Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Violent Behavior and Aggression
- The Cambridge Handbook of Violent Behavior and Aggression
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction: The Cambridge Handbook of Violent Behavior and Aggression
- Part I Introduction and Overview
- Part II Biosocial Foundations of Violence and Aggression
- Part III Individual and Interpersonal Factors for Violence and Aggression
- Part IV Contextual Factors for Violence and Aggression
- Part V Looking Toward the Future
- 37 The Interrelationship of Self-Control and Violent Behavior: Pathways and Policies
- 38 The New Frontier: Leveraging Innovative Technologies to Prevent Bullying
- 39 Neural Substrates of Youth and Adult Antisocial Behavior
- 40 Research Designs and Methods for Evaluating and Refining Interventions for Youth Violence Prevention
- 41 New Directions in Research on Violence: Bridging Science, Practice, and Policy
- Index
- References
40 - Research Designs and Methods for Evaluating and Refining Interventions for Youth Violence Prevention
from Part V - Looking Toward the Future
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 July 2018
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Violent Behavior and Aggression
- The Cambridge Handbook of Violent Behavior and Aggression
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction: The Cambridge Handbook of Violent Behavior and Aggression
- Part I Introduction and Overview
- Part II Biosocial Foundations of Violence and Aggression
- Part III Individual and Interpersonal Factors for Violence and Aggression
- Part IV Contextual Factors for Violence and Aggression
- Part V Looking Toward the Future
- 37 The Interrelationship of Self-Control and Violent Behavior: Pathways and Policies
- 38 The New Frontier: Leveraging Innovative Technologies to Prevent Bullying
- 39 Neural Substrates of Youth and Adult Antisocial Behavior
- 40 Research Designs and Methods for Evaluating and Refining Interventions for Youth Violence Prevention
- 41 New Directions in Research on Violence: Bridging Science, Practice, and Policy
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Violent Behavior and Aggression , pp. 756 - 776Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Aos, S., Lieb, R., Mayfield, J., Miller, M., & Pennucci, A. (2004). Benefits and costs of prevention and early intervention programs for youth. Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy, 2004.Google Scholar
Berkel, C., Mauricio, A. M., Schoenfelder, E., & Sandler, I. N. (2011). Putting the pieces together: An integrated model of program implementation. Prevention Science, 12(1), 23–33.Google Scholar
Biglan, A., Ary, D., & Wagenaar, A. C. (2000). The value of interrupted time-series experiments for community intervention research. Prevention Science, 1(1), 31–49.Google Scholar
Bosworth, K., Espelage, D., & Du, T. (1998). A computer based violence prevention intervention for adolescents: Pilot study. Adolescence, 33, 785–795.Google Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). Contexts of child rearing: Problems and prospects. American Psychologist, 34(10), 844.Google Scholar
Brown, C. H., Kellam, S. G., Kaupert, S., Muthén, B. O., Wang, W., Muthén, L. K., … & McManus, J. W. (2012). Partnerships for the design, conduct, and analysis of effectiveness, and implementation research: Experiences of the prevention science and methodology group. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 39, 301–316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bumbarger, B. K. (2014). Understanding and promoting treatment integrity in prevention. In Hagermoser Sanetti, L. M. & Kratochwill, T. R. (Eds), Treatment integrity: A foundation for evidence-based practice in applied psychology (pp. 35–54). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassidy, T., Bowman, B., McGrath, C., & Matzopoulos, R. (2016). Brief report on a systematic review of youth violence prevention through media campaigns: Does the limited yield of strong evidence imply methodological challenges or absence of effect? Journal of Adolescence, 52, 22–26.Google Scholar
Castro, F. G., Barrera, M., Jr., & Martinez, C. R., Jr. (2004). The cultural adaptation of prevention interventions: Resolving tensions between fidelity and fit. Prevention Science, 5(1), 41–45.Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2007). The effectiveness of universal school-based programs for the prevention of violent and aggressive behavior: A report on recommendations of the Task Force on Community Preventive Services. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 56(RR-7), 1–11.Google Scholar
Coffey, J. H. & Horner, R. H. (2012). The sustainability of schoolwide positive behavior interventions and supports. Exceptional Children, 78, 407–422.Google Scholar
Coie, J. D., Watt, N. F., West, S. G., Hawkins, J. D., Asarnow, J. R., Markman, H. J., … & Long, B. (1993). The science of prevention: A conceptual framework and some directions for a national research program. American Psychologist, 48(10), 1013–1020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collins, L. M., Murphy, S. A., Nair, V. N., & Strecher, V. J. (2005). A strategy for optimizing and evaluating behavioral interventions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 30, 65–73.Google Scholar
Curtis, A. (2014). Tracing the school-to-prison pipeline from zero-tolerance policies to juvenile justice dispositions. Georgetown Law Journal, 102(4), 1251–1278.Google Scholar
Dahlberg, L. L., Toal, S. B., Swahn, M., Behrens, C. B. (2005). Measuring Violence-Related Attitudes, Behaviors, and Influences Among Youths: A Compendium of Assessment Tools (2nd ed.). Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Google Scholar
Durlak, J. A., Taylor, R. D., Kawashima, K., Pachan, M. K., DuPre, E. P., Celio, C. I., … & Weissberg, R. P. (2007). Effects of positive youth development programs on school, family, and community systems. American Journal of Community Psychology, 39, 269–286.Google Scholar
Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82, 405–432.Google Scholar
Dusenbury, L., Brannigan, R., Falco, M., & Hansen, W. B. (2003). A review of research on fidelity of implementation: Implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings. Health Education, 18, 237–256.Google ScholarPubMed
Espelage, D. L., Low, S., Polanin, J. R., & Brown, E. C. (2013). The impact of a middle-school program to reduce aggression, victimization, and sexual violence. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53, 180–186.Google Scholar
Fagan, A. A. & Catalano, R. F. (2012). What works in youth violence prevention: A review of the literature. Research on Social Work Practice, 23, 141–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fagan, A. A., Hanson, K., Hawkins, J. D., & Arthur, M. W. (2008). Implementing effective community-based prevention programs in the Community Youth Development Study. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 6, 256–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, A. D. & Camou, S. (2006). School-based interventions for youth violence prevention. In Lutzker, J. R. (Ed.), Preventing violence: Research and evidence-based intervention strategies (pp. 125–145). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Farrell, A. D., Henry, D. B., & Bettencourt, A. (2013). Methodological challenges examining subgroup differences: Examples from universal school-based youth violence prevention trials. Prevention Science, 14(2), 121–133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farrell, A. D., Henry, D., Bradshaw, C., & Reischl, T. (2016). Designs for evaluating the community-level impact of comprehensive prevention programs: Examples from the CDC centers of excellence in youth violence prevention. Journal of Primary Prevention, 37, 165–188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farrell, A. D., Mehari, K. R., Kramer-Kuhn, A. M., Mays, S. A., & Sullivan, T. N. (2015). A qualitative analysis of factors influencing middle school students’ use of skills taught by a violence prevention curriculum. Journal of School Psychology, 53(3), 179–194.Google Scholar
Farrell, A. D., Mehari, K. R., Mays, S., Sullivan, T. N., & Le, A. T. (2015). Participants’ perceptions of a violence prevention curriculum for middle school students: Was it relevant and useful? Journal of Primary Prevention, 36, 227–246.Google Scholar
Farrell, A. D., Meyer, A. L., Kung, E. M., & Sullivan, T. N. (2001). Development and evaluation of school-based violence prevention programs. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 30(2), 207–220.Google Scholar
Farrell, A. D., Valois, R. F., & Meyer, A. L. (2002). Evaluation of the RIPP-6 violence prevention program at a rural middle school. American Journal of Health Education, 33(3), 167–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, A. D., Valois, R. F., Meyer, A. L., & Tidwell, R. P. (2003). Impact of the RIPP violence prevention program on rural middle school students. Journal of Primary Prevention, 24(2), 143–167.Google Scholar
Farrell, A. D. & Vulin-Reynolds, M. (2007). Violent behavior and the science of prevention. In Flannery, D. J., Vazsonyi, A. T., & Waldman, I. D. (Eds), The Cambridge handbook of violent behavior and aggression (pp. 767–786). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Finkelhor, D., Vanderminden, J., Turner, H., Shattuck, A., & Hamby, S. (2014). Youth exposure to violence prevention programs in a national sample. Child Abuse & Neglect, 38(4), 677–686.Google Scholar
Flay, B. R., Biglan, A., Boruch, R. F., Castro, F. G., Gottfredson, D., Kellam, S., … & Ji, P. (2005). Standards of evidence: Criteria for efficacy, effectiveness and dissemination. Prevention Science, 6(3), 151–175.Google Scholar
Gottfredson, D. C. (2001). Schools and delinquency. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gottfredson, D. C., Cook, T. D., Gardner, F. E., Gorman-Smith, D., Howe, G. W., Sandler, I. N., & Zafft, K. M. (2015). Standards of evidence for efficacy, effectiveness, and scale-up research in prevention science: Next generation. Prevention Science, 16(7), 893–926.Google Scholar
Gottfredson, G. D., Gottfredson, D. C., Czeh, E. R., Cantor, D., Crosse, S. B., & Hantman, I. (2002). National Study of Delinquency Prevention in Schools: Summary. Ellicott City, MD: Gottfredson Associates.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. D., Brown, E. C., Oesterle, S., Arthur, M. W., Abbott, R. D., & Catalano, R. F. (2008). Early effects of Communities That Care on targeted risks and initiation of delinquent behavior and substance use. Journal of Adolescent Health, 43(1), 15–22.Google Scholar
Henry, D. B., Farrell, A. D., & MVPP. (2004). The study designed by a committee: Design of the Multisite Violence Prevention Project. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 26(Suppl), 12–19.Google Scholar
Herman, J. W. & Waterhouse, J. K. (2014). A feasibility study to assess the effectiveness of Safe Dates for teen mothers. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 43, 695–709.Google Scholar
Kaufman, E. J. & Wiebe, D. J. (2015). State injury prevention policies and variation in death from injury. Injury Prevention, 22, 99–104.Google Scholar
Kazdin, A. E. (2016). Research design in clinical psychology (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar
Kellam, S. G., Koretz, D., & Mościcki, E. K. (1999). Core elements of developmental epidemiologically based prevention research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 27(4), 463–482.Google Scholar
Koper, C. S., Woods, D. J., & Isom, D. (2016). Evaluating a police-led community initiative to reduce gun violence in St. Louis. Police Quarterly, 19, 115–149.Google Scholar
Lipsey, M. W. & Derzon, J. H. (1998). Predictors of violent or serious delinquency in adolescence and early adulthood: a synthesis of longitudinal research. In Loeber, R. & Farrington, D. P. (Eds), Serious & violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 86–105). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Low, S., Smolkowski, K., & Cook, C. (2016). What constitutes high quality implementation of SEL programs? A latent class analysis of Second Step. Prevention Research. Advance online publication.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Matjasko, J. L., Vivolo-Kantor, A. M., Massetti, G. M., Holland, K. M., Holt, M. K., & Cruz, J. D. (2012). A systematic meta-review of evaluations of youth violence prevention programs: Common and divergent findings from 25 years of meta-analyses and systematic reviews. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(6), 540–552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mehari, K. R. & Farrell, A. D. (2013). The relation between peer victimization and adolescents’ well-being: The moderating role of ethnicity within context. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 25(1), 118–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mihalic, S. F. & Irwin, K. (2003). Blueprints for Violence prevention from research to real-world settings – factors influencing the successful replication of model programs. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 1(4), 307–329.Google Scholar
Metropolitan Area Child Study Research Group (MACS). (2002). A cognitive-ecological approach to preventing aggression in urban settings: Initial outcomes for high risk children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 179–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholls, J., Lawlor, E., Neitzert, E., & Goodspeed, T. (2009). A guide to Social Return on Investment. Cabinet Office, Office of the Third Sector. Retrieved December 4, 2017 from http://b.3cdn.net/nefoundation/aff3779953c5b88d53_cpm6v3v71.pdf.Google Scholar
Office of the Surgeon General; National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; National Institute of Mental Health; Center for Mental Health Services. (2001). Youth violence: A report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, MD: Office of the Surgeon General.Google Scholar
Olweus, D. (2005). A useful evaluation design, and effects of the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program. Psychology, Crime & Law, 11(4), 389–402.Google Scholar
Rohrbach, L. A., Grana, R., Sussman, S., & Valente, T. W. (2006). Type II translation: Transporting prevention interventions from research to real-world settings. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 29, 302–333.Google Scholar
Rubin, D. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 688–701.Google Scholar
Samples, F. & Aber, L. (1998). Evaluations of school-based violence prevention programs. In D. Elliott, B. Hamburg, & K. Williams (Eds), Violence in American schools (pp. 217–252). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
School Health Policies and Practices Study. (2015). Results from the School Health Policies and Practices Study 2014. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services & Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Google Scholar
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton, Mifflin and Company.Google Scholar
Sklad, M., Diekstra, R., Ritter, M. D., Ben, J., & Gravesteijn, C. (2012). Effectiveness of school-based universal social, emotional, and behavioral programs: Do they enhance students’ development in the area of skill, behavior, and adjustment? Psychology in the Schools, 49(9), 892–909.Google Scholar
Wilson, S. J., Lipsey, M. W., & Derzon, J. H. (2003). The effects of school-based intervention programs on aggressive behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 136–149.Google Scholar
Yale, M. E., Scott, K. G., Gross, M., & Gonzalez, A. (2003). Using developmental epidemiology to choose the target population for an intervention program in a high-risk neighborhood. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 32(2), 236–242.Google Scholar
Ybarra, M. L., Prescott, T. L., & Espelage, D. L. (2016). Stepwise development of a text messaging-based bullying prevention program for middle school students (BullyDown). Journal of Medical Internet Research mHealth and uHealth, 4(2), e60.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by