Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T15:20:36.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - The Role of Abilities in Learning and Training Performance

from Part II - Understanding the Learner

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2017

Kenneth G. Brown
Affiliation:
University of Iowa
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acemoglu, D., and Pischke, J. 1999. Beyond Becker: Training in imperfect labour markets. The Economic Journal 109(453): F112F142.Google Scholar
Ackerman, P. L. 1988. Determinants of individual differences during skill acquisition: Cognitive abilities and information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 117: 288318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackerman, P. L. 1996. A theory of adult intellectual development: Process, personality, interests, and knowledge. Intelligence 22: 227257.Google Scholar
Ackerman, P. L., and Beier, M. E. 2003. Trait complexes, cognitive investment, and domain knowledge. In Robert Sternberg and Elena Grigorenko, eds., The Psychology of Abilities, Competencies, and Expertise, 1–30. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ackerman, P. L., and Beier, M. E. 2004. Knowledge and intelligence. In Oliver Wilhelm, ed., Handbook of Understanding and Measuring Intelligence, 125–139. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Ackerman, P. L., and Beier, M. E. 2006. Determinants of domain knowledge and independent study learning in an adult sample. Journal of Educational Psychology 98: 366381.Google Scholar
Ackerman, P. L., Beier, M. E., and Boyle, M O. 2005. Working memory and intelligence: The same or different constructs? Psychological Bulletin 131: 3060.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. R. 1982. Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review 89: 369406.Google Scholar
Arrow, H., McGrath, J. E. and Berdahl, J. L. 2000. Small Groups as Complex Systems: Formation, Coordination, Development, and Adaption. Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arthur, W. Jr., Villado, A. J., and Bennett, W. Jr. 2012. Innovations in team task analysis: Identifying task elements, tasks, and jobs that are team-based. In Alliger, G., Bennett, W. Jr., Gibson, S., and Wilson, M., eds., The Handbook of Work Analysis in Organizations: The Methods, Systems, Applications, and Science of Work Measurement and Organizations, 641–661. New York: Routledge/Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Barnett, S. M., and Ceci, S. J. 2002. When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin 128: 612637.Google Scholar
Beier, M. E., and Ackerman, P. L. 2001. Current-events knowledge in adults: An investigation of age, intelligence, and nonability determinants. Psychology and Aging 16: 615628.Google Scholar
Beier, M. E., and Ackerman, P. L. 2003. Determinants of health knowledge: An investigation of age, gender, abilities, personality, and interests. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84: 439448.Google Scholar
Beier, M. E., and Ackerman, P. L. 2005. Age, ability, and the role of prior knowledge on the acquisition of new domain knowledge: Promising results in a real-world learning environment. Psychology and Aging 20: 341355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beier, M. E., and Oswald, F. L. 2012. Is cognitive ability a liability? A critique and future research agenda on skilled performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 18: 331345.Google Scholar
Beier, M. E., Rixner, S., and Warren, J. 2016. Predicting performance and attrition in a Massive Open Online Course. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
Beilock, S. L., Bertenthal, B. I., Hoerger, M. M., and Carr, T. H. 2008. When does haste make waste? Speed-accuracy tradeoff, skill level, and the tools of the trade. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 14: 340352.Google Scholar
Bell, S. T. 2007. Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 92: 595615.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bertua, C., Anderson, N. and Salgado, J. F. 2005. The predictive validity of cognitive ability tests: A UK meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 78: 387409.Google Scholar
Brown, K. G., Le, H., and Schmidt, F. L. 2006. Specific aptitude theory revisited: Is there incremental validity for training performance? International Journal of Selection and Assessment 14: 87100.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. P., and Kuncel, N. R. 2001. Individual and team training. In D. H. Ones, N. Anderson, C. Viswesvaran, and H. K. Sinangil, eds., Handbook of Industrial, Work and Organizational Psychology, 278–312. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B. 1993. Human Cognitive Abilities: A Survey of Factor-Analytic Studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carter, M. and Beier, M. E. 2010. The effectiveness of error management training with working-aged adults. Personnel Psychology 63: 641675.Google Scholar
Cascio, W. F. 2014. Leveraging employer branding, performance management and human resource development to enhance employee retention. Human Resource Development International 17: 121128.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. 1987. Intelligence: Its Structure, Growth, and Action. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. 1957. The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist 12: 671684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crook, A. E., and Beier, M. E. 2010. When training with a partner is inferior to training alone: The importance of dyad type and interaction quality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 16: 335348.Google Scholar
Day, E. A., Arthur, W. Jr., Miyashiro, B., Edwards, B. D., Tubré, T. C., and Tubré, A. H. 2004. Criterion-related validity of statistical operationalizations of group general cognitive ability as a function of task type: Comparing the mean, maximum, and minimum. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 34: 15211549.Google Scholar
Day, E. A., Arthur, W. Jr., Bell, S. T., Edwards, B. D., Bennett, W. Jr., Mendoza, J. L., and Tubré, T. C. 2005. Ability-based pairing strategies in the team-based training of a complex skill: Does the cognitive ability of your training partner matter? Intelligence 33: 3965.Google Scholar
Engle, R. W., and Kane, M. J. 2004. Executive attention, working memory capacity, and a two-factor theory of cognitive control. In B. Ross, ed., The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 145–199. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Glickman, Albert S., Zimmer, Seth R., Montero, Craig, Guerette, Paula J., Campbell, Wanda J., Morgan, Ben B. Jr., and Salas, Eduardo. 1987. The Evolution of Team Skills: An Empirical Assessment with Implications for Training. Tech Report Number 87-016. Arlington: Office of Naval Research.Google Scholar
Guilford, J. P. 1967. The Nature of Human Intelligence. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Gully, S. M., and Chen, Gilad. 2010. Individual Differences, Attribute-Treatment Interactions, and Training Outcomes. In S. W. J. Kozlowski and E. Salas, eds., Learning, Training, and Development in Organizations, 3–64. New York: Taylor Francis.Google Scholar
Gully, S. M., Payne, Stephanie C., Koles, Lee Kiechel K., and Whiteman, Jon-Andrew K.. 2002. The impact of error training and individual differences on training outcomes: An attribute-treatment interaction perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology 87: 143155.Google Scholar
Hertzog, C., Kramer, Arthur F., Wilson, Robert S., and Lindenberger, Ulman. 2008. Enrichment effects on adult cognitive development: Can the functional capacity of older adults be preserved and enhanced? Psychological Science in the Public Interest 9: 165.Google Scholar
Horn, J. L., and Cattell, Raymond B.. 1966. Refinement and test of the theory of fluid and crystallized general intelligences. Journal of Educational Psychology 57: 253270.Google Scholar
Hunter, J. E. 1986. Cognitive ability, cognitive aptitude, job knowledge, and job performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior 29: 340362.Google Scholar
Hunter, J. E., and Hunter, Ronda F.. 1984. Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. Psychological Bulletin 96: 7298.Google Scholar
Jha, A. P., Stanley, Elizabeth A., Kiyonaga, Anastasia, Wong, Ling, and Gelfand, Lois. 2010. Examining the protective effects of mindfulness training on working memory capacity and affective experience. Emotion 10: 5464.Google Scholar
Johnson, W., and Bouchard, Thomas J., Jr. 2005. The structure of human intelligence: It is verbal, perceptual, and image rotation (VPR), not fluid and crystallized. Intelligence 33: 393416.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. 1973. Attention and Effort. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Kane, M. J., Conway, Andrew R. A., Hambrick, David Z., and Engle, Randall W.. 2007. Variation in working memory capacity as variation in executive attention and control. In A. R. A. Conway, C. Jarrold, M. J. Kane, A. Miyake, and J. N. Towse, eds., Variation in Working Memory, 21–48. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kane, M. J., and Engle, Randall W.. 2002. The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: An individual-differences perspective. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9: 637671.Google Scholar
Kanfer, R., and Ackerman, P. L. 1989. Motivation and cognitive abilities: An integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition. Journal of Applied Psychology 74: 657690.Google Scholar
Kanfer, R., and Ackerman, P. L. 1996. A self-regulatory skills perspective to reducing cognitive interference. In I. G. Sarason, G. R. Pierce, and B. R. Sarason, eds., Cognitive Interference: Theories, Methods, and Findings. The LEA Series in Personality and Clinical Psychology, 153–171. Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.Google Scholar
Kraiger, K., Ford, J. K., and Salas, E. 1993. Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology 78: 311328.Google Scholar
Kuhl, J. 1984. Volitional aspects of achievement motivation and learned helplessness: Toward a comprehensive theory of action control. In B. A. Maher, ed., Progress in Experimental Personality Research, 13: 99–171. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lubinski, D. 2000. Scientific and social significance of assessing individual differences: Sinking shafts at a few critical points. Annual Review of Psychology 51: 405444.Google Scholar
Luchins, A. S. 1942. Mechanization in problem solving: The effect of Einstellung. Psychological Monographs 54: i95.Google Scholar
McGrew, K. S. 2005. The Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory of cognitive abilities: Past, present, and future. In Flanagan, Dawn P., and Patti L. Harrison, eds. Contemporary Intellectual Assessment: Theories, Tests, and Issues, 136–181. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, B. B. Jr., Glickman, Albert S., Woodward, Elizabeth A., Blaives, Arthur S., and Salas, Eduardo. 1986. Measurement of team behaviors in a navy environment. Tech Report Number 86-014. Orlando: Naval Training Systems Center.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Motowidlo, S. J., and Beier, Margaret E.. 2010. Differentiating specific job knowledge from implicit trait policies in procedural knowledge measured by a situational judgment test. Journal of Applied Psychology 95: 321333.Google Scholar
Mount, M. K., Oh, In-Sue and Burns, Melanie. 2008. Incremental validity of perceptual speed and accuracy over general mental ability. Personnel Psychology 61: 113139.Google Scholar
Mrazek, M. D., Franklin, Michael S., Phillips, Dawa T., Baird, Benjamin, and Schooler, Jonathan W.. 2013. Mindfulness training improves working memory capacity and GRE performance while reducing mind wandering. Psychological Science 24: 776781.Google Scholar
Norman, D. A., and Bobrow, Daniel B.. 1975. On data-limited and resource-limited processes. Cognitive Psychology 7: 4464.Google Scholar
Rabipour, S., and Raz, A. 2012. Training the brain: Fact and fad in cognitive and behavioral remediation. Brain and Cognition 79: 159179.Google Scholar
Randall, J. G. 2015. Mind wandering and self-directed learning: Testing the efficacy of self-regulation interventions to reduce mind wandering and enhance online training performance. PhD diss., Rice University, Houston, TX.Google Scholar
Randall, J. G., Oswald, Frederick L., and Beier, Margaret E.. 2014. Mind-wandering, cognition, and performance: A theory driven meta-analysis of attention regulation. Psychological Bulletin 140: 14111431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ree, M. J., and Earles, James A.. 1991. Predicting training success: Not much more than g. Personnel Psychology 44: 321332.Google Scholar
Ree, M. J., Earles, James A., and Teachout, Mark S.. 1994. Predicting job performance: not much more than g. Journal of Applied Psychology 79: 518524.Google Scholar
Reeve, C. L., Scherbaum, Charles, and Goldstein, Harold W.. 2015. Manifestations of intelligence: expanding the measurement space to reconsider specific cognitive abilities. Human Resource Management Review 25: 2837.Google Scholar
Roberts, R. D., Goff, Ginger N., Anjoul, Fadi, Kyllonen, P.C.., Pallier, Gerry, and Stankov, Lazar. 2000. The armed services vocational aptitude battery (ASVAB): Little more than acculturated (Gc)!? Learning and Individual Differences 12(1): 81103.Google Scholar
Ryan, A. M., and Ployhart, R. E. 2014. A century of selection. Annual Review of Psychology 65: 693717.Google Scholar
Salthouse, T. A. 2010. Major Issues in Cognitive Aging. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, F. L., and Hunter, J. E. 1998. The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin 124: 262274.Google Scholar
Schneider, W. J., Dumais, , and , S. T., Shiffrin, Richard M.. 1984. Automatic and Control Processing and Attention. In R. Parasuraman and D. R. Davies, eds., Varieties of Attention, 1–27. Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, W. J., and McGrew, K. S. 2012. The Cattell-Horn-Carroll model of intelligence. In D. P. Flanagan and P. L. Harrison, eds., Contemporary Intellectual Assessment: Theories, Tests, and Issues, 3rd ed., 99–144. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, W. J., and Newman, D. A. 2015. Intelligence is multidimensional: Theoretical review and implications of specific cognitive abilities. Human Resource Management Review 25: 1227.Google Scholar
Shadish, W. R., Cook, Thomas D., and Campbell, Donald T.. 2001. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference, 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Shipstead, Z., Redick, Thomas S. and Engle, Randall W.. 2012. Is working memory training effective? Psychological Bulletin 138: 628654.Google Scholar
Sitzmann, T., and Ely, K. 2011. A meta-analysis of self-regulated learning in work-related training and educational attainment: What we know and where we need to go. Psychological Bulletin 137: 441442.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sitzmann, T., Brown, Kenneth G., Casper, Wendy J., Ely, Katherine, and Zimmerman, Ryan D.. 2008. A review and meta-analysis of the nomological network of trainee reactions. Journal of Applied Psychology 93: 280295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, E. M., Ford, J. K., and Kozlowski, S. W. J. 1997. Building adaptive expertise: Implications for training design strategies. In M. A. Quiñones and A. Ehrenstein, eds., Training for a Rapidly Changing Workplace: Applications of Psychological Research, 89–118. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Snow, R. E. 1989. Aptitude-treatment interaction as a framework for research on individual differences in learning. In Phillip L. Ackerman, Robert J. Sternberg, and Robert Glaser, eds., Learning and Individual Differences: Advances in Theory and Research. A Series of Books in Psychology, 13–59. New York: Freeman/Times Books.Google Scholar
Spearman, C. 1904. General intelligence objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology 15: 201293.Google Scholar
Stevens, M. J., and Campion, M. A. 1994. The knowledge, skill and ability requirements for teamwork: Implications for human resource management. Journal of Management 25: 207228.Google Scholar
Stevens, M. J., and Campion, M. A. 1999. Staffing work teams: Development and validation of a selection test for teamwork settings. Journal of Management 25: 207228.Google Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. 1938. Primary Mental Abilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Toossi, M. 2013. Labor force projections to 2022: The labor force participation rate continues to fall. Monthly Labor Review. http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2013/article/labor-force-projections-to-2022-the-labor-force-participation-rate-continues-to-fall.htm (accessed March 2, 2015).Google Scholar
Vernon, P. E. 1971. The Structure of Human Abilities, 2nd ed. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Wickens, C. D. 1984. Processing resources in attention. In P. Raja and D.R. Davies, eds., Varieties of Attention, 63–102. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wittmann, W. W., and Süß, H. 1999. Investigating the paths between working memory, intelligence, knowledge, and complex problem-solving performances via Brunswik Symmetry. In P. L. Ackerman, P. C. Kyllonen, and R. D. Roberts, eds., Learning and Individual Differences: Process, Trait, and Content Determinants, 77–108. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Wonderlic, 2002. Wonderlic Personnel Test & Scholastic Level Exam User’s Manual. Vernon Hills: Wonderlic, Inc.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×