Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2015
  • Online publication date: December 2015

6 - Obstetrics for the anaesthetist

from Section 2 - Obstetric aspects

Summary

Intrapartum care at or near term gestation

Intrapartum care is a challenging and rapidly changing environment for all health professionals. As an obstetrician the key question is often ‘Do I need to intervene? And if so, how much time do I have to do this?’ Fetal monitoring, recommendation of mode and timing of delivery is aimed at reducing poor neonatal outcomes.

Within the scope of this chapter it is not possible to cover all potential intrapartum events that may require anaesthetic assessment and input. The aim of this chapter is to provide enough information on fetal monitoring to enable the anaesthetist to understand the urgency of a delivery and how this is determined in high-risk cases such as twins and vaginal breech delivery.

Intrapartum fetal monitoring

Intrapartum fetal monitoring techniques have enabled obstetricians to intervene and prevent the development of a severe hypoxia. However, these techniques are far from perfect. The mainstay of fetal intrapartum monitoring remains the cardiotocograph (CTG), which records the fetal heart rate (FHR) and the presence of uterine contraction activity using the tocograph. This is recommended by NICE for all ‘high-risk’ labours. Although not exhaustive, indications for continuous intrapartum CTG monitoring are listed below:

  1. • Meconium-stained liquor

  2. • Abnormal FHR detected by intermittent auscultation

  3. • Maternal pyrexia of 38 °C on one occasion or 37.5°C on two occasions, 2 hours apart

  4. • Fresh bleeding developing in labour

  5. • Oxytocin use for augmentation

  6. • Multiple pregnancy

  7. • Vaginal breech delivery

  8. • Maternal request

  9. • Fetal growth restriction

  10. • Preterm labour

  11. • Maternal disease (pre-eclampsia, obstetric cholestasis).

The evidence for these recommendations is derived from observational studies rather than randomized controlled trials. The poor quality of these studies, which were performed more than 20 years ago, has resulted in a lack of evidence for CTG use in low-risk women. Therefore although it might seem counterintuitive to the anaesthetist to reduce the amount of monitoring information available to doctors and midwives caring for women in labour, current NICE guidance does not support the use of CTG in this group. A Cochrane review on continuous CTG during labour demonstrated a reduction in neonatal seizures, but no significant differences in cerebral palsy or infant mortality rates. This was offset by increases in caesarean section and instrumental vaginal birth rates.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Alfirevic, Z., Devane, D. and Gyte, G. M. L. (2013). Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour (Review). Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., 2013(5), Art. No. CD006066.
Armstrong, L. and Stenson, B. J. (2007). Use of umbilical cord blood gas analysis in the assessment of the newborn. Arch. Dis. Child Fetal Neonatal Ed., 92(6), F430–F434.
Barrett, J., Hannah, M., Hutton, E. et al. (2013). A randomized trial of planned caesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy. New Engl. J. Med. 369 (14), 1295–1305.
Hannah, M. E., Hannah, W. J., Hewson, S. A. et al. (2000). Planned caesarean section versus vaginal birth at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 356, 1375–1383.
National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (2011). Caesarean Section. CG132. 32–35.
National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (2007). Intrapartum care. CG55. 44–48.
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (2006). The Management of Breech Presentation. Green-top guideline No. 20b. London: RCOG Press.
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (2011). Operative Vaginal Delivery. Green-top Guideline 26. London: RCOG Press.
Shah, D. (2013) Clinical Progress in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers.
Smith, G. C., Pell, J. P. and Dobbie, R. (2002). Birth order, gestational age and risk of delivery related perinatal death in twins: retrospective cohort study. BMJ 325, 1004–1008.
Thomas, J., Paranjothy, S. and James, D. (2004). National cross sectional survey to determine whether the decision to delivery interval is critical in emergency caesarean section. BMJ 328, 665.
Tuffnell, D. J., Wilkinson, K. and Beresford, N. (2001). Interval between decision and delivery by caesarean section: are current standards achievable? Observational case series. BMJ 322, 1330.