Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T03:49:35.311Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Commentary: How Did We Get into this Mess?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Peter A. Ubel
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
Don A. Moore
Affiliation:
Carnegie Mellon University, Pennsylvania
Daylian M. Cain
Affiliation:
Carnegie Mellon University, Pennsylvania
George Loewenstein
Affiliation:
Carnegie Mellon University, Pennsylvania
Max H. Bazerman
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

I have been aware of the close ties between physicians and the pharmaceutical industry since the day I began medical school in 1984 and received a free stethoscope from a kind-hearted pharmaceutical company. Later that year, I received an expensive medical school textbook from another company, and, over the next several years, I ate more than a few donuts provided by sales representatives who set up meeting areas within the hospital at which I was training. When I left medical school and began residency training, I began to realize that some people thought it was inappropriate for doctors to get too cozy with the pharmaceutical industry. The Mayo Clinic, where I trained, banned pharmaceutical representatives from its grounds, to reduce industry influence on its physicians. In response to this policy, pharmaceutical representatives from several companies got together and rented a large hall in a hotel across the street from the clinic, where they provided food and conversation to Mayo Clinic physicians every week; we all, staff and trainees alike, gladly trudged across the cold Minnesota streets to receive free food and copies of important research articles that the sales representatives thought we should know about.

It is safe to say, then, that I have been aware of the close ties between physicians and industry for a long time. But until reading Dr. Kassirer's disturbing summary, I was unaware of the thoroughness of the pharmaceutical marketing network.

Type
Chapter
Information
Conflicts of Interest
Challenges and Solutions in Business, Law, Medicine, and Public Policy
, pp. 142 - 151
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asch, D. A., Jepson, C.. (2003). When money is saved by reducing healthcare costs, where do US primary care physicians think the money goes?American Journal of Managed Care 9(6), 438–442Google ScholarPubMed
Avorn, J., Chen, et al M.. (1982). Scientific versus commercial sources of influence on the prescribing behavior of physicians. American Journal of Medicine 73(1), 4–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Backer, E. L., Lebsack, J. A.. (2000). The value of pharmaceutical representative visits and medication samples in community-based family practices. Journal of Family Practice 49(9), 811–816Google ScholarPubMed
Bowman, M. A. (1986). The impact of drug company funding on the content of continuing medical education. Mobius 6, 66–69Google Scholar
Bowman, M. A., & Pearle, D. L. (1988). Changes in drug prescribing patterns related to commercial company funding of continuing medical education. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions 8(1), 13–20CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caudill, T. S., Johnson, M. S.. (1996). Physicians, pharmaceutical sales representatives, and the cost of prescribing. Archives of Family Medicine 5(4), 201–206CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chew, L. D., O'Young, T. S.. (2000). A physician survey of the effect of drug sample availability on physicians' behavior. Journal of General Internal Medicine 15(7), 478–483CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chren, M. M., & Landefeld, C. S. (1994). Physicians' behavior and their interactions with drug companies: A controlled study of physicians who requested additions to a hospital drug formulary. Journal of the American Medical Association 271(9), 684–689CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dana, J., & Loewenstein, G. (2003). A social science perspective on gifts to physicians from industry. American Medical Association 290(2), 252–255CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hansson, L., Hedner, T.. (2000). Randomised trial of effects of calcium antagonists compared with diuretics and beta-blockers on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertension: The Nordic Diltiazem (NORDIL) study. Lancet 356(9227), 359–365CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loewenstein, G. (1992). The fall and rise of psychological explanations in the economics of intertemporal choice. Choice over time. G. Loewenstein & J. Elster (Eds.). New York, The Russell Sage Foundation: 3–34
Lurie, N., Rich, E. C.. (1990). Pharmaceutical representatives in academic medical centers: Interaction with faculty and housestaff. Journal of General Internal Medicine 5(3), 240–243CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Materson, B. J., Reda, D. J.. (1993). Single-drug therapy for hypertension in men. A comparison of six antihypertensive agents with placebo: The Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Antihypertensive Agents. New England Journal of Medicine 328(13), 914–921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinney, W. P., Schiedermayer, D. L.. (1990). Attitudes of internal medicine faculty and residents toward professional interaction with pharmaceutical sales representatives. Journal of the American Medical Association 264(13), 1693–1697CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neaton, J. D., Grimm, Jr., R. H.. (1993). Treatment of mild hypertension study, final results. Treatment of mild hypertension study research group. Journal of the American Medical Association 270(6), 713–724CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siegel, D., & Lopez, J. (1997). Trends in antihypertensive drug use in the United States: do the JNC V recommendations affect prescribing? Fifth Joint National Commission on the Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Journal of the American Medical Association 278(21), 1745–1748CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ubel, P. A. (2000). Pricing life: Why it's time for health care rationing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Ubel, P. A., Jepson, C.. (2003). The influence of cost-effectiveness information on physicians' cancer screening recommendations. Social Science & Medicine 56, 1727–1736CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ubel, P. A., Jepson, C., et al. (2003). Misperceptions about beta blockers and diuretics: Are they related to the provision of free drug samples? Journal of General Internal Medicine
Ubel, P. A., Jepson, C.. (2003). Don't ask, don't tell: A change in medical student attitudes after obstetrics/gynecology clerkships toward seeking consent for pelvic examinations on an anesthetized patient. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 188(2), 575–579CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×