Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-jbjwg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-19T20:41:20.054Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2015

Neil Smith
Affiliation:
University College London
Nicholas Allott
Affiliation:
Universitetet i Oslo
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Chomsky
Ideas and Ideals
, pp. 394 - 446
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aarts, Bas (2004) “Conceptions of gradience in the history of linguistics.” Language Sciences 26: 361–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abele, Robert (2011) “Noam Chomsky's theory of justice.” In Chatterjee, Deen K. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Global Justice. Dordrecht, Springer. 125–126.Google Scholar
Achbar, Mark (ed.) (1994) Manufacturing Consent: Noam Chomsky and the Media. London, Black Rose Books.Google Scholar
Adger, David (2003) Core Syntax: A Minimalist Approach. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Adger, David (2013) “Constructions and grammatical explanation: comments on Goldberg.” Mind & Language 28(4): 466–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adger, David, de Cat, Cécile & Tsoulas, George (eds.) (2004) Peripheries: Syntactic Edges and their Effects. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adger, David, Harbour, Daniel & Watkins, Laurel J. (2009) Mirrors and Microparameters: Phrase Structure Beyond Free Word Order. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albert, Michael (2000) Moving Forward: Programme for a Participatory Economy. San Francisco, CA, AK.Google Scholar
Albert, Michael (2011) “Querying young Chomsky.” The New Significance, November 7, 2011.
Albert, Michael & Hahnel, Robin (1991) The Political Economy of Participatory Economics. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Allott, Nicholas (2008) Pragmatics and Rationality. PhD thesis, University of London.
Allott, Nicholas (2010) Key Terms in Pragmatics. London, Continuum.Google Scholar
Allott, Nicholas & Shaer, Ben (2013) “Some linguistic properties of legal notices.” Canadian Journal of Linguistics 58(1): 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Mutairi, Fahad (2014) The Minimalist Program: the Nature and Plausibility of Chomsky's Biolinguistics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alperovitz, Gar (2005) America Beyond Capitalism: Reclaiming Our Wealth, Our Liberty, and Our Democracy. Hoboken, NJ, J. Wiley.Google Scholar
Alperovitz, Gar (2013) What Then Must We Do? Straight Talk About the Next American Revolution. White River Junction, VT, Chelsea Green.Google Scholar
Altmann, Gerald (1998) “Ambiguity in sentence processing.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2: 146–152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ambridge, Ben & Lieven, Elena (2011) Child Language Acquisition: Contrasting Theoretical Approaches. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amnesty International (1995) Amnesty International Report 1995. London, A.I. Publications.
Amnesty International (1996) Amnesty International Report 1996. London, A.I. Publications.
Amnesty International (2013) Amnesty International Report 2013. London, A.I. Publications.
Anderson, Steven & Lightfoot, David (2002) The Language Organ: Linguistics as Cognitive Physiology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antony, Louise (2003) “Rabbit-pots and supernovas: On the relevance of psychological data to linguistic theory.” In Barber, Alex (ed.), Epistemology of Language. Oxford, Oxford University Press. 47–68.Google Scholar
*Antony, Louise and Hornstein, Norbert (eds.) (2003) Chomsky and his Critics. Oxford, Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, David (1971) “Meaning and communication.” Philosophical Review 80: 427–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Associated Press (2012) “US justice department rules out prosecutions over CIA prison deaths.” The Guardian, August 31, 2012.
Atkinson, Martin (2001) Review of Neil Smith (1999), Chomsky: Ideas and Ideals, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Journal of Linguistics 37: 644–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bach, Emmon (1986) “Natural language metaphysics.” In Marcus, Ruth Barcan, Dorn, Georg & Weingartner, Paul (eds.), Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, VII: Proceedings of the Seventh International Congress of Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, Salzburg, 1983. Amsterdam, Elsevier. 573–595.Google Scholar
Bach, Emmon & Chao, Wynn (2012) “The metaphysics of natural language(s).” In Kempson, Ruth, Fernando, Tim & Asher, Nicholas (eds.), Philosophy of Linguistics. Oxford and Amsterdam, Elsevier. 175–196.Google Scholar
Baier, Kurt (1965) The Moral Point of View: A Rational Basis of Ethics. Abridged, ed. New York, Random House. (First published 1958, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.)Google Scholar
Bailey, Thomas Andrew (1948) The Man in the Street: The Impact of American Public Opinion on Foreign Policy. New York, Macmillan.Google Scholar
Baillargeon, Renee (2004) “Infants’ reasoning about hidden objects: evidence for event-general and event-specific expectations.” Developmental Science 7(4): 391–414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bakan, Joel (2004) The Corporation: The Pathological Pursuit of Profit and Power. New York, Free Press.Google Scholar
Baker, Dean (2006) The Conservative Nanny State: How the Wealthy Use the Government to Stay Rich and Get Richer. Washington, DC, Center for Economic and Policy Research.Google Scholar
Baker, Dean (2013) “The US-EU trade deal: don't buy the hype.” The Guardian, July 15, 2013.
Baker, Dean (2014a) “It is news that the AIG bailout was a way to give money to Goldman Sachs.” Beat the Press Blog, October 7, 2014: www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/it-is-news-that-the-aig-was-a-way-to-give-money-to-goldman-sachs.
Baker, Dean (2014b) “Expensive drugs and Medicaid: Who's afraid of trade?” Al Jazeera America, August 4, 2014.
Baker, Mark (1996) The Polysynthesis Parameter. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark (2001) The Atoms of Language. New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark (2003) “Linguistic differences and language design.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7: 349–353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, Mark (2008) “The macroparameter in a microparametric world.” In Biberauer, Theresa (ed.), The Limits of Syntactic Variation. Amsterdam, John Benjamins. 351–374.Google Scholar
Baković, Eric (2007) “Local assimilation and constraint interaction.” In de Lacy, : 335–352.CrossRef
Bakunin, Mikhail (1871) La Commune de Paris et la Notion de l'Etat. New York, Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Baltin, Mark & Collins, Chris (eds.) (2001) The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory. Oxford, Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banich, Marie & Mack, Molly (eds.) (2003) Mind, Brain, and Language: Multidisciplinary Perspectives. Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Barber, Alex (2010) “Idiolects”. In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2010 Edition). (Revised version of 2004 article.) Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/idiolects.
Baron-Cohen, Simon (1995) Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, Simon, Leslie, Alan & Frith, Uta (1985) “Does the autistic child have a theory of mind?Cognition 21: 37–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baron-Cohen, Simon & Harrison, John (eds.) (1997) Synaesthesia: Classic and Contemporary Readings. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Barrett, Robert & Gibson, Roger (eds.) (1990) Perspectives on Quine. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Barry, John (2002) “The death convoy of Afghanistan.” Newsweek, August 26, 2002.
*Barsky, Robert F. (1997) Noam Chomsky: A Life of Dissent. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
*Barsky, Robert F. (2007) The Chomsky Effect: A Radical Works Beyond the Ivory Tower. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
*Barsky, Robert F. (2011) Zellig Harris: From American Linguistics to Socialist Zionism. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry (2014) “Rich people rule!” Washington Post, April 8, 2014.
Barton, Ellen (1990) Nonsentential Constituents: A Theory of Grammatical Structure and Pragmatic Interpretation. Amsterdam, John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, Ellen & Progovac, Ljiljana (2005) “Nonsententials in minimalism.” In Elugardo, Reinaldo & Stainton, Robert (eds.), Ellipsis and Nonsentential Speech. Berlin, Springer. 71–93.Google Scholar
Basaran, Ezgi (2014) “Former CIA officer says US policies helped create IS.” al-monitor.com, September 2, 2014. Accessed December 20, 2014 at www.al-monitor.com/pulse/politics/2014/09/turkey-usa-iraq-syria-isis-fuller.html.
Bates, Elizabeth (1997) “On language savants and the structure of the mind: a review of Neil Smith & Ianthi-Maria Tsimpli, The Mind of a Savant: Language Learning and Modularity.” The International Journal of Bilingualism 2: 163–179.Google Scholar
Bates, Elizabeth & Elman, Geoffrey (1996) “Learning rediscovered.” Science 274: 1849–1850.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BBC (2014) “Cameron: IS threat may require Syria intervention.” BBC News website, September 26, 2014. www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-29366007
Bechtel, William (1994) “Connectionism.” In Guttenplan, : 200–210.
Bechtel, William & Abrahamsen, Adele (1991) Connectionism and the Mind: An Introduction to Parallel Processing in Networks. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Becker, Jo & Shane, Scott (2012) “Secret ‘kill list’ proves a test of Obama's principles and will.” New York Times, May 29, 2012, p. A1.
Beeman, Mark & Chiarello, Christine (eds.) (1997) Right Hemisphere Language Comprehension: Perspectives from Cognitive Neuroscience. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Beghelli, Filippo & Stowell, Tim (1997) “Distributivity and negation: the syntax of each and every.” In Szabolcsi, Anna (ed.), Ways of Scope Taking. Dordrecht, Kluwer. 71–107.Google Scholar
Behme, Christina (2013) Review of Piattelli-Palmarini et al., 2009. Journal of Linguistics 49: 499–506.CrossRef
Behme, Christina (2014) “A ‘Galilean’ science of language.” Journal of Linguistics 50(03): 671–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beinin, Joel (2011a) “Egypt's workers rise up.” The Nation, March 7–14, 2011.
Beinin, Joel (2011b) “Striking Egyptian workers fuel the uprising after 10 years of labor organizing: Interview with Amy Goodman and Juan Gonzalez.” Democracy Now website, February 10, 2011. www.democracynow.org/2011/2/10/egyptian_uprising_surges_as_workers_join.
Belletti, Adriana (ed.) (2004) Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana & Rizzi, Luigi (2002) Editors’ introduction to Chomsky, 2002b: 1–44.
Belletti, Adriana (2013) “Ways of avoiding intervention: Some thoughts on the development of object relatives, passive, and control.” In Piattelli-Palmarini, & Berwick, : 115–126.
Bellugi, Ursula, Marks, Shelly, Bihrle, Amy & Sabo, H. (1993) “Dissociation between language and cognitive functions in William's syndrome.” In Bishop, & Mogford, : 177–189.
Bennett, Craig, Baird, Abigail, Miller, Michael & Wolford, George (2011) “Neural correlates of interspecies perspective taking in the post-mortem Atlantic Salmon: An argument for proper multiple comparisons correction.” Journal of Serendipitous and Unexpected Results 1: 1–5.Google Scholar
Berent, Iris (2013) The Phonological Mind. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Berlinski, David (1988) Black Mischief: Language, Life, Logic, Luck. Boston, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Bernays, Edward L. (1928) Propaganda. New York, H. Liveright.Google Scholar
Berwick, Robert & Chomsky, Noam (2011) “The biolinguistic program: The current state of its development.” In di Sciullo, Anna Maria & Boeckx, Cedric (eds.), The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty. Oxford, Oxford University Press. 19–41.Google Scholar
Berwick, Robert & Chomsky, Noam (2013) “Foreword: A bird's-eye view of human language and evolution.” In Bolhuis, Johan and Everaert, Martin (eds.) Birdsong, Speech and Language: Exploring the Evolution of Mind and Brain. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press. ix–xii.Google Scholar
*Berwick, Robert, Chomsky, Noam & Piattelli-Palmarini, Massimo (2013) “Poverty of the stimulus stands: Why recent challenges fail.” In Piattelli-Palmarini, & Berwick, : 19–42.
Berwick, Robert, Friederici, Angela, Chomsky, Noam, & Bolhuis, Johan (2013) “Evolution, brain, and the nature of language.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17 (2): 89–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
*Berwick, Robert, Pietroski, Paul, Yankama, Beracah & Chomsky, Noam (2011) “Poverty of the stimulus revisited.” Cognitive Science, 35(7): 1207–1242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berwick, Robert & Weinberg, Amy (1984) The Grammatical Basis of Linguistic Performance. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bever, Tom (1988) “The psychological reality of grammar: a student's eye view of cognitive science.” In Hirst, William (ed.), The Making of Cognitive Science: Essays in Honor of George A. Miller. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 112–142.Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa, Holmberg, Anders, Roberts, Ian & Sheehan, Michelle (2010) Parametric Variation: Null Subjects in Minimalist Theory. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bierce, Ambrose (1911) The Devil's Dictionary. Vol. 7 of The Collected Works of Ambrose Bierce. New York, Neale Publishing Company. Reprinted 1948, Cleveland: World Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Bilgrami, Akeel (1992) Belief and Meaning. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bilgrami, Akeel (2002) “Chomsky and philosophy.” Mind & Language 17(3): 290–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billen, Andrew (2002) “How right can one man be?” The Times, August 19, 2002, pp. 4–5.
Billingsley, Rebecca & Papanicolaou, Andrew (eds.) (2003) Functional Neuroimaging Contributions to Neurolinguistics. Special Issue of Journal of Neurolinguistics 16: 251–456.CrossRef
Birdsong, David (1992) “Ultimate attainment in second language learning.” Language 68: 706–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, Dorothy (1993) “Language development after focal brain damage.” In Bishop, & Mogford, : 203–219.
Bishop, Dorothy & Mogford, Kay (eds.) (1993) Language Development in Exceptional Circumstances. Hove, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Black, Max (1970) “Comment” on Chomsky, 1970a. In Borger, & Cioffi, : 452–461.
Blakemore, Diane (1987) Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane (1992) Understanding Utterances. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane (2002) Relevance and Linguistic Meaning: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, Paul & Markson, Lori (1998) “Capacities underlying word learning.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2(2): 67–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bloomfield, Leonard (1914) An Introduction to the Study of Language. New York, Holt.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard (1933) Language. New York, Holt.Google Scholar
Blum, William (2005) Rogue State: A Guide to the World's Only Superpower. . Monroe, ME, Common Courage Press. (First edition 2000.)Google Scholar
Boakes, Robert & Halliday, M. Sebastian (1970) “The Skinnerian analysis of behaviour.” In Borger, & Cioffi, : 345–374.
Boeckx, Cedric (2006) Linguistic Minimalism: Origins, Concepts, Methods and Aims. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric (ed.) (2011a) The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism. Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric (2011b) “Some reflections on Darwin's problem in the context of Cartesian biolinguistics.” In Di Sciullo, Anne-Marie & Boeckx, Cedric (eds.), The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty. Oxford, Oxford University Press. 42–64.Google Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric (2012) Syntactic Islands. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric (2014) Elementary Syntactic Structures: Prospects of a Feature-free Syntax. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric and Grohmann, Kleanthes (2007) “Remark: Putting phases in perspective.” Syntax 10: 204–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric and Grohmann, Kleanthes (eds.) (2013) The Cambridge Handbook of Biolinguistics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boole, George (1854) An Investigation of the Laws of Thought: On Which Are Founded the Mathematical Theories of Logic and Probabilities. London, Walton & Maberley.Google Scholar
Borger, Robert & Cioffi, Frank (eds.) (1970) Explanation in the Behavioural Sciences. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Borsley, Robert & Roberts, Ian (1996) “Introduction.” In Borsley, Robert & Roberts, Ian (eds.), The Syntax of the Celtic Languages. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bošković, Željko (2013) “Principles and parameters theory and minimalism”. In den Dikken, : 95–121.CrossRef
Bowerman, Melissa (1987) “The ‘no negative evidence’ problem: how do children avoid constructing an overly general grammar.” In Hawkins, John (ed.), Explaining Language Universals. Oxford, Blackwell. 73–101.Google Scholar
Bracken, Harry (1978) “Philosophy and racism.” Philosophia 8(2–3): 241–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bracken, Harry (1984) Mind and Language: Essays on Descartes and Chomsky. Dordrecht, Foris.Google Scholar
Braine, Martin (1994) “Is nativism sufficient?Journal of Child Language 21: 9–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Branfman, Fred (2012) “When I saw Noam Chomsky cry.” Alternet, June 17, 2012.
Brenner, Robert (1999) “Competition and class: A reply to Foster and McNally.” Monthly Review 51(07): 24–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenner, Robert (2006) The Economics of Global Turbulence: The Advanced Capitalist Economies From Long Boom to Long Downturn, 1945–2005. London, Verso.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan (1971) “Sentence stress and syntactic transformations.” Language 47: 257–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bricmont, Jean (2010) “Chomsky, Faurisson and Vidal-Naquet.” In Bricmont, & Franck, : 292–308.CrossRef
*Bricmont, Jean & Franck, Julie (eds.) (2010) Chomsky Notebook. New York, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Briscoe, Ted (ed.) (2002) Linguistic Evolution through Language Acquisition. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodsky, Joseph (1987) Less than One: Selected Essays. Harmondsworth, Penguin.Google Scholar
Brody, Michael (1987) Review of Chomsky, 1986a. Mind & Language 2: 165–177.Google Scholar
Brody, Michael (1997) “Perfect chains.” In Haegeman, Liliane (ed.), Elements of Grammar. Dordrecht, Kluwer. 139–166.Google Scholar
Brody, Michael (1998) Review of Chomsky, 1995b. Mind & Language 13: 205–214.Google Scholar
Brody, Michael (2002) “On the status of representations and derivations.” In Epstein, & Seely, : 19–41.CrossRef
Broomhall, Bruce (2003) International Justice and the International Criminal Court: Between Sovereignty and the Rule of Law. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Colin (1994) “Waldegrave defends the right to tell House lies: Minister's career in the balance as angry MPs demand he quits Cabinet.” The Independent, March 9, 1994.
Burchill, Scott (1998) “Human nature, freedom and political community: an interview with Noam Chomsky.” Citizenship Studies 2: 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burge, Tyler (1979) “Individualism and the mental.” Studies in Philosophy 4: 73–121.Google Scholar
Burkhardt, Frederick (ed.) (1996) Charles Darwin's Letters: A Selection. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Burton-Roberts, Noel & Poole, Geoffrey (2006) “‘Virtual conceptual necessity’, feature dissociation and the Saussurian legacy in generative grammar.” Journal of Linguistics 42: 575–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burzio, Luigi (1986) Italian Syntax: A Government–Binding Approach. Dordrecht, Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Lee (2006) “At the end of the journey: the risks of Cold War thinking in a new era.” International Affairs 82(4): 763–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Sarah (2013) “Bangladeshi factory deaths spark action among high-street clothing chains.” The Observer, June 23, 2013.
Byrne, Alex (1994) “Behaviourism.” In Guttenplan, : 132–140.
Caldwell, Willard E. & Jones, Helen B. (1954) “Some positive results on a modified Tolman and Honzik insight maze.” Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 47(5): 416–418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cann, Ronnie, Kempson, Ruth & Marten, Lutz (2005) The Dynamics of Language. Oxford, Elsevier.Google Scholar
Carden, Guy (1970) “A note on conflicting idiolects.” Linguistic Inquiry 1: 281–290.Google Scholar
Carey, Alex (1995) Taking the Risk out of Democracy: Propaganda in the US and Australia. Sydney, University of New South Wales Press.Google Scholar
Carey, David (2001) “Do action systems resist visual illusions?Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5: 109–113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carey, Susan (1978) “The child as word learner.” In Halle, Morris, Bresnan, Joan & Miller, George (eds.), Linguistic Theory and Psychological Reality. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press. 264–293.Google Scholar
Carnie, Andrew (2013) Syntax: A Generative Introduction. edition. Chichester, Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Carr, Philip (2003) “Innateness, internalism and input: Chomsky's rationalism and its problems.” Language Sciences 25: 615–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, Peter (1996) Language, Thought and Consciousness: An Essay in Philosophical Psychology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carston, Robyn (1999) “The relationship between generative grammar and (relevance-theoretic) pragmatics.” University College London Working Papers in Linguistics 11: 21–39.Google Scholar
Carston, Robyn (2000) “The relationship between generative grammar and (relevance-theoretic) pragmatics.” Language and Communication 20: 87–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carston, Robyn (2002) Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford, Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, Zach & Grim, Ryan (2014) “Noam Chomsky: Obama trade deal a ‘neoliberal assault’ to further corporate ‘domination’.” Huffington Post, January 13, 2014.
Cassel, Matthew (2011) “Lebanon convulses on ‘Day of Rage’.” Al Jazeera English website, January 27, 2011.
Cathcart, Brian (2004) “Revealed: the invisible millions who have been killed by Britain's foreign policies.” The Independent, November 3, 2004.
Cattell, Ray (2000) Children's Language: Consensus and Controversy. London, Cassell.Google Scholar
Chalker, Sylvia & Weiner, Edmund (1994) The Oxford Dictionary of English Grammar. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chalmers, David John (1996) The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chance, Matthew (1997) “Secret war still claims lives in Laos.” The Independent, June 27, 1997.
Chang, Ha-Joon (2002) Kicking Away the Ladder: Development Strategy in Historical Perspective. London, Anthem.Google Scholar
Chang, Ha-Joon (2007) Bad Samaritans: Rich Nations, Poor Policies, and the Threat to the Developing World. London, Random House.Google Scholar
Cheng, Lisa L.-S (2003) “Wh-in situ.” Glot International 7: 103–109.Google Scholar
Cherniak, Christopher (2005) “Innateness and brain-wiring optimization: non-genomic nativism.” In Zilhao, A. (ed.), Cognition, Evolution, and Rationality. Routledge, London. 103–112.Google Scholar
Cherniak, Christopher (2009) “Brain wiring optimization and non-genomic nativism.” In Piattelli-Palmarini, et al.: 108–119.
Chiarello, Christine (2003) “Parallel systems for processing language: Hemispheric complementarity in the normal brain.” In Banich, & Mack, : 229–247.
Chomsky, Carol (1969) The Acquisition of Syntax in Children from Five to Ten. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Carol (1986) “Analytic study of the Tadoma method: language abilities of three deaf-blind subjects.” Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 29: 332–347. Reprinted in Piattelli-Palmarini & Berwick: 241–270.Google ScholarPubMed
Chomsky, Noam (1951) Morphophonemics of Modern Hebrew. University of Pennsylvania Master's thesis. Published as 1979b.
Chomsky, Noam (1954) Review of Eliezer Rieger, Modern Hebrew.Language 30: 180–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1955a) “Logical syntax and semantics: their linguistic relevance.”Language 31: 36–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1955b) “Semantic considerations in grammar.” Georgetown University Monograph Series in Linguistics 8: 140–158.Google Scholar
*Chomsky, Noam (1955) The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory. MS. MIT Humanities Library. Microfilm. New York, Plenum Press. [The foundation of nearly all Chomsky's subsequent linguistic work. Eventually published as 1975e.]Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1956) “Three models for the description of language.” Institute of Radio Engineers Transactions on Information Theory, IT-2: 113–124.Google Scholar
*Chomsky, Noam (1957) Syntactic Structures. The Hague, Mouton. [The book which traditionally marks the beginning of the Chomskyan revolution.]Google Scholar
*Chomsky, Noam (1959) Review of Skinner, 1957. Language 35: 26–58. Reprinted in Fodor & Katz, 1964: 547–578. [This review sounded the knell of behaviorism.]Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1961) “Some methodological remarks on generative grammar.” Word 17: 219–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1962a) “Explanatory models in linguistics.” In Nagel, Ernest, Suppes, Patrick & Tarski, Alfred (eds.), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science: Proceedings of the 1960 International Congress. Stanford, Stanford University Press. 528–550.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1962b) “A transformational approach to syntax.” In Hill, Archibald (ed.), Proceedings of the Third Texas Conference on Problems of Linguistic Analysis in English on May 9–12, 1958. Austin, TX, University of Texas Press. Reprinted in Fodor & Katz, 1964: 211–245.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1963) “Formal properties of grammars.” In Luce, R. Duncan, Bush, Robert & Galanter, Eugene (eds.), Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 2. New York, Wiley. 323–418.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1964a) “The logical basis of linguistic theory.” In Lunt, Horace (ed.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Linguists, Cambridge, Mass., August 27–31, 1962. The Hague, Mouton. 914–978.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1964b) Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. The Hague, Mouton. [Expanded version of 1964a.]Google Scholar
*Chomsky, Noam (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press. [This book encapsulates what became known as the “Standard Theory.”]Google Scholar
*Chomsky, Noam (1966a) Cartesian Linguistics: A Chapter in the History of Rationalist Thought. New York, Harper & Row. [The first systematic attempt to identify the intellectual antecedents of generative grammar.]Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1966b) Topics in the Theory of Generative Grammar. The Hague, Mouton.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1967a) “The formal nature of language.” In Lenneberg, : 397–442.
Chomsky, Noam (1967b) “Recent contributions to the theory of innate ideas.” Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 3. New York, The Humanities Press. 81–90. Reprinted in John Searle (ed.), The Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press, 1971. 121–144. Also in Synthèse (1967) 17: 2–11.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1967c) “Some general properties of phonological rules.” Language 43: 102–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Chomsky, Noam (1968) Language and Mind. New York, Harcourt, Brace & World. [Enlarged edition = 1972b. Third edition = 2006.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Chomsky, Noam (1969a) American Power and the New Mandarins. Harmondsworth, Penguin. (New edition with a foreword by Howard Zinn, 2002). [The first collection of political essays, including “The responsibility of intellectuals.”]Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1969b) “Linguistics and Philosophy.” In Hook, : 51–94.
Chomsky, Noam (1969c) “Language and the mind.” Psychology Today. Reprinted in A. Cashdan & E. Grugeon (eds.), Language in Education: A Source Book. London, Routledge & Kegan Paul with the Open University Press, 1972. 129–135.
Chomsky, Noam (1969d) “Comments on Harman's reply.” In Hook, : 152–159.
Chomsky, Noam (1970a) “Problems of explanation in linguistics.” In Borger, & Cioffi, : 425–451.
Chomsky, Noam (1970b) “Reply” to Black, 1970. In Borger, & Cioffi, : 462–470.
*Chomsky, Noam (1970c) “Remarks on nominalization.” In Jacobs, Roderick & Rosenbaum, Peter (eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Waltham, MA, Ginn & Co.184–221. [The initial counter-attack to Generative Semantics.]Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1970d) “Language and freedom.” Abraxas, I: 9–24. Reprinted in Peck, 1987: 139–156.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1970e) “Notes on anarchism.” New York Review of Books, May 21, 1970. Reprinted in 2005d: 118–32.
Chomsky, Noam (1971a) At War with Asia. London, Fontana.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1971b) “On interpreting the world.” Cambridge Review 92: 77–93. [This and the following were the Russell memorial lectures.]Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1971c) “On changing the world.” Cambridge Review 92: 117–136.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1971d) Review of Skinner, 1971. New York Review of Books, December 30, 1971.
Chomsky, Noam (1971e) “Deep structure, surface structure, and semantic interpretation.” In Steinberg, Danny & Jakobovits, Leon (eds.), Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader in Philosophy, Linguistics, Anthropology and Psychology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 183–216.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1972a) Problems of Knowledge and Freedom. New York, Pantheon.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1972b) Language and Mind. Enlarged edition. New York, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1972c) Studies on Semantics in Generative Grammar. The Hague, Mouton.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1972d) “Psychology and ideology.” Cognition 1(1): 11–46. Reprinted in Peck, 1987: 157–182. [A longer version is also in 1973b.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1972e) “Some empirical issues in the theory of transformational grammar.” In Peters, Stanley (ed.), Goals of Linguistic Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall. 63–130.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1973a) The Backroom Boys. London, Fontana.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1973b) For Reasons of State. London, Fontana. (New edition with a foreword by Arundhati Roy, 2002).Google Scholar
*Chomsky, Noam (1973c) “Conditions on transformations.” In Anderson, Steven & Kiparsky, Paul (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle. New York, Holt, Rinehart & Winston. 232–286.Google Scholar
*Chomsky, Noam (1975a) Reflections on Language. New York, Pantheon. [A classic statement of his philosophical position, including discussion of modularity.]Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1975b) Peace in the Middle East?London, Fontana. (New edition with Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2003.)Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1975c) “Questions of form and interpretation.” Linguistic Analysis 1: 75–109.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1975d) “Knowledge of language.” In Gunderson, Keith (ed.), Language, Mind, and Knowledge. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press. 299–320.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1975e) The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory. New York, Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1976a) “Conditions on rules of grammar.” Linguistic Analysis 2: 303–351.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1976b) “The relevance of anarcho-syndicalism: Noam Chomsky interviewed by Peter Jay.” July 25, 1976: for a broadcast on BBC London Weekend TV. Reprinted in 2005d: 133–148. Available online at http://libcom.org/library/relevance-anarcho-syndicalism-noam-chomsky-interviewed-peter-jay.
Chomsky, Noam (1977a) “On WH-movement.” In Culicover, Peter, Wasow, Thomas & Akmajian, Adrian (eds.), Formal Syntax. New York, Academic Press. 71–132.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1977b) Interview with David Cohen. In Cohen, David, Psychologists on Psychology. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul. 72–100.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1977c) Essays on Form and Interpretation. New York, North Holland.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1978) “Language development, human intelligence, and social organization.” In Feinberg, Walter (ed.), Equality and Social Policy. Champaign, University of Illinois Press. Reprinted in Peck, 1987: 183–202.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1979a) Language and Responsibility (Interviews with Mitsou Ronat). New York, Pantheon.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1979b) Morphophonemics of Modern Hebrew. New York, Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
*Chomsky, Noam (1980a) Rules and Representations. Oxford, Blackwell. [A classical statement of his philosophical position.]Google Scholar
*Chomsky, Noam (1980b) “Rules and representations.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3: 1–15. [A very useful short summary of 1980a.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1980c) “The new organology.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3: 42–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1980d) “On binding.” Linguistic Inquiry 11: 1–46.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1980e) “Some elementary comments on the rights of freedom of expression.” Appeared as a Preface to Robert Faurisson, Mémoire en défense. Available at www.chomsky.info/articles/19801011.htm.
*Chomsky, Noam (1981a) Radical Priorities. Montreal, Black Rose Books.Google Scholar
*Chomsky, Noam (1981b) Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht, Foris. [The source of Government and Binding theory; still presupposed in much current research.]Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1981c) “Knowledge of language: its elements and origins.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 295: 223–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1981d) “Markedness and core grammar.” In Belletti, Adrianaet al. (eds.), Theory of Markedness in Generative Grammar: Proceedings of the 1979 GLOW Conference. Pisa, Scuola Normale Superiore. 123–146.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1981e) “Principles and parameters in syntactic theory.” In Hornstein, Norbert & Lightfoot, David (eds.), Explanation in Linguistics. London, Longman. 123–146.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1981f) “On the representation of form and function.” The Linguistic Review 1: 3–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1981g) “His right to say it.” The Nation, February 28, 1981.
Chomsky, Noam (1982a) “A note on the creative aspect of language use.” The Philosophical Review 91: 423–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1982b) Towards a New Cold War: Essays on the Current Crisis and How We Got There. New York, Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
*Chomsky, Noam (1982c) The Generative Enterprise: A Discussion with Riny Huybregts and Henk van Riemsdijk. Dordrecht, Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1982d) Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1982e) “The legacy of the Vietnam war: Noam Chomsky interviewed by Paul Shannon.” Indochina Newsletter 18: 1–5. www.chomsky.info/interviews/198210–.htmGoogle Scholar
*Chomsky, Noam (1983a) The Fateful Triangle: The US, Israel and the Palestinians. Boston, South End Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1983b) “Interventionism and nuclear war.” In Albert, Michael & Dellinger, David (eds.), Beyond Survival: New Directions for the Disarmament Movement. Boston, South End Press. 249–309.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1983c) “Things no amount of learning can teach”: Noam Chomsky interviewed by John Gliedman. Omni 6(11). Online at www.chomsky.info/interviews/198311–.htm.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1984a) Modular Approaches to the Study of Mind. San Diego, San Diego State University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1984b) Réponses Inédites: À Mes Détracteurs Parisiens. Paris, Amis de Spartacus.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1985a) Turning the Tide: US Intervention in Central America and the Struggle for Peace. London, Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1985b) “Visions of righteousness.” In Rowe, John Carlos & Berg, Rick (eds.), The Vietnam War and American Culture. New York, Columbia University Press. 21–51.Google Scholar
*Chomsky, Noam (1986a) Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use. New York, Praeger. [Partly accessible, partly technical state of the art.]Google Scholar
*Chomsky, Noam (1986b) Barriers. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1986c) Pirates and Emperors: International Terrorism in the Real World. Brattleboro, VT, Amana Books.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1987a) On Power and Ideology: The Managua Lectures. Boston, South End Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1987b) Language in a Psychological Setting. Special Issue of Sophia Linguistica 22. Sophia University, Tokyo.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1987c) Generative Grammar: Its Basis, Development and Prospects. Studies in English Linguistics and Literature. Kyoto, Kyoto University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1987d) “Reply” [to reviews of his 1986a by Alex George and Michael Brody]. Mind & Language 2: 178–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1988a) The Culture of Terrorism. London, Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1988b) Language and Problems of Knowledge: The Managua Lectures. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
*Chomsky, Noam (1988c) Language and Politics, ed. Otero, Carlos. Montreal, Black Rose Books.Google Scholar
*Chomsky, Noam (1989) Necessary Illusions: Thought Control in Democratic Societies. Boston, South End Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1990a) “On formalization and formal linguistics.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8: 143–147.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1990b) “Language and mind.” In Mellor, D. Hugh (ed.), Ways of Communicating. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 56–80.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1990c) “Accessibility ‘in principle’.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13: 600–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Chomsky, Noam (1991a) Deterring Democracy. London, Verso.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1991b) Terrorizing the Neighbourhood. Stirling, AK Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1991c) “Linguistics and adjacent fields: a personal view.” In Kasher, (1991a): 3–25.
Chomsky, Noam (1991d) “Linguistics and cognitive science: problems and mysteries.” In Kasher, (1991a): 26–53.
Chomsky, Noam (1991e) “Some notes on economy of derivation and representation.” In Freidin, Robert (ed.), Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press. 417–454.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1991f) “Language, politics, and composition: a conversation with Noam Chomsky.” Journal of Advanced Composition 11: 4–35.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1991g) “Force and opinion.” Z Magazine, July–August, 1991. Available at: www.chomsky.info/articles/199107–.htm. Reprinted as 1991a: ch. 12.
Chomsky, Noam (1992a) What Uncle Sam Really Wants. Berkeley, CA, Odonian Press.Google Scholar
*Chomsky, Noam (1992b) Chronicles of Dissent: Interviews with David Barsamian. Stirling, AK Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1992c) “Explaining language use.” Philosophical Topics 20: 205–231. Reprinted in 2000a: 19–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1992d) “Language and interpretation: philosophical reflections and empirical inquiry.” In Earman, John (ed.), Inference, Explanation and Other Philosophical Frustrations. Berkeley, University of California Press. 99–128. Reprinted in 2000a: 46–74.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1992e) “A Minimalist program for linguistic theory.” MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 1: 1–71. Reprinted as 1993g.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1992f) “Vain hopes, false dreams.” Z Magazine, October, 1992: 9–23. Available at: www.chomsky.info/articles/199209–.htm.
*Chomsky, Noam (1993a) Year 501: The Conquest Continues. London, Verso.Google Scholar
*Chomsky, Noam (1993b) Rethinking Camelot: JFK, the Vietnam War, and US Political Culture. London, Verso.Google Scholar
*Chomsky, Noam (1993c) Language and Thought. London, Moyer Bell.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1993d) “Mental constructions and social reality.” In Reuland, Eric & Abraham, Werner (eds.), Knowledge and Language, Vol. 1: From Orwell's Problem to Plato's Problem. Dordrecht, Kluwer. 29–58.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1993e) The Prosperous Few and the Restless Many. Berkeley, CA, Odonian Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1993f) Letters from Lexington: Reflections on Propaganda. Edinburgh, AK Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1993g) “A Minimalist program for linguistic theory.” In Hale, Ken & Keyser, Jay (eds.), The View from Building 20: Essays in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press. 1–52. Reprinted as chapter 3 of 1995b: 162–217.Google Scholar
*Chomsky, Noam (1994a) “Chomsky, Noam.” In Guttenplan, : 153–167.
Chomsky, Noam (1994b) Secrets, Lies and Democracy. Berkeley, CA, Odonian Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1994c) Keeping the Rabble in Line: Interviews with David Barsamian. Edinburgh, AK Press.Google Scholar
*Chomsky, Noam (1994d) World Orders, Old and New. London, Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1994e) “Naturalism and dualism in the study of language and mind.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 2: 181–209. Reprinted in 2000a: 75–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1994f) “Sweet home of liberty.” Index on Censorship 23(3): 9–18.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1994g) “Language as a natural object.” The Jacobsen lecture. Reprinted in 2000a: 106–133.
Chomsky, Noam (1994h) “Language from an internalist perspective.” Lecture given at King's College, London, May 24, 1994. Revised version in 2000a: 134–163.
Chomsky, Noam (1994i) “The golden age is in us: Noam Chomsky interviewed by Alexander Cockburn.” Grand Street, Fall 1994: 170–176.
*Chomsky, Noam (1995a) “Language and nature.” Mind 104: 1–61. [The most important statement of his philosophical position.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Chomsky, Noam (1995b) The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press. [The classical statement of the early stages of his current linguistic theory: formidably difficult.]Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1995c) “The free market myth.” Open Eye 3: 8–13, 51.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1995d) “Rollback.” Z Magazine, January–May, 1995 (4 parts). Available at: www.chomsky.info/articles/199505–.htm.
Chomsky, Noam (1995e) “Bare phrase structure.” In Webelhuth, , 1995a: 383–439.
Chomsky, Noam (1995f) “Language is the perfect solution.” Interview with Noam Chomsky by Lisa Cheng & Rint Sybesma. Glot International 1, 9/10: 1–34.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1995g) “Foreword.” In Carey, A.: vi–xiii.
Chomsky, Noam (1995h) “Letter from Noam Chomsky.” Covert Action Quarterly. n.p., n.d.
Chomsky, Noam (1995i) “Noam Chomsky on post-modernism.” Post on LBBS, Z-Magazine's Left On-Line Bulletin Board. Available on the Internet: http://bactra.org/chomsky-on-postmodernism.html.
*Chomsky, Noam (1996a) Powers and Prospects: Reflections on Human Nature and the Social Order. London, Pluto Press. [Probably the best overview of his work in both academe and politics.]Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1996b) Class Warfare: Interviews with David Barsamian. London, Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1996c) “Language and evolution.” Letter in the New York Review of Books, February 1, 1996, p. 41.
Chomsky, Noam (1997a) “The cold war and the university.” In Schiffrin, André (ed.), The Cold War and the University: Towards an Intellectual History of the Postwar Years. New York, The New Press. 171–194.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1997b) Media Control: The Spectacular Achievements of Propaganda. New York, Seven Stories Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1997c) “Internalist explorations.” MS, MIT. Published in 2000a: 164–194.
Chomsky, Noam (1997d) “New horizons in the study of language.” Lecture given at the University of Balearic Islands, Spain, January 21. Published in 2000a: 3–18.
Chomsky, Noam (1997e) “Serial veto.” Index on Censorship 26 (6): 155–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1997f) “Rage against the Machine.” An interview with Tom Morello. Available at: www.chomsky.info/interviews/1996summer.htm.
Chomsky, Noam (1997g) “Language and mind: current thoughts on ancient problems.” Series of talks given at the University of Brasilia. Published in Pesquisa Linguistica 3(4). Reprinted inL. Jenkins (ed.), Variation and Universals in Biolinguistics. Amsterdam, Elsevier, 2004. 379–406.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1997h) “What makes mainstream media mainstream.” Z Magazine, October, 1997. Available at: www.chomsky.info/articles/199710–.htm.
Chomsky, Noam (1998a) “Domestic constituencies.” Z Magazine, May, 1998: 16–25. Available at www.chomsky.info/articles/199805–.htm.
Chomsky, Noam (1998b) “Comments: Galen Strawson, Mental Reality.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58: 437–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1998c) “Some observations on economy in generative grammar.” In Barbosa, Pilar, Fox, Danny, Hagstrom, Paul, McGinnis, Martha & Pesetsky, David (eds.), Is the Best Good Enough? Optimality and Competition in Syntax. Cambridge MA, MIT Press. 115–127.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1998d) The Common Good: Interviews with David Barsamian. Berkeley, CA, Odonian Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1998e) “Rogue states.” Z Magazine, April, 1998. Available at: www.chomsky.info/articles/199804–.htm.
Chomsky, Noam (1998f) “The United States and the ‘Challenge of Relativity.’” In Evans, Tony (ed.) Human Rights Fifty Years on: A Reappraisal. Manchester, Manchester University Press. 24–56.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1999a) “Derivation by phase.” MS, MIT. Published in 2001c.
Chomsky, Noam (1999b) “Language and the brain.” MS. Address at the European Conference on Cognitive Science, Siena. Reprinted in 2002b.
Chomsky, Noam (1999c) Latin America: From Colonization to Globalization. In Conversation with Heinz Dieterich. New York, Ocean Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1999d) The Umbrella of United States Power: The Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Contradictions of United States Policy. The Open Media Pamphlet Series. New York, Seven Stories Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1999e) The New Military Humanism: Lessons from Kosovo. Monroe, ME, Common Courage Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1999f) Fateful Triangle: The United States, Israel and the Palestinians. Updated edition. London, Pluto Press.Google Scholar
*Chomsky, Noam (1999g) Profit over People: Neoliberalism and Global Order. New York, Seven Stories Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1999h) Introduction to: Gary Slapper, Blood in the Bank: Social and Legal Aspects of Death at Work. Aldershot, Ashgate. xi–xv.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1999i) “An on-line interview with Noam Chomsky: On the nature of pragmatics and related issues.” Brain and Language 68: 393–401.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1999j) “Linguistics and brain science.” LAUD Linguistic Agency University GH Essen, Paper no. 500.
*Chomsky, Noam (2000a) New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. [A collection of seminal philosophical essays.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Chomsky, Noam (2000b) “Minimalist inquiries: The framework.” In Martin, Roger, Michaels, David & Uriagereka, Juan (eds.), Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press. 89–155. [The basis of recent developments in Minimalism.]Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (2000c) “States of concern.” Index on Censorship 29 (5): 44–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (2000d) “Foreign policy: The Colombian plan, April 2000”. Z Magazine, June, 2000: 26–34. Available at: www.chomsky.info/articles/200006–.htm.
Chomsky, Noam (2000e) “Linguistics and brain science”. In Marantz, Alec, Miyashita, Yasushi & O'Neil, Wayne (eds.), Image, Language, Brain. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press. 13–28.Google Scholar
*Chomsky, Noam (2000f) Rogue States: The Rule of Force in World Affairs. London, Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (2000g) A New Generation draws the Line: Kosovo, East Timor and the Standards of the West. London, Verso.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (2000h) Chomsky on MisEducation. Edited and introduced by Macedo, Donaldo. Lanham, MD, Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (2000i) “Globalization and its discontents: Noam Chomsky debates with Washington Post readers.” Washington Post, May 16, 2000. Available at www.chomsky.info/debates/20000516.htm.
*Chomsky, Noam (2001a) 9–11. New York, Seven Stories Press.Google Scholar
*Chomsky, Noam (2001b) Propaganda and the Public Mind: Interviews by David Barsamian. London, Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (2001c) “Derivation by phase.” In Kenstowicz, Michael (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press. 1–52.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (2002a) Pirates and Emperors, Old and New. London, Pluto Press. (Updated and expanded edition of 1986c.)Google Scholar
*Chomsky, Noam (2002b) On Nature and Language. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (2002c) “Terror and just response.” In Rai, : 23–35.
Chomsky, Noam (2002d) “September 11 aftermath: Where is the world heading?” In Scraton, Phil (ed.), Beyond September 11: An Anthology of Dissent. London, Pluto Press. 66–71.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (2002e) “An interview on Minimalism.” With Belletti, Adriana & Rizzi, Luigi. In Chomsky, , 2002b: 92–161.
Chomsky, Noam (2002f) Media Control: The Spectacular Achievements of Propaganda. Second enlarged edition of 1997b. New York, Seven Stories Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (2002g) “The journalist from Mars”. In Chomsky, , 2002f: 67–100 (Notes appear on pp. 65–66).
*Chomsky, Noam (2002h) Understanding Power: The Indispensable Chomsky, ed. Mitchell, Peter & Schoeffel, John. New York, The New Press. (Explanatory footnotes available at www.understandingpower.com.) [A massively documented survey.]Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (2002i) “An interview with Chomsky.” ZNet, December 28, 2002. www.zmag.org/content/Activism/chomsky_interview.cfm
Chomsky, Noam (2002j) “Human rights week 2002.” ZNet, December 28, 2002. www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=11&ItemID=2805.
Chomsky, Noam (2003a) “Torturing democracy.” ZNet Foreign Policy, January 25, 2003.
Chomsky, Noam (2003b) Power and Terror: Post-9/11 Talks and Interviews. New York, Seven Stories Press.Google Scholar
*Chomsky, Noam (2003c) “Replies.” In Antony, & Hornstein, : 255–328.
Chomsky, Noam (2003d) Middle East Illusions. Lanham, MD, Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (2003e) “Wars of terror.” New Political Science 25: 113–127. Reprinted in Carl Boggs (ed.) (2003), Masters of War: Militarism and Blowback in the Era of American Empire. New York: Routledge. 131–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (2003f) “Collateral language.” An interview with David Barsamian. www.zmag.org/ZMagSite/Aug2003/barsamian0803.html.
Chomsky, Noam (2003g) “Preventive war ‘the supreme crime’”. www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=40&ItemID=4030.
Chomsky, Noam (2003h) Hegemony or Survival: America's Quest for Global Dominance. Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (2003i) “Letter on JFK and Vietnam.” Boston Review, December 1, 2003.
Chomsky, Noam (2003j) “Dominance and its Dilemmas.” Boston Review, October 1, 2003.
Chomsky, Noam (2003k) “A conversation with Noam Chomsky: Telling the truth about imperialism (Interviewed by David Barsamian).” International Socialism Review 32, November–December 2003. www.isreview.org/issues/32/chomsky.shtml.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (2003l) “Iraq: The real agenda. An Interview with Noam Chomsky by Michael Albert.” Human Nature Review 3: 233–238.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (2003m) “Foreword.” In Joyce, David, Howard Zinn: A Radical American Vision. Amherst, NY, Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
*Chomsky, Noam (2004a) “Beyond explanatory adequacy.” In Belletti, : 104–131.
Chomsky, Noam (2004b) “Biolinguistics and the Human Capacity.” Lecture at MTA, Budapest, May 17, 2004.
Chomsky, Noam (2005a) “On phases.” MS., MIT. (Published in revised form as 2008.)
*Chomsky, Noam (2005b) “Three factors in language design.” Linguistic Inquiry 36: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (2005c) “Simple truths, hard problems: Some thoughts on terror, justice, and self-defence.” Philosophy 80: 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (2005d) Chomsky on Anarchism. Oakland, CA, AK Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (2006) Language and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (2007a) “Approaching UG from below.” In Sauerland, Uli & Gärtner, Hans (eds.), Interfaces + Recursion = Language?New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 1–29.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (2007b) “Of minds and language.” Biolinguistics 1: 9–27.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (2007c) “Book review: Symposium on Margaret Boden, Mind as Machine: A History of Cognitive Science, Oxford, 2006, two volumes.” Artificial Intelligence 171(18): 1094–1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (2007d) What We Say Goes: Conversations on U.S. Power in a Changing World: Interviews With David Barsamian. New York, Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
*Chomsky, Noam (2008) “On phases.” In Freidin, Robert, Otero, Carlos & Zubizarreta, Maria-Luisa (eds.), Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press. 136–166. [A technical discussion of a seminal theoretical innovation.]Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (2009a) “Opening remarks”. In Piattelli-Palmarini, et al.: 13–43.
Chomsky, Noam (2009b) “Conclusion.” In Piattelli-Palmarini, et al.: 379–409.
Chomsky, Noam (2009c) “The mysteries of nature: How deeply hidden?The Journal of Philosophy 106 (4): 167–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (2009d) Cartesian Linguistics: A Chapter in the History of Rationalist Thought. edition, with introduction by McGilvray, James. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Chomsky, Noam (2010a) “Some simple evo-devo theses: how true might they be for language?” In Larson, Richard, Déprez, Viviane & Yamakido, Hiroko (eds.), The Evolution of Human Language: Biolinguistic Perspectives. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 45–62.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (2010b) “The mysteries of nature: How deeply hidden?”. In Bricmont, & Franck, : 3–33.
Chomsky, Noam (2010c) “The great soul of power: Said memorial lecture”. In Bricmont, & Franck, : 34–48.
*Chomsky, Noam (2010d) Hopes and Prospects. Chicago, Haymarket Books.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (2011a) 9–11 Was there an Alternative?New York, Seven Stories Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (2011b) “Language and the Cognitive Science Revolution(s)”. Text of a lecture given at Carleton University, April 8, 2011.
Chomsky, NoamChomsky, Noam (2011c) “Language and other cognitive systems. What is special about language?Language Learning and Development 7(4): 263–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (2011d) The 7th Edward Said Memorial Lecture: www.youtube.com/watch?v=THrzcR6BF9w.
*Chomsky, Noam (2012a) Occupy. London, Penguin.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (2012b) “The assault on public education.” In These Times, April 4, 2012.
Chomsky, Noam (2012c) The Science of Language: Interviews with James McGilvray. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (2012d) “Foreword.” In Gallego, Ángel (ed.), Phases: Developing the Framework. Berlin, De Gruyter Mouton. 1–7.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (2012e) Making the Future: Occupations, Interventions, Empire and Resistance. London, Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (2013a) “Problems of projection.” Lingua 130: 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (2013b) “Poverty of the stimulus: Willingness to be puzzled”. In Piattelli-Palmarini, & Berwick, : 61–67.
Chomsky, Noam (2013c) On Anarchism. London, Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (2013d) “Interview with Chomsky.” Danotations website. Retrieved June 27, 2014, from http://danotations.com/?p=1285.
Chomsky, Noam (2013e) “Julian Assange and Wikileaks.” Accessed October 5, 2014 from: www.youtube.com/watch?v=n4Qkon2A0sw.
Chomsky, Noam (2013f) “Edward Snowden should be honoured.” Accessed October 5, 2014 from: www.youtube.com/watch?v=LdAeyxqbxJc.
Chomsky, Noam (2013g) Power Systems: Conversations on Global Democratic Uprisings and the New Challenges to U.S. Empire. Interviews with David Barsamian. New York, Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (2014a) “On Israel-Palestine and BDS: Those dedicated to the Palestinian cause should think carefully about the tactics they choose.” The Nation, July 2, 2014.
Chomsky, Noam (2014b) “Philosophy, language, making sense: Interview with Doug Morris and John Holder.” Retrieved May 20, 2014, from http://zcomm.org/znetarticle/philosophy-language-making-sense/.
*Chomsky, Noam (2014c) Masters of Mankind: Essays and Lectures, 1969–2013. Chicago, Haymarket Books.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (2014d) “The long, shameful history of American terrorism.” In These Times, November 3, 2014. http://inthesetimes.com/article/17311/noam_chomsky_the_worlds_greatest_terrorist_campaign
Chomsky, Noam (2014e) “Ceasefires in which violations never cease: What's next for Israel, Hamas, and Gaza?” Huffington Post/TomDispatch.com, September 9, 2014.
Chomsky, Noam (2014f) “A surveillance state beyond imagination is being created in one of the world's freest countries.” AlterNet, June 2, 2014.
Chomsky, Noam (2014g) “An ignorant public is the real kind of security our govt. is after.” Alternet, March 3, 2014.
Chomsky, Noam (2014h) “The dimming prospects for human survival.” Alternet, April 1, 2014.
Chomsky, Noam (2014i) “On academic labor.” Counterpunch, February 28–March 2, 2014.
Chomsky, Noam (2014j) “Minimal recursion: exploring the prospects.” In Roeper, T. & Speas, M. (eds.), Recursion: Complexity in Cognition. Cham: Springer. 1–15.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (2015) “Problems of projection: Extensions.” In Hamann, C., Matteini, S. & Domenico, E. Di (eds.), Structures, Strategies and Beyond: Studies in Honour of Adriana Belletti. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 1–16.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Andor, József (2005) “The master and his performance: An interview with Noam Chomsky.” Intercultural Pragmatics 1(1): 93–111.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, Bambini, Valentina, Chesi, Cristiano & Moro, Andrea (2012) “A conversation with Noam Chomsky: New insights on old foundations.” Retrieved March 27, 2013, from www.phenomenologyandmind.eu/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/16_Intervista-CHOMSKY.pdf.
Chomsky, Noam & Barsamian, David (2003) “Imperial ambition.” Monthly Review 55: 11–19. Available at: www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=40&ItemID=3627.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Barsamian, David (2005) Imperial Ambitions: Conversations on the Post-9/11 World (American empire project). New York, Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Barsamian, David (2012) Power Systems: Conversations With David Barsamian on Global Democratic Uprisings and the New Challenges to U.S. Empire. London: Hamish Hamilton. (US edition, 2013, New York, Metropolitan.)Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Bricmont, Jean (2010) “An interview with Noam Chomsky.” In Bricmont, & Franck, : 74–110.
Chomsky, Noam, Clark, Ramsey & Said, Edward (1999) Acts of Aggression: Policing “Rogue” States. New York, Seven Stories Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Foucault, Michel (1997) “Human nature: Justice versus power.” In Davidson, A. (ed.), Foucault and his Interlocutors. Chicago, University of Chicago Press. 107–145.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Halle, Morris (1964) “Some controversial questions in phonological theory.” Journal of Linguistics 1: 97–138.Google Scholar
*Chomsky, Noam & Halle, Morris (1968) The Sound Pattern of English. New York, Harper & Row. [The classic statement of generative phonology.]Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, Halle, Morris & Lukoff, Fred (1956) “On accent and juncture in English.” In Halle, Morris, Lunt, Horace & MacLean, Hugh (eds.), For Roman Jakobson. The Hague, Mouton. 65–80.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, Hauser, Marc & Fitch, Tecumseh (2005) “The Minimalist program.” Unpublished appendix to Fitch, et al., 2005. Available at: http://arti.vub.ac.be/cursus/2005-2006/mwo/03b-mp.pdf.
*Chomsky, Noam & Herman, Edward (1979a) The Political Economy of Human Rights, Vol. 1: The Washington Connection and Third World Fascism. Nottingham, Spokesman.Google Scholar
*Chomsky, Noam & Herman, Edward (1979b) The Political Economy of Human Rights, Vol. 2: After the Cataclysm – Postwar Indochina and the Reconstruction of Imperial Ideology. Nottingham, Spokesman.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, Huybregts, Riny, Riemsdijk, Henk van, Fukui, Naoki & Zushi, Mihoko (2004) The Generative Enterprise Revisited: Discussions With Riny Huybregts, Henk Van Riemsdijk, Naoki Fukui, and Mihoko Zushi, With a New Foreword By Noam Chomsky. Berlin–New York, Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Katz, Jerrold (1974) “What the linguist is talking about.” Journal of Philosophy 71: 347–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Katz, Jerrold (1975) “On innateness: a reply to Cooper.” Philosophical Review 84: 70–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Lasnik, Howard (1977) “Filters and control.” Linguistic Inquiry 8: 425–504.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Lasnik, Howard (1993) “The theory of principles and parameters.” In Jacobs, Joachim, Stechow, Arnim von, Sternefeld, Wolfgang & Vennemann, Theo (eds.), Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. Berlin, de Gruyter. 506–569. [A revised version constitutes chapter 1 of Chomsky, 1995b.]Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Miller, George (1963) “Introduction to the formal analysis of natural languages.” In Luce, Duncan, Bush, Robert & Galanter, Eugene (eds.), Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 2. New York, Wiley.269–322.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Orelus, Pierre W. (2014) On Language, Democracy, and Social Justice: Noam Chomsky's Critical Intervention. New York, Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Otero, Carlos (2003) Chomsky on Democracy & Education. New York, Routledge.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Polk, Laray (2013) Nuclear War and Environmental Catastrophe. New York, Seven Sisters Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Schützenberger, Marco (1963) “The algebraic theory of context-free languages.” In Braffort, Paul & Hirschberg, David (eds.), Computer Programming and Formal Systems. Studies In Logic Series. Amsterdam, North Holland. 119–161.Google Scholar
Chomsky, William (1957) Hebrew: The Eternal Language. Philadelphia, The Jewish Publication Society of America.Google Scholar
Chouinard, Michelle & Clark, Eve (2003) “Adult reformulations of child errors as negative evidence.” Journal of Child Language 30: 637–669.Google ScholarPubMed
Christiansen, Morten & Chater, Nick (2001) “Connectionist psycholinguistics: Capturing the empirical data.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5: 82–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christiansen, Morten & Chater, Nick (2008) “Language as shaped by the brain.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31: 489–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiansen, Morten, Dale, Rick & Reali, Florence (2010) “Connectionist explorations of multiple-cue integration in syntax acquisition.” In Johnson, Scott P. (ed.), Neoconstructivism: The New Science of Cognitive Development. Oxford, Oxford University Press. 87–108.Google Scholar
Christiansen, Morten & Kirby, Simon (2003) “Language evolution: Consensus and controversies.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7: 300–307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chu, Ben (2014) “A bothersome GDP breakdown.” The Independent, November 26, 2014.
Chulov, Martin (2014) “Isis: The inside story.” The Guardian, December 11, 2014.
Cingano, Federico (2014) “Trends in income inequality and its impact on economic growth.” OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers163.CrossRef
Clark, Alexander & Eyraud, Rémi (2007) “Polynomial identification in the limit of context-free substitutable languages.” Journal of Machine Learning Research 8: 1725–1745.Google Scholar
Clark, Alexander, Fox, Chris & Lappin, Shalom (eds.) (2010) The Handbook of Computational Linguistics and Natural Language Processing. Oxford, Wiley–Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Alexander & Lappin, Shalom (2011) Linguistic Nativism and the Poverty of the Stimulus. Chichester, West Sussex; Malden, MA, Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. & Fox Tree, Jean E. (2002) “Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking.” Cognition 84(1): 73–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Kenneth (1989) Leonardo da Vinci. London, Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Cobain, Ian (2013) “CIA rendition: more than a quarter of countries ‘offered covert support’.” The Guardian, February 5, 2013.
Cobain, Ian (2014a) “UK among US allies fearing revelations over role in CIA rendition programme.” The Guardian, December 8, 2014.
Cobain, Ian (2014b) “Britain convulsed by its dirty secret in wake of CIA torture report.” The Guardian, December 12, 2014.
Cobain, Ian (2014c) “Questions for Jack Straw over CIA torture report – and his response.” The Guardian, December 12, 2014.
Cockburn, Patrick (2006) The Occupation. London, Verso.Google Scholar
Cockburn, Patrick (2008) Muqtada: Muqtada Al-Sadr, the Shia Revival, and the Struggle for Iraq. New York, Scribner.Google Scholar
Cockburn, Patrick (2014) The Jihadi's Return: Isis and the Failures of the Global War on Terror. New York and London, OR books. Reprinted as The Rise of Islamic State: Isis and the New Sunni Revolution. London, Verso, 2015.Google Scholar
Cohen, Joshua & Rogers, Joel (1991) “Knowledge, morality and hope: the social thought of Noam Chomsky.” New Left Review 187: 5–27.Google Scholar
Coker, Christopher (1987) “The mandarin and the commissar: the political thought of Noam Chomsky.” In Modgil, & Modgil, : 269–278.
Cole, Peter & Hermon, Gabriella (1981) “Subjecthood and islandhood: Evidence from Quechua.” Linguistic Inquiry 12: 1–30.Google Scholar
Collins, Chris (2001) “Economy conditions in syntax.” In Baltin, & Collins, : 45–61.CrossRef
Collins, Harry & Pinch, Trevor (1993) The Golem: What You Should Know about Science. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Collins, John (2003) “Horwich's schemata meet syntactic structures.” Mind 112(447): 399–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, John (2004a) “Faculty disputes.” Mind & Language 19 (5): 503–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, John (2004b) “Review of Chomsky and His Critics.” Oxford: Blackwell. Erkenntnis 60(2): 275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, John (2005) “On the input problem for massive modularity.” Minds and Machines 15(1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, John (2006) “Between a rock and a hard place: A dialogue on the philosophy and methodology of generative linguistics.” Croatian Journal of Philosophy 18: 469.Google Scholar
Collins, John (2007a) “Linguistic competence without knowledge of language.” Philosophy Compass 2(6): 880–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, John (2007b) “Syntax, more or less.” Mind 116(464): 805–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, John (2007c) “Meta-scientific eliminativism: A reconsideration of Chomsky's review of Skinner's Verbal Behavior.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58(4): 625–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, John (2007d) “Review of ‘Ignorance of Language’, M. Devitt, 2006.” Mind 116(462): 416–423.Google Scholar
*Collins, John (2008a) Chomsky: A Guide for the Perplexed. London; New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Collins, John (2008b) “Knowledge of language redux.” Croatian Journal of Philosophy 22: 3–43.Google Scholar
Collins, John (2009a) “Methodology, not metaphysics: Against semantic externalism.” Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 83(1): 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, John (2009b) “The perils of content.” Croatian Journal of Philosophy 27: 259–289.Google Scholar
Collins, John (2011) “Impossible words again: Or why beds break but not make.” Mind & Language 26(2): 234–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, John (2014) “Representations without representa: Content and illusion in linguistic theory.” In Stalmaszczyk, Piotr (ed.), Semantics and Beyond: Philosophical and Linguistic Inquiries. Berlin, Walter de Gruyter. 27–63.Google Scholar
Coltheart, Max, Langdon, Robyn & Breen, Nora (1997) “Misidentification syndromes and cognitive neuropsychiatry.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1: 157–158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Comrie, Bernard, Polinsky, Maria & Matthews, Stephen (eds.) (1997) The Atlas of Languages: The Origin and Development of Languages throughout the World. London, Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Cook, Vivian & Newson, Mark (1996) Chomsky's Universal Grammar: An Introduction. edition. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cooper, David E (1972) “Innateness: Old and new.” The Philosophical Review 81(4): 465–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cormack, Annabel (1999) “Without specifiers.” In Adger, David, Pintzuk, Susan, Plunkett, Bernadette & Tsoulas, George (eds.), Specifiers: Minimalist Approaches. Oxford, Oxford University Press. 46–68.Google Scholar
Cormack, Annabel & Smith, Neil (1994) “Serial verbs.” University College London Working Papers in Linguistics 6: 63–88.Google Scholar
Cormack, Annabel & Smith, Neil (1996) “Checking theory: features, functional heads, and checking parameters.” University College London Working Papers in Linguistics 8: 243–281.Google Scholar
Cormack, Annabel & Smith, Neil (1997) “Checking features and split signs.” University College London Working Papers in Linguistics 9: 223–252.Google Scholar
Cormack, Annabel & Smith, Neil (2004) “Backward control in Korean and Japanese.” University College London Working Papers in Linguistics 16: 57–83.Google Scholar
Cormack, Annabel & Smith, Neil (In prep.) Interfaces: Syntax, Semantics and the Language of Thought.
Cottingham, John (1984) Rationalism. London, Paladin.Google Scholar
Cowart, Wayne (1997) Experimental Syntax: Applying Objective Methods to Sentence Judgments. London, Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Crain, Stephen & Pietroski, Paul (2001) “Nature, nurture and Universal Grammar.” Linguistics and Philosophy 24(2): 139–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crain, Stephen & Pietroski, Paul (2002) “Why language acquisition is a snap.” The Linguistic Review 18(1–2): 163–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crain, Stephen & Thornton, Rosalind (1998) Investigations in Universal Grammar: A Guide to Experiments on the Acquisition of Syntax and Semantics. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Crozier, Michel, Huntington, Samuel P. & Watanuki, Joji (1975) The Crisis of Democracy: Report on the Governability of Democracies to the Trilateral Commission. New York, New York University Press.Google Scholar
Culbertson, Jennifer & Gross, Steven (2009) “Are linguists better subjects?The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60(4): 721–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culicover, Peter (1999) Syntactic Nuts: Hard Cases, Syntactic Theory and Language Acquisition. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cumings, Bruce (1981) The Origins of the Korean War. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cummins, Robert & Harnish, Robert (1980) “The language faculty and the interpretation of linguistics.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3(01): 18–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtis, Mark (2003) Web of Deceit: Britain's Real Role in the World. London, Vintage.Google Scholar
Curtis, Mark (2004) Unpeople: Britain's Secret Human Rights Abuses. London, Vintage.Google Scholar
Curtiss, Susan (1977) Genie: A Psycholinguistic Study of a Modern Day “Wild Child”. London, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Curtiss, Susan (2013) “Revisiting modularity: Using language as a window to the mind.” In Piattelli-Palmarini, & Berwick, : 68–90.
Curtiss, Susan, Fromkin, Victoria, Krashen, Stephen, Rigler, David & Rigler, Marilyn (1974) “The linguistic development of Genie.” Language 50: 528–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushman, Fiery, Young, Liane & Hauser, Marc (2006) “The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment: testing three principles of harm.” Psychological Science 17(12): 1082–1089.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cutler, Anne (ed.) (2005) Twenty-first Century Psycholinguistics: Four Cornerstones. Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cutler, Anne (2012) Native Listening: Language Experience and the Recognition of Spoken Words. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
D'Agostino, Fred (1986) Chomsky's System of Ideas. Oxford, Clarendon Press. [An excellent but somewhat dated survey of his philosophical position.]Google Scholar
Damasio, Antonio (1994) Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. New York, Putnam.Google Scholar
Danielson, Dennis & Graney, Christopher (2014) “The case against Copernicus.” Scientific American 310 (1): 62–67.Google ScholarPubMed
Darwin, Charles ([1859]1968) The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, ed. Burrow, J. W.. Harmondsworth, Penguin.Google Scholar
Daum, Werner (2001) “Universalism and the West.” Harvard International Review 23(2): 19–23.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald (1984) Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald (1990) “The structure and content of truth.” Journal of Philosophy 87(6): 279–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald (1994) “Davidson, Donald.” In Guttenplan, : 231–236.
Davidson, Donald & Harman, Gil (eds.) (1972) Semantics of Natural Language. Dordrecht, Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Martin (1986) “Tacit knowledge, and the structure of thought and language.” In Travis, Charles (ed.), Meaning and Interpretation. Oxford, Blackwell. 127–158.Google Scholar
Davies, Martin (1989) “Tacit knowledge and subdoxastic states.” In George, Alexander (ed.), Reflections on Chomsky. Cambridge, MA, Basil Blackwell. 131–152.Google Scholar
Davies, Martin (2015) “Knowledge – Explicit, implicit and tacit: Philosophical aspects.” In Wright, J. D. (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences. edition. Oxford, Elsevier. 74–90.Google Scholar
Dayal, Veneeta (2013) “The syntax of scope and quantification.” In den Dikken, : 827–859.CrossRef
de Beaugrande, Robert (1991) “Language and the facilitation of authority: the discourse of Noam Chomsky.” Journal of Advanced Composition 11: 425–442. [This paper is ostensibly a reaction to an interview with Chomsky in the same journal: “Language, politics, and composition: A conversation with Noam Chomsky,” ibid. pp. 4–35.]Google Scholar
Defense Manpower Data Center (2014) “Total military personnel and dependent end strength by service, regional area, and country.” Excel spreadsheet “SIAD_309_Report_P1409.xlsx” downloaded on December 19, 2014 from www.dmdc.osd.mil/appj/dwp/rest/download?fileName=SIAD_309_Report_P1409.xlsx&groupName=milRegionCountry.
Dehaene, Stanislas (1997) The Number Sense. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dehaene, Stanislas (2003) “Natural born readers.” New Scientist, July 5, 2003, pp. 30–33.
De Lacy, Paul (ed.) (2007) The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
den Dikken, Marcel (ed.) (2013) The Cambridge Handbook of Generative Syntax. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, Daniel (1978) Brainstorms. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel (1987) The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel (1995) Darwin's Dangerous Idea. New York, Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel (1996) Kinds of Minds. London, Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Derbyshire, Desmond (1985) Hixkaryana and Linguistic Typology. Arlington, TX, Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Descartes, René (1988) Descartes: Selected Philosophical Writings. Edited and translated by Cottingham, John, Stoothoff, Robert & Murdoch, Dugald. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, Diana (2013) “Absolute pitch.” In Deutsch, Diana (ed.), The Psychology of Music. edition. San Diego, Elsevier. 141–182.Google Scholar
Deutsch, Diana, Dooley, Kevin, Henthorn, Trevor & Head, Brian (2009) “Absolute pitch among students in an American music conservatory: Association with tone language fluency.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 125 (4): 2398–2403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Villiers, Jill & de Villiers, Peter (2000) “Linguistic determinism and the understanding of false beliefs.” In Mitchell, Peter & Riggs, Kevin (eds.), Children's Reasoning and the Mind. New York, Psychology Press. 191–228.Google Scholar
Devitt, Michael (2006a) “Intuitions in linguistics.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57(3): 481–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devitt, Michael (2006b) Ignorance of Language. Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devitt, Michael (2014) “Linguistic intuitions are not ‘the voice of competence’.” In Haug, Matthew (ed.), Philosophical Methodology: The Armchair or the Laboratory?London, Routledge. 268–293.Google ScholarPubMed
Devitt, Michael & Sterelny, Kim (1989) “Linguistics: What's wrong with ‘The right view’.” Philosophical Perspectives 3: 497–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dishneau, David (2013) “Daniel Ellsberg: Bradley Manning is ‘one more casualty’ of war.” Huffington Post, August 21, 2013.
Dixon, Robert M. W. (1963) Linguistic Science and Logic. The Hague, Mouton.Google Scholar
Dobbs, Betty J. T. (1991) The Janus Faces of Genius: The Role of Alchemy in Newton's Thought. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Domhoff, G. William (2014) Who Rules America? The Triumph of the Corporate Rich. edition. New York, McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
Doward, Jamie (2014a) “UK ambassador ‘lobbied senators to hide Diego Garcia role in rendition’.” The Observer, August 17, 2014.
Doward, Jamie (2014b) “Diego Garcia guards its secrets even as the truth on CIA torture emerges.” The Observer, December 14, 2014.
Dretske, Fred I. (1981) Knowledge and the Flow of Information. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Bob (2013) “How the US war in Afghanistan fueled the Taliban insurgency.” The Nation, October 7, 2013.
Dryer, Matthew (2007) “Word order.” In Shopen, Timothy (ed.), Clause Structure, Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 1. edition. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dummett, Michael (1975) “What is a theory of meaning? (1).” In Guttenplan, S. (ed.), Mind and Language. Oxford, Oxford University Press. 97–138.Google Scholar
Dummett, Michael (1981) “Objections to Chomsky.” London Review of Books 3: 16, 5–6. Re-printed in Otero, 1994, Vol. 2: 391–7.Google Scholar
Dummett, Michael (1989) “Language and communication.” In George, : 192–212.
Dummett, Michael (1993) The Seas of Language. Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Du Plessis, Hans (1977) “Wh movement in Afrikaans.” Linguistic Inquiry 8: 723–726.Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro (1997) Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dwyer, Susan (1999) “Moral competence.” In Murasugi, Kimiko & Stainton, Robert (eds.), Philosophy and Linguistics. Boulder, CO, Westview Press. 169–190.Google Scholar
Edgley, Alison (2000) The Social and Political Thought of Noam Chomsky. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Edwards, Rob (1998) “End of the germ line.” New Scientist 2127: 22.Google Scholar
Egan, Frances (2003) “Naturalistic inquiry: Where does mental representation fit in?” In Antony, & Hornstein, : 89–104.
Ellis, Hadyn & Lewis, Michael (2001) “Capgras delusion: A window on face recognition.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5: 149–156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellsberg, Daniel (2011) “This shameful abuse of Bradley Manning.” The Guardian, March 11, 2011.
Ellsberg, Daniel (2014) “Snowden would not get a fair trial – and Kerry is wrong.” The Guardian, May 30, 2014.
Elman, Jeffrey (1993) “Learning and development in neural networks: the importance of starting small.” Cognition 48: 71–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
*Elman, Jeffrey, Bates, Elizabeth, Johnson, Mark, Karmiloff-Smith, Annette, Parisi, Domenico & Plunkett, Kim (1996) Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Emonds, Joseph (1978) “The verbal complex V’-V in French.” Linguistic Inquiry 9: 151–175.Google Scholar
Enard, Wolfgang, Przeworski, Molly, Fisher, Simon, Lai, Cecilia, Wiebe, Victor, Kitano, Takashi, Monaco, Anthony & Pääbo, Svante (2002) “Molecular evolution of FOXP2, a gene involved in speech and language.” Nature 418: 869–872.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Engdahl, Elisabet (1983) “Parasitic gaps.” Linguistics & Philosophy 6: 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Samuel, Kitahara, Hisatsugu, Obata, Miki & Seely, Daniel (2013) “Economy of derivation and representation.” In den Dikken, : 487–514.CrossRef
Epstein, Samuel & Seely, Daniel (eds.) (2002) Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program. Oxford, Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erickson, Thomas and Mattson, Mark (1981) “From words to meaning: A semantic illusion.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 20: 540–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eubank, Lynn & Gregg, K. R. (1996) “Critical periods and (S)LA.” Working Papers in English and Applied Linguistics 3: 1–21.Google Scholar
Evans, Gareth (1982) The Varieties of Reference. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas & Levinson, Stephen (2009) “The myth of language universals: language diversity and its importance for cognitive science.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32: 429–492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Everett, Daniel (2005) “Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Pirahã.” Current Anthropology 46(4): 621–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everett, Daniel (2009) “Pirahã culture and grammar: A response to some criticisms.” Language 85(2): 405–442.Google Scholar
Everett, Daniel (2012) Language: The Cultural Tool. London, Profile.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Thomas (1995) Golden Rule: The Investment Theory of Party Competition and the Logic of Money-Driven Political Systems. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ferreira, Fernanda & Patson, Nikole (2007) “The ‘Good Enough’ approach to language comprehension.” Language and Linguistics Compass 1 (1–2): 71–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiengo, Robert (2006) “Review: Chomsky's Minimalism by Pieter Seuren.” Mind 115(458): 469–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles, Kay, Paul & O'Connor, Mary (1988) “Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: the case of let alone.” Language 64: 501–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitch, Tecumseh, Hauser, Marc & Chomsky, Noam (2005) “The evolution of the language faculty: clarifications and implications.” Cognition 97: 179–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fitch, Tecumseh & Mietchen, Daniel (2013) “Convergence and deep homology in the evolution of spoken language.” In Bolhuis, Johan and Everaert, Martin (eds.), Birdsong, Speech and Language: Exploring the Evolution of Mind and Brain. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press. 45–62.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, Gareth (2010) “Linguistic intuitions.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61(1): 123–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Janet Dean (1998) “Unambiguous triggers.” Linguistic Inquiry 29: 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Janet Dean (2001) “Setting syntactic parameters”. In Baltin, & Collins, : 730–767.CrossRef
Fodor, Janet Dean & Crowther, Carrie (2002) “Understanding stimulus poverty arguments.” The Linguistic Review 18: 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Jerry (1974) “Special Sciences.” Synthèse 28: 77–115. Reprinted in J. Fodor, Representations: Philosophical Essays on the Foundations of Cognitive Science. Brighton, Harvester Press, 1981. 127–145.Google Scholar
*Fodor, Jerry (1975) The Language of Thought. New York, Crowell.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry (1980) “Introduction: Some notes on what linguistics is talking about.” In Block, Ned (ed.), Readings in Philosophy of Psychology. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press. 197–207.Google Scholar
*Fodor, Jerry (1983) The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry (1987) Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry (1998) Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. Oxford, Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Jerry (2000) The Mind doesn't Work that Way. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry (2008) LOT 2: The Language of Thought Revisited. Oxford, Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Jerry & Bever, Tom (1965) “The psycholinguistic validity of linguistic segments.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 4: 414–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Jerry, Bever, Tom & Garrett, Merrill (1974) The Psychology of Language: An Introduction to Psycholinguistics and Generative Grammar. New York, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry & Garrett, Merrill (1966) “Some reflections on competence and performance.” In Lyons, John & Wales, Roger (eds.), Psycholinguistics Papers. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press. 135–154.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry, Garrett, Merrill, Walker, Edward & Parkes, Cornelia (1980) “Against definitions.” Cognition 8 (3): 263–367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fodor, Jerry & Katz, Jerrold (eds.) (1964) The Structure of Language: Readings in the Philosophy of Language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry & Pylyshyn, Zenon (1988) “Connectionism and cognitive architecture: a critical analysis.” In Pinker, Steven & Mehler, Jacques (eds.), Connections and Symbols. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press; Bradford Books.Google Scholar
Foley, Conor (1995) Human Rights, Human Wrongs: The Alternative Report to the United Nations Human Rights Committee. London, Rivers Oram Press.Google Scholar
Føllesdal, Dagfinn (1990) “Indeterminacy and mental states.” In Barrett, & Gibson, : 98–109.
Fox, Jeremy (2001) Chomsky and Globalisation. Cambridge, Icon Books.Google Scholar
Franz, Volker (2001) “Action does not resist visual illusions.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5: 457–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freidin, Robert (1997) Review of Chomsky, 1995b. Language 73: 571–582.Google Scholar
Freidin, Robert (1999) “Cyclicity and Minimalism.” In Epstein, Samuel & Hornstein, Norbert (eds.), Working Minimalism. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press. 95–126.Google Scholar
Freidin, Robert (2009) “A note on methodology in linguistics.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32(05): 454–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friel, Howard (2014) Chomsky and Dershowitz: On Endless War and the End of Civil Liberties. Northampton, MA, Olive Branch Press.Google Scholar
Frith, Uta (1989) Autism: Explaining the Enigma. Oxford, Blackwell. [edition, 2003.]Google Scholar
Fromkin, Victoria (1988) “Grammatical aspects of speech errors.” In Newmeyer, F. (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, Vol. 2. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 117–138.Google Scholar
Fromkin, Victoria (1997) “Some thoughts about the brain/mind/language interface.” Lingua 100: 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froud, Karen (2001) Linguistic Theory and Language Pathology: Evidence for the Morphology Interface from a Case of Acquired Language Disorder. PhD thesis, UCL.
Gable, Robert (2006) “The toxicity of recreational drugs.” American Scientist 94 (3): 206–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagliardi, Annie & Lidz, Jeffrey (2014) “Statistical insensitivity in the acquisition of Tsez noun classes.” Language 90: 58–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galbraith, James K. (2003a) “Exit Strategy: In 1963, JFK ordered a complete withdrawal from Vietnam.” Boston Review, September 1, 2003.
Galbraith, James K. (2003b) “Letter on JFK and Vietnam.” Boston Review, December 1, 2003.
Galbraith, James K. (2013) “JFK's Vietnam withdrawal plan is a fact, not speculation: A response to Rick Perlstein.” The Nation, November 22, 2013.
Gallistel, Charles (1990) The Organization of Learning. Cambridge, MA–London, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gallistel, Charles (1994) “Space and Time.” In Mackintosh, Nicholas (ed.), Animal Learning and Cognition. Handbook of Perception and Cognition 9. New York, Academic Press.221–253.Google Scholar
Garfield, Jay, Peterson, Candida & Perry, Tricia (2001) “Social cognition, language acquisition and the development of theory of mind.” Mind & Language 16: 494–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gates, Gary (1996) “The price of information.” Synthèse 107(3): 325–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gazdar, Gerald (1981) “On syntactic categories.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 295: 267–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gazzaniga, Michael (1994) Nature's Mind. London, Penguin.Google Scholar
Gazzaniga, Michael (2002) “The split brain revisited.” Scientific American, May 17, 2002: 26–31.
George, Alexander (ed.) (1989) Reflections on Chomsky. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
George, Alexander (1996) “Katz astray.” Mind & Language 11: 295–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geschwind, Norman (1965) “Disconnexion syndromes in animals and man.” Brain 88(3): 585–644.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geschwind, Norman & Kaplan, Edith (1962) “A human cerebral deconnection syndrome: A preliminary report.” Neurology 50: 1201–1212.Google Scholar
Gettier, Edmund L. (1963) “Is justified true belief knowledge?Analysis 23(6): 121–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilens, Martin (2012) Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gilens, Martin & Page, Benjamin I. (2014) “Testing theories of American politics: elites, interest groups, and average citizens.” Perspectives on Politics 12(03): 564–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillan, Audrey (2003) “Torture evidence ‘acceptable’.” The Guardian, July 22, 2003, p. 2.
Gimbel, Steven & Walz, Anke (2006) Defending Einstein: Hans Reichenbach's Writings on Space, Time, and Motion. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gleick, James (1992) Richard Feynman and Modern Physics. London, Abacus.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele (2003) “Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7: 219–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman-Eisler, Freda (1968) Psycholinguistics: Experiments in Spontaneous Speech. London, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Goldrick, Matthew, Ferreira, Victor, and Miozzo, Michele (eds.) (2014) The Oxford Handbook of Language Production. Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Stephen (1994) “Inside Parliament: Howard shuns consensus in anti-terror law debate: Labour accused of placating left over PTA – Mandelson seeks assurance over talks leak – Waldegrave urged to clarify ‘lie’ comments.” The Independent, March 10, 1994.
Gopnik, Alison (2003) “The theory theory as an alternative to the innateness hypothesis.” In Antony, & Hornstein, : 238–254.CrossRef
Gopnik, Myrna (1990) “Feature-blindness: a case study.” Language Acquisition 1: 139–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopnik, Myrna (1994) “Impairments of tense in a familial language disorder.” Journal of Neurolinguistics 8: 109–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopnik, Myrna (ed.) (1997) The Inheritance and Innateness of Grammars. New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gopnik, Myrna & Crago, Martha (1991) “Familial aggregation of a developmental language disorder.” Cognition 39: 1–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gopnik, Myrna & Goad, Heather (1997) “What underlies inflectional error patterns in genetic dysphasia?Journal of Neurolinguistics 10: 109–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, Robert (ed.) (2005) Anarchism: A Documentary History of Libertarian Ideas. Montreal–New York, Black Rose Books.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Jon (2014) “Lizza says Obama has bombed more nations than Bush.” Politifact website, September 25, 2014. Available at: www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2014/sep/25/ryan-lizza/lizza-says-obama-has-bombed-more-nations-bush.
Greenwald, Glenn (2009) “The suppressed fact: Deaths by U.S. torture.” Salon, June 30, 2009.
Greenwald, Glenn (2012) “Obama's justice department grants final immunity to Bush's CIA torturers.” The Guardian, August 31, 2012.
Greenwald, Glenn (2013) “How Noam Chomsky is discussed.” The Guardian, March 23, 2013.
Greenwald, Glenn (2014a) “Key Democrats, led by Hillary Clinton, leave no doubt that endless war is official U.S. doctrine.” The Intercept, July 10, 2014.
Greenwald, Glenn (2014b) No Place to Hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the U.S. Surveillance State. London, Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar
Greenwald, Glenn (2014c) “On media outlets that continue to describe unknown drone victims as ‘militants’.” The Intercept, November 18, 2014.
Grice, Paul (1957) “Meaning.” The Philosophical Review 66: 377–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, Paul (1975) “Logic and conversation.” In Cole, Peter & Morgan, Jerry (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts. New York, Academic Press. 41–58. Reprinted in Grice, 1989: 22–40.Google Scholar
Grice, Paul (1982) “Meaning revisited.” In Smith, N.: 223–243.
Grice, Paul (1989) Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gross, Steven & Culbertson, Jennifer (2011) “Revisited linguistic intuitions.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62(3): 639–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, Steven & Rey, Georges (2012) “Innateness.” In Margolis, Eric, Samuels, Richard & Stich, Stephen (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Cognitive Science. Oxford, Oxford University Press. 318–360.Google Scholar
Grossenbacher, Peter & Lovelace, Christopher (2001) “Mechanisms of synesthesia: Cognitive and physiological constraints.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5: 36–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guérin, Daniel (1965) Ni Dieu Ni Maître, Anthologie Historique Du Mouvement Anarchiste. Paris, Éditions de Delphes.Google Scholar
Guttenplan, Samuel (ed.) (1994) A Companion to the Philosophy of Mind. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Haas, Michael (1991) Cambodia, Pol Pot, and the United States: The Faustian Pact. New York, Praeger.Google Scholar
Haeberli, Eric (2002) “Analyzing Old and Middle English V2: Evidence from the distribution of subjects and adjuncts.” Paper presented at the LAGB, UMIST, September 2002.
Haegeman, Liliane (1994) Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. edition. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane (2006) Thinking Syntactically: A Guide to Argumentation and Analysis. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hagoort, Peter (2005) “Broca's complex as the unification space for language.” In Cutler, : 157–172.
Haider, Hubert & Rosengren, Inger (1998) Scrambling. Lund, University of Lund.Google Scholar
Hale, Ken (1982) “On the position of Warlpiri in a theory of typology.” Circulated by Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington.
Hale, Sheila (2002) The Man who lost his Language. London, Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Haley, Michael & Lunsford, Ronald (1994) Noam Chomsky. New York, Twayne Publishers.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris (1959) The Sound Pattern of Russian. The Hague, Mouton.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. (1975) Learning How to Mean. London, Arnold.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harbert, Wayne (1995) “Binding theory, control and pro.” In Webelhuth, , 1995a: 177–240.
Harbour, Daniel (2009) “The universal basis of local linguistic exceptionality.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32(05): 456–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harbour, Daniel (2011) “Mythomania? Methods and morals from ‘The Myth of Language Universals’.” Lingua 121(12): 1820–1830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harbour, Daniel (2012) “Chomsky, the Pirahã, and turduckens of the Amazon.” Retrieved August 21, 2014, from http://daniel-harbour.blogspot.no/2012/03/chomsky-piraha-and-turduckens-of-amazon.html.
*Harman, Gilbert (1969) “Linguistic competence and empiricism.” In Hook, : 143–151.
*Harman, Gilbert (ed.) (1974) On Noam Chomsky: Critical Essays. New York, Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Harman, Gilbert (1980) “Two quibbles about analyticity and psychological reality.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3: 21–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, Gilbert (2001) “New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind by Noam Chomsky: Review.” The Journal of Philosophy 98(5): 265–269.Google Scholar
Harris, Randy Allen (1993) The Linguistics Wars. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Zellig (1951) Methods in Structural Linguistics. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Zellig (1952) “Discourse analysis.” Language 28: 1–30.Google Scholar
Harris, Zellig (1957) “Co-occurrence and transformation in linguistic structure.” Language 33: 283–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Zellig (1965) “Transformational theory.” Language 41: 363–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Zellig (1997) The Transformation of Capitalist Society. Lanham, MD, Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Hart, Peter (2014) “Washington Post editorial page, meet Noam Chomsky.” FAIR blog, August 29, 2014. http://fair.org/blog/2014/08/29/washington-post-editorial-page-meet-noam-chomsky/.
Hauser, Marc D. (2006) Moral Minds: How Nature Designed Our Universal Sense of Right and Wrong. edition. New York, Ecco.Google Scholar
*Hauser, Marc, Chomsky, Noam & Fitch, Tecumseh (2002) “The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?Science 298 (November 22): 1569–1579. [The basis of all Chomsky's subsequent work on the evolution of language.]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hauser, Marc, Yang, Charles, Berwick, Robert, Tattersall, Ian, Ryan, Michael, Watumull, Jeffrey, Chomsky, Noam, and Lewontin, Richard (2014) “The mystery of language evolution.” Frontiers in Psychology 05/2014; 5:401. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haverkort, Marco (2005) “Linguistic representation and language use in aphasia.” In Cutler, : 57–68.
Heim, Irene & Kratzer, Angelika (1998) Semantics in Generative Grammar. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Herman, Edward S. (1992) Beyond Hypocrisy. Boston, South End Press.Google Scholar
Herman, Edward S. (2003) “The propaganda model: A retrospective.” Against All Reason 1: 1–14.Google Scholar
*Herman, Edward S. & Chomsky, Noam (1994) Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. New York, Vintage. (First published 1988, New York: Pantheon.)Google Scholar
Hermer, Linda & Spelke, Elizabeth (1996) “Modularity and development: The case of spatial reorientation.” Cognition 61: 195–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hermer-Vazquez, Linda, Spelke, Elizabeth & Katsnelson, Alla (1999) “Sources of flexibility in human cognition: Dual-task studies of space and language.” Cognitive Psychology 39(1): 3–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heycock, Caroline & Wallenberg, Joel (2013) “How variational acquisition drives syntactic change: The loss of verb movement in Scandinavian.” The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 16: 127–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higginbotham, James (1991) “Remarks on the metaphysics of linguistics.” Linguistics & Philosophy 14(5): 555–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilsman, Roger (1967) To Move a Nation: The Politics of Foreign Policy in the Administration of John F. Kennedy. New York, Doubleday.Google Scholar
Hintikka, Jaakko (1989) “Logical form and linguistic theory.” In George, : 41–57.
Hintikka, Jaakko & Sandu, Gabriel (1991) On the Methodology of Linguistics. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hirschfeld, Lawrence & Gelman, Susan (eds.) (1994) Mapping the Mind: Domain-specificity in Cognition and Culture. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hitchcock, Christopher (2007) “What Russell got right.” In Price, Huw & Corry, Richard (eds.), Causation, Physics, and the Constitution of Reality: Russell's Republic Revisited. Oxford, Clarendon Press. 45–65.Google Scholar
*Hitchens, Christopher (1985) “The Chorus and Cassandra: What everyone knows about Noam Chomsky.” Grand Street 5(1): 106–131. Reprinted in Prepared for the Worst. London, Hogarth Press, 1990. 58–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hjelmslev, Louis (1961) Prolegomena to a Theory of Language. Madison, University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
HMSO (Her Majesty's Stationery Office) (2013) The Report of the Detainee Inquiry. UK, The Stationery Office Limited.
Hochmann, Jean-Rémy & Mehler, Jacques (2013) “Recent findings about language acquisition.” In Piattelli-Palmarini, & Berwick, : 107–114.
Hockett, Charles F. (1942) “A system of descriptive phonology.” Language 18: 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hockett, Charles F. (1968) The State of the Art. The Hague, Mouton.Google Scholar
Hockney, Donald (1975) “The bifurcation of scientific theories and indeterminacy of translation.” Philosophy of Science 42: 411–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, Nicholas (2003) “In the war whorehouse.” Index on Censorship 32(3): 36–43.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Stanley, Huntington, Samuel P., May, Ernest R., Neustadt, Richard N. & Schelling, Thomas C. (1981) “Vietnam reappraised.” International Security 6(1): 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstadter, Douglas & Herkewitz, William (2014) “Why Watson and Siri are not real AI: Interview with Douglas Hofstadter.” Popular Mechanics, February 10, 2014.
Holder, Eric (2012) “Statement of Attorney General Eric Holder on closure of investigation into the interrogation of certain detainees.” US Justice Department website, August 30, 2012. www.justice.gov/opa/pr/statement-attorney-general-eric-holder-closure-investigation-interrogation-certain-detainees.
Holmberg, Anders (2010) “Parameters in Minimalist theory: The case of Scandinavian.” Theoretical Linguistics 36: 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hook, Sidney (ed.) (1969) Language and Philosophy: A Symposium. New York, New York University Press.Google Scholar
Hookway, Christopher (1994) “Quine, Willard van Orman.” In Guttenplan, : 520–525.
Hornstein, Norbert (2009) A Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
*Hornstein, Norbert (2013) “Three grades of grammatical involvement: syntax from a Minimalist perspective.” Mind & Language 28: 392–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert, Nunes, Jairo & Grohmann, Kleanthes (2005) Understanding Minimalism. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert & Weinberg, Amy (1995) “The empty category principle.” In Webelhuth, , 1995a: 241–296.
Horwich, Paul (2003) “Meaning and its place in the language faculty.” In Antony, & Hornstein, : 162–178.CrossRef
Howe, Michael (1989) Fragments of Genius. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Huck, Geoffrey and Goldsmith, John (1995) Ideology and Linguistic Theory: Noam Chomsky and the Deep Structure Debates. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Huettel, Scott (2006) “Neuroimaging methods.” Available at: www.phillipsexton.com/uploads/1/6/2/2/16224032/neuro_imaging.pdf.
Huff, Toby (2011) Intellectual Curiosity and the Scientific Revolution: A Global Perspective. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hughes, Samuel (2001) “Speech.” The Pennsylvania Gazette, July/August 2001; pp. 39–45.
Hull, Clark Leonard (1943) Principles of Behavior: An Introduction to Behavior Theory. New York, D. Appleton-Century.Google Scholar
Humboldt, Wilhelm (1993) The Limits of State Action. Edited with an introduction and notes by Burrow, John W.. Indianapolis Liberty Fund. (First published 1969, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.)Google Scholar
Hurford, James (1991) “The evolution of the critical period for language acquisition.” Cognition 40: 159–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hurst, Jane, Baraitser, Michael, Auger, E., Graham, F. & Norell, S. (1990) “An extended family with an inherited speech disorder.” Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 32: 347–355.Google ScholarPubMed
Hyams, Nina (1986) Language Acquisition and the Theory of Parameters. Dordrecht, Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ienaga, Saburo (1998) “Turning the page.” Index on Censorship 27(3): 48–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ienaga, Saburo (2001) Japan's Past, Japan's Future: One Historian's Odyssey. Trans. Minear, Richard H.. Oxford, Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Institute for Global Labour and Human Rights. (2014). “Rana plaza: A look back, and forward.” Retrieved December 31, 2014, from www.globallabourrights.org/alerts/rana-plaza-bangladesh-anniversary-a-look-back-and-forward.
Iten, Corinne (2005) Linguistic Meaning, Truth Conditions and Relevance: The Case of Concessives. New York, Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray (1972) Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray (1997) The Architecture of the Language Faculty. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray (2002) Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray & Pinker, Steven (2005) “The nature of the language faculty and its implications for evolution of language.” Cognition 97(2): 211–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacob, François (1977) “Evolution and tinkering.” Science 196: 1161–1166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacob, Pierre (2010) “Intentionality.” In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/intentionality.
Jakobson, Roman (1941) Kindersprache, Aphasie und allgemeine Lautgesetze. Uppsala, Almqvist & Wiksell. English translation: Allan Keiler (1968) Child Language, Aphasia and Phonological Universals. The Hague, Mouton.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Lyle (2000) Biolinguistics: Exploring the Biology of Language. Cambridge, Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jerne, Niels K. (1985) “The generative grammar of the immune system” (Nobel lecture). Science 229: 1057–1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, David & Lappin, Shalom (1997) “A critique of the Minimalist Program.” Linguistics and Philosophy 20: 272–333.Google Scholar
Johnson, Kent (2007a) “Tacit and accessible understanding of language.” Synthèse 156(2): 253–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Kent (2007b) “The legacy of methodological dualism.” Mind & Language 22(4): 366–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Mark & Morton, John (1991) Biology and Cognitive Development: The Case of Face Recognition. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Johnson, Robert (2014) “Kant's moral philosophy.” In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-moral.
Johnston, David & Savage, Charlie (2009) “Obama reluctant to look into Bush programs.” New York Times, January 11, 2009, p. A1.
Joordens, Josephine C. A., d'Errico, Francesco, Wesselingh, Frank P., Munro, Stephen, Vos, John de, Wallinga, Jakob, et al. (2015) “Homo erectus at Trinil on Java used shells for tool production and engraving.” Nature 518: 228–231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joos, Martin (ed.) (1957) Readings in Linguistics. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kager, René (1999) Optimality Theory. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kam, Xuân-Nga Cao & Fodor, Janet Dean (2013) “Children's acquisition of syntax: Simple models are too simple.” In Piattelli-Palmarini, & Berwick, : 43–60.
Kam, Xuân-Nga Cao, Stoyneshka, Iglika, Tornyova, Lidiya, Fodor, Janet D. & Sakas, William G. (2008) “Bigrams and the richness of the stimulus.” Cognitive Science 32(4): 771–787.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kandybowicz, Jason (2009) “Embracing edges: syntactic and phono-syntactic edge sensitivity in Nupe.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 27: 305–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel ([1785] 2005) The Moral Law (or Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals). Translated by Paton, H. J.. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Abby (forthcoming) Myths and the Science of Language. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Karimi, Simin (ed.) (2003) Word Order and Scrambling. Oxford, Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, Annette (1992a) Beyond Modularity. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, Annette (1992b) “Abnormal phenotypes and the challenges they pose to connectionist models of development.” Technical Report PDP.CNS.92.7, Carnegie Mellon University.
Karmiloff-Smith, Annette, Klima, Edward, Grant, Julia & Baron-Cohen, Simon (1995) “Is there a social module? Language, face processing, and theory of mind in individuals with Williams syndrome.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 7: 196–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasher, Asa (1991a) The Chomskyan Turn. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kasher, Asa (1991b) “Pragmatics and Chomsky's research program.” In Kasher, (1991a): 122–149.
Katz, Jerrold (1981) Language and Other Abstract Objects. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold (ed.) (1985) The Philosophy of Linguistics. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold (1996) “The unfinished Chomskyan revolution.” Mind & Language 11: 270–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Jerrold & Postal, Paul (1964) An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Descriptions. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard (1994) The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard (1996) “Microparametric syntax: some introductory remarks.” In Black, James & Motapanyane, Virginia (eds.), Microparametric Syntax and Dialect Variation. Amsterdam, John Benjamins. ix–xvii.Google Scholar
Keita, S. O. Y., Kittles, R. A., Royal, C. D. M., Bonney, G. E., Furbert-Harris, P., Dunston, G. M. & Rotimi, C. N. (2004) “Conceptualizing human variation.” Nature Genetics 36(11 Suppl): S17–S20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kibbee, Douglas A. (ed.) (2010) Chomskyan (R)Evolutions. Amsterdam–Philadelphia, John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiernan, Ben (2005) “The Cambodian genocide and imperial culture.” Aztag Daily/Armenian Weekly April 2005: 20–21.
Kim, Jaegwon (2004) “The mind–body problem at century's turn.” In Leiter, Brian (ed.), The Future for Philosophy. Oxford, Clarendon Press. 129–152.Google Scholar
Kimmelman, Vadim (2012) “Word order in Russian Sign Language.” Sign Language Studies 12: 414–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (1989) “Explanatory unification and the causal structure of the world.” In Kitcher, Philip & Salmon, Wesley (eds.), Scientific Explanation. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 13. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press. 410–505.Google Scholar
Klima, Edward & Bellugi, Ursula (1966) “Syntactic regularities in the speech of children.” In Lyons, John & Wales, Roger (eds.), Psycholinguistics Papers. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Knecht, Stefan, Deppe, Michael, Dräger, B, Bobe, L, Lohmann, H, Ringelstein, Bernd & Henningsen, H. (2000) “Language lateralization in healthy right-handers.” Brain 123(Pt 1): 74–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knecht, Stefan, Dräger, B., Deppe, Michael, Bobe, L., Lohmann, H., Flöel, Agnes, Ringelstein, Bernd & Henningsen, H. (2000) “Handedness and hemispheric language dominance in healthy humans.” Brain 123 (Pt 12): 2512–2518.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knecht, Stefan, Flöel, Agnes, Drager, B., Breitenstein, C., Sommer, J., Henningsen, H., Ringelstein, Bernd & Pascual-Leone, A. (2002) “Degree of language lateralization determines susceptibility to unilateral brain lesions.” Nat Neurosci 5(7): 695–699.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koyré, Alexandre (1968) Metaphysics and Measurement: Essays in Scientific Revolution. London, Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Kripke, Saul (1982) Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony (1989) “Function and grammar in the history of English periphrastic do.” In Fasold, Ralph & Schiffrin, Deborah (eds.), Language Variation and Change. Philadelphia, John Benjamins. 199–244.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony (2001) “Syntactic change”. In Baltin, & Collins, : 699–729.CrossRef
Kroch, Anthony (2002) “Variation and change in the historical syntax of English.” Paper presented at the LAGB, UMIST, September 2002.
Krugman, Paul (2011) “Graduates versus oligarchs.” The Conscience of a Liberal blog, November 1, 2011. http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/11/01/graduates-versus-oligarchs/.
Krugman, Paul (2012) “But The Top 0.1 Percent Isn't Diverse.” The Conscience of a Liberal blog, January 15, 2012. http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/15/but-the-top-0-1-percent-isnt-diverse/.
Krugman, Paul (2014) “Inequality and economic performance.” The Conscience of a Liberal blog, December 2, 2014. http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/12/02/inequality-and-economic-performance/.
Kuhn, Thomas S. (1957) The Copernican Revolution: Planetary Astronomy in the Development of Western Thought. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lai, Cecilia, Fisher, Simon, Hurst, Jane, Vargha-Khadem, Faraneh & Monaco, Anthony (2001) “A novel forkhead-domain gene is mutated in a severe speech and language disorder.” Nature 413: 519–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanchester, John (2010) Whoops!: Why Everyone Owes Everyone and No One Can Pay. London, Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Lappin, Shalom, Levine, Robert & Johnson, David (2000) “The structure of unscientific revolutions.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 665–671.Google Scholar
Larson, Richard & Segal, Gabriel (1995) Knowledge of Meaning. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lashley, Karl S. (1951) “The problem of serial order in behaviour.” In Jeffress, Lloyd A. (ed.), Cerebral Mechanisms in Behavior: The Hixon Symposium. New York, Wiley. 112–135.Google Scholar
Lasnik, Howard (2001) “Derivation and representation in modern transformational syntax.” In Baltin, & Collins, : 62–88.CrossRef
Lasnik, Howard (2002) “The Minimalist Program in syntax.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6: 432–437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lasnik, Howard (with Depiante, Marcela and Stepanov, Arthur) (2000) Syntactic Structures Revisited: Contemporary Lectures on Classic Transformational Theory. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
*Lasnik, Howard & Lohndal, Terje (2013) “Brief overview of the history of generative syntax.” In den Dikken, : 26–60.CrossRef
Lassiter, Daniel (2008) “Semantic externalism, linguistic variation, and sociolinguistic accommodation.” Mind & Language 23: 607–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, Joerg (2001) “Onkel Noam aus dem Netz.” Die Zeit, July 26, 2001.
Laurence, Stephen & Margolis, Eric (1999) “Concepts and cognitive science.” In Margolis, Eric & Laurence, Stephen (eds.), Concepts: Core Readings. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press. 3–82.Google Scholar
Leben, Derek (2015) “Neoclassical concepts.” Mind & Language, 30(1), 44–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledford, Heidi (2013) “Seed-patent case in Supreme Court: Loss of patent control could rekindle ‘terminator’ technology.” Nature 494: 289–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Lees, Robert (1957) Review of Chomsky, 1957. Language 33: 375–408. [A laudatory review that brought Chomsky instant recognition.]Google Scholar
*Lees, Robert (1960) The Grammar of English Nominalizations. Bloomington, IN,University Press.Google Scholar
Le Guin, Ursula K. (1968) A Wizard of Earthsea. Berkeley, CA, Parnassus Press.Google Scholar
Leier, James Mark (2006) Bakunin: The Creative Passion. New York, Thomas Dunne Books/St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Lenneberg, Eric (1967) Biological Foundations of Language. New York, Wiley.Google Scholar
Leonard, Laurence (1996) “Characterizing specific language impairment: a crosslinguistic perspective.” In Rice, Mabel (ed.), Towards a Genetics of Language. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum. 243–256.Google Scholar
Levelt, Willem (1974) Formal Grammars in Linguistics and Psycholinguistics, Vol. 1: An Introduction to the Theory of Formal Languages and Automata. The Hague, Mouton.Google Scholar
Levelt, Willem (2013) A History of Psycholinguistics: The Pre-Chomskyan Era. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Levi, Primo (1988) The Drowned and the Saved. London, Michael Joseph.Google Scholar
Levi, Primo (1990) The Mirror Maker, trans. Rosenthal, R.. London, Minerva.Google Scholar
Levine, Joseph (1983) “Materialism and qualia: The explanatory gap.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 64: 354–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen (2000) Presumptive Meanings. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. & Evans, Nicholas (2010) “Time for a sea-change in linguistics: Response to comments on ‘The Myth of Language Universals’.” Lingua 120(12): 2733–2758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David (1969) Convention: A Philosophical Study. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, David (1975) “Languages and language.” In Gunderson, Keith (ed.), Language, Mind, and Knowledge. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press. 3–35.Google Scholar
Lewis, Shevaun & Phillips, Colin (2015) “Aligning grammatical theories and language processing models.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 44(1): 27–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewontin, Richard Charles (2006) “Confusions about human races” (Essay on a web forum organized by the Social Science Research Council, USA). http://raceandgenomics.ssrc.org/Lewontin/.
Lidz, Jeffrey and Gleitman, Lila (2004) “Yes, we still need Universal Grammar.” Cognition 94: 85–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lidz, Jeffrey & Williams, Alexander (2009) “Constructions on holiday.” Cognitive Linguistics 20(1): 177–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, Philip (2001) “On the subcortical bases of the evolution of language.” In Trabant, Jürgen and Ward, Sean (eds.), New Essays on the Origin of Language. Mouton. 21–40.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David (1991) How to set Parameters: Arguments from Language Change. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Longobardi, Giuseppe (2014) “Darwin's last challenge.” Paper presented to the Philological Society, London, February 7, 2014.
Ludlow, Peter (2003) “Referential semantics for I-languages?” In Antony, & Hornstein, : 140–161.
Lycan, William G. (2003) “Chomsky on the mind-body problem.” In Antony, & Hornstein, : 11–28.CrossRef
Lyons, John (1970) Chomsky. Fontana Modern Masters Series. London, Fontana-Collins.Google Scholar
Lyons, John (1995) Linguistic Semantics: An Introduction. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacFarquhar, Larissa (2003) “The Devil's accountant.” The New Yorker, March 31, 2003, pp. 64–79.
MacWhinney, Brian (1995) The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian (2010) “A tale of two paradigms.” In Keil, Michèle & Hickmann, Maya (eds.), Language Acquisition across Linguistic and Cognitive Systems. Amsterdam, John Benjamins. 17–32.Google Scholar
Mailer, Norman (1968) The Armies of the Night. London, Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Manzini, Rita (1992) Locality: A Theory and Some of its Empirical Consequences. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Manzini, Rita & Savoia, Leonardo (2007) A Unification of Morphology and Syntax: Investigations into Romance and Albanian Dialects. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec (1995) “The Minimalist Program.” In Webelhuth, , 1995a: 349–382.
Marcus, Gary (1998) “Can connectionism save constructivism?Cognition 66: 153–182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marcus, Gary (2013) “Evolution, memory, and the nature of syntactic representation.” In Bolhuis, Johan and Everaert, Martin (eds.), Birdsong, Speech and Language: Exploring the Evolution of Mind and Brain. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press. 27–44.Google Scholar
Marcus, Gary & Fisher, Simon (2003) “FOXP2 in focus: what can genes tell us about speech and language?Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7: 257–262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marcus, Mitchell (1980) A Theory of Syntactic Recognition for Natural Language. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Markie, Peter (2013) “Rationalism vs. empiricism.” In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2013/entries/rationalism-empiricism.
Marr, David (1982) Vision. New York, W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Marshack, Alexander (1985) Hierarchical Evolution of the Human Capacity: The Paleolithic Evidence. New York, American Museum of Natural History.Google Scholar
Marshall, John (1980) “The new organology.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3(01): 23–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Paul (1990) “Chomsky's anarchism.” Bulletin of Anarchist Research 22: 22–27.Google Scholar
Marty, Dick (2006) “Alleged secret detentions and unlawful inter-state transfers of detainees involving Council of Europe member states.” Report to the Council of Europe Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights, June 12, 2006.
Matthews, Robert (1998) “Take a spin.” New Scientist 2123: 24–28.Google Scholar
Mayberry, Rachel (1993) “First-language acquisition after childhood differs from second-language acquisition: the case of American Sign Language.” Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 36: 1258–1270.Google ScholarPubMed
Mazzetti, Mark (2014) “C.I.A. study of covert aid fueled skepticism about helping Syrian rebels.” New York Times, October 14, 2014, p. A1.
McCarthy, John (2001) A Thematic Guide to Optimality Theory. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCloskey, James (1988) “Syntactic theory.” In Newmeyer, Fritz (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, Vol. 1. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 18–59.Google Scholar
McCloskey, James (2002) “Resumption, successive cyclicity, and the locality of operations.” In Epstein, and Seeley, : 184–226.CrossRef
McDonald, Fritz J. (2009) “Linguistics, psychology, and the ontology of language.” Croatian Journal of Philosophy 27: 291–301.Google Scholar
McGilvray, James (1998) “Meanings are syntactically individuated and found in the head.” Mind & Language 13: 225–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*McGilvray, James (1999) Chomsky: Language, Mind, and Politics. Cambridge, Polity Press. [edition 2013].Google Scholar
*McGilvray, James (ed.) (2005) The Cambridge Companion to Chomsky. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntyre, Alison (2004) “Doctrine of double effect.” In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Revised 2014. Available at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/double-effect/.
McKibben, Bill (2012) “Global warming's terrifying new math.” Rolling Stone, July 19, 2012.
Mepham, David (2013) “Getting to the truth about UK-Gaddafi ties.” Open Democracy, February 1, 2013. Available from www.opendemocracy.net.
Mikhail, John (2011) Elements of Moral Cognition: Rawl's Linguistic Analogy and the Cognitive Science of Moral and Legal Judgment. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikhail, John (2012) “Moral grammar and human rights: Some reflections on cognitive science and enlightenment rationalism.” In Goodman, Ryan, Jinks, Derek & Woods, Andrew K. (eds.), Understanding Social Action, Promoting Human Rights. Oxford, Oxford University Press. 160–198.Google Scholar
Miller, George (1956) “The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on our Capacity for Processing Information.” Psychological Review 63: 81–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, George (1962) “Some psychological studies of grammar.” American Psychologist 1: 748–762.Google Scholar
*Miller, George & Chomsky, Noam (1963) “Finitary models of language users.” In Luce, Duncan, Bush, Robert & Galanter, Eugene (eds.), Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 2. New York, Wiley. 419–492.Google Scholar
Millikan, Ruth Garrett (1984) Language, Thought and Other Biological Categories. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Millikan, Ruth Garrett (2003) “In defense of public language.” In Antony, & Hornstein, : 215–237.CrossRef
Millikan, Ruth Garrett (2005) Language: a Biological Model. Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milsark, Gary (2001) Review of N. Smith, 1999. Language 77: 599–600.CrossRef
*Modgil, Sohan & Modgil, Celia (eds.) (1987) Noam Chomsky: Consensus and Controversy. New York, The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Montalbetti, Mario (1984) After Binding: On the Interpretation of Pronouns. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Montague, Richard (1974) “English as a formal language.” In Thomason, : 188–221. (First published 1970 in B. Visentini et al. (eds.), Linguaggi nella Societa et nella Technica, Milan, Edizioni di Communita. 188–221.)
Moravcsik, Julius (1990) Thought and Language. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Morgan, Gary, Smith, Neil, Tsimpli, Ianthi & Woll, Bencie (2002) “Language against the odds: The learning of British Sign Language by a polyglot savant.” Journal of Linguistics 38:1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moscati, Vincenzo & Rizzi, Luigi (2014) “Agreement configurations in language development: A movement-based complexity metric.” Lingua 140: 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Motlagh, Jason (2014) “A year after Rana Plaza: What hasn't changed since the Bangladesh factory collapse.” Washington Post, April 18, 2014.
Motluk, Alison (1996) “Brain detectives see memories in their true colours.” New Scientist 2040: 16.Google Scholar
Motluk, Alison (1997) “The inner eye has sharper vision.” New Scientist 2087: 18.Google Scholar
Müller, Gereon (2011) Constraints on Displacement: A Phase-based Approach. Amsterdam, John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munger, Michael C. (1996) “Book review: Golden Rule, Ferguson, 1995.” The Independent Review 1(1).Google Scholar
Murphy, Cian (2011) “Chomsky takes Obama to task.” The Guardian, October 13, 2011.
Murray, Craig (2006) Murder in Samarkand: A British Ambassador's Controversial Defiance of Tyranny in the War on Terror. Edinburgh, Mainstream.Google Scholar
Murray, Craig (2014) “Now put Blair and Straw on trial for torture, says diplomat who was fired when he warned Labour Government of UK collusion with US abuse.” Mail on Sunday, December 14, 2014.
Nagel, T. (1969) “Linguistics and epistemology.” In Hook, : 171–181. New York, New York University Press. Reprinted in Harman, 1974: 219–228.
Nagel, T. (1997) The Last Word. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, E. & Brandt, R. (eds.) (1965) Meaning and Knowledge: Systematic Readings in Epistemology. New York, Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
Nederhof, Mark-Jan & Satta, Giorgio (2010) “Theory of parsing.” In Clark, et al.: 105–130.CrossRef
Neeleman, Ad & Weerman, Fred (1997) “L1 and L2 word order acquisition.’’ Language Acquisition 6: 125–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neidle, Carol, Kegl, Judy, MacLaughlin, D., Bahan, B. & Lee, R. (2000) The Syntax of American Sign Language: Functional Categories and Hierarchical Structure. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina (2014) “On the nature of language acquisition mechanisms: Sensitivity to prosody in different modalities.” Paper presented at the Academy Colloquium “The Biology of Language: Evolution, Brain, Development”. Amsterdam, December 2014.
Nevins, Andrew, Pesetsky, David & Rodrigues, Cilene (2009) “Pirahã exceptionality: A reassessment.” Language 85(2): 355–404.Google Scholar
Newbury, D. F. & Monaco, A. P. (2002) “Molecular genetics of speech and language disorders.” Current Opinion in Pediatrics 14: 696–701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newmeyer, Frederick J. (1997) “Genetic dysphasia and linguistic theory.” Journal of Neurolinguistics 10: 47–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J. (2005) Possible and Probable Languages: A Generative Perspective on Linguistic Typology. Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, John (1985) “What was Einstein's Principle of Equivalence?Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 16: 203–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norvig, Peter (2014) “On Chomsky and the two cultures of statistical learning.” Available at: http://norvig.com/chomsky.html.
Nowak, M. & Komarova, N. (2001) “Towards an evolutionary theory of language.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5: 288–295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oborne, Peter (2014) “The Jihadis Return: Isil and the New Sunni Uprising by Patrick Cockburn, review.” The Telegraph, September 25, 2014.
O'Connor, Neil, Smith, Neil, Frith, Chris & Tsimpli, Ianthi-Maria (1994) “Neuropsychology and linguistic talent.” Journal of Neurolinguistics 8: 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odden, David (2013) Introducing Phonology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onishi, K. H. & Baillargeon, R. (2005) “Do 15-month-old infants understand false beliefs?Science 308(5719): 255–258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
*Otero, Carlos (ed.) (1994) Noam Chomsky: Critical Assessments. 4 volumes. London, Routledge. [An excellent source-book of articles and reviews.]Google Scholar
Pais, A. (1982) Subtle is the Lord …: The Science and the Life of Albert Einstein. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, Stephen E. (1999) Vision Science: Photons to Phenomenology. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Papafragou, Anna (1998) “The acquisition of modality: Implications for theories of semantic representation.” Mind & Language 13: 370–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papafragou, Anna (2002) “Mindreading and verbal communication.” Mind & Language 17: 55–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, M. (ed.) (1997) Genetic Dysphasia. Special Issue of Journal of Neuro-linguistics 10: 45–249.
Parry, R. L. (1997) “Japan rejects professor's fight for freedom of speech.’’ The Independent, August 8, 1997.
Partee, Barbara Hall (1971) “On the requirement that transformations preserve meaning.” In Fillmore, C. & Langendoen, T. (eds.), Studies in Linguistic Semantics. New York, Holt, Rinehart & Winston. 1–21.Google Scholar
Partee, Barbara Hall (1975) “Comments on C. J. Fillmore's and N. Chomsky's papers.” In Austerlitz, R. (ed.), The Scope of American Linguistics. Lisse, Peter de Ridder Press. 197–209.Google Scholar
Partee, Barbara Hall (2004) Compositionality in Formal Semantics: Selected Papers. Oxford, Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partlow, Joshua (2014) “Dostum, a former warlord who was once America's man in Afghanistan, may be back.” Washington Post, April 23, 2014.
Pearl, Lisa & Lidz, Jeffrey (2013) “Parameters in language acquisition.” In Boeckx, Cedric and Grohmann, Kleanthes (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Biolinguistics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 129–159.Google Scholar
Pearl, Lisa & Sprouse, Jon (2013) “Syntactic islands and learning biases: Combining experimental syntax and computational modeling to investigate the language acquisition problem.” Language Acquisition 20(1): 23–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Peck, J. (1987) The Chomsky Reader. New York, Pantheon. [An outstanding sourcebook.]Google Scholar
Perfors, Amy, Tenenbaum, Joshua & Regier, Terry (2011) “The learnability of abstract syntactic principles.” Cognition 118(3): 306–338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perfors, Amy, Tenenbaum, Joshua & Wonnacott, Elizabeth (2010) “Variability, negative evidence, and the acquisition of verb argument constructions.” Journal of Child Language 37(3): 607–642.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perlmutter, David (1978) “Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis.” Proceedings of the 4th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics. Society: 157–190.CrossRef
Perlstein, Rick (2013) “Kennedy week: JFK's uncertain path in Vietnam.” The Nation, November 21, 2013.
Perovic, Alexandra (2003) Knowledge of Binding in Down Syndrome: Evidence from English and Serbo-Croatian. PhD Thesis, UCL.
Perrin, Jean Baptiste (1923) Atoms. Translated by Hammick, Dalziel Llewellyn. London, Constable.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David (2000) Phrasal Movement and its Kin. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David (2009) “Against taking linguistic diversity at ‘face value’.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32(05): 464–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pesetsky, David and Torrego, Esther (2007) “The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features.” In Karimi, Simin, Samiian, Vida & Wilkins, Wendy (eds.), Phrasal and Clausal Architecture: Syntactic Derivation and Interpretation. Amsterdam, John Benjamins. 262–294.Google Scholar
Phillips, Colin (1996) Order and Structure. PhD thesis, MIT.
Phillips, Colin (2004) “Linguistics and linking problems”. In Rice, M. & Warren, S. (eds.), Developmental Language Disorders: From Phenotypes to Etiologies. Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 241–287.Google Scholar
Phillips, Colin (2013a) “Parser-grammar relations: We don't understand everything twice.” In Sanz, Montserrat, Laka, Itziar & Tanenhaus, Michael (eds.), Language Down the Garden Path: The Cognitive and Biological Basis for Linguistic Structure. Oxford, Oxford University Press. 294–315Google Scholar
Phillips, Colin (2013b) “On the nature of island constraints. I: Language processing and reductionist accounts.” In Sprouse, Jon & Hornstein, Norbert (eds.), Experimental Syntax and Island Effects. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 64–108.Google Scholar
Phillips, Colin (2013c) “Some arguments and non-arguments for reductionist accounts of syntactic phenomena.” Language and Cognitive Processes 28: 156–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillipson, Gavin (2013) “‘Historic’ Commons’ Syria vote: the constitutional significance (Part I).” UK Constitutional Law Blog, September 19, 2013. Available from http://ukconstitutionallaw.org.
Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B. (1966) The Psychology of the Child. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
*Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (1980) Language and Learning: The Debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
*Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (1989) “Evolution, selection and cognition: from learning to parameter setting in biology and in the study of language.” Cognition 31: 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piattelli-Palmarini, Massimo & Berwick, Robert (eds.) (2013) Rich Languages from Poor Inputs. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Piattelli-Palmarini, Massimo, Uriagereka, Juan & Salaburu, Pello (eds.) (2009) Of Minds and Language: A Dialogue with Noam Chomsky in the Basque Country. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J., Beckman, M. & Ladd, R. (2000) “Conceptual foundations of phonology as a laboratory science.” In Burton-Roberts, Noel, Carr, Philip & Docherty, Gerard J. (eds.), Phonological Knowledge: Conceptual and Empirical Issues. Oxford, Oxford University Press. 273–303.Google Scholar
Pietroski, Paul (2000) “The undeflated domain of semantics.” SATS 1(2): 161–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pietroski, Paul (2003) “Small verbs, complex events: Analyticity without synonymy.” In Antony, & Hornstein, : 179–214.CrossRef
Pietroski, Paul (2005) “Meaning before truth.” In Preyer, Gerhard & Peter, Georg (eds.), Contextualism in Philosophy: Knowledge, Meaning, and Truth. Oxford, Oxford University Press. 255–302.Google Scholar
Pietroski, Paul (2010) “Concepts, meanings and truth: First nature, second nature and hard work.” Mind & Language 25(3): 247–278.Google Scholar
Piketty, Thomas (2014) Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Translated by Goldhammer, Arthur. Cambridge, MA, Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pilger, John (2002) The New Rulers of the World. London, Verso.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven (1994) The Language Instinct. New York, William Morrow.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, Steven (2014) The Sense of Style: The Thinking Person's Guide to Writing in the 21st Century. London, Penguin.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven & Jackendoff, Ray (2005) “The faculty of language: what's special about it?Cognition 95(2): 201–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S. & Prince, A. (1988) “On language and connectionism: analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition.” Cognition 28: 73–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pintzuk, S. (2002) “Verb-object order in Old English: variation as grammatical Competition.” In Lightfoot, D. W. (ed.), Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change. Oxford, Oxford University Press. 276–299.Google Scholar
Plaut, D. (2003) “Connectionist modelling of language: Examples and implications.” In Banich, & Mack, : 143–167.
Poland, Jeff (2003) “Chomsky's challenge to physicalism.” In Antony, & Hornstein, : 29–48.CrossRef
Polanyi, Michael (1967) The Tacit Dimension. London, Routledge & K. Paul.Google Scholar
Polinsky, Maria (2013) “Raising and control.” In den Dikken, : 577–606.CrossRef
Pons, Ferran & Toro, Juan (2010) “Structural generalizations over consonants and vowels in 11-month-old infants.” Cognition 116: 361–367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Popham, Peter (2014) “Hong Kong's protest camps flowered out of a living tradition of democracy.” The Independent, December 11, 2014.
Porter, Eduardo (2014) “Income gap shrinks in Chile, for better or worse.” New York Times, December 2, 2014, p. B1.
Post, E. (1944) “Recursively enumerable sets of positive integers and their decision problems.” Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 50: 284–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Postal, Paul (1974) On Raising: One Rule of English Grammar and its Theoretical Implications. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Postal, Paul (2012). “Two case studies of Chomsky's play acting at linguistics.” Lingbuzz. Retrieved March 28, 2013, from http://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/001686/current.pdf.
Powell, Jonathan (2014) “How to talk to terrorists.” The Guardian, October 7, 2014.
Powell, M. (2002) “An eminence with no shades of gray.” The Washington Post, May 5, 2002.
Premack, D. & Premack, A. (1994) “Moral belief: form versus content.” In Hirschfeld, & Gelman, : 149–168.CrossRef
Price, Cathy (2012) “A review and synthesis of the first 20 years of PET and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language and reading.” NeuroImage 62 (2): 816–847.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pritchett, B. L. (1988) “Garden path phenomena and the grammatical basis of language processing.” Language 64: 539–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey (1979) Rule Interaction and the Organization of a Grammar. New York, Garland.Google Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey (1989) “Formal linguistics meets the boojum.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 7: 137–143.Google Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey K. & Scholz, Barbara C. (2002) “Empirical assessment of stimulus poverty arguments.” The Linguistic Review 18(1–2): 9–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey K. & Scholz, Barbara C. (2003) “Linguistic models.” In Banich, & Mack, : 113–141.
Pullum, Geoffrey & Zwicky, Arnold (1988) “The syntax–phonology interface.” In Newmeyer, Fritz (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, Vol. 1. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 255–280.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary (1962) “Dreaming and ‘depth grammar’.” In Butler, Ronald J. (ed.), Analytical Philosophy: First Series. Oxford, Basil Blackwell. 211–235.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary (1967) “The ‘innateness hypothesis’ and explanatory models in linguistics.” Synthèse 17: 12–22. Reprinted in Searle, 1971: 121–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Quine, Willard van Orman (1960) Word and Object. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
*Quine, Willard van Orman (1969) “Linguistics and philosophy.” In Hook, : 95–98.
*Quine, Willard van Orman (1970) “Methodological reflections on current linguistic theory.” Synthèse 21(3/4): 386–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Quine, Willard van Orman (1972) “Methodological reflections on current linguistic theory.” In Davidson, & Harman, : 442–54. Reprinted in Harman, 1974: 104–117.
*Quine, Willard van Orman (1990) Pursuit of Truth. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Radford, Andrew (1990) Syntactic Theory and the Acquisition of English Syntax. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Radford, Andrew (1997a) Syntactic Theory and the Structure of English. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radford, Andrew (1997b) Syntax: A Minimalist Introduction. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radford, Andrew (2004a) English Syntax: An Introduction. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radford, Andrew (2004b) Minimalist Syntax: Exploring the Structure of English. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radford, Andrew (2009) An Introduction to English Sentence Structure. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Rai, Milan (1995) Chomsky's Politics. London, Verso. [An excellent overview.]Google Scholar
*Rai, Milan (2002) War Plan Iraq: Ten Reasons against War on Iraq. London, Verso.Google Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian (2013) “Argument structure and argument structure alternations.” In den Dikken, : 265–321.CrossRef
Ramscar, Michael, Dye, Melody & McCauley, Stewart (2013) “Error and expectation in language learning: The curious absence of mouses in adult speech.” Language 89: 760–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsey, W., Stich, S. & Garon, J. (1990) “Connectionism, eliminativism and the future of folk psychology.” Philosophical Perspectives 4: 499–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randall, Janet (1990) “Catapults and pendulums: the mechanics of language acquisition.” Linguistics 28: 1381–1406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John (1971) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Reali, Florencia & Christiansen, Morten H. (2005) “Uncovering the richness of the stimulus: structure dependence and indirect statistical evidence.” Cognitive Science 29(6): 1007–1028.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reinhart, Tanya & Reuland, Eric (1993) “Reflexivity.” Linguistic Inquiry 24: 657–720.Google Scholar
Reuland, Eric & Everaert, Martin (2001) “Deconstructing binding.” In Baltin, & Collins, : 634–669.CrossRef
Reuland, Eric & Everaert, Martin (2010) “Reaction to: The Myth of Language Universals and cognitive science – Evans and Levinson's cabinet of curiosities: Should we pay the fee?Lingua 120: 2713–2716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rey, Georges (1994) “Dennett's unrealistic psychology.” Philosophical Topics 22(1/2): 259–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rey, Georges (1997) Contemporary Philosophy of Mind: A Contentiously Classical Approach. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rey, Georges (2003a) “Chomsky, intentionality, and a CRTT.” In Antony, & Hornstein, : 105–139.
Rey, Georges (2003b) “Intentional content and a Chomskyan linguistics.” In Barber, Alex (ed.), Epistemology of Language. Oxford, Oxford University Press. 140–186.Google Scholar
Rey, Georges (2003) “The analytic/synthetic distinction.” In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Revised 2013. Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/analytic-synthetic.
Rey, Georges (2012) “Externalism and inexistence in early content.” In Schantz, Richard (ed.), Prospects for Meaning. Berlin, De Gruyter. 503–529.Google Scholar
Rey, Georges (2014a) “Innate and learned: Carey, Mad Dog Nativism, and the poverty of stimuli and analogies (yet again).” Mind & Language 29(2): 109–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rey, Georges (2014b) “The possibility of a naturalistic Cartesianism regarding intuitions and introspection.” In Haug, Matthew (ed.), Philosophical Methodology: The Armchair or the Laboratory?London, Routledge. 243–267.Google Scholar
Richards, Marc (2011) “Deriving the edge: what's in a phase?Syntax 14(1): 74–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riegler, Alexander (2001) “Towards a radical constructivist understanding of science.” Foundations of Science 6(1–3): 1–30.Google Scholar
Ritter, Nancy (ed.) (2002) A Review of “the Poverty of Stimulus Argument”. Special Issue of The Linguistic Review.
Rizzi, Luigi (1982) Issues in Italian Syntax. Dordrecht, Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Rizzi, Luigi (1990) Relativized Minimality. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi (1997) “The fine structure of the left periphery.” In Haegeman, Liliane (ed.), Elements of Grammar: A Handbook of Generative Syntax. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers. 281–337.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi (2001) “Relativized Minimality effects.” In Baltin, & Collins, : 89–110.CrossRef
Rizzi, Luigi (2004) “Locality and left periphery.” In Belletti, : 223–251.
Rizzi, Luigi (2009) “The discovery of language invariance and variation, and its relevance for the cognitive sciences.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32(05): 467–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Rizzi, Luigi (ed.) (2013a) Syntax and Cognition: Core Ideas and Results in Syntax. Special issue of Lingua (Vol. 130).
Rizzi, Luigi (2013b) “Locality.” Lingua 130: 169–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian (1997) Comparative Syntax. London, Arnold.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian (2001) “Head movement.” In Baltin, & Collins, : 113–147.CrossRef
Roberts, Ian & Holmberg, Anders (2005) “On the role of parameters in Universal Grammar: A reply to Newmeyer.” In Broekhuis, Hans, Corver, Norbert, Everaert, Martin & Koster, Jan (eds.), Organising Grammar: A Festschrift for Henk van Riemsdijk. Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter. 538–553.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian & Roussou, Anna (2003) Syntactic Change: A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalization. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robins, R. H. (1989) General Linguistics: An Introductory Survey. edition. London, Longman.Google Scholar
Roca, I. (ed.) (1990) Logical Issues in Language Acquisition. Dordrecht, Foris.Google Scholar
Roca, I. & Johnson, W. (1999) Course in Phonology. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rocker, R. (1938) Anarcho-syndicalism. London, Secker & Warburg.Google Scholar
Roeper, T. & Williams, E. (eds.) (1987) Parameter Setting. Dordrecht, Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rondal, J. (1995) Exceptional Language Development in Down's Syndrome. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rondal, J. & Comblain, A. (1996) “Language in adults with Down's Syndrome.” Down's Syndrome: Research and Practice 4 (1): 3–14.Google Scholar
Rooryck, Johan, Smith, Neil, Liptak, Anikó & Blakemore, Diane (2010) “Editorial introduction to the special issue of Lingua on Evans & Levinson's ‘The myth of language universals’.” Lingua 120: 2651–2656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rooryck, J. & Zaring, L. (eds.) (1996) Phrase Structure and the Lexicon. Dordrecht, Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard (ed.) (1967) The Linguistic Turn: Recent Essays in Philosophical Method. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, Peter S. (1967) The Grammar of English Predicate Complement Constructions. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
*Ross, J. R. (1967) “Constraints on Variables in Syntax.” Ph.D. thesis, MIT. Published in 1986 as Infinite Syntax. Norwood, NJ, Ablex Publishing Corporation. [A seminal contribution to early generative syntax.]
Rousseau, J.-J. (1755) Discourse on the Origins and Foundations of Inequality among Men. Translated in Masters, R. D. (ed.) (1964), The First and Second Discourses. New York, St Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Roy, Arundhati (2003) “The loneliness of Noam Chomsky.” Available at: www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=11&ItemID=4116.
Rugg, Michael (1999) “Functional neuroimaging in cognitive neuroscience”. In Brown, C. & Hagoort, P. (eds.), The Neurocognition of Language. Oxford, Oxford University Press. 15–36.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand (1912) “On the notion of cause.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society New Series 13: 1–26.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand (1927) The Analysis of Matter. London, Paul, Trench, Trubner.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand (1948) Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits. London, Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert (1949) The Concept of Mind. London, Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert (1961) “Use, usage and meaning.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 35: 223–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rymer, R. (1993) Genie: A Scientific Tragedy. New York, Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
Sacks, Oliver (1985) The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat. New York, Summit Books.Google Scholar
Saffran, E. (2003) “Evidence from language breakdown: Implications for the neural and functional organization of language.” In Banich, & Mack, : 251–281.
Saffran, Jenny, Aslin, Richard & Newport, Elissa (1996) “Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants.” Science 274: 1926–1928.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Safir, Ken (2013) “Syntax, binding, and patterns of anaphora.” In den Dikken, : 515–576.CrossRef
Said, Edward W. (2004) From Oslo to Iraq and the Road Map. New York, Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Sakas, William Gregory & Fodor, Janet Dean (2012) “Disambiguating syntactic triggers.” Language Acquisition 19(2): 83–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmon, Wesley (1989) “Four decades of scientific explanation.” In Kitcher, Philip & Salmon, Wesley (eds.), Scientific Explanation. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 13. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press. 3–219.Google Scholar
Sampson, Geoffrey (1989) “Language acquisition: growth or learning?Philosophical Papers 18(3): 203–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, Geoffrey (1999) Educating Eve: The “Language Instinct” Debate. London, Cassell.Google Scholar
Samuels, Richard (2004) “Innateness in cognitive science.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8(3): 136–141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Samuels, Richard (2008) “Is innateness a confused concept?” In Carruthers, Peter, Laurence, Stephen & Stich, Stephen (eds.), The Innate Mind, Vol. 3: Foundations and the Future. Oxford, Oxford University Press. 17–36.Google Scholar
Sandler, Wendy & Lillo-Martin, Diane (2006) Sign Language and Linguistic Universals. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sands, Philippe (2005) Lawless World: America and the Making and Breaking of Global Rules. London, Penguin.Google Scholar
Sands, Philippe (2008) Torture Team: Rumsfeld's Memo and the Betrayal of American Values. New York, Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sanford, Anthony & Sturt, Patrick (2002) “Depth of processing in language comprehension: Not noticing the evidence.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6: 382–386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sapir, Edward (1929) “The status of linguistics as a science.” Language 5: 207–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Satel, Sally L. & Lilienfeld, Scott O. (2013) Brainwashed: The Seductive Appeal of Mindless Neuroscience. New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar
Savin, H. & Perchonock, E. (1965) “Grammatical structure and the immediate recall of English sentences.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 4: 348–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawyer, Keith (2011) “The cognitive neuroscience of creativity: A critical review.” Creativity Research Journal 23(2): 137–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schacter, D. L., Reiman, E., Curran, T., Yun, L. S., Bandy, D., McDermott, K. B. & Roediger, H. L. III (1996) “Neuroanatomical correlates of veridical and illusory recognition memory: evidence from Positron Emission Tomography.” Neuron 17: 267–274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schlosser, Eric (2013) Command and Control: Nuclear Weapons, the Damascus Accident, and the Illusion of Safety. New York, Penguin.Google Scholar
Scholz, Barbara C., Pelletier, Francis Jeffry & Pullum, Geoffrey K. (2014) “Philosophy of Linguistics.” In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/linguistics.
Scholz, Barbara C. & Pullum, Geoffrey K. (2006) “Irrational nativist exuberance.” In Stainton, Robert (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Cognitive Science. Oxford, Blackwell. 59–80.Google Scholar
Schütze, Carson (1996) The Empirical Basis of Linguistics: Grammaticality Judgments and Linguistic Methodology. Chicago, Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Searchinger, Gene (dir.) (1995) The Human Language Series, Part 1 – Discovering the Human Language: “Colorless green ideas.”New York, Equinox Films Inc.Google Scholar
Searle, John (ed.) (1971) The Philosophy of Language. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John (1972) “Chomsky's revolution in linguistics.” The New York Review of Books. Reprinted in Harman, 1974: 2–33.
Serle, Jack (2014) “Only 4% of drone victims in Pakistan named as al Qaeda.” Bureau of Investigative Journalism website, October 16, 2014.
Shaer, Benjamin (2009) “German and English left-peripheral elements and the ‘orphan’ analysis of non-integration.” In Shaer, Benjamin, Cook, Philippa, Frey, Werner & Maienborn, Claudia (eds.), Dislocated Elements in Discourse: Syntactic, Semantic, and Pragmatic Perspectives. London, Routledge. 366–397.Google Scholar
Shallice, Tim (1988) From Neuropsychology to Mental Structure. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, K. & Caramazza, Alfonso (2003) “The representation of grammatical categories in the brain.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7: 201–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, Michael (2007) “Universal genome in the origin of metazoa: thoughts about evolution.” Cell Cycle 6(15): 1873–1877.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, Amrit (2013) Globalizing Torture: CIA Secret Detention and Extraordinary Rendition. New York, Open Society Foundations.Google Scholar
Skinner, Burrhus F. (1948) Walden Two. New York, Macmillan.Google Scholar
Skinner, Burrhus F. (1957) Verbal Behavior. New York, Appleton Century Crofts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Burrhus F. (1963) “Behaviorism at fifty: The rapid growth of a scientific analysis of behavior calls for a restatement of the philosophy of psychology.” Science 140(3570): 951–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Burrhus F. (1971) Beyond Freedom and Dignity. New York, Knopf.Google Scholar
Smart, John Jamieson Carswell (1963) Philosophy and Scientific Realism. London, Routledge & K. Paul.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam ([1776] 1976) An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Amahl (1988) “Language acquisition: learnability, maturation and the fixing of parameters.” Cognitive Neuropsychology 5: 235–265.Google Scholar
Smith, Barry C. (2008) “What remains of our knowledge of language? Reply to Collins.” Croatian Journal of Philosophy 22: 57–76.Google Scholar
Smith, Neil (1964) A Phonological and Grammatical Study of the Verb in Nupe. PhD Thesis, University of London.
Smith, Neil (1967) An Outline Grammar of Nupe. London, School of Oriental and African Studies.Google Scholar
Smith, Neil (1973) The Acquisition of Phonology: A Case Study. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Neil (ed.) (1982) Mutual Knowledge. London– New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Neil (1983) Speculative Linguistics. (An inaugural lecture delivered at University College London, published by the College.)
Smith, Neil (1985) “Chomsky, Noam.” In Kuper, A. & Kuper, J. (eds.), The Social Science Encyclopaedia. London, Routledge & Kegan Paul. 105–106.Google Scholar
Smith, Neil (1986) Review of Berwick & Weinberg, 1984. Journal of Linguistics 22: 222–229.Google Scholar
Smith, Neil (1987) “Universals and typology.” In Modgil, & Modgil, : 57–66.
Smith, Neil (1988) “Principles, parameters and pragmatics.” [Review article on Chomsky, 1986.] Journal of Linguistics 24: 189–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Neil (1989) The Twitter Machine: Reflections on Language. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Smith, Neil (1990) “Can pragmatics fix parameters?” In Roca, : 277–289.
Smith, Neil (1994a) “Competence and performance.” In Asher, R. E. (ed.), The Encyclopaedia of Language and Linguistics, Vol. 2. Oxford, Pergamon. 645–648.Google Scholar
Smith, Neil (1994b) Review article on A. Karmiloff-Smith, 1992. European Journal of Disorders of Communication 29: 95–105.Google Scholar
Smith, Neil (1996a) “Tadoma.” Glot International 2 (3): 5. Reprinted in Smith, 2002b.Google Scholar
Smith, Neil (1996b) “Godshit.” Glot International 2 (5): 10. [Reprinted in Smith, 2002b.]Google Scholar
Smith, Neil (1997) “Structural eccentricities.” Glot International 2 (8): 7. [Reprinted in Smith, 2002b.]Google Scholar
Smith, Neil (1998) “Jackdaws, sex and language acquisition.” Glot International 3 (7): 7. Reprinted in Smith, 2002b.Google Scholar
Smith, Neil (1999). Chomsky: Ideas and Ideals. edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Neil (2001) “Backlash.” Glot International 5: 169–171. Reprinted in revised form in 2005.Google Scholar
Smith, Neil (2002a) “Frogs, parrots, grooming, the basal ganglia and language.” Glot International 6: 168–170.Google Scholar
Smith, Neil (2002b) Language, Bananas and Bonobos: Linguistic Problems, Puzzles and Polemics. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Smith, Neil (2002c) “Modules, modals, maths & the mind.” Glot International 6: 248–250.Google Scholar
Smith, Neil (2002d) “Wonder.” Glot International 6: 55–57.Google Scholar
Smith, Neil (2002e) “Personal history”. In Brown, K. & Law, V. (eds.), Linguistics in Britain: Personal Histories. Publications of the Philological Society, 36. Oxford, Blackwell. 262–273.Google Scholar
Smith, Neil (2003a) “Dissociation and modularity: Reflections on language and mind.” In Banich, & Mack, : 87–111.
Smith, Neil (2003b) “Linguistics by numbers.” Glot International 7: 110–112.Google Scholar
Smith, Neil (2003c) “Are gucks mentally represented?Glot International 7: 164–166.Google Scholar
Smith, Neil (2003d) “Modularity and modality in ‘second’ language learning: The case of a polyglot savant”. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics 3:411–426.Google Scholar
Smith, Neil (2003e) “Representations and responsibilities.” Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics 3: 527–545.Google Scholar
Smith, Neil (2005) Language, Frogs and Savants. Oxford, Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Neil (2008) Review of Noam Chomsky, What We Say Goes. Penguin. THES, March 13, 2008.
Smith, Neil (2010) Acquiring Phonology: A Cross-generational Case Study. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Neil (2011) “Modularity.” In Hogan, P. (ed.), Cambridge Encyclopedia of the Language Sciences. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 510–511.Google Scholar
Smith, Neil (2013) “Parametric variation and Darwin's problem.” Available at: http://facultyoflanguage.blogspot.co.uk/2013/01/parametric-variation-and-darwins-problem.html.
Smith, Neil & Cormack, Annabel (2002) “Parametric poverty.” Glot International 6: 285–287.Google Scholar
Smith, Neil, Hermelin, Beate & Tsimpli, Ianthi (2003) “Dissociation of social affect and theory of mind in a case of Asperger's Syndrome.” University College London Working Papers in Linguistics 15: 357–377.Google Scholar
Smith, Neil & Law, Ann (2009) “On parametric (and non-parametric) variation.” Biolinguistics 3: 332–343.Google Scholar
Smith, Neil & Tsimpli, Ianthi-Maria (1995) The Mind of a Savant: Language-learning and Modularity. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Smith, Neil & Tsimpli, Ianthi-Maria (1997) “Reply to Bates’ review of Smith & Tsimpli, 1995.” The International Journal of Bilingualism 2: 180–186.Google Scholar
Smith, Neil, Tsimpli, Ianthi-Maria, Morgan, Gary & Woll, Bencie (2011) The Signs of a Savant: Language against the Odds. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Neil, Tsimpli, Ianthi-Maria & Ouhalla, Jamal (1993) “Learning the impossible: The acquisition of possible and impossible languages by a polyglot savant.” Lingua 91: 279–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Smith, Neil & Wilson, Deirdre (1979) Modern Linguistics: The Results of Chomsky's Revolution. Harmondsworth, Penguin.Google Scholar
*Smith, Neil & Wilson, Deirdre (1992) “Introduction to Relevance Theory.” Special Issue of Lingua, ed. Wilson, D. & Smith, N.. 87: 1–10.Google Scholar
Smolensky, Paul (1994) “Computational models of mind.” In Guttenplan, : 176–185.
Smolensky, Paul & Dupoux, Emmanuel (2009) “Universals in cognitive theories of language.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32(05): 468–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soames, Scott (1984) “Linguistics and psychology.” Linguistics and Philosophy 7(2): 155–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, Elliot (1980) “Representation and psychological reality.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3: 38–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southgate, Victoria, Senju, A. & Csibra, Gergely (2007) “Action anticipation through attribution of false belief by 2-year-olds.” Psychological Science 18(7): 587–592.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spelke, Elizabeth (2003a) “Core knowledge.” In Kanwisher, Nancy & Duncan, John (eds.), Functional Neuroimaging of Visual Cognition. Oxford, Oxford University Press. 29–55.Google Scholar
Spelke, Elizabeth (2003b) “What makes us smart? Core knowledge and natural language.” In Gentner, Dedre & Goldin-Meadow, Susan (eds.), Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press. 277–311.Google Scholar
Spelke, Elizabeth (2010) “Innateness, choice and language”. In Bricmont, & Franck, : 203–210.CrossRef
Spelke, Elizabeth & Tsivkin, Sanna (2001) “Initial knowledge and conceptual change: Space and number.” In Bowerman, Melissa & Levinson, Steven (eds.), Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 70–97.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan (1994) “Understanding verbal understanding.” In Khalfa, Jean (ed.), What is Intelligence?Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 179–198.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan (2014) “What scientific idea is ready for retirement? The standard approach to meaning.” Retrieved March 19, 2014, from www.edge.org/response-detail/25378.
*Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deirdre (1995) Relevance: Communication and Cognition. edition, with added Postface. Oxford, Blackwell. (First edition 1986.)Google Scholar
*Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deirdre (1998) “The mapping between the mental and the public lexicon.” In Carruthers, Peter & Boucher, Jill (eds.), Language and Thought: Interdisciplinary Themes. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 184–200. Reprinted in Wilson & Sperber, 2012: 31–46.Google Scholar
*Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deirdre (2002). “Pragmatics, modularity and mind-reading.” Mind & Language 17(1&2): 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperlich, Wolfgang (2006) Noam Chomsky. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
Steedman, Mark (1993) “Categorial Grammar.” Lingua 90: 221–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steedman, Mark (2000) The Syntactic Process. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Steiner, George (1978) On Difficulty and Other Essays. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Strandskogen, Åse-Berit & Strandskogen, Rolf (1995) Norwegian: An Essential Grammar. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Strawson, Galen (2003) “Real materialism.” In Antony, & Hornstein, : 49–88.CrossRef
Stromswold, Karin (2001) “The heritability of language: A review and meta-analysis of twin, adoption and linkage studies.” Language 77: 647–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stromswold, Karin (2005) “Genetic specificity of linguistic heritability”. In Cutler, : 121–140.
Strozer, Judith (1994) Language Acquisition after Puberty. Washington, DC, Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Surian, Luca, Caldi, Stefania & Sperber, Dan (2007) “Attribution of beliefs by 13-month-old infants.” Psychological Science 18(7): 580–586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sutton-Spence, Rachel & Woll, Bencie (1999) An Introduction to the Linguistics of BSL. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter (2004) “On the Edge.” In Adger, , de Cat, & Tsoulas, : 261–287.CrossRef
Svenonius, Peter & Adger, David (2010) “Features in Minimalist syntax.” Lingbuzz/000825. Available at: http://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/000825.
Sykes, Christopher (ed.) (1994) No Ordinary Genius: The Illustrated Richard Feynman. London, Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Szabó, Zoltán Gendler (2005) “Chomsky, Noam Avram.” In Shook, John R. & Hull, Richard T. (eds.), The Dictionary of Modern American Philosophers. Bristol, Thoemmes Continuum. 478–486.Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna (2001) “The syntax of scope.” In Baltin, & Collins, : 607–633.CrossRef
Szaflarski, J. P., Binder, J. R., Possing, E. T., McKiernan, K. A., Ward, B. D. & Hammeke, T. A. (2002) “Language lateralization in left-handed and ambidextrous people: fMRI data.” Neurology 59(2): 238–244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tallerman, Maggie (2009) “If language is a jungle, why are we all cultivating the same plot?Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32(05): 469–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanenhaus, M. (1988) “Psycholinguistics: an overview.” In Newmeyer, F. (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, Vol. 3. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 1–37.Google Scholar
Tappe, H. (1999) Der Spracherwerb bei Corpus-Callosum-Agenesie: Eine explorative Studie. [Language acquisition in agenesis of the corpus callosum: An exploratory study.] Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney (2010) “Preface.” In Walgrave, Stefaan & Rucht, Dieter (eds.), The World Says No to War: Demonstrations Against the War On Iraq. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press. vii–xi.Google Scholar
Tattersall, Ian (2004) “What happened in the origin of human consciousness?The Anatomical Record B, The New Anatomist 276(1): 19–26.Google ScholarPubMed
Textor, Mark (2009) “Devitt on the epistemic authority of linguistic intuitions.” Erkenntnis 71(3): 395–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Michael S. C. & Karmiloff-Smith, Annette (2003) “Modelling language acquisition in atypical phenotypes.” Psychological Review 110(4): 647–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomason, R. (ed.) (1974) Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague. New Haven, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. (2000) “On the unpredictability of contact effects.” Sociolinguistic Studies 1(1): 173–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, D'Arcy W. (1942) On Growth and Form. 2 volumes. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, R. F. (1993) The Brain: A Neuroscience Primer. edition. New York, Freeman.Google Scholar
Thornton, R. (1991) Adventures in Long-distance Moving: The Acquisition of Complex Wh-Questions. PhD Thesis, University of Connecticut.
Tolman, Edward Chace & Honzik, Charles H. (1930) “Introduction and removal of reward, and maze performance in rats.” University of California Publications in Psychology 4: 257–275.Google Scholar
Tomalin, Marcus (2002) “The formal origins of syntactic theory.” Lingua 112: 827–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomalin, Marcus (2003) “Goodman, Quine, and Chomsky: from a grammatical point of view.” Lingua 113: 1223–1253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomalin, Marcus (2007) “Reconsidering recursion in syntactic theory.” Lingua 117: 1784–1800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael (2003) Constructing a Language. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tomaskovic-Devey, Don (2011) “Financialization and income inequality.” Sociological Images blog, November 10, 2011. http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2011/11/10/.
Tovar-Moll, Fernanda, Monteiro, Myriam, Andrade, Juliana, Bramati, Ivanei, Vianna-Barbosa, Rodrigo, Marins, Theo, Rodrigues, Erika, Dantas, Natalia, Behrens, Timothy, Oliveira-Souza, Ricardo de, Moll, Jorge & Lent, Roberto (2014) “Structural and functional brain rewiring clarifies preserved interhemispheric transfer in humans born without the corpus callosum.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (21): 7843–7848.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tovée, Martin (1996) An Introduction to the Visual System. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Townsend, D. & Bever, T. (2001) Sentence Comprehension: The Integration of Habits and Rules. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tsimpli, Ianthi-Maria (1991) “Functional categories and maturation: the prefunctional stage of language acquisition.” University College London Working Papers in Linguistics 3: 123–148.Google Scholar
Tsimpli, Ianthi-Maria (1996) The Prefunctional Stage of Language Acquisition. New York, Garland.Google Scholar
Tsimpli, Ianthi-Maria & Smith, Neil (1998) “Modules and Quasi-modules: Language and theory of mind in a polyglot savant.” Learning and Individual Differences 10: 193–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turgut, P. (2002) “Turkish judge in Chomsky case frees publisher.” The Independent, February 14, 2002, p. 15.
Turing, Alan (1952) “The chemical basis of morphogenesis.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: 37–72.CrossRef
Ullman, Shimon (1979) The Interpretation of Visual Motion. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ullman, Shimon (1996) High Level Vision. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Uriagereka, Juan (1998) Rhyme and Reason: An Introduction to Minimalist Syntax. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Uriagereka, Juan (2012) Spell-out and the Minimalist Program. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vallely, Paul (2003) “The invisible.” The Independent, June 26, 2003, Review, pp. 2–5.
Van de Koot, Hans (1991) “Parsing with principles: On constraining derivations.” University College London Working Papers in Linguistics 3: 369–395.Google Scholar
Van der Lely, Heather (1997a) “Language and cognitive development in a grammatical SLI boy: modularity and innateness.” Journal of Neurolinguistics 10: 75–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Lely, Heather (1997b) “SLI in children: movement, economy and deficits in the computational-syntactic system.” MS, Birkbeck College, University of London.
Van Fraassen, B. (1980) The Scientific Image. Oxford, Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander (2005) “Microparameters for Norwegian wh-grammars.” Linguistic Variation Yearbook 5(1): 187–226.Google Scholar
Vargha-Khadem, F., Carr, L., Isaacs, E., Brett, E., Adams, C. & Mishkin, M. (1997) “Onset of speech after left hemispherectomy in a nine-year-old boy.” Brain 120: 159–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vargha-Khadem, Faraneh & Liégeois, Frédérique (2007) “From speech to gene: The KE family and the FOXP2.” In Braten, S. (ed.), On Being Moved. Amsterdam, John Benjamins. 137–146.Google Scholar
Vargha-Khadem, F., Watkins, K., Alcock, K., Fletcher, P. & Passingham, R. (1995) “Praxic and nonverbal cognitive deficits in a large family with a genetically transmitted speech and language disorder.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 92: 930–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verkaik, Robert (2008) “Chomsky: Britain has failed US detainees.” The Independent, August 30, 2008.
Vidal-Hall, Judith (ed.) (2003) The A – Z of Free Expression. London, Index on Censorship.Google Scholar
Vissa, Preeti (2011) “How Goldman Sachs’ bet on Obama paid off.” The Huffington Post, August 31, 2011.
Vulliamy, Ed & Smith, Helena (2014) “Athens 1944: Britain's dirty secret.” The Observer, November 30, 2014.
Walker, Gabrielle (1997) “Here comes hypertime.” New Scientist 2106: 40–41.Google Scholar
Wallenberg, Joel (2013) “Scrambling, LF, and phrase structure change in Yiddish.” Lingua 133: 289–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waller, Bruce (1977) “Chomsky, Wittgenstein and the behaviourist perspective on language.” Behaviorism 5: 43–59. Reprinted in Otero, 1994, Vol. 2: 341–361.Google Scholar
Washington Post (2014) “The West must make Mr. Putin pay for his aggression.” The Washington Post, August 28, 2014.
Wason, Peter & Reich, Shuli (1979) “A verbal illusion.” The Quarterly Journal Of Experimental Psychology 31(Pt 4): 591–597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watts, Jonathan (2002) “Saburo Ienaga: One man's campaign against Japanese censorship.” The Guardian, December 3, 2002.
Webelhuth, Gert (1995a) Government and Binding Theory and the Minimalist Program. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Webelhuth, Gert (1995b) “X-bar theory and case theory.” In Webelhuth, , 1995a: 15–95.
Weinberg, Amy (1999) “A Minimalist theory of human sentence processing.” In Epstein, Samuel & Hornstein, Norbert (eds.), Working Minimalism. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press. 283–315.Google Scholar
Weiskrantz, Lawrence (1986) Blindsight: A Case Study and Implications. Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Wells, Rulon (1947) “Immediate constituents.” Language 23: 81–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Lydia (1981) “The responsibility of grammatical theory to acquisitional data.” In Hornstein, Norbert & Lightfoot, David (eds.), Explanations in Linguistics. London, Longman. 241–271.Google Scholar
Wiggins, David (1997) “Languages as social objects.” Philosophy 72(282): 499–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkin, Peter (1997) Noam Chomsky: On Power, Knowledge and Human Nature. London, Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Edwin (1995) “Theta theory.” In Webelhuth, , 1995a: 97–123.
Williamson, Timothy (2004) “Past the linguistic turn?” In Leiter, Brian (ed.), The Future for Philosophy. Oxford, Clarendon Press. 106–128.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre (2003) “New directions for research on pragmatics and modularity.” University College London Working Papers in Linguistics 15: 105–127.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre (2011) “The conceptual-procedural distinction: Past, present and future.” In Escandell-Vidal, Victoria, Leonetti, Manuel & Ahern, Aoife (eds.), Procedural Meaning: Problems and Perspectives. Bingley, Emerald.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre & Sperber, Dan (1981) “On Grice's theory of conversation.” In Werth, Paul (ed.), Conversation and Discourse. London, Croom Helm. 155–178.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre & Sperber, Dan (2002) “Truthfulness and relevance.” Mind 111(443): 583–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre & Sperber, Dan (2004) “Relevance theory.” In Horn, Laurence R. & Ward, Gregory L. (eds.), The Handbook of Pragmatics. Malden, MA, Blackwell. 607–632.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre & Sperber, Dan (2012) Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Winston, Morton (2002) On Chomsky. Wadsworth Philosophers Series. Belmont, CA, Wadsworth/Thomson Learning, Inc.Google Scholar
Wolpert, Lewis (1991) The Triumph of the Embryo. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wonnacott, Elizabeth (2011) “Balancing generalization and lexical conservatism: An artificial language study with child learners.” Journal of Memory and Language 65: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worthington, Andy (2009) “When torture kills: Ten murders in US prisons in Afghanistan.” Andy Worthington's website, July 1, 2009. www.andyworthington.co.uk/2009/07/01/when-torture-kills-ten-murders-in-us-prisons-in-afghanistan/.
Xu, Fei & Garcia, Vashti (2008) “Intuitive statistics by 8-month-old infants.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105: 5012–5015.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, Fei & Kushnir, Tamar (2013) “Infants are rational constructivist learners.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 22: 28–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Charles (2006) The Infinite Gift: How Children Learn and Unlearn the Languages of the World. New York, Scribner.Google Scholar
Yang, Charles (2012) “Computational models of syntactic acquisition.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 3(2): 205–213.Google ScholarPubMed
Zeldin, Theodore (1973) France 1848–1945. 2 volumes. Oxford, Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, David (1969) “Is linguistic rationalism a rational linguistics?” In Hook, : 198–207.
*Zinn, Howard (1996) A People's History of The United States: From 1492 to the Present. London, Longman.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Neil Smith, University College London, Nicholas Allott, Universitetet i Oslo
  • Book: Chomsky
  • Online publication: 18 December 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139979634.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Neil Smith, University College London, Nicholas Allott, Universitetet i Oslo
  • Book: Chomsky
  • Online publication: 18 December 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139979634.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Neil Smith, University College London, Nicholas Allott, Universitetet i Oslo
  • Book: Chomsky
  • Online publication: 18 December 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139979634.012
Available formats
×