar
Lima, M. R. 1979. Palinologia da Formação Santana (Cretáceo do nordeste do Brasil). II. Descrição sistemática dos esporos da subturma Zonotriletes e turma Monoletes e dos polens das turmas Saccites e Aletes. Ameghiniana 16: 27–63.Google Scholar
Lima, M. R. 1980. Palinologia da Formação Santana (Cretáceo do nordeste do Brasil). III. Descrição sistemática dos polens da turma Plicates (subturma Costates). Ameghiniana 17: 15–47.Google Scholar
Lima, M. R. 1989. Palinologia da Formação Santana (Cretáceo do nordeste do Brasil). IV- Descrição sistemática dos polens das turmas Plicates e Poroses, esporos, incertae sedis e microplancton marinho. Ameghiniana 26: 63–81.Google Scholar
Lima, M. R. and Perinotto, J. A. J. 1984. Palinologia de sedimentos da parte superior da Formação Missão Velha, Bacia do Araripe. Geociências 3: 67–76.Google Scholar
Mohr, B. A. R. and Friis, E. M. 2000. Early angiosperms from the Lower Cretaceous Crato Formation (Brazil), a preliminary report. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161 (6 suppl.): S155–S167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, V. H., Borrego, A. G., Cabrera, L. and Dino, R. 2003. Organic matter composition and distribution through the Aptian–Albian lacustrine sequences of the Araripe Basin, northeastern Brazil. International Journal of Coal Geology 54: 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborn, J. M., Taylor, T. N. and Lima, M. R. 1993. The ultrastructure of fossil ephedroid pollen with gnetalean affinities from the Lower Cretaceous of Brazil. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 77: 171–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pons, D., Berthou, P.-Y. and Campos, D. de A. 1990. Quelques observations sur la palynologie de l'Aptien supérieur et de l'Albien du Bassin d'Araripe, pp. 241–252. InCampos, D. de A., Viana, M. S. S., Brito, P. M. and Beurlen, G. (eds), Atas do I Simpósio sobre a Bacia do Araripe e bacias interiores do nordeste, Crato, 14 a 16 de junho de 1990. Crato.
—,Pons, D., P.-Y. Berthou Berthou, P.-Y. Filgueira, J. B. M. and Sampaio, J. J. A. 1996. Palynologie des unités lithostratigraphique “Fundao”, “Crato” et “Ipubi” (Aptien supérieur à Albien inférieur–moyen, Bassin d'Araripe, NE du Brésil): enseignements paléoécologiques, stratigraphiques et climatologiques, pp. 383–401. InJardiné, S., Klasz, I. and Debenet, J.-P. (eds), Géologie de l'Afrique et de l'Antique Sud. Compte-Rendu des colloques de Géologie d'Angers, 16–20 July 1994, Elf Aquitaine Mémoire16.Google Scholar
Regali, M. S. P. 1989. Tucanopollis, um gênero novo das angiospermas primitivas. Boletim de Geociências da Petrobrás 3: 395–402.Google Scholar
Regali, M. S. P. 2001. Palinoestratigrafia dos sedimentos Cretácicos da Bacia do Araripe e das bacias interiores do nordeste – Brasil, pp. 101–108. InBarros, L. M., Nuvens, P. C. and Filgueira, J. B. M. (eds), I e II Simpósios sobre a Bacia do Araripe e bacias interiores do nordeste. Departamento Nacional de Produção Mineral – 10ο Distrito, Universidade Regional do Cariri, Sociedade Brasileira de Paleontologia, Crato.
Regali, M. S. P. and Viana, C. F. 1989. Sedimentos do Neojurássico–Eocretáceo do Brasil: idade e correlação com a escala internacional. Petrobrás, Rio de Janeiro: 1–45 [Portuguese]; 47–91 [English translation].Google Scholar
Rydin, C., Mohr, B. and Friis, E. M. 2003. Cratonia cotyledon gen. et sp. nov.: a unique Cretaceous seedling related to Welwitschia. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 270 (suppl.): S29–S32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rydin, C.,Rydin, C.Pedersen, K. R. and Friis, E. M. 2004. On the evolutionary history of Ephedra: Cretaceous fossils and extant molecules. Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesUSA 101: 16571–16576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×