Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:24:43.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Knowledge and Experience: Interobjectivity, Subjectivity, and Social Relations

from Part I - Theoretical and Methodological Issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2018

By
Gordon Sammut ,
Martin W. Bauer  and
Sandra Jovchelovitch
Edited by
Alberto Rosa  and
Jaan Valsiner
Alberto Rosa
Affiliation:
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
Jaan Valsiner
Affiliation:
Aalborg University, Denmark
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology , pp. 49 - 62
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asch, S. E. (1987). Social Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bauer, M. W. (2015). On (social) representations and the iconoclastic impetus. In Sammut, G., Andreouli, E., Gaskell, G., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations (pp. 43–63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, M. W. & Gaskell, G. (2008). Social representations theory: A progressive research programme for social psychology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38(4), 335–353.Google Scholar
Coelho, N. E. & Figueiredo, L. C. (2003). Patterns of intersubjectivity in the constitution of subjectivity: Dimensions of otherness. Culture and Psychology, 9, 193–208.Google Scholar
Costall, A. (2013). Things that help make us what we are. In Sammut, G., Daanen, P., & Moghaddam, F. M. (Eds.), Understanding the Self and Others: Explorations in Intersubjectivity and Interobjectivity (pp. 66–76). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Daanen, P. & Sammut, G. (2012). G. H. Mead and knowing how to act: Practical meaning, routine interaction and the theory of interobjectivity. Theory and Psychology, 22(5), 556–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harré, R. & Sammut, G. (2013). What lies between? In Sammut, G., Daanen, P., & Moghaddam, F. M. (Eds.), Understanding the Self and Others: Explorations in Intersubjectivity and Interobjectivity (pp. 15–30). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jovchelovitch, S. (2007). Knowledge in Context: Representations, Community and Culture. Hove, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jovchelovitch, S. & Priego-Hernández, J. (2015). Cognitive polyphasia, knowledge encounters and public spheres. In Sammut, G., Andreouli, E., Gaskell, G., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations (pp. 163–178). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kärrholm, M. (2014). Interobjectivity in architectural research and theory: Towards a meta-theory of materiality and the effects of architecture and everyday life. The Journal of Architecture, 19(1), 64–80.Google Scholar
Kolakowski, L. (1972). Positivist Philosophy: From Hume to the Vienna Circle. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1996). On interobjectivity. Mind, Culture and Activity, 3(4), 228–245.Google Scholar
Marsico, G., Cabell, K. R., Valsiner, J., & Kharlamov, N. A. (2013). Interobjectivity as a border: The fluid dynamics of “betweenness.” In Sammut, G., Daanen, P., & Moghaddam, F. M. (Eds.), Understanding the Self and Others: Explorations in Intersubjectivity and Interobjectivity (pp. 51–65). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moghaddam, F. M. (2003). Interobjectivity and culture. Culture & Psychology, 9(3), 221–232.Google Scholar
Moghaddam, F. M. (2010). Intersubjectivity, interobjectivity and the embryonic fallacy in developmental science. Culture & Psychology, 16(4), 465–475.Google Scholar
Ross, L. & Ward, A. (1996). Naive realism in everyday life: Implications for social conflict and misunderstanding. In Brown, T., Reed, E. S., & Turiel, E. (Eds.),Values and Knowledge (pp. 103–135). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Sammut, G. (2015). Attitudes, social representations and points of view. In Sammut, G., Andreouli, E., Gaskell, G., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations (pp. 96–112). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sammut, G. & Bauer, M. (2011). Social influence: Modes and modalities. In Hook, D., Franks, B., & Bauer, M. (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Communication (pp. 87–106). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sammut, G., Bezzina, F., & Sartawi, M. (2015). The spiral of conflict: Naïve realism and the black sheep effect in attributions of knowledge and ignorance. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 21(2), 289–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sammut, G., Daanen, P., & Moghaddam, F. M. (Eds.). (2013). Understanding the Self and Others: Explorations in Intersubjectivity and Interobjectivity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sammut, G., Daanen, P., & Sartawi, M. (2010). Interobjectivity: Representations and artefacts in Cultural Psychology. Culture & Psychology, 16(4), 451–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sammut, G. & Howarth, C. (2014). Social representations. In Teo, T. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology (pp. 1799–1802). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Sammut, G. & Moghaddam, F. (2014). Interobjectivity. In Teo, T. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology (pp. 991–993). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Sammut, G. & Sartawi, M. (2012). Perspective-taking and the attribution of ignorance. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 42(2), 181–200.Google Scholar
Sandel, M. J. (2012). What Money Can't Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Wagner, W. (2015). Representation in action. In Sammut, G., Andreouli, E., Gaskell, G., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations (pp. 12–28). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wagner, W., Sen, R., Permanadeli, R., & Howarth, C. (2012). The veil and Muslim women's identity: Cultural pressures and resistance to stereotyping. Culture & Psychology, 18(4), 79–99.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×