Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T11:44:54.592Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 15 - Cervical Cancer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2024

Laurie J. Mckenzie
Affiliation:
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
Denise R. Nebgen
Affiliation:
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
Get access

Summary

Cervical cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy worldwide and the third most common in the United States. While incidence and mortality rates have decreased significantly with improved access to screening and prevention methods in the United States, cervical cancer remains a significant cause of cancer morbidity and mortality in resource-limited countries. Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is the cause of almost all cervical cancer and is associated with 99.7% of cervical cancer. Additional risk factors associated with HPV include early onset of sexual activity, multiple sexual partners, history of sexually transmitted infections, increased parity, and immunosuppression. Non-HPV-related risk factors include cigarette smoking, oral contraceptive use, and low socioeconomic status. Squamous cell carcinoma is the most common histologic subtype of cervical cancer, comprising around 70% of cases, and adenocarcinoma is the second most common histologic subtype, comprising approximately 25% of cases. Cervical cancer is staged clinically, and stage is the most important prognostic factor. Early-stage disease can generally be treated surgically with a hysterectomy. Fertility-sparing surgical options include cold knife conization and radical trachelectomy in select cases. Adjuvant therapy with chemotherapy, radiation, or chemoradiation may be required for early-stage disease with specific risk factors. Advanced-stage disease is primarily treated with chemoradiation. Using FIGO 2018 staging, five-year survival rates were 92−97% for stage IA tumors and 76−92% for stage IB tumors. Lymph node involvement is associated with worse prognosis with five-year survival rates near 40−60%. Routine screening with cervical cytology is recommended starting in young adulthood to identify and treat females with high-grade dysplasia. Routine HPV vaccination is recommended to protect against development of cervical cancer from persistent high-risk HPV infection.

Type
Chapter
Information
Caring for the Female Cancer Patient
Gynecologic Considerations
, pp. 258 - 270
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Sung, H., Ferlay, J, Siegel, R. L., et al., Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancer in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Torre, L. A., Bray, F., Siegel, R. L., et al., Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(2):87108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Siegel, R. L., Miller, K. D., Wagle, N. S., et al., Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin, 2023;73(1):1748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howlader, N., Noone, A., Krapcho, M., et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2016. 2019; https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2016/ based on November 2018 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, April 2019.Google Scholar
Surveillance, E., and Program, End Results, Cancer stat facts: Cervical cancer. 2022.Google Scholar
Yan, D. D., Tang, Q., Chen, J. H., et al., Prognostic value of the 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer patients with surgical risk factors. Cancer Manag Res. 2019;11:5473–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kubota, S., Kobayashi, E., Kakuda, M., et al., Retrospective analysis for predictors of parametrial involvement in IB cervical cancer. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019;45(3):679–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melamed, A., Margul, D. J., Chen, L., et al., Survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(20):1905–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhatla, N., Aoki, D., Sharma, D. N., et al., Cancer of the cervix uteri. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018;143 Suppl 2:2236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhatla, N., Berek, J. S., Cuello, Fredes M., et al., Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019;145(1):129–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, J. D., Matsuo, K., Huang, Y., et al., Prognostic performance of the 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Cervical Cancer Staging Guidelines. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;134(1):4957.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walboomers, J. M., Jacobs, M. V., Manos, M. M., et al., Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. J Pathol. 1999;189(1):1219.3.0.CO;2-F>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schiffman, M., Castle, P. E., Jeronimo, J., et al., Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. Lancet. 2007;370(9590):890907.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
International Collaboration of Epidemiological Studies of Cervical Cancer, Comparison of risk factors for invasive squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the cervix: collaborative reanalysis of individual data on 8,097 women with squamous cell carcinoma and 1,374 women with adenocarcinoma from 12 epidemiological studies. Int J Cancer. 2007;120(4):885–91.Google Scholar
International Collaboration of Epidemiological Studies of Cervical Cancer, et al., Carcinoma of the cervix and tobacco smoking: collaborative reanalysis of individual data on 13,541 women with carcinoma of the cervix and 23,017 women without carcinoma of the cervix from 23 epidemiological studies. Int J Cancer. 2006;118(6):1481–95.Google Scholar
International Collaboration of Epidemiological Studies of Cervical Cancer, et al., Cervical cancer and hormonal contraceptives: collaborative reanalysis of individual data for 16,573 women with cervical cancer and 35,509 women without cervical cancer from 24 epidemiological studies. Lancet. 2007;370(9599):1609–21.Google Scholar
Singh, G. K., Miller, B. A., Hankey, B. F., et al., Persistent area socioeconomic disparities in U.S. incidence of cervical cancer, mortality, stage, and survival, 1975–2000. Cancer. 2004;101(5):1051–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hemminki, K., Chen, B. Familial risks for cervical tumors in full and half siblings: etiologic apportioning. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15(7):1413–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Syngal, S., Brand, R. E., Church, J. M., et al., ACG clinical guideline: Genetic testing and management of hereditary gastrointestinal cancer syndromes. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110(2):223–62; quiz 263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Craveiro, R., Bravo, I., Catarino, R., et al., The role of p73 G4C14-to-A4T14 polymorphism in the susceptibility to cervical cancer. DNA Cell Biol. 2012;31(2):224–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, L., Yang, X., Chen, X., et al., Association between TNF-alpha polymorphisms and cervical cancer risk: A meta-analysis. Mol Biol Rep. 2012;39(3):2683–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adegoke, O., Kulasingam, S., Virnig, B., Cervical cancer trends in the United States: a 35-year population-based analysis. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2012;21(10):1031–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, H. O., Tiffany, M. F., Qualls, C. R., et al., The rising incidence of adenocarcinoma relative to squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix in the United States: A 24-year population-based study. Gynecol Oncol. 2000;78(2):97105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vinh-Hung, V., Bourgain, C., Vlastos, G., et al., Prognostic value of histopathology and trends in cervical cancer: a SEER population study. BMC Cancer. 2007;7:164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sevin, B. U., Lu, Y., Bloch, D. A., et al., Surgically defined prognostic parameters in patients with early cervical carcinoma. A multivariate survival tree analysis. Cancer. 1996;78(7):1438–46.3.0.CO;2-0>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colombo, N., Dubot, C., Lorusso, D., et al., Pembrolizumab for persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(20):1856–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hauspy, J., Beiner, M., Harley, I., et al., Sentinel lymph nodes in early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;105(2):285–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noel, P., Dube, M., Plante, M., et al., Early cervical carcinoma and fertility-sparing treatment options: MR imaging as a tool in patient selection and a follow-up modality. Radiographics. 2014;34(4):1099–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arbyn, M., Xu, L., Simoens, C., et al., Prophylactic vaccination against human papillomaviruses to prevent cervical cancer and its precursors. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;5(5):CD009069.Google ScholarPubMed
Fontham, E. T. H., Wolf, A. M. D., Church, T. R., et al., Cervical cancer screening for individuals at average risk: 2020 guideline update from the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(5):321–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, J. J., Burger, E. A., Regan, C., et al., Screening for cervical cancer in primary care: A decision analysis for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2018;320(7):706–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saslow, D., Solomon, D., Lawson, H. W., et al., American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62(3):147–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Partridge, E. E., Abu-Rustum, N. R., Campos, S. M., et al., Cervical cancer screening. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2010;8(12):1358–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pecorelli, S., Zigliani, L., Odicino, F. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;105(2):107–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Benedet, J. L., Bender, H., Jones, H., et al., FIGO staging classifications and clinical practice guidelines in the management of gynecologic cancer. FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2000;70(2):209–62.Google ScholarPubMed
Network, N.C.C. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Cervical cancer. . 2023 3/10/2023]; www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/cervical.pdf.Google Scholar
Shimada, M., Kigawa, J., Nishimura, R., et al., Ovarian metastasis in carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;101(2):234–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salvo, G., Ramirez, P. T., Leitao, M. M., et al., Open vs minimally invasive radical trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: International Radical Trachelectomy Assessment Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;226(1):e1–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koh, W. J., Abu-Rustum, N. R., Bean, S., et al., Cervical Cancer, Version 3.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019;17(1):6484.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rotman, M., Sedlis, A., Piedmonte, M. R., et al., A phase III randomized trial of postoperative pelvic irradiation in Stage IB cervical carcinoma with poor prognostic features: Follow-up of a gynecologic oncology group study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;65(1):169–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sedlis, A., Bundy, B. N., Rotman, M. Z. et al., A randomized trial of pelvic radiation therapy versus no further therapy in selected patients with stage IB carcinoma of the cervix after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecol Oncol. 1999;73(2):177–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monk, B. J., Wang, J., Im, S., et al., Rethinking the use of radiation and chemotherapy after radical hysterectomy: A clinical-pathologic analysis of a Gynecologic Oncology Group/Southwest Oncology Group/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trial. Gynecol Oncol. 2005;96(3):721–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peters, W. A., 3rd, Liu, P. Y., Barrett, R. J., 2nd, et al., Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage cancer of the cervix. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(8):1606–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical Cancer Meta-analysis, Reducing uncertainties about the effects of chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: Individual patient data meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;2010(1):CD008285.Google Scholar
Tewari, K. S., Sill, M. W., Long, H. J., 3rd, et al., Improved survival with bevacizumab in advanced cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(8):734–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elit, L., Fyles, A. W., Devries, M. C., et al., Follow-up for women after treatment for cervical cancer: A systematic review. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;114(3):528–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shepherd, J. H., Uterus-conserving surgery for invasive cervical cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;19(4):577–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ploch, E., Hormonal replacement therapy in patients after cervical cancer treatment. Gynecol Oncol. 1987;26(2):169–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, P., Oehler, M. K., Hormone replacement after gynaecological cancer. Maturitas. 2010;65(3):190–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, T. G., Radiosensitivity of mammalian oocytes with particular reference to the human female. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1971;110(5):746–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeney, D. D., Moore, D. H., Look, K. Y. et al., The fate of the ovaries after radical hysterectomy and ovarian transposition. Gynecol Oncol. 1995;56(1):37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stuenkel, C. A., Davis, S. R., Gompel, A., et al., Treatment of symptoms of the menopause: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(11):39754011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salani, R., Backes, F. J., Fung, M. F., et al., Posttreatment surveillance and diagnosis of recurrence in women with gynecologic malignancies: Society of Gynecologic Oncologists recommendations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204(6):466–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Markowitz, L. E., Dunne, E. F., Saraiya, M., et al., Human papillomavirus vaccination: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep. 2014;63(RR-05):130.Google ScholarPubMed
Liao, C. I., Francoeur, A. A., Kapp, D. S., et al., Trends in human papillomavirus-associated cancer, demographic characteristics, and vaccinations in the US, 2001–2017. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(3):e222530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brooks, R. A., Wright, J. D., Powell, M. A., et al., Long-term assessment of bladder and bowel dysfunction after radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;114(1):75–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferrandina, G., Mantegna, G., Petrillo, M., et al., Quality of life and emotional distress in early stage and locally advanced cervical cancer patients: A prospective, longitudinal study. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;124(3):389–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pieterse, Q. D., Maas, C. P., ter Kuile, M. M., et al., An observational longitudinal study to evaluate miction, defecation, and sexual function after radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006;16(3):1119–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frumovitz, M., Sun, C. C., Schover, L. R., et al., Quality of life and sexual functioning in cervical cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(30):7428–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Denton, A. S., Clarke, N. W., Maher, E. J., Non-surgical interventions for late radiation cystitis in patients who have received radical radiotherapy to the pelvis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;2002(3):CD001773.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parkin, D. E., Davis, J. A., Symonds, R. P., Long-term bladder symptomatology following radiotherapy for cervical carcinoma. Radiother Oncol. 1987;9(3):195–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parkin, D. E., Davis, J. A., Symonds, R. P., Urodynamic findings following radiotherapy for cervical carcinoma. Br J Urol. 1988;61(3):213–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bjelic-Radisic, V., Jensen, P. T., Vlasic, K. K. et al., Quality of life characteristics inpatients with cervical cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48(16):3009–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klee, M., Thranov, I., Machin, D., Life after radiotherapy: The psychological and social effects experienced by women treated for advanced stages of cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2000;76(1):513.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Velji, K., Fitch, M., The experience of women receiving brachytherapy for gynecologic cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2001;28(4):743–51.Google ScholarPubMed
Yeoh, E., Sun, W. M., Russo, A., et al., A retrospective study of the effects of pelvic irradiation for gynecological cancer on anorectal function. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996;35(5):1003–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmeler, K. M., Jhingran, A., Iyer, R. B., et al. Pelvic fractures after radiotherapy for cervical cancer: implications for survivors. Cancer. 2010;116:625–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suvaal, I., Kirchheiner, K., Nout, R. A., et al. Vaginal changes, sexual functioning and distress of women with locally advanced cervical cancer treated in the EMBRACE vaginal morbidity substudy. Gyn Onc. 2023;170;123–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chin, C., Damast, S . Brachytherapy inpacts on sexual function: An integrative review of literature focusing on cervical cancer. Brachytherapy. 2023;22:3046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, P. T., Klee, M. C., Thranov, I., Groenvld, M. Psychooncology. 2004;8:577–92.Google Scholar
Bergmark, K., Avall-Lundqvist, E., Dickman, P. W., et al. Vaginal changes and sexuality in women with a history of cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999;18:1383–9.Google Scholar
Hartman, P., Diddle, A. W. Vaginal stenosis following irradiation therapy for carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Cancer. 1972;30:426–42.3.0.CO;2-M>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Damast, S., Jeffery, D. D., Son, C. H., et al. Literature review of vaginal stenosis and dilator use in radiation. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2019;9:479–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chin, C., Damast, S. Brachytherapy impacts on sexual function: An integrative review of the literature focusing on cervical cancer. Brachytherapy. 2022;17:27.Google Scholar
Carter, J., Baser, R. E., Goldfrank, D. J., et al. A single-arm, prospective trial investigating the effectiveness of a non-hormonal vaginal moisturizer containing hyaluronic acid in postmenopausal cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer. 2021;29:311–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vistad, I., Cvancarova, M., Kristensen, G. B., Fossa, S. D. A study of chronic pelvic pain after radiotherapy in survivors of locally advanced cervical cancer. J Cancer Surviv. 2011;5:208–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alappattu, M. J. Pain and psychological outcomes after rehabilitative treatment for a woman with chronic pelvic pain with stage III cervical cancer: A case report. J Womens Health Hys Therap. 2013;37:97102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lowenstein, L., Gruenwald, I., Gartman, I., et al. Can stronger pelvic muscle floor improve sexual function? Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21:553–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×