Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:12:50.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Development and Education as Crossing Sociocultural Boundaries

from Part III - The Agent Rises a Reflective Self: Education and Development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2018

By
Giuseppina Marsico
Edited by
Alberto Rosa  and
Jaan Valsiner
Alberto Rosa
Affiliation:
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
Jaan Valsiner
Affiliation:
Aalborg University, Denmark
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology , pp. 302 - 316
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Abbey, E. (2012). Ambivalence and its transformation. In Valsiner, J. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Culture and Psychology (pp. 989–997). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baldwin, J. M. (1895). The origin of a “thing” and its nature. Psychological Review, 2, 551–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, J. M. (1906). Thought and Things: A Study of the Development and Meaning of Thought, or Genetic Logic. Volume 1: Functional Logic, or Genetic Theory of Knowledge. London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co.Google Scholar
Baldwin, J. M. (1908). Thought and Things: A Study of the Development and Meaning of Thought, or Genetic Logic. Volume 2: Experimental Logic, or Genetic Theory of Thought. London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co.Google Scholar
Baldwin, J. M. (1911). Thought and Things: A Study of the Development and Meaning of Thought, or Genetic Logic. Volume 3: Interest and Art Being Real Logic. London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co.Google Scholar
Baldwin, J. M. (1915). Genetic Theory of Reality. New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons.Google Scholar
Beloussov, L. V. (1998). The Dynamic Architecture of a Developing Organism. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluver Academic.Google Scholar
Bernstein, B. (1999). Vertical and horizontal discourse: An essay. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(2), 157–173.Google Scholar
Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity (rev. edn.). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Boesch, E. (1991). Symbolic Action Theory and Cultural Psychology. Berlin:Springer.Google Scholar
Brentano, F. (1981). Philosophical Investigations on Space, Time and the Continuum. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (1986). Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunet-Jailly, E. (2005). Theorizing borders: An interdisciplinary Perspective. Geopolitics, 10, 633–649.Google Scholar
Daniels, H. (2010). The mutual shaping of human action and institutional settings: A study of the transformation of children's services and professional work. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 31(4), 377–393.Google Scholar
Daniels, H. (2015). Boundaries within and between contexts. In Marsico, G., Dazzani, V., Ristum, M., & Bastos, A. C. (Eds.), Educational Contexts and Borders through A Cultural Lens – Looking Inside. Viewing Outside (Cultural Psychology of Education, vol. 1, pp. 11–27). Geneva: Springer.Google Scholar
Euclid, . (1970). Gli elementi (trans. by A. Frajese and L. Maccioni). Turin, Italy: UTET.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge (trans. by Smith, A. M. Sheridan). New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Innis, R. E. (2016). Between philosophy and cultural psychology: Pragmatist and semiotic reflections on the thresholds of sense. Culture & Psychology, 22(3), 331–361.Google Scholar
Lewin, K. (1951). Field Theory in Social Science. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Marsico, G. (2011). The “non-cuttable” space in between: Context, boundaries and their natural fluidity. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 45, 185–193.Google Scholar
Marsico, G. (2013). Moving between the social spaces: Conditions for boundaries crossing. In Marsico, G., Komatsu, K., and Iannaccone, A. (Eds.), Crossing Boundaries: Intercontextual Dynamics between Family and School. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Marsico, G. (2015a). Developing with time: Defining a temporal mereotopology. In Simão, L. M., Guimarães, D. S., and Valsiner, J. (Eds.), Temporality: Culture in the Flow of Human Experience (pp. 1–18), Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Marsico, G. (2015b). Cultivating possibilities for cultural psychology: Jerome Bruner in his becoming. In Marsico, G. (Ed.), Jerome S. Bruner Beyond 100: Cultivating Possibilities (Cultural Psychology of Education, vol. 2, pp. 241–245). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsico, G. (2016). The borderland. Culture & Psychology, 22(2), 206–215. DOI: 10.1177/1354067X15601199.Google Scholar
Marsico, G., Cabell, K. R., Valsiner, J., & Kharlamov, N. A. (2013). Interobjectivity as a border: The fluid dynamics of “betweenness.” In Sammut, G., Daanen, P., & Moghaddam, F. (Eds.), Understanding the Self and Others: Explorations in Intersubjectivity and Interobjectivity (pp. 51–65). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Marsico, G., Dazzani, V., Ristum, M., & Bastos, A. C. (Eds.). (2015). Educational Contexts and Borders Through a Cultural Lens: Looking Inside, Viewing Outside (Cultural Psychology of Education, vol. 1). Geneva: Springer.Google Scholar
Marsico, G. & Iannaccone, A. (2012). The work of schooling. In Valsiner, J. (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Culture and Psychology (pp. 830–868). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marsico, G., Komatsu, K., & Iannaccone, A. (Eds.). (2013). Crossing Boundaries: Intercontextual Dynamics Between Family and School. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Marsico, G. & Valsiner, J. (2016). Making history: Apprehending future while reconstructing the past. In Säljö, R., Linell, P., & Mäkitalo, Å. (Eds.), Memory Practices and Learning: Experiential, Institutional, and Sociocultural Perspectives (pp. 355–372), Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Marsico, G. & Varzi, A. (2016). Psychological and social borders: Regulating relationships. In Valsiner, J., Marsico, G., Chaudhary, N., Sato, T., & Dazzani, V. (Eds.), Psychology as a Science of Human Being: The Yokohama Manifesto (Annals of Theoretical Psychology, vol. 13, pp. 327–335), Geneva: Springer.Google Scholar
Meinong, A. (1902/1910). Ueber Annahmen. Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane (suppl.).Google Scholar
Ogawa, R. T., Crain, R., Loomis, M., & Ball, T. (2008). CHAT-IT: Toward conceptualizing learning in the context of formal organizations. Educational Researcher, 37(2), 83–95.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1901/1935). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sato, T. & Valsiner, J. (2010). Time in life and life in time: Between experiencing and accounting. Ritsumeikan Journal of Human Sciences, 20(1), 79–92.Google Scholar
Sevastianov, S. V., Laine, J. P., Kireev, A. A., Golunov, S. V., Meževič, N. M., et al. (Eds.). (2015). Introduction to Border Studies. Vladivostok, Russia: Dalnauka.Google Scholar
Simmel, G. (1918/2010). The View of Life: Four Metaphysical Essays with Journal Aphorisms (trans. by Andrews, J.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Simmel, G. (1994). Bridge and door. Theory Culture Society, 11(5), 5–10.Google Scholar
Smith, B. (1997). Boundaries: An essay in mereotopology. In Hahn, L. H. (Ed.), The Philosophy of Roderick Chisholm (pp. 534–561). Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
Smith, B. & Varzi, A. (2000). Fiat and bona fide boundaries. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 60, 401–420.Google Scholar
Tateo, L. (2015). What imagination can teach us about higher mental functions. In Valsiner, J., Marsico, G., Chaudhary, N., Sato, T., and Dazzani, V. (Eds.), Psychology as the Science of Human Being (pp. 149–164). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Tateo, L. & Marsico, G. (2015). Navigating the unknown river of development. In Cresswell, J., Haye, A., Larrìn, A., Morgan, M., & Sullivan, G., Dialogue and Debate in the Making of Theoretical Psychology (pp. 30–39). Ontario, Canada: Captus University Publications.Google Scholar
Valsiner, J. (1997). Culture and the Development of Children's Action (2nd edn.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Valsiner, J. (1999). I create you to control me: A glimpse into basic processes of semiotic mediation. Human Development, 42, 26–30.Google Scholar
Valsiner, J. (2000). Culture and Human Development. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Valsiner, J. (2014a). An Invitation to Cultural Psychology. London: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valsiner, J. (2014b). Functional reality of the quasi real: Gegenstandstheorie and cultural psychology today. Culture & Psychology, 20(3), 285–307.Google Scholar
Valsiner, J. & Van der Veer, R. (2014). Encountering the border: Vygotsky's zona blizhaishego razvitia and its implications for theory of development. In Yasnitsky, A., van der Veer, R. & Ferrari, M. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Cultural-Historical Psychology (pp. 148–173). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varzi, A. (1997). Boundaries, continuity, and contact. Noûs, 31, 26–58.Google Scholar
Varzi, A. (1998). Basic problems of mereotopology. In Guarino, N. (Ed.), Formal Ontology in Information Systems (pp. 29–38). Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
Varzi, A. (2011). Boundaries, conventions, and realism. In Campbell, J. K., O'Rourke, M., & Slater, M. H. (Eds.), Carving Nature at Its Joints: Natural Kinds in Metaphysics and Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Varzi, A. (2013). Boundary. In Zalta, E. (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2013 Edition). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2015/entries/boundary/.Google Scholar
Varzi, A. (2016). Ai Limiti del Possibile. In Taddio, L. (Ed.), In dialogo con Maurizio Ferraris (pp. 91–107). Milan: Mimesis.Google Scholar

Further Reading

Augé, M. (1992). Non-lieux: introduction à une anthropologie de la surmodernité (vol. 20). Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Smith, B. & Brogaard, B. (2000). Quantum mereotopology. AAAI Technical Report WS-00–08, 25–31.Google Scholar
Valsiner, J. (2011). Constructing the vanishing present between the future and the past. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 34(2), 141–150.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×