Book contents
- Can America Govern Itself?
- SSRC Anxieties of Democracy
- Sponsored by the Social Science Research Council
- Can America Govern Itself?
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- 1 The Anxieties of American Democracy
- Part I Anxieties of Power, Influence, and Representation
- Part II Procedural Anxieties
- Part III Anxieties of Governance
- 10 Public Policy and Political Dysfunction
- 11 The Effects of Partisan Polarization on the Bureaucracy
- 12 Polarization and the Changing American Constitutional System
- 13 Democratic Anxieties
- Index
- Index Authors
- References
13 - Democratic Anxieties
Present and Emergent
from Part III - Anxieties of Governance
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 May 2019
Book contents
- Can America Govern Itself?
- SSRC Anxieties of Democracy
- Sponsored by the Social Science Research Council
- Can America Govern Itself?
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- 1 The Anxieties of American Democracy
- Part I Anxieties of Power, Influence, and Representation
- Part II Procedural Anxieties
- Part III Anxieties of Governance
- 10 Public Policy and Political Dysfunction
- 11 The Effects of Partisan Polarization on the Bureaucracy
- 12 Polarization and the Changing American Constitutional System
- 13 Democratic Anxieties
- Index
- Index Authors
- References
Summary
This volume grows out of the well-documented psychological impulse to bring information to bear on sources of anxiety. In politics, as in other realms of life, anxiety triggers a quest for information. Perceived threats focus the attention (Marcus, Neuman, and MacKuen, 2000). Anxious citizens take more interest in politics, have more motivation to learn, and weigh the information they collect more judiciously (Marcus and MacKuen, 1993, MacKuen et al, 2010, Albertson and Gadarian, 2015). In these respects, worried citizens are better citizens (Brader, 2005, Valentino et al, 2008).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Can America Govern Itself? , pp. 238 - 344Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Albertson, Bethany, and Gadarian, Shana Kushner. 2015. Anxious Politics: Democratic Citizenship in a Threatening World. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 2016. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. 2nd edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank, Berry, Jeffrey M., Hojnacki, Marie, Kimball, David C., and Leech, Beth L.. 2009. Lobbying and Policy Change. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brader, Ted. 2005. “Striking a Responsive Chord: How Political Ads Motivate and Persuade Voters by Appealing to Emotions.” American Journal of Political Science 49(2): 388–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulman-Pozen, Jessica, and Gerken, Heather K.. 2009. “Uncooperative Federalism.” Yale Law Journal (118): 1256–1583.Google Scholar
Cohen, Marty, Karol, David, Noel, Hans, and Zaller, John. 2008. The Party Decides. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Marty, Karol, David, Noel, Hans, and Zaller, John. 2016. “Party versus Faction in the Reformed Presidential Nominating System,” P.S.: Political Science and Politics 49: 701–708.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 2001. How Democratic Is the American Constitution? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry. 2015.“Facing Up to the Democratic Recession,” Journal of Democracy 26: 141–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, George C. 2018. “‘Closer’ or Context? Explaining Donald Trump’s Relations with Congress.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 48: 456–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilens, Martin. 2012. Affluence & Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gilens, Martin, and Page, Benjamin I.. 2014. “Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens,” Perspectives on Politics 12(3): 564–581.Google Scholar
Kazin, Michael, 1995. The Populist Persuasion: An American History. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kriner, Douglas L., and Schickler, Eric. 2016. Investigating the President: Congressional Checks on Presidential Power. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kriner, Douglas, and Schickler, Eric. 2018. “The Resilience of Separation of Powers? Congress and the Russia Investigation.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 48(3): 436–455.Google Scholar
Lee, Frances E. 2018. “The 115th Congress and Questions of Party Unity in a Polarized Era,” Journal of Politics 80(4): 1464–1473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Ziblatt, Daniel. 2018. How Democracies Die. New York: Crown Publishing.Google Scholar
MacKuen, Michael, Wolak, Jennifer, Keele, Luke, and Marcus, George. 2010. “Civic Engagements: Resolute Partisanship or Reflective Deliberation.” American Journal of Political Science 54(2): 440–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, George E., and MacKuen, Michael. 1993. “Anxiety, Enthusiasm, and the Vote: The Emotional Underpinnings of Learning and Involvement during Presidential Campaigns,” American Political Science Review 87(3): 672–685.Google Scholar
Marcus, George E., Neuman, W. Russell, and MacKuen, Michael. 2000. Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 2005. Divided We Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking and Investigations, 1946–2002, 2nd ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mickey, Robert, Levitsky, Steven, and Way, Lucan Ahmad. 2017. “Is America Still Safe for Democracy? Why the United States Is in Danger of Backsliding,” Foreign Affairs 96(May/June): 20–29.Google Scholar
Miler, Kristina C. 2018. Poor Representation: Congress and the Politics of Poverty in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mounk, Yascha. 2018. The People vs. Democracy: Why Our Freedom Is in Danger and How to Save It. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mudde, Cas. 2004. “The Populist Zeitgeist,” Government and Opposition 39(4): 541–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Jan-Werne. 2016. What Is Populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Pearson, Kathryn. 2017. “President Trump and Congressional Republicans: Uncertain Teamwork in the 115th Congress.” The Forum 15(3): 513–524.Google Scholar
Reich, Gary. 2018. “Hitting a Wall? The Trump Administration Meets Immigration Federalism.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 48(3): 372–395.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. 1960. The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Snyder, Timothy. 2018. The Road to Unfreedom: Russia, Europe, America. New York: Tim Duggan Books.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R., ed. 2018. Can It Happen Here? Authoritarianism in America. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Valentino, Nicholas A., Hutchings, Vincent L., Banks, Antoine J., and Davis, Anne I.. 2008. “Is a Worried Citizen a Good Citizen? Emotions, Political Information Seeking, and Learning Via the Internet.” Political Psychology 29(2): 247–273.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 2013. “The Threat from the Populist Left,” Journal of Democracy 24: 18–32.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt, and Madrid, Raúl L.. 2019. Trump’s Populism: The Mobilization of Nationalist Cleavages and the Future of U.S. Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar