Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T00:19:54.343Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Designing and facilitating consensus-building – keys to success

from Part III - Approaches to managing conflicts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

Diana Pound
Affiliation:
Dialogue Matters
Stephen M. Redpath
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen
R. J. Gutiérrez
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Kevin A. Wood
Affiliation:
Bournemouth University
Juliette C. Young
Affiliation:
NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, UK
Get access

Summary

I am writing this chapter as someone who has designed and facilitated over 70 stakeholder processes, reviewed others, conducted research on best practice (e.g. Pound, 2009) and trained and learnt from the experiences of over 1000 people. I do this through Dialogue Matters, established in 2000 to focus on dialogue about the environment. We work from local to international scales, low to high levels of tension, and between sectors and cultures. Our work includes conflict resolution between resource users, between users and conservationists, and also topic-based dialogue where the science and policy is contested (e.g. climate change, global water futures and solutions, sustainable fishing practice, managing bovine tuberculosis (TB) in cattle and badgers).

Our approach continues to evolve but is rooted in Consensus-building, more often now called Stakeholder Dialogue. This has particular ethics and design principles which set it apart from other participatory approaches. It involves a group of stakeholders in a face-to-face and principled negotiation process, designed for the situation and comprising a staged sequence of deliberative workshops and other activities. In our own work, to maximise the benefits of the process and the number that can be involved, our professional team train, lead and work alongside volunteer small group facilitators.

In this chapter I describe 12 keys to success related to consensus-building. I use ‘tension’ rather than ‘conflict’ because there is a gradation from low tension (parties recognise different perspectives but are willing to cooperate) to full conflict (parties are polarised, have no direct contact and the conflict is escalating). ‘Sponsoring bodies’ are organisations (e.g. government agencies, NGOs or partnerships) that provide the resources for a stakeholder process. Their motivation may be compliance with statutory requirements, a principled commitment to participation or, most likely, because they want well-informed decisions that have greater support and are easier to implement. ‘Projects’ are the people and enterprise put together to achieve a particular aim. Projects may sit within larger organisations that are the sponsoring body, or be a partnership between organisations and be the sponsoring body.

Type
Chapter
Information
Conflicts in Conservation
Navigating Towards Solutions
, pp. 240 - 256
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnstein, A. (1969). A ladder of citizenship participation. J. Am. Inst. Planners, 26, 216–233.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (2007). Impeding ecological sustainability through selective moral disengagement. Int. J. Innov. Sustain. Dev., 2, 8–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brisbane Declaration. (2005). The United Nations Brisbane Declaration on Community Engagement. Brisbane, August 2005. International Conference on Engaging Communities. http://www.iap2.org.au/sitebuilder/resources/knowledge/asset/files/37/unbrisbanedeclarationcommunityengagement.pdf
Buddery, P. and Shafique, A. (2013). Environmental Protection and Management – A Social Productivity Approach for SEPA and SNH. London: RSA 2020 Public Services.Google Scholar
Bushe, G. R. (2011). Appreciative inquiry: theory and critique. In The Routledge Companion to Organizational Change, eds. Boje, D., Burnes, B. and Hassard, J., pp. 87–103. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Douglas, K. (2011). Decision time: how you make up your mind. New Sci., 212(2838), 38–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gladwell, M. (2005). Blink – The Power of Thinking without Thinking. New York, NY: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Hammerstein, P. and Stevens, J. R. (2012). Evolution and the Mechanisms of Decision Making. Ernst Strüngmann Forum Report (vol. 11). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, T. and Scoones, I. (2000). Participatory Environmental Policy Processes: Experiences from North and South. Institute for Developmental Studies Working Paper 113. Brighton: University of Sussex, Institute for Development Studies.Google Scholar
NRC. (2008). Public Participation in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Pound, D. (2004a). Stakeholder Dialogue – A Good Practice Guide for Users – Including ‘Making the Most of the Islands’ An Example from the Isles of Scilly. Bristol: Countryside Agency.Google Scholar
Pound, D. (2004b). From conflict to cooperation: Thanet Coast and Natura 2000. In Achieving Environmental Objectives, The Role and Value of Communication, Education, Participation and Awareness (CEPA) in Conventions and Agreements in Europe, eds. Martin-Mehers, G., Hamu, D., Auchincloss, E. and Goldstein, W., pp. 122. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN Commission on Education and Communications.Google Scholar
Pound, D. (2006). The Nature of Our Coast: Helping People and Wildlife Thrive: NE Kent European Marine Site Management Scheme Review. Peterborough: English Nature.Google Scholar
Pound, D. (2009). Adopting Effective Stakeholder Engagement Processes to Deliver Regional Marine Protected Area (MPA) Network. Natural England Commissioned Report, Number 008. Peterborough: Natural England.Google Scholar
Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biol. Conserv., 141, 2417–2431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, M. S., et al. (2009). Who's in and why? Stakeholder analysis as a prerequisite for sustainable natural resource management. J. Environ. Manage., 90, 1933–1949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Studd, K. (2002). An introduction to deliberative methods of stakeholder and public participation. English Nature Research Reports474. Peterborough: English Nature.Google Scholar
Sutton, R., Douglas, K. and Murphy, A. (2012). Engaging Communities in Climate Change and Adaptation Measures. A Review of Relevant Psychological Science. University of Kent: CC2150 InterReg Project.Google Scholar
Van Boven, G. and Hesselink, F. (2003). Conservation Results by Managing Change, The Role of Communication, Education and Public Awareness. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN Commission on Education and Communication.Google Scholar
Warburton, D. (1997). Participatory Action in the Countryside – A Literature Review. Cheltenham: Countryside Commission.Google Scholar
Yuliani, E. L., Adnan, H. and Indriatmoko, Y. (2008). The Use of Appreciative Inquiry as a Tool for Enhancing Adaptive Capacity in Natural Resources Management. Cheltenham: IASC Conference.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×