Book contents
- Christianity and the Laws of Conscience
- Law and Christianity
- Christianity and the Laws of Conscience
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Themes in Understandings of Conscience in Christianity
- Part II Conscience According to Major Figures and Traditions
- Part III Applied Topics in Law and Conscience
- Index
- References
Part I - Themes in Understandings of Conscience in Christianity
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 June 2021
Book contents
- Christianity and the Laws of Conscience
- Law and Christianity
- Christianity and the Laws of Conscience
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Themes in Understandings of Conscience in Christianity
- Part II Conscience According to Major Figures and Traditions
- Part III Applied Topics in Law and Conscience
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Christianity and the Laws of ConscienceAn Introduction, pp. 21 - 90Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Recommended Reading
Barrett, C. K. “Paul and the Introspective Conscience.” In The Bible, the Reformation and the Church. Journal for the Study of the New Testament Supplement Series 105, edited by Stephens, W. P., 36–48. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 1995.Google Scholar
Colwell, John E. “Baptism, Conscience and the Resurrection: A Reappraisal of 1 Peter 3:21.” In Baptism, the New Testament and the Church. Journal for the Study of the New Testament Supplement Series 171, edited by Porter, Stanley E. and Cross, Anthony R., 210–27. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic.Google Scholar
Conn, Walter E. Conscience: Development and Self-Transcendence. Birmingham, al: Religious Education Press. 1981.Google Scholar
Gooch, Paul W. “‘Conscience’ in 1 Corinthians 8 and 10.” New Testament Studies 33 (1987): 244–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gooch, Paul W. “Conscience.” In New Interpreter’s Dictionary of the Bible, vol. 1, edited by Sakenfeld, Katharine D. et al., 719–26. Nashville, tn: Abingdon, 2006.Google Scholar
Harris, Bruce F. “SYNEIDHSIS (Conscience) in the Pauline Writings.” Westminster Theological Journal 24 (1961–62): 173–86.Google Scholar
McGaughey, Terence. “Conscience and Decision Making in Some Early Christian Communities.” Irish Biblical Studies 5 (1983): 115–31.Google Scholar
Maurer, Christian. “συνοίδα, συνείδησις.” In Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, vol. 7, edited by Friedrich, Gerhard. Translated and edited by Bromiley, Geoffrey W., 898–919. Grand Rapids, mi: Eerdmans, 1971.Google Scholar
Packer, James. “Situations and Principles: Conscience, Choice and Character.” In Law, Morality and the Bible: A Symposium, edited by Kaye, Bruce and Wenham, Gordon. Downers Grove, il: InterVarsity Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Pierce, C. A. Conscience in the New Testament. Studies in Biblical Theology 15. London: SCM, 1955.Google Scholar
Reicke, Bo. “Syneidesis in Rom 2:15.” Theologische Zeitschrift 12, no. 2 (1956): 157–61.Google Scholar
Selby, Gary. “The Meaning and Function of συνείδησις in Hebrews 9 and 10.” Restoration Quarterly 29 (1986): 145–54.Google Scholar
Stendahl, Krister. “Paul and the Introspective Conscience of the West.” Harvard Theological Review 56 (1963): 199–215. Reprinted in Stendahl, Krister. Paul among Jews and Gentiles. Minneapolis, mn: Fortress, 1976.Google Scholar
Thrall, Margaret E. “The Pauline Use of SYNDEIDHSIS.” New Testament Studies 14 (1968): 118–25.Google Scholar
Willis, Wendell Lee. Idol Meat in Corinth. Society of Biblical Literature Dissertation Series 68. Chico, ca: Scholars’ Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Recommended Reading
Barton, John. Understanding Old Testament Ethics: Approaches and Explorations. Louisville, ky: Westminster John Knox, 2003.Google Scholar
Berkman, John, and Mattison, William C. III, eds. Searching for a Universal Ethic: Multidisciplinary, Ecumenical, and Interfaith Responses to the Catholic Natural Law Tradition. Grand Rapids, mi: Eerdmans, 2014.Google Scholar
Bockmuehl, Markus. Jewish Law in Gentile Churches: Halakhah and the Beginning of Christian Public Ethics. Grand Rapids, mi: Baker Academic, 2003.Google Scholar
Budziszewski, J. The Line through the Heart: Natural Law As Fact, Theory, and Sign of Contradiction. Wilmington, de: ISI, 2009.Google Scholar
Burnside, Jonathan. God, Justice, and Society: Aspects of Law and Legality in the Bible. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Charles, J. Daryl. Retrieving the Natural Law: A Return to Moral First Things. Grand Rapids, mi: Eerdmans, 2008.Google Scholar
Hittinger, Russell. The First Grace: Rediscovering the Natural Law in a Post-Christian World. Wilmington, de: ISI, 2003.Google Scholar
Levering, Matthew. Biblical Natural Law: A Theocentric and Teleological Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanDrunen, David. Divine Covenants and Moral Order: A Biblical Theology of Natural Law. Grand Rapids, mi: Eerdmans, 2014.Google Scholar
Recommended Reading
Hausherr, I. Penthos: The Doctrine of Compunction in the Christian East. Cistercian Studies Series 53. Kalamazoo, mi: Cistercian Publications, 1982.Google Scholar
Maurer, Christian. ‘Synoida-Syneidesis’. In Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, vol. 7. Edited by Friedrich, Gernard. Translated and edited by Bromiley, Geoffrey W., 898–919. Grand Rapids, mi: Eerdmans, 1971.Google Scholar
McGuckin, John A. ‘Exegesis and Metaphysics in Origen’s Biblical Philosophy’. In Seeing the Glory, Collected Studies of John A. McGuckin, vol. 2, 159–74. Yonkers, ny: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2017.Google Scholar
McGuckin, John A. The Westminster Handbook to Origen. Louisville, ky: Westminster John Knox, 2004.Google Scholar
Pierce, C.A. Conscience in the New Testament. Studies in Biblical Theology 15. London: SCM Press, 1955.Google Scholar
Torre, Chiara. ‘Seneca and the Christian Tradition’. In The Cambridge Companion to Seneca, edited by Bartsch, Shadi and Schiesaro, Alessandro, 266–76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Recommended Reading
Alszeghy, Z. “The Sensus Fidei and the Development of Dogma.” In Vatican II: Assessment and Perspectives Twenty-Five Years After (1962–1987), vol. 1, edited by Latourelle, René, 138–56. New York, ny: Paulist Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Angelini, Giuseppe. “The Sensus Fidelium and Moral Discernment.” In Catholic Theological Ethics in the World Church, edited by Keenan, James F., 202–9. New York, ny: Continuum, 2007.Google Scholar
Burkhard, John J. “Sensus fidei: Meaning, Role and Future of a Teaching of Vatican II,” Louvain Studies 17 (1992): 18–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkhard, John J. “Sensus fidei: Theological Reflection since Vatican II.” Heythrop Journal 34 (1993): 41–59, 123–36.Google Scholar
Burkhard, John J. “Sensus Fidei: Recent Theological Reflection (1990–2001): Part I.” Heythrop Journal 46 (2005): 450–75.Google Scholar
Burkhard, John J. “Sensus Fidei: Recent Theological Reflection (1990–2001): Part II.” Heythrop Journal 47 (2006): 38–54.Google Scholar
Congar, OP, Yves. Lay People in the Church: A Study for a Theology of Laity. Translated by Attwater, Donald. Westminster, md: The Newman Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Instruction on the Ecclesial Vocation of the Theologian (Donum Veritatis). 1990.Google Scholar
Curran, Charles E., and Fullam, Lisa A.. The Sensus Fidelium and Moral Theology. Readings in Moral Theology 18. New York, ny: Paulist Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Ekpo, Anthony. “The Sensus Fidelium and the Threefold Office of Christ: A Reinterpretation of Lumen Gentium No. 12.” Theological Studies 76, no. 2 (2015): 330–46.Google Scholar
Newman, John Henry. On Consulting the Faithful in Matters of Doctrine. New York, ny: Sheed & Ward, 1961.Google Scholar
Rush, Ormond. “Sensus Fidei: Faith ‘Making Sense’ of Revelation,” Theological Studies 62 (2001): 231–61.Google Scholar
Thompson, W. M. “Sensus Fidelium and Infallibility.” American Ecclesiastical Review 167 (1973): 450–86.Google Scholar