Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-20T19:11:27.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Basic Concepts of Creativity

from Part I - Core Concepts of Lifespan Creativity Development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2021

By
Hansika Kapoor  and
James C. Kaufman
Edited by
Sandra W. Russ ,
Jessica D. Hoffmann  and
James C. Kaufman
Sandra W. Russ
Affiliation:
Case Western Reserve University, Ohio
Jessica D. Hoffmann
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
James C. Kaufman
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
Get access

Summary

In this chapter, we provide an overview of the basic concepts associated with creativity. This includes definitions as well as classic and contemporary models. Our approach to examining creativity theories is in line with the developmental theme of this book. We move through the progressive Four Cs model (mini, little, Pro, and Big) by elucidating each using appropriate theoretical conceptions. The Four Cs model and its representation of the creative trajectory over time, skill, practice, and expertise is crucial to our understanding of creativity across the lifespan. We conclude with placing creativity into a larger perspective that emerges from individual mental processes but thrives within overarching systems.

Keywords

creativity theorydivergent thinkingFour Cs modelstructure of creativity
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Lifespan Development of Creativity , pp. 5 - 19
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(5), 997–1013. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.43.5.997Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357–376. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In Staw, B. M. & Cummings, L. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (vol. 10, pp. 123–167). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Retrieved from http://web.mit.edu/curhan/www/docs/Articles/15341_Readings/Group_Performance/Amabile_A_Model_of_CreativityOrg.Beh_v10_pp123-167.pdfGoogle Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M., & Kramer, S. (2011). The progress principle: Using small wins to ignite joy, engagement, and creativity at work. Brighton, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M., & Pratt, M. G. (2016). The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 157–183. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2016.10.001Google Scholar
Avitia, M. J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Beyond g and c: The relationship of rated creativity to long-term storage and retrieval (Glr). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 293.Google Scholar
Baer, J. (2011). Why grand theories of creativity distort, distract, and disappoint. The International Journal of Creativity & Problem Solving, 21(1), 73–100.Google Scholar
Baer, M., & Oldham, G. R. (2006). The curvilinear relation between experienced creative time pressure and creativity: Moderating effects of openness to experience and support for creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 963–970. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.963Google Scholar
Barron, F. (1955). The disposition toward originality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 478–485. doi:10.1037/h0048073Google Scholar
Batey, M., & Furnham, A. (2006). Creativity, intelligence and personality: A critical review of the scattered literature. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132(4), 355–429. doi:10.3200/MONO.132.4.355-430Google Scholar
Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2007). Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for “mini-c” creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1(2), 73–79. doi:10.1037/1931-3896.1.2.73Google Scholar
Boden, M. A. (2004). Creative minds: Myths and mechanisms (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retentions in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67(6), 380–400. doi:10.1037/h0040373Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In Csikszentmihalyi, M. (Ed.), The systems model of creativity (pp. 47–61). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-9085-7_4Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 313–335). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, C. D., Kaufman, J. C., & McClure, F. H. (2011). Non-cognitive constructs and self-reported creativity by domain. Journal of Creative Behavior, 45 , 188–202.Google Scholar
Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Reviews, 2(4), 290–309. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0101_1Google Scholar
Fink, A., Grabner, R. H., Benedek, M., Reishofer, G., Hauswirth, V., Fally, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2009). The creative brain: Investigation of brain activity during creative problem solving by means of EEG and fMRI. Human Brain Mapping, 30(3), 734–748. doi:10.1002/hbm.20538Google Scholar
Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P. (2013). Rewriting the language of creativity: The Five A’s framework. Review of General Psychology, 17(1), 69–81. doi:10.1037/a0029528Google Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P. (2015). Creativity as a sociocultural act. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 49(3), 165–180. doi:10.1002/jocb.94Google Scholar
Glǎveanu, V. P. (2019). The creativity reader. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P., Hanchett Hanson, M., Baer, J., Barbot, B., Clapp, E., Corazza, G. E., … Sternberg, R. J. (2020). Advancing creativity theory and research: A sociocultural manifesto. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(3), 741–745. doi:10.1002/jocb.395Google Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P., & Kaufman, J. C. (2019). Creativity: A historical perspective. In Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (2nd ed., pp. 9–26). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. The American Psychologist, 5(9), 444–454. doi:10.1037/h0063487Google Scholar
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Hennessey, B. A. (2019). Motivation and creativity. In Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (2nd ed., pp. 374–395). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61(1), 569–598. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100416Google Scholar
Kampylis, P. G., & Valtanen, J. (2010). Redefining creativity – Analyzing definitions, collocations, and consequences. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 44(3), 191–214. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2010.tb01333.xGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. (2011). Individual differences in creativity. In Chamorro-Premuzic, T., von Stumm, S., & Furnham, A. (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of individual differences (pp. 679–697). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781444343120.ch26Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2002). Could Steven Spielberg manage the Yankees?: Creative thinking in different domains. Korean Journal of Thinking & Problem Solving, 12, 5–15.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The Four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1–12. doi:10.1037/a0013688Google Scholar
Kozbelt, A., Beghetto, R. A., & Runco, M. A. (2010). Theories of creativity. In Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 20–47). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lubart, T. (2001). Models of the creative process: Past, present and future. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3–4), 295–308. doi:10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334Google Scholar
Mumford, M. D. (2001). Something old, something new: Revisiting Guilford’s conception of creative problem solving. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3–4), 267–276. doi:10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_04Google Scholar
Mumford, M. D., Mobley, M. I., Reiter-Palmon, R., Uhlman, C. E., & Doares, L. M. (1991). Process analytic models of creative capacities. Creativity Research Journal, 4(2), 91–122. doi:10.1080/10400419109534380Google Scholar
Osborn, A. F. (1963). Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative problem-solving. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Plucker, J. A., & Beghetto, R. A. (2004). Why creativity is domain general, why it looks domain specific, and why the distinction does not matter. In Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., & Singer, J. L. (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 153–167). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10692-009Google Scholar
Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. The Phi Delta Kappan, 42(7), 305–310. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/20342603Google Scholar
Sadler-Smith, E. (2015). Wallas’ four-stage model of the creative process: More than meets the eye? Creativity Research Journal, 27(4), 342–352. doi:10.1080/10400419.2015.1087277Google Scholar
Sawyer, R. K. (2012). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation. New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1016/0140-1750(88)90050-4Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2011). Creativity and discovery as blind variation: Campbell’s (1960) BVSR model after the half-century mark. Review of General Psychology, 15(2), 158–174. doi:10.1037/a0022912Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2016). Defining creativity: Don’t we also need to define what is not creative? The Journal of Creative Behavior, 1–15. doi:10.1002/jocb.137Google Scholar
Sligh, A. C., Conners, F. A., & Roskos-Ewoldsen, B. (2005). Relation of creativity to fluid and crystallized intelligence. Journal of Creative Behavior, 39, 123–136.Google Scholar
Smith, S. M., Ward, T. B., & Finke, R. A. (1995). The creative cognition approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stein, M. I. (1953). Creativity and culture. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 36(2), 311–322. doi:10.1080/00223980.1953.9712897Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2018). A triangular theory of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12(1), 50–67. doi:10.1037/aca0000095Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1992). Buy low and sell high: An investment approach to creativity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1(1), 1–5.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Ward, T. B. (2008). The role of domain knowledge in creative generation. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 363–366.Google Scholar
Williams, R., Runco, M. A., & Berlow, E. (2016). Mapping the themes, impact, and cohesion of creativity research over the last 25 years. Creativity Research Journal, 28(4), 385–394. doi:10.1080/10400419.2016.1230358Google Scholar
Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Towards a theory of organizational creativity. The Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293–321. doi:10.2307/258761Google Scholar
Woodman, R. W., & Schoenfeldt, L. F. (1990). An interactionist model of creative behavior. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 24(4), 279–290. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.1990.tb00549.xGoogle Scholar
Yoruk, S., & Runco, M. A. (2014). The neuroscience of divergent thinking. Activitas Nervosa Superior, 56(1–2), 1–16. Retrieved from http://activitas.org/index.php/nervosa/article/view/170/192Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×