Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:24:43.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Cultural Psychology as the Science of Sensemaking: A Semiotic-cultural Framework for Psychology

from Part I - Theoretical and Methodological Issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2018

Alberto Rosa
Affiliation:
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
Jaan Valsiner
Affiliation:
Aalborg University, Denmark
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Atmanspacher, H. & Martin, J. (2004). Reflections on process and persons. In Weber, M. (Ed.), After Whitehead: Rescher on Process Metaphysics (pp. 161172). Frankfurt: Ontos.Google Scholar
Baerveldt, C. & Verheggen, T. (2012). Enactivism. In Valsiner, J. (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Culture and Psychology (pp. 165190). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boesch, E. (1991). Symbolic Action Theory and Cultural Psychology. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Bucci, W. (1997). Psychoanalysis and Cognitive Science. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Bühler, K. (1934/1990). Theory of Language: The Representational Function of Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Feldman-Barrett, L. (2006). Solving the emotion paradox: Categorization and the experience of emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 2046.Google Scholar
Green, C. D. (2015). Why psychology isn't unified, and probably never will be. Review of General Psychology, 19(3), 207214.Google Scholar
Heft, H. (2013). Environment, cognition, and culture: Reconsidering the cognitive map. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 33, 1425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidbreder, E. (1933). Seven Psychologies. New York: Appleton-Century.Google Scholar
Heine, S. (2011). Cultural Psychology. San Francisco: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Henriques, G. (2011). A New Unified Theory of Psychology. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Kimble, G. A. (1990). Mother Nature's bag of tricks is small. Psychological Science, 1, 3641.Google Scholar
Kintsch, W. (1988). The use of knowledge in discourse processing: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163182.Google Scholar
Kitayama, S. & Cohen, D. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of Cultural Psychology. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Landauer, T. K. & Dumais, S. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211240.Google Scholar
Lickliter, R. & Honeycutt, H. (2013). A developmental evolutionary framework for psychology. Review of General Psychology, 17, 184189. DOI: 10.1037/a0032932.Google Scholar
Linell, P. (2009). Rethinking Language, Mind and World Dialogically: Interactional and Contextual Theories of Sense-making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Mandler, G. (2011). From association to organization. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 232235. DOI: 10.1177/0963721411414656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, T. & Boag, S. (2014). Unifying psychology: Shared ontology and the continuum of practical assumptions. Review of General Psychology, 18, 4959.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, D. (Ed.). (2001). The Handbook of Culture and Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maturana, M. R., & Varela, J. F. (1980). Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1897/1932). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (ed. by Hartshorne, C. & Weiss, P., vol. 2). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Salvatore, S. (2012). Social life of the sign: Sensemaking in society. In Valsiner, J. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Culture and Psychology (pp. 241254). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Salvatore, S. (2016). Cultural psychology of desire. In Valsiner, J., Marsico, G., Chaudhary, N., Sato, T., & Dazzani, V. (Eds.), Psychology as the Science of Human Being: The Yokohama Manifesto (pp. 3349). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Salvatore, S. (2016). Psychology in Black and White: The Project for a Theory Driven Science. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Salvatore, S., Forges Davanzati, G., Potì, S., & Ruggieri, R. (2009). Mainstream economics and sensemaking. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 43(2), 158177.Google Scholar
Salvatore, S. & Freda, M. F. (2011). Affect unconscious and sensemaking: A psychodynamic semiotic and dialogic model. New Ideas in Psychology, 29, 119135.Google Scholar
Salvatore, S., Gelo, O. G., Gennaro, A., Metrangolo, R., Terrone, G., Pace, V., Venuleo, C., & Venezia, A. (2015). An automated method of content analysis for psychotherapy research: A further validation. Psychotherapy Research, 25(4), 113.Google Scholar
Salvatore, S. & Gennaro, A. (2012). The inherent dialogicality of the clinical exchange. International Journal for Dialogical Science, 6(1), 114.Google Scholar
Salvatore, S., Tebaldi, C., & Potì, S. (2006/2009). The discursive dynamic of sensemaking. In Salvatore, S., Valsiner, J., Strout, S., & Clegg, J. (Eds.), Yearbook of Idiographic Science (vol. 1, pp. 3972). Rome: Firera.Google Scholar
Salvatore, S. & Tschacher, W. (2012). Time dependency of psychotherapeutic exchanges: The contribution of the theory of dynamic systems in analyzing process. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 253. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00253.Google Scholar
Salvatore, S. & Valsiner, J. (2010). Between the general and the unique: Overcoming the nomothetic versus idiographic opposition. Theory & Psychology, 20(6), 817833.Google Scholar
Salvatore, S. & Venuleo, C. (2013). Field and dynamic nature of sensemaking: Theoretical and methodological implications. Papers on Social Representation, 22(2), 21.1–21.41.Google Scholar
Salvatore, S. & Zittoun, T. (2011). Outlines of a psychoanalytically informed cultural psychology. In Salvatore, S. & Zittoun, T. (Eds.), Cultural Psychology and Psychoanalysis in Dialogue: Issues for Constructive Theoretical and Methodological Synergies (pp. 346). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Smedslund, J. (1988). Psycho-Logic. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Smedslund, J. (1995). Psychologic: Common sense and the pseudoempirical. In Smith, J. A., Harré, R., & van Langenhove, L. (Eds.), Rethinking Psychology (pp. 196206). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Stam, H. J. (2004). Unifying psychology: Epistemological act or disciplinary maneuver? Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 12591262. DOI: 10.1002/jclp.20069.Google Scholar
Uher, J. (2014). Interpreting “personality” taxonomies: Why previous models cannot capture individual-specific experiencing, behaviour, functioning and development. Major taxonomic tasks still lay ahead. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 49(4), 600655.Google Scholar
Uher, J., Addessi, E., & Visalberghi, E. (2013). Contextualised behavioural measurements of personality differences obtained in behavioural tests and social observations in adult capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 427444.Google Scholar
Valsiner, J. (2001). Processes structure of semiotic mediaton in human development. Human Development, 44, 8497.Google Scholar
Valsiner, J. (2007). Culture in Minds and Societies: Foundations of Cultural Psychology. New Delhi: SAGE.Google Scholar
Valsiner, J. (2009). Integrating psychology within the globalizing world: A requiem to the post-modernist experiment with Wissenschaft. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 43(1), 121.Google Scholar
Valsiner, J. (Ed.). (2012). The Oxford Handbook of Culture and Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Varela, F., Thompson, F., & Rosch, E. (1991). The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Further Reading

Salvatore, S. & Valsiner, J. (2011). Idiographic science as a non-existing object: The importance of the reality of the dynamic system. In Salvatore, S., Valsiner, J., Gennaro, A., & Simon, J. B. Traves (Eds.), Yearbook of Idiographic Science (vol. 3, pp. 726). Rome: Firera.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×