Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T21:55:25.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Fronthaul Compression in C-RANs

from Part II - Physical-Layer Design in C-RANs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2017

Tony Q. S. Quek
Affiliation:
Singapore University of Technology and Design
Mugen Peng
Affiliation:
Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
Osvaldo Simeone
Affiliation:
New Jersey Institute of Technology
Wei Yu
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The C-RAN architecture relies on fronthaul links to connect each remote radio head (RRH) to the managing baseband unit (BBU). In particular, for the uplink, the fronthaul links allow the RRHs to convey their respective received signals, either in analog format or in the form of digitized baseband samples, to the BBU. For the downlink, the BBU transfers the radio signal that each RRH is to transmit on the radio interface, in analog or digital format, on the fronthaul links to the RRHs. It is this transfer of radio or baseband signals that makes possible the virtualization of the baseband and higherlayer functions of the (RRHs) at the BBU, which defines the C-RAN architecture. The analog transport solution is typically implemented by means of radio-over-fiber (see, e.g., [1]) but solutions based on copper LAN cables are also available [2]. In contrast, the digital transmission of baseband, or IQ, samples is currently carried out by following the common public radio interface (CPRI) specification [3]. This ideally requires fiber optic fronthaul links, although practical constraints motivate the development of wireless-based digital fronthauling [4]. The digital approach seems to have attracted the most interest owing to the traditional advantages of digital solutions, their including resilience to noise and to hardware impairments as well as flexibility in the transport options (see, e.g., [5]). Furthermore, the connection between an RRH and the BBU may be direct, i.e., single-hop, or it may take place over a cascade of fronthaul links, i.e., be multi-hop, as illustrated in Fig. 8.1.

In this chapter we provide an overview of the state of the art on the problem of transporting digitized IQ baseband signals on the fronthaul links. As mentioned, the current de facto standard that defines analog-to-digital processing and transport options is provided by the common public radio interface (CPRI) specification [3]. This specification is widely understood to be unsuitable for the large-scale implementation of C-RAN owing to its significant fronthaul bit rate requirements under common operating conditions. As an example, as reported in [5], the bit rate needed for an LTE base station that serves three cell sectors with carrier aggregation over five carriers and two receive antennas exceeds even the 10 Gbits/s provided by standard fiber optic links.

Type
Chapter
Information
Cloud Radio Access Networks
Principles, Technologies, and Applications
, pp. 179 - 199
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Al-Raweshidy, H. and Komaki, S., Radio over Fiber Technologies for Mobile Communications Networks, Artech House, 2002.
Lu, C., Almeida, H., Trojer, E., Laraqui, K., Berg, M., Tidblad, O. V., “Connecting the dots: small cells shape up for high-performance indoor radio,” Ericsson Review, December 2014.Google Scholar
Ericsson AB, Huawei Technologies, NEC Corporation, Alcatel Lucent, and Nokia Siemens Networks, “Common public radio interface (CPRI); interface specification,” CPRI specification v5.0, September 2011.
Fujitsu, “The benefits of cloud-RAN architecture in mobile network expansion,” White Paper, 2015.
Checko, A., Christiansen, H. L., Yan, Y., Scolari, L., Kardaras, G., Berger, M. S., “Cloud RAN for mobile networks – a technology overview,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tutorials, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 405–426, first quarter 2015.Google Scholar
Dotsch, U., Doll, M., Mayer, H. P., Schaich, F., Segel, J., and Sehier, P., “Quantitative analysis of split base station processing and determination of advantageous architectures for LTE,” Bell Labs. Technical J., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 105–128, September 2013.Google Scholar
Samardzija, D., Pastalan, J., MacDonald, M., Walker, S., and Valenzuela, R., “Compressed transport of baseband signals in radio access networks,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 3216–3225, 2012.Google Scholar
Guo, B., Cao, W., Tao, A., and Samardzija, D., “LTE/LTE-A signal compression on the cpri interface,” Bell Labs. Technical J., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 117–133, 2013.Google Scholar
Nieman, K. F., and Evans, B. L., “Time-domain compression of complex-baseband lte signals for cloud radio access networks,” in Proc. IEEE Glob. Conf. on Signaling and Information Processing, December 2013, pp. 1198–1201,Google Scholar
Vosoughi, M. W. A. and Cavallaro, J. R., “Baseband signal compression in wireless base stations,” in Proc. IEEE Glob. Comm. Conf., December 2012.Google Scholar
Wubben, D., Rost, P., Bartelt, J., Lalam, M., Savin, V., Gorgoglione, M. ., “Benefits and impact of cloud computing on 5G signal processing: flexible centralization through cloud-RAN,” IEEE Signal Process Mag., vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 35–44, November 2014.Google Scholar
Liu, J., Xu, S., Zhou, S., and Niu, Z., “Redesigning fronthaul for next-generation networks: beyond baseband samples and point-to-point links,” ArXiv e-prints, August 2015.
Lorca, J. and Cucala, L., “Lossless compression technique for the fronthaul of lte/lte-advanced cloud-RAN architectures,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks, June 2013.Google Scholar
Grieger, S. B. S. and Fettweis, G., “Large scale field trial results on frequency domain compression for uplink joint detection,” in Proc. IEEE Glob. Communication Conf., December 2012.Google Scholar
Gamal, A. E., and Kim, Y.-H., Network Information Theory. Cambridge University Press, 2011.
Sanderovich, A., Somekh, O., Poor, H. V., and Shamai, S., “Uplink macro diversity of limited backhaul cellular network,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 3457–3478, August 2009.Google Scholar
Sanderovich, A., Shamai, S., and Steinberg, Y., “Distributed MIMO receiver – achievable rates and upper bounds,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 55, no. 10, pp. 4419–4438, October 2009.Google Scholar
del Coso, A. and Simoens, S., “Distributed compression for MIMO coordinated networks with a backhaul constraint,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 4698–4709, September 2009.Google Scholar
Park, S.-H., Simeone, O., Sahin, O., and Shamai, S., “Robust and efficient distributed compression for cloud radio access networks,” IEEE Trans. on Veh. Technol., vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 692–703, February 2013.Google Scholar
Zhou, L. and Yu, W., “Uplink multicell processing with limited backhaul via per-base-station successive interference cancellation,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 2246–2254, October 2013.Google Scholar
Park, S.-H., Simeone, O., Sahin, O., and Shamai, S., “Fronthaul compression for cloud radio access networks,” IEEE Signal Proc. Mag., Special Issue on Signal Processing for the 5G Revolution, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 69–79, November 2014.Google Scholar
Wyner, A. D., and Ziv, J., “The rate-distortion function for source coding with side information at the decoder,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–10, January 1976.Google Scholar
Saxena, A., Nayak, J., and Rose, K., “On efficient quantizer design for robust distributed source coding,” in Proc. Data Compression Conf., 2006, IEEE, 2006, pp. 63–72.
Liu, Z., Cheng, S., Liveris, A. D., and Xiong, Z., “Slepian-wolf coded nested lattice quantization for Wyner-Ziv coding: High-rate performance analysis and code design,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 52, no. 10, pp. 4358–4379, October 2006.Google Scholar
Aaron, A. and Girod, B., “Compression with side information using turbo codes,” Proc. IEEE Data Compression Conf., April 2002.Google Scholar
Pradhan, S. S., and Ramchandran, K., “Distributed source coding using syndromes (DISCUS): design and construction,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 626–643, March 2010.Google Scholar
Korada, S. B., and Urbanke, R. L., “Polar codes are optimal for lossy source coding,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 1751–1768, April 2010.Google Scholar
Martinian, E. and Wainwright, M. J., “Analysis of LDGM and compound codes for lossy compression and binning.” Available at arXiv:0602.046.
Park, S.-H., Simeone, O., Sahin, O., and Shamai, S., “Joint decompression and decoding for cloud radio access networks,” IEEE Signal Process Lett., vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 503–506, May 2013.Google Scholar
Simeone, O., Levy, N., Sanderovich, A., Somekh, O., Zaidel, B. M., Poor, H. V., “Cooperative wireless cellular systems: an information-theoretic view,” Found. Trends Commun. Inf. Theory, 2011.Google Scholar
“3GPP tr 36.931 ver. 9.0.0 rel. 9,” no. 6, May 2011.
Park, S.-H., Simeone, O., Sahin, O., and Shamai, S., “Performance evaluation of multiterminal backhaul compression for cloud radio access networks,” in Proc. Conf. on Inf. Science and Systems, March 2014.Google Scholar
Irmer, R., Droste, H., March, P., Grieger, M., Fettweis, G., S. Brueck “Coordinated multipoint: concepts, performance, and field trial results,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 102–111, February 2011.Google Scholar
Park, S.-H., Simeone, O., Sahin, O., and Shamai, S., “Joint precoding and multivariate backhaul compression for the downlink of cloud radio access networks,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process, vol. 61, no. 22, pp. 5646–5658, November 2013.Google Scholar
Park, S.-H., Simeone, O., Sahin, O., and Shamai, S., “Multihop backhaul compression for the uplink of cloud radio access networks,” Available at arXiv:1312.7135.
Nazer, B. and Gastpar, M., “Compute-and-forward: harnessing interference through structured codes,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 57, no. 10, pp. 6463–6486, October 2011.Google Scholar
Hong, S.-N. and Caire, G., “Compute-and-forward strategies for cooperative distributed antenna systems,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 59, no. 9, pp. 5227–5243, September 2013.Google Scholar
Liu, N. and Kang, W., “A new achievability scheme for downlink multicell processing with finite backhaul capacity,” in Proc. 2014 IEEE Int. Symp. Information Theory, pp. 1006–1010.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×